A new saurolophine hadrosaurid (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda) from the Campanian
of Utah, North America
Terry A. Gates
and Rodney Scheetz
David Clark Labs, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA;
North Carolina Museum of Natural Science, 11 W Jones
St., Raleigh, NC 27601;
BYU Museum of Paleontology, 1683 N Canyon Rd., Provo, UT 84602, USA
(Received 21 February 2013; accepted 17 June 2014)
A new hadrosaurid is described from the Upper Cretaceous Neslen Formation of central Utah. Rhinorex condrupus gen. et
sp. nov. is diagnosed on the basis of two unique traits, a hook-shaped projection of the nasal anteroventral process and
dorsal projection of the posteroventral process of the premaxilla, and is further differentiated from other hadrosaurid
species based on the morphology of the nasal (large nasal boss on the posterodorsal corner of the circumnarial fossa, small
protuberences on the anterior process, absence of nasal arch), jugal (vertical postorbital process), postorbital (high degree
of ﬂexion present on posterior process), and squamosal (inclined anterolateral processes). This new taxon was discovered
in estuarine sediments dated at approximately 75 Ma and just 250 km north of the proliﬁc dinosaur-bearing strata of the
Kaiparowits Formation, possibly overlapping in time with Gryposaurus monumentensis. Phylogenetic parsimony and
Bayesian analyses associate this new taxon with the Gryposaurus clade, even though the type specimen does not possess
the diagnostic nasal hump of the latter genus. Comparisons with phylogenetic analyses from other studies show that a
current consensus exists between the general structure of the hadrosaurid evolutionary tree, but on closer examination there
is little agreement among species relationships.
Keywords: Hadrosauridae; ornithopod; Cretaceous; Utah; Book Cliffs; Neslen Formation; biogeography; phylogenetics
The Cretaceous rocks of western North America have
yielded the highest diversity of hadrosaurid dinosaurs in
the world (Horner et al.2004; Gates & Evans 2005;
arquez 2010b). These megaherbivorous ornitho-
pod dinosaurs are plausibly the most common dinosaur
fossils found from the Campanian through the terminal
Cretaceous, recorded in almost every terrestrial fossilifer-
ous formation of North America. Even more remarkable
is that during the late Campanian, it appears that hadro-
saurids generally occupied relatively small geographical
ranges in the Western Interior Basin (WIB) (Gates et al.
Whereas the diversity of hadrosaurid dinosaurs has
been relatively well understood in the northern region of
the WIB for several decades, that of the southern region
has remained low until a recent acceleration in discovery
(e.g. Gates et al.2007,2011; Gates & Sampson 2007;
Wagner & Lehman 2009). This surge in identiﬁcation of
new species is due in large part to the exploration of new
sedimentary formations such as the Kaiparowits and Wah-
weap formations of southern Utah (Gates et al.2013). The
Book Cliffs of central Utah (Fig. 1), likewise, are greatly
underappreciated for their fossil potential. Early in the
twentieth century, coal mines in the Book Cliffs were rec-
ognized as a repository for dinosaur tracks and have been
utilized as a rich data source since (Parker & Balsley
1989). Only two vertebrate skeletal fossil specimens have
been reported from these rocks: ﬁrst, Thomson et al.
(2013) described a partial tyrannosaurid foot from the
Neslen Formation that possesses unique morphological
traits, differing from a contemporaneous species
(Carr et al.2011; Zanno et al.2013) less than 250 km
south in the Kaiparowits Formation; and secondly there is
a hadrosaurid, also from the Neslen Formation, in which
only extensive skin impressions have been the subject of
publication (Anderson et al.1999). Here we describe this
hadrosaurid specimen (BYU 13258) as a new saurolo-
phine genus, as well as discussing its biogeographical,
ecological and phylogenetic implications.
Geological and taphonomic background
The Book Cliffs of east-central Utah (Fig. 1) record an
overall regressive sequence of Late Cretaceous marine to
terrestrial rocks. Several formations have been named
within the sequence, and of these the Neslen Formation
Corresponding author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
ÓThe Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London 2014. All Rights Reserved.
Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2014
has proven to be one of the most economically exploited
because of its large, laterally extensive coal beds, the
Chesterﬁeld coal zone, which is traceable for 120 km
(Fisher et al.1960; Kirschbaum & Hettinger 2004). In
addition to coal, the formation is comprised of a full com-
plement of terrestrial to near marine siliciclastic sedi-
ments, delimited by two regional sequence boundaries
(Kirschbaum & Hettinger 2004).
Anderson et al.(1999) described the depositional envi-
ronment of BYU 13258 in detail, which corresponds to
the Facies Assemblage 2 (lenticular cross-stratiﬁed sand-
stone, tabular ripple-laminated sandstones, and inclined
heterolithic strata) of Kirschbaum & Hettinger (2004).
The former authors reported a ﬁning upward sandstone
sequence interlaced with siltstone, abundant Teredolites
and plant debris (Anderson et al.1999) that were likely
deposited within a channel near a tidally inﬂuenced delta
(Kirschbaum & Hettinger 2004). Firmly indurated
sandstone together with a precarious ascent to the site led
excavators to remove BYU 13528 within a number of
manageable sandstone blocks air-lifted by the Utah
National Guard. Although the postcranial skeleton of
BYU 13528 has yet to be prepared, quarry maps and sand-
stone blocks suggest that the animal was mostly articu-
lated, with minor dislocation of some tails sections. The
body was found lying on its left side with neural spines
oriented into the hill. The limbs are missing from the
excavated specimen, but if they were associated prior to
burial it seems reasonable that they eroded down the steep
hillside long before its discovery.
All geological age approximations of the Neslen Forma-
tion are based on ammonite biostratigraphy from Gill &
Hail (1975) and stratigraphical correlations from Kirsch-
baum & Hettinger (2004). BYU 13528 was found approxi-
mately 12 m above the base of the Neslen Formation
(Anderson et al.1999), which falls within either the Bacu-
lites scotti or Didymoceras nebraskense ammonite zones
that Izett et al.(1998) dated to 74.5 §0.1 Ma and 74.1 §
0.1 Ma, respectively. In contrast, Cobban et al.(2006)
favoured older ages for these same biostratigraphical zones
(75.56 §0.11 Ma and 75.19 §0.28 Ma). Thomson et al.
(2013) published a recalibrated date from Izett et al.
(1998) based on recommendations from Renne et al.
(2010) to 75.15 §0.29 Ma, similar to the Cobban et al.
AMNH: American Museum of Natural History, New
York, USA; BYU: Brigham Young University Museum
of Paleontology, Provo, UT, USA; CMN: Canadian
Figure 1. Map showing Book Cliffs (black ﬁll) and approximate
position (star) of the Rhinorex condrupus gen. et sp. nov. type
locality within the state of Utah.
