Braz. J. Biol., 2014, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 283-289 283283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.13112 Original Article
Patterns and inferred processes associated with sea turtle
strandings in Paraíba State, Northeast Brazil
Poli, C.a,b*, Lopez, LCS.a, Mesquita, DO.a, Saska, C.a,b and Mascarenhas, R.a,b
aDepartamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB,
Cidade Universitária, Castelo Branco, CEP 58059-900, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
bProjeto Tartarugas Urbanas, Associação Guajiru: Ciência - Educação - Meio Ambiente,
Av. Litorânea, Intermares, CEP 58310-000, Cabedelo, PB, Brazil.
Received July 16, 2012 – Accepted February 14, 2013 – Distributed May 31, 2014
(With 1 gure)
This study analysed sea turtle strandings on the coast of Paraíba State, Northeastern Brazil, from August 2009 to
July 2010. A total of 124 strandings were recorded in this period: green turtle Chelonia mydas (n = 106), hawksbill
Eretmochelys imbricata (n = 15), olive ridley Lepidochelys olivacea (n = 2) and loggerhead Caretta caretta (n = 1).
Of all turtles for which the Curved Carapace Length (CCL) was measured (n = 122), only 12 individuals (9.7%) were
adults. Twenty individuals had synthetic anthropogenic debris in the gastrointestinal tract. Other traces of human
interactions were observed in 43 individuals, such as injuries caused by entanglement in shing lines or nets, collisions
with vessels, direct contact with oil spills and lesions caused by sharp or spiked objects. Moreover, in 28.5% of the
stranded turtles, the presence of external tumors was noticed, suggestive of bropapillomatosis and in 9.7%, shark
bite marks were observed. Of the 107 individuals that were sexed, 76 were females and 31 were males. Most turtles
(72.6%) became stranded during the spring/summer (between October and March). We found evidence of human
interactions (injuries) in half of the strandings, but in most cases it was not possible to determine if such interactions
were the cause of death. A logistic regression found a signicant relationship between CCL, ingestion of debris and
lesions caused by sharks or spiked objects. Systematic data collection from stranded sea turtles can provide useful
biological information, such as seasonal and spatial patterns in their occurrence and mortality, age structure, sex ratio
and diet, as well as possible mortality causes.
Keywords: threatened species, human impact, beach strandings, green sea turtle.
Padrões e inferências associadas com encalhes de tartarugas
marinhas no Estado da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil
Este estudo analisou encalhes de tartarugas marinhas na costa do Estado da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil, de agosto
de 2009 a julho de 2010. Neste período, 124 encalhes foram registrados: tartaruga-verde Chelonia mydas (n = 106),
tartaruga-de-pente Eretmochelys imbricata (n = 15), tartaruga-oliva Lepidochelys olivacea (n = 2) e cabeçuda Caretta
caretta (n = 1). Dentre todas as tartarugas que tiveram o Comprimento Curvilíneo da Carapaça (CCC) medido
(n = 122), apenas 12 indivíduos (9,7%) foram considerados adultos. Vinte indivíduos tinham detritos antropogênicos
sintéticos no trato gastrointestinal. Em 43 indivíduos, outros vestígios de interações humanas foram observados, tais
como lesões causadas por emaranhamento em linhas ou redes de pesca, colisões com embarcações, contato direto com
derramamentos de óleo e lesões causadas por objetos perfurocortantes. Além disso, em 28,5% das tartarugas encalhadas,
foi observada a presença de tumores externos sugestivos de bropapilomatose e em 9,7%, foram observadas marcas
de mordidas de tubarão. Dos 107 indivíduos sexados, 76 eram fêmeas e 31 eram machos. A maioria das tartarugas
(72,6%) encalhou durante a primavera/verão (entre outubro e março). Foram encontrados sinais de interações humanas
(lesões) em metade dos encalhes, mas na maioria dos casos, não foi possível determinar se tais interações foram a causa
da morte. A regressão logística encontrou uma relação signicativa entre CCC e ingestão de detritos, lesões causadas
por objetos perfuro-cortantes e ataques de tubarões. A coleta sistemática de dados de tartarugas marinhas encalhadas
pode fornecer informações biológicas úteis, tais como padrões sazonais e espaciais na sua ocorrência e mortalidade,
estrutura etária, razão sexual, dieta, bem como possíveis causas de mortalidade.
Palavras-chave: espécies ameaçadas, impacto humano, encalhes de praia, tartaruga verde.
Braz. J. Biol., 2014, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 283-289
Poli, C. et al.
Sea turtles are long-distance migratory animals and
occupy niches in different marine environments and
geographical regions throughout their different life cycle
stages, usually ranging from pelagic environments, as
hatchlings, to several coastal areas in their juvenile and
adult stages (Bolten, 2003). Due to migratory habits, sea
turtles are susceptible to threats in both offshore and coastal
environments (Bolten, 2003). Five sea turtle species use the
Brazilian coast for reproduction and feeding: loggerhead
(Caretta caretta Linnaeus, 1758), green (Chelonia mydas
Linnaeus, 1758), leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea
Vandelli, 1761), olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea
Eschscholtz, 1829) and hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata
Linnaeus, 1766) (Marcovaldi and Dei Marcovaldi, 1999).
