ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Adverse Events of Massage Therapy in Pain-Related Conditions: A Systematic Review

Authors:
  • Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (SWISS TCM UNI)

Abstract and Figures

Pain-related massage, important in traditional Eastern medicine, is increasingly used in the Western world. So the widening acceptance demands continual safety assessment. This review is an evaluation of the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) reported mainly for pain-related massage between 2003 and 2013. Relevant all-languages reports in 6 databases were identified and assessed by two coauthors. During the 11-year period, 40 reports of 138 AEs were associated with massage. Author, year of publication, country of occurrence, participant related (age, sex) or number of patients affected, the details of manual therapy, and clinician type were extracted. Disc herniation, soft tissue trauma, neurologic compromise, spinal cord injury, dissection of the vertebral arteries, and others were the main complications of massage. Spinal manipulation in massage has repeatedly been associated with serious AEs especially. Clearly, massage therapies are not totally devoid of risks. But the incidence of such events is low.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Review Article
Adverse Events of Massage Therapy in Pain-Related
Conditions: A Systematic Review
Ping Yin,1Ningyang Gao,2Junyi Wu,1Gerhard Litscher,3and Shifen Xu1
1Acupuncture Department, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200071, China
2Traumatology Department, Shuguang Hospital Aliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,
Shanghai 201203, China
3Research Unit for Complementary and Integrative Laser Medicine, Research Unit of Biomedical Engineering in
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, and TCM Research Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
Correspondence should be addressed to Shifen Xu; xu teacher@.com
Received July ; Accepted  July ; Published  August 
Academic Editor: Huang-Ping Yu
Copyright ©  Ping Yin et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Pain-related massage, important in traditional Eastern medicine, is increasingly used in the Western world. So the widening
acceptance demands continual safety assessment. is review is an evaluation of the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs)
reported mainly for pain-related massage between  and . Relevant all-languages reports in databases were identied
and assessed by two coauthors. During the -year period,  reports of  AEs were associated with massage. Author, year of
publication, country of occurrence, participant related (age, sex) or number of patients aected, the details of manual therapy,
and clinician type were extracted. Disc herniation, so tissue trauma, neurologic compromise, spinal cord injury, dissection of
the vertebral arteries, and others were the main complications of massage. Spinal manipulation in massage has repeatedly been
associated with serious AEs especially. Clearly, massage therapies are not totally devoid of risks. But the incidence of such events is
low.
1. Introduction
Massage, as any systematic form of touch or manipulation
performed on the so tissues of the body to provide com-
fort and promote health [], has become popular in the
United States and the rest of the world in recent decades.
It has also been recommended by the Chartered Society of
Physiotherapy for the management of various pain-related
conditions, especially those of musculoskeletal origin [],
such as neck pain, low back pain, headache, and migraine
[]. is is supported by numerous systematic reviews of
a large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [
]. Between  and , the -year prevalence of use of
massage by the US adult population increased from 5%(.
million) to 8.3% (. million), and massage belongs to one
of the most popular complementary and alternative medicine
(CAM) therapies in the USA []. e increased use brings
attention to the safety and quality of the modality.
Anumberoflargesurveysonthesafetyofmassagehave
been conducted. Most reported incidents have been fairly
minor, and incidence rates were low. For example, from
surveys and review articles, the risk of a serious irreversible
complication (e.g., stroke) for cervical manipulations has
been reported to vary from one adverse event in  to
one in ,, manipulations, and another review of the
articles on complications of spinal manipulation, which iden-
tied  complications, yielded estimates of vertebrobasilar
accidents from one in   patients to one per ,,
cervical manipulations and cauda equina syndrome to be less
than one per ,, treatments []. e authors of
these studies concluded that serious AEs seem to be rare and
massage is generally a safe intervention. So this systematic
review seeks to evaluate all published data (between  and
) about adverse eects of massage therapy. We specically
hope to help the clinician feel comfortable and informed in
conversations with their patients regarding the appropriate,
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014, Article ID 480956, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/480956
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
2246 reports in English
identified through database
searching
1036 reports in Chinese
identified through database
searching
3282 reports screened
3156 reports excluded: irrelevant
studies and duplicates
126 reports (full text
assessed for eligibility)
86 full texts excluded: unrelated to
AEs, no details reported
40 reports (138 cases)
included
F : Flow chart of the screening process.
safe, and eective use of massage, not only in pain-related
conditions.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Search Strategy. We searched databases in an attempt
to locate all existing case reports (irrespective of language of
publication) with original data on AEs following any type
of massage therapy published between January  and
June  in electronic form. PubMed including MEDLINE,
EMBASE, e Cochrane Library (via Wiley), CNKI, CQVIP,
and Wanfang digital databases were searched. Search terms
were “massage, manual therapy, tuina, and chiropractic.
ese terms were combined with “safe, safety, adverse event,
adverse reaction, side eects, complications, and risk.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Only original case
reports of complications or AEs of massage, manual therapy,
and tuina published from January  to June  were
included in this review. All those clinical study designs
shouldbepublishedinpeer-reviewedjournals,andlike
conference proceedings, cross-sectional and other descriptive
designs and narrative reviews were excluded. Two coauthors
independently screened the titles and abstracts of all papers
found from the initial search. Disagreements between the two
authors were resolved through discussion.
We excluded multiple inclusions and analyses of the same
AEs as well as irrelevant studies. An irrelevant study was
dened as a non-case report, such as a review, commentary,
or clinical trial. Treatments not typically carried out by a mas-
sage therapist were also excluded, such as cardiac massage,
prostatic massage, or carotid sinus massage. Adverse events
related to massage oils, for example, allergies to aromatherapy
oils or to the use of ice in conjunction with massage, were also
excluded. All articles were evaluated and validated by one of
the authors according to inclusion criteria.
2.3. Data Extraction. Electronic database searches identied
a total of  articles for consideration. Aer screening, 
potentially relevant articles were identied for full review,
and  studies met inclusion criteria nally. ere were 
articles that were excluded for being unrelated to AEs or for
having no details reported (Figure ).Afulllistofexcluded
articles is available from the corresponding author. When
provided, we extracted author, year of publication, country
of occurrence, participant related information (age, sex) or
number of patients aected, the details of manual therapy,
andcliniciantypethatmighthavecontributedtotheAE,
the reported AE, and its outcome. e data were extracted
by two independent coauthors (P. Y. and NY. G.) and double
checked to ensure matching and disagreements were resolved
by consensus. Since there are no widely accepted criteria for
judging the quality of AEs reports and the current studies’
objective of describing case details, we did not assess the risk
of bias on the included studies.
3. Results
e search strategy located  articles reporting a total of 
case reports (in which the patients’ age and/or sex were given)
(Table ), and a total of reports containing  AEs in case
series associated with massage were identied (Tab le ). Most
cases were reported from Asia especially in China (𝑛=24,
60%oftotal)andEurope(,30%), with few cases from the
USA (, 7.5%) and Australia (, 2.5%), and more than half
of the reported patients were female. ere are  signs or
symptoms of AEs in total, and the most common problems
included disc herniation ( cases, 16.3%), so tissue trauma
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
T : Cases of AEs associated with massage therapy.
Author (year) Country Language Age, sex Details of manual
therapy Clinician type Adverse event (nature and
location) Follow-up
Jay et al. () []USA English , F Chiropractic
manipulations Chiropractor
Bilateral dissection of
vertebral arteries followed
by bilateral
occipital-parietal
hemorrhagic infarction and
visual impairment
Complete resolution ( d.)
