ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Comfort eating, that is eating induced by negative affect, has been a core theme of explanations for overeating and obesity. Psychobiological explanations and processes underlying comfort eating are examined, as well as its prevalence in clinical and nonclinical populations, to consider who may be susceptible, whether certain foods are comforting, and what the implications for treatment may be. Comfort eating may occur in a substantial minority, particularly in women and the obese. Human and animal theories and models of emotional or stress-induced eating show some convergence, and may incorporate genetic predispositions such as impulsivity and reward sensitivity, associated with dopamine dysregulation underlying incentive salience. Comfort eaters show vulnerability to depression, emotional dysregulation and a need to escape negative affect and rumination. During negative affect, they preferentially consume sweet, fatty, energy-dense food, which may confer protection against stress, evidenced by suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis response, although activation of the hypothalamic– pituitary–adrenal axis may itself drive appetite for these palatable foods, and the risk of weight gain is increased. Benefits to mood may be transient, but perhaps sufficient to encourage repeated attempts to prolong mood improvement or distract from negative rumination. Cognitive behavioural treatments may be useful, but reliable drug therapy awaits further pharmacogenomic developments.
Content may be subject to copyright.
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
1
Dietary Management in Polycystic Ovary
Syndrome April 2009
Mood, Emotions and Food Choice
Dr Leigh Gibson
Reader in Biopsychology
Clinical and Health Psychology
Research Centre
School of Human and Life Sciences
Whitelands College
Roehampton University
London
http://www.roehampton.ac.uk/researchcentres/chp/index.html
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
2
Why look at mood and food choice?
“Let me have men about me that are fat;
Sleek-headed men, and such as sleep o' nights:
Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look;
He thinks too much: such men are dangerous.”
Caesar in W. Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”, Act 1, Scene (ii).
.30 .39
Vitaliano et al. (2002)
(prospective data from male AD carers)
Poor diet
Low activity
Psych
Distress
Chronic
Stress CHD
.50 .33 Metabolic
Syndrome
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
3
Child Eating Behaviour Q scales predict adiposity over a
wide range in 10,359 8-11-y-olds
(Carnell & Wardle, 2008)
‘Satiety resp. + Slow eating’ ‘Enjoyment of Food’
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
4
Food choice and current internal state
Anticipation of shifting
internal state* from
current (need) to
required (ideal/sated)
state
Adaptive eating, or
successful
‘homeostasis’, depends
on accurate learning
and reliable stimuli
Maladaptive eating –
‘wrong’ choices can be
rewarding too…
*nutritional, cognitive, emotional
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
5
Tasting water
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
6
Tasting sucrose solution
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
7
Tasting lemon juice
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
8
Opioids mediate both hedonic and
motivational aspects of appetite
Berridge (2009)
Tongue protrusion
gape
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
9
Eating: pleasure from sensation and
energy.…satisfying hunger
+
Sweet and fatty energy-rich
foods are highly rewarding…
…and make us feel
better…
…so that we really want
(crave) them during hunger
or stress.
Problem:
- energy dense foods
encourage overeating, thus
obesity.
-
Only some people are
susceptible.
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
10
Why is chocolate craved and habit-forming?
Is the craving just a strong appetite created by eating
chocolate when hungry?
Can it be extinguished by eating chocolate only when full?
Craving for Chocolate
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
11
Chocolate ‘craving’ depends on eating it when hungry:
eating chocolate when full extinguishes craving
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
0
20
40
60
80
100
Craving for Chocolate
CRAVERS
a
bc
A
Hungry Full
Training State:
Hungry Full
Test State:
Hungry Full
(2 weeks)
Gibson &
Desmond
(1999)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
12
Food cravings decrease on a Very Low Calorie Diet*
and remain low on refeeding
(Martin, C.K. et al., 2006, Obesity, 14, 115-121)
*800-1000
kcal/day
- mainly liquid
supplement
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
13
Does chocolate cause a ‘sugar rush’ leading
to mood fluctuation?
From Chocolate Week 2004 (UK) website
The measure for the change in blood glucose
after eating a fixed load of carbohydrate is
known as the ‘Glycaemic Index’...
