ArticlePDF Available

The Auditory Sense in Tortoises, using Hermann’s Tortoise, Testudo hermanni (Gmelin, 1789), as an Example

Authors:
  • Village des Tortues - TORTUPOLE FRANCE

Abstract and Figures

The turtle as all animals is equipped with sense organs. But its feature is not to have external ear, specificity shared with other animals such as birds or cetaceans. The result is the following question: does the turtle hear? The tympanic hearing is a novelty in the evolution that has emerged independently in at least five major groups of tetrapods, anurans, lepidosauriens, archosaurs, mammals and chelonians. This has led to a change in auditory information process as for high frequencies than for the directional sensitivity (Christensen-Dalsgaard et Carr, 2008). A simple approach was tested on the Hermann tortoise at The Village des Tortues in 2001. Remember that most of the studies cited and performed in this document are done on animals previously decerebrated… The goal of our approach is to specify the audio frequency range heard by the Hermann tortoise, noninvasively.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Anatomy
Reptiles have an inner and a middle ear.
Crocodiles are the only ones with rudiments
         
protect the tympanum during underwater
stays. Snakes, on the other hand, have very
simple ears that leave them practically deaf
to all sounds but those at very low frequen-
cies. They perceive mainly vibrations in the
ground by means of the skull bones and,
to a lesser extent, the rest of the skeleton
( 1992).
Chelonians lack an outer ear, and their
hearing apparatus shows on the outside only
as an enlarged, round membrane. In Testudo
hermanni, this tympanum is approximately
0.25 mm in thickness. Behind it lies the
middle ear that leads over to the inner ear
and contains various structures that serve the
perception of vibrations.
The middle ear consists for the largest part
of the tympanic cavity that is connected to
the oral cavity via the Eustachian tube (see
Figs. 1 & 2). It is closed off to the outside
by the membranous tympanum. Vibrations of
this membrane are transferred to the inner ear
via a bony rod, called the columella.
A close look at the inner ear reveals that the
skinny and bony labyrinth is connected to the
middle ear on the one, and to the skull cavity
on the other hand. The inner ear is separated
from the middle ear by a large, pericapsular

fairly large in some species and then will
establish contact with the endolymphatic
cavity ( 1996).
Stéphane Gagno
The Auditory Sense in Tortoises, using Hermann’s Tor-
toise, Testudo hermanni (Gmelin, 1789), as an Example
Fig. 1.
Anatomy of a turtle ear
(Emys orbicularis).
A: endolymphatic cavity,
B: utriculus, C: sacculus,
D: tympanic cavity,
E: columella, F: Eusta-
chian tube, G: pericap-
sular sinus, H: cisterna
perilymphatica, I: ductus
perilymphaticus, J: saccus
perilymphaticus, K: brain,
IX and X: cerebral nerves
(after  1970);
terminology partly after
 (1983).
4 RADIATA 22 (2), 2013
The Auditory Sense in Tortoises
Attributes of sound waves
If sound is to be produced, there needs
to be a vibrating body whose vibrations can
bring the adjacent air molecules out of their
balanced state. This will create an alternating
series of zones of increased pressure in which
the air molecules are closer together, and
zones with reduced pressure in which the air
molecules are farther apart. This succession
facilitates the spatial spread of sound. It also
implies that sound cannot be generated or
dispersed in a vacuum. Sound is illustrated
as a sinus-shaped curve.
Sound waves have two major attributes:
- Amplitude, which is the volume, quanti-

- Frequency (f), which is the number of
vibrations of air molecules per second, quan-
 
sometimes substituted with the number of peri-
ods per second (p.p.s.), with a period (T) being
the duration of one complete vibration.
f = 1/T
The higher the frequency, the higher
a sound is perceived, and the lower the
frequency, the lower a sound is perceived.
Sound travels at a speed of 340 metres per
second in air.
Fig. 2. Dissection specimen of the upper head region of a tortoise, from below on the left, with
the openings of the Eustachian tube pointed out, and on the right, with a catheter channelled

