Content uploaded by Theib Oweis
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Theib Oweis on Oct 02, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 5 (2011) 1309-1316
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani”
Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
I.A. Gammoh1 and T.Y. Oweis2
1. Department of Horticulture and Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
2. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria
Received: April 29, 2011 / Accepted: May 30, 2011 / Published: October 20, 2011.
Abstract: Mechanized construction of micro-catchments for water harvesting (WH) was successfully tested in the Badia (dry
rangeland) areas in Syria and Jordan, using the “Vallerani” plow, model Delfino (50 MI/CM), manufactured by Nardi, Italy. The plow
was able to construct intermittent and continuous contour ridges, and could potentially be used to rehabilitate degraded rangelands.
However, one major issue for large-scale implementation is the high cost and time required to manually identify contours for the plow
to follow. Most existing auto-guiding systems, as usually used in road construction and agricultural land leveling, were expensive or
impractical. The objective, therefore, was to add, adapt, and evaluate an auto-guiding system to enable a tractor to follow contours
without demarcation through conventional surveying. A low-cost Contour Laser Guiding (CLG) system, with specifications that suit
the contour ridging in undulating topographic conditions of dry rangelands, was chosen, adapted, mounted, and tested, under actual
field conditions. The system consisted mainly of a portable laser transmitter and a tractor-mounted receiver, connected to a guidance
display panel. The system was field-tested on 95 ha of land where the system capacity was determined under different terrains, slopes
(1-8%), and ridge spacings (4-12 m). The easy adaptation and implementation of the CLG to the “Vallerani” unit tripled the system
capacity, improved efficiency and precision, and substantially reduced the cost of constructing micro-catchments for WH. The system
is recommended for large-scale rangeland rehabilitation projects in the dry areas, not only in West Asia, but worldwide.
Key words: Badia, land degradation, contour micro-catchments, laser guiding, Vallerani system.
1. Background
Micro-catchment water harvesting (WH) systems
have been tested in the dry rangelands for rehabilitation
and combating desertification in these low rainfall
areas. In the Jordanian and Syrian dry rangelands
(Badia), investigations have demonstrated several
successes over hundreds of hectares (Fig. 1). WH
techniques included contour ridges and bunds
implemented along contour lines of sloped areas;
however, most of these techniques have lacked
specialized machinery that supports their
implementation. The conventional methods were slow,
costly, and laborious. Al-Tabini et al. [1] reported that
Corresponding author: I.A. Gammoh, assistant professor,
Ph.D., main research fields: dry land rehabilitation,
mechanization of water harvesting systems. E-mail:
issagammoh@yahoo.com.
the lack of mechanized power (of unconventional
machinery) in establishing WH systems has limited its
large-scale implementation.
Mechanized intermittent and continuous contour
ridging, the so-called “Vallerani” system, was
Fig. 1 Contour water-harvesting micro-catchments
constructed by the Vallerani mechanized system (Badia,
Jordan).
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani” Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
1310
successfully tested for rehabilitating the degraded dry
rangelands in many West-Asian, North African, and
Sub-Saharan African countries as well as in the Badia
and has been the most successful method so far.
In this system, the WH structures are constructed by
a special plough designed to construct open contour
micro-catchments of either a continuous furrow/ridge
or semicircular micro-basins (bunds) at a high capacity
of 400 micro-basins/h, Antinori and Malagnoux et al.
[2, 3] reported up to 700-1200 micro-basins/h. This can
provide substantial soil water storage capacity of
0.200-0.600 m3/bund [4]. In addition, its
implementation provided a low cost and practical
means of constructing the WH systems at 15-20 ha/d [2,
5]. Taking into account the harsh topographic
conditions prevailing in the Badia, such capacity is
acceptable for large-scale implementation.
The “Vallerani” system has been tested by ICARDA
since 1997 in Syria and Jordan as well as many North
African countries; however, it has not reached its
potential capacity due to the slow pace and high cost of
manual layout of the contour lines, which should
precede the implementation. A team of three surveyors
was able to establish contours for only 5 ha/d, which
was considered as a bottleneck in its implementation.
In Syria, research within the project “Communal
Management and Optimization of Mechanized
Micro-catchment Water Harvesting for Combating
Desertification in the East Mediterranean Region” on
the costing of the implementation of the system showed
that manual identification of contour lines preceding
the operation more than doubled the total cost per
hectare of constructing the ridges [6, 7].