Beck et al. () []Germany English , F Axial tension and
rotation Chiropractor Intracranial hypotension Complete resolution
conrmed by MRI
Nadgir et al. () []USA English , M Neck manipulation Chiropractor
Neck cramping (bilateral
internal carotid and
vertebral artery dissection)
Minimal residual
hemianesthesia and
dysesthesia
Oehler et al. () []Germany German , F Chiropractic neck
manipulation Unknown Bilateral dissections of
vertebral arteries Resolution
Yokota et al. () []Japan Japanese , M Chiropractic neck
manipulation
Unregistered
practitioner
Dissection of le vertebral
artery followed by Dejerine
syndrome
Unknown
Licht et al. () []Denmark English , M Cervical
manipulation
General
practitioner
Large infarction in the le
cerebellar hemisphere
(presumably due to arterial
dissection)
Complete recovery ( mo.)
Xiong () []China Chinese , M Reduction
manipulation Not mentioned Cerebral infarction Irritating cough and limb
numbness ( y.)
MaandXu()[]China Chinese , F Rotation Not mentioned Peripheral ner ve
entrapment syndrome Recovered
Yu et al. () []China Chinese , M Manipulative
reduction Not mentioned Spinal cord injury Recovered ( mo.)
Yu et al. () []China Chinese , M Manipulative
reduction Not mentioned Spinal cord injury Symptom remission ( d.)
Zhang et al. () []China Chinese , M Rotation Not mentioned
Extrusion of lumbar
intervertebral discs (lower
limb pain, incontinence,
and saddle sensation
disorders)
Pain relief aer surgery, but
residual saddle area
numbness
Zhang et al. () []China Chinese , M Rotation Not mentioned
Extrusion of lumbar
intervertebral discs (lower
limb pain, walking and
sexual dysfunction)
Muscle recovery aer
surgery, but still sexual
dysfunction ( y.)
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
T : C o nt i n u e d .
Author (year) Country Language Age, sex Details of manual
therapy Clinician type Adverse event (nature and
location) Follow-up
Izquierdo-Casas et al. ()
[]Spain Spanish , F Chiropractic Not mentioned
Dissection of vertebral
artery followed by
tetraparesis
Locked-in syndrome
Morandi et al. () []France English , F Lumbar vertebral
manipulation Physician Caudal spinal cord
ischemia Permanent neuroloss
Saxler and Barden ()
[]Germany German , F
Cervical
chiropractic
manipulation
(C/), facet joint
inltration
Not mentioned
Epidural hematoma
extending from cervical to
sacral spine
Complete resolution
Tom´
eetal.()[]Spain Spanish Not noted Chiropractic
manipulation Not mentioned Multiple cervical disc
herniation Not mentioned
Hansis et al. () []Germany German , M Chiropractic
manipulation Unknown L fracture osteoporosis Surgery
Hansis et al. () []Germany German , M Unknown Unknown Disk protrusion Surgery
Wang et al. () []Australia English , F Lumbosacral
manipulation Unknown Extradural hemorrhagic
synovial cyst, leg pain
Complete recovery aer
L–L laminectomy and
cyst removal
Wang et al. () []Australia English , F Lumbosacral
manipulation Unknown
Hemorrhagic synovial cyst
with resultant lumbar canal
stenosis and exacerbation
of severe pain in buttock
and le leg pain
L-L laminectomy and
cystremovalwithexcellent
outcome
L. Zhang and G. H. Zhang
() []China Chinese , F Rotation Not mentioned Atlantoaxial dislocation Recovered aer surgery
( wk.)
Chen et al. () []Taiwan E ng l i s h  , M Chiropractic and
massage therapy Not mentioned
Neck pain, relieved by
chiropractor, hematoma of
ligamentum avum at the
level of C-C with
hemiparesis
Complete recovery aer
laminectomy ( y.)
Suh et al. () []Korea English , F Axial tension and
rotation Chiropractor Intracranial hypotension Complete resolution aer
epidural blood patch
Schmitz et al. () []Germany English , F Cervical
manipulation
General medical
practitioner
Displaced odontoid
fracture in the presence of
an aneurismal bone cyst
Complete recovery aer
surgery
Chen et al. () []China Chinese , F Rotation Self-treatment
by her husband
Cervical myelopathy (neck
pain, dizziness, and
numbness of limbs)
Recovered ( d.)
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
T : C o nt i n u e d .
Author (year) Country Language Age, sex Details of manual
therapy Clinician type Adverse event (nature and
location) Follow-up
Jing and Yang () []China Chinese , M Rotation Not mentioned Fracture and bulge of
intervertebral discs
Nearly full recovery aer
surgery
Solheim et al. () []Norway English , M
Lumbar
manipulation
therapy
Chiropractor
Partial cauda equina
syndrome due to spinal
epidural hematoma in the
L region
Surgical evacuation of
hematoma via L and L
laminectomies,
improvement with motor
decits, but the bladder
dysfunction remained
Guo et al. () []China Chinese , F
Lumbar
manipulation
therapy
Not mentioned Ribfracture(theseventh
rib) Not mentioned
Guo et al. () []China Chinese , M Cervical
manipulation Not mentioned Lacerations of so tissues Recovered ( mo.)
Guo et al. () []China Chinese , M
Lumbar
manipulation
therapy
Not mentioned Fracture (L transverse
process fractures) Not mentioned
Guo et al. () []China Chinese , F
Lumbar
manipulation
therapy
Not mentioned Fracture (L transverse
process fractures) Not mentioned
Guo et al. () []China Chinese , F Cervical
manipulation Not mentioned Syncope Not mentioned
Guo et al. () []China Chinese , M Rotation Not mentioned Fracture (proximal humeral
fracture) Not mentioned
Yi et al. () []China Chinese , F Cervical
manipulation Not mentioned Hypochondriacal neurosis Not mentioned
Yi et al. () []China Chinese , F
Cervical spine
manipulative
reduction
Not mentioned Hypochondriacal neurosis Recovered
Jiang () []China Chinese , M Rotation
Massage
therapist
(private clinics)
Brown-Sequard syndrome
due to spinal epidural
hematoma
Near full recovery aer
surgery ( w k.)
Huang et al. () []Taiwan En g l i s h , M
Manipulation
directed at the
lumbopelvic-thigh
region and massage
Physiotherapist Ruptureofsotissuetumor
at anterior proximal thigh
Surgical tumor resection,
and neither recurrence nor
metastasis was observed
months aer surgery
Zhu () []China Chinese , F Joint mobilization Not mentioned Hemarthrosis of knee joint Improved the joint activity
( mo.)
Jin et al. () []China Chinese , not noted Rotation Massage
therapist Dead Dead
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
T : C o nt i n u e d .
Author (year) Country Language Age, sex Details of manual
therapy Clinician type Adverse event (nature and
location) Follow-up
Tamburrelli et al. () []Italy Eng lish , M Spinal manipulation Doctor of
chiropractic
Cauda equina syndrome,
L-S extrusion
L laminotomy and L-S
discectomy,
improved, but with
persistent bowel
dysfunction, impotence,
lower extremity; pain,
paresthesias, and mild
sensory decit
Bi () []China Chinese , M Cervical
manipulation Not mentioned Dorsolateral medullary
syndrome Improved ( d.)
Zhang et al. () []China Chinese , F Rotation Massage doctor Atlantoaxial dislocation Near full recovery aer
surgery ( mo.)
Li et al. () []China Chinese , F Neck massage Not mentioned Vertebral arterial dissecting
aneurysm
Horner syndrome
disappeared and without
dysphagia ( mo.)
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
T : Case series of AEs associated with massage therapy.
Author (year) Country Language Cases Details of manual
therapy Clinician type Adverse event (nature
and location) Follow-up
Yo u n g a n d C h e n
() []Tai w a n E n g l i sh Cervical
manipulation Chiropractor
Vertebral artery
occlusion ( case);
stenosis ( case);
slow blood ow ( case)
associated with normal
ndings ( cases)
Recovered ( mo.)