All species are listed as threatened by extinction globally
(IUCN, 2011) and nationally (Martins and Molina, 2008).
Sea turtles face a wide variety of stressors, mainly
anthropogenic (Lutcavage et al., 1997). In Brazil, a
major cause of sea turtle mortality is linked to incidental
capture in shing artifacts (Mascarenhas et al., 2005;
Marcovaldi et al., 2006; Bugoni et al., 2008). Marine
pollution is another serious threat that causes habitat
degradation and turtle death through debris ingestion or
entanglement (Bjorndal et al., 1994; Ivar do Sul and Costa,
2007). Along most of the Brazilian coast, ingestion of
marine debris by sea turtles has frequently been reported
(Bugoni et al., 2001; Mascarenhas et al., 2004; Tourinho et al.,
2010; Guebert-Bartholo et al., 2011). Moreover, although
prohibited in most of the world, all sea turtle species have
been used for decades as a protein source, entailing the
consumption of their meat or eggs, or as raw material in
the manufacture of ornaments and artifacts (Marcovaldi
and Dei Marcovaldi, 1999; Campbell, 2003).
In addition to human threats, sea turtles suffer the impacts
of many types of disease, among which bropapillomatosis
(FP) is the most studied (Herbst, 1994). FP is a debilitating
disease and can be lethal, or may impair the animal’s ability
to feed or swim (George, 1997).
Part of the dead or debilitated animals end up stranded on
beaches, and this performs a fundamental role in ecological
studies and species conservation (Epperly et al., 1996).
Systematic data collection from stranded sea turtles can
provide useful biological information, such as seasonal
and spatial patterns in their occurrence and mortality, age
structure, sex ratio, diet, interannual variations associated
with climatic or anthropogenic events, as well as possible
causes of mortality (Bjorndal, 1999). In Paraíba State,
Northeastern Brazil, strandings of green, hawksbill, olive
ridley and loggerhead sea turtles have been recorded
(Mascarenhas et al., 2005; Mascarenhas and Iverson, 2008).
Given the current vulnerability of all sea turtle species,
the systematic study of strandings, with an emphasis on
research into their causes, is becoming increasingly urgent.
This study aimed to examine sea turtle strandings on the
coast of Paraíba State from August 2009 to July 2010,
testing the following hypotheses: (1) The occurrence of
different species strandings is not homogeneous among
species and seasons; (2) There is signicant difference in
the occurrence of strandings among life stages and sexes;
(3) There is a relationship between Curved Carapace Length
(CCL) and events associated with stranding.
2. Material and Methods
The study was conducted from August 2009 to July
2010 on the coast of Paraíba State, Northeastern Brazil,
along 15 km of urban beaches in the municipalities of João
Pessoa (7°08’S and 34°48’W) and Cabedelo (7°01’S and
34°49’W) (Figure 1). Daily monitoring was performed
between Bessa (7°05’S and 34°49’W) and Ponta de
Campina (7°01’S and 34°49’W). For the remaining area
(Cabo Branco, Tambaú and Manaíra beaches), stranding
observations were reported to the researchers through
partnerships with environmental agencies and the local
community, via a telephone line, “SOS Turtles”.
In the case of dead individuals, the external data were
collected at the stranding location, such as the carcass
decomposition stage, evidence of anthropogenic interaction,
presence of tumors, presence of individual marks and
evidence of interaction with other fauna. The carcass
decomposition stage was divided into categories: a) without
decomposition evidence; b) moderate decomposition; and
c) advanced decomposition. CCL and the Curved Carapace
Width (CCW) were measured using a exible tape with
0.1 cm accuracy. Individuals were classied as juveniles
or adults based on CCL measurements, considering the
minimum values of nesting females in nearby beaches (see
Baptistotte et al., 2003; Grossman et al., 2007; Marcovaldi
and Chaloupka, 2007; Silva et al., 2007; Santos et al., 2010
for reference values).
After the collection of external data, carcasses were
necropsied to collect additional data such as sex by
gonad examination, observation of internal tumors and
digestive tract analysis in search of anthropogenic material.
Gastrointestinal tracts were removed from the esophagus
to the nal portion of the intestine, and each organ was
analysed separately. Gastrointestinal content was washed
using sieves and, when present, anthropogenic debris was
Figure 1. Strandings distribution in the different months
between August 2009 and July 2010 on the Paraíba coast.
Braz. J. Biol., 2014, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 283-289 285
Patterns associated with turtle strandings
separated from organic items. Animals stranded alive were
moved to rehabilitation in the “Projeto Tartarugas Urbanas”
after external data collection. Animals that died during
rehabilitation underwent the same necropsy procedure.