“…shortly after eating it, you feel great, consumed by a surge of
energy, followed by a low when the sugar rush runs out…”
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
14
Glycaemic Index
(vs. White Bread = 100)
Data from Foster-Powell, Holt & Brand-Miller (2002)
56
57
61
72
77
87
88
89
94.5
97
97
100
112
113.5
158
0 50 100 150 200
apple
baked beans
chocolate, milk
spaghetti
Alpen muesli
white rice
sucrose
Mars bar
banana
carrot/parsnip
Fanta drink
white bread
cornflakes
potato, boiled
potato, baked
Chocolate is a low GI food! Don’t expect a
“sugar rush”
[Healthy subjects]
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
15
Blood glucose levels in women self-
reporting hypoglycaemic symptoms vs.
matched controls:
Symptomatic levels are lower than asymptomatic or control levels,
and occur before 3 hr after eating
Simpson et al. (2006) BJN
14% <= 3 mmol/L
2% <= 3 mmol/L
2% <= 3 mmol/L
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
16
Under-eating on active days may cause “hypoglycaemic”
symptoms in healthy women
E Req E Eaten E Req E Eaten E Req E Eaten
5
6
7
8
9
10
Energy Required and Energy Eaten (MJ)
.
Adapted from Simpson et al. (2006) BJN, 95, 1127-1133
Control Group
RH - No Symptoms
RH - Symptoms
**
Simpson et al. (2006)
Fat & Protein intake (g):
RH-S < Controls
RH-S more active than RH-NS
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
17
Self-reported “Hypoglycaemics” may be more
sensitive to falling blood glucose
Thus, during falling blood glucose:
Higher glycaemic thresholds for counter-regulatory hormone release
and impairment of reaction time
Greater beta-adrenergic sensitivity
Possible explanation: failure to match increased energy expenditure
with increased intake (on active days) (Simpson et al., 2006)
Perhaps also, reduced fat and protein intake (relatively high-CHO
diet – greater insulin response?) – underreporting of sugary drinks?
(Snorgaard et al., 1991; Berlin et al.,1994)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
18
Mechanisms for stress/negative affect-
induced changes in eating and food choice
Stress-coping strategies (e.g.
eat to distract, emotional or
‘comfort’ eating – eating to
improve mood/reduce stress).
Motivational differences (e.g.
reduced concern about weight
control; helplessness, depression
and loss of appetite).
Physiological - reduced appetite
caused by physiological arousal,
or cachexia.
Practical - changes in eating
opportunities, food availability,
meal preparation, convenience.
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
19
Perceived stress-induced changes in food choice in 212
students reporting eat less, the same or more overall
Figure from Gibson (2006). Data from Oliver & Wardle (1999)
Eat much more than usual
Eat much less than usual
Eat the same as usual
38% 42%
20%
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
20
In 135 Roehampton students: similar
story for sweets and chocolate
(E. L. Gibson & K. Harris,
unpublished data)
Perceived change in eating under stress
Eat much more than usual
Eat much less than usual
Eat the same as usual
N= 38 34 63
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
Potential predictors of susceptibility
Nature of the stress
severity, emotional or physical distress, work
demands, life events …
Coping ability, stress-proneness
psychological and physiological reactivity ...
Individual differences in eating behaviour
dieting, restraint, emotional eating, gender,
food preferences, nutritional status ...
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
22
Eating attitudes: some people are
more at risk than others…
Q1. “When I feel anxious, I find myself eating.”
= ‘Emotional Eating’
Q2. “Sometimes when I start eating, I just can’t seem to
stop.”
= ‘Uncontrolled (Disinhibited) Eating’
Q3. “I consciously hold back at meals in order not to gain
weight.”
= ‘Restrained Eating’
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
23
Correlation of Eating Attitudes* to
Stress-Eating Tendency:
Emotional eating: rho(135) = 0.59***
Uncontrolled eating: rho(135) = 0.33***
Restrained eating: rho(135) = 0.07 NS
Perceived currently overweight: rho(135) =
0.23**
(E. L. Gibson & K. Harris, unpublished data)
Emotional eating is best predictor;
Restrained Eating is Not Related
*(TFEQ-R18)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
24
Kandiah et al. (2006):
Survey of stress eating habits of 272 female US college students.
62% eat more when stressed.
Stress increases mainly sweet fatty and savoury (fast) foods.
No effect of restrained eating (single-item Q).
Zellner et al. (2006):
169 US male & female UGs surveyed.
Stress increases sweet fatty foods esp. chocolate.
More commonly in ‘restrained’ eaters (Herman & Polivy Restraint
scale).
Foods chosen are those normally avoided as fattening – eaten “to
feel better”.
Other recent surveys
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
25
Effect of Food Liking on Pain Tolerance
(in 40 US female students)
12
14
16
18
20
Tolerance to Finger Pressure
(cm)
Nothing
Neutral - rice cakes
Liked - chocolate cookie
Disliked - black olives
*
Eating a much-liked (chocolate) food increases tolerance of
pain: Mediated by release of opioid neuropeptides?
Data from Mercer & Holder (1997)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
26
Smit HJ, Gaffan EA & Rogers PJ (2004)
Caffeine (19 mg) + Theobromine (250 mg) (doses found in
chocolate) and cocoa powder (11.6 g) improve
performance and mood
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
27
Key points from self-report surveys
Stress often increases consumption of
(sweet fatty) energy-dense snack foods,
even where the overall tendency is to eat the
same or less.