Mei et al. () []China Chinese 
Rotatory
reduction
manipulation
Not mentioned
Nausea and profuse
sweating ( cases);
headache and vertigo (
cases); upper extremity
numbness ( cases);
cervical limitation of
activity ( cases); lower
limbs motor disturbance
( cases)
cases recovered,
 cases improved
Oppenheim et al.
() []USA English  Spinal
manipulation Chiropractor
Spinal cord injuries (
cases); cauda equina
syndrome ( cases);
radiculopathy ( cases);
pathological fracture (
cases)
 patients need
surgery, but half of
them made an excellent
recovery subsequently,
and one-third had a
good recovery
Wang ( ) [ ]China Chinese
Rotatory
reduction
manipulation
Not mentioned Lumbar intervertebral
disc extrusion
Fully recovered (
cases);
foot prolapse ( cases);
hypoesthesia ( case)
Wang et al. ()
[]China Chinese Neck massage Not mentioned Cervical disc herniation Recovered
Guo and Lu ()
[]China Chinese 
Rotation (
cases), tendon-
regulating
method ( cases)
Not mentioned
Simple so tissue injury
( cases);
cervical structural
damage ( cases)
Not mentioned
Qu et al. () []China Chinese Pressing
manipulation Not mentioned
Aggravated lumbar
intervertebral disc
extrusion
Recovered (– d.)
( cases, 11.1%), neurologic compromise ( cases, 8.5%),
spinal cord injury ( cases, 8.5%), dissection of the vertebral
arteries ( cases, 6.5%), bone fracture ( cases, 5.9%),
hematoma or hemorrhagic cyst ( cases, 3.9%), syncope (
cases, 3.9%), cauda equina syndrome ( cases, 2.6%), pain
( cases, 1.3%), dislocation ( cases, 1.3%), and others. e
symptoms are frequently life-threatening, though in most
cases the patient made a full recovery. In the majority of cases,
the problems were related to spinal manipulations, including
rotational movements, which seem to be the probable cause
of the AEs.
4. Discussion
OurprimaryobjectiveinreviewingthecasereportsofAEs
associated with massage has been to identify individual cases
and outbreaks of AEs then to analyze their possible causes, in
order to minimize the massage AEs in future and enhance
the practice safety within the profession. Of the  cases
involving the AEs following massage in  references (Tables
and ), spinal manipulation has repeatedly been reported
with serious AEs especially. Collectively, these data suggest
that massage is associated with frequent, mild, and transient
AEs, but sometimes it may also be indeed associated with
serious complications which can lead to permanent disability
or even death. Although important details of most cases are
poorly reported or frequently missing, these results have clear
clinical and research related implications comparatively.
e true risk of injury due to spinal manipulation is
still not known. Yet causal inferences may be not completely
reasonable. Vascular accidents may happen spontaneously
orcouldbecausedbyfactorsotherthanmassage.ereal
serious incidence of AEs has been estimated to be ranging
from strokes in , manipulations to . case series in
 million manipulations, and a rate of . deaths in  mil-
lion manipulations has been reported []. e insurance
industry claims []datasupportariskofstrokeasper
million manipulations. 99% of all chiropractors practicing in
Denmark completed a survey; they estimated that one case of
cerebrovascular accident occurred for every . million cervi-
cal treatment sessions. e occurrence increased to in every
, treatment sessions for upper cervical manipulations,
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
and they noted that techniques using rotational thrusts were
overrepresented in the frequency of injury.
A temporal relationship is insucient to establish causal-
ity, and recall bias can further obscure the truth. Moreover,
denominators are rarely available. Smaller randomized con-
trolled trials (RCTs) are unlikely to detect rare AEs, and better
reporting of AEs is required, obviously. erefore Senstad
et al. [] reported the data from prospective inves-
tigations of  adults who received chiropractic spinal
manipulation indicated that 30%to55%reportedaminor
adverse event. e most common were local discomfort
(% to %), radiating discomfort (10%to23%), headache
(10%to12%), tiredness (%), or nausea; dizziness, hot
skin, or “other” reactions are uncommonly reported (<%
of reactions). And of the reported reactions, reactions were
mild or moderate in 85%to90%ofpatients.64%ofreactions
appeared within hours of treatment, and 74%to83%had
disappeared within  hours. Interestingly, reactions are most
commonly reported by women and (for both genders) at the
beginning of the treatment series. Patients with long-lasting
problems are more likely to report treatment reactions, and
patients with no prior experience of chiropractic care do not
report more reactions than patients previously treated by chi-
ropractors. en Cagnie et al. [] recruited  new patients
treated with spinal manipulation by  physiotherapists
(Belgian). All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire
about AEs subsequently. 61%ofthepatientsreportedatleast
one AE, most of which were mild and transient, like headache
(20%), stiness (%), local discomfort (15%), radiating
discomfort (12%), and fatigue (12%). 61%oftheproblems
had started within hours aer manipulation; 64%had
resolved within  hours. No complicationswith long-lasting
consequences were reported. Hurwitz et al. []reported
the AEs documented in a -patient RCT which compared
spinal manipulation with spinal mobilization as treatments
for neck pain. 30% reported at least one AE. Patients receiving
spinal manipulation were more likely to experience AEs than
mobilization. e most frequently noted AEs were increase
of pain, headache, tiredness, and radiating pain. 80%of
theAEsbeganwithinhoursaertreatmentandwere
mild or of medium severity. No serious complications were
noted. e three prospective case series above corroborate
the results from several earlier studies []showingthatmild
tomoderateAEsoccurinalargeproportionofpatients
receivingspinalmanipulation,buttheseAEsaretransient
and nonserious. And recently,  patients were random-
ized to one of three treatment arms in a new study [],
to investigate dierences in occurrence of adverse events
between three dierent combinations of manual treatment
techniques used by manual therapists (i.e., chiropractors,
naprapaths, osteopaths, physicians, and physiotherapists) for
patients seeking care for back and/or neck pain. And adverse
events were measured with a questionnaire aer each return
visit and categorized into ve levels. As a result, the most
common adverse events were soreness in muscles, increased
pain, and stiness. e most frequent level of adverse event in
this study was short minor lasting less than  hours and was
rated less than or equal to three on the numeric rating scale
regarding severity. No serious adverse events were reported.
Clearly, we should dierentiate between various ap-
proaches. e above cases suggest that massage by nonpro-
fessional and forceful techniques is oen associated with
AEs. In cases the practitioners are massage therapists
(5.8% of total) and  are chiropractors (23.9%), while
in the other cases (70.3%)theyareunregisteredoreven
healthcare professionals only. So it might be unfair to assess
the AEs of spinal manipulation as practiced by well-trained
chiropractors alongside that associated with the untrained.
Obviously from above, a variety of dierent care providers
like physiotherapists, massage therapists, physicians, and
osteopaths may perform a manipulation as part of their
practice, but it should be most frequently performed by
chiropractors []. Certainly skill and experience are impor-
tant, and it is relevant to dierentiate between dierent
professions. But on the other hand, skill is a quality not easily
controlled and some therapists are more skilled than others.
Moreover,thisreviewisaimedatevaluatingtheAEsofan
intervention (massage) and not that of a profession (massage
therapist/chiropractic). at is why in this review we show
the implicated practitioners are not only chiropractors but
also physicians, physiotherapists, “bonesetters, and general
medical practitioners.
is systematic review has several limitations. Even
though the search strategy was deemed thorough, some rele-
vant published articles might have been missed. It is possible
that not all cases were identied in our searches. Although
this paper has resulted in a few papers to review, it still had its
strengths including the thorough search of the literature to
help reduce bias in the review. We searched multiple relevant
electronic databases and used two coauthors to determine
articles for inclusion in the review and to evaluate the liter-
ature. But because of the inherent nature of case reports and
other anecdotal reports, it is impossible to make inferences
regarding cause and eect. erefore, it is not known whether
the serious AEs in cases identied in this review were caused
by massage and whether the association between therapy
and event was accidental or not. So the safety in massage
is still far from being achieved. Further investigations are
urgent to assess denite conclusions regarding this issue. In
the meantime, it should be necessary to establish a system of
risk alert for guaranteed sur veillance on this type of CAM and
safe practice guidelines are required and could continue to be
enforced.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, although serious AEs associated with massage
in general and pain-related massage in particular are few,
massage therapies are not totally devoid of risks. Spinal
manipulation in massage has repeatedly been associated with
serious AEs especially. But the incidence of such events is
probably low. Adequate regulation could further minimize
the risks. So we recommend that not only adequate training in
biomedical knowledge for practitioners, such as anatomy and
microbiology, but also safe practice guidelines are required
andshouldcontinuetobeenforcedinordertominimize
massage AEs.