To overcome this limitation of the system, this work
aimed at developing a mechanism to guide the tractor
to run automatically along the contour lines without the
need to follow surveyors’ marks. Several GPS-based
auto-guiding systems were considered
(www.trimble.com/agriculture) for this purpose, which
were either very costly and/or very complicated. The
most suitable was a laser-based guiding system (LGS).
The system was first adapted for land-leveling in
agriculture, mining, and road construction applications
in many countries such as Australia, India, Japan, and
the US. The LGS in such applications consists of:
(1) A transmitter of a rotating laser beam. The
transmitter is mounted on a tripod which allows the
laser beam to sweep unobstructed above the tractor,
with the plane of light above the field;
(2) A laser receiver mounted on a mast intercepts the
laser beam, detects the position of the laser reference
and sends a signal to the control panel;
(3) An electrical control panel interprets the signal
from the receiver, magnifies it, and sends an actuating
signal to the tractor hydraulic system;
(4) An electro-hydraulic control valve which controls
oil flow, to raise or lower a leveling bucket or blade.
This system, described by Rickman and Jat et al. [8,
9], requires alteration of the tractor hydraulic system
for installation of the electro-hydraulic control valve. It
also requires much field preparation and a topographic
survey.
Fortunately, contour ridging has no leveler (i.e.
blade or bucket) needing to be lowered and raised by an
electro-hydraulic valve. This encourages the use and
adaptation of the LGS without the control valve
(component (d) mentioned above), and the replacement
of the control panel (component (c) mentioned above)
with a display panel. Therefore, these changes end up
with a simpler Contour Laser Guiding (CLG) system.
Thus, the objective of the current research work was
to improve the capacity of the “Vallerani” mechanized
system in contour ridging by adding, adapting and
evaluating a CLG to enable a tractor to follow the
contour lines “on-the-go” (i.e. without prior marking of
the contour lines).
2. Methodology
The Vallerani WH contour ridging is a heavy load
soil formation that consists of constructing deep (30-60
cm) continuous or intermittent ridges or bunds (pits)
along a contour line. The ridges are made to face the
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani” Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
1311
upstream slope, thus runoff water flowing downstream
is intercepted and collected within the created bund to
infiltrate and fill the soil profile for plant use. The
distance between two successive contour ridges usually
ranges from 4 to 16 m, depending on the runoff
coefficient, soil characteristics, slope, and the plants to
be grown. Therefore, the fall in elevation between
ridges varies accordingly.
The “Vallerani” machine (model Delfino (50
MI/CM), manufactured by Nardi, Italy) was attached to
a 134 HP (98.5 kW) tractor (model L135 TDI, Landini,
Italy) with the CLG devices mounted and operated.
The system was tested on 95.4 ha in the Jordan Badia
in different fields with slopes of range 2-8% and with 4,
6, 8, and 12 m spacing between successive contour
ridges, on 18.2, 17.5, 33.3, and 26.4 ha, respectively.
For all worked fields, the traveling speed in plowing
and the speed in transporting between passes were 3.8
and 6.2 km/h, respectively. Area covered and time
spent, to work fields with different spacing between
successive contour rides, were recorded.
2.1 CLG Devices and the Principle of Operation
The CLG can detect and measure the difference in
elevation between the current tractor position (while
traveling) and that of a reference point in the field as
displayed on a panel in front of the tractor operator.
The operator can easily steer the tractor in a way that
keeps this difference unchanged, thus maintaining
tractor travel on the contour line. In this case, the
required CLG devices are a laser transmitter (1000-m
radius of coverage) mounted on a tripod (Fig. 2), a laser
receiver mounted on a mast (Fig. 3), and an electrical
display panel (Fig. 4) with visual and sound display.
The laser transmitter transmits a rotating laser beam
(in the horizontal plane), which is intercepted by the
laser receiver mounted on a telescopic mast on the
tractor and sends a signal to the display panel. The
display panel interprets the signal from the receiver and
displays signals for the operator. The signals indicate
not only the matching of levels, but also how far (up or
Fig. 2 The laser beam transmitter mounted on a tripod on
uphill side.
Fig. 3 Laser receiver mounted on a telescopic mast on the
tractor.
Fig. 4 Display panel mounted in front of the tractor
operator.
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani” Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
1312
down) the levels do not match, so the operator can
decide where to steer the tractor (left or right) to
maintain travel along the contour. This is true as far as
the beam is intercepted by the receiver. Therefore, the
length of the receiver determines the difference in
elevation that can be detected and determines the time
that the display can show a reading on the panel, and
hence the number of contours worked at the current
position of the receiver.
