ArticlePDF Available

Learning Style Survey: Assessing Your Own Learning Styles Learning Style Survey*: Assessing Your Own Learning Styles A -Total

Authors:

Abstract

The Learning Style Survey is designed to assess your general approach to learning. It does not predict your behavior in every instance, but it is a clear indication of your overall style preferences. For each item, circle the response that represents your approach. Complete all items. There are eleven major activities representing twelve different aspects of your learning style. When you read the statements, try to think about what you generally do when learning. It generally takes about 30 minutes to complete the survey. Do not spend too much time on any item – indicate your immediate feeling and move on to the next item.
Learning Style Survey: Assessing Your Own Learning Styles 1
Learning Style Survey*:
Assessing Your Own Learning Styles
Andrew D. Cohen, Rebecca L. Oxford, and Julie C. Chi
The Learning Style Survey is designed to assess your general approach to learning. It does not
predict your behavior in every instance, but it is a clear indication of your overall style preferences.
For each item, circle the response that represents your approach. Complete all items. There are
eleven major activities representing twelve different aspects of your learning style. When you read
the statements, try to think about what you generally do when learning. It generally takes about 30
minutes to complete the survey. Do not spend too much time on any item – indicate your immediate
feeling and move on to the next item.
For each item, circle your response:
0 = Never
1 = Rarely
2 = Sometimes
3 = Often
4 = Always
Part 1: HOW I USE MY PHYSICAL SENSES
1. I remember something better if I write it down. 0 1 2 3 4
2. I take detailed notes during lectures. 0 1 2 3 4
3. When I listen, I visualize pictures, numbers, or words in my head. 0 1 2 3 4
4. I prefer to learn with TV or video rather than other media. 0 1 2 3 4
5. I use color-coding to help me as I learn or work. 0 1 2 3 4
6. I need written directions for tasks. 0 1 2 3 4
7. I have to look at people to understand what they say. 0 1 2 3 4
8. I understand lectures better when professors write on the board. 0 1 2 3 4
9. Charts, diagrams, and maps help me understand what someone says. 0 1 2 3 4
10. I remember peoples’ faces but not their names. 0 1 2 3 4
A - Total
11. I remember things better if I discuss them with someone. 0 1 2 3 4
12. I prefer to learn by listening to a lecture rather than reading. 0 1 2 3 4
13. I need oral directions for a task. 0 1 2 3 4
14. Background sound helps me think. 0 1 2 3 4
15. I like to listen to music when I study or work. 0 1 2 3 4
16. I can understand what people say even when I cannot see them. 0 1 2 3 4
17. I remember peoples’ names but not their faces. 0 1 2 3 4
18. I easily remember jokes that I hear. 0 1 2 3 4
19. I can identify people by their voices (e.g., on the phone). 0 1 2 3 4
20. When I turn on the TV, I listen to the sound more than I watch 0 1 2 3 4
the screen. B - Total
2 Maximizing Study Abroad
21. I’d rather start to do things, rather than pay attention to directions. 0 1 2 3 4
22. I need frequent breaks when I work or study. 0 1 2 3 4
23. I need to eat something when I read or study. 0 1 2 3 4
24. If I have a choice between sitting and standing, I’d rather stand. 0 1 2 3 4
25. I get nervous when I sit still too long. 0 1 2 3 4
26. I think better when I move around (e.g., pacing or tapping my feet). 0 1 2 3 4
27. I play with or bite on my pens during lectures. 0 1 2 3 4
28. Manipulating objects helps me to remember what someone says. 0 1 2 3 4
29. I move my hands when I speak. 0 1 2 3 4
30. I draw lots of pictures (doodles) in my notebook during lectures. 0 1 2 3 4
C - Total
Part 2: HOW I EXPOSE MYSELF TO LEARNING SITUATIONS
1. I learn better when I work or study with others than by myself. 0 1 2 3 4
2. I meet new people easily by jumping into the conversation. 0 1 2 3 4
3. I learn better in the classroom than with a private tutor. 0 1 2 3 4
4. It is easy for me to approach strangers. 0 1 2 3 4
5. Interacting with lots of people gives me energy. 0 1 2 3 4
6. I experience things first and then try to understand them. 0 1 2 3 4
A - Total
7. I am energized by the inner world (what I’m thinking inside). 0 1 2 3 4
8. I prefer individual or one-on-one games and activities. 0 1 2 3 4
9. I have a few interests, and I concentrate deeply on them. 0 1 2 3 4
10. After working in a large group, I am exhausted. 0 1 2 3 4
11. When I am in a large group, I tend to keep silent and listen. 0 1 2 3 4
12. I want to understand something well before I try it. 0 1 2 3 4
B - Total
Part 3: HOW I HANDLE POSSIBILITIES
1. I have a creative imagination. 0 1 2 3 4
2. I try to find many options and possibilities for why something 0 1 2 3 4
happens.
