Content uploaded by Beatriz Mejia-Constain
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Beatriz Mejia-Constain on Feb 05, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
When metaphors go literally beyond their territories:
The impact of age on figurative language
Beatriz Mejía-Constaín, Oury Monchi, Nathalie Walter, Marianne
Arsenault, Noureddine Senhadji & Yves Joanette
As one of the most integrated components of language, the understand-
ing of metaphors has sparked some of the greatest interest and debate with
regard to how and where it is sustained by the brain. Traditionally, the
right hemisphere was thought to be the locus of metaphor comprehension.
However, the recent literature reported in this article suggests that the
processing of metaphors is the product of a complex interplay and cooperation
between the two hemispheres. In fact, the question of how the aging brain
processes metaphors remains unresolved. The present study aims to provide
insight into the nature of changes in the processing of metaphors in normal
aging. We describe the different patterns of interhemispheric activation in
younger and older adults during processing of literal and conventional meta-
phorical meanings of words. A total of 10 younger adults and 10 older adults
were scanned via 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging while perform-
ing a semantic judgment task using pairs of words: targets with literal or
conventional metaphorical relationships and distractors paired with concrete
or abstract words. The metaphorical-literal contrast showed significant
increased activity in the superior frontal gyrus bilaterally in both groups and
in the inferior frontal gyrus and the posterior cingulate cortex in the older
group only. Both groups showed a left lateralization. We concluded that aging
is associated with changes in the pattern of neural activity when processing
conventional metaphors. The results are analyzed in the light of the recent
literature proposing age-related neurofunctional reorganization, namely the
HAROLD and PASA phenomena in the context of language processing.
Keywords: aging, language, conventional metaphors, functional reorganiza-
tion, functional magnetic resonance imaging
Italian Journal of Linguistics 22.1 (2010), pp. 41-60 (Received December 2009)
The impact of age on figurative language
57
Ah A r e n s Kathleen, Ho-Ling Li u , Chia-Ying Le e , Shu-Ping Go o n g , Shin-Yi
FA n g & Yuan-Yu Hs u 2007. Functional MRI of conventional and anoma-
lous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language 100. 163-171.
An A k i David, Miriam FA u s t & Shlomo Kr A v e t z 1998. Cerebral hemispheric
asymmetries in processing metaphors. Neuropsychologia 36. 691-700.
An d e r s o n Nicole D., Tetsuya Ii d A k A , Roberto CA b e z A , Shitij KA p u r , Anthony R.
Mcin t o s h & Fergus I. M. Cr A i k 2000. The effects of divided attention on
encoding and retrieval–related brain activity: A PET study of young and
older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences 12. 775-792.
BA n i c h Marie T. 1998. The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interac-
tion in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition 36. 128-157.
BL A n c h e t Sophie, Béatrice De s g r A n g e s , Pierre De n i s e , Bernard Le c h e v A L i e r ,
Francis Eu s t A c h e & Sylvain FA u r e 2001. New questions on the hemi-
spheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry (HERA) model assessed by divid-
ed visual-field tachistoscopy in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 39.
502-509.
Bo n n A u d Véronique, Roger Gi L & Pierre In g r A n d 2002. Metaphorical and non-
metaphorical links: a behavioral and ERP study in young and elderly
adults. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology 32. 258-
268.
Bo t t i n i Gabriella, Rhiannon Co r c o r A n , Roberto St e r z i , Eraldo PA u L e s u , Pietro
Sc h e n o n e , Pina Sc A r p A , Richard S. J. Fr A c k o w i A k & Christopher D. Fr i t h
1994. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative
aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study.
Brain 117. 1241-1253.
Br o w n e L L Hiram H., Heather Po t t e r & Diane Mi c h e L o w 1984. Sensibility to
lexical denotation and connotation in brain damaged patients: A double
dissociation? Brain and Language 22. 253-265.
Br o w n e L L Hiram H., Tracy L. Si m p s o n , Amy M. Bi h r L e , Heather Po t t e r &
Howard GA r d n e r 1990. Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word
meaning by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 28.
