ArticlePDF Available

Linking Franchise Success with Economic Growth and Net Job Creation

A white paper by Chad Moutray
with contributions from:
Darrell Johnson
John Reynolds
Jeffrey Rosensweig
For the
International Franchise Association
1501 K Street, NW, Suite 350
Washington, DC 20005
Released April 2011
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1!
Challenges in the Current Economic Environment ........................................................................ 2!
Entrepreneurship and Net Job Creation .......................................................................................... 6!
The Franchise Business Model Provides Scaling Advantages and Generates Jobs ....................... 8!
Franchising Opportunities and Global Competition ..................................................................... 10!
Concluding Remarks ..................................................................................................................... 11!
References ..................................................................................................................................... 13!
Appendix A: What is a Franchise Business? ................................................................................ 15!
Franchising in the U.S. Economy ............................................................................................. 15!
Appendix B: Credit Access Survey Responses ............................................................................ 18!
Franchisors ................................................................................................................................ 18!
Franchisees ................................................................................................................................ 19!
– 1 –
Linking Franchise Success with Economic Growth and Net Job Creation
A white paper by Chad Moutray, with contributions from Darrell Johnson,
John Reynolds, and Jeffrey Rosensweig1
Americans especially in these challenging economic times when net job creation is at a
premium – appreciate the entrepreneur. Part of this is the mystique of the small business owner and
the role that mom-and-pop establishments play in communities. But it is also due to the tremendous
impact that they have on our local, regional, and national economies. Research shows that firms
with less than 500 employees account for half of the nation’s real gross domestic product (GDP),
employ half of the private sector workforce, and generate around 65 percent of the net new jobs
created in the economy since 1993.2
Franchised businesses are an essential segment of the larger small business population.3 In
2007, franchised small businesses were directly responsible for 7.76 million and 1.37 million jobs,
respectively, in business format and product distribution franchises. This totals to 9.1 million jobs,
or 6.2 percent of the total nonfarm, private sector employment.4 To illustrate its importance,
franchise employment is roughly equivalent to the number of jobs in durable goods manufacturing,
and it exceeds the total employment of such major industries as finance and insurance, real estate
and rental and leasing, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, nondurable goods
manufacturing, and information.5 When indirect employment is included, nearly 18 million
Americans are impacted by franchising with overall output of $2.1 trillion stemming from
franchising amounting to 9.0 percent of private, nonfarm output.6
Entrepreneurs of all sizes will be vital to our economic recovery. While there have been
recent positive signs of economic growth, the employment picture remains weak. Small business
owners – including franchises – continue to cite access to capital problems as a concern. This paper
will discuss many of the recent challenges faced by small business owners, ranging from cyclical
worries about sales to the credit struggles which were exacerbated by the unique sources of this
particular economic downturn.
Most importantly, however, this paper will highlight how certain entrepreneurial ventures
will propel our economy forward in the years to come, providing new sources of economic vitality
and employment to our increasingly global marketplace. These high-impact businesses are sources
1 Chad Moutray, who served as the chief economist and director of economic research for the U.S. Small Business Administration’s
Office of Advocacy from 2002 to 2010, is the president of Pinchfield Consulting & Analytics, LLC. Darrell Johnson is president and
the chief executive officer of FRANdata and serves on the board of directors of the International Franchise Association (IFA). John
Reynolds serves as the president of the IFA Educational Foundation. Jeffrey Rosensweig, an associate professor of finance, is the
director of the Global Perspectives Program at Emory University. The authors also wish to thank Steven Caldeira, William Hall,
Andrew Lyon, Beth Solomon, and Steven Wilber for their helpful comments. The opinions expressed in this white paper are those of
the authors and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of the institutions listed above.
2 SBA (2011), p. 1.
3 For more information on franchising, including the different types, see Appendix A.
4 PwC (2011), p. I-6. Note that much of the analysis in this white paper is for business format franchises only.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid., p. I-7.
– 2 –
of innovation and growth, and by scaling up rapidly, they provide a firm foundation for future
stability (especially for their workers and local economies) and capture our collective attention.
These firms span a wide variety of industries and are geographically dispersed around the county.7
Small franchised businesses are an integral component of the high-impact firm landscape, as this
write-up will show. The franchising business model provides the necessary resources for small
business owners to scale quickly and achieve long-term success.
The U.S. economy grew 3.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2010, with real GDP also
increasing 2.8 percent last year, lead by strong growth in personal consumption and net exports.
After a rough economic environment the past few years, stronger economic data is a welcome sign.
Despite the fact that the recession officially ended in June 2009,8 economic activity has been
plagued by uncertainty and continued weakness, particularly in the labor market. More recently,
though, economists have become more optimistic about growth for this year, with demand for
goods and services rising, higher capital spending, and positive hiring plans over the coming
months.9 Real GDP is expected to increase by over 3 percent in 2011.10
With that said, there are still a number of challenges for small businesses owners. First and
foremost, entrepreneurs remain cautiously optimistic about a stronger economic climate. Poor sales
remain a major concern for all small businesses, including franchised ones.11 While small business
owners have higher expectations about hiring, capital spending, and sales projections than in
previous surveys, economic activity is still below where it should be,12 and this newer optimism
still needs to translate into actual hiring and spending activity.