Figure 2. Sample of skin impressions from Rhinorex condrupus gen. et sp. nov., BYU 13528. Scale bar D15 mm.
2 T. A. Gates and R. Scheetz
Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; MOR:
Museum of the Rockies, Bozeman, MT, USA; NCSM:
North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh,
NC, USA; RAM: Raymond M. Alf Museum, Claremont,
CA, USA; ROM: Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada; TCMI: The Children’s Museum of Indi-
anapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA; TMP: Royal Tyrrell
Museum of Palaeontology, Drumheller, Alberta, Canada.
Dinosauria Owen, 1842
Ornithopoda Marsh, 1881
Hadrosauridae Cope, 1870
Saurolophinae Brown, 1914 (sensu Prieto-Marquez
Rhinorex gen. nov.
Type species. Rhinorex condrupus sp. nov.
Diagnosis. As for type and only species.
Derivation of name. Rhino (Greek) nose; rex (Latin)
king, in reference to the large nose possessed by this taxon.
Rhinorex condrupus sp. nov.
Holotype. BYU 13258, partial, but mostly articulated
skeleton and skull. Postcranial elements include partial
pelvis and vertebral column.
Diagnosis. Species of saurolophine hadrosaurid with the
following autapomorphies: posteroventral process of pre-
maxilla possesses slight dorsal expansion on the medial
margin at approximately the midpoint; anteroventral pro-
cess of nasal resembles a ﬁsh hook being wide, triangular,
and possessing a small dorsally directed bump. Differen-
tial diagnosis: Rhinorex condrupus is also distinguished
from other hadrosaurid species by lack of lateral ﬂaring
on the medial margin of the posteroventral process of the
premaxilla as in Gryposaurus spp.; vomer with elongated
excavation at junction of anterior and posterior processes
shared with G. monumentensis; posterodorsal margin of
the circumnarial depression gently incised and located
dorsal to the anterior half of the lacrimal as in Gryposaurus
spp.; large rugose boss on posterodorsal corner of circum-
narial fossa; small (<1 cm) bony protuberances along
anterodorsal margin of nasal, increasing in size posteriorly
(present on one specimen of Gryposaurus notabilis,
AMNH 5350); a nasal lacking a solid raised crest on the
posterior region of nasal as in Edmontosaurus spp., Acri-
stavus gagslarsoni, and a juvenile and ‘adult’ specimen of
Gryposaurus notabilis (TMP 80.22.1 and AMNH 5350,
respectively); and a jugal with a postorbital process ori-
ented perpendicular to the main jugal body as in
Kritosaurus spp. (slightly inclined posteriorly in Grypo-
saurus species except specimen MOR 553S-8-26-9-54,
greatly inclined in Edmontosaurus spp., Prosaurolophus
maximus,Saurolophus spp., Maiasaura peeblesorum,
Brachylophosaurus canadensis); deep skull as in Krito-
saurus navajovius (ratio of dorsoventral height along pos-
terior margin of quadrate/anteroposterior length from
posterior quadrate margin to predentary oral margin of
0.70 or greater; this measurement is approximated on
BYU 13258 to be 0.75); temporal bar and frontal inclined
to approximately 40to the horizontal as seen in Kritosau-
Derivation of name. condo (Latin) bury, in reference
to being buried in rock; rupes (Latin) cliffs, for being
discovered in the Book Cliffs of Utah.
Figure 3. Rhinorex condrupus gen. et sp. nov. skull in right lat-
eral view. A, reconstruction with labelled autapomorphies; B,
BYU 13528. Abbreviations: nap, nasal anteroventral process;
ppd, premaxilla posteroventral process dorsal expansion. Scale
bar D10 cm.
New hadrosaurid from the Campanian of Utah 3
Occurrence. Neslen Formation, ~12 m from base of for-
mation (Anderson et al.1999) in Thompson Canyon,
Grand County, Utah; average age approximately 75.88
Ma or 75.15 Ma adjusted from Cobban et al.(2006) and
modiﬁed by Thomson et al.(2013) from Izett et al.
(1998), respectively. Brian Anderson and Roger Wagerle,
students at the University of California at Riverside, dis-
covered the site in 1992 while conducting a geological
study of the Book Cliffs area. Together with their advisor
Mary Droser, and another graduate student, Reese Barrick
from the University of Southern California, they pursued
an excavation permit. William Stokes at the Utah BLM
Ofﬁce suggested they use BYU as a designated repository
with Ken Stadtman’s collection expertise.
Description. See below.
Remarks. Several other characteristics of the skull are
unique to this specimen, such as the vertical orientation of
the anterior infratemporal fenestra margin and the exceed-
ingly large (80 mm) height differential between the poste-
rior skull and the dorsal orbital margin, but due to either
its fragmentary nature or possible preservational deforma-
tion, we are reluctant to diagnose the species on these fea-
tures. This is especially given that two other unambiguous
unique traits are listed above. Each of these ambiguous
traits is described further below.
Description and comparisons
The following description includes only cranial elements
because the postcranial elements are currently encased in
sandstone at the BYU Museum of Paleontology or at the
ﬁeld locality. The dorsal portion and left side of the skull
were exposed prior to recovery. As a consequence, many
of the left lateral skull elements are eroded or deeply
Table 1. Measurements of the skull BYU 13258, as described in Campione & Evans (2011) and McGarrity et al.(2013). The crest
measurements were designed largely for Prosaurolophus (McGarrity et al.2013) but were co-opted here to make the datasets more com-
parable, despite the apparent lack of an ossiﬁed crest. These were taken at the apex of the nasal where crest apex is here assumed to be
the point on the nasal directly dorsal to the posteriormost edge of the narial foramen.