3. I plan carefully for future events. 0 1 2 3 4
4. I like to discover things myself rather than have everything 0 1 2 3 4
explained to me.
5. I add many original ideas during class discussions. 0 1 2 3 4
6. I am open-minded to new suggestions from my peers. 0 1 2 3 4
A - Total
7. I focus in on a situation as it is rather than thinking about how 0 1 2 3 4
it could be.
8. I read instruction manuals (e.g., for computers or VCRs) before 0 1 2 3 4
using the device.
Learning Style Survey: Assessing Your Own Learning Styles 3
9. I trust concrete facts instead of new, untested ideas. 0 1 2 3 4
10. I prefer things presented in a step-by-step way. 0 1 2 3 4
11. I dislike it if my classmate changes the plan for our project. 0 1 2 3 4
12. I follow directions carefully. 0 1 2 3 4
B - Total
Part 4: HOW I DEAL WITH AMBIGUITY AND WITH DEADLINES
1. I like to plan language study sessions carefully and do lessons 0 1 2 3 4
on time or early.
2. My notes, handouts, and other school materials are carefully 0 1 2 3 4
organized.
3. I like to be certain about what things mean in a target language. 0 1 2 3 4
4. I like to know how rules are applied and why. 0 1 2 3 4
A - Total
5. I let deadlines slide if I’m involved in other things. 0 1 2 3 4
6. I let things pile up on my desk to be organized eventually. 0 1 2 3 4
7. I don’t worry about comprehending everything. 0 1 2 3 4
8. I don’t feel the need to come to rapid conclusions about a topic. 0 1 2 3 4
B - Total
Part 5: HOW I RECEIVE INFORMATION
1. I prefer short and simple answers rather than long explanations. 0 1 2 3 4
2. I ignore details that do not seem relevant. 0 1 2 3 4
3. It is easy for me to see the overall plan or big picture. 0 1 2 3 4
4. I get the main idea, and that’s enough for me. 0 1 2 3 4
5. When I tell an old story, I tend to forget lots of specific details. 0 1 2 3 4
A - Total
6. I need very specific examples in order to understand fully. 0 1 2 3 4
7. I pay attention to specific facts or information. 0 1 2 3 4
8. I’m good at catching new phrases or words when I hear them. 0 1 2 3 4
9. I enjoy activities where I fill in the blank with missing words I hear. 0 1 2 3 4
10. When I try to tell a joke, I remember details but forget the punch line. 0 1 2 3 4
B - Total
Part 6: HOW I FURTHER PROCESS INFORMATION
1. I can summarize information easily. 0 1 2 3 4
2. I can quickly paraphrase what other people say. 0 1 2 3 4
3. When I create an outline, I consider the key points first. 0 1 2 3 4
4. I enjoy activities where I have to pull ideas together. 0 1 2 3 4
5. By looking at the whole situation, I can easily understand someone. 0 1 2 3 4
A - Total
4 Maximizing Study Abroad
6. I have a hard time understanding when I don’t know every word. 0 1 2 3 4
7. When I tell a story or explain something, it takes a long time. 0 1 2 3 4
8. I like to focus on grammar rules. 0 1 2 3 4
9. I’m good at solving complicated mysteries and puzzles. 0 1 2 3 4
10. I am good at noticing even the smallest details regarding some task. 0 1 2 3 4
B - Total
Part 7: HOW I COMMIT MATERIAL TO MEMORY
1. I try to pay attention to all the features of new material as I learn. 0 1 2 3 4
2. When I memorize different bits of language material, I can retrieve 0 1 2 3 4
these bits easily – as if I had stored them in separate slots in my brain.
