ArticlePDF Available

'White revolution' to 'white pollution' - Agricultural plastic film mulch in China

DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/091001
Authors:
Enke Liu at Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Enke Liu
W Q He
W Q He
Changrong Yan at Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Changrong Yan
Download full-text PDFDownload full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract and Figures

Plastic film mulching has played an important role in Chinese agriculture due to its soil warming and moisture conservation effects. With the help of plastic film mulch technology, grain and cash crop yields have increased by 20–35% and 20–60%, respectively. The area of plastic film coverage in China reached approximately 20 million hectares, and the amount of plastic film used reached 1.25 million tons in 2011. While producing huge benefits, plastic film mulch technology has also brought on a series of pollution hazards. Large amounts of residual plastic film have detrimental effects on soil structure, water and nutrient transport and crop growth, thereby disrupting the agricultural environment and reducing crop production. To control pollution, the Chinese government urgently needs to elevate plastic film standards. Meanwhile, research and development of biodegradable mulch film and multi-functional mulch recovery machinery will help promote effective control and management of residual mulch pollution.
Figures - uploaded by Changrong Yan
Author content
All figure content in this area was uploaded by Changrong Yan
Content may be subject to copyright.
56656d0308ae418a78
6eeac3.pdf
Content uploaded by Changrong Yan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Changrong Yan on Dec 07, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
'White revolution' to 'white pollution' - Agricultural plastic film mulch in
China.pdf
Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
Download details:
IP Address: 220.143.113.226
This content was downloaded on 24/09/2015 at 18:43
Please note that terms and conditions apply.
‘White revolution’ to ‘white pollution’—agricultural plastic film mulch in China
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more
2014 Environ. Res. Lett. 9 091001
(http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/9/9/091001)
Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience
Perspective
‘White revolution’to ‘white pollution’—
agricultural plastic film mulch in China
E K Liu
1,2,3
,WQHe
1,2,3
and C R Yan
1,2
1
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural
Sciences, Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
2
Key Laboratory of Dryland Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China
(MOA), Beijing 100081, People’s Republic of China
E-mail: yancr@ieda.org.cn
Received 4 July 2014, revised 31 July 2014
Accepted for publication 1 August 2014
Published 9 September 2014
Abstract
Plastic film mulching has played an important role in Chinese agriculture due to its soil warming
and moisture conservation effects. With the help of plastic film mulch technology, grain and cash
crop yields have increased by 20–35% and 20–60%, respectively. The area of plastic film
coverage in China reached approximately 20 million hectares, and the amount of plastic film
used reached 1.25 million tons in 2011. While producing huge benefits, plastic film mulch
technology has also brought on a series of pollution hazards. Large amounts of residual plastic
film have detrimental effects on soil structure, water and nutrient transport and crop growth,
thereby disrupting the agricultural environment and reducing crop production. To control
pollution, the Chinese government urgently needs to elevate plastic film standards. Meanwhile,
research and development of biodegradable mulch film and multi-functional mulch recovery
machinery will help promote effective control and management of residual mulch pollution.
Keywords: agricultural plastic film, white pollution, control pollution
In the past 30 years, advancement in agricultural science and
technology has caused great changes in agricultural produc-
tion in China [1]. Plastic film mulching technology has
remarkably improved grain crop yield and water use effi-
ciency through conserving water, maintaining soil moisture,
suppressing weeds, increasing temperature and improving
cold tolerance. Nationwide, the technology has led to a
20–35% increase in grain crop yield and a 20–60% increase in
cash crop yield. Maize, wheat, cotton and potato yields have
increased by 33.7%, 33.2%, 26.1% and 36.7%, respectively,
while their corresponding water use efficiency levels have
increased by 38.9%, 30.2%, 30.2% and 37.8%, respectively
[2]. At present, transformation of Chinese agriculture aims to
establish an intensive, standardized, mechanized, indus-
trialized and specialized modern agriculture system. In this
regard, plastic film mulching technology plays a crucial role
in enhancing regional agricultural production, ensuring food
security and increasing income of farmers.