Measurement description Length (mm)
Length of the skull measured from the tip of the snout to the back of the quadrate Not preserved
Height of the skull measured from the apex of the crest to the maxillary tooth row 300
Length of the crest measured from its rostral inﬂection point to the back of the crest N/A
Length of the lateral extension of the crest measured from the back of the circumnarial depression to the
back of the crest
Crestsnout length measured from the apex of the crest to the tip of the snout 550
Crest to frontal length measured from the apex of the crest to the caudal margin of the nasal ~165
Height of the crest measured from the apex to the ventral margin of the lateral extension of the crest N/A
Preorbital length measured from the tip of the snout to the orbital contact between the lacrimal and jugal 470
Circumnarial depression length measured from the reﬂected margin of the premaxilla to the back of the
Naris length measured from the rostroventral the contact between the nasal and premaxilla to its caudal
Prenarial length measured from the tip of the snout to the rostral margin of the naris 460
Length of the frontal measured along the midline of the skull from the rostral contact with the nasal and the
caudal contact with the parietal
Length of the parietal measured from the rostral contact with the frontals to its caudal margin between the
Length of the postorbital measured from the contact with the prefrontal along the orbital margin to its caudal
Maximum width of premaxilla measured from the midline of the skull to the lateral margin of the premaxilla Not preserved
Length of the jugal measured from the orbital contact with the lacrimal and the dorsal contact with the quadrate Not preserved
Minimum height of the jugal measured beneath the orbit 55
Minimum height of the jugal measured beneath the infratemporal fenestra rostral to the jugal ﬂange Not preserved
Height of the jugal measured beneath the infratemporal fenestra at the jugal ﬂange Not preserved
Height of maxilla measured from its dorsal margin to the maxillary tooth row 120
Length of dentary measured from its rostral margin to the back of the coronoid process of the dentary Not preserved
Height of dentary measured from the tooth row to the ventral margin of the dentary Not preserved
Length of diastema measured from the rostrodorsal contact with the predentary to the dentary tooth row Not preserved
Maximum height of the quadrate measured from its dorsal head to the ventral mandibular condyle Not preserved
4 T. A. Gates and R. Scheetz
weathered, with the prefrontals mostly eroded from the
specimen along with the nasals on the nasofrontal contact,
exposing the suture between these two elements. The
frontals suffered weathering damage in the form of trans-
form cracking and erosion, yet retain enough morphology
for description. See Table 1 for measurements of the skull
following recent morphometric studies of Campione &
Evans (2011) and McGarrity et al.(2013).
The right premaxilla (Fig. 3) is preserved better than
the left element, which has slight postfossilization
deformation. These elements display a broad, slightly
arcuate oral margin and an upturned premaxillary lip. The
latter feature is less pronounced than in the saurolophine
Edmontosaurus spp. (e.g. NCSM 23119). Angular
grooves and ridges line the underside of the oral margin,
smaller than those of Gryposaurus monumentensis (Gates
& Sampson 2007). Dorsally, as in Gryposaurus species
arquez 2012), the premaxillary shelf is divided
into anterior and posterior fossae by a low ridge running
posterolaterally from the anterior margin of the nasal
fenestra toward the lateral premaxillary oral margin. Both
the dorsal and lateral processes display typical Gryposau-
rus morphology, including the diagnostic ﬂaring of the
lateral process, although the morphology differs subtly
from the latter clade by not protruding laterally, only
Figure 4. Unique morphology observed on Rhinorex condrupus gen. et sp. nov., BYU 13528, nasal. A, right lateral view of complete
skull of BYU 13528 with rectangles showing locations of BE; B, nasal bumps as preserved on left nasal prior to mechanical removal;
arrows show location of each protuberance below; C, close up of anteroventral nasal process with the unique ﬁsh hook morphology; D,
dorsal view of nasal posterior region; E, left lateral view of nasal posterior region. Abbreviations: cnb, circumnarial boss; Na, nasal;
Pmx, premaxilla. Scale bars: A, D, E D10 cm; B, C D5 cm.
New hadrosaurid from the Campanian of Utah 5
anterodorsally. The extent to which the lateral process
extends posterodorsally along the face in Rhinorex con-
drupus is uncertain, but it is likely that it is equivalent to
Gryposaurus spp. and Kritosaurus in reaching the lacri-
mal (Gates & Sampson 2007; Prieto-M
arquez 2014), but
not the prefrontal.
In general aspect, the maxilla (Fig. 3)ofRhinorex condru-
pus is very similar to species of Gryposaurus, with a broad
dorsal process positioned anterior to the anteroposterior
midpoint of the element. This taxon is similar to the type
specimen of G. notabilis (CMN 2278) in that the large
maxillary foramen is exposed slightly more posteriorly,
that is, further away from the maxillarypremaxillary
contact, than in the type specimen of G. monumentensis
(RAM 6797) and a referred specimen of G. notabilis
(ROM 873) where the foramen is partially overlapped by
the premaxillary lateral process. Gryposaurus latidens has
the maxillary foramen positioned more ventrally than in
the other Gryposaurus species (Prieto-M
The maxillary foramen is also much larger in R. condru-
pus compared to other species, which is considered here
to be variable among individuals until evidence arises to
the contrary. Similar to G. notabilis (Gates & Sampson
2007), the anterodorsal process cannot be seen laterally
through the narial foramen. There is a line of several
smaller foramina oriented anteroposteriorly from approxi-
mately the midline of the maxilla extending posteriorly to
lie almost directly ventral to the jugal process. The latter
feature of BYU 13285 is smaller than in G. monumenten-
sis (RAM 6797) and a larger specimen of G. notabilis
(CMN 2278), more similar in proportions to smaller speci-
mens of G. notabilis (e.g. ROM 873 and TMP 80.22.1).
The ectopterygoid shelf extends horizontally to the poste-
rior margin of the maxilla, yielding an ectopterygoid ridge
that is more weakly developed than in G. monumentensis
(Gates & Sampson 2007). A row of nutrient foramina arch
into the upper third of the maxillary body on the medial
side of the element, as is typical with hadrosaurids (Prieto-
arquez 2010c). Dorsal to the medial nutrient foramina
the maxillary body swells, with a large overhang forming
throughout the articulation with the palatine and pterygoid.
Maxillary teeth are covered in a thick iron concretion and
therefore description of the morphology is not possible
and the exact tooth count is unknown. Yet, given the close
similarity to G. notabilis and G. monumentensis, we pre-
dict that R. condrupus will have over 40 tooth positions
and over three teeth within each tooth family.
Both nasals are preserved on BYU 13258, although only
the anterior half of the nasal (Fig. 3B) is preserved in
Figure 5. Dorsal view of the Rhinorex condrupus gen. et sp.
nov. skull roof, BYU 13528. A, line drawing; B, photograph.
Dotted lines are incomplete edges of elements. Vertical lines in
drawing represent rock matrix. Horizontal lines represent broken
bone surfaces. Abbreviations: fns, frontonasal suture; fpf, fron-
talprefrontal suture; Fr, frontal; Pa, parietal; Po, postorbital;
Sq, squamosal. Scale bars D10 cm.
6 T. A. Gates and R. Scheetz
excellent quality. The anterior process terminates prior to
the anterior margin of the narial foramen, as in Gryposau-
rus species, Acristavus gagslarsoni, some specimens
of Brachylophosaurus, and other more primitive iguano-
dontians (Gates & Sampson 2007; Gates et al.2011). At
an early stage of preparation, several protuberances were
discovered on the dorsal surface of the anterior nasal pro-
cess (Fig. 4A), but subsequently were abraded mechani-
cally. These protuberances increased in size posteriorly in
a similar fashion to Gryposaurus sp. AMNH 5350, yet
distinct from this specimen. Due to the poor preservation
of the posterior nasal on BYU 13258 it is unclear how far
the bumps would extend on the nasal, although the uner-
oded surface of the preorbital nasal apex shows that the
bumps could have extended that distance.