3. As I learn new material in the target language, I make fine distinctions 0 1 2 3 4
among speech sounds, grammatical forms, and words and phrases.
A - Total
4. When learning new information, I may clump together data by 0 1 2 3 4
eliminating or reducing differences and focusing on similarities.
5. I ignore distinctions that would make what I say more accurate 0 1 2 3 4
in the given context.
6. Similar memories become blurred in my mind; I merge new 0 1 2 3 4
learning experiences with previous ones. B - Total
Part 8: HOW I DEAL WITH LANGUAGE RULES
1. I like to go from general patterns to the specific examples in 0 1 2 3 4
learning a target language.
2. I like to start with rules and theories rather than specific examples. 0 1 2 3 4
3. I like to begin with generalizations and then find experiences that 0 1 2 3 4
relate to those generalizations.
A - Total
4. I like to learn rules of language indirectly by being exposed to 0 1 2 3 4
examples of grammatical structures and other language features.
5. I don’t really care if I hear a rule stated since I don’t remember 0 1 2 3 4
rules very well anyway.
6. I figure out rules based on the way I see language forms behaving 0 1 2 3 4
over time. B - Total
Learning Style Survey: Assessing Your Own Learning Styles 5
Part 9: HOW I DEAL WITH MULTIPLE INPUTS
1. I can separate out the relevant and important information in a 0 1 2 3 4
given context even when distracting information is present.
2. When I produce an oral or written message in the target language, 0 1 2 3 4
I make sure that all the grammatical structures are in
agreement with each other.
3. I not only attend to grammar but check for appropriate level 0 1 2 3 4
of formality and politeness. A - Total
4. When speaking or writing, a focus on grammar would be at the 0 1 2 3 4
expense of attention to the content of the message.
5. It is a challenge for me to both focus on communication in speech 0 1 2 3 4
or writing while at the same time paying attention to grammatical
agreement (e.g., person, number, tense, or gender).
6. When I am using lengthy sentences in a target language, I get 0 1 2 3 4
distracted and neglect aspects of grammar and style. B - Total
Part 10: HOW I DEAL WITH RESPONSE TIME
1. I react quickly in language situations. 0 1 2 3 4
2. I go with my instincts in the target language. 0 1 2 3 4
3. I jump in, see what happens, and make corrections if needed. 0 1 2 3 4
A - Total
4. I need to think things through before speaking or writing. 0 1 2 3 4
5. I like to look before I leap when determining what 0 1 2 3 4
to say or write in a target language.
6. I attempt to find supporting material in my mind before I 0 1 2 3 4
set about producing language. B - Total
Part 11: HOW LITERALLY I TAKE REALITY
1. I find that building metaphors in my mind helps me deal with 0 1 2 3 4
language (e.g., viewing the language like a machine with
component parts that can be disassembled).
2. I learn things through metaphors and associations with other 0 1 2 3 4
things. I find stories and examples help me learn. A - Total
3. I take learning language literally and don’t deal in metaphors. 0 1 2 3 4
4. I take things at face value, so I like language material that says 0 1 2 3 4
what it means directly. B - Total
6 Maximizing Study Abroad
Understanding your totals
Once you have totaled your points, write the results in the blanks below. Circle the higher number in
each part (if they are close, circle both). Read about your learning styles starting below.
