Content uploaded by Sundeep Teki
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sundeep Teki on Aug 27, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
OPINION ARTICLE
published: 27 August 2014
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00155
Beta drives brain beats
Sundeep Teki1,2*
1Auditory Cognition Group, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK
2Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
*Correspondence: sundeep.teki@gmail.com
Edited by:
Federico Bermudez-Rattoni, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
Reviewed by:
Sacha Jennifer Van Albada, Research Center Jülich, Germany
Sidney A. Simon, Duke University, USA
Keywords: interval timing, beta oscillations, timing and time perception, sensorimotor integration, beat perception, beat-based timing, interval tuning
Beta-band oscillations in basal ganglia-
corticalloopshavebeenshowntobe
linked to motor function in both healthy
and pathological states (Brown, 2007;
Engel and Fries, 2010). As well as coordi-
nating motor activity, for instance when
we synchronize our movements to a beat,
the basal ganglia including the putamen
and the caudate are said to contain spe-
cialized timekeeping mechanisms for per-
ceptual timing (Buhusi and Meck, 2005).
However, the exact neurophysiological role
of beta-band oscillatory activity in the
striatum in interval timing is not yet
known.
In a recent study published in The
Journal of Neuroscience,Bartolo et al.
(2014) examined the role of beta oscilla-
tions in interval timing by directly record-
ing from the putamen in macaques during
a rhythmic synchronization task. In this
paradigm, a metronome is used to estab-
lish an isochronous beat (synchronization
phase) and the variability in the subse-
quent taps produced by the subject after
the metronome is turned off (continuation
phase) is evaluated as an index of inter-
nal timing behavior. Single-unit as well as
local field potential (LFP) activity in the
putamen in the beta and gamma range was
analyzed to determine the neural corre-
lates of interval timing.
They found that LFPs in the beta band
exhibit interval tuning and showed a pref-
erence for intervals with duration around
800 ms, similar to the preferred duration
observed in medial premotor cortex neu-
rons (Merchant et al., 2013). They also
reported tuning for serial order (or the
task phases): LFPs in the beta band showed
preferential tuning for the continuation
phase that relies on internal timing whilst
gamma band LFPs showed a bias toward
the synchronization phase that depends
on precise sensory coding. Another sig-
nificant result suggests that beta oscil-
lations are coherent at large electrode
distances within the putamen that may
reflect functional coordination across sev-
eral areas of the putamen, and possibly the
wider sensorimotor network for tempo-
ral processing. On the other hand, gamma
oscillations showed small coherence asso-
ciated most likely with local stimulus
processing.
The present study and previous work
from this group (Merchant et al., 2011,
2013)arebasedonanarduousmethod-
ological approach where macaques are
trained to perform complex tapping tasks
based on sequences of intervals rather
than single isolated intervals and disam-
biguating stimulus-related neural activity
from movement-related responses (Perez
et al., 2013). Natural acoustic signals con-
sist of sequences of time intervals, and it
is important not only to encode the dura-
tion of individual sounds but also the serial
order in which they are presented. The cur-
rent study is the first to show evidence of
both interval and serial order tuning in
such sequences in the beta-band responses
in the putamen.
The present study only addresses inter-
nal timing in regular sequences and it is
not yet known how temporal jitter would
affect the putaminal beta-band activity.
In irregular sequences, beta-band modula-
tion may remain the same or change as a
function of the amount of jitter. As natural
sounds are rarely presented in a tempo-
rally regular context, future work needs to
address how the brain perceives time in
irregular sequences. Related to this ques-
tion, Fujioka et al. (2012) used magne-
toencephalography to examine the nature
of beta-band responses in the auditory
cortex during passive listening to regular
and random sequences. They found that
the beta desynchronization after stimu-
lus onset did not vary with the regularity
of the stimulus, but the subsequent beta
rebound peaked just before the next sound
onset only for the regular stimuli.
Temporal processing in irregular
sequences has been shown to be prefer-
entially mediated by a network based in
the cerebellum whilst timing in regular
sequences is carried out by a striato-
frontal network (Teki et al., 2011). The
cerebellum is another key node of the
temporal processing network (Ivry and
Spencer, 2004) and recent theoretical
models emphasize the involvement of both
the cerebellum and the basal ganglia that
are inter-connected with each other and
the cortex through multiple synaptic path-
ways (Teki et al., 2012; Allman et al., 2014).
Fujioka et al. (2012) demonstrated beta-
band coherence between auditory and
motor-related areas including the cere-
bellum but it remains to be investigated
whether such functional coupling during
interval timing is driven by the cerebellum,
the basal ganglia, or by a different brain
area that influences activity in both these
core timing areas.
Bartolo et al. (2014) only briefly men-
tion predictive coding mechanisms in
bottom-up (synchronization phase) and
top-down (continuation phase) process-
ing. Bastos et al. (2012) recently proposed
a canonical microcircuit for predictive
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org August 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 155 |1
SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENC
E
Teki Beta drives brain beats
coding based on iterative message pass-
ing between bottom-up stimulus-driven
processing (in the gamma range) by
superficial cortical neurons and top-
down coding of predictive signals by
deep cortical cells (in the beta range).