A ventral process of the nasal extends to contact the
lacrimal and projects anteriorly, thereby forming the
entire posterior and posteroventral borders of the narial
foramen. This conﬁguration is seen in all Gryposaurus
species and brachylophosaurin hadrosaurids, but the
dorsoventrally broad process and dorsally oriented barb
gives the entire anteroventral process a ﬁsh hook sem-
blance (Fig. 4B) unique to R. condrupus. It should be
noted that the type specimen of G. monumentensis
(RAM 6797) is missing most of the anteroventral nasal
The dorsal surface of the nasal does not demonstrate the
arched apex as seen on Gryposaurus species. Instead the
anterior process breaks from its posterodorsal ascent to
proceed nearly horizontally. A diminutive or complete
lack of a nasal hump or arch has been documented on G.
notabilis specimens such as the juvenile TMP 80.22.1
once assigned to the species G. incurvimanus (Prieto-
arquez 2010c). Also, the larger ‘adult’ specimen
AMNH 5350 has been attributed to G. notabilis but lacks
a nasal hump (Prieto-M
arquez 2010a), looking more simi-
lar to Rhinorex.
Adjacent to the posterior margin of the circumnarial
fossa is a large rugose boss that prominently emanates
from the nasal. A similar structure was reported for
AMNH 5350 by Prieto-M
arquez (2010a) with the latter
structure being smaller in size and lacking rugose texture.
Further examination of other Gryposaurus notabilis speci-
mens (ROM 873, CMN 2278) revealed minor bulging in
the same area. As currently observed, BYU 13258 is the
only hadrosaurid to exhibit such a large boss with rugosity
on this region of the nasal.
In the postnarial region of the nasal, the element ﬂattens
to a thin mediolaterally oriented platform sloping postero-
dorsally toward the frontal contact. This angled orienta-
tion is different from that seen in other saurolophine
hadrosaurid taxa, which instead possess a relatively hori-
zontal surface. Conﬁguration of the nasofrontal contact
cannot be discerned on the posterior nasal platform.
Figure 6. Palate and braincase of Rhinorex condrupus gen. et
sp. nov., BYU 13528. A, line drawing; B, photograph. The brain-
case elements are not demarcated because weathering has oblit-
erated the deﬁning sutures. Thick lines surrounding elements are
delimiting edges of that element, whereas thin lines are contacts
between bone and rock. Dotted lines are incomplete edges of ele-
ments. Vertical lines in drawing represent rock matrix. Horizon-
tal lines represent broken bone surfaces. Note that the dentary
was omitted from A but is present at the bottom of B. Abbrevia-
tions: CN, cranial nerve; Mx, maxilla; Pal, palatine; Pta, anterior
process of pterygoid; Ptq, quadrate process of pterygoid; Vo,
vomer. Scale bar D10 cm.
New hadrosaurid from the Campanian of Utah 7
The jugal (Fig. 3) is typical for kritosaurin (sensu Prieto-
arquez 2014) species (Gates & Sampson 2007;
arquez 2014) with a long pointed anterior process
ﬁtting partially between the maxilla and lacrimal, a sig-
moidal ventral margin of the anterior region, and an
enlarged lacrimal process. The triangular posteroventral
process of the anterior region is wider than tall, and over-
all less robust than on G. monumentensis (RAM 6797).
Unlike most other species, which have a slightly to exag-
gerated posteriorly inclined postorbital process, this fea-
ture is positioned at 90relative to the body of the jugal in
BYU 13528. This condition is more similar to Kritosaurus
arquez 2014; although one Gryposaurus
specimen from the Two Medicine Formation (MOR
553S-8-26-9-54) also shares this condition (A. Prieto-
arquez pers. comm.). The posteroventral ﬂange does
not differ from any Gryposaurus species (Gates & Samp-
son 2007) and the posterior process is not preserved for
either the left or right jugal.
Only the posteroventral section of the right lacrimal is
preserved in BYU 13258 (Fig. 3B). As in kritosaurin spe-
cies the jugal buttress is quite robust (Gates & Sampson
arquez 2014), protruding posteriorly into
the orbit as in Saurolophus osborni (e.g. AMNH 5220,
CMN 8796), Acristavus (MOR 1155), Edmontosaurus
annectens (e.g. NCSM 23119), some specimens of Bra-
chylophosaurus (e.g. MOR 794), and slightly in some
specimens of Maiasaura (e.g. ROM 447701).
The frontal (Fig. 5) appears to match the morphology of
Kritosaurus navajovius (AMNH 5799) more closely than
other species of saurolophine in that it is highly angled
posterodorsally, as opposed to being nearly horizontal.
Erosion of the frontonasal suture reveals what may be the
centrally positioned fossae that accept posterior processes
from the nasals, a characteristic unique to Gryposaurus
Figure 7. Dentary of Rhinorex condrupus gen. et sp. nov., BYU 13528. A, general view medially; B, close up of dentary teeth in medial
view. Scale bars D5 cm.
8 T. A. Gates and R. Scheetz
species (Horner 1992), yet this structure is ambiguous on
BYU 13528. The frontal also contributes a small portion
to the orbital rim. Inﬁltration of the parietal into the fron-
tal is obscured due to erosion.
Weathering has obliterated the external contacts with
adjacent bones, making it difﬁcult to know exact dimen-
sions of this element. The orbital margin is rugose, but
weathering has likely diminished the true magnitude of
bone texturing. Descending ventrally, the jugal process is
generally similar to other kritosaurins, but seems to pro-
ceed at a more vertical angle, especially at the distalmost
end where other species tend to have a posteriorly angled
process (Fig. 3; Gates & Sampson 2007). Ascending
posterodorsally, the squamosal process meets its counter-
part in a bifurcated contact, forming the temporal bar
that resides at an angle of 40from the horizontal, as
measured from the right temporal bar. Farke & Herrero
(in press) found that the ﬂexion of the postorbital was
correlated with the maximum width of the skull at the
orbits. BYU 13528 has a skull width of approximately
190 mm, which when applied to the dataset presented by
Farke & Herrero (in press), provides a Spearman’s r of
0.597 and a permutation p-value of 0.053, meaning
statistically insigniﬁcant correlation between postorbital
angulation and skull width. Yet, Farke & Herrero (in
press) acquired a correlation (p-value D0.039) between
these variables without the inclusion of BYU 13528.