Part 1: Part 5: Part 9:
A ____ Visual A ____ Global A ____ Field-Independent
B ____ Auditory B ____ Particular B ____ Field-Dependent
C ____ Tactile / Kinesthetic
Part 2: Part 6: Part 10:
A ____ Extraverted A ____ Synthesizing A ____ Impulsive
B ____ Introverted B ____ Analytic B ____ Reflective
Part 3: Part 7: Part 11:
A ____ Random-Intuitive A ____ Sharpener A ____ Metaphoric
B ____ Concrete-Sequential B ____ Leveler B ____ Literal
Part 4: Part 8:
A ____ Closure-Oriented A ____ Deductive
B ____ Open B ____ Inductive
Note:
Before reading the next section, understand that this is only a general description of your learning
style preferences. It does not describe you all of the time, but gives you an idea of your tendencies
when you learn. Note that in some learning situations, you may have one set of style preferences and
in a different situation, another set of preferences. Also, there are both advantages and disadvantages to
every style preference.
If on the sensory style preferences (visual, auditory, tactile/kinesthetic) you prefer two or all three of
these senses (i.e., your totals for the categories are within five points or so), you are likely to be
flexible enough to enjoy a wide variety of activities in the language classroom. On the other
dimensions, although they appear to be in opposition, it is possible for you to have high scores on
both, meaning that you do not have a preference one way or the other. Here are three examples: on
the extroverted-introverted distinction, you are able to work effectively with others as well as by
yourself; on the closure-open distinction, you enjoy the freedom of limited structure and can still get
the task done before the deadline without stress; on the global-particular distinction, you can handle
both the gist and the details easily.
Furthermore, learning style preferences change throughout your life, and you can also stretch them,
so don’t feel that you are constrained to one style.
Part 1: HOW I USE MY PHYSICAL SENSES
If you came out as more visual than auditory, you rely more on the sense of sight, and you learn best
through visual means (books, video, charts, pictures). If you are more auditory in preference, you
prefer listening and speaking activities (discussions, lectures, audio tapes, role-plays). If you have a
tactile/kinesthetic style preference, you benefit from doing projects, working with objects, and
moving around (games, building models, conducting experiments).
Learning Style Survey: Assessing Your Own Learning Styles 7
Part 2: HOW I EXPOSE MYSELF TO LEARNING SITUATIONS
If you came out more extraverted on this survey, you probably enjoy a wide range of social,
interactive learning tasks (games, conversations, discussions, debates, role-plays, simulations). If you
came out more introverted, you probably like to do more independent work (studying or reading by
yourself or learning with a computer) or enjoy working with one other person you know well.
Part 3: HOW I HANDLE POSSIBILITIES
If you scored more random-intuitive, you are most likely more future-oriented, prefer what can be
over what is, like to speculate about possibilities, enjoy abstract thinking, and tend to disfavor step-
by-step instruction. If your style preference was more concrete-sequential, you are likely to be more
present-oriented, prefer one-step-at-a-time activities, and want to know where you are going in your
learning at every moment.
Part 4: HOW I APPROACH TASKS
If you are more closure-oriented, you probably focus carefully on most or all learning tasks, strive to
meet deadlines, plan ahead for assignments, and want explicit directions. If you are more open in
your orientation, you enjoy discovery learning (in which you pick up information naturally) and
prefer to relax and enjoy your learning without concern for deadlines or rules.
Part 5: HOW I RECEIVE INFORMATION
If you have a more global style preference, you enjoy getting the gist or main idea and are
comfortable communicating even if you don’t know all the words or concepts. If you are more
particular in preference, you focus more on details and remember specific information about a topic
well.
Part 6: HOW I FURTHER PROCESS INFORMATION
If you are a synthesizing person, you can summarize material well, enjoy guessing meanings and
predicting outcomes, and notice similarities quickly. If you are analytic, you can pull ideas apart and
do well on logical analysis and contrast tasks, and you tend to focus on grammar rules.