Homogeneity in the occurrence of different stranded
species was conrmed using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov
test (Ayres et al., 2007). Other tests were performed only
for species where the number of strandings was above
20 individuals. A Chi-square test was applied to verify
homogeneity in the occurrence of juvenile and adult strandings
(Ayres et al., 2007). We performed a Kolmogorov–Smirnov
test (Ayres et al., 2007) to test whether the occurrence of
anthropogenic interactions was homogeneous. We also
performed a logistic regression (Fox, 2005) between
the CCL and the possible causes of stranding in order to
determine whether there was a relationship between the
size of the turtle and the different interactions observed. A
Chi-square test was applied to verify homogeneity in the
occurrence of male and female strandings (Ayres et al.,
2007). A Chi-square test was applied to conrm differences
in the occurrence of strandings in the winter and summer,
and a Rayleigh test was also performed in order to highlight
the period of highest stranding occurrence (Ayres et al.,
2007). For all statistical analyses, results were considered
signicant at an alpha 0.05 level (Zar, 1999).
From August 2009 to July 2010, 124 sea turtle strandings
were recorded in the study area. Fifteen turtles (12.1%)
were stranded alive but died during the rehabilitation
period. Regarding the decomposition status of the carcass,
19 (17.4%) were fresh, 29 (26.6%) were moderately
decomposed and 61 (56.0%) were in an advanced state
of decomposition. Parts of the carcasses were missing
in 20 individuals (16.1%). A total of 98 necropsies were
performed. The occurrence of stranded species was not
homogeneous (Kolmogorov–Smirnov maximum deviation
= 0.604, p < 0.01): 106 green turtles (85.4%), 15 hawksbill
(12.1%), two olive ridley (1.6%) and one loggerhead (0.9%).
Regarding age class, for all stranded turtles that were
measured (n = 122), only twelve individuals (9.7%) could
be considered adults (Table 1). The CCL and CCW of two
green turtles could not be measured due to the lack of a
partial or whole carapace. There was a signicant difference
between the occurrence of juvenile and adult green turtles
YATE S = 40.9, p = 0.0001), with nine adults observed
(8.6%, n = 9/104); for the other species, three hawksbills
and the only loggerhead were considered adult (Table 1).
A total of 98 gastrointestinal tracts were analysed,
of which 20 (20.4%) contained synthetic anthropogenic
debris: 13 green turtles (65.0%), 5 hawksbill (25.0%) and 2
olive ridley (10.0%). Moreover, 43 individuals (41.3%) of
the 104 whole carcasses showed other evidence of human
interactions, such as injuries caused by entanglement in
lines or nets (33.6%), collisions with vessels (3.8%), sharp
or spiked objects (3.8%) and direct contact with oil spills
(0.96%). The proportion of anthropogenic interactions was
not homogeneous for green turtles (Kolmogorov–Smirnov
maximum deviation = 0.383, p < 0.01).
In addition to the evidence of human interactions, other
carcasses showed signs that could be linked to causes of
debilitation that had possibly resulted in the stranding. In
28.5% (n = 30/105) of the stranded turtles, considering
the carcasses that were intact, the presence of external
tumors was noted, suggestive of FP, and even those that
were incomplete showed the same type of tumors. All
individuals that presented these tumors were green turtles,
with CCLs ranging between 37.9 and 76.4 cm (= 54 cm).
Shark bite marks were observed in 9.7% (n = 124) of the
carcasses. Of the 12 animals that showed evidence of
interactions with sharks, only two had a CCL < 75 cm,
indicating that they were either large juveniles or adults.
A logistic regression, performed for green sea turtle
data, showed a signicant relationship between the CCL
and ingestion of anthropogenic debris (estimate = –0.048,
p = 0.03); between the CCL and injuries caused by sharp
or spiked objects (estimate = 0.072, p = 0.01); and between
the CCL and interactions with sharks (estimate = 0.046, p =
0.001). The regression revealed no signicant relationship for
the remaining observations of possible causes of stranding
(entanglement in lines and nets, collisions with vessels,
contact with oil and tumors suggestive of FP_ Table 2).
Regarding sex, in 17 carcasses (13.7%) it was not
possible to determine gender due to the advanced stage
of decomposition. Of the 107 individuals sexed, 76 (71%)
were females and 31 (29%) were males. Female green
sea turtles predominated (χ
= 8.8, p = 0.003): of
91 individuals sexed, 66 (72.5%) were females and 25
(27.5%) were males. Regarding seasonality, strandings
predominated in the spring/summer (76.6%, n = 90;
= 12.3, p = 0.0004). A Rayleigh test conrmed
that the distribution of stranding occurrences was not
uniform (R = 38.9, p < 0.01), indicating a higher incidence
of strandings between October and February (Figure 1).