Fig. 4. Visualisation of a low and a high
sound.
Fig. 3. Attributes of sound waves.
RADIATA 22 (2), 2013 5
low sound high sound
Eustachian tube
period
amplitude/
sound intensity
Stéphane GaGno
Previous studies in chelonians
 (1978, 1980, 1983, 1986)
described the responsiveness to vibrational
cues that impacted directly on the cara-
pace. These studies were conducted using
specimens of Testudo graeca and Testudo
hermanni from which the brain had been
removed. Nervous impulses caused by sound
from a loudspeaker that was in direct contact
with the carapace were then measured with
an electrode implanted in the spinal marrow.
Various frequencies were tested, and it sho-
wed that the range of perception contained
gaps. On the bottom line, the experiments
demonstrated that the carapace of a tortoise
had to be equipped with sensory receptors
that were able to perceive vibrations and that
these sensory receptors had to be situated
close under the surface. Differences were
found in the intensity of responsiveness,
depending on where exactly the cue was
applied. Frequencies of 150 Hz or more did
not trigger nervous impulses in the spinal
marrow at all; the strongest responses were
noted in the range between 80 and 100 Hz.
For  this was sufficient evidence
that a tortoise that was fully retracted into
its shell would mainly perceive vibrations in
the ground and much less airborne sound.
 (1981, 1982, 1983) conducted
labyrinth experiments with live specimens of
Trachemys scripta and Terrapene carolina,
in which the exit of a maze was marked
with a source of sound waves. His results
suggest that turtles would complement their
acoustic perception with cues perceived
and transferred via the bones of their shell
and were thus able to both perceive sound
waves from their immediate environment
and locate their point of origin. This type
of sensing is of major advantage for the
turtles when they have to retract the head
with its actual hearing organs within the
shell to protect it against attacks from
predators. To support this conclusion, -
, like  in his experiments,
applied vibrations right onto the shell and
measured the nervous impulses on the brain
stem. He was convinced that the transfer
of sound waves via the bones created the
actual perception of sound.
In 1983, a team headed by 
conducted similar experiments with marine
turtles (Caretta caretta and Lepidochelys
kempii) and found that the surface of skull
and shell had to contain the sensory re-
ceptors required to perceive sound waves.
These turtles are thus able to perceive the
low frequencies of the beach on which they
hatch, memorise their pattern, and find their
way back to exactly this beach for nesting
in later years. Anthropogenic activities on
and in the sea produce a lot of noise and
investigations revealed that this underwater
noise falls for the largest part within a range
of 80 to 110 dB. The top values of these
disturbances thus meet with the maximum
sound sensitivity of marine turtles. It is
therefore incontestable that a noisy environ-
ment cannot but affect their behaviour and
represents a particular type of environmental
pollution ( et al. 2005).
There are a great number of studies on the
auditory nerves of chelonians (
  1978, 1980,  
 1981a, 1981b,  et al. 1984,
   1986, 
1988,    2003, 
et al. 2003,  et
al. 2012).  (1980)
researched the electrical impulses in the
nerves and the sensory cells of the cochlea
in Trachemys scripta elegans. Cues with a
frequency range of 70 to 670 Hz produced
nervous impulses, and the ear of these turtles
was most sensitive to sound wave pressures
between about 30 and 40 dB. Within this
frequency range, with top values between
400 and 500 Hz, 
et al. (2012) also measured the optimal
vibration of the tympanum of Trachemys
scripta elegans. As a consequence, the latter
6 RADIATA 22 (2), 2013
The Auditory Sense in Tortoises
team of researchers hypothesised that the
resonance of the air-filled middle ear could
also play a role in underwater hearing.
Using a similar methodology, et
al. (1969) managed to specify the maximum
sensitivity of Chelonia mydas as 300 to 400
Hz. While the upper limit of hearing was
2,000 Hz, frequencies up to about 1,000 Hz
could be perceived reliably. Outfitted with
ciliaries, the auditory sensory cells play
an important role in the amplification of a
signal and the differentiation of perceivable
frequencies. Response times are less than
one millisecond ( et al. 2001).
 et al. (2004) described in detail the
molecular processes within the auditory
sensory cells. The mechano-electrical si-
gnal converters have pores through which
certain molecules transport information.
These porous canals have a diameter of a
mere 12.5 Å (1 Ångström = 10-10 metres)
over a length of 31 Å.
 et al. (2007) described the embryo-
nic ontogenesis of the relevant areas of the
hearing organs in Pelodiscus sinensis.
1981) elaborated on
electro-physiological measurements taken
in Chrysemys picta and Trachemys scripta,
which revealed distinct impulses in the vesti-
bular window, semicircular duct and canal,
and the outer wall of the tympanic cavity
at soft volume to a maximum frequency of
500 Hz. Above this limit, impulses could
be recorded to about 3,000 Hz, but this was
a result of increased sound wave pressure,
or in other words, “over-stimulation”, with
a risk of damage to the hearing system.
The two researchers tapped the electrical
impulses directly in the hearing centre of
the brain in four species of chelonians.
It demonstrated that Testudo graeca was
the least sensitive of the species studied.
The scientists measured responses in this
species from 40 dB in a frequency range
from about 100 to 200 Hz. For Mauremys
caspica, a perceivable frequency range
from 300 to 600 Hz was established, with
these pond turtles being most sensitive to
300 Hz. In contrast, Emys orbicularis and
Testudo horsfieldii were significantly more
sensitive to sound, showing responses from
a volume of only 30 dB and within a wider
frequency range, so that electrical impulses
were still recorded at as little as 1.5 KHz
and as much as 3.5 KHz.
The literature available on the subject of
hearing capabilities in chelonians shows that
these animals almost exclusively perceive
deep sounds. The studies mentioned were
for the largest part dedicated to researching
electro-physiological signal transfer from
the sensory organs and via the nerves. What
remains to be investigated is how these
signals are fed into, and processed by, the
central nervous system and which responses
they trigger. In other words, it needs to be
studied whether and how chelonians exhibit
recognisable responses to sounds.
As early as in 1982,  had expo-
sed eight species of chelonians representing
three families (Emydidae, Testudinidae
and Chelydridae) to sounds up to 100 dB
in amplitude. If the sounds were emitted
via a loudspeaker and airborne, there was
no behavioural response by the turtles. It
was only when the turtles were impacted
directly by sounds – on the dorsal shell
– that they would respond with movements
of the head.
The present study investigates the ef-
fects exclusively airborne sound waves
may have on Testudo hermanni hermanni.
The results were evaluated on the basis of
directly observed responses in the studied
specimens.
Material and methods