Part 7: HOW I COMMIT MATERIAL TO MEMORY
If you are a sharpener, you tend to notice differences and seek distinctions among items as you
commit material to memory. You like to distinguish small differences and to separate memory of
prior experiences from memory of current ones. You can easily retrieve the different items because
you store them separately. You like to make fine distinctions among speech sounds, grammatical
forms, and meaningful elements of language (words and phrases). If you are a leveler, you are likely
to clump material together in order to remember it, by eliminating or reducing differences, and by
focusing almost exclusively on similarities. You are likely to blur similar memories and to merge new
experiences readily with previous ones. If you are concerned about accuracy and getting it all right,
then the sharpener approach is perhaps preferable. If you are concerned about expediency, then
being a leveler may be the key to communication.
Part 8: HOW I DEAL WITH LANGUAGE RULES
If you are a more deductive learner, you like to go from the general to the specific, to apply
generalizations to experience, and to start with rules and theories rather than with specific examples.
If you are a more inductive learner, you like to go from specific to general and prefer to begin with
examples rather than rules or theories.
8 Maximizing Study Abroad
Part 9: HOW I DEAL WITH MULTIPLE INPUTS
If you are more field-independent in style preference, you like to separate or abstract material from
within a given context, even in the presence of distractions. You may, however, have less facility
dealing with information holistically. If you are more field-dependent in preference, you tend to deal
with information in a more holistic or “gestalt” way. Consequently you may have greater difficulty in
separating or abstracting material from its context. You work best without distractions.
Part 10: HOW I DEAL WITH RESPONSE TIME
If you are a more impulsive learner, you react quickly in acting or speaking without thinking the
situation through. For you, thought often follows action. If you are a more reflective learner, you
think things through before taking action and often do not trust your gut reactions. In your case,
action usually follows thought.
Part 11: HOW LITERALLY I TAKE REALITY
If you are a metaphoric learner, you learn material more effectively if you conceptualize aspects of it,
such as the grammar system, in metaphorical terms. You make the material more comprehensible by
developing and applying an extended metaphor to it (e.g., visualizing the grammar system of a given
language as an engine that can be assembled and disassembled). If you are a literal learner, you
prefer a relatively literal representation of concepts and like to work with language material more or
less as it is on the surface.
Tips for the learner
Each style preference offers significant strengths in learning and working. Recognize your strengths
to take advantage of ways you learn best. Also, enhance your learning and working power by being
aware of and developing the style areas that you do not normally use. Tasks that do not seem quite as
suited to your style preferences will help you stretch beyond your ordinary comfort zone, expanding
your learning and working potential.
For example, if you are a highly global person, you might need to learn to pay more attention to
detail in order to learn more effectively. If you are an extremely detail-oriented person, you might be
missing out on some useful global characteristics, like getting the main idea quickly. You can develop
such qualities in yourself through practice. You won’t lose your basic strengths by trying something
new; you will simply develop another side of yourself that is likely to be very helpful to your
language learning.
If you aren’t sure how to attempt new behaviors that go beyond your favored style, then ask your
colleagues, friends, or teachers to give you a hand. Talk with someone who has a different style from
yours and see how that person does it. Improve your learning or working situation by stretching
your style!
*Author’s Note: The format of the Learning Styles Survey and a number of the dimensions and items
are drawn from Oxford’s Style Analysis Survey, 1995, in J. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL
classroom (pp. 208-215). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson International. Other key dimensions
and some of the wording of items comes from Ehrman and Leaver’s E&L Questionnaire, 2001. For
more information on this questionnaire, see the Resources Section of this Guide
... Chen (2010) believes that the most important responsibility of teachers is to understand how the minds of learners' work. A teacher should know that students learn from each other in different ways, which indicates the difference in the learning styles of students (Cohen et al., 2001). Knowing the mental processes in the teaching-learning process is rooted in the cognitive theories of learning that try to explain complex cognitive activities such as understanding, remembering, and learning strategies. ...