Table 1. Curved Carapace Length (CCL) and Curved Carapace Width (CCW) (mean and standard deviation) of the turtle
species collected in strandings on the Paraíba coast between August 2009 to July 2010. The maximum and minimum are in
Species CCL (cm) CCW (cm)
C. mydas (n = 104) 56.6 ± 21.5 (24.0-123.5) 52.2 ± 20.3 (22.2-111.7)
E. imbricata (n = 15) 48.8 ± 21.6 (30.9-91.2) 43.3 ± 19.9 (26.0-84.7)
L. olivacea (n = 2) 61.6 ± 2.3 (60.0-63.3) 66.0 ± 2.2 (64.4-67.6)
C. caretta (n = 1) 93.5 86
Braz. J. Biol., 2014, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 283-289
Poli, C. et al.
Our results corroborate the study of Mascarenhas et al.
(2005) in the same area, showing that green turtles are
the most frequently stranded species. The same results
have been found along the Brazilian coast, such as in
Rio de Janeiro (Reis et al., 2009), Rio Grande do Sul
(Bugoni et al., 2001) and Paraná (Guebert-Bartholo et al.,
2011). Green turtles are found in many feeding grounds
on the Brazilian coast (Marcovaldi and Dei Marcovaldi,
1999; Grossman et al., 2007), including the coral reefs of
the Paraíba coast (Mascarenhas et al., 2005), which may
explain the predominance of this species in strandings.
Hawksbills occurred in signicantly lower numbers
compared to green sea turtles; despite the Paraíba beaches
having been recognised as a nesting site for this species
(Mascarenhas et al., 2003), only three individuals were
considered sexually mature, and so these strandings
were not associated with their presence during the period
of reproductive activity in the area. It is probable that
hawksbill, olive ridley and loggerhead specimens died
and became stranded between the migration from their
nesting area to different foraging grounds. Whiting et al.
(2007), in a study of olive ridley turtles in Australia,
suggest that after the nesting season all turtles travel
between 180 and 1050 km to different foraging areas, using
coastal and continental habitats, and are able to forage
during migration before reaching their foraging grounds.
Telemetry studies in Brazil indicate that hawksbills migrate
between nesting areas in Bahia and foraging grounds in
Ceará State (Marcovaldi et al., 2011), and that there is a
migratory corridor along the entire coast of Northeastern
Brazil for loggerheads (Santos et al., 2011). Telemetry
studies for olive ridley turtles in Brazil highlight that there
is a displacement from the Espírito Santo coast to Pará
State (Castilhos et al., 2011). Beyond telemetry studies,
analysis of strandings along the Brazilian coast indicates
that turtles could be migrating to more southern feeding
areas, such as in the study of Reis et al. (2010a), which
suggests that feeding areas for olive ridley turtles are
found on the Rio de Janeiro coast. Considering this large
home range, and all the natural and anthropogenic risks to
which these animals are exposed, it is very plausible that
they were stranded during migration from their nesting
area to different foraging grounds.
Relative to life stage, similar studies in Brazil and
elsewhere have also reported a higher incidence of juvenile
strandings, irrespective of species (Bugoni et al., 2001;
Chaloupka et al., 2008; Reis et al., 2009). One explanation
for the high incidence of juvenile strandings is based on
their cycle life. Juveniles of the green, hawksbill, olive
ridley and loggerhead turtles usually migrate from ocean
areas to neritic environments, where they complete their
development and where there is greater food availability
(Bolten, 2003). However, coastal areas typically support
greater human activity and a greater accumulation of debris
(Aguirre and Lutz, 2004), which makes the sea turtles more
susceptible in these environments. Regarding sex ratio,
females predominated, as is the case in previous reports
of the area (Mascarenhas et al., 2005). Grossman et al.
(2007), in a study on green turtles in Atol das Rocas, also
report a higher frequency of females. The greater number
of females stranded is probably due to the fact that females
are more common in natural populations, in spite of there
being no studies that report females to be more susceptible
to threats than males in the marine environment.
It is evident in the present study and has been reported
elsewhere that human activity remains the main cause
of sea turtle mortality worldwide. In the present study,
shing activities followed by marine pollution were found
to be the main threats to turtles on the Paraíba coast. The
predominance of entanglement with shing apparatus as
the main human interaction registered in the stranded turtles
corroborates other studies where shing activity appears to
be one of the most important anthropogenic-related sources
of sea turtle mortality in the world (Marcovaldi et al., 2006;
Bugoni et al., 2008; Casale et al., 2010). In Paraíba State,
shing is mainly artisanal, comprising sailboats and small
motorboats shing in shallow waters near the coast and in
estuaries, deploying gillnets, hook-and-lines and shing
by manual collection (IBAMA, 2008). In lobster shing
on the Paraíba coast, 73% of the shermen carry out their
activities on the reefs and 24% between the reefs and the
beaches, using gillnets in 49% of cases (Oliveira et al.,
2009). Is important to note that this type of shing activity
is very dangerous for sea turtles, as has been reported by
Lima et al. (2010).