Tortoise each was placed in a soundproof
environment, i.e., a completely closed
container that was thickly insulated with
soundproofing material all around. The walls
RADIATA 22 (2), 2013 7
Stéphane GaGno
     
coated with a layer of cork. A small window
with one-way glass facilitated observing
the tortoise without its being able to see
the observer. The container was placed on
rubber feet so that the tortoise was fully
shielded from any exterior vibrations. A 40
W loudspeaker was mounted in the upper
portion of the tank in a manner so that it
could not transfer bodily vibrations to the
container. It was connected to a frequency
generator for sinus waves from 0 to 100
kHz. Amplitudes (volume) within the tank
were measured with a sonometer relative to
the frequency applied (Fig. 5). Temperatures
within the experimental setup ranged from
25 to 30°C. All experiments were conducted
at the facilities of the Turtle Village (SO-

The frequency generator was activated
only after the tortoise had calmed down and
assumed a relaxed posture by resting the
head on the ground. Starting from a certain
frequency, the frequency of the sound was
gradually changed. It was either raised to
a maximum of 100 kHz or lowered to a
minimum of 0 Hz (see Fig. 6). Whether
a certain frequency was perceived by the
tortoise was evaluated by its behaviour
and assumed to be affirmative if it lifted
the head, for example. This frequency was
then recorded. The experiment was succes-
sively duplicated with ten adult tortoises,
with each being exposed to a different
starting frequency. The recorded results
were summarily plotted in a graphic and
represent the perceived frequency range of
the tested tortoises.
Healthy adult tortoises were randomly
taken from the pens of the Turtle Village SO-
-
tric data are summarised in Table 1.
Fig. 6:
Experimental
setup.
Fig. 5.
Sound pressure
level of the ex-
perimental setup
as a function of
the generated
frequency (in
decibels).
8 RADIATA 22 (2), 2013
89142938  109  700720 1026
 81738540   9950 11000
1890019411 2173222050 23210
64 687280
70
8286 908088
6080
901008010390
80
72
hertz (Hz)
decibels (Db)
The Auditory Sense in Tortoises
Results and Discussion
After having adjusted to the environment of
the experimental setup, the tortoises responded
with different behavioural expressions to the
sounds produced:
- Startled waking up, followed either by
retracting the extremities or extending the
neck. This was the most commonly observed
response.
- Distinct pumping motions with the front
legs in order to increase breathing activity.
- Yawning, which almost made an impres-
sion of embarrassment over the disturbance.
The frequencies at which every one of the
  
responses were plotted along a graphic axis.
Figure 7 illustrates this using tortoise No. 1 as
an example. Every red dot marks a frequency
at which this specimen displayed a response.
The directions of the arrows indicate whether
this response was triggered while the frequen-
cy was rising or falling.
Now the responses of all tortoises were
pooled in a common graphic (Fig. 8). Each
response is here marked with a blue rectan-
gle. The frequency range perceivable to the
tortoises lies between 10 and 182 Hz. It is
thus much narrower than that of humans,
which ranges from about 20 to 20,000 Hz.
A part of the frequency range perceived
by these tortoises lies within the range of
infrasound (between 10 and 20 Hz), which
cannot be heard directly by the human ear.
It is evident that the tortoises can only hear
deep sounds.
The tortoises in our study responded with
lifting their heads to frequencies that were
different from those in the study by 
Tortoise No. Sex Length (mm) Width (mm) Height (mm) Weight (g)
1110 85 59 236
2141 110 74 550
3 F 171 131 85 990
4 F 200 148 95 1,523
5 F 185 134 90 1,200
6 F 158 127 88 726
7 F 170 125 89 1,014
8 F 155 112 88 790
9 F 151 114 74 660
10 F160 117 82 786
Table 1: Data on the tortoises used in the experiment
Fig. 7. Responses of tortoise No. 1 to frequencies.
Fig. 8. Summary of the experimental frequencies that triggered a response in the tested tortoises.
RADIATA 22 (2), 2013 9
frequency (Hz)
Stéphane GaGno
(1982). He had conducted his experiments
with frequencies above 250 Hz, which were
clearly above the maximum perception ca-