7 The 2007 Survey of Business Owners from the U.S. Census Bureau received responses from 295 industries, with franchise businesses accounting
for 10.5 percent of businesses with paid employees in those industries. For more information, see
8 The National Bureau of Economic Research has dated the last recession, which began on December 2007, to have ended on June 2009. See
9 NABE (2011).
10 A number of sources suggest this range for GDP growth this year, including the Congressional Budget Office (3.1%), the Federal Reserve (3.4 to
3.9%), Kiplinger’s (3.25%), the Office of Management and Budget (3.1%), the National Association for Business Economics (3.3%), the Survey of
Professional Forecasters (3.2%), the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (3.2%), and the Wall Street Journal (3.5%).
11 Dunkelberg and Wade (2011), p. 20, and Reynolds (2011a), p. 71.
12 Joel Popkin and Company (2003) suggests that small businesses remain in a recession whenever the NFIB optimism index falls below 100. This
measure has remained below 100 since November 2006, bottoming out at 81 in March 2009. It is currently at 94.5 (February 2011).
– 3 –
Figure 1: Growth in Employment for Franchise Establishments and All Business Establishments, 2001-2011
Source: PwC (2008, 2011a, b); Inforum.
Note: The annual growth rates for all businesses include all private sector businesses in the United States and are not limited to those
in franchise business format lines.
Sluggish employment growth will be a challenge for some time. Even with positive growth
over much of the past year, there remain 7.5 million nonfarm payroll jobs fewer today than at the
end of 2007, and the unemployment rate remains around 9 percent. With stubbornly high
unemployment, many policymakers have recognized the importance of small businesses for net job
creation as a means of closing the “jobs deficit.” On September 27, 2010, the President signed the
Small Business Jobs Act, which increased SBA lending limits, included new tax provisions,
promoted exporting, and established a new small business lending fund.13 Indeed, much of the
impetus for the legislation and other policy moves has been to spur new hiring among small
businesses, which traditionally have begun hiring sooner than their larger counterparts post-
recession, but have not done so this time.
Much like the larger small business population, franchised businesses can be seen as engines
of employment growth, especially in strong economic times. Data from the franchise economic
impact studies conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers suggests that total employment in business
format franchised establishments grew at an average annual rate of 3.6 percent between 2001 and
2005 (Figure 1). Such strong growth coming out of the recession of 2001 contrasts with the growth
for all businesses, which averaged 0.3 percent per year over the four year period. More recent
growth, given the recession, has been slower but still indicates a faster growth rate for franchised
small businesses. Figure 1 shows the average annual employment growth rates from 2007 to 2011.
While all businesses declined rapidly during the depth of the recession in 2007 and 2008, franchised
establishments recovered faster and have outpaced all businesses as a whole over the time period.
Between 2010 and 2011, franchise employment is expected to grow 2.5 percent, compared to a 1.7
percent increase for all businesses. This is mirrored somewhat in the growth in output from
franchise establishments, which is shown in Figure 2, over the same time period. Franchise
13 See
0.0% 0.4%
2001-2005 2005-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Franchised Businesses All Businesses
– 4 –
business output is expected to grow 4.7 percent between 2010 and 2011; whereas, the output from
all businesses should increase 4.0 percent.
Given these statistics, if we are to close the “jobs deficit,” franchising must be part of the
discussion. Ideally, franchise establishments would return to the growth rates experienced earlier in
the decade. That means, of course, that policymakers must address some of the challenges that
franchisors and franchisees are facing, such as access to credit, which are dampening overall
establishment and employment growth.. This is perhaps best shown in Figure 2, which shows the
average annual growth rates in output for franchise and all businesses between 2001 and 2011. The
more recent growth rates are well below what was experienced between 2001 and 2005, where
franchise establishments averaged output growth of 8.5 percent and the output from all businesses
rose 5.9 percent each year.
Figure 2: Growth in Output from Franchise Establishments and All Business Establishments, 2001-2011
Source: PwC (2008, 2011a, b); Inforum.
Note: The annual growth rates for all businesses include all private sector businesses in the United States and are not limited to those
in franchise business format lines.
The International Franchise Association has referred to the lack of credit for its members as
its “number one member issue” and one that is restraining franchised businesses’ ability to grow.14
In fact, 39 percent of franchisors report in a March 2011 survey that more than half of their existing
or prospective franchisees have been unable to obtain necessary financing. Moreover, 60 percent of
franchisors report no improvement in credit access in recent months, which is slightly better than
the 65 percent reported in the November 2010 survey.15 In that survey, 42 percent of franchisors
and 30 percent of franchisees stated that credit access issues significantly impacted their ability to
14Reynolds (2011a), pp. 70-71.
15Reynolds (2011b).