Stress affects people differently – eat
less/lose weight vs. eat more/gain weight.
Emotional/uncontrolled eating, but not
cognitive restraint, best predicts tendency to
overeat during stress.
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
28
Stress and food choice:
a laboratory study
Participants: non-smoking, non-obese men (n=27) and women (n=41)
from London University, volunteered to take part in a study of “the
effects of hunger on physiology, performance and mood”.
Stressed group manipulation: anticipated public speaking - 10-minute
preparatory period before lunch.
Speech scheduled for after lunch, to provide sustained stress during
eating.
Control group given non-stressful task - listening to 10-minute
passage of recorded poetry.
Lunch: ad-lib buffet of assorted cold foods from six categories: low-
and high-fat, salty, sweet and bland foods.
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
29
Stress increases intake of sweet
fatty foods in emotional eaters*
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Control Stressed
Intake of Sweet Fatty Foods
(kcal)
Low Emotional Eaters High Emotional Eaters
Oliver, Wardle & Gibson (2000)
*DEBQ-E
(not Restraint)
2.44 2.10 2.11 2.55 kcal/g
Stress x Emo. Eating, p<0.05
*
Laboratory study:
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
30
“SAD” sufferers prefer sweeter foods during the winter
(Kräuchi et al., 1999)
Obese Swedes with strong liking for sweet/fatty foods
are more anxious (stress vulnerable) (Elfhag &
Erlanson-Albertsson, 2006)
Stress-reactive female ‘binge eaters’ chose more
sweet/savoury snacks vs. fruit and veg, when
stressed (Goldfield et al., 2008)
Emotions, stress susceptibility and energy-
rich foods
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
31
Striatal dopamine receptor availability is
inversely related to BMI in obese subjects
Wang et al. (2004)
No relationship seen for
lean controls.
Cause and effect not
known.
Could be a consequence
of high frequency of
palatable food
consumption.
Binge eaters show
enhanced reward
processing to palatable
food pics (brain fMRI;
Schienle et al., 2009).
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
32
Experience of repeated stress,
repeated food restriction, and highly
palatable food (HP; choc cookies) is
necessary to see binge-like overeating in
rats (Hagan et al., 2002).
Also, chronically stressed rats show
DA output in reward pathway (n. Acc.),
but this is prevented by training to find
sweet vanilla pellets (Nanni et al., 2003),
probably via gluco-corticoid and insulin
action (Dallman et al., 2005).
Stressed rats learn to binge on chocolate cookies
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
33
Rat ‘stress eating’ is opioid dependent
…blocked by naloxone
(Boggiano et al., 2005)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
34
Carbohydrate-Rich/Low-Protein meals can raise brain 5-HT
(serotonin) synthesis by increasing tryptophan (TRP) entry
into brain sedation, calming
TRP
LNAA LNAA
TRP
Insulin
Blood Brain
TRP Hydroxylase
[5-HTP]
5-HT
FFA
Alb
BBB
Dietary “self-medication” via Serotonin?
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
35
Rat brain TRP 5-HT increased at 2 hours after
0% (pure CHO) and 6% protein meals
No Food CHO 6% Pro 12% Pro 24% Pro 40% Pro
Meal Content
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
TRP:LNAA
Ratio
Hypothal
TRP umol/g
Hypothal
5HTP ug/g/10
Fernstrom & Fernstrom (1995)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
36
Stress protective effect of CHO-rich/PRO-poor diet -- dietary
sensitivity of impaired 5-HT system exposed by stress?
(Markus et al.,1998)
In stress-prone group only, CHO-
rich breakfast and lunch prevents:
Post-stress increase in cortisol
release
Post-stress increase in
depressed mood and reduced
vigour
this diet improved cognitive
function in a stress-prone group
(Markus et al., 2000)
Also…
Stress-prone
Not Stress-prone
(measured by DPI-N)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
37
High-TRP
α
-lactalbumin increases functional 5-HT
activity in stress-prone subjects only
Stress-prone
Not Stress-prone (Markus et al., 2000)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
38
Foods as anti-stress, serotoninergic
anti-depressants?
(“Potatoes not Prozac”)
To increase serotonin function:
Carbohydrate-rich
Low in protein
Stimulate insulin release
A good example?
CHOCOLATE
But, delayed benefit (1-2 hrs)
Reinforcement of learned desire?
‘Eurochocolate 2004’, Perugia
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
39
Transient improvement in mood
on eating chocolate
Macht & Müller (2007)
After a sad film, mood is
restored only for a few
minutes by eating
chocolate.
Probably an effect of
sensory pleasure (and its
associations).