results demonstrate that these tortoises can
hear sounds only within a fairly limited range.
They are adapted to hearing deep sounds, even
within the infrasound range that the human
ear cannot perceive any more. Sounds as deep
as these are perceived via an adapted bone
structure that contains special sensors for the

capable of hearing high and even very high
frequencies: Dogs to about 35 KHz, cats to
about 25 KHz, and bats even to 80 KHz. This is
in contrast to other, mainly very large animals
such as the elephant, which are capable of
exploiting even infrasound for communicating
Fig. 9.
Frequency
spectra of various
musical instru-
ments.
10 RADIATA 22 (2), 2013
The Auditory Sense in Tortoises
over distances of several kilometres. It may
be presumed that by perceiving low-frequency
ground vibrations, tortoises are able to detect
the approach of a potential predator already
from a great distance.
Tortoise keepers have again and again been
reporting that their tortoises came running
from their outdoor enclosures when they
played the piano. Studying the overview of
frequencies in Fig. 9 shows that the piano is
one of the musical instruments that can also
produce very deep sounds. The above results
also explain why tortoises will respond more
readily to the deeper male voice than to the
higher voice of a woman.
Studies on the hearing capabilities of tor-
toises have demonstrated that they can mainly
perceive deep sounds. Their range of hearing
is a direct consequence of the presence of

apparatus. For example, ciliary-bearing cells
are responsible for distinguishing different
sounds according to their sensitivity. The
structure of the visible tympanum likewise
limits the transfer of sound waves. Viewed
from a purely mechanical perspective, it is
a specialised, round membrane that is sur-
rounded by inelastic bones. The vibrational
amplitude of membranes with the same surface
area is smallest in membranes with a round
shape. This vibrational amplitude is calculated
after the following formula:
For a round membrane with a solid margin

depend on a variety of factors, i.e. density

of elasticity after  (E), and the strain
-
rameters are about equal for all chelonian spe-
cies. There are, however, two more variables
that also play a role here, i.e., the thickness
of the tympanum (h) and its diameter (a),
which are different in the various species
of chelonians. These two parameters could
explain the deviant measuring results in the
study by  (1981), because
the tympani of Testudo horseldii and Emys
orbicularis are about four times as thick as that
of Testudo graeca. This parameter functions
as a numerator in the formula given above so
that it is entirely plausible that these species

frequencies and are more sensitive to sound
than the Spur-thighed Tortoise.
It should be clear by now that chelonians
have by all means a well-developed sense
of hearing that is complemented by sensory
receptors in their shell that are sensitised to a
wide range of the frequencies a tortoise would
respond to. While this probably enables a tor-
toise to detect an approaching predator early,
the results of other studies render it likely that
the auditory capabilities also plays a role in
reproduction. The publication by  et
al. (2005a) suggests that the sounds emitted
by male Testudo hermanni during copula-
tion can be evaluated by females and may

These sounds may even serve the purpose
of inter-male communication (to keep rivals
and intruders away). With these sounds be-

      
male (1995, quoted in  et
al. 2005a). The courtship and mating gestures,
but also the mating sounds of male Testudo
hermanni, Testudo marginata and Testudo
graeca may be indicative of the physiological
 et al. 2003, 
et al. 2005b,  et al. 2011).
The mechanism of the production of mating
sounds of Testudo spp. were described by
 et al. (2004), and in some tortoise
species, it was even demonstrated that they
truly communicate via sounds ( 2007).
In the case of Gopherus polyphemus, “con-
RADIATA 22 (2), 2013 11
Stéphane GaGno
versations” of up to ten minutes in duration
were documented between residential caves
that were in some instances several kilome-
tres apart, with the produced and perceived
frequency lying between 3 and 40 Hz in this
species ( 2008). 
et al. (2013) recorded the sounds emitted by
adult and newly hatched Podocnemis expansa
during various situations in and outside of the
water. This team of researchers even stated
that there was an acoustic communication
system in place between adult and hatchling
turtles that enabled the females to “call” the
juveniles together prior to starting off on one
of the long migrations typical of this spe-
cies. Only once assembled would adults and
juveniles set out on their journey together.
In Chelodina oblonga, evidence for acoustic
underwater communication was found (
2005,  et al. 2009). Their repertoire
of sounds proved to be very complex, with
most sounds having frequencies below 1 KHz
while ranging from 100 Hz to 3.5 KHz. When
reviewing the literature it is evident that the
auditory senses of chelonians vary consider-
ably, according to species. We must be aware
that the ability of the different chelonians to
hear and to emit sounds is not limited to the