Therefore, it appears that the angle of ascension seen in
BYU 13528 falls outside the variation of Gryposaurus
specimens in their study. The anterodorsal corner of the
infratemporal fenestra arches more gently than other
hadrosaurid species. Finally, we should note that the
postorbital angulation is a character shared with Krito-
arquez 2014). We should note there is
distortion of the posterior skull, in that the left side squa-
mosals are slightly displaced dorsally compared to the
right side. This alteration could conceivably depress the
right side of the skull, making the true angulation even
greater than reported here.
The anterior, or postorbital, process of the squamosal
inclines steeply anteroventrally, connecting with the post-
orbital to form the temporal bar (Fig. 3). The precotyloid
fossa is relatively shallow, not as incised as in Gryposau-
rus monumentensis (Gates & Sampson 2007). Little can
be described of the quadrate cotylus and the precotyloid
and postcotyloid processes due to breakage. Medially, the
squamosals do not appear to contact, but the sagittal
region is slightly damaged. The median processes form an
anteroposteriorly protracted overhang, which differs from
Edmontosaurus annectens (e.g. NCSM 23119),
Maiasaura (e.g. TCMI 2001.89.2) and Prosaurolophus
(e.g. CMN 2870) that have median squamosal processes
that are inclined posteroventrally. The median processes
of BYU 13528 also bend anteriorly towards the sagittal
midline. The supraoccipital can be seen just below and
posterior to the squamosals, offsetting the postcotyloid
processes from the squamosals (Fig. 5). This conﬁguration
does not differ from Gryposaurus species.
Rhinorex condrupus is unique in the morphology of the
entire anterior margin of the infratemporal fenestra, which
when the conﬂuent processes of the jugal and postorbital
are joined, form a straight, vertical margin (Fig. 3). This
differs from all other hadrosaurids in that there is an over-
all trend of anteroventral deﬂection of the combined jugal
and postorbital processes that form the anterior margin of
the infratemporal fenestra. At its peak, the infratemporal
fenestra approaches 80 mm higher than the dorsal margin
of the orbital cavity. This taller development of the fenes-
tra compared to the orbit could be the largest height differ-
ence within hadrosaurids and is a result of the highly
inclined temporal bar. Despite the unique fenestra mor-
phology observed in BYU 13258, we are reluctant to con-
sider the discussed traits as species-speciﬁc apomorphies
until other referred specimens conﬁrm the infratemporal
conﬁguration and give insights to the posterior margin.
Despite exposure of the endocranium (Fig. 6), little infor-
mation can be gleaned due to weathering and erosion of
the element sutures. All cranial nerves are observable, not
differing in position or relative size compared to other
The palatal elements (Fig. 6) in BYU 13528 are in
complete articulation; however, clear observation of
morphology is only available for the vomer. The
vomerpterygoid articulation is seen, with the anterior
process of the pterygoid clearly overlapping the posterior
process of the vomer. The pterygoid is marginally seen
overlapping the posterior maxilla and the palatine slightly
anterior. Little can be seen of the palatinemaxilla
Paired vomers are preserved in articulation within BYU
13258, but only the left is fully observable (Fig. 6). The
elongated paddle-shape of the posterior region of the
New hadrosaurid from the Campanian of Utah 9
vomer is nearly identical to that seen in UMNH VP
13970, a specimen referred by Gates & Sampson (2007)
as a juvenile Gryposaurus monumentensis, as well as the
type specimen of that species, RAM 6797. Noting the var-
iation described in Gates & Sampson (2007), it seems that
the vomer is a potentially diagnostic element, at least at
the genus level, and possibly to species level. The vomer
present in BYU 13258 possesses an excavated vomer
body. The latter specimen maintains complete closure
around the entire excavation, unlike RAM 6797 that has
the lower margin of the vomer also removed. UMNH VP
13970 has a subcircular excavation in the middle of the
element with all margins closed, which means that either
the vomer undergoes considerable reconstruction through
ontogeny, the specimen has been misidentiﬁed, or there is
extreme variation in this element among individuals.
The dentary is broken through the anterior half (Fig. 3).
The posterior half is robust, as seen in other Gryposaurus
species (Gates & Sampson 2007), with the posteroventral
portion of the coronoid process articulated with the suran-
gular. The remainder of the right coronoid is covered with
matrix, whereas the left coronoid shows a typical hadro-
saurid morphology of anteroposterior expansion with
exclusion of the surangular from the distalmost region.
Dentary teeth (Fig. 7) are ornamented with a single
median ridge, posteriorly offset, and mostly straight (only
a small portion are distally curved). At least three, and
likely up to ﬁve, make up each tooth family.
Both a parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analysis
were performed on the data matrix included in the Supple-
mental Material. This matrix consists of 50 OTUs, 236
characters taken mainly from Prieto-M
using Iguanodon bernissartensis as the outgroup. The par-
simony analysis was performed in TNT (Goloboff et al.
2003) with 1000 Wagner tree replicates and tree bisection
reconnection (saving 100 trees per replicate). The 120
most parsimonious trees obtained a tree length of 682
with a Consistency Index of 0.498 and Retention Index of
Each saved individual tree yielded a monophyletic
Gryposaurus clade, with Rhinorex condrupus outside of
the genus. G. latidens is the next taxon up the tree, with
G. notabilis and G. monumentensis as sister taxa.
Although retained in the majority rule tree, the strict con-
sensus tree collapses the Gryposaurus clade (Fig. 8).
Notable differences between the trees recovered in this
analysis compared to the recent studies of Prieto-M
(2012) and Godefroit et al.(2012) involve the position of
the genera Kritosaurus,Wulagasaurus and Edmontosau-
rus. Firstly, Kritosaurus is placed by both Prieto-M
(2012) and Godefroit et al.(2012) near the genus Grypo-
saurus, yet here the analysis placed it as the most basal
saurolophine clade. Next, Wulagasaurus is a taxon known
from few skull elements and has been placed toward the
base of Saurolophinae (Godefroit et al.2012) or at the
base of a clade containing the Kritosaurini (sensu Prieto-
arquez (2012)). In this study Wulagasaurus is placed at
the base of a clade containing Brachylophosaurini (sensu
Gates et al.2011), as posited by Xing et al.(2012).
arquez (2012) placed Edmontosaurus as a basal
clade within Saurolophinae, whereas this study and Gode-
froit et al.(2012) place the genus nearer Prosaurolophus.
