Content uploaded by Ehi Sheena Omoregie
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ehi Sheena Omoregie on Jan 22, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 7 (5): 710-716, 2008
ISSN 1680-5194
© Asian Network for Scientific Information, 2008
710
Glycemic Indices and Glycemic Load of Some Nigerian Foods
E.S. Omoregie and A.U. Osagie
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Benin, P.M.B. 1154, Benin City, Nigeria
Abstract: The concept of glycemic index (GI) lists food items by virtue of their influence on postprandial
glucose. Though the glycemic index of common food items has been determined, the GI of the popularly
processed and commonly consumed foods in Nigeria is not known. This study determined the GI of ten
processed Nigerian foods and revealed their similarity in the release of glucose on consumption. The food
items tested were made from yam tubers, cassava tubers and local cereals. These foods were served to
human volunteers in several processed forms which resulted in viscous pastes. The GI results are
presented and it is recommended that these processed foods should be discouraged in the regular dietary
plan of people with chronic diseases such as coronary heart diseases, diabetes and cancer.
Key words: Glycemic index, postprandial glucose, processed Nigerian foods, diabetes mellitus and pastes
Introduction
The concept of glycemic index (GI) was proposed by
Jenkins and colleagues to characterize the rate of
carbohydrate absorption after a meal (Jenkins et al.,
1981). GI is defined as the area under the glucose
response curve after consumption of 50g carbohydrate
from a test food divided by the area under the curve after
consumption of 50g carbohydrate from a control food,
either white bread or glucose. (Wolever et al., 1991).
Over the past three decades, the GI of over 800 foods
has been determined worldwide and more foods are
being tested on weekly basis. The latest update in 2005
has 1300 entries derived from published and
unpublished verified sources (Foster-Powell et al.,Materials and Methods
2002). However, only limited information is available on
African traditional foods. Many factors together, including
carbohydrate type, fiber, protein, fat, food form and
method of preparation, determine the GI of a particular
food (Bjorck et al., 1994, Welch et al., 1987, Wolever et
al., 1991). High GI foods elicit, calorie for calorie, higher
insulin levels and c-peptide excretion than low GI foods
(Haber et al., 1997; Jenkins et al., 1987; Wolever and
Bolognesi, 1996). The reductions in dietary GI may also
lower the risks for various conditions associated with
hyperinsulinemia, such as diabetes mellitus (Salmeron
et al., 1997) and cardiovascular disease.
There is need for more research into the GI of our locally
consumed foods in order to produce data that can
effectively enable use of GI along with other dietary
recommendations in the treatment, management and
prevention of diseases. There are many proven benefits
of using the GI in nutrition. These include: (i) decreased
risk of cardiovascular disease; (ii) better diabetes
management and (iii) more successful body weight
management. Inspired in part by a hope to learn to
predict better, the GI of variants of foods of known GI
value, several groups have studied associations
between GI and defined components in groups of foods
(Jenkins et al., 1981; Wolever, 1990; Hollenbeck and
Coulston, 1991; Nishimune et al., 1991). Apparently, GI
values reflect, mainly, how promptly and rapidly glucose
enters the blood after food ingestion. In Nigeria, the adult
population eats foods made from yam tubers (Dioscorea
spp.), plantain (Musa spp.), cassava (Manihot spp.) and
locally grown cereals. The dry powdered forms of these
plant storage organs are reconstituted in hot water to
form solid pastes which are swallowed with soup. The
effects of processing these food items into diet pastes
on the GI have not been determined.
Experimental design: Fifty healthy human beings were
offered in a single meal, one of the ten food samples.
Blood samples were collected before feeding and
during the 180 min after the meal. Blood glucose was
determined. The integrated areas under the
postprandial glucose response curves were calculated.
Subjects: Fifty subjects aged between 16 and 40 years
(23 male and 27 female) were selected from students
and staff of the University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.
They were clinically normal, non-smokers and non-
diabetic. The subjects were appraised verbally and they
gave their informed consent.
Preparation of experimental diets: The dry powdered
food samples were purchased from Edaiken Market in
Benin City, Nigeria. The food samples were powdered
maize, rice, millet, wheat, sorghum, yam and cassava.