375-383.
Bibliographical References
Beatriz Mejía-Constaín et al.
58
CA b e z A Roberto 2001. Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Contributions of func-
tional neuroimaging. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 42. 277-286.
CA b e z A Roberto 2002. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The
HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging 17. 85-100.
CA b e z A Roberto, Anthony R. Mcin t o s h , Endel Tu L v i n g , Lars Ny b e r g & Cheryl
L. Gr A d y 1997. Aged-related differences in effective neural connectivity
during encoding and recall. Neuroreport 8. 3479-3483.
Coffey C. Eduard, Graham RAtcLiff, Judith A. SAxton, R. Nick BryAn,
Linda P. Fr i e d & Joseph F. Lu c k e 2001. Cognitive correlates of human
brain aging: A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging investigation.
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 13. 471-485.
CoLLins D. Louis, Peter NeeLin, Terry M. Peters & Alan C. EvAns 1994.
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in stand-
ardized Talairach space. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 18.
192-205.
DA v i s Simon W., Nancy A. De n n i n s , Sander M. DA s e L A A r , Mathias S. FL e c k &
Roberto CA b e z A 2008. Qué PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging.
Cerebral Cortex 18. 1201-1209.
Ev i A t A r Zohar & Marcel A. Ju s t 2006. Brain correlates of discourse process-
ing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor compre-
hension. Neuropsychologia 44. 2348-2359.
FA u s t m A n n Anja, Bruce E. Mu r d o c h , Simon P. Fi n n i g A n & David A. Co p L A n d
2007. Effects of advancing age on the processing of semantic anomalies
in adults: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Experimental
Aging Research 33. 439-460.
Fr i e d e r i c i Angela D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence pro-
cessing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6. 78-84.
GAgnon Louise, Pierre GouLet, Francine Giroux & Yves JoAnette 2003.
Processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings of
words after right- and left-hemispheric lesion. Brain and Language 87.
217-226.
Gi o r A Rachel, Eran ZA i d e L , Nachum So r o k e r , Gila BA t o r i & Asa KA s h e r 2000.
Differential effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understand-
ing sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 15. 63-83.
Gi o r A Rachel 2007. Is metaphor special? Brain and Language 100. 111-114.
gr i c e H. Paul 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Co L e & Jerry L. Mo r g A n
(eds.). Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
41-58.
Gr o s s m A n Murray, Ayanna M. Co o k e , Christian De v i t A , David AL s o p , John A.
De t r e , Willis Ch e n & James Gr e e 2002. Age-related changes in working
memory during sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. NeuroImage
15. 302-317.
KA c i n i k Nathalie A. & Christine Ch i A r e L L o 2007. Understanding metaphors:
Is the right hemisphere uniquely involved? Brain and Language 100.
188-207.
Ke m p L e r Daniel, Diana VA n LA n c k e r , Virginia MA r c h m A n & Elisabeth BA t e s
1999. Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain
damage. Developmental Neuropsychology 15. 327-349.
The impact of age on figurative language
59
Le e Susan S. & Mirella DA p r e t t o 2006. Metaphorical vs. literal words mean-
ings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere.
NeuroImage 29. 536-544.
MA r c o t t e Karine & Ana I. An s A L d o 2010. The neural correlates of semantic
feature analysis in chronic aphasia: Discordant patterns according to
the Etiology. Seminars in Speech and Language 31. 52-63.
MAshAL Nira, Miriam FAust & Talma HendLer 2005. The role of the right
hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application
of Principal Components Analysis to fMRI data. Neuropsychologia 43.
2084-2100.
MA s h A L Nira, Miriam FA u s t , Talma He n d L e r & Mark Ju n g -be e m A n 2007. An
fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of
novel metaphoric expressions. Brain and Language 100. 115-126.
MA s h A L Nira & Miriam FA u s t 2009. Conventionalisation of novel metaphors:
A shift in hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body,
Brain and Cognition 14. 573-589.