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Conflict of Interests
e authors declare that there is no conict of interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
Authors’ Contribution
Ping Yin and Ningyang Gao made equal contributions to this
paper.
Acknowledgments
e work in Austria was supported by the Federal Ministries
of Science, Research and Economy and of Health (project
title: “Evidence-based high-tech acupuncture and integrative
laser medicine for prevention and early intervention of
chronic diseases”).
References
[] L. Lidell, e Book of Massage: e Complete Step-by-Step Guide
to Eastern and Western Technique, Simon & Schuster, New York,
NY, USA, .
[] M. Snyder, Independent Nursing Interventions,Delmar,Albany,
NY, USA, nd edition, .
[] F. Tappan, Healing Massage Techniques: Holistic, Classic, and
Emerging Methods, Appleton & Lange, East Norwalk, Conn,
USA, .
[] Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Curriculum Framework,CSP,
London, UK, .
[]G.Bronfort,R.Evans,A.V.Anderson,K.H.Svendsen,Y.
Bracha, and R. H. Grimm, “Spinal manipulation, medication,
or home exercise with advice for acute and subacute neck pain:
a randomized trial, Annals of Internal Medicine,vol.,no.,
part , pp. –, .
[] M. Underwood, “United Kingdom back pain exercise and
manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: eectiveness of
physical treatments for back pain in primary care, e British
Medical Journal,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] G.Jull,P.Trott,H.Potteretal.,“Arandomizedcontrolledtrialof
exercise and manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache,
Spine,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] P. J. Tuchin, H. Pollard, and R. Bonello, A randomized con-
trolled trial of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for
migraine, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological erapeu-
tics,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] G. Bronfort, M. Haas, R. Evans, B. Leininger, and J. Triano,
“Eectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report,
Chiropractic & Osteopathy,vol.,article,.
[] R. Chou, A. Qaseem, V. Snow et al., Diagnosis and treatment
of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from
the American College of Physicians and the American Pain
Society, Annals of Internal Medicine,vol.,no.,pp.,
.
[] O. Airaksinen, J. I. Brox, C. Cedraschi et al., “Chapter : Euro-
pean guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecic low
back pain, European Spine Journal,vol.,supplement,pp.
S–S, .
[] A. Chaibi, P. J. Tuchin, and M. B. Russell, “Manual therapies for
migraine: a systematic review, Journal of Headache and Pain,
vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] P. M. Barnes, B. Bloom, and R. L. Nahin, “Complementary and
alternative medicine use among adults and children: United
States, , National health statistics reports, no. , pp. –,
.
[] W. J. J. Assendel, L. M. Bouter, and P. G. Knipschild, Compli-
cations of spinal manipulation: a comprehensive review of the
literature, Journal of Family Practice,vol.,no.,pp.,
.
[]A.R.Gross,T.Kay,M.Hondrasetal.,“Manualtherapy
for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review, Manual
erapy,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] P.G.Shekelle,A.H.Adams,M.R.Chassin,E.L.Hurwitz,and
R. H. Brook, “Spinal manipulation for low-back pain, Annals of
Internal Medicine,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] W. M. Jay, M. I. Shah, and M. J. Schneck, Bilateral occipital-
parietal hemorrhagic infarctions following chiropractic cervical
manipulation, Seminars in Ophthalmology,vol.,no.,pp.
–, .
[] J. Beck, A. Raabe, V. Seifert, and E. Dettmann, Intracranial
hypotension aer chiropractic manipulation of the cervical
spine, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry,vol.
,no.,pp.,.
[] R. N. Nadgir, L. A. Loevner, T. Ahmed et al., “Simultaneous
bilateral internal carotid and vertebral artery dissection follow-
ing chiropractic manipulations: case report and review of the
literature, Neuroradiolog y,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] J. Oehler, J. Gandjour, J. Fi eb ach, and S. Schwab, “Bilateral
vertebral artery dissection aer chiropractic treatment, Der
Orthop¨
ade,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[]J.Yokota,Y.Amakusa,Y.Tomita,andS.Takahashi,“e
medial medullary infarction (Dejerine syndrome) following
chiropractic neck manipulation, No To Shinkei,vol.,no.,
pp. –, .
[] P. B. Licht,H. W. Christensen, and P. F.Høi lund-Carlsen, “Is cer-
vical spinal manipulation dangerous?” Journal of Manipulative
and Physiological erapeutics,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] G. Y. Xiong, “One case report of brain stem infract induced
by cervical manipulation, Henan Medicine,vol.,no.,p.
, .
[] B. Ma and J. S. Xu, “Pulling of shoulder joints around the nerve
compressionsymptomsincases,Chinese Manipulation and
Qi Gong erapy,vol.,no.,article,.
[] Z.M.Yu,S.C.Wang,andS.L.He,“TwocasesreportofSpinal
cord injury induced by Manipulative reduction, e Journal of
Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia, vol. , no. , article , .
[] S. T. Zhang, R. Z. Sun, T. S. Wu, and Y. C. Liu, “e obligue
pulling by the method of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion
of the dural sac in cases, e ]ournal of Cervicodynia and
Lumbodynia, vol. , no. , p. , .
[] J. Izquierdo-Casas, L. Soler-Singla, E. Vivas-D´
ıaz, E. Balaguer-
Mart´
ınez, T. Sola-Mart´
ınez, and L. Guimaraens-Mart´
ınez,
“Locked-in syndrome due to a vertebral dissection and ther-
apeutic options with intraarterial brinolysis in acute phase,
Revista de Neurologia,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] X. Morandi, L. Riaud, J. Houedakor, S. F. A. Amlashi, G.
Brassier, and P. Gallien, “Caudal spinal cord ischemia aer
lumbar vertebral manipulation, Joint Bone Spine,vol.,no.,
pp. –, .
[] G. Saxler and B. Barden, “Extensive spinal epidural hema-
toma—an uncommon entity following cervical chiropractic
manipulation, Zeitschri fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete,
vol.,no.,pp.,.
 Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
[] F. Tom´
e, A. Barriga, and L. Espejo, “Multiple disc herniation
aer chiropractic manipulation, Revistademedicinadela
Universidad de Navarra,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] M. L. Hansis, B. Weber, U. Smentkowski, and P. Schr¨
ader,
Accusations of malpractice in chirotherapeutic treatment,
Orthopade,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] Y. Y. Wang, P. McKelvie, N. Trost, and M. A. Murphy, “Trauma
as a precipitant of haemorrhage in synovial cysts,” Journal of
Clinical Neuroscience, vol. , no. , pp. –, .
[] L. Zhang and G. H. Zhang, “One case report of atlantoaxial
dislocation induced by cervical manipulation, Occupation and
Health,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] H.C.Chen,P.W.Hsu,C.Y.Lin,andW.C.Tzaan,“Symptomatic
hematoma of cervical ligamentum avum: case report, Spine,
vol. , no. , pp. E–E, .
[] S. Suh, S. Koh, E. Choi et al., “Intracranial hypotension induced
by cervical spine chiropractic manipulation, Spine.,vol.,no.