These were each sieved to pass through a 100-mesh
filter and then reconstituted into solid pastes in hot water
by a trained cook to ensure consistency (Table 1). The
pastes obtained were as follows:
Omoregie and Osagie: Glycemic indices and glycemic load of some foods
711
Table 1: Processing and Preparation of the Diet Pastes (Okoh, 1998)
Agricultural Form Pre-Processing Paste Preparation
1. Cassava tuber (Manihot utilisima): Eba/Garri Tuber was homogenized in water. Dry powdered starch was
Cassava Starch The starch was allowed to settle, reconstituted in hot water with addi-
filtered out and dried at 28 C. tion of small quantity of palm oil.
o
2. Cassava tuber (Manihot utilisima): Tuber was grated and dried then Dry powder was added to boiling
fried in shallow heated pots. water to form a paste.
3. Yam tuber (Dioscorea rotundata): Fresh tuber was sliced into thin pieces. Dry powder was added to boiling water
Amala and sun-dried for 7 days. Dried slices and stirred until a solid paste was .
were milled to powder obtained
4. Maize (Zea mays): Agidi The dry grains were soaked in water Dry powder was added to boiling water
and fermented for about 3 days. and stirred until a semi-solid paste
The fermented grains were milled resulted. Paste hardened further on
and sieved to remove pericarp and cooling.
bran fractions. The starch fraction
was dried slowly.
5. Maize seeds (Zea mays): Clean, dry grains were moistened with Dry powder was added to boiling
Tuwo Masara water and milled. The hulls were rem- water and stirred until a solid paste
oved by aspiration while the endosperm resulted.
and germs were removed by passing
through a sieve leaving the maize grits.
6. Millet grains (Pennisetum The grain was pounded in a wooden Dry flour was added to boiling water
typhoides): Tuwo Gero mortar. The bran was winnowed off. and stirred until a solid paste resulted
The separated grain was then pounded
into flour.
7. Sorghum seeds (Sorghum The moist grain was pounded with a Dry flour was added to boiling water and
bicolor L. Moench): Tuwo Dawa wooden pestle in a mortar until most stirred until a solid paste was obtained.
of the pericarp was removed. The bran
fraction was removed by winnowing.
The dehulled grain was again pounded
to make flour.
8. Rice (Oryza sativa): Tuwo Shinkafa Polished rice was pounded and Dry flour was added to boiling water and
fltered through a sieve. stirred until a solid paste was obtained.
9. Wheat (Triticum aestivum): Semovita Wheat grains were cleaned, conditioned Flour was added to boiling water and stirred
and milled into flour. until thick and consistent paste cooked for
additional 1-2 minutes.
10. Wheat (Triticum aestivum): Semolina Wheat grains were cleaned, conditioned Flour was added to boiling water and stirred
and milled into flour. until thick and consistent paste was obtained.
Paste was cooked for additional 1-2 minutes.
1. Cassava: Starch Determination of blood glucose: All subjects for the
2. Cassava: Eba Garri
3. Yam: Amala
4. Maize: Agidi
5. Maize: Tuwo Masara
6. Millet: Tuwo Gero
7. Sorghum: Tuwo Dawa
8. Rice: Tuwo Shinkafa
9. Wheat: Semovita
10. Wheat: Semolina
Preliminary trials were carried out using local foods
prepared in a similar manner from plantain (elubo), yam
(pounded yam), cassava (lafun) and fermented cassava
(akpu). The processed pastes were analyzed for
proximate composition of moisture, ash, crude fat, crude
fibre and protein (AOAC, 1983). Carbohydrate was
determined by difference. 50g of available carbohydrate
for each test food sample was calculated from the
results of the proximate analysis and the measured
portion of the food was served to the subjects.
investigation fasted overnight. Their blood samples were
collected through finger prick using a hypodermic needle
or lancets. Each blood sample was placed on a test
strip which was inserted into a calibrated glucometer.
(Accu-Check/One touch) which gave direct readings after
45 seconds based on glucose oxidase assay method.
The determination of glucose level was done at intervals
i.e. 0 (fasting level), 30mins, 60mins, 120mins and
180mins.
Glycemic index calculation and statistics: Changes in
blood glucose concentration were calculated separately
for each post meal period by using the blood
concentration before meal (time 0) as a baseline.
