Article

King Solomon’s Mines? A Re-Assessment of Finds in the Arabah

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

My aim in this lecture is to reopen the question of the date of copper-mining operations in the southern Arabah. Until the 1960's it was believed, on the basis of Nelson Glueck's investigations, that mining and smelting camps in the Arabah, at Timna and elsewhere, were worked primarily during the time of Solomon and later, from the 10th century to the 6th century BC. In the 1960's, the Arabah Expedition, led by Beno Rothenberg, produced evidence for a much earlier dating. Dr. Rothenberg's book on the excavations at Timna, published in 1972, exploited the popular biblical associations of the site in its title -Timna: Valley of the Biblical Copper Mines -but it actually refuted that title by redating the supposedly Solomonic mining activity to the 14th-12th centuries BC, and affirming: 'There is no evidence whatsoever of any copper mining or smelting activities in the western Arabah later than the twelfth century BC until the renewal of the industry in the Roman period.' 1 This paper will question the accuracy of this statement, and will urge greater care in dating the finds from the Arabah. It will indicate various lines of evidence which strongly imply occupation and mining activity between the 10th and 6th centuries BC. I A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE DEBATE The Timna Valley lies 30 km due north of modern Elat, on the west side of the southern Arabah.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

Article
Full-text available
This article studies the chronology of the New Kingdom Egyptian copper mining in the southern Arabah valley, and particularly Timna, traditionally dated in the 13th–12th centuries BCE. A reassessment is made of the local archaeological evidence and especially of the findings of the Hejazi Qurayya pottery in archaeological assemblages of the southern Levant. It is argued that the chronology of the New Kingdom activities at Timna needs a revision towards lower dates.
Article
In this study I review two conflicting scenaria of the history of northwestern Arabia from approximately 1300 to 200 BC and discuss their theoretical and methodological determinants. The still sparse archaeological and historic information on this topic has been used in two quite different ways. On one hand there is the traditional culture historical approach which subordines all social interpretation to the precise strictures of an interrupted ceramic typology, on the other a recent attempt to interpret archaeological and textual data within the theoretical framework of a long-term historical model that integrates the Hejaz into the broader Near Eastern world system. I argue that these two approaches reflect fundamentally different approaches to the study of ancient society and that each incorporates a conceptual approach that necessarily determines its interpretational outcome. Furthermore I conclude that use of an inclusive theoretical model permits better integration of the growing archaeological and textual information bases and obviates much of the inconsistency and interpretational naivity that unavoidably derives from the culture historica approach.
Article
Full-text available
The figure of Hiram I of Tyre has called powerfully the attention of the researchers especially because of his relation with the king Solomon, though it is necessary to admit that it is very small what can be on the same one, up to the point of having been doubted even of the veracity of the statement that he speaks to us about him as we know it as we know it. By it in this article there is studied the information that we have in the matter, as well as the principal aspects that during his hypothetical reign made possible a stage in which the power and influence of Tyre increased on having begun an expansive phase towards the surrounding territories, close to an active trade to long distance, sitting this way the bases of the later colonial process in the central and western Mediterranean. La figura de Hiram I de Tiro ha llamado poderosamente la atención de los investigadores sobre todo a causa de su relación con el rey Salomón, si bien es preciso reconocer que es muy poco lo que se sabe sobre el mismo, hasta el punto de haberse dudado incluso de la veracidad del relato que nos habla de él tal y como lo conocemos. Por ello en este artículo se estudian los datos que tenemos al respecto, así como los principales aspectos que durante su hipotético reinado hicieron posible una etapa en la que el poder e influencia de Tiro se acrecentó al comenzar una fase expansiva hacia los territorios circundantes, junto a un activo comercio a larga distancia, sentando así las bases del posterior proceso colonial en el Mediterráneo central y occidental.
Oxford: OUP; Jerusalem: Massada, 1978) 1186, 1201-1202; cf
  • Rothenberg
Rothenberg, Encyclopedia of Arch. Excavs. vol. IV (Oxford: OUP; Jerusalem: Massada, 1978) 1186, 1201-1202; cf. Buried History 13 (1979) 49.
  • H W Scharpenseel
  • F Pietig
  • H Schiffmann
H. W. Scharpenseel, F. Pietig and H. Schiffmann, Radiocarbon 18/3 (1976) 286-287.
  • R Burleigh
  • A Hewson
R. Burleigh and A. Hewson, Radiocarbon 21/3 (1979) 349.