According to China Agricultural Statistical Yearbook [3],
the volume of plastic film mulch used in China increased
nearly four-fold from 319 000 tons to 1 245 000 tons from
1991 to 2011. Its annual growth rate is 7.1% and is expected
to increase in the coming years. Accordingly, the total crop
area covered with plastic film mulch similarly exhibited a
sustained rate of growth, increasing from 117 000 hm
2
in
1982 to 4 909 000 hm
2
in 1991 to 19 791 000 hm
2
in 2011.
Data from 1991, 2001 and 2011 were analyzed, and the
distribution of plastic film mulch use intensity in China was
calculated as follows: plastic film mulch use intensity =
amount of plastic film mulch usage/regional arable land area.
Over the past 20 years, all of the provinces and regions of
China have shown increasing trends in plastic film mulch use
Environmental Research Letters
Environ. Res. Lett. 9(2014) 091001 (3pp) doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/091001
3
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further
distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the
title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
1748-9326/14/091001+03$33.00 © 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd1
intensity, with increase ranging from three- to ten-fold. The
Northern regions exhibited greater growth, with higher
absolute intensity. For example, the plastic film mulch use
intensity in Xinjiang increased from 7.0 kg hm
−2
in 1991 to
34.8 kg hm
−2
in 2011(1 kg plastic film can cover 150–250 m
2
area). Over the next ten years, the cultivation area covered by
plastic film mulch is expected to increase at a rate of 8–10%,
with the covered crop area increasing from the current 20
million hm
2
to above 30 million hm
2
and plastic film mulch
usage increasing from the current 1.2 million tons to above
two million tons.
Despite benefits of plastic film mulch technology, how-
ever, its widespread use has generated large amounts of
mulch residue. As a result, the application of plastic film
mulch technology is evolving from ‘white revolution’to
‘white pollution’(figure 1). Since plastic film mulch is mainly
composed of polyvinyl chloride, the residual mulch film does
not readily degrade in soil. The problem is worsened by the
low rate of plastic film mulch recovery due to mechanized
cultivation and thin film (less than 0.008 mm). Investigation
of the major plastic film mulch use areas in China indicated
soil residual mulch levels of 50–260 kg hm
−2
in arable lands
with long-term plastic film mulch cover (over ten years) [2].
Large amounts of residual mulch film can lead to unsustain-
able farmland use and thereby affect the agricultural envir-
onment [2,4]. The main considerations are as follows. (1)
Effect on moisture and nutrient transport in soil. These
changes primarily reflect the damage to the physical structure
of soil by residual mulch, which blocks the infiltration of
capillary water and natural water and affects the moisture
absorption in soil. As a result, nutrient movement speed and
moisture penetration are reduced. (2) Effect on crop emer-
gence and root growth. Studies in Xinjiang showed that
residual plastic film mulch levels of 200 kg hm
−2
in the top-
soil (0–20 cm) affected the emergence rate of cotton seeds and
reduced cotton production by 15%. (3) Secondary salinization
of soil. Studies showed that mulching for 5–20 consecutive
years led to a 122–146% increase in the salt content of the
topsoil. (4) Degradation of polyethylene residual mulch film
is negligible with the possible formation of environmentally
harmful chemical products such as phthalate esters [5], di-(2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate, aldehydes and ketones.
Scientists in China have recognized the hazards from
plastic film mulch pollution and taken measures to address the
problem of residual plastic film mulch. However, due to
technical and economic limitations, it remains difficult to
apply these measures at a large-scale. Residual plastic film
mulch pollution has become a serious issue and needs to be
addressed from aspects of policy, regulation and technology
in an all-round manner. (1) Improve mulch film standards and
the relevant quality control mechanisms to increase mulch
film recovery and enhance mulch film recycling [5]. The
mulch film currently used in China is less than 0.008 mm
thick; in contrast, the mulch film used in the US and European
countries are generally 0.020 mm and in Japan 0.015 mm. In
these countries, the better quality mulch film remains mostly
intact after use, and nearly no residual plastic film mulch is
left in farmland soil after mechanized recovery. (2) Accelerate
development of biodegradable mulch film with reduced pro-
duction cost to replace the mulch film most commonly used at
Figure 1. Plastic film mulching field in Tongchuang, Shaanxi and plastic mulch residue field in Shihezi, Xijiang, China.