Better (complete) mood
improvement is seen in
emotional eaters
-Practice or
disposition?
(cp. increased guilt after eating in
‘chocolate addicts’ (Macdiarmid &
Hetherington, 1995)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
40
Sweet/fatty ‘comfort’ food intake increases with increasing job
strain, but only in ‘stress-prone’ men (DPI Neuroticism)
Low High
Stress Proneness
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Sweet/fatty Food Freq*
Low
Medium
High
Job Strain
*mean + SE: Choc + Cakes + Sweet biscs + Pastries + Ice cream /month.
Adjusted for BMI, Age, Education, Phys Act.
Mult. Regn. interaction, p<0.005 (transformed data; N=98)
(Gibson, Hamer, Steptoe & Wardle, 2008)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
41
High stress-reactive women ate more energy, and more
servings of sweet fatty snack food, when stressed
Epel et al. (2001)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
42
Cortisol response predicts daily snack
intake in women (Newman et al., 2007)
Daily hassles linked to
snack intake in high
reactor women only.
High reactors also
show stronger
association between
snacking and
emotional, restrained
and disinhibited eating.
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
43
Snack choice in stressed binge
eaters (Goldfield et al, 2008)
Reactivity based on
perceived stress.
High-reactive binge eaters
chose unhealthy snacks
over fruit/veg when
stressed (computer task).
Unaffected by restraint
status.
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
44
Why Cortisol and LHPA axis?
Emotions
Appetite
+ Reward
Brain energy
supply
Macronutr.
metabolism
Adiposity
Stress
Cortisol
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
45
Evidence linking stress, cortisol
and obesity
Cortisol response to stress, and to
awakening, have been linked to abdominal
adiposity
(Marin et al, 1992; Moyer et al., 1994;
Rosmond et al., 1998; Epel et al., 2000; Steptoe et
al., 2004; Gluck et al., 2004).
Poorer cardiovascular recovery from acute
stress predicted increased abdominal
adiposity over 3 years
(Steptoe & Wardle, 2005).
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
46
Hypothal
CRH
Pituitary
ACTH
Adrenal
Cortex
Cortisol
-
-
CeA
HC
Metabolic Emotional
Stressors
Hypothalamic
Pituitary
Adrenal
Axis
+
Abdominal
fat stores
Insulin
-
CHRONIC STRESS MODEL
Dallman et al. (2003)
Comfort Foods
NPY?
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
47
“The Selfish Brain”
(Peters et al., 2004, 2007)
Peters et al. (2007)
The brain’s ‘stress
response’ prioritises
energy supply to
itself
This includes the
drive to eat
Normally, a
delicate balance
Limbic HPA axis
may be key
regulator
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
48
Chronic stress upsets the balance, encouraging
overeating and abdominal obesity
Adam & Epel
(2007)
Zandian et al.
(2007)
NB: similar effect from exercise!
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
49
Peciña, Schulkin &
Berridge (2006)
CRF in N. Accumbens enhances
learned incentive salience for sugar cue
Stress may trigger ‘bingeing’ by enhancing
salience of cues to reward, via N. Acc CRF
(Overlap with
drug addiction?)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
50
Do prospective studies link stress to
obesity?
Vitaliano et al. (2002)
(prospective data from male AD carers)
.30 .39
Poor diet
Low activity
Psych
Distress
Chronic
Stress CHD
.50 .33 Metabolic
Syndrome
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
51
Epidemiology of stress and obesity
Stress due to neighbourhood disorder (in Texas)
predicts greater risk of obesity
(Burdette & Hill,
2008).
Low SES middle-aged men and women at
greater risk of short-term weight gain
(Purslow et
al, 2008).
Job stress predicts greater obesity (in London)
(Brunner, Chandola & Marmot, 2007).
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
52
Meta-analysis of prospective studies
of stress and obesity
0.0090.03218
General life
stress
0.370.00811Job stress
0.330.00912Women
0.0370.02414Men
prN Studies
(Wardle, Chida, Gibson & Steptoe, submitted)
PCOS 2009
Dr Leigh Gibson
Roehampton University
53
Summary
Comfort eating is preferentially for sweet fatty, energy
dense foods.
Such foods stimulate opioid and other anti-stress
systems.
Comfort eaters are more stress-prone, expressed
psychologically and via HPA axis activation.
Increased CRF and cortisol release might drive
selection of comfort foods.
Resultant central adiposity may restrain the HPA
axis: could this limit the stress-obesity relationship?
Could cognitive restraint impair learning of a comfort
eating stress relief habit?