, pp. E–, .
[] A. Schmitz, G. Lutterbey, L. Von Engelhardt, M. Von Falken-
hausen, and M. Stoel, “Pathological cervical fracture aer
spinal manipulation in a pregnant patient, Journal of Manipu-
lative and Physiological erapeutics,vol.,no.,pp.,
.
[] Y.S.Chen,M.Q.Zhao,andX.M.Peng,“Onecasereportof
cervical spondylotic myelopathy induced by cervical manipu-
lation, Chinese Manipulation and Qi Gong erapy,vol.,no.
, p. , .
[]X.Q.JingandS.S.Yang,“Onecasereportoffractureofa
cervical vertebrae and multiple disc bulging induced by cervical
pulling technique, JournalofClinicalMedicalOcer,vol.,
no.,p.,.
[] O. Solheim, J. V. Jorgensen, and O. P. Nygaard, “Lumbar
epidural hematoma aer chiropractic manipulation for lower-
back pain: case report, Neurosurgery,vol.,no.,pp.E
E, .
[ ] Y. K. Gu o , G . Q . L i, a nd C . Y. Liu , “A n a lys i s of a cc id e n t al
trauma cases caused by massage, Journal of Practical Medical
Techn i q u e s ,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] H.C.Yi,J.Qin,D.F.Zhao,andY.H.Wang,“Analysisofcases
caused by cervical spondylosis of hypochondriacal neurosis
gimmick reset, Journal of Chinese Misdiagnostics,vol.,no.,
p. , .
[] C. J. Jiang, “Cervical epidural hematoma and brown in case
of Sequard syndrome caused by cer vical spine, Journal of
Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine,vol.,no.,pp.
–, .
[] K. Huang, P. Hsieh, K. Lee, and R. W. Hsu, “Rapidly enlarg-
ing thigh swelling aer manipulative therapy: an unexpected
response to therapy, Manual erapy,vol.,no.,pp.,
.
[] Y. Zhu, Analysis of one case with Hemarthrosis of knee joint
caused by Error treatment, Journal of Chinese Misdiagnostics,
vol.,no.,article,.
[] B. Jin, Z. B. Han, X. Lin, and S. Wu, “One case report of death
induced by neck massage, Journal of Forensic Medicine,vol.,
no. , pp. –, .
[] F. C. Tamburrelli, M. Genitiempo, and C. A. Logroscino,
“Cauda equina syndrome and spine manipulation: case report
and review of the literature, European Spine Journal,vol.,
supplement , pp. S–S, .
[] L. Z. Bi, “Neck massage to dorsolateral medullary syndrome,
Clinical Misdiagnosis and Mistherapy,vol.,no.,pp.,
.
[] J. D. Zhang, H. S. Ma, R. Tan, D. Wang, W. Yuan, and C. Chi,
“One case of atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation caused by xed
neck massage, Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord,vol.,
no. , pp. –, .
[] X.Li,Y.Q.Liu,F.F.Su,andH.Liu,“Acaseofarterydissection
neck skull caused by neck massage, Journal of Brain and
Nervous Diseases,vol.,no.,p.,.
[] Y. H. Young and C. H. Chen, Acute vertigo following cervical
manipulation, Laryngoscope,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] J. W. Mei, W. J. Liang, and G. K. Wei, Analysis of  case
accidents caused by cervical manipulation, China Journal of
Trauma tol o g y ,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] J. S. Oppenheim, D. E. Spitzer, and D. H. Segal, “Nonvascular
complications following spinal manipulation, e Spine Jour-
nal,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] C. R. Wang, “Massage lumbar disc prolapse induced by acute
rupture (a report of cases), Journal of Practical Orthopaedics,
vol. , no. , pp. –, .
[] L. S. Wang, Z. Xia, and G. X. Hu, Analysis of case cervical
disc herniation caused by Leisure massage, Journal of Chinese
Misdiagnostics,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] J. T. Guo and Y. Lu, Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging
of neck injury caused by massage, Medical Journal of Beijing
Militar y Region,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] C.Z.Qu,N.H.Hu,andH.W.Wei,“Analysisandcorrection
method of disc herniation symptoms of lumbar caused by
accidental pressing technique, e New Journal of Traditional
Chinese Medicine, vol. , no. , pp. –, .
[] A. J. Barrett and A. C. Breen, Adverse eects of spinal
manipulation, JournaloftheRoyalSocietyofMedicine,vol.,
no.,pp.,.
[]B.Cagnie,E.Vinck,A.Beernaert,andD.Cambier,“How
common are side eects of spinal manipulation and can these
side eects be predicted?” Manual erapy,vol.,no.,pp.
, .
[] L. O. Gouveia, P. Castanho, and J. J. Ferreira, Safety of chiro-
practic interventions: a systematic review, Spine,vol.,no.,
pp.EE,.
[] N. Klougart, C. Leboeuf-Yde, and L. R. Rasmussen, “Safety in
chiropractic practice. Part I: the occurrence of cerebrovascular
accidents aer manipulation to the neck in Denmark from -
, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological erapeutics,
vol. , no. , pp. –, .
[] O. Senstad, C. Leboeuf-Yde, and C. F. Borchgrevink, “Side-
eects of chiropractic spinal manipulation: types frequency,
discomfort and course, S candinavian Journal of Primary Health
Care,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] O. Senstad, C. Leboeuf-Yde, and C. Borchgrevink, “Frequency
and characteristics of side eects of spinal manipulative ther-
apy, Spine,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] C. Leboeuf-Yde, B. Hennius, E. Rudberg, P. Leufvenmark,
and M. unman, “Side eects of chiropractic treatment: a
prospective study, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological
erapeutics,vol.,no.,pp.,.
[] E. L. Hurwitz, H. Morgenstern, M. Vassilaki, and L. Chiang,
Adverse reactions to chiropractic treatment and their eects
on satisfaction and clinical outcomes among patients enrolled
in the UCLA Neck Pain Study, Journal of Manipulative and
Physiological erapeutics,vol.,no.,pp.,.
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 
[] E. Ernst, “Prospective investigations into the safety of spinal
manipulation, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,vol.
,no.,pp.,.
[] K. Paanalahti, L. W. Holm, M. Nordin, M. Asker, J. Lyander,
and E. Skillgate, “Adverse events aer manual therapy among
patients seeking care for neck and/or back pain: a randomized
controlled trial, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,vol.,article
, .
[] W. C. Meeker and S. Haldeman, “Chiropractic: a profession at
the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine, Annals
of Internal Medicine,vol.,no.,pp.,.
... Feasibility measures included rate of recruitment and completion (No. of referred, No. of eligible, No. of enrolled, No. of withdrawals, study recruitment rate, and study completion rate), patient safety (No. and severity of adverse events), treatment adherence (range and average time of message session, No. of completed sessions and missed sessions) and compliance (No. of completing the study in the originally assigned group). The therapist was instructed to pay particular attention to the adverse events as reported by a systematic review of adverse events of massage therapy in pain-related conditions, including soreness, soft tissue trauma, neurologic compromise, bone fracture, hematoma or hemorrhagic cyst, syncope, cauda equina syndrome, pain, and dislocation (34). ...