The present study showed that ingestion of marine
debris, especially plastic, is an important threat to sea
turtles, with the smaller green sea turtles having a higher
Table 2. Results of logistic regression performed between CCC and the possible causes of Chelonia mydas strandings.
Possible cause of stranding Estimate Stand. Error Z value Pr(>|z|)
Ingestion of marine debris –0.048 0.023 –2.076 0.03*
Entanglement in nets and lines 0.001 0.010 0.129 0.8
Collisions with vessels –0.017 0.033 –0.514 0.6
Injuries caused by sharp or spiked objects 0.072 0.030 2.364 0.01*
Contact with oil spills –0.138 0.139 –0.994 0.3
Shark attack 0.046 0.014 3.107 0.001*
Tumors suggestive of FP –0.007 0.010 –0.745 0.4
* Statistical signicance.
Braz. J. Biol., 2014, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 283-289 287
Patterns associated with turtle strandings
probability of ingesting plastic debris compared to larger
ones, conrming the results of previous studies (Balazs,
1985; Plotkin and Amos, 1990). Synthetic materials are
currently recognised as an important pollutant in marine
and coastal environments, and are reported in many studies
as the main type of debris found in these habitats (Ivar do
Sul and Costa, 2007; Ryan et al., 2009). The physical and
chemical effects of ingesting marine debris on sea turtles are
widely described in the literature (McCauley and Bjorndal,
1999; Bugoni et al., 2001; Tourinho et al., 2010). These
effects can be sub-lethal or lethal (Mascarenhas et al.,
2004; Tourinho et al., 2010), and therefore this interaction
is regarded as an important cause of stranding. Sea turtles
are prone to the ingestion of solid residues, which may
occur intentionally, when these residues are confused with
their natural foods or accidentally, when they are ingested
with food (Mrosovsky et al., 2009). Green sea turtles are
particularly prone to ingesting a large amount of marine
debris, mainly plastic, since it usually adheres to their main
food resource, the algae (Reis et al., 2010b).
In addition to the ingestion of anthropogenic debris, it
was possible to observe extreme oil contamination in the
entire body of a single individual, including the oral and
nasal cavities. The individual observed in this study was
an isolated case of visible contamination by oil, indicating
that the number of sea turtles on the Paraíba coast affected
by contact with oil spills would appear to be low.
Collision with vessels is further evidence of human
interaction being related to strandings, and is often the
cause of sea turtle death. Casale et al. (2010) point out
that collision with vessels was the second most common
cause of sea turtle death in the Mediterranean. However,
in the present study this interaction was not very common:
the strandings indicated that collisions occurred with the
carcass, not with a living turtle. Regarding evidence of
intentional injuries caused by sharp or spiked objects, two
main reasons are sustained to justify these activities: the use
of turtle meat for food and of the carapace keratin plates
for manufacture of ornamental items, or shing artifact
protection when animals, particularly large ones, are caught
and, in their struggle, rip the nets. This is corroborated by
logistic regression, which showed that larger individuals are
more susceptible to these types of injuries. The use of the
meat for consumption, and the carapace for the preparation
and sale of ornamental items has been reported in some
Brazilian cities (Marcovaldi and Dei Marcovaldi, 1999).
The occurrence of tumors in green turtles was expected,
since FP disease is recognized as more frequently affecting
this species (Aguirre and Lutz, 2004; Foley et al., 2005;
Reis et al., 2010b). Mascarenhas and Iverson (2008) report
tumors suggestive of FP in 26% of the strandings observed
on the Paraíba coast. Compared to that study, the results of
the present study showed a small increase in the incidence
of these tumors, and, moreover, we observed the presence
of both external and internal tumors in three animals,
especially in the lungs and intestine. The higher incidence
of tumors in individuals with CCLs of between 30 and
80 cm corroborates previous studies that report juveniles
as those that are mostly affected by FP (Aguirre and Lutz,
2004; Chaloupka et al., 2008). Foley et al. (2005) suggest
that the lack of FP in the smaller size classes (up to 30 cm)
could be explained by a lack of sufcient time for disease
symptoms to appear and, later, when these individuals
begin to migrate to coastal areas, they are exposed to a
greater concentration of pollutants (a possible co-factor
associated with FP), which could contribute to triggering
the disease. The sharp fall in the prevalence of the disease
in animals with CCLs < 80 cm could be explained by a
regression of tumors with age, or as a result of mortality
of individuals with FP before they have reached a larger
size (Foley et al., 2005). In addition, Van Houtan et al.
(2010) in their study reveal the relationship between turtle
size, eutrophication of foraging areas and the incidence of
invasive algae with the emergence of FP in green turtles.
By correlating disease with environmental factors, the
occurrence of FP can be used to evaluate ecosystem health
(Reis et al., 2010b).