... (3) By definition in this review, 'emotion' excluded moods. 'Emotion' is differentiated from 'mood' as emotion typically refers to shorter term immediate affective response, whereas mood refers to a psychological arousal state lasting from several minutes or longer (Gibson, 2006). The term 'feeling' is often used interchangeably for 'emotion' and 'mood', however, in this report 'feeling' is categorised as the conscious/core element of an emotional experience (Barrett, 2005(Barrett, , 2017. ...
Article
Traditional consumer acceptance and preference testing rarely predicts food choice behaviour accurately. Increased interest in focusing on the total consumer experience, examining the relationship between the food and the consumer, and understanding that emotional processing drives human actions has led to the development of several instruments to capture consumer response beyond hedonic liking. This review aimed to identify and provide a comprehensive overview of the tools that have been used to measure emotion, implicitly and explicitly, in relation to food in the context of food behaviour. A second aim was to highlight the relative merits of key methodologies, research gaps and, based on the review findings, provide some recommendations for selecting food-evoked emotional response measures. The studies were assessed qualitatively using a 2 level (implicit, explicit) x 3 level (cognitive, behavioural, physiological) categorisation framework to conduct an exhaustive overview of measures used in current research. A total of 193 peer-reviewed studies evaluating consumer emotional response to food [published January 1997-March 2021] were identified, classified, and reviewed. Particularly, the why, when, what, where, who, and how of measuring food evoked emotion was discussed. No one “go-to” method to measure consumer emotional responses was evident and the optimal approach remains unknown. Several studies highlighted that, in principle, combining multiple measures would provide a clearer multidimensional insight into consumer emotional responses influencing consumer food choice behaviour. However, a clear gap remains in research investigating how emotional responses contribute to formulate better sensory experience and/or predict food choice.
... The industry should also have in consideration that the sensory characteristics, and especially the taste, is a particularly important criteria of acceptance of pulse-based products. Generally, when consumers are exposed to a new food product, they rarely make an effort to get information about the product or its characteristics , because people are constant in their food choices, they hold a set of expectations and beliefs about the product that would guide their behavior (Gibson, 2006). As a consequence, all the actors in the supply chain must improve their communication with and toward consumers, regarding traditional and new pulse-based products. ...
Thesis
L’objectif de cette thèse était de comprendre quels sont les barrières à la consommation de légumes secs chez les consommateurs français non végétariens, en combinant des méthodes directes, indirectes et implicites.Après avoir montré que les représentations sociales des consommateurs sont très différentes de celles des professionnels de la filière, nous avons exploré les représentations mentales, croyances et connaissances des légumes secs chez les consommateurs. Ceci a fait apparaitre que même si les participants de nos études avaient des connaissances sur les légumes secs, ils les choisissaient peu. De plus, ils associaient plutôt les legumes secs avec la viande, qui occupe pour eux la place centrale du repas. La difficulté de préparation des légumes secs semble être un frein majeur à leur consommation. Leur niveau de transformation est un autre facteur qui influence fortement les représentations mentales qu’en ont les consommateurs.Une étude en supermarché virtuel a montré que l’attention visuelle envers les légumes secs est différente de celle accordée à d’autres produits, et qu’elle est influencée par le rayon dans lequel ils sont présentés. Nous avons évalué l’influence de stratégies pour augmenter les choix des légumes secs dans un environnement de supermarché virtuel, par le moyen de « nudges » et de contextes évoqués qui soulignaient des motivations de choix différentes. Nous avons mis en évidence un choix plus élevé de légumes secs dans certains de ces contextes (ex: une motivation pour l’environnement tend à augmenter les choix de légumes secs). En revanche, la stratégie utilisant des « nudges » seuls n’a pas augmenté le choix des légumes secs. Mais, lorsqu’on combine ces deux stratégies, des modifications de choix chez certains participants sont observées.Une dernière étude a permis de comparer les représentations sociales des légumes secs pour les consommateurs français et espagnols dans un contexte cross-culturel, et a montré des éléments partagés dans les représentations de ces deux populations, et des éléments spécifiques à chaque culture et au niveau d’éducation des participants.L’ensemble de ces résultats nous a permis de proposer un certain nombre de recommandations destinées à l’industrie, aux autorités nationales et au monde de la recherche, pour contribuer à l’augmentation de la consommation de légumes secs en France.
... Emotions and eating are both inherent and recurring part of our daily lives. Research has also demonstrated that they interact with each other in multiple ways: emotional states influence the quantity and quality of foods eaten, and food intake has affective consequences that may influence subsequent food choices (1) . Various physiological, psychological and social processes are likely to be involved in this interaction. ...