2
Environ. Res. Lett. 9(2014) 091001 E K Liu et al
present [6], which is primarily composed of polyvinyl
chloride. (3) Accelerate research and development of light-
weight, simple and multi-functional machinery for residual
mulch film recovery. The key focus should be farm machin-
ery and technical measures that can be used for both regular
farming operations (such as plowing) and residual mulch film
recovery. Thus, highly efficient mulch film recovery should
be achieved without increasing operation cost and burden on
farmers.
Plastic film mulching technology provides good water
retention and warming effects. If residual mulch film pollu-
tion can be effectively controlled in China, the application of
plastic film mulching technology in this country will provide
a useful reference for improving crop yield and water use
efficiency in other similar regions worldwide, particularly in
regions with cold and arid climates.
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor B H So for useful comments. Partial
support came from National Natural Science Foundation of
China (31370522), 12
th
five-year plan of National Key
Technologies R&D Program (No. 2012BAD09B01) and
‘948’project from Ministry of Agriculture (2014-Z6).
References
[1] Zhang F S, Chen X P and Vitousek P 2013 Chinese agriculture:
an experiment for the world Nature 497 33–5
[2] Yan C R, He W Q and Mei X R 2010 Agricultural Application
of Plastic Film and its Residue Pollution Prevention
(Beijing, China: Science Press)
[3] National Bureau of Statistics of China China Statistical
Yearbook (Beijing, China: China Statistics Press) from 1982
to 2012
[4] Chang R P and Yan C Y 2012 Research Report on Overall
Current Situation on Agricultural Plastics Residuals
Pollution and its Countermeasures (Beijing, China: China
Agricultural Science and Technology Press)
[5] Chen Y, Wu C, Zhang H, Lin Q, Hong Y and Luo Y 2013
Empirical estimation of pollution load and contamination
levels of phthalate esters in agricultural soils from plastic
film mulching in China Environ. Earth Sci. 70 239–47
[6] Kyrikou I and Briassoulis D 2007 Biodegradation of agricultural
plastic films: a critical review J. Polym. Environ. 15 125–50
3
Environ. Res. Lett. 9(2014) 091001 E K Liu et al
... 33 It has therefore become an important practice to promote agricultural production and improve livelihoods in many counties of the world and is wildly encouraged by agricultural extension agencies. 24,33,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] Over 80% of agricultural plastic mulch lms are made of PE, including high and low--density polyethylene (HDPE and LDPE). 16,28,75 In 2011, approximately 20 million hectares of Chinese farmland were covered in plastic mulch, with the use of 1.25 million tonnes of plastic mulch that year. ...
... 16,28,75 In 2011, approximately 20 million hectares of Chinese farmland were covered in plastic mulch, with the use of 1.25 million tonnes of plastic mulch that year. 72 In recent years, the global usage of plastic mulch has been rapidly increasing, with 1.5 million tonnes used in China in 2015. 24 Liu et al. 76 and Zhu et al. 24 have reported that plastic lms are usually thin, about 8-50 mm and 10-30 mm thick, respectively, which makes their removal from the eld aer cropping seasons very difficult and makes recycling less feasible. ...