Postprandial responses were compared for maximum
increase and incremental area under the glucose curves
for each food. The integrated area under the
postprandial glucose curve was calculated by the
trapezoidal method (Wolever et al., 1987). Area
increments under the curves for a given food were
determined for the 3 hour period after the meal. The
Omoregie and Osagie: Glycemic indices and glycemic load of some foods
712
Table 2: Proximate Analysis of Ten Processed Nigerian Foods (in Dry Weight Percent)
Food Moisture (g% Crude Crude Crude Carbohy-
Components Fresh Weight) Ash (g%) Protein (g%) Lipid (g%) Fibre (g%) drate (g%)
Starch (cassava) 75.10±0.10 1.06±0.06 2.46±0.62 1.55±0.35 2.25±1.75 92.68±0.05
Eba (cassava) 72.00±1.0 1.10±0.07 4.50±0.35 0.58±0.4 2.15±0.12 86.45±0.27
Amala (yam) 65.50±0.50 1.65±0.05 4.47±0.19 0.25±0.05 0.75±0.25 92.88±0.13
Agidi (maize) 84.80±0.24 2.90±0.10 6.82±0.27 0.35±0.05 1.75±1.2 88.18±0.12
Tuwo Masara (Maize) 74.50±0.5 1.63±0.01 9.94±1.91 0.65±0.25 1.7±0.25 86.03±0.03
Tuwo Gero (Millet) 65.00±0.05 1.58±0.01 9.51±0.23 0.45±0.05 1.03±0.03 87.43±0.06
Tuwo Dawa (Sorghum) 60.30±0.25 1.58±0.01 9.28±0.43 0.40±0.05 1.25±0.25 87.49±0.02
Tuwo Shinkafa (Rice) 73.50±1.50 1.65±0.03 9.23±0.43 0.90±0.20 1.0±0.50 87.22±0.12
Semovita (wheat) + 44.70±0.10 2.10±0.60 10.63±0.46 1.00±0.30 1.25±0.25 85.02±0.18
10% corn supplement
Semolina (wheat) 54.90±0.10 2.48±0.08 10.73±0.41 1.50±0.05 1.26±0.38 84.03±0.14
Values are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 3 determinations).
Table 3: Available Carbohydrate in Processed Foods (ServingTable 4: Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of the Processed
Size) Food
Serving Size Glycemic Glycemic
Samples (Processed) (g) Food Samples Index Load
Starch (Cassava) 162.15 Starch (Cassava) 98.60±2.68 49.30±3.5
Eba (Cassava) 206.50 Eba (Cassava) 82.25±0.05 41.13±3.3
Amala (Plantain) 156.25 Amala (Yam) 84.35±2.68 42.18±4.2
Agidi (Maize) 373.13 Agidi (Maize) 92.30±0.05 46.15±3.1
Tuwo Masara (Maize) 158.00 Tuwo Masara (Maize) 86.80±0.5 43.40±1.5
Tuwo Gero (Millet) 163.40 Tuwo Gero (Millet) 93.60±2.25 46.80±3.4
Tuwo Dawa (Sorghum) 144.00 Tuwo Dawa (Sorghum) 85.30±1.05 42.65±3.2
Tuwo Shinkafa (Rice) 160.90 Tuwo Shinkafa (Rice) 95.30±1.25 47.65±2.2
Semovita (Wheat) + 10% Corn supplement 106.70 Semovita (Wheat) + 95.80±0.28 47.90±2.5
Semolina (Wheat) 131.90 10% Corn supplement
relative glycemic index of each food was calculated as
percent of the mean of individual areas under the
glucose response curves. (Wolever et al., 1987) The
increase in glucose response area was analysed
statistically using one way ANOVA and Scheffe’s test
(Allison et al., 1995).
Results
The results of the proximate analysis of the test food
samples are shown in Table 2. The proximate analysis
on the processed food from wheat, sorghum, rice and
maize showed low lipid contents compared to the
analysis of the unprocessed seeds (Ekpenyong, 1973;
Okoh, 1998). The cereal flours had higher crude protein
content than the tuber flours. From previous studies yam
and cassava tubers were naturally low in fat (Osagie and
Opute, 1981; Bradbury and Holloway, 1988). Thus, all
the processed powders used in making the
experimental pastes can be regarded as having low fat
content. The two test samples made from cassava tuber
(starch) and (eba) differed significantly in crude protein
content. Semolina and semovita are wheat products and
their proximate composition was similar.