... Moreover, the TCM we propose is relatively safe. In a systematic review of adverse events of massage therapy in pain-related conditions, researchers found that serious adverse events associated with massage in general and pain-related massage are very few (34). Another strength of our study is our study population who is predominantly middle-aged unemployed African Americans who were living alone. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is prevalent in people with human immunodeficiency virus (PHIV) with no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment. Therapeutic Chinese massage (TCM) is a promising noninvasive and non-harmful intervention for HIV-related PN. However, relevant research is lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of TCM for HIV-related PN. Method We conducted a pilot, single-centered, two-arm, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Twenty eligible PHIV were recruited primarily from the AIDS Foundation Houston, Inc. in Texas and were randomly assigned into two groups. Ten participants in the intervention group received three weekly 25-min TCM sessions by a certified TCM therapist. The remaining ten control group participants received the same therapist’s three weekly 25-min placebo massage sessions on their lower extremities. The outcome was the feasibility of this study as measured by recruitment and completion rates, participant safety, and treatment adherence and compliance, as well as the effect size of the intervention. Results The study population comprised 20 PHIV (mean age 55.23). This study showed high feasibility as measured by a high rate of recruitment, a 100% rate of completion, and zero serious adverse events. As we inquired 21 respondents for eligibility for the study, all except one had HIV-related PN. All respondents were willing to participate in the study and adhered to the group assignment after they enrolled in the study. The participants’ baseline pain was at a medium to a high level (6.30 [2.15] out of 10). Conclusion Chinese massage is a feasible intervention in PHIV. Future relevant randomized controlled trials are expected. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT05379140.
... Massage therapy Minor nerve injuries, bruises, and blood clot dislodgment [195] 9 Aromatherapy Allergic reactions, headache, respiratory issues, drug interactions, CNS overstimulation. [196] 10 Chiropractor Therapy Vertebral artery dissection, neck pain, and slipped disc [197] 11 ...
Article
Full-text available
Despite rapid advances in stroke management and rehabilitation therapy, no effective treatment is available for the later recovery phase following stroke. Therefore, complementary and alternative medicine system (CAM) has emerged as promising adjunct therapy for stroke management. CAM has its own cultural and philosophical aspects with different societies that drive as an inspiration and perception of less harmful and more effective strategies for stroke rehabilitation. However, robust scientific studies are required to establish CAM as an alternative therapy adjunct to conventional stroke treatment. A thorough literature search was performed using standard web databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Scopus using ‘complementary and alternative medicine in stroke’ as the major keyword. Research and review articles containing latest preclinical and clinical studies were primarily included in this review. Moreover, different stroke treatment strategies mentioned in ancient scriptures were also considered. CAM therapy is parallelly practiced along with clinically approved stroke therapy worldwide. It has been also reported beneficial on post-stroke neurorehabilitation in different population-based studies. Currently, CAM suffers various limitations, including defined end-point, clear outcomes, the exact mechanism of action, and proper assessment of the patient’s physical and emotional needs. Nevertheless, CAM is being used to treat various diseases globally. However, their usage pattern differs according to a population's geography and socio-cultural background. The review briefly discusses different CAM used as stroke rehabilitation therapy and their promising role in adjunct stroke management strategies.
... Chinese Tuina, a traditional alternative therapy used in China for thousands of years, has been shown to improve microcirculation and promote blood flow. As a safe therapeutic option with fewer adverse effects, Chinese Tuina has notable advantages for pain alleviation and improving physical function [11,12]. ...
... The investigators will assess the adverse events, defined as unexpected or adverse reactions occurring during or after treatment. In this experiment, adverse events [26] will be defined as (1) syncope, (2) ecchymosis, (3) increased pain, (4) fracture, and (5) skin allergy. The investigator will assess and solve the adverse events during the study, reporting them to the appropriate departments and ethics committees. ...
Article
Background Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has become a serious public health and socioeconomic problem. Tuina is a Chinese medicine treatment method based on meridian acupuncture theory and modern anatomy. Tuina can relieve pain and muscle tension and improve functional disorders; this massage is performed by pressing, kneading, pushing, pulling, and shaking the skin, muscles, and bones. However, the mechanism of action and the effect of Tuina as an external treatment on the activities of the central nervous system to relieve LDH pain is unclear. Therefore, we performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which is widely used in pain-related research, as it can detect the effects of different types of pain on brain activity. Objective Our randomized controlled parallel-group trial aims to compare the effects of Tuina with those of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with traction in patients with LDH. Methods This trial will be conducted between May 2024 and April 2025 in the Rehabilitation Hospital affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Seventy-six participants with LDH will be enrolled for this trial and randomly assigned to 2 groups: Tuina intervention group and TENS with traction intervention group. Participants in both groups will receive treatment for 14 days. fMRI will be performed for the main pain measurements by assessing the effect of the intervention on brain activity before and after the end of the intervention. Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, pressure pain thresholds, and the Oswestry disability index will be used to reflect the degree of pain and lumbar dysfunction, and the results will be used as secondary outcome measurements. Results The study protocol has been approved by the ethics review committee of The Rehabilitation Hospital affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. This study was registered on May 1, 2024, with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Data collection began on May 2024 and is expected to end on April 2025. Currently, data from this trial are in the collection phase, and no data analysis has been performed. As of July 1, 2024, we have collected data from 21 patients. The results of this trial are expected to be submitted for publication in September 2025. Conclusions This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of Tuina with that of TENS with traction in the treatment of patients with LDH and will show the cerebral mechanism of Tuina in LDH treatment by using fMRI. The results of our trial will be helpful in clarifying the cerebral mechanism of Tuina in the treatment of LDH and provide a solid foundation for Tuina therapy research. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400083784; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=225157 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/63852
... The primary AEs were limited to minor skin damage, such as subcutaneous bleeding. These findings align with the previous study investigating AEs associated with NPTCM [45]. Notably, in addition to being influenced by study design and intervention features, the prevention of AEs can also be regulated by the proficiency and expertise of the operators [46]. ...
Article
Full-text available
With the successive release of the CONSORT extensions for acupuncture, moxibustion, cupping, and Tuina/massage, this review aims to assess the reporting characteristics and quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on these specific guidelines. A comprehensive review was conducted by searching multiple databases, including Embase, Ovid MEDLINE(R), All EBM Reviews, AMED, CNKI, VIP Chinese Medical Journal Database, and Wanfang Data, for publications from January 1 to December 31, 2022. Two reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of the records, extracted predetermined information, and assessed the reporting based on the STRICTA, STRICTOM, STRICTOC, and STRICTOTM checklists. Among the included 387 studies (acupuncture, 213; Tuina/massage, 85; moxibustion, 73; cupping, 16), the overall reporting compliance averaged 56.0%, with acupuncture leading at 62.6%, followed by cupping (60.2%), moxibustion (53.1%), and Tuina/massage (47.9%). About half of the evaluated items showed poor reporting (compliance rate < 65%). Notably, international journals demonstrated significantly higher reporting quality than Chinese journals (P < 0.05). Although acupuncture trials had relatively higher compliance rates, deficiencies persist in reporting non-pharmacological therapies of Chinese medicine, particularly in areas like treatment environment details and provider background information.
Article
Introduction Hemothorax is defined as an accumulation of blood, whereas pneumothorax is defined as the presence of air, in the pleural cavity. This case report presents hemopneumothorax as the aftermath of thoracic trauma from traditional body massage, which is a common practice in Indonesia. Case presentation A 31-year-old male was referred due to dyspnea a day after getting a traditional whole-body massage. Thoracocentesis and chest tube insertion were performed. The production of blood was massive, causing the patient to deteriorate. Emergency thoracotomy exploration was performed to stop the bleeding and evacuate the hematoma. Eventually, the patient had an uneventful recovery. Discussion In this case, the force of massage in the thorax area causes rupture of a pre-existing bullae, causing hemopneumothorax, which causes a life-threatening consequence. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential. Conclusion External pressure force can lead to the rupture of a pre-existing bullae or bleb, resulting in hemopneumothorax. This case of novel hemopneumothorax should increase awareness to healthcare providers and the public about the adverse effect of overly intense body massage.