The Bayesian analysis was run in MrBayes 3.2 (Ron-
quist et al.2012) with 10 million generations, sampling
every 5000 generations, standard data, equal and variable
rates, and 25% burn-in. A complete list of analysis set-
tings can be found in the Supplemental Material. The tree
produced through the variable rate model (average stan-
dard deviation of split frequencies from last one million
generations equalled 0.008; harmonic mean 3497.86;
Fig. 9) did not differ substantially from that of a ﬁxed
(equal) rate model (harmonic mean 3499.18) in topol-
ogy. That said, both the ﬁxed rate and variable rate trees
are superﬁcially similar to the variable model of Prieto-
arquez (2010c) in that Lambeosaurinae is nested within
the Saurolophinae instead of being a sister clade, thereby
making Saurolophinae paraphyletic. This topology is
extremely different from that of the parsimony analysis,
and given the current fossil record, seems quite unlikely.
Other small variations are present between these trees, yet
given that this avenue of hadrosaurid phylogenetic inquiry
is still new, we feel that subtle discrepancies should best
be discussed pending further investigation of model
parameters on varying datasets. Evans (2010) analyzed a
phylogenetic dataset through Bayesian algorithms, and
even though that dataset focused only on lambeosaurine
taxa, expansion of this alternative data to saurolophines
may provide more insight to the non-traditional results
presented here and in Prieto-M
Following the North American hadrosaurid biostrati-
graphical framework of Gates et al.(2012, ﬁg. 4, Rhinorex
condrupus labelled as Gryposaurus sp. nov.) and the older
approximate ages for the type locality of R. condrupus,
this new species lived at approximately the same time as
Gryposaurus notabilis and/or Gryposaurus monumenten-
sis,Prosaurolophus maximus and an undescribed taxon
from Big Bend National Park in Texas. Alternatively, if
the younger ages are considered, the only known
10 T. A. Gates and R. Scheetz
hadrosaurid taxon that may have lived simultaneously
with R. condrupus is Prosaurolophus maximus (McGarr-
ity et al.2013). North American hadrosaurid taxa are rela-
tively sparse for the younger time period, making this
chronozone especially important for understanding shifts
in hadrosaurid diversity during the Campanian.
Biogeographical and environmental context
Rhinorex condrupus was discovered in the Book Cliffs of
central Utah, within estuarine sediments deposited by a
river on the margin of the Western Interior Seaway
(Anderson et al.1999). This is the ﬁrst hadrosaurid spe-
cies known from central Utah, whereas two species of
Gryposaurus,G. sp. and G. monumentensis (Gates et al.
2012,2013), were found only 250 km south-west, in
southern Utah. Due to the dating uncertainty for the R.
condrupus type locality, it is uncertain whether this new
taxon existed contemporaneously with the aforemen-
tioned Gryposaurus species. If so, this is one of the most
dramatic cases of dinosaurian habitat partitioning
recorded; especially when one considers the relatively
short distance between occurrences in relation to the large
body size of these species.
Sediments of the Kaiparowits Formation in southern
Utah record a more upland, alluvial-style swamp environ-
ment compared to the coastal, tidally inﬂuenced swamp of
the Book Cliffs. One could speculate that such differences
in habitat could have created different plant communities
that may have led to the segregation of these hadrosaurs.
Figure 8. Maximum parsimony consensus trees. A, majority rule; B, strict consensus. Numbers are Bremer support values. Iguanodon
bernissartensis was used as the outgroup.
New hadrosaurid from the Campanian of Utah 11
However, without better assessment of the local plant
communities and more accurate dating of the Neslen For-
mation, and the R. condrupus type locality in particular,
such ecological speculation has no foundation. Nonethe-
less, it is worth noting that R. condrupus is the ﬁrst of the
Gryposaurus clade to be found in a marine inﬂuenced
environment (although Prieto-M
arquez (2014) assigned
YPM-PU 16970 from the Bearpaw Shale to Gryposaurus
sp.), and that the previous hypothesis that members of the
genus were more likely generalist feeders (Gates &
Sampson 2007) possibly gains support given an increase
in the breadth of environmental preferences seen in hadro-
saurids exhibiting a ‘gryposaur’-type morphology.
Rhinorex is not the ﬁrst hadrosaurid taxon to be found
near marine sediments (see Horner et al.2004 for list of
taxa). Kritosaurus (sensu Prieto-M
arquez 2014) speci-
mens from the Cerro del Pueblo Formation are also pre-
served in nearly identical environments (Eberth et al.
arquez (2014) supported previous phylo-
genetic hypotheses that the genera Kritosaurus and Gry-
posaurus are closely related, which may indicate a similar
habitat preference for R. condrupus and Kritosaurus sp.
In addition to the environmental similarities mentioned
above, there are a couple of features of the Rhinorex con-
drupus skull that generally differ from Gryposaurus spe-
cies but are present in Kritosaurus specimens. First, the
large anterior maxillary foramen is generally positioned
closer to and slightly hidden by the lateroventral process
of the premaxilla (RAM 6797, ROM 873, but see the
slightly more lateral position of CMN 2278), whereas on
R. condrupus and Kritosaurus horneri (BYU 12950;
arquez 2014) the foramen is positioned well pos-
terior to the contact with the posterolateral premaxillary
process. Secondly, the postorbital process of the jugal is
oriented vertically, as opposed to slightly inclined as in
Gryposaurus species (Gates & Sampson 2007). Kritosau-
rus species have a vertical postorbital process (Prieto-
arquez 2014). Despite Kritosaurus spp. and Gryposau-
rus spp. resolving in different clades on the cladograms
presented in Figures 8 and 9, these taxa do seem closely
related based on gross morphology, and R. condrupus
superﬁcially seems to be even more similar to Kritosaurus
spp. than other Gryposaurus species. Interestingly, if the
later radiometric date is taken for the R. condrupus local-
ity, then this places the taxon within a small window of
time from which no hadrosaurids are known from the
south-western USA, just after the last occurrence of G.
monumentensis (Gates et al.2013) and prior to the ﬁrst
occurrences of Kritosaurus in the Kirtland Formation
around 73.5 Ma (Gates & Evans 2005; Gates et al.2012).
Hadrosaurid phylogenetic conﬂict
Over the past decade, hadrosaurid phylogenetic informa-
tion has increased dramatically through the naming of
many new species and increasing the number of phyloge-
netic traits used in analyses. The rapid inﬂux of traits
Figure 9. Bayesian phylogenetic consensus tree with uncalibrated branch lengths. Iguanodon bernissartensis was used as the outgroup.
Numbers are branch length values.
12 T. A. Gates and R. Scheetz
within published phylogenies has also produced as many
conﬂicting cladistic hypotheses as there are publications.
Here we utilize the program SplitsTree 4.13.1 (Huson &
Bryant 2006) to easily visualize areas of conﬂicting posi-
tion of terminal taxa within sets of phylogenetic trees.