auditory sense enables the animal to perceive
signals from their environment and react
accordingly, for example to the presence of
predators. Even though chelonians have no
externally visible ears, their sense of hearing
plays a major role in their day-to-day life, is
crucial for their survival, and acts as a trigger
for some of their responses.
Acknowledgements
I am particularly grateful to Dr.  -
 for the critical review of my manuscript,

and appreciation of this work. I furthermore
thank   and  
for their assistance with taking measurements
in the course of their extracurricular internship.
I am indebted to   for her translating
the original French manuscript into German and
the extraordinary courteousness she afforded

go to  for his translation into
English and to  for accepting
my manuscript for the Radiata.
References
, R. E. (2007): Turtles and tortoises
are communicating with low frequency sound.

The natural his-
tory and management of the Gopher tortoise
Gopherus polyphemus (

    
(1984): Synaptic hyperpolarization and
inhibition of turtle cochlear hair cells. – J.
356 (1): 525-550, jp.physoc.
org/content/356/1/525.short (Download:
01.02.2013).
  (1992): Les maladies des
reptiles. – 2nd    
du point vétérinaire), 320 pp.

(2008): Evolution of a sensory novelty: tym-
panic ears and the associated neural process-
ing. – Brain Res. Bull., New York, 75 (2-4):
365-370, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/


       
       
     (2012): Specializa-
tion for underwater hearing by the tympanic
middle ear of the turtle, Trachemys scripta
elegans        279
(1739): 2816-2824, www.marinebioacoustics.

2012.pdf (Download: 01.02.2013).
12 RADIATA 22 (2), 2013
The Auditory Sense in Tortoises
 (1980):
The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve
        
     306 (1): 79-
125, jp.physoc.org/content/306/1/79.short
(Download: 01.02.2013).
(1981a): An electrical tuning mecha-
nism in turtle cochlear hair cells. – J.
312 (1): 377-412, jp.physoc.
org/content/312/1/377.short (Download:
01.02.2013).
(1981b): Non-linearities in the responses
315
(1): 317-338, jp.physoc.org/content/315/1/317.
short (Download: 01.02.2013).
      
(1986): Ultrastructural features of the ven-
tromedial region of the laminar nucleus
in the red-eared turtle (Chrysemys scripta
elegans) . – J. Comp. Neurol., New York,
248 (4): 555-572.

        
the auditory hair cell mechanotransducer
      
558 (3): 769-792, onlinelibrary.wiley.
com/doi/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.061267/full
(Download: 01.02.2013).


evidence of posthatching parental care in

127 (1): 2432.
 (1978):
The coding of sound pressure and frequency

R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., London, 203
(1151): 209-218, rspb.royalsocietypublishing.
org/content/203/1151/209.short (Download:
01.02.2013).
(1980): The origin of tuning in turtle
cochlear hair cells. – Hear. Res., Amsterdam,
2 (3-4): 447-454.
       
 (2001): Clues to the cochlear ampli-
      
Amsterdam, 24 (3): 169-175, www.ruf.rice.
edu/~bioewhit/courses/bioe592/mat/Eatock/Ar-
ticles/fettiplace+TINS+review.pdf (Download:
01.02.2013).

 (2005a): Female preference for
    
tortoises Testudo hermanni. – Behav. Ecol.,
Oxford, 16 (1): 301-308, beheco.oxfordjourn-
als.org/content/16/1/301.short (Download:
01.02.2013).
-

(2005b): Courtship displays and mounting
calls are honest, condition-dependent signals

tortoises. – Can. J. Zool., Ottawa, 83 (10):
1306-1313.
, J. C. (2005): The underwater acoustic
repertoire of the long-necked, freshwater turtle
Chelodina oblonga    

murdoch.edu.au/39/ (Download: 01.02.2013).
        