Plastic particles in soil: State of the knowledge on sources, occurrence and distribution, analytical methods and ecological impacts
Article
  • Jan 2021
Increased production and use of plastics has resulted in growth in the amount of plastic debris accumulating in the environment, potentially fragmenting into smaller pieces. Fragments <5 mm are typically defined as microplastics, while fragments <0.1 µm are defined as nanoplastics. Over the past decade, an increasing number of studies have reported the occurrence and potential hazards of plastic particles in the aquatic environment. However, less is understood about plastic particles in the terrestrial environment and specifically how much plastic accumulates in soils, possible sources, potential ecological impacts, interaction of plastic particles with the soil environment, and appropriate extraction and analytical techniques for assessing the above. In this review, a comprehensive overview and a critical perspective on the current state of knowledge on plastic pollution in the soil environment is provided: detailing known sources, occurrence and distribution, analytical techniques used for identification and quantification and the ecological impacts of particles on soil. In addition, knowledge gaps are identified along with suggestions for future research.
... Plastic film mulches are routinely used in China to promote food security, with an annual use of nearly 1.5 million tons, covering a total land area of 18.4 million ha [1]. These films increase crop yields by promoting water and nutrient use efficiency as well as reducing soil erosion and disease incidence, allowing the more efficient use of pesticides [2,3]. ...
... Due to the persistence of plastic film residues in soil and their progressive accumulation (i.e. "white pollution"), their long-term use is not viewed as sustainable [1]. In addition, there are increasing concerns about the potential negative effects of microplastic residues in soil due to their potential to adversely affect soil health and enter the human and marine food chain [4][5][6]. ...
Field test on the biodegradation of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) based mulch films in soil
Article
Full-text available
The use of plastic much films has been fundamental to promoting food production in many regions of the world. However, concern is growing about the progressive accumulation of plastic residues in soil after crop harvest and its subsequent impact on soil health and potential to enter the food chain. Although biodegradable films have been developed to prevent these problems, it is still unclear whether they are environmentally benign. Here we evaluated the physical and chemical breakdown of four commercial poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) based biodegradable mulch films (BMF1, BMF2, BMF3 and BMF4) in an agricultural soil over a 26-month period. Based on visual examination, degradation followed the series BMF4 > BMF1, BMF2 > BMF3. Importantly, microplastic residues (fragments <5 mm) still remained in the soil of all 4 plastic types after 2 years, suggesting that they are likely to accumulate over time if used on an annual basis. Viscosimetry, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) were used to characterise the breakdown process. Our results indicated that the degradation of the mulch film after burial in agricultural soil may be linked to the nature of the polymer but also to its manufacturing formulation. Although the peak changes of polyester in the infrared spectrum were not distinct, the plastic films showed other signs of degradation including a reduction in intrinsic viscosity after burial in soil. The different degradation rates of BMF1 and BMF2 at the molecular level may be due to the different CaCO3 contents. In conclusion, under field conditions, we show that slight variations in the formulations of commercial biodegradable mulch films leads to very different persistence rates in soil. Further, we conclude that their slow rate of degradation will ultimately lead to their progressive accumulation in soil if used repeatedly.
... In addition, residues from agricultural plastic mulch films can accumulate in soils, particularly if the plastic films cannot be completely removed after harvest. Soils in China have been reported to contain as much as 72-260 kg ha −1 of plastic film residues (Liu, He, & Yan, 2014). Soils are therefore a major receptacle and reservoir of disposed plastics. ...
Current understanding of subsurface transport of micro‐ and nanoplastics in soil
Article
Full-text available
... As a crop cultivation practice, mulching has been shown to significantly increase the yields of various crops and yield components: strawberry [27]; peach [28]; oilseed rape [23]; maize [29]; spring and autumn potato [30,31]; wheat [32]. Most studies of the mulching film on maize in China used transparent plastic film [33]. Khan and Parvej, [34] showed that by a field trial which was conducted on the four indigenous mulches viz. ...