A predictive model can be invoked in
the context of the present rhythmic syn-
chronization task where tapping to the
metronome during the synchronization
phase helps establish an internal model of
the timing between successive metronome
pulses and subsequent taps following the
removal of the metronome may be driven
by predictive signals. The findings of pref-
erential gamma modulation during the
synchronization phase and beta modula-
tion during the continuation phase ties in
with such a predictive coding framework.
A hierarchical model for predictive coding
may be anatomically realizable even locally
within the striatum where there is evidence
of prediction error coding by the caudate
nucleus and ventral striatum whilst the
putamen encodes the prediction (Haruno
and Kawato, 2006). This hypothesis is sup-
ported by functional magnetic resonance
imaging data showing that the putamen
is specifically involved in internal predic-
tion of beats rather than detection of beats
(Grahn and Rowe, 2013).
In summary, this stimulating work on
the role of putamen during internally
driven timing behavior significantly adds
to previous work by Merchant and col-
leagues based on recordings from medial
premotor cortex (Merchant et al., 2011,
2013). It emphasizes the role of endoge-
nous beta oscillations in the basal ganglia
as a principal feature of interval timing in
a regular, beat-based context. The study
underlines the importance of local electro-
physiological recordings in key areas of the
animal brain to inform models of inter-
val timing and rhythmic synchronization
in humans (Teki et al., 2012)aswell
as non-human primates (Merchant and
Honing, 2014).
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Sundeep Teki is supported by the
Wellcome Trust, UK.
REFERENCES
Allman, M., Teki, S., Griffiths, T. D., and Meck, W. H.
(2014). Properties of the internal clock: first- and
second-order principles of subjective time. Ann.
Rev. Psychol. 65, 743–771. doi: 10.1146/annurev-
psych-010213-115117
Bartolo, R., Prado, L., and Merchant, H. (2014).
Information processing in the primate basal gan-
glia during sensory-guided and internally driven
rhythmic tapping. J. Neurosci. 34, 3910–3923. doi:
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2679-13.2014
Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., Mangun,
G. R., Fries, P., and Friston, K. J. (2012).
Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding.
Neuro n 76, 695–711. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.
10.038
Brown, P. (2007). Abnormal oscillatory synchroniza-
tion in the motor system leads to motor impair-
ment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 656–664. doi:
10.1016/j.conb.2007.12.001
Buhusi, C. V., and Meck, W. H. (2005). What makes us
tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of inter-
val timing. Nat. Re v. Neurosci. 6, 755–765. doi:
10.1038/nrn1764
Engel, A., and Fries, P. (2010). Beta-band oscilla-
tions – signalling the status quo? Curr. Opin.
Neurobiol. 20, 156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.
02.015
Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Large, E. W., and Ross,
B. (2012). Internalized timing of isochronous
sounds is represented in neuromagnetic beta
oscillations. J. Neurosci. 32, 1791–1802. doi:
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4107-11.2012
Grahn, J. A., and Rowe, J. B. (2013). Finding and
feeling the musical beat: striatal dissociations
between detection and prediction of temporal reg-
ularity. Cereb. Cortex 23, 913–921. doi: 10.1093/
cercor/bhs083
Haruno, M., and Kawato, M. (2006). Different neu-
ral correlates of reward expectation and reward
expectation error in the putamen and caudate
nucleus during stimulus-action-reward associa-
tion learning. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 948–959. doi:
10.1152/jn.00382.2005
Ivry, R. B., and Spencer, R. M. (2004). The neural
representation of time. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14,
225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013
Merchant, H., and Honing, H. (2014). Are non-
human primates capable of rhythmic entrain-
ment? Evidence for the gradual audiomotor
evolution hypothesis. Front. Neurosci. 7:274. doi:
10.3389/fnins.2013.00274
Merchant, H., Perez, O., Zarco, W., and Gamez,
J. (2013). Interval tuning in the primate
medial premotor cortex as a general timing
mechanism. J. Neurosci. 33, 9082–9096. doi:
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5513-12.2013
Merchant, H., Zarco, W., Perez, O., Prado, L., and
Bartolo, R. (2011). Measuring time with different
neural chronometers during a synchronization-
continuation task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108,
19784–19789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112933108
Perez, O., Kass, R. E., and Merchant, H. (2013).
Trial time warping to discriminate stimulus-
related from movement-related neural activ-
ity. J. Neurosci. Methods 212, 203–210. doi:
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.10.019
Teki, S., Grube, M., and Griffiths, T. D. (2012).
A unified model of time perception accounts
for duration-based and beat-based timing
mechanisms. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 5:90. doi:
10.3389/fnint.2011.00090
Teki, S., Grube, M., Kumar, S., and Griffiths, T. D.
(2011). Distinct neural substrates of duration-
based and beat-based auditory timing. J. Neurosci.
31, 164–171. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3788-
10.2011
Conflict of Interest Statement: The author declares
that the research was conducted in the absence of any
commercial or financial relationships that could be
construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Received: 12 June 2014; accepted: 08 August 2014;
published online: 27 August 2014.
Citation: Teki S (2014) Beta drives brain beats. Front.
Syst. Neurosci. 8:155. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00155
This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in
Systems Neuroscience.
Copyright © 2014 Teki. This is an open-access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or
reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the
original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in accor-
dance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribu-
tion or reproduction is permitted which does not comply
with these terms.
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org August 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 155 |2