The serving size for each meal was calculated from the
carbohydrate content (Table 3). The glucose
concentration attained after consumption of the test
foods and glucose (reference food) are graphically
displayed in Fig. 1 - 10. The Glycemic Index and
Semolina (Wheat) 95.28 ± 0.04 47.64±1.5
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3 determinations)
Glycemic Load of the food samples were calculated
(Table 4). All the test samples are high Glycemic Index
foods. Cassava starch gave the highest GI value
followed by semovita. In two hours, these foods deliver
as much glucose as the free sugar (control) to the blood
system. In the absence of adequate insulin delivery,
these foods would certainly overwhelm the sugar
metabolic system. They are thus not considered suitable
or adequate meals for type II diabetics.
Discussion
Before plant foods are consumed by man, they are
generally processed. The processing methods include
cooking, (i.e. boiling, roasting, frying, steaming, baking,
autoclaving), drying, mashing, grinding into flour and
fermentation. In this study, the test foods were basically
dried, ground into flour, sieved and then reconstituted to
paste with hot water. Thus the particle sizes were
reduced, fine and the starch was retrograded
(gelatinized) to a variable extent. These treatments might
have led to their having high glycemic indices (Ludwig,
2003; Bjorck and Elmstahl, 2005). This is similar to
reports that increased processing and starch
retrogradation can affect GI (Foster-Powell et al., 2005).
Processing the seeds removes the fiber-rich outer bran
and the vitamin and mineral rich inner germ leaving
Omoregie and Osagie: Glycemic indices and glycemic load of some foods
713
Fig. 1: Graphical representation showing the glucoseFig. 4: Graphical representation showing the glucose
response area of test food A (Agidi) andresponse area of test food D (semovita) and
reference food (Glucose D). reference food (Glucose D).
Fig. 2: Graphical representation showing the glucoseFig. 5: Graphical representation showing the glucose
response area of test food B (Amala) andresponse area of test food E (Semolina) and
reference food (Glucose D). reference food (Glucose D).
Fig. 3: Graphical representation showing the glucoseFig. 6: Graphical representation showing the glucose
response area of test food C (Starch) andresponse area of test food F (Eba) and
reference food (Glucose D). reference food (Glucose D).
endosperm. This treatment caused reduction in particleincreasing the GI. Our study agrees with the finding in
size and faster gelatinization of starch, thereby Kenya where similarly processed maize flour
Omoregie and Osagie: Glycemic indices and glycemic load of some foods
714
Fig. 7: Graphical representation showing the glucoseFig. 9: Graphical representation showing the glucose
response area of test food G (Tuwo Rice) andresponse area of test food I (Tuwo maize) and
reference food (Glucose D). reference food (Glucose D).
Fig. 8: Graphical representation showing the glucoseFig. 10: Graphical representation showing the glucose
response area of test food H (Tuwo Millet) andresponse area of test food J (Tuwo rice) and
reference food (Glucose D). reference food (Glucose D).
and millet flour made into gruel had high GI (Foster-rise in blood sugar, with the result that one is lacking in
Powell et al., 2002). energy and hungry within a short time, thus the desire to
The test foods were swallowed without chewing.eat will arise. If this pattern is repeated, there is the
Chewing normally reduces the particle size of foods and likelihood of gaining weight as a result of constantly
facilitates mixture with salivary amylase, hence reducing eating. The overall effects are that the individual will gain
digestion time of carbohydrates. Despite the directweight i.e. obesity might result. It could trigger diabetes
swallowing of these test food pastes, they resulted in the in individuals that are prone to the disease, or worsen
same level of blood glucose as the reference sample,the management of the disease (Gilberston et al., 2001).