When switching to the next downhill (or uphill)
contour line, if the receiver can still intercept the laser
beam, then the operator can continue opening ridges
without any adjustments. Otherwise, the operator
should rise (or lower) the receiver on its mast until the
signal is displayed and then continue operation. After
working a number of passes, when it becomes
impossible to raise or lower the receiver on the mast
due to insufficient length of the mast, the transmitter
with its tripod should be either lowered (or raised) or
relocated downhill (or uphill) so the laser beam can
again be intercepted by the receiver.
Providing that the transmitter is located on the uphill
side, the operator, while driving along the contour line,
might face the following five possible guiding
situations and react accordingly (Fig. 5):
(1) The signal on the display panel indicates no
difference in elevation between the laser beam and the
tractor (the tractor is traveling exactly on the contour
line). The operator should keep traveling without
steering right or left;
Fig. 5 Five possible guiding situations (a, b, c, d, and e) met while driving on a contour line with CLG system.
Display signal: No signal: The beam is out of the
receiver range
Reaction: Knowing that the last glowing light was the
right one, TURN LEFT to get back the signal
(d)
Display signal: No signal: The beam is out of the
receiver range
Reaction: Knowing that the last glowing light was the
left one, TURN RIGHT to get back the signal
(e)
Display signal: central green light: Zero
elevation difference, the tractor on the
contour
Reaction: KEEP TRAVELLING
Receiver
Laser beam
Display
panel
(a)
Display signal: right red light: Elevation
difference, the tractor is downhill
Reaction: TURN LEFT
Display signal: left red light:
Elevation difference, the tractor is
uphill
Reaction: TURN RIGHT
(b)
(c)
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani” Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
1313
(2) The signal on the display panel indicates an
increased difference in elevation between the laser
beam and the tractor (the tractor is downhill of the
contour line). The operator should turn the steering left
(uphill) to reinstate the zero difference;
(3) The signal on the display panel indicates
decreased difference in elevation between the laser
beam and the tractor (the tractor is uphill of the contour
line). The operator should turn the steering right
(downhill) to reinstate the zero difference;
(4) Passing through situation (2), the operator
reacted incorrectly and continued driving downhill
until the display signal has been lost. The operator
should turn the steering left (uphill) to catch the signal
and reinstate a zero difference;
(5) Passing through situation (3), the operator
reacted incorrectly, and continued driving uphill until
the display signal has been lost. The operator should
turn the steering right (downhill) to catch the signal and
reinstate a zero difference.
Therefore, the operator may react differently in each
situation to maintain travel along the contour line. A
skilled operator should work within the first three
possibilities described, i.e. (1), (2), or (3).
2.2 Determining System Capacity
The actual field capacity (AFC) of the system,
measured in ha/hr for each field, was determined by
dividing the area worked over actual time spent as
measured in the field [10].
In evaluating the appropriateness of the CLG in
practical implementation of contour ridging under
prevailing conditions, the following parameters were
determined:
(1) The number of contour ridges (B) that can be
worked without any need to readjust the position of the
receiver on the mast.
B = L/H (Rounded to the nearest whole number),
Where,
L is length of photocells on the receiver. In the
installed devices, (L = 31 cm);
H is the fall in elevation when moving from an uphill
to the next downhill ridge in cm. H = percentage slope
× ridge spacing.
(2) The number of ridges (C) that can be constructed
without any need to lower (or raise) the transmitter on
the tripod or to relocate it downhill (or uphill).
C = D/H (Rounded to the nearest whole number),
where
D is adjustable difference in elevation between the
transmitter and the receiver on the mast according to
ordered devices (D = 120 cm).
The parameters B and C can be considered as
reasonable indicators for high performance during
ridging application on-the-go. The higher they are the
less action is required from the operator while traveling
and consequently the higher the capacity and
automation level of the system. Inversely, the lower B
and C are the greater is the number of adjustments
required.
3. CLG System Performance
The operation was successful in that the ridges were
constructed on the contour lines (as checked by
conventional topography survey instruments), and the
operator was able to easily acquire the guiding skills
within one or two passes.
The average AFC (ha/h) of the system was directly
proportional to the spacing between WH ridges (Table 1).