... Students who are visual like to have directions printed as opposed to given orally, and may frequently be careless while conceptualizing or attempting to get a handle on another subject. Since visual learners are great at perceiving how ideas and thoughts are associated, they will more often than not succeed in jobs that expect them to utilize visual abilities, go with choices in light of information, or make things utilizing workmanship and plan (Cohen et al., 2001). Auditory style is the second kind of learning style. ...
... The Learning Style Survey was designed by Cohen et al. (2001) to evaluate learners' general way to deal with learning. It does not foresee your conduct in each example; however, it is an obvious sign of students' general style inclinations. ...
Article
Full-text available
Language teachers cannot ignore the role of technology in young language learners’ lives to engage and motivate them. Therefore, the current research investigated the mediating effect of students’ learning and cognitive styles on the relationship between their emotions and situational motivation. 1089 respondents were selected from different colleges and universities, with different ages, genders, and levels. Four questionnaires (Cognitive Scale of the Human–Nature Relationship, Learners’ Emotion Questionnaire, The Situational Motivation Scale, and Learning Style Questionnaire) were employed to collect the data. The researcher used Tencent QQ, a widely used communication platform in China, in conjunction with Wenjuanxing, an online survey tool, to distribute the questionnaire to all participants. The results showed that 54% of changes in students’ situational motivation can be explained by interaction among their emotions, learning, and cognitive styles. In addition, it was revealed that less attention is paid to the mental and psychological aspects of students in technology-enhanced learning environments, and most educational environments do not have the necessary compatibility with the psychological characteristics of students. Implications are presented.
... Learner Guide (Adapted from Cohen et al., 2002) The following strategy guide is designed to help you determine what strategies work best for you when learning a language. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This presentation shares a new curriculum that meets learners’ diverse learning styles, interests, and proficiency levels in a third-year college-level Japanese class. Anyone who has taught a third-year language class would agree that the learners’ proficiency levels in the target language differ significantly when they get to the third-year class. To address students‘ different proficiency levels and diverse learning styles and interests, the curriculum included individualized learning goals alongside the course learning goals. The course was a hybrid, in-person, face-to-face class twice a week and asynchronous class time twice a week. The students used the asynchronous class time to work on the personal goals they set at the beginning of the semester and every two weeks. This curriculum encouraged autonomous learning and self-regulation by using a learning portfolio to set goals, record learning activities, and reflect and reevaluate goals. According to previous studies, merely setting goals does not improve achievement (Schunk 2003). The students were required to reflect on their goals and learning activities every two weeks to set new or revised goals. The presentation will include details about the course structure, data collected from the assessment, and the instructor’s reflections on the course.
... Examples of styles (Cohen, et al., 2006;Ortega, 2009) a) random-intuitive/concrete-sequential Field Dependence/Independence = the degree to which one's psychological functioning is influenced by external sources of information in terms of perception, cognition, and personality (Witkin & Goodenough, 1981;Witkin, et al., 1977) 9 Empirical studies I ➢ Johnson, et al. (2000) RQ: Do individual differences in FD/FI influence L2 oral production? ...
Article
Full-text available
Situated in an era when artificial intelligence has been applied across a wide range of fields, the domain of foreign language education has also gradually integrated new technologies. One representative technology applied in this field is Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). The present study, based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, designs a user acceptance questionnaire for ASR and aims to explore the impact of learning styles on students’ acceptance levels. The results demonstrate that visual, introverted, leveler and deductive learning styles are positively correlated with user acceptance of ASR; kinesthetic and sharpener learning styles are negatively linked to the user acceptance; while auditory and extraverted learning styles do not have significant impact on user acceptance of ASR. The results of this study provide important theoretical foundations and practical guidance for the application of ASR in foreign language education, particularly oral English instruction.