Article
Importance Late radiation-associated dysphagia (RAD) after head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment is challenging and commonly treatment refractory, with fibrosis stiffening connective tissues and compressing peripheral nerve tracts, contributing to diminished strength and possibly denervation of swallowing muscles. Manual therapy (MT), while common for cancer-related pain and other indications, remains largely unstudied for fibrosis-related late RAD. Objective To determine the feasibility and safety of MT, estimate effect size and durability of MT for associated improvements in cervical range of motion (CROM), and examine functional outcomes after MT in survivors of HNC with fibrosis-related late RAD. Design, Setting, and Participants This nonrandomized clinical trial, Manual Therapy for Fibrosis-Related Late Effect (MANTLE) Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors, is a prospective, single-institution, pilot, single-arm supportive care trial conducted at a National Comprehensive Cancer Network–designated academic comprehensive cancer center. Participants were adult survivors of HNC who were disease free at 2 or more years after curative-intent radiotherapy with grade 2 or higher fibrosis (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0) and grade 2 or higher dysphagia (per video fluoroscopy Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity [DIGEST]). Data were collected June 2018 to July 2021 and analyzed November 2022 to November 2024. Intervention MANTLE included 10 hourly MT sessions by lymphedema-certified speech-language pathologists over 6 weeks with a home exercise program. During the subsequent 6-week washout period, participants implemented only the home exercise program, without clinician MT. Outcomes and Measures Primary end points were feasibility (per therapy completion rate, with a 75% target) and safety. Secondary end points included functional outcomes per CROM, dysphagia severity (per DIGEST), maximum interincisal opening (MIO), and validated participant-reported outcomes (PROs). Results Among 24 survivors of HNC (20 male [83.3%]; median [range] age, 68 [53-80] years), there was a median (range) of 8.9 (2.4-30.2) years after curative-intent radiotherapy. A total of 22 participants (91.7%) completed the 10 prescribed therapy sessions, and 1 participant experienced a severe adverse event. Secondary end points improved among participants who completed the therapy: MIO ( r = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.94) and all 6 planes of CROM (eg, cervical extension: r = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.93) improved, with large effect sizes from baseline to after MT. Large to moderate effect sizes were achieved in symptom measures per PROs (eg, lymphedema-fibrosis symptom severity after MT: r = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). However, effect sizes were small to moderate or null in uncompensated swallowing outcome measures (eg, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory composite score from baseline to after MT: r = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.73). Conclusions This study found that MT was safe and feasible in long-term survivors of HNC with late RAD and was associated with several functional, physical, and psychosocial gains. This trial may offer insight into next directions to optimize swallowing outcomes by integrating MT into a comprehensive rehabilitation program. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03612531
Article
Background: Massage is widely used for neck pain, but its effectiveness remains unclear. Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of massage compared to placebo or sham, no treatment or exercise as an adjuvant to the same co-intervention for acute to chronic persisting neck pain in adults with or without radiculopathy, including whiplash-associated disorders and cervicogenic headache. Search methods: We searched multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Index to Chiropractic Literature, trial registries) to 1 October 2023. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any type of massage with sham or placebo, no treatment or wait-list, or massage as an adjuvant treatment, in adults with acute, subacute or chronic neck pain. Data collection and analysis: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We transformed outcomes to standardise the direction of the effect (a smaller score is better). We used a partially contextualised approach relative to identified thresholds to report the effect size as slight-small, moderate or large-substantive. Main results: We included 33 studies (1994 participants analysed). Selection (82%) and detection bias (94%) were common; multiple trials had unclear allocation concealment, utilised a placebo that may not be credible and did not test whether blinding to the placebo was effective. Massage was compared with placebo (n = 10) or no treatment (n = 8), or assessed as an adjuvant to the same co-treatment (n = 15). The trials studied adults aged 18 to 70 years, 70% female, with mean pain severity of 51.8 (standard deviation (SD) 14.1) on a visual analogue scale (0 to 100). Neck pain was subacute-chronic and classified as non-specific neck pain (85%, including n = 1 whiplash), radiculopathy (6%) or cervicogenic headache (9%). Trials were conducted in outpatient settings in Asia (n = 11), America (n = 5), Africa (n = 1), Europe (n = 12) and the Middle East (n = 4). Trials received research funding (15%) from research institutes. We report the main results for the comparison of massage versus placebo. Low-certainty evidence indicates that massage probably results in little to no difference in pain, function-disability and health-related quality of life when compared against a placebo for subacute-chronic neck pain at up to 12 weeks follow-up. It may slightly improve participant-reported treatment success. Subgroup analysis by dose showed a clinically important difference favouring a high dose (≥ 8 sessions over four weeks for ≥ 30 minutes duration). There is very low-certainty evidence for total adverse events. Data on patient satisfaction and serious adverse events were not available. Pain was a mean of 20.55 points with placebo and improved by 3.43 points with massage (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.16 better to 1.29 worse) on a 0 to 100 scale, where a lower score indicates less pain (8 studies, 403 participants; I2 = 39%). We downgraded the evidence to low-certainty due to indirectness; most trials in the placebo comparison used suboptimal massage doses (only single sessions). Selection, performance and detection bias were evident as multiple trials had unclear allocation concealment, utilised a placebo that may not be credible and did not test whether blinding was effective, respectively. Function-disability was a mean of 30.90 points with placebo and improved by 9.69 points with massage (95% CI 17.57 better to 1.81 better) on the Neck Disability Index 0 to 100, where a lower score indicates better function (2 studies, 68 participants; I2 = 0%). We downgraded the evidence to low-certainty due to imprecision (the wide CI represents slight to moderate benefit that does not rule in or rule out a clinically important change) and risk of selection, performance and detection biases. Participant-reported treatment success was a mean of 3.1 points with placebo and improved by 0.80 points with massage (95% CI 1.39 better to 0.21 better) on a Global Improvement 1 to 7 scale, where a lower score indicates very much improved (1 study, 54 participants). We downgraded the evidence to low-certainty due to imprecision (single study with a wide CI that does not rule in or rule out a clinically important change) and risk of performance as well as detection bias. Health-related quality of life was a mean of 43.2 points with placebo and improved by 5.30 points with massage (95% CI 8.24 better to 2.36 better) on the SF-12 (physical) 0 to 100 scale, where 0 indicates the lowest level of health (1 study, 54 participants). We downgraded the evidence once for imprecision (a single small study) and risk of performance and detection bias. We are uncertain whether massage results in increased total adverse events, such as treatment soreness, sweating or low blood pressure (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.08 to 11.55; 2 studies, 175 participants; I2 = 77%). We downgraded the evidence to very low-certainty due to unexplained inconsistency, risk of performance and detection bias, and imprecision (the CI was extremely wide and the total number of events was very small, i.e < 200 events). Authors' conclusions: The contribution of massage to the management of neck pain remains uncertain given the predominance of low-certainty evidence in this field. For subacute and chronic neck pain (closest to 12 weeks follow-up), massage may result in a little or no difference in improving pain, function-disability, health-related quality of life and participant-reported treatment success when compared to a placebo. Inadequate reporting on adverse events precluded analysis. Focused planning for larger, adequately dosed, well-designed trials is needed.