Article
Stress and other negative emotions, such as depression and anxiety, can lead to both decreased and increased food intake. The term ‘emotional eating’ has been widely used to refer to the latter response: a tendency to eat in response to negative emotions with the chosen foods being primarily energy-dense and palatable ones. Emotional eating can be caused by various mechanisms, such as using eating to cope with negative emotions or confusing internal states of hunger and satiety with physiological changes related to emotions. An increasing number of prospective studies have shown that emotional eating predicts subsequent weight gain in adults. This review discusses particularly three lines of research on emotional eating and obesity in adults. First, studies implying that emotional eating may be one behavioural mechanism linking depression and development of obesity. Secondly, studies highlighting the relevance of night sleep duration by showing that adults with a combination of shorter sleep and higher emotional eating may be especially vulnerable to weight gain. Thirdly, an emerging literature suggesting that genes may influence body weight partly through emotional eating and other eating behaviour dimensions. The review concludes by discussing what kind of implications these three avenues of research offer for obesity prevention and treatment interventions.
... A number of studies have postulated a bidirectional effect between emotions and eating behavior (see Gibson, 2006;Macht, 2008): emotions may alter the foods that people choose, and the foods that people eat influence their emotions. He et al (2016) found that facial expressions were stronger to disliked foods than to liked foods and were already detected at the first visual It is known in the marketing literature that some companies try to employ shapes that are both emotionally appealing and compatible with their brand's image. ...
... He devotes a section of his paper to the respective influences of carbohydrate and proteins on the tryptophan ratio in the brain and the effects of such changes on mood and arousal. Thus, carbohydrates will make people more calm and sleepy than protein-rich meals (Benton, 2002), but the extent of these effects depends also on individual differences in susceptibility to nutritional effects on mood, emotion and aspects of brain function (Gibson, 2006b;Gibson & Green, 2002). ...
... It is probably related to control of nitrogen metabolism, gluconeogenesis and proteolysis (i.e., catabolism of protein), and is not seen after very low protein meals . In fact, the lower the amount of protein consumed in the 5 days prior to the protein-rich lunch, the greater the rise in cortisol (Gibson, 2006). However, cortisol has profound effects on neuronal function in limbic areas of the brain (De Kloet et al., 1993), linked to changes in mood state and memory (Lupien et al., 1999). ...
Chapter
Learning underlies the development and regulation of habitual eating, including our likes and dislikes, choosing foods most appropriate to our current motivational state, and controlling how much is eaten. In young children, mere exposure to the flavor of a food increases acceptance of that food. Similarly, exposure to flavors in amniotic fluid and breast milk might link maternal dietary choice with preference development in children. Children's preferences are strongly correlated with the energy density of foods because of the reinforcing effects of energy eaten when hungry, that is, flavor consequence learning. Carbohydrate, fat, and protein have all proved effective in reinforcing flavor preferences. Flavors associated with higher energy consumption are preferred when hungry, but conversely less liked when full than lower energy-paired flavors, and they suppress subsequent intake. Sensitivity to post-ingestive energy differences may weaken with age and externalization of eating control. Frequent eating of high fat energy-dense foods may impair neural inhibition of learned appetite, creating a vicious circle leading to obesity. Flavor-flavor learning occurs when a neutral flavor is eaten together with a flavor that already has strong positive or, more robustly, aversive properties. This could form a shortcut for transferring important information from one sensory property to another. The necessity for explicit awareness of flavor-consequence or flavor-flavor associations for learned control of eating is discussed. This is important because it has implications as to who should be held accountable for eating behavior, and so for public health strategies to control obesity and dietary-related disease.
... He devotes a section of his paper to the respective influences of carbohydrate and proteins on the tryptophan ratio in the brain and the effects of such changes on mood and arousal. Thus, carbohydrates will make people more calm and sleepy than protein-rich meals (Benton, 2002), but the extent of these effects depends also on individual differences in susceptibility to nutritional effects on mood, emotion and aspects of brain function (Gibson, 2006b;Gibson & Green, 2002). ...
Article
Full-text available
Consumer ethnocentrism (CET), healthiness perception and health consciousness have been extensively researched in regard to consumer food choices. Literature on domestic food choices provides evidence that CET positively affects consumer preferences toward domestic food. However, the effect of health consciousness on domestic food choices has not yet received a ention. Our online study (N=227, convenience sample from Lithuanian population) closes this gap by showing that health consciousness is an important individual trait in domestic food choices beyond consumer ethnocentrism and represents the first study to analyze CET in light of food healthiness perception. All constructs were measured using established self-report scales. Empirical results obtained through structural equation modelling show that (1) health consciousness increases healthiness perception and willingness to buy domestic food. Moreover, (2) health consciousness is an important individual trait in domestic food choices beyond CET; (3) healthiness perception of domestic food has an impact on consumer purchase decisions; (4) CET has a positive impact on domestic food healthiness perception. The study provides managerial implications for domestic and foreign producers.