The signicant seasonality observed in the occurrence of
strandings is probably related to the increase of anthropogenic
activities combined with the turtles migrating to their
nesting grounds. Fishing activities are more intense along
the Paraíba coast during the spring and summer (IBAMA,
2008). Moreover, during this period the movement of tourist
boats and the accumulation of marine debris on beaches
are both greater in this area (Mascarenhas et al., 2008).
We conclude that, despite conservation efforts and the
current Brazilian laws that penalize harmful practices that
threaten species, a range of human activities still endanger
sea turtle survival in the long-term. Fishing remains a
serious problem on the Paraíba coast, and interaction with
anthropogenic debris, as well as the signicant incidence of
FP, reveals a worrying environmental degradation. Urgent
measures are necessary, such as an increase in environmental
education activities and programs of regeneration and
environmental protection. Although there are numerous
studies on strandings of all sea turtle species, continued
monitoring is necessary along the entire Brazilian coast.
Furthermore, studies of population size, including tagging,
genetic analyses and behavioural studies, will be extremely
important in estimating the impact of mortality in this
Acknowledgements – We would like to thank the entire team
of volunteers of Projeto Tartarugas Urbanas (Associação
Guajiru) for their help in eld work, the Coordenação de
Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
for their nancial support, CNPq for a research fellowship
for DOM, and the Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências
Biológicas da Universidade Federal da Paraíba for supporting
AGUIRRE, A. and LUTZ, P., 2004. Marine turtles as sentinels of
ecosystem health: is fibropapillomatosis an indicator? EcoHealth,
vol. 1, no. 3, p. 275-283.
Braz. J. Biol., 2014, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 283-289
Poli, C. et al.
AYRES, M., AYRES JUNIOR, M., AYRES, DL. and SANTOS,
AAS., 2007. BioEstat 5.0: aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das
ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém: Sociedade Civil Mamirauá.
BALAZS, G., 1985. Impact of ocean debris on marine turtles:
entanglement and ingestion. In Proceedings of the Workshop on
the Fate and Impact of Marine Debris, 1984. Honolulu, Hawaii:
US Departament of Commerce. p. 387-429.
BAPTISTOTTE, C., THOMÉ, JCA. and BJORNDAL, KA., 2003.
Reproductive biology and conservation status of the loggerhead sea
turtle (Caretta caretta) in Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Chelonian
Conservation and Biology, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 1-7.
BJORNDAL, KA., 1999. Priorities for research in foraging habitats.
In ECKERT, KL., BJORNDAL, KA., ABREU-GROBOIS, FA.
and DONELLY, M. (Ed.). Research and management techniques
for the conservation of sea turtles. Washington: IUCN/SSC
MarineTurtle Specialist Group. p. 12-14. IUCN/SSC Marine
Turtle Specialist Group Publication, vol. 4.
BJORNDAL, KA., BOLTEN, AB. and LAGUEUX, CJ., 1994.
Ingestion of marine debris by juvenile sea turtles in coastal Florida
habitats. Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 154-158.
BOLTEN, AB., 2003. Variation in sea turtle life history patterns:
neritic vs. oceanic developmental stages. In LUTZ, PL., MUSICK,
JA. and WYNEKEN, J. (Ed.). The biology of sea turtles. Boca
Raton: CRC Press. vol. 2. p. 243-258.
BUGONI, L., KRAUSE, L. and VIRGÍNIA PETRY, MV., 2001.
Marine debris and human impacts on sea turtles in southern Brazil.
Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 42, no. 12, p. 1330-1334. http://
BUGONI, L., NEVES, TS., LEITE JUNIOR, NO., CARVALHO,
D., SALES, G., FURNESS, RW., STEIN, CE., PEPPES, FV.,
GIFFONI, BB. and MONTEIRO, DS., 2008. Potential bycatch
of seabirds and turtles in hook-and-line fisheries of the Itaipava
Fleet, Brazil. Fisheries Research, vol. 90, no. 1-3, p. 217-224.
CAMPBELL, LM., 2003. Contemporary culture, use, and
conservation of sea turtles. In LUTZ, PL., MUSICK, JA. and
WYNEKEN, J. (Ed.). The biology of sea turtles. Boca Raton:
CRC Press. vol. 2. p. 307-338.
CASALE, P., AFFRONTE, M., INSACCO, G., FREGGI, D.,
VALLINI, C., PINO D’ASTORE, P., BASSO, R., PAOLILLO,
G., ABBATE, G. and ARGANO, R., 2010. Sea turtle strandings
reveal high anthropogenic mortality in Italian waters. Aquatic
Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, vol. 20, no.
6, p. 611-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1133.
CASTILHOS, JC., COELHO, CA., ARGOLO, JF., SANTOS,
EAP., MARCOVALDI, MA., SANTOS, AS. and LOPEZ, M.,
2011. Avaliação do estado de conservação da tartaruga marinha
Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) no Brasil. Biodiversidade
Brasileira, vol. 1, n. 1, p. 28-36.