Natural Mulches Effect on the Yield of White Maize
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2020
The experiment was conducted at the experimental field of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University during the period from November 2015 to May 2016, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka-1207, to find out the effect of organic mulches on the yield of white maize. This experiment was comprised of two factors. Factor A: Variety (2): V1 = Shuvra; V2 = KS-510 and Factor B: Indigenous mulch materials (5): T1 = Control (without mulch); T2 = Water hyacinth; T3 = Rice straw; T4 = Rice husk; T5 = Ash. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications and the differences between means were separated by both Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DMRT) and Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at 5% level of probability. Mulches showed significant effects on most of the parameters. In the case of variety, the highest grain yield (12.963ton per ha) was recorded from V2. Different organic mulch materials showed different values, the highest values were recorded from T3. Due to this (T3) mulch material. The water retentive capacity of the mulched soil was higher at all the stages of plant growth and ranked in the order of rice straw > water hyacinth > rice husk > ash > control. The highest grain yield (17.407ton per ha) was recorded from T3. . In the case of interaction all yield attributing characters include grain yield (19.043ton per ha) was recorded from V2T3. So, KS-510 variety and rice straw mulch combinedly had outstanding superiority for morphophysiological and yield attributes in white maize over the other organic mulches.
... Microplastics in the soil can destroy the soil structure, reduce infiltration of rainwater and irrigation water, and negatively impact the water holding capacity of the soil (Liu et al., 2014). Microplastics can also affect the diversity of the soil microbial community, thereby affecting the physical and chemical properties of the soil (Bandopadhyay et al., 2018). ...
Effect of microplastics and arsenic on nutrients and microorganisms in rice rhizosphere soil
Article
Full-text available
The presence of microplastics and arsenic in soil can endanger crop growth; therefore, their effects on the properties of rhizosphere soil should be evaluated. Large (10–100 µm) and small (0.1–1 µm) polystyrene (PSMP) and polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) particles were added to soil with different arsenic concentrations (1.4, 24.7, and 86.3 mg kg⁻¹) to investigate the combined effect of microplastics and arsenic pollution on rice rhizosphere soil. After the addition of PSMP and PTFE, pH, arsenic (V) and arsenic (III) in the soil were observed to decrease. The interaction of arsenic with PSMP and PTFE resulted in this phenomenon, leading to a decrease of arsenic bioavailability in the soil. PSMP, PTFE, and arsenic reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria, increased the abundance of Chloroflexi and Acidobacteria, and inhibited soil urease, acid phosphatase, protease, dehydrogenase, and peroxidase activity via affecting the tertiary structure of the enzyme. PSMP, PTFE, and arsenic also reduced the available nitrogen and phosphorus content in the soil. Arsenic increased the soil organic matter content, whereas PSMP and PTFE reduced the organic matter content. Furthermore, microplastics inhibited the effects of arsenic on the microbial and chemical properties of the rhizosphere soil. This study revealed the effects of microplastic and arsenic pollution on rice rhizosphere microorganisms and nutrients, and elucidated the mechanism by which these pollutants retard crop growth in the designed growth medium.
... Agricultural mulch film is widely used to cover cultivated fields, where it promotes higher soil temperatures [1], better soil moisture conservation [2], effective weed suppression [3], and increased crop yields [4]. Its excellent physical and mechanical properties and affordable price make plastic mulch film the most indispensable and highly consumed product [5,6], with an estimated 1.25−1.4 million tons of film applied annually in China [7,8]. Most plastic mulch film in China is made primarily of polyethylene (PE) with superior properties such as high molecular weight (>30 kDa), 3D structure, and hydrophobicity, but these properties make PE highly resistant to degradation [9]. ...