 (2009): Voice of the turtle: The un-
derwater acoustic repertoire of the long-necked
freshwater turtle, Chelodina oblonga. – J.
126(1): 434-443,

01.02.2013).
  (1970): Traité de Zoologie.
Tome XIV Fasc. II: Reptiles: Caractères gé-

747 pp.
RADIATA 22 (2), 2013 13
Stéphane GaGno
   (1981): Evidence for
auditory localization ability in the turtle. – J.
Aud. Res., Groton, 21 (4): 255-261.
(1982): Bone conduction hearing in
turtles. – J. Aud. Res., Groton, 22 (3): 153-
160.
(1983): Turtle shells as an auditory
receptor. – J. Aud. Res., Groton, 23 (4):
251-260.
-
       
reception of bone-conducted sound.– J. Aud.
Res., Groton, 23 (2): 119-125.
     -
    (2011):
Courtship displays are condition-dependent
      
Greek tortoises, Testudo gracea. – Chel. Cons.
Biol., Lunenburg, 10 (1): 10-17, vipersgar-
 
01.02.2013).
-
 (1969): Hear-
ing in the giant sea turtle, Chelonia mydas.
64
(3): 884-890, www.pnas.org/content/64/3/884.
short (Download: 01.02.2013).
  (1996): Otites des Chéloniens:
pyogranulome du tympan. – Friskies Veteri-
nary International, Vevey, 2: 37-44.
     (1977): The
-
ders), 624 pp.
   (1978): The sensory
      
    289  

full.pdf (Summary, download: 01.02.2013).
(1980): Central responses to me-
chanical and electrical stimulation of the
carapace in the tortoise. – Comp. Biochem.
66 (2): 227-231.
(1983): Vibration-sensitive recep-

Oxford, 346   

(Summary, download: 01.02.2013).
(1986): Carapace and plastron sensi-
tivity to touch and vibration in the tortoise
(Testudo hermanni and T. graeca). – J.
Zool., London, 208 (3): 443-455.

  (2003): Vocalizations and
courtship intensity correlate with mounting
success in marginated tortoises Testudo
marginata. – Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.,
Berlin, 55 (1): 95-102.

  (2004): Larynx morphology
and sound production in three species of
261
(2): 175-183.
      

(2005): Underwater, low-frequency noise
in a coastal sea turtle habitat. – J. Acoust.
  117 (3): 1465-1472,
ebookbrowse.com/samuel-et-al-2005-
low-frequency-noise-x-sea-turtle-pdf-
d143896567 (Download: 01.02.2013).
       (2003):
Biophysical and pharmacological char-
acterization of voltage-gated calcium
currents in turtle auditory hair cells.
  549 (3): 697-717,
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/
jphysiol.2002.037481/full (Download:
01.02.2013).
14 RADIATA 22 (2), 2013
The Auditory Sense in Tortoises

Structure and growth of the
utricular macula in the inner ear of the slider
turtle Trachemys scripta. – J. Assoc. Res.
Otolaryngol., New York, 4 (4): 505-520.
   (1988): Auditory recep-
tor of the red-eared turtle: II. Afferent and
efferent synapses and innervations patterns.
– J. Comp. Neurol., New York, 276 (4):
588-606.
 (1981):

Biol. Sci. Bull., New York, 36 (4): 9-14.

 2007): Differences in neurogenesis
differentiate between core and Shell regions
of auditory nuclei in the turtle (Pelodiscus
sinensis): evolutionary implications. – Brain.
Behav. Evol., Basel, 70 (3): 174-186.
Author
Stéphane Gagno
Village des Tortues (SOPTOM)

83590 Gonfaron
France

Homepage: www.villagetortues.com
     
journal of the German Society for Herpetology
and Herpetoculture. It publishes the results of
      