SplitsTree 4.13.1 produces networks from inputted phylo-
genetic trees in order to identify taxa that change position
throughout the selection of trees as well as mapping the
changes in position. Those OTUs that do not move around
the tree will be represented by a single line, whereas those
that do move will have multiple lines linked to other taxa
with which they are found through the sampled trees. Split
networks do not necessarily convey any evolutionary rela-
tionships in the way phylogenetic trees are designed
(Huson & Bryant 2006). We used trees derived from the
strict consensus analyses above and those of Prieto-
arquez (2010c) and Godefroit et al.(2012) to test for
conﬂict between presented tree topologies.
Most iguanodontian relationships remained stable
through the trees (Fig. 10); however, severe conﬂict was
found within the Saurolophinae. The web of connections
seen within the clade demonstrates that subclades close to
Gryposaurus spp. and Prosaurolophus are labile on the
tree, but the taxa within those clades are relatively stable.
There was minor conﬂict in the placement of Wulagasau-
rus, and the relationships within the Brachylophosaurini.
Here we present Rhinorex condrupus, a new saurolophine
hadrosaurid from the Upper Cretaceous Neslen Formation
of central Utah. This species is diagnosed on a unique fea-
ture of the nasal, the anteroventral nasal process with a
small dorsal projection that gives an overall ‘ﬁsh hook’
appearance to the area, as well as the lateroventral process
of the premaxilla displaying a dorsal exaggeration. Other
characters that aid differentiation of this species are the
lack of an osseous nasal ornamentation, a large boss on
the circumnarial fossa, a series of protuberances rising on
the medial margin of the nasal, and a squamosal that rises
at a steeper angle compared to most other hadrosaurid
Figure 10. Supernetwork of parsimony strict consensus trees obtained from this study, Prieto-M
arquez (2010c) and Godefroit et al.
New hadrosaurid from the Campanian of Utah 13
Rhinorex is found in a coastal, tidally inﬂuenced envi-
ronment, which when considered with the other environ-
mental and geographical occurrences (ranging from
southern Canada through Texas and arid uplands through
coastal plain) of the genus Gryposaurus adds additional
evidence to the hypothesis that species of this skull mor-
phology could have been more generalist feeders (Gates
& Sampson 2007). Not tackled, but of critical importance
for future studies of feeding habits and cranial ornamenta-
tion in hadrosaurids, is the supposed difﬁculty of main-
taining nearly identical cranial ornamentation, which
should act as a uniting factor, while at the same time dif-
ferentiating into different species with seemingly different
Finally, new parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic
analyses demonstrate similarity with prior analyses in
basic respects but differ with regard to the placement of
certain mobile taxa. As shown through the use of consen-
sus tree networks, within individual studies those mobile
taxa include basal hadrosauroids and higher order taxa
with sparser skeletal remains. Combining the phyloge-
netic trees from multiple analyses into a single supertree
network shows that overall, little consensus exists
between hadrosaurid phylogenies.
We thank Ken Stadtman for insight into the original excava-
tion and location of the site; Jeff Higgerson for relocating the
excavation site; Austin Andrus, Shamra Smith and Josie New-
bold for initial preparation; Eric Lund for help relocating the
excavation site and preparation expertise; Lindsay Zanno and
Lisa Hertzog for ﬁnal preparation. We thank citizen scientists
Andrea, Claire, and Joshua for their help naming this dinosaur.
Virginia Greene illustrated the reconstruction and palate. Fund-
ing was provided by Patrick O’Connor and the Ohio Univer-
sity Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine Postdoctoral
Fellowship (to TAG) and the National Geographic Waitt
Foundation [#W246-12] (to TAG).
Supplemental material for this article can be accessed at:
Anderson, B. G.,Barrick, R. E.,Droser, M. L. &Stadtman,
K. L. 1999. Hadrosaur skin impressions from the Upper Cre-
taceous Neslen Formation, Book Cliffs, Utah: morphology
and paleoenvironmental context. Pp. 295301 in D. D.
Gillette (ed.) Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah. Utah
Geological Survey, Salt Lake City.
Carr, T. D.,Williamson, T. E.,Britt, B. B. &Stadtman, K.
2011. Evidence for high taxonomic and morphologic tyran-
nosaurid diversity in the Late Cretaceous (late Campanian)
of the American southwest and a new short-skulled tyranno-
saurid from the Kaiparowits Formation of Utah. Naturwis-
Campione, N. E. &Evans, D. C. 2011. Cranial growth and vari-
ation in edmontosaurs (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae): implica-
tions for latest Cretaceous megaherbivore diversity in North
America. PLoS One,6(9), e25186.
Cobban, W. A.,Walaszczyk, I.,Obradovich, J. D. &
McKinney, K. C. 2006. A USGS zonal table for the Upper
Cretaceous Middle Cenomanian-Maastrichtian of the
Western Interior of the United States based on ammonites,
inoceramids, and radiometric ages. U.S. Geological Survey
Open-File Report 2006-1250, 46 pp.
Eberth, D. A.,Delgado-de Jes
us, C. R.,Lerbekmo, J. F.,
Brinkman, D. B.,Rodr
ıguez-de la Rosa, R. A. &
Sampson, S. D. 2004. Cerro del Pueblo Fm (Difunta Group,
Upper Cretaceous), Parras Basin, southern Coahuila,
Mexico: reference sections, age, and correlation. Revista
Mexicana de Ciencias Geol
Evans, D. C. 2010. Cranial anatomy and systematics of Hypa-
crosaurus altispinus, and a comparative analysis of skull
growth in lambeosaurine hadrosaurids (Dinosauria, Ornithi-
schia). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society,159,
Farke, A. A. &Herrero, L. in press. Variation in the skull roof
of the hadrosaur Gryposaurus illustrated by a new specimen
from the Kaiparowits Formation (late Campanian) of south-
ern Utah. Pp. 000000 in D. A. Eberth & D. C. Evans (eds)
Hadrosaurs. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis.
Fisher, D. J.,Erdmann, C. E. &Reeside, J. B. 1960.
Cretaceous and Tertiary formations of the Book Cliffs,
Carbon, Emery, and Grand counties, Utah and Garﬁeld and
Mesa counties, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Profes-
sional Paper,332, 80.
Gates, T. A. &Evans, D. C. 2005. Biogeography of Campanian
hadrosaurid dinosaurs from western North America.
Pp. 3339 in D. R. Braman, F. Therrien, E. B. Koppelhus &
W. Taylor (eds) Dinosaur Park Symposium short papers,
abstracts, and programs. Royal Tyrrell Museum of Paleon-
tology, Drumheller, Alberta.
