* This article is based on research conducted as part on the UNRISD Program on Gender and Social Policy in Developing Countries. A version of this paper will appear in Shahra Razavi and Shireen Hassim, eds., Gender and Social Policy in Developing Countries (2006). I would like to thank Beth Goldblatt and Francie Lund for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.
1. For an extensive discussion of these political processes, see Hassim (2002).
2. For a more extensive discussion of the women’s movement, see Hassim (2004).
3. The emphasis on the “primary caregiver” rather than the mother or even guardian was a small but important shift. As Sainsbury and others have shown, the basis of welfare entitlements is a crucial aspect of welfare states. Entitlements that privilege the head of household tend to undermine women’s independent access to benefits. On the other hand, emphasis on motherhood can equally narrow women’s access to benefits by imposing moral regulation on women. In the South African case, the emphasis on the primaiy caregiver recognizes the work of childcare regardless of who performs it-an important factor in a context in which care giving is the responsibility of aunts and grandparents. See Sainsbury (1996). See also Fraser and Gordon (1994).
4. Paradoxically, the Democratic Party, which in many respects can be seen as the party of business, has supported the introduction of BIG.