including systematics, faunistics, ethology,
ecology, physiology, conservation biology and
captive breeding.
 BioSciences
Information Service (BIOSIS) of Biological
Abstracts and Zoological Record as well as
Herpetological Contents and other review
organs.
www.salamandra-journal.de
RADIATA 22 (2), 2013 15
... An association between (small and large) visual size and (high and low) acoustic pitch has been reported in humans [4,[17][18][19], chimpanzees [9] and dogs [12]. Tortoises can process auditory information (e.g. they can locate an auditory source to escape a maze [20] and respond to unexpected auditory stimuli, for instance, by retracting their head in the shell [21]). Studies on T. hermanni have shown that this species responds to airborne sounds in the range of 10 to 940 Hz [21,22]. ...
... Tortoises can process auditory information (e.g. they can locate an auditory source to escape a maze [20] and respond to unexpected auditory stimuli, for instance, by retracting their head in the shell [21]). Studies on T. hermanni have shown that this species responds to airborne sounds in the range of 10 to 940 Hz [21,22]. Copulating sounds emitted by males can influence females' choice of partners and indicate male quality [22,23]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Humans spontaneously match information coming from different senses, in what we call crossmodal associations. For instance, high-pitched sounds are preferentially associated with small objects, and low-pitched sounds with larger ones. Although previous studies reported crossmodal associations in mammalian species, evidence for other taxa is scarce, hindering an evolutionary understanding of this phenomenon. Here, we provide evidence of pitch-size correspondence in a reptile, the tortoise Testudo hermanni. Tortoises showed a spontaneous preference to associate a small disc (i.e. visual information about size) with a high-pitch sound (i.e. auditory information) and a larger disc to a low-pitched sound. These results suggest that crossmodal associations may be an evolutionary ancient phenomenon, potentially an organizing principle of the vertebrate brain.
... Tortoises can process auditory information (e.g., they can locate an auditory source to escape a maze [15] and respond to unexpected auditory stimuli, for instance by retracting the head in the shell [16]). To the best of our knowledge, there is no complete analysis for sound perception in tortoises, but studies on Testudo hermanni have shown that this species responds to airborne sounds in the range of 10 to 940 ...
... Hz [16,17]. Copulating sounds emitted by males can influence females' choice of partners, and indicate male fitness [17,18]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Humans spontaneously match information coming from different senses, what we call crossmodal associations. For instance, high pitch sounds are preferentially associated with small objects, and low pitch sounds with larger ones. While previous studies reported crossmodal associations in mammalian species, evidence for other taxa is scarce, hindering an evolutionary understanding of this phenomenon. Here we provide evidence of pitch-size correspondence in a reptile, the tortoise Testudo hermanni. Tortoises showed a spontaneous preference to associate a small disc (i.e., visual information about size) to a high pitch sound (i.e., auditory information), and a larger disc to a low pitch sound. These results suggest that crossmodal associations may be an evolutionary ancient phenomenon, potentially an organising principle of the vertebrate brain.
Article
Full-text available
The courtship behavior of male Greek tortoises (Testudo graeca) is based on a multiple signaling system that involves tactile, visual, olfactory, and acoustic signals. In some recent studies on marginated (Testudo marginata) and Hermann’s tortoises (Testudo hermanni) we showed that male mounting success was significantly and positively correlated to the intensity of courtship displays. This was due to the number of rams and bites and the number of calls emitted during mounting, which are considered to be condition-dependent signals that reliably convey information on male quality. In this correlative study, we analyzed relationships between male morphology, hematological profile, courtship intensity, vocalizations, and mounting success in a group of 104 Greek tortoises breeding in seminatural enclosures. As expected, our study showed that mounting success of males was positively correlated to the number of rams and the frequency of interactions during courtship and negatively correlated to the call duration. Moreover the hematocrit was positively correlated with the call rate and the number of rams. Therefore, courtship signals exhibited by male Greek tortoises, including vocalizations, reliably reveal different components of male condition, and females may use these signals to choose high-quality partners, as previously observed in marginated and Hermann’s tortoises
Article
Full-text available
Like other terrestrial tortoises, the courtship behaviour of Hermann's tortoises (Testudo hermanni Gmelin, 1789) is based on a multiple signalling system that involves visual, olfactory, tactile, and acoustic signals. In this study, we analysed relationships between male morphology, hematological profile, courtship intensity, vocalizations, and mounting success in Hermann's tortoises breeding in semi-natural enclosures to investigate the effects of male condition on signals exhibited during courtship and on their mounting success. Results showed that mounting success of Hermann's tortoise males was positively affected by the number of sexual interactions/h, number of bites given to the female during interactions, and by call rate and frequency-modulation range. Call rate, frequency-modulation range, and number of sexual interaction/h increased with hematocrit value, while number of bites given to females decreased with leukocyte concentration. In conclusion, courtship signals exhibited by Hermann's tortoise males, including vocalizations, reliably reveal different components of male condition, and females may use these multiple traits to choose high-quality partners. This is the first study documenting the condition-dependent nature of tortoise courting signals and their effect on male mounting success.
Article
Full-text available