Article
Full-text available
dness, and depression or to reward themselves in the case of positive feelings such as happiness and success. When consumed, these foods and drinks are also described as causing goodness in the mood of the person with nostalgic references, and they are sometimes referred to as “mother’s food”. According to the studies in the literature, it is known that consumption of comfort food differs across gender, age, and culture. It was suggested that while comfort foods for women are generally sweet foods such as sugar, chocolate and ice cream, comfort foods for men are protein-based foods such as meat and meat products and carbohydrate foods such as pasta and pizza. It was also found out that while the younger individuals preferred snacks such as chips, hamburgers, and chocolates as comfort foods, the elderly group preferred more pot dishes, soups, and fruits and vegetables as comfort foods. Additionally, it was reported that individuals sometimes consumed local food as comfort foods. Although there are many studies about comfort food concept in the world, not many studies were accessed in Turkey. Therefore, studies on comfort food were examined and this topic was discussed from a conceptual point of view. Knowledge of how negative and positive psychological states affect eating behavior and food selection is expected to help specialists in food processing and nutrition who are interested in developing healthy new products demanded by the consumers. It can be argued that this research is to prepare a common ground for the studies to be conducted about comfort foods.
Chapter
The complexity of consumer perception of food products is still underestimated. Simply determining a product's averaged pleasantness in a single test may not be the best way to predict the product's future in the market. Not only is there a multitude of aspects and their mutual interactions that come into play, but the relationship between the consumer and the product also changes over repeated exposure, and these changes often determine the duration of the product's life cycle in the market. Predicting these changes over repeated exposure is probably more important than the momentary appreciation of the product on which most market research is based nowadays. The role of "collative properties," like perceived complexity, in the development of liking over exposure is discussed, and methods for predicting these changes and for the introduction of the product into the market are described. The effects of these methods on the possibility of producing more durable products are indicated.
Article
Full-text available
Carbohydrate ingestion may reduce arousal, although some studies have failed to find this effect. Arousal has generally been measured by mood scales. Reductions in rated arousal have sometimes been interpreted as indicating direct effects of serotonin on behaviour. It is suggested that the theory of rated mood in common use is deficient and an enhanced theory incorporating cognitive factors is proposed. According to this theory, the effects of carbohydrate on behaviour will be mediated by psychological factors. At minimum, the prior mood state of the subject, the habitual diet, expectations about the effects of food ingestion and the meaning of the situation where carbohydrates are ingested will also influence mood and behaviour. Review of the literature since 1983 shows thai carbohydrate most often reduces arousal when it is given about lunchtime and subjects are not blind to what they are eating. Furthermore, effects usually occur only on some of several rating scales pertaining to arousal, at inconsistent times after eating. It is proposed that cognitive beliefs about the sedative effects of high carbohydrate food incline subjects to rate more highly the reduced arousal caused by the post-lunch circadian dip. Carbohydrate may affect serotonin levels, but this is not the main explanation for the effects reported.
Article
Insulin resistance is followed by several prevalent diseases. The most common condition with insulin resistance is obesity, particularly when localized to abdominal, visceral regions. A summary of recent reviews on the pathogenesis of systemic insulin resistance indicates that major factors are decreased insulin effects on muscular glycogen synthase or preceding steps in the insulin signalling cascade, on endogenous glucose production and on circulating free fatty acids (FFA) from adipose tissue lipolysis. Contributions of morphologic changes in muscle and other factors are considered more uncertain. Newly developed methodology has made it possible to determine more precisely the neuroendocrine abnormalities in abdominal obesity including increased cortisol and adrenal androgen secretions. This is probably due to a hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, amplified by inefficient feedback inhibition by central glucocorticoid receptors, associated with molecular genetic defects. Secondly, secretion of gender-specific sex steroid hormones becomes inhibited and the sympathetic nervous system activated. At this stage the HPA axis shows signs of a 'burned-out' condition, and cortisol secretion is no longer elevated. Cortisol counteracts the insulin activation of glycogen synthase in muscle, the insulin inhibition of hepatic glucose production and the insulin inhibition of lipolysis in adipose tissue, leading to the well-established systemic insulin resistance caused by excess cortisol. This is exaggerated by increased free fatty acid mobilization, particularly with a concomitant elevation of the activity of the sympathetic nervous system. Furthermore, capillarization and fiber composition in muscle are changed. These are the identical perturbations responsible for insulin resistance in recent reviews. The diminished sex steroid secretion in abdominal obesity has the same consequences. It is thus clear that insulin resistance may be induced by neuroendocrine abnormalities, such as those seen in abdominal obesity. These endocrine perturbations also direct excess fat to visceral fat depots via mechanisms that are largely known, indicating why abdominal obesity is commonly associated with insulin resistance. This possible background to the most prevalent condition of insulin resistance has been revealed by development of methodology that allows sufficiently sensitive measurements of HPA axis activity. These findings demonstrate the power of neuroendocrine regulations for somatic health. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article
Mood and emotions are intrinsically involved with eating. The question is in what ways do these normal emotional relations with food contribute to, or shed light on, the development of abnormal relations with food that eventually become clinical eating disorders (EDs). This chapter discusses basic mechanisms, findings, and models that help our understanding of the interactions between eating and emotions, in both clinical and nonclinical populations. The finding that comorbidity with mood and anxiety disorders is the norm among patients with EDs suggests that EDs may not necessarily be restricted to domains of eating behavior and body image but may also be associated with significant difficulties in affective functioning. This chapter reviews the evidence relating to the notion that EDs are disturbances of mood regulation, in which regulatory strategies specifically related to eating and the body are used to diminish negative affect associated with food, body image, or stress.