Greater Biofilm Formation and Increased Biodegradation of Polyethylene Film by a Microbial Consortium of Arthrobacter sp. and Streptomyces sp
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2020
The widespread use of polyethylene (PE) mulch films has led to a significant accumulation of plastic waste in agricultural soils. The biodegradation of plastic waste by microorganisms promises to provide a cost-effective and environmentally-friendly alternative for mitigating soil plastic pollution. A large number of microorganisms capable of degrading PE have been reported, but degradation may be further enhanced by the cooperative activity of multiple microbial species. Here, two novel strains of Arthrobacter sp. and Streptomyces sp. were isolated from agricultural soils and shown to grow with PE film as a sole carbon source. Arthrobacter sp. mainly grew in the suspension phase of the culture, and Streptomyces sp. formed substantial biofilms on the surface of the PE film, indicating that these strains were of different metabolic types and occupied different microenvironments with contrasting nutritional access. Individual strains were able to degrade the PE film to some extent in a 90-day inoculation experiment, as indicated by decreased hydrophobicity, increased carbonyl index and CO 2 evolution, and the formation of biofilms on the film surface. However, a consortium of both strains had a much greater effect on these degradation properties. Together, these results provide new insights into the mechanisms of PE biodegradation by a microbial consortium composed of different types of microbes with possible metabolic complementarities.
The Influence of Mulching on the Physical Properties of Agricultural Environment
Article
  • Jan 2021
Effects of plastic particles on germination and growth of soybean (Glycine max): A pot experiment under field condition
Article
Full-text available
Plastic residues have become a serious environmental problem in areas where agricultural plastic film are used intensively. Although numerous of studies have been done to assess its impacts on soil quality and crop yields, the understanding of meso-plastic particles effects on plant is still limited. In this study, low density polyethylene (PE) and biodegradable plastic (Bio) mulch film were selected to study the effects of meso-plastic debris on soybean germination and plant growth with the accumulation levels of 0%, 0.1%, 0.5% and 1% in soil (w: w, size ranging 0.5-2 cm) by a pot experiment under field condition. Results showed that the germination viability of soybean seeds was reduced to 82.39%, 39.44% and 26.06% in the treatments with 0.1%, 0.5% and 1% added plastic debris compared to the control (CK), respectively, suggesting that plastic residues in soil inhibit the viability of soybean seed germination. The plastic debris had a significant negative effect on plant height and culm diameter during the entire growth stage of soybean. Similarly, the leaf area at harvest was reduced by 1.97%, 6.86% and 11.53% compared to the CK in the treatments with 0.1%, 0.5% and 1% plastic debris addition, respectively. In addition, the total plant biomass under plastic addition was reduced in both the flowering and harvesting stages, compared to the CK. For the different type of plastic residues, plant height, leaf area and root/shoot ratio at group PE were significantly lower than those of groups treated by Bio. In conclusion, PE debris had a greater negative effects on plant height, culm diameter, leaf area and root/shoot ratio while Bio debris mainly showed the adverse effects on germination viability and root biomass especially at the flowering stage. Therefore, further research is required to elaborate plastic particles’ effects on different stages of crops and soil quality.
Biodegradable plastic mulch films in agriculture: feasibility and challenges
Article
The Occurrence and Transport of Microplastics: The State of the Science
Article
Microplastic (MP) particles have been observed in most environments and concentrations are expected to increase over the coming decades given continued and increased production of synthetic polymer products. The expected increase in plastic pollution (including MPs) may elevate the risk posed by these synthetic particles to both environmental and human health. The purpose of this review is to provide a review of the state of knowledge regarding the occurrence and transport of MPs in and across three of the Earths subsystems, specifically, the lithosphere, atmosphere, and hydrosphere. Evidence is presented that shows the lithosphere includes substantial MP accumulation (e.g. approximately 25 particles L-1 in landfill leachate), the impacts of which remain poorly understood. The atmosphere plays an important role in MP transport, with increased occurrence and higher transport concentrations noted in more densely populated areas (e.g. 175 to 313 particles m−2 d−1 in Dongguan China). In the hydrosphere, freshwater ecosystems alternate between MP transport (e.g. rivers) and deposition (e.g. lakes) with flow rate being identified as a key factor determining the movement and fate of MPs. Conversely, marine ecosystems act as a major sink for MP pollution (e.g. MP comprise 94%, approximately 1.69 trillion pieces, of plastic pieces in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch), driven by direct deposition or by transport via the atmosphere or freshwater conveyance systems (e.g. streams, rivers, or ice sheets). Once ingested by organisms, the trophic transfer and bioaccumulation of MPs has been confirmed with the polymer particles potentially accumulating in or impacting fauna, flora, microbes, and humans. Finally, 16 areas are identified in which future MP research efforts should be focused, with the goal of accurately identifying the scope and potential risks posed by synthetic polymer pollution. This review serves as a valuable steppingstone for future research and researchers wishing to address MP research gaps across various environmental settings in the coming decades.