Gates, T. A.,Horner, J. R.,Hanna, R. R. &Nelson, C. R.
2011. New unadorned hadrosaurine hadrosaurid (Ornitho-
poda: Dinosauria) from the Campanian of North America.
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,31, 798811.
Gates, T. A.,Lund, E. K.,Boyd, C. A.,DeBlieux, D. D.,Titus,
A. L.,Evans, D. C.,Getty, M. A.,Kirkland, J. I. &Eaton,
J. G. 2013. Ornithopod dinosaurs from the Grand Staircase-
Escalante National Monument region, Utah and their role in
paleobiogeographic and macroevolutionary studies.
Pp. 463481 in A. L. Titus & M. A. Loewen (eds) At the
top of the Grand Staircase: The Late Cretaceous of southern
Utah. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis.
Gates, T. A.,Prieto-M
arquez, A. &Zanno, L. E. 2012. Moun-
tain Building Triggered Late Cretaceous North American
Megaherbivore Dinosaur Radiation. PloS One,7(8),
Gates, T. A. &Sampson, S. D. 2007. A new species of Grypo-
saurus (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae) from the Late Campa-
nian Kaiparowits Formation. Zoological Journal of the
Linnean Society,151, 351376.
14 T. A. Gates and R. Scheetz
Gates, T. A.,Sampson, S. D.,Delgado-Jesus, C. R.,Zanno, L.
E.,Eberth, D. A.,Hernandez-Rivera, R.,Martinez, M. C.
A. &Kirkland, J. I. 2007. Velafrons coahuilensis, a new
lambeosaurine hadrosaurid (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda) from
the late Campanian Cerro del Pueblo Formation, Coahuila,
Mexico. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,27,
Gill, J. R. &Hail, W. J. 1975. Stratigraphic sections across
Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale-Mesaverde Group bound-
ary, eastern Utah and western Colorado. U.S. Geological
Survey, Chart OC-68.
Godefroit, P.,Bolotsky,Y. L. &Lauters,P. 2012. A new sau-
rolophine dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of Far Eastern
Russia. PloS One,7(5), e36849.
Goloboff, P.,Farris, J. &Nixon, K. 2003. TNT ver. 1.1: Tree
analysis using new technology. Published by the authors,
Horner, J. R. 1992. Cranial morphology of Prosaurolophus
(Ornithischia: Hadrosauridae) with descriptions of two new
hadrosaurid species and an evaluation of hadrosaurid phylo-
genetic relationships. Museum of the Rockies Occasional
Horner, J. R.,Weishampel, D. B. &Forster, C. 2004. Hadro-
sauridae. Pp. 438463 in D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson &
olska (eds) The Dinosauria. University of California
Huson, D. H. &Bryant, D. 2006. Application of Phylogenetic
Networks in Evolutionary Studies. Molecular Biology and
Izett, G. A.,Cobban,W. A., Obradovich,J. D. &Dalrymple,
G. B. 1998.
Ar age of the Manson impact structure,
Iowa, and correlative impact ejecta in the Crow Creek Mem-
ber of the Pierre Shale (Upper Cretaceous), South Dakota
and Nebraska. Geological Society of America Bulletin,110,
Kirschbaum, M. A. &Hettinger, R. D. 2004. Facies analysis
and sequence stratigraphic framework of upper Campanian
strata (Neslen and Mount Garﬁeld formations, Bluecastle
Tongue of the Castlegate Sandstone, and Moncos Shale),
eastern Book Cliffs, Colorado and Utah. U.S. Geological
Survey Digital Data Series, DDS-69-G, 40.
McGarrity, C. T.,Campione, N. E. &Evans, D. C. 2013. Cra-
nial anatomy and variation on Prosaurolophus maximus
(Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae). Zoological Journal of the Lin-
nean Society,167, 531568.
Parker, L. R. &Balsley, J. K. 1989. Coal mines as localities for
studying dinosaur trace fossils. Pp. 354359 in D. D. Gil-
lette & M. G. Lockley (eds) Dinosaur Tracks and Traces.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
arquez, A. 2010a. The braincase and skull roof of Gry-
posaurus notabilis (Dinosauria, Hadrosauridae), with a
taxonomic revision of the genus. Journal of Vertebrate Pale-
arquez, A. 2010b. Global historical biogeography of
hadrosaurid dinosaurs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean
arquez, A. 2010c. Global phylogeny of hadrosauridae
(Dinosauria: Ornithopoda) using parsimony and Bayesian
methods. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society,159,
arquez, A. 2012. The skull and appendicular skeleton
of Gryposaurus latidens, a saurolophine hadrosaurid (Dino-
sauria: Ornithopoda) from the Early Campanian (Creta-
ceous) of Montana, USA. Canadian Journal of Earth
arquez, A. 2014. Skeletal morphology of Kritosaurus
navajovius (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae) from the Late Cre-
taceous of the North American south-west, with an evalua-
tion of the phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of
Kritosaurini. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology,12,
Renne, P. R.,Mundil, R.,Balco, G.,Min, K. &Ludwig, K. R.
2010. Joint determination of 40K decay constants and
/40K for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and
improved accuracy for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. Geochi-
mica et Cosmochimica Acta,74, 53495367.
Ronquist, F.,Teslenko, M.,van der Mark, P.,Ayres, D. L.,
ohna, S.,Larget, B.,Liu, L.,Suchard,
M. A. &Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efﬁcient
Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice
Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology,61,
Thomson, T.,Irmis, R. &Loewen, M. A. 2013. First occurrence
of a tyrannosaurid dinosaur from the Mesa Verde Group
(Neslen Formation) of Utah: Implications for upper Campa-
nian Laramidian biogeography. Cretaceous Research,43,
Wagner, J. R. &Lehman, T. 2009. An enigmatic new lambeo-
saurine hadrosaur (Reptilia: Dinosauria) from the Upper
Shale Member of the Campanian Aguja Formation of Trans-
Pecos Texas. Journal of Vertebate Paleontology,29,
arquez, A.,Gu, W. &Yu, Tingxiang. 2012.
Re-evaluation and phylogenetic analysis of the hadrosaurine
dinosaur Wulagasaurus dongi from the Maastrichtian of
northeast China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica,50, 160169.
Zanno, L. E.,Loewen, M. A.,Farke, A. A.,Kim, G.-S.,Claes-
sens, L. P. A. M. &McGarrity, C. T. 2013. Late Creta-
ceous theropod dinosaurs of southern Utah. Pp. 504525 in
A. L. Titus & M. A. Loewen (eds) At the top of the Grand
Staircase: The Late Cretaceous of southern Utah. Indiana
University Press, Indianapolis.
New hadrosaurid from the Campanian of Utah 15