Article
Many persons with eating disorders (EDs) receive pharmacotherapy, but pharmacotherapy research for EDs has lagged behind that for other major mental disorders. In this chapter, we first provide a brief rationale for using medications in the treatment of EDs. We then review the data supporting the effectiveness of specific medications or medication classes in treating patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder (BED), and other potentially important EDs, such as night eating syndrome (NES) and sleep-related eating disorder (SRED). We conclude by summarizing these data and suggesting future areas for research in the pharmacotherapy of EDs.
Article
This article proposes that binge eating is motivated by a desire to escape from self-awareness. Binge eaters suffer from high standards and expectations, especially an acute sensitivity to the difficult (perceived) demands of others. When they fall short of these standards, they develop an aversive pattern of high self-awareness, characterized by unflattering views of self and concern over how they are perceived by others. These aversive self-perceptions are accompanied by emotional distress, which often includes anxiety and depression. To escape from this unpleasant state, binge eaters attempt the cognitive response of narrowing attention to the immediate stimulus environment and avoiding broadly meaningful thought. This narrowing of attention disengages normal inhibitions against eating and fosters an uncritical acceptance of irrational beliefs and thoughts. The escape model is capable of integrating much of the available evidence about binge eating.
Article
Aetiological explanations for overeating and obesity often invoke ‘emotional’ or ‘comfort’ eating: an overlapping risk factor is ‘disinhibited eating’, implying eating without nutritional need, and sensitivity to food cues. This is illustrated by a recent study (Wilkinson, Rowe, Bishop, & Brunstrom, 2010)[[Au: The reference “Wilkinson, Rowe, Bishop, and Brunstrom (2010)” is cited in the text but not listed. Please check.]] showing that a positive relationship between attachment anxiety and BMI was mediated by disinhibited eating. This was interpreted as reflecting external regulation of emotions by overeating. However, this was not directly tested, as the measure of disinhibited eating (Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, TFEQ) conflated both external and emotional influences on eating. To address this, we used the most recent version of this instrument (TFEQ-R18v2), which separates disinhibited or ‘uncontrolled’ eating from emotional eating items, to test directly the relative associations between attachment anxiety, uncontrolled and emotional eating. Seventy-seven participants (females n = 51, BMI range from 17.6 to 29.3 kg m−2) completed a measure of anxious attachment (ECR, Brennan et al., 1998)[[Au: The reference “Brennan et al. (1998)” is cited in the text but not listed. Please check.]] and a measure of uncontrolled eating and emotional eating (TFEQ-R18v2, Cappelleri et al., 2009)[[Au: The reference “Cappelleri et al. (2009)” is cited in the text but not listed. Please check.]]. Height and weight were measured to calculate BMI. Anxious attachment significantly predicted uncontrolled eating (β = 0.202), after controlling for age, gender and emotional eating. In contrast, anxious attachment did not predict emotional eating (β = 0.039) after controlling for age, gender and uncontrolled eating. No significant correlations were found between BMI and either uncontrolled eating, emotional eating or anxious attachment. These findings support the link between anxious attachment and disinhibited eating but suggest that interpreting this in terms of external affect regulation maybe premature.
Article
The commonly-held view that stress can elicit eating, and that this eating is an attempt by the organism to reduce anxiety, is critically examined. It is shown that a variety of factors, other than food-deprivation and palatability, can elicit eating in animals and man. Many of these elicitors do not have obvious aversive correlates. It is argued, by analogy with avoidance learning, that the eating cannot produce a reduction in the aversiveness of the eliciting stimulus, since the eating behaviour would not be strengthened and maintained. It is suggested that the eliciting stimuli simply activate the organism, making it more responsive to external, food-related stimuli, which direct behaviour towards eating. These stimuli elicit metabolic responses associated with eating, which serve to increase activation, and strengthen the eating response further.