It ranged from 0.8 ha/h with 4-m spacing to 2.6 ha/h
with 12-m spacing. With the accustomed spacing
followed in the Badia (the 8-m), the AFC averaged 1.8
ha/h, which is equivalent to 18 ha/day in a 10-hours
working day. The overall averaged AFC for all tested
spacings resulted in a 16 ha/day (Table 1). This
obviously showed that the use of CLG system has
eliminated the low implementation pace of Vallerani
WH system when traditional land surveying was used.
The parameters B and C were determined for
different slopes and different spacings between ridges
(Table 2). For example, with slope of 4% and contour
spacing of 8 m (giving a 9-m effective working width),
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani” Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
1314
Table 1 Area (A) and actual field capacity (AFC) as measured for different spacing between successive ridges in all test fields
(Jordanian Badia), with average AFC for different spacings and the overall average AFC of all fields and spacings.
Ridge spacing 4 m 6 m 8 m 12 m
A (ha) AFC (ha/h) A (ha) AFC (ha/h) A (ha) AFC (ha/h) A (ha) AFC (ha/h)
Test fields
Field 1 2.4 0.68 2.9 0.98 4.8 1.76 7.1 2.59
Field 2 5.8 0.85 3.1 1.02 6.5 1.83 9.4 2.64
Field 3 2.9 0.79 3.4 1.20 3.4 1.81 9.9 2.63
Field 4 3.6 0.81 6.4 1.26 12.4 1.88 - -
Field 5 3.5 0.82 1.7 1.09 4.2 1.85 - -
Field 6 - - - - 2.0 1.80 - -
Average
0.79 1.11 1.82 2.62
Overall Av. AFC 1.59
Table 2 Numbers of ridges that can be made on-the-go before adjusting the receiver (B), and before adjusting the transmitter
(C), calculated for different slopes and spacings between contour ridges.
Slope
To 2% To 4% To 6% To 8%
B C B C B C B C
Ridges spacing (m)
4 4 15 2 7 or 8 1 or 2 5 1 3 or 4
6 2 or 3 10 1 or 2 5 1 3 or 4 1 2 or 3
8 1 or 2 7 1 3 or 4 1 2 or 3 1 1 or 2
12 1 5 1 2 or 3 1 1 or 2 1 1
the operator needed to adjust the receiver each pass (B
= 1) and the elevation of the transmitter every fifth pass
(C = 4). Assuming that the average length of the passes
in such a case was 500 m, thus the area covered was
500m × 9 m × 4 passes, which is equal to 1.8 ha. This
area was doubled with a slope of 2% and contour
spacing of 4 m (Table 2). Furthermore, the automation
level was considerably improved (B = 4 and C = 15).
This is a quite acceptable system efficiency and is
appropriate to the application.
The number of adjustments was clearly increased
(low B and C) with increases in both spacing between
ridges and slope (Table 2). Fortunately, in WH systems,
the steeper the slope the smaller the spacing between
the ridges should be. Therefore, the shaded numbers of
B and C (Table 2) describe techniques that are
practically not used.
The CLG system devices that were installed and
adapted to be used in this work are similar to those used
in land leveling applications, where slopes are mild or
zero. Therefore, the relatively frequent adjustment and
relocation of the transmitter and receiver (low numbers
of B and C) indicate somehow a weakness in the
guiding system. Such a weakness can be overcome by:
(1) Using a longer receiver and a taller mast
especially manufactured for contour ridging;
(2) Using an electro-adjustable mast, so the operator
can relocate the receiver while driving;
(3) Planning the field works to allow construction of
long rather than short contour ridges by switching from
one hill to an adjacent one, and choosing suitable
locations for the transmitter to cover long fields of
similar slope.
The implementation of the CLG on the “Vallerani”
unit was successful in that the operation was accurately
along the contour and the cost of contour layout was
substantially reduced. The surveying works were
completely eliminated from WH operation. The
potential capacity of the mechanized contour ridging
was, therefore, achieved by being able to lay out
contour lines on-the-go for 15-20 ha/d. Following are
some of additional advantages, compared with
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani” Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
1315
conventional surveyed contour ridging:
(1) Time and effort saving: In large-scale
implementation of WH structures it is critical to start
and finish land preparation before the first rain. This
aids timeliness and hence improves WH systems
management;
(2) Cost reduction: Traditional land surveying
(surveyors and equipment) is more costly than CLG,
especially if considered over many years, and bearing
in mind that the targeted areas of interventions have
low productivity;
(3) Ease of operation: While traditional surveying
needs at least two skilled surveyors, the CLG can be
operated by one operator with minimum training;
(4) High accuracy: The tractor driver usually moves
between marks pegged by surveyors in straight lines,
which affects the accuracy of tracing contour lines.