CHALOUPKA, M., WORK, T., BALAZS, G., MURAKAWA,
S. and MORRIS, R., 2008. Cause-specific temporal and spatial
trends in green sea turtle strandings in the Hawaiian Archipelago
(1982-2003). Marine Biology, vol. 154, no. 5, p. 887-898. http://
EPPERLY, SP., BRAUN, J., CHESTER, AJ., CROSS, FA .,
MERRINER, JV., TESTER, PA. and CHURCHILL, JH., 1996.
Beach strandings as an indicator of at-sea mortality of sea turtles.
Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 289-297.
FOLEY, AM., SCHROEDER, BA., REDLOW, AE., FICK-CHILD,
KJ. and TEAS, WG., 2005. Fibropapillomatosis in stranded
green turtles (Chelonia mydas) from the eastern United States
(1980-98): trends and associations with environmental factors.
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 29-41. http://dx.doi.
FOX, J., 2005. The R Commander: A Basic-Statistics Graphical
User Interface to R. Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 14, no.
9, p. 1-42.
GEORGE, RH., 1997. Health problems & diseases of sea turtles.
In LUTZ, PL., MUSICK, JA. and WYNEKEN, J. (Ed.). The
biology of sea turtles. Boca Raton: CRC Press. vol. 1. p. 363-387.
GROSSMAN, A., MENDONÇA, P., COSTA, MR. and BELLINI,
C., 2007. Morphometrics of the green turtle at the Atol das Rocas
Marine Biological Reserve, Brazil. Marine Turtle Newsletter,
vol. 118, p. 12-13.
GUEBERT-BARTHOLO, F., BARLETTA, M., COSTA, M. and
MONTEIRO-FILHO, E., 2011. Using gut contents to assess
foraging patterns of juvenile green turtles Chelonia mydas in
the Paranaguá; Estuary, Brazil. Endangered Species Research,
vol. 13, no. 2, p. 131-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esr00320.
HERBST, LH., 1994. Fibropapillomatosis of marine turtles.
Annual Review of Fish Diseases, vol. 4, p. 389-425. http://dx.doi.
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais
Renováveis – IBAMA, 2008. Monitoramento da atividade
pesqueira no litoral nordestino: Projeto Estatpesca. Tamandaré.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural
Resources – IUCN, 2011. The IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species. Available from: <http://www.iucnredlist.org>. Access
in: 23 Apr. 2014.
IVAR DO SUL, JA. and COSTA, MF., 2007. Marine debris
review for Latin America and the wider Caribbean region: from
the 1970s until now, and where do we go from here? Marine
Pollution Bulletin, vol. 54, no. 8, p. 1087-1104. http://dx.doi.
LIMA, EHSM., MELO, DMT. and BARATA, PCR., 2010.
Incidental capture of sea turtles by the lobster fishery of the
Ceará Coast, Brazil. Marine Turtle Newsletter, vol. 128, p. 16-19.
LUTCAVAGE, ME., PLOTKIN, P., WITHERINGTON, BE. and
LUTZ, PL., 1997. Human impacts on sea turtle survival. In LUTZ,
PL., MUSICK, JA. and WYNEKEN, J. (Ed.). The biology of sea
turtles. Boca Raton: CRC Press. vol. 1. p. 387-409.
MARCOVALDI, MA. and CHALOUPKA, M., 2007. Conservation
status of the loggerhead sea turtle in Brazil: an encouraging
outlook. Endangered Species Research, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 133-143.
MARCOVALDI, MA., LOPEZ, GG., SOARES, LS., BELINI,
C., SANTOS, AS. and LOPEZ, M., 2011. Avaliação do estado
de conservação da tartaruga marinha Eretmochelys imbricata
(Linnaeus, 1766) no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira, vol. 1,
n. 1, p. 20-27.
MARCOVALDI, MÂ. and DEI MARCOVALDI, GG., 1999.
Marine turtles of Brazil: the history and structure of Projeto
TAMAR-IBAMA. Biological Conservation, vol. 91, no. 1, p.
MARCOVALDI, MA., SALES, G., THOMÉ, JCA., SILVA,
ACCD., GALLO, BM., LIMA, EHSM., LIMA, EP. and BELLINI,
Braz. J. Biol., 2014, vol. 74, no. 2, p. 283-289 289
Patterns associated with turtle strandings
C., 2006. Sea turtles and fishery interactions in Brazil: identifying
and mitigating potential conflicts. Marine Turtle Newsletter,
vol. 112, p. 4-8.
MARTINS, M. and MOLINA, FB., 2008. Répteis: panorama
geral dos répteis ameaçados do Brasil. In: MACHADO, ABM.,
DRUMMOND, GM. and PAGLIA, AP. (Ed.). Livro vermelho da
fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção. Brasília: Ministério do
Meio Ambiente. vol. 2. p. 897.
MASCARENHAS, R., BATISTA, C P. , MOURA, IF. , CALDAS,
AR., COSTA-NETO, JM., VASCONCELOS, MQ., ROSA, SS.
and BARROS, TVS., 2008. Lixo marinho em área de reprodução
de tartarugas marinhas no Estado da Paraíba (Nordeste do Brasil).