within two hours. This is in agreement with the fact thatType II diabetes which is associated with insulin
different food products with similar quality and type ofinsensitivity may also result in elevated blood sugar
carbohydrate form show different glycemic response. levels and increased insulin demand; thus
(Thorsdottir et al., 2005). Since these test foods wereoverburdening the ability of the pancreas to produce
reconstituted in hot water, the nature of starchinsulin. Reports by workers like Salmeron et al. (1997)
retrogradation or the production of resistant starch mayhave indicated a positive correlation between high GI
be similar. It is desirable that modern food processingand risk of type II diabetes. Again, the consumption of
techniques be modified so as to reduce preparationthe processed foods under reference in these studies
time while at the same time preserving slow digestionmight have serious health implications in such
properties. diseases like the heart diseases via insulin resistant
The health implications of the high GI of the processedsyndrome called metabolic syndrome X (Ludwig, 2003).
foods are that they could cause a fast and short - lived Additionally, high blood sugar levels have been
Omoregie and Osagie: Glycemic indices and glycemic load of some foods
715
associated with increased blood pressure, blood clotAOAC, 1983. Official Methods of Analysis, 13th Edn.
formation and reduced endothelial dependent blood flow
(Ludwig, 2003).
In recent years, the GI has been transformed by its
popularizers from a potentially useful tool in planning
diets for diabetic patients to a key player for the
prevention of diabetes, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular
disease and even certain cancers in the general
population. The debate concerns whether such a
transformation is justified. That is, whether it is wise and
reasonable to set as a public health policy for the entire
population the avoidance of certain foods because of
their high GI. To explore this question, one needs to
examine the supporting data, their quantity and quality,
their relation to causation and the possible presence of
confounders.
There are 2 theories about how high - GI foods increase
food intake. The first is that it is a result of the elevation
in glucose and the second, more commonly expressed
recently, is that it is the result of a high insulin response.
This high insulin response has been related to several
phenomena including increased food intake leading to
obesity (Roberts, 2000), hyperinsulinaemia leading to
insulin resistance (Frost et al., 1998), cell exhaustion
leading to type 2 diabetes (Salmeron et al., 1997),
dyslipidemia leading to coronary heart disease (CHD)
(Liu et al., 2001) and unknown factors leading to certain
kinds of cancers.
The foods tested in this study were selected to represent
the nutritional variability that adult Nigerians consume.
Many of them suffer from chronic diseases such as
coronary heart diseases, obesity and diabetes. Direct
relationship of these diseases to consumption of high
GI foods will require further enlarged and long-term
studies. There is also need for more research into the GI
of our locally consumed foods in order to produce data
that can effectively enable use of GI alongside other
dietary recommendations in the management and
prevention of diseases. In conclusion, this study could
assist food manufacturers and processors to develop a
greater range of low-GI processed foods from African
farm produce. The findings have obvious importance in
formulating rational dietary and therapeutic goals for
diabetic patients and others with clinical conditions
necessitating carbohydrate restriction.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to our students (Atomatofa, E.U., Ibeji,
1
C.U., Awe, K., Omoregie, M.O., Akpeh, P.K. and
Uwaomah, N.) for their assistance with the organization
of the studies.
References
Allison, D.B., F. Paltre and M.I. Goran, 1995. Statistical
considerations regarding the use of ratios to adjust
data. Int. J. Obesity, 19: 644-652. cardiovascular disease. JAMA, 287: 2414-2423.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Washington, DC., pp: 755-800.
Bjorck, I. and H. Elmstahl, 2005 . The glycemic index:
Importance of dietary fibre and other food
properties. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 62: 201-206.
Bjorck, I., Y. Granfeldt, H. Liljeberg, J. Tovar and N.G.
Asp, 1994. Food properties affecting the digestion
and absorption of Carbohydrates. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.,
59: 6995-7055.
Bradbury, J.H. and W.D. Holloway, 1988. The chemical
composition of tropical root crops. ASEAN Food J.,
4: 3-31.
Ekpenyong, T.E., 1973. Problems of maize quality
improvement. W. Afr. J. Biol. Appl. Chem., 16: 3-8.
Foster-Powell, K., S.H.A. Hoh and Brand-Miller, 2002.
International tables of glycemic index and glycemic
load: Am. J. Clin. Nutr,. 76: 5-56.
Frost, G., A. Leeds, G. Trew, R. Margara and A.
Dornhorst, 1998. Insulin sensitivity in women at risk
of coronary heart disease and the effect of a low
glycemic index diet. Metabolism, 47: 1245-1251.