Until recently, freshwater turtles were thought to be silent reptiles, neither vocalizing nor hearing very well. We recorded individuals in nature, captivity, and during interactions between adults and hatchlings and show that hatchlings and adult turtles, Podocnemis expansa, produce sounds in and out of the water. Sounds were emitted by hatchlings inside the egg, in open nests, in the river, and in captive conditions. Adult females were recorded producing sounds in the river, while basking, while nesting, and in captivity. Females were recorded in the river approaching and responding to hatchling sounds. We detected 2,122 sounds, classified in 11 different types. These data suggest that there is sound communication between adults and hatchings and that these sounds may be used to congregate hatchlings with adults for mass migration. Hatchlings and females with transmitters were found migrating together. We consider these findings as the first evidence of acoustic communication mediating posthatching parental care in chelonians. We anticipate that our findings will influence the way turtle behavior is studied and interpreted, and add communication and sound pollution to turtle conservation concerns. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Turtles, like other amphibious animals, face a trade-off between terrestrial and aquatic hearing. We used laser vibrometry and auditory brainstem responses to measure their sensitivity to vibration stimuli and to airborne versus underwater sound. Turtles are most sensitive to sound underwater, and their sensitivity depends on the large middle ear, which has a compliant tympanic disc attached to the columella. Behind the disc, the middle ear is a large air-filled cavity with a volume of approximately 0.5 ml and a resonance frequency of approximately 500 Hz underwater. Laser vibrometry measurements underwater showed peak vibrations at 500-600 Hz with a maximum of 300 µm s(-1) Pa(-1), approximately 100 times more than the surrounding water. In air, the auditory brainstem response audiogram showed a best sensitivity to sound of 300-500 Hz. Audiograms before and after removing the skin covering reveal that the cartilaginous tympanic disc shows unchanged sensitivity, indicating that the tympanic disc, and not the overlying skin, is the key sound receiver. If air and water thresholds are compared in terms of sound intensity, thresholds in water are approximately 20-30 dB lower than in air. Therefore, this tympanic ear is specialized for underwater hearing, most probably because sound-induced pulsations of the air in the middle ear cavity drive the tympanic disc.
Article
Full-text available
The courtship and mounting behavior of promiscuous tortoises is based on a multiple signaling system that includes visual, olfactory, tactile, and acoustic signals. Vocalizations related to mounting seem to be particularly intriguing because tortoises vocalize mainly at this time. Vocalizations and courtship behavior might be costly for males, and if these costs increase differentially for different males, then the potential exists for vocalizations and displays to reveal male individual quality on which females could base their mate choice. In the present study, by using individuals breeding in seminatural enclosures, we experimentally investigated whether the mounting call of male Hermann's tortoises (Testudo hermanni) represents a relevant stimulus to both males and females. We also looked for potential preference toward different acoustic stimuli in order to determine which call features, if any, played a role in attracting potential partners or deterring rivals. Females were sensitive to call playback, whereas males apparently paid little attention to playback. In addition, females showed a significant preference toward high-pitched calls emitted at high rate. Also, females exhibited a strong tendency toward short-duration calls. Because call rate is related to hematocrit in Hermann's tortoise males, by responding to fast-rate calls females are also choosing high-quality partners as sires of their offspring. This is the first study in which an attractive function of tortoise vocalizations has been documented. Copyright 2005.
Article
The courtship and mounting behaviour of tortoises is elaborate, and based on a multiple signalling system involving visual, olfactory and acoustic signals. Vocalizations related to mounting seem to be particularly significant because tortoises vocalize mainly at this time. Vocalizations and courtship behaviour may be costly for males, and if these costs increase differentially for different males, then the potential exists for vocalizations and displays to reveal male individual quality. In this correlative study, we analysed relationships between male mounting success and morphological and behavioural traits, particularly acoustic signals, exhibited by male marginated tortoises (Testudo marginata) during courtship, in a group of 94 individuals breeding in semi-natural enclosures. For each male, we estimated general body condition, courtship intensity and mounting success; calls of mounting males were recorded and four sonagraphic features were measured. Calls differed significantly among males, and two features varied according to body condition. Male mounting success significantly increased according to the male/female size-ratio, suggesting the existence of a size-based assortative mating. Mounting success was also highly correlated with courtship intensity, measured as number of bites and rams given to females before mounting, and with number of calls emitted during mounting. Finally, mounting success was negatively related to call duration. To our knowledge, this is the first study in which features of tortoise vocalizations are shown to convey reliable information about male quality in socio-sexual contexts.
Article
1.1. Percussion or electrical stimulation of the carapace in T graeca elicited responses at the ipsilateral cord dorsum. The segmental levels of inflow were identified by mapping and dorsal rhizotomy.2.2. The waveform properties of the cord dorsum potentials resembled those associated with cutaneous stimulation.3.3. The effects of local stimulation and local anaesthesia indicate that a proportion of nerve endings in the carapace are present in the superficial layers of the thecal bone.4.4. Conduction velocity of afferents from the carapace was 14.5 m/sec (mean) at 23–25°C in the ipsilateral dorsal tract and therefore in the upper range for the population of tract fibres.
Article
Sound stimuli are detected in the cochlea by vibration of hair bundles on sensory hair cells, which activates mechanotransducer ion channels and generates an electrical signal. Remarkably, the process can also work in reverse with additional force being produced by the ion channels as they open and close, evoking active movements of the hair bundle. These movements could supplement the energy of the sound stimuli but to be effective they would need to be very fast. New measurements in the turtle ear have shown that such active bundle movements occur with delays of less than a millisecond, and are triggered by the entry of Ca2+ into the cell via the mechanotransducer channel. Furthermore, their speed depends on the frequency to which the hair cell is most sensitive, suggesting that such movements could be important in cochlear amplification and frequency discrimination.