Biodegradation of Agricultural Plastic Films: A Critical Review
Article
Full-text available
The growing use of plastics in agriculture has enabled farmers to increase their crop production. One major drawback of most polymers used in agriculture is the problem with their disposal, following their useful life-time. Non-degradable polymers, being resistive to degradation (depending on the polymer, additives, conditions etc) tend to accumulate as plastic waste, creating a serious problem of plastic waste management. In cases such plastic waste ends-up in landfills or it is buried in soil, questions are raised about their possible effects on the environment, whether they biodegrade at all, and if they do, what is the rate of (bio?)degradation and what effect the products of (bio?)degradation have on the environment, including the effects of the additives used. Possible degradation of agricultural plastic waste should not result in contamination of the soil and pollution of the environment (including aesthetic pollution or problems with the agricultural products safety). Ideally, a degradable polymer should be fully biodegradable leaving no harmful substances in the environment. Most experts and acceptable standards define a fully biodegradable polymer as a polymer that is completely converted by microorganisms to carbon dioxide, water, mineral and biomass, with no negative environmental impact or ecotoxicity. However, part of the ongoing debate concerns the question of what is an acceptable period of time for the biodegradation to occur and how this is measured. Many polymers that are claimed to be ‘biodegradable’ are in fact ‘bioerodable’, ‘hydrobiodegradable’, ‘photodegradable’, controlled degradable or just partially biodegradable. This review paper attempts to delineate the definition of degradability of polymers used in agriculture. Emphasis is placed on the controversial issues regarding biodegradability of some of these polymers.
Empirical estimation of pollution load and contamination levels of phthalate esters in agricultural soils from plastic film mulching in China
Article
Pollution load and contamination levels of phthalate esters (PAEs) in agricultural soils throughout China were studied in this work. The usage amount and residual rates of plastic film were the main factors explaining the variation among regions and leading to higher pollution load and contamination levels in agricultural big provinces. However, higher pollution loads and contamination levels frequently occurred under non-recycling than recycling scenarios during calculation. Extremely high loads (more than 10 kg/ha/year) of PAEs were estimated in five areas including Beijing city, Tibet, Liaoning Province, Jilin Province and Fujian Province and the high contamination levels in agricultural soil were presented in these places with more than 4.0 mg/kg under non-recycling scenarios. The predicted concentrations of PAEs in soils exceed the target value for soils from Netherlands (ΣPAEs = 0.1 mg/kg), indicating very high contamination of most Chinese agricultural soils. Significant differences in estimation results after plastic film utilization suggest that decreasing plastic film residue after application is an effective measure to control PAE pollution in soils. However, the comparison between contamination levels of PAEs estimated by the model and the previous detections of PAEs pollution levels in agricultural soils showed that there were presented wide range of PAE sources indicated to agricultural soils.
Chinese agriculture: An experiment for the world
Article
China's scientists are using a variety of approaches to boost crop yields and limit environmental damage, say Fusuo Zhang, Xinping Chen and Peter Vitousek.
Agricultural Application of Plastic Film and its Residue Pollution Prevention
  • Jan 2010
  • C R Yan
  • W He
  • X R Mei
Yan C R, He W Q and Mei X R 2010 Agricultural Application of Plastic Film and its Residue Pollution Prevention (Beijing, China: Science Press)
  • Jan 2012
  • R P Chang
Chang R P and Yan C Y 2012 Research Report on Overall Current Situation on Agricultural Plastics Residuals Pollution and its Countermeasures (Beijing, China: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press)