Gilbertson, R., S. Evans, C. Brand-Miller, P. Chondros, A.
Thornburn and G. Werther, 2001. The effect of
flexible low glycemic index dietary advice versus
measured carbohydrates exchange diets on
glycemic control in children with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care, 24: 1137-1143.
Haber, G.B., K.W. Heaton, D. Murphy and L.F. Burroughs,
1979. Depletion and disruption of dietary fibre.
Effects on satiety, plasma-glucose and serum-
insulin. Lancet, 2: 679-682.
Hollenbeck, C.G. and A.M. Coulston, 1991. Effects of
dietary carbohydrate and fat intake on glucose and
lipoprotein metabolism in individuals with diabetes
mellitus. Diabetes Care, 14: 774-785.
Jenkins, D.J., T.M. Wolever, R.H. Taylor, H. Barker, H.
Fielden, J.M. Baldwin, A.C. Bowling, H.C. Newman,
A.L. Jenkins and D.V. Goff, 1981. Glycemic Index of
foods: A physiological basis for carbohydrate
exchange. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 34: 362-366.
Jenkins, D.J.A., M.J. Thorne, T.M.S. Wolever, A.L.
Jenkins, A.V. Rao and L.U. Thompson, 1987. The
effect of starch-protein interaction in wheat on the
glycemic response and rate of in vitro digestion. Am.
J. Clin. Nutr., 45: 946-951.
Liu, S., J. Manson and M.J. Stampfer, 2001. Dietary
glycemic load assessed by food-frequency
questionnaire in relation to plasma HDL-cholesterol
and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in
postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 73:
560-566.
Ludwig, D., 2003. Dietary glycemic index: Physiological
mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes and
Omoregie and Osagie: Glycemic indices and glycemic load of some foods
716
Nishimune, T., T. Yakuzhigi, T. Sumimoto, S. Taguchi, Y. Welch, I.M.L., C. Bruce, S.E. Hill and N.W. Read, 1987.
Konishi, S. Nakahara, T. Ichikawa and N. Kunita,Duodenal and ileal lipid suppresses blood glucose
1991. Glycemic response and fiber content of some and insulin responses in man: Possible
foods. Am., J. Clin. Nutr., 54: 414-419. complications for the dietary management of
Okoh, P.N., 1998. Cereal grains: In Nutritional Quality of diabetes mellitus. Clin. Sci., 72: 209-216.
Plant Foods (Eds.) A.U. Osagie and O.U. Eka, Post- Wolever, T.M.S. and C. Bolognesi, 1996. Source and
Harvest Research Unit, University of Benin, Benin
City, Ambik Press, pp: 32-52.
Osagie, A.U. and F.I. Opute, 1981. Total lipid and fatty
acid composition of tropical tubers. Nig. J. Nutr. Sci.,
2: 39-46.
Roberts, S.B., 2000. High-glycemic index of foods,
hunger and obesity: Is there a connection? Rev., 58:
163-9.
Salmeron, J., A. Ascherio and E. Rimm, 1997. Dietary
fiber, glycemic load and rise of NIDDM in men.
Diabetes Care, 47: 1244-1251.
Thorsdottir, I., B. Birgisdottir, L. Steingrimdottir, B.
Karistrom, I. Bjorck, A. Flint, O. Kolset, M. Uusittupa,
M. Schulze and D. Jenkins, 2005. Glycemic index:
From research to nutritional recommendations.
Ekpresson and Kopiceter, Denmark, pp: 1-84.
amount of carbohydrate affect postprandial glucose
and insulin on normal subjects. J. Nutr., 126: 2798-
2806.
Wolever, T.M.S., 1990. Relationship between dietary
fiber content and composition in foods and their
glycemic index. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 50: 72-75.
Wolever, T.M.S., D.J.A. Jenkins, A.L. Jenkins and R.G.
Josse, 1991. The glycemic index: Methodology and
Clinical implications. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 54: 846-854.
Wolever, T.M.S., D.J.A. Jenkins, R.G. Josse, G.S. Wong
and R. Lee, 1987. The glycemic index: Similarity of
values derived in insulin-dependent and non-
insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J. Am. Clin.
Nutr., 6: 295-305.