Article
Full-text available
The safety of the manual treatment techniques such as spinal manipulation has been discussed and there is a need for more information about potential adverse events after manual therapy. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate differences in occurrence of adverse events between three different combinations of manual treatment techniques used by manual therapists (i.e. chiropractors, naprapaths, osteopaths, physicians and physiotherapists) for patients seeking care for back and/or neck pain. In addition women and men were compared regarding the occurrence of adverse events. Participants were recruited among patients, ages 18-65, seeking care at the educational clinic of the Scandinavian College of Naprapathic Manual Medicine in Stockholm. The patients (n = 767) were randomized to one of three treatment arms 1) manual therapy (i.e. spinal manipulation, spinal mobilization, stretching and massage) (n = 249), 2) manual therapy excluding spinal manipulation (n = 258) and 3) manual therapy excluding stretching (n = 260). Treatments were provided by students in the seventh semester of total eight. Adverse events were measured with a questionnaire after each return visit and categorized in to five levels; 1) short minor, 2) long minor, 3) short moderate, 4) long moderate and 5) serious adverse events, based on the duration and/or severity of the event. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between adverse event and treatments arms. The most common adverse events were soreness in muscles, increased pain and stiffness. No differences were found between the treatment arms concerning the occurrence of adverse event. Fifty-one percent of patients, who received at least three treatments, experienced at least one adverse event after one or more visits. Women more often had short moderate adverse events (OR = 2.19 (95% CI: 1.52-3.15)), and long moderate adverse events (OR = 2.49 (95% CI: 1.77-3.52)) compared to men. Adverse events after manual therapy are common and transient. Excluding spinal manipulation or stretching do not affect the occurrence of adverse events. The most common adverse event is soreness in the muscles. Women reports more adverse events than men.Trial registration: This trial was registered in a public registry (Current Controlled Trials) (ISRCTN92249294).
Article
Recommendation 1: Clinicians should conduct a focused history and physical examination to help place patients with low back pain into 1 of 3 broad categories: nonspecific low back pain, back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or back pain potentially associated with another specific spinal cause. The history should include assessment of psychosocial risk factors, which predict risk for chronic disabling back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 2: Clinicians should not routinely obtain imaging or other diagnostic tests in patients with nonspecific low back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 3: Clinicians should perform diagnostic imaging and testing for patients with low back pain when severe or progressive neurologic deficits are present or when serious underlying conditions are suspected on the basis of history and physical examination (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 4: Clinicians should evaluate patients with persistent low back pain and signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging (preferred) or computed tomography only if they are potential candidates for surgery or epidural steroid injection (for suspected radiculopathy) (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 5: Clinicians should provide patients with evidence-based information on low back pain with regard to their expected course, advise patients to remain active, and provide information about effective self-care options (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 6: For patients with low back pain, clinicians should consider the use of medications with proven benefits in conjunction with back care information and self-care. Clinicians should assess severity of baseline pain and functional deficits, potential benefits, risks, and relative lack of long-term efficacy and safety data before initiating therapy (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). For most patients, first-line medication options are acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recommendation 7: For patients who do not improve with self-care options, clinicians should consider the addition of nonpharmacologic therapy with proven benefits-for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pain, intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or progressive relaxation (weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
Article
Objective To estimate the effect of adding exercise classes, spinal manipulation delivered in NHS or private premises, or manipulation followed by exercise to "best care" in general practice for patients consulting with back pain. Design Pragmatic randomised trial with factorial design. Setting 181 general practices in Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework; 63 community settings around 14 centres across the United Kingdom. Participants 1334 patients consulting their general practices about low back pain. Main outcome measures Scores on the Roland Morris disability questionnaire at three and 12 months, adjusted for centre and baseline scores. Results All groups improved over time. Exercise improved mean disability questionnaire scores at three months by 1.4 (95% confidence interval 0.6 to 2.1) more than "best care." For manipulation the additional improvement was 1.6 (0.8 to 2.3) at three months and 1.0 (0.2 to 1.8) at 12 months. For manipulation followed by exercise the additional improvement was 1.9 (1.2 to 2.6) at three months and 1.3 (0.5 to 2.1) at 12 months. No significant differences in Outcome occurred between manipulation in NHS premises and in private premises. No serious adverse events occur-red. Conclusions Relative to "best care" in general practice, manipulation followed by exercise achieved a moderate benefit at three months and a small benefit at 12 months; spinal manipulation achieved a small to moderate benefit at three months and a small benefit at 12 months; and exercise achieved a small benefit at three months but not at 12 months.
Article
Recommendation 1: Clinicians should conduct a focused history and physical examination to help place patients with low back pain into 1 of 3 broad categories: nonspecific low back pain, back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or back pain potentially associated with another specific spinal cause. The history should include assessment of psychosocial risk factors, which predict risk for chronic disabling back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 2: Clinicians should not routinely obtain imaging or other diagnostic tests in patients with nonspecific low back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 3: Clinicians should perform diagnostic imaging and testing for patients with low back pain when severe or progressive neurologic deficits are present or when serious underlying conditions are suspected on the basis of history and physical examination (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 4: Clinicians should evaluate patients with persistent low back pain and signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging (preferred) or computed tomography only if they are potential candidates for surgery or epidural steroid injection (for suspected radiculopathy) (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 5: Clinicians should provide patients with evidence-based information on low back pain with regard to their expected course, advise patients to remain active, and provide information about effective self-care options (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 6: For patients with low back pain, clinicians should consider the use of medications with proven benefits in conjunction with back care information and self-care. Clinicians should assess severity of baseline pain and functional deficits, potential benefits, risks, and relative lack of long-term efficacy and safety data before initiating therapy (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). For most patients, first-line medication options are acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recommendation 7: For patients who do not improve with selfcare options, clinicians should consider the addition of nonpharmacologic therapy with proven benefits—for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pain, intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or progressive relaxation (weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
Article
A 31-year-old woman suffered a brainstem infarction secondary to chiropractic neck manipulation. A dissection of both vertebral arteries could be demonstrated by MR tomography. This case report should alert therapists to be aware of vertebrobasilar complications after spinal manipulations.
Article
OVERVIEW Independent Nursing Interventions Decision-Making Strategies for Choosing Nursing Interventions Resolving Ethical and Moral Dilemmas of Nursing Interventions MOVEMENT AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE INTERVENTIONS Progressive Relaxation Exercise Movement Therapy COGNITIVE INTERVENTIONS Guided Imagery Decisional Control Journal Reminiscence Contracting Meditation Sensation Information SENSORY INTERVENTIONS Therapeutic Touch Music Heat and Cold Massage Environmental Structuring: Timing Biofeedback Tactile Stimulation OTHER INTERVENTIONS Play Groups Humor Index.
Article
Study Design. A case of symptomatic hematoma of cervical ligamentum flavum. Objective. To report the first ligamentum flavum hematoma in the cervical spine and review the reported cases. Summary of Background Data. A herniated nucleus pulposis, spondylosis, epidural hematoma or abscess, neoplasm, or some pathology of the ligamentum flavum, such as hypertrophy, ossification, or calcification, are the most common causes of spinal cord and nerve root compression. A ligamentum flavum hematoma has also been reported as a cause of compression of the cauda equina and lumbar nerve roots but has never been found in the cervical spine. Methods. A 72-year-old man presented with left upper arm pain and left hemiparesis following traditional massage therapy. Admission magnetic resonance images showed a posterior oval-shaped mass that was continuous with the ligamentum flavum at C3–C4 level. Results. A C3–C4 laminectomy for decompression and resection of the lesion was performed. One year after surgery, the patient remained neurologically intact and symptom-free. Conclusions. Hematoma of the ligamentum flavum occurring in the cervical spine has never been reported previously. Repeated trivial injury on a degenerative ligamentum flavum might be the leading predisposing factor. Spine surgeons should be aware of a hematoma in the ligamentum flavum as a possible cause of spinal cord or root compression, especially in the mobile cervical and lumbar spine.
Article
Background Little is known about the incidence of adverse effects after chiropractic manipulation. Over representation of severe and under representation of less severe complications has to be assumed. Material and methods A total of 57 expert opinions from the malpractice advisory board of the North Rhine General Medical Council (Nordrheinische Ärztekammer), as well as judgments from German courts since 1949, were analyzed. Results and conclusions A total of 16 of 57 cases of chiropractic manipulation (since 1975) were attested as malpractice by expert opinion, seven of which had significant negative consequences. In nine cases, the judgments of German courts refer to manual therapy. Of these, five deal with informed consent. Observance of the “Bingen Declaration” would have avoided all cases of malpractice found by the advisory board over 29 years.