Revista de Gestão Costeira Integrada, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 221-231.
MASCARENHAS, R. and IVERSON, PJ., 2008. Fibropapillomatosis
in stranded green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Paraiba State,
Northeastern Brazil: evidence of a Brazilian epizootic? Marine
Turtle Newsletter, vol. 120, p. 3-6.
MASCARENHAS, R., SANTOS, R. and ZEPPELINI, D., 2004.
Plastic debris ingestion by sea turtle in Paraíba, Brazil. Marine
Pollution Bulletin, vol. 49, no. 4, p. 354-355. http://dx.doi.
MASCARENHAS, R., SANTOS, R. and ZEPPELINI, D., 2005.
Stranded sea turtles on the coast of Paraíba, Brazil. Marine Turtle
Newsletter, vol. 107, p. 13-14.
MASCARENHAS, R., ZEPPELINI, D. and MOREIRA, VS.,
2003. Observations on sea turtles in the State of Paraíba, Brazil.
Marine Turtle Newsletter, vol. 101, p. 16-18.
MCCAULEY, SJ. and BJORNDAL, KA., 1999. Conservation
implications of dietary dilution from debris ingestion: sublethal
effects in post-hatchling loggerhead sea turtles. Conservation
Biology, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 925-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-
MROSOVSKY, N., RYAN, GD. and JAMES, MC., 2009.
Leatherback turtles: the menace of plastic. Marine Pollution
Bulletin, vol. 58, no. 2, p. 287-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
OLIVEIRA, PA., VENDEL, AL. and CRISPIM, MCB., 2009.
Caracterização socioeconômica e registro da percepção dos
pescadores de lagosta das praias do Seixas e Penha, João Pessoa,
PB. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 637-646.
PLOTKIN, P. and AMOS, AF., 1990. Effects of anthropogenic debris
on sea turtles in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. In Proceedings
of the Second International Conference on Marine Debris, 1990.
Honolulu, Hawaii: US Departament of Commerce. p. 736-743.
REIS, EC., MOURA, JF., LIMA, LM., RENNÓ, B. and SICILIANO,
S., 2010a. Evidence of migratory movements of olive ridley turtles
(Lepidochelys olivacea) along the Brazilian coast. Brazilian
Journal of Oceanography, vol. 58, no. 3, p. 255-259. http://
REIS, EC., PEREIRA, CS., RODRIGUES, DDP., SECCO, HKC.,
LIMA, LM., RENNÓ, B. and SICILIANO, S., 2010b. Condição
de saúde das tartarugas marinhas do litoral Centro-Norte do
Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: avaliação sobre a presença de
agentes bacterianos, fibropapilomatose e interação com resíduos
antropogênicos. Oecologia Australis, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 756-765.
REIS, EC., SILVEIRA, VVB. and SICILIANO, S., 2009. Records
of stranded sea turtles on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
Marine Biodiversity Records. vol. 2, e121.
RYA N , PG., MOORE, CJ., VAN FRANEKER, JA. and MOLONEY,
CL., 2009. Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the
marine environment. Philosophical transactions of the Royal
Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, vol. 364, no.
1526, p. 1999-2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0207.
SANTOS, AJB., FREIRE, EMX., BELLINI, C. and CORSO,
G., 2010. Body mass and the energy budget of gravid hawksbill
turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) during the nesting season.
Journal of Herpetology, vol. 44, no. 3, p. 352-359. http://dx.doi.
SANTOS, AS., SOARES, LS., MARCOVALDI, MA., MONTEIRO,
DS., GIFFONI, B. and ALMEIDA, AP., 2011. Avaliação do estado
de conservação da tartaruga marinha Caretta caretta Linnaeus,
1758 no Brasil. Biodiversidade Brasileira, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 3-11.
SILVA, ACCD., CASTILHOS, JC., LOPEZ, GG. and BARATA,
PCR., 2007. Nesting biology and conservation of the olive
ridley sea turtle (Lepidocheyls olivacea) in Brazil, 1991/1992 to
2002/2003. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the
United Kingdom, vol. 87, no. 4, p. 1047-1056.
TOURINHO, PS., IVAR DO SUL, JA. and FILLMANN, G., 2010.
Is marine debris ingestion still a problem for the coastal marine
biota of southern Brazil? Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 60, no.
3, p. 396-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.10.013.
VAN HOUTAN, KS., HARGROVE, SK. and BALAZS, GH.,
2010. Land use, macroalgae, and a tumor-forming disease in
marine turtles. PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 9, p. e12900. http://dx.doi.
WHITING, SD., LONG, JL. and COYNE, M., 2007. Migration
routes and foraging behaviour of olive ridley turtles Lepidochelys
olivacea in northern Australia. Endangered Species Research, vol.
3, no. 1, p. 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esr003001.
ZAR, JH., 1999. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.