Article
Motivated by the increasing applications of artificial intelligence in education, the present study aimed at developing an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based model for predicting EFL (English as a Foreign Language) achievement levels using data about learners’ variables. Another endeavor of the current survey was to analyze the importance of learners’ differences in predicting EFL achievement: personality traits, perceptual learning style preferences, language learning strategies, motivation, and attitudes. A Likert-response format questionnaire served to gauge the considered learners’ variables. The subjects were 200 Tunisian first-year university students aged 19 to 23, not English-specialized students. As for data analysis procedures, the employment of the alpha internal consistency coefficient was to inform about the reliability of the study instrument, and the ANNs were to give insights into the interconnections among the study variables. The findings postulated that it was practicable to implement systematic ANNs to predict learners’ EFL achievement levels using their individual affective and cognitive factors, as the model achieved an excellent overall accuracy (an accuracy of 97%). Moreover, results proved that using learners’ variables simultaneously provided a better prediction of EFL achievement. The study highly recommends the implementation of ANNs for the analysis of EFL learning to increase its effectiveness.
Article
Full-text available
Learning styles have been a contentious topic in education for years. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the effects of matching instruction to modality learning styles compared to unmatched instruction on learning outcomes. A systematic search of the research findings yielded 21 eligible studies with 101 effect sizes and 1,712 participants for the meta-analysis. Based on robust variance estimation, there was an overall benefit of matching instruction to learning styles, g = 0.31, SE = 0.12, 95% CI = [0.05, 0.57], p = 0.02. However, only 26% of learning outcome measures indicated matched instruction benefits for at least two styles, indicating a crossover interaction supportive of the matching hypothesis. In total, 12 studies without sufficient statistical details for the meta-analysis were also examined for an indication of a crossover effect; 25% of these studies had findings indicative of a crossover interaction. Given the time and financial expenses of implementation coupled with low study quality, the benefits of matching instruction to learning styles are interpreted as too small and too infrequent to warrant widespread adoption.
Article
Currently, the utilization of mobile devices and more specifically mobile language applications is a current ongoing tendency. In line with this trend, this study investigated the linkage between language learning style preferences, class level, and gender on the one hand and the use of mobile applications for EFL learning among university students in Tunisia on the other hand. The considered variables were gauged using a Likert-scale response format questionnaire. The subjects were 180 Tunisian university students at the Higher Institute of Management of Gabes aged 19 to 28. Two data analysis procedures were used: namely, the Spearman Rho correlation giving insight into the correlations among the study variables, and the alpha internal consistency coefficient informing about the reliability of its instrument. Based on the study findings, students’ language learning style preferences proved to have a direct bearing on the use of mobile applications for EFL learning. Concerning the link between class level and mobile applications for EFL learning use, no meaningful relationships were registered between these two variables. As regards the correlation between gender and the use of mobile applications for EFL learning, no significant difference was detected between male students and their female counterparts. Through the achieved results, it is recommended that the interrelationship between students' differences and the use of mobile applications for EFL learning is a field of research that merits further scientific exploration to shed more light on the existing literature regarding the use of mobile applications for EFL learning.
Article
Full-text available
Currently, the utilization of mobile devices and more specifically mobile language applications is a current ongoing tendency. In line with this trend, this study investigated the linkage between language learning style preferences, class level, and gender on the one hand and the use of mobile applications for EFL learning among university students in Tunisia on the other hand. The considered variables were gauged using a Likert-scale response format questionnaire. The subjects were 180 Tunisian university students at the Higher Institute of Management of Gabes aged 19 to 28. Two data analysis procedures were used: namely, the Spearman Rho correlation giving insight into the correlations among the study variables, and the alpha internal consistency coefficient informing about the reliability of its instrument. Based on the study findings, students' language learning style preferences proved to have a direct bearing on the use of mobile applications for EFL learning. Concerning the link between class level and mobile applications for EFL learning use, no meaningful relationships were registered between these two variables. As regards the correlation between gender and the use of mobile applications for EFL learning, no significant difference was detected between male students and their female counterparts. Through the achieved results, it is recommended that the interrelationship between students' differences and the use of mobile applications for EFL learning is a field of research that merits further scientific exploration to shed more light on the existing literature regarding the use of mobile applications for EFL learning.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.