However, in CLG the operator is continuously guided
to trace the contours. This ensures even elevation
inside the catchments and thus ensures an even
distribution of harvested water along them. In addition,
sometimes tractor drivers are confused by closely
spaced adjacent surveyors’ marks and drive toward the
wrong mark;
(5) The laser guidance system can be used as
surveying equipment with greater range of coverage
than traditional surveying equipment, and can guide as
many surveyors or receivers as needed.
4. Conclusion
The adaptation and implementation of the CLG
system to the micro-catchment WH mechanical unit
(“Vallerani”) increased the system efficiency by at
least three times and substantially reduced the cost of
implementation. The improved system, after full
evaluation, is recommended for large-scale
rehabilitation-of-rangeland development projects in the
Badia and similar dry rangelands worldwide.
Furthermore, testing and evaluation revealed that the
performance of the CLG system can, with the
cooperation of manufacturers, be further enhanced to
better suit contour ridging with minor changes to the
devices’ specifications.
Acknowledgments
This research was partly supported by the project
“Communal Management and Optimization of
Mechanized Micro-catchment Water Harvesting for
Combating Desertification in the East Mediterranean
Region” financed by the Swiss Development
Commission (SDC). The research was also supported
by the “Water Benchmarks of CWANA” project,
financed by the Arab Fund for Economic and Social
Development (AFESD), the International Fund for
Agricultural Development (IFAD), and the OPEC
Fund for International Development (OFED). The
authors would like to also thank the National Center for
Agricultural Research and Extension (NCARE) for the
support provided in the field operations.
References
[1] R.J. Al-Tabini, J.D. Libbin, H. Saub, D.W. Bailey, I.
Abuamoud, J.M. Hawkes, Tal Rimah range
rehabilitation-Recreating a valuable resource, Report No.
4 of Jordan Component of the Sustainable Development of
Dry Lands Project, New Mexico State Univ., Jordan, 2008,
p. 18.
[2] P. Antinori, V. Vallerani, Experiments with water
harvesting technology with new special ploughs, in: Water
Harvesting for Improved Agricultural Production:
Proceedings of the FAO Expert Consultation, Cairo
(Egypt), FAO, Rome, 1994, pp. 113-132.
[3] M. Malagnoux, Degraded arid land restoration for
afforestation and agro-silvo-pastoral production through
new water harvesting mechanized technology, in: C. Lee,
T. Schaaf (Eds.), The Future of Drylands UNESCO, Paris,
France, 2006, pp. 269-282.
[4] G. Somme, T. Oweis, A. Abdulal, A. Bruggeman, A. Ali,
Micro-catchment water harvesting for improved
vegetative cover in the Syrian Badia, On-farm Water
Husbandry Research Reports Series No. 3, ICARDA,
Aleppo, Syria, 2004, p. 168.
[5] D. Prinz, Water harvesting for afforestation in dry areas, in:
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on
Rainwater Catchment Systems, Mannheim, Germany,
Sept., 10-14, 2001, pp. 195-198.
[6] ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research
in the Dry Areas), Communal management and
Contour Laser Guiding for the Mechanized “Vallerani” Micro-catchment Water Harvesting Systems
1316
optimization of mechanized micro-catchment water
harvesting for combating desertification in the east
mediterranean region, Project Final Report, Aleppo, Syria,
2007, p. 214.
[7] A. Ali, A. Yazar, A. Abdul Aal, T. Oweis, P. Hayek,
Micro-catchment water harvesting potential of an arid
environment, Ag. W. Mgt. 98 (2010) 96-104.
[8] J.F. Rickman, Manual for laser land leveling, Technical
Bulletin Series 5, Rice–Wheat Consortium for the
Indo-Gangetic Plains, New Delhi, 2002, pp. 5-7.
[9] M.L. Jat, P. Chandna, R. Gupta, S.K. Sharma, M.A. Gill,
Laser land leveling: A precursor technology for resource
conservation, Technical Bulletin Series 7, Rice–Wheat
Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, New Delhi,
2006, pp. 15-17.
[10] W. Bowers, Machinery Management: Fundamentals of
Machine Operation, 3rd ed., Deere and Company, Moline,
IL, USA, 1987, pp. 10-11.