Me r c u r e Evelyne 2004. Dynamique interhémisphérique dans le traitement du
sens métaphorique des mots. Montréal: Université de Montréal. Master
dissertation.
MonettA Laura, Clairélaine OuLLet-pLAmondon & Yves JoAnette 2006.
Simulating the pattern of right-hemisphere-damaged patients for the
processing of the alternative metaphorical meanings of words: evidence in
favor of a cognitive resources hypothesis. Brain and Language 96. 171-177.
Ne b e L Katharina, Holger Wiese, Philipp Stude, Armin De Greiff, Hans-
Christoph Di e n e r & Matthias Ke i d e L 2005. On the basis of focused and
divided attention. Cognitive Brain Research 25. 760-776.
Ou L L e t -pL A m o n d o n Clairélaine, Oury Mo n c h i , Nouredinne Se n h A d j i , Nathalie
WA L t e r & Yves Jo A n e t t e 2006. Déplacement de l’activation en IRMf lors
du traitement sémantique des mots associé au vieillissement. Canadian
Journal of Aging 25 (Suppl. 1). 220-221.
Ou L L e t -pL A m o n d o n Clairélaine, Oury Mo n c h i , Nouredinne Se n h A d j i , Nathalie
WA L t e r & Yves Jo A n e t t e submitted. Successful aging and neurofunction-
al reorganization: the case of the semantic processing of words.
RA p p Alexander M., Dirk T. Le u b e , Michael Er b , Wolfgang Gr o d d & Tilo T.
J. Kircher 2004. Neural correlates of metaphors processing. Cognitive
Brain Research 20. 392-402.
RA p p Alexander M., Dirk T. Le u b e , Michael Er b , Wolfgang Gr o d d & Tilo T. J.
Ki r c h e r 2007. Laterality in metaphor processing: lack of evidence from
functional magnetic resonance imaging for the right hemisphere theory.
Brain and Language 100. 142-149.
Reuter-Lorenz Patricia A., Louise StAnczAk & Andrea MiLLer 1999. Neural
recruitment and cognitive aging: two hemispheres are better than one,
especially as you age. Psychological Science 10. 494-500.
SArter Martin & John P. Br u n o 2004. Developmental origins of the age-
related decline in cortical cholinergic function and associated cognitive
abilities. Neurobiology of Aging 25. 1127-1139.
SeArLe John 1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Beatriz Mejía-Constaín et al.
60
St e r n Yaakov 2009. Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia 47. 2015-2028.
StringAris Argyris, Nick Medford, Rachel Gi o r A , Vincent C. GiAmpietro ,
Michael J. BrAmmer & Anthony S. DAvid 2007. Deriving meaning:
Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal and non-meaningful
sentences. Brain and Language 100. 150-162.
Tompkins Connie A. 1990. Knowledge and strategies for processing lexi-
cal metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of
Speech and Hearing Research 33. 307-316.
TorreAno Lisa A., Cristina CAcciAri & Sam GLucksberg 2005. When Dogs
Can Fly: Level of Abstraction as a Cue to Metaphorical Use of Verbs.
Metaphor and Symbol 20. 259-274.
VA n De r Linden Martial & Michel Hupet 1994. Le vieillissement cognitif.
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Wi n g f i e L d Arthur & Murray Gr o s s m A n 2006. Language and the aging brain:
Patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging.
Journal of Neurophysiology 96. 2830-2839.
Wo r s L e y Keith J., Chia Hui Li A o , Janice As t o n , Valentina Pe t r e , Gillian H.
Du n c A n , Frank Mo r A L e s , Alan C. Ev A n s 2002. A general statistical anal-
ysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage 15. 1-15.
WorsLey Keith J., Sean MArrett, Peter NeeLin, Alain C. VAndAL, Karl J.
Friston, Alan C. EvAns 1996. A unified statistical approach for deter-
mining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human
Brain Mapping 4. 58-73.