5.9% 5.7%
4.3% 4.0%
2001-2005 2005-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Franchised Businesses
All Businesses
– 5 –
grow their businesses in 2010.16 To help to illustrate how credit is impacting their business,
Appendix B shows some of the responses from franchisors and franchisees to the March 2011
Financing and credit, of course, are crucial elements to any business, and the recession and
its continued aftermath have been painful for many. This experience is different from past
recessions. Small business financing and credit have been constrained, both by tougher standards
and by structural impediments due to the financial and housing market roots of the economic crisis.
In fact, small business loans outstanding fell 6.2 percent between 2009 and 2010,17 and the Federal
Reserve Board’s Senior Loan Officer Survey has reflected tighter commercial and industrial
lending standards since 2007 and also weakened demand for lending overall. These figures were
even more pronounced in the early months of 2009. While more recent surveys have shown
improvement, the vast majority of senior officers reported no change in standards or demand.18
Figure 3: Effect of Projected Lending Shortfall, 2011
Source: FRANdata (2011).
As a result of more restrictive lending conditions, small franchised businesses are competing
in a much tougher environment for capital. FRANdata (2011) estimates that there will be a demand
for over 41,000 franchise transactions this year, which is up 12 percent from 2010.19 Despite the
uptick in demand, the report suggests that there will be a lending shortfall of more than $2 billion,
which banks and the SBA may not be able to meet (Figure 3). This is not a trivial amount, as it
represents nearly 8,000 franchise transactions. Under such assumptions, the lending shortfall would
result in a loss of 82,334 jobs and $10.7 billion in economic output.20 Therefore, the access to
credit challenge is significantly impacting franchised small businesses’ ability to grow this
16 Ibid.
17 Haynes and Williams (2011), p. 3.
18 See
19 p. 11.
20 pp. 18-21.
15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000
Number of Unit Transactions
Demand Requirement
Unit Ouput
Supply of Funds
– 6 –
Small business lending challenges are being exacerbated by declining real estate values,
limiting the ability of many owners to borrow. A recent NFIB survey found that nearly one-third of
respondents felt that access to credit had become more difficult in the past twelve months. Among
those who noted credit concerns, 29 percent of them cited poor sales and 25 percent mentioned
business uncertainties as their biggest finance problem.21 Moreover, there were 15 percent of
owners who did not borrow because they did not think that their loan application would be
approved the so-called “discouraged borrower.”22 Depressed housing prices, low credit scores,
and location (particularly in the most economically depressed areas) appear to influence one’s
ability to access credit, and when a small business approaches more than three lending institutions
unsuccessfully, their chances of obtaining credit falls dramatically.23
Small business owners also cite public policy and regulatory uncertainty as a concern, with
new rules being drafted on health care, financial regulation, occupational safety, and the
environment, among others. Each year, the compliance cost for new regulations is estimated at
$1.75 trillion, with smaller firms with less than 20 employees paying 36 percent more in
compliance costs per employee than their larger counterparts.24 Recognizing that the rulemaking
process can be burdensome for all businesses – especially small ones – the President recently
signed Executive Order 13563 which instructed agencies to adopt rules with the least burdensome
approaches, taking into consideration the benefits of the regulations and the best available scientific
evidence. This directive also instructed federal agencies to review existing regulations.25
The economic downturn has highlighted the need for new economic engines of growth.
Given the loss of over 7 million jobs, many policymakers have looked toward entrepreneurship as a
mechanism for generating new employment, innovation, and competitiveness. Most Americans, in
fact, see business creation and entrepreneurship as the best way of growing the economy and
creating new jobs, and they suggest that government should do more to encourage individuals to
start their own businesses.26 This view is shared by politicians of both parties, all of whom espouse
the belief that “Main Street” businesses benefit our overall economy. President Obama recently
said the following on the importance of the entrepreneur:
Entrepreneurs embody the promise of America: the belief that if you have a good
idea and are willing to work hard and see it through, you can succeed in this country.
And in fulfilling this promise, entrepreneurs also play a critical role in expanding our
economy and creating jobs.27
21 Dennis (2011), p. 5.
22 Ibid., p. 1.
23 Ibid.
24 Crain and Crain (2010), p. 7.
25 See
26 Schoen (2009).
27 See
– 7 –
The White House has also introduced a new organization, the Startup America Partnership, to help
promote entrepreneurship.28
Research on the role that small businesses play in net job creation is the main impetus
behind these initiatives. The notion that small businesses generate most of the net new jobs has
become commonplace29 and part of the lexicon of speechwriters everywhere. Behind this statistic
is a consistent theme: new ventures are essential in our dynamic economy to maintain our
competitiveness, to generate new economic growth, and to produce new employment.
The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation has said that start-ups, most notably those firms
that are less than five years old, are the key to net job creation, and public policy should therefore
focus on the entrepreneur.30 They find that start-ups have been the primary drivers of net
employment changes since 1977. Indeed, some economists argue that the size of the business is
really not the contributing factor; instead, studies should focus more analysis on the age of the firm.
Young startups account for 3 percent of the total employment in the country but represent 20
percent of the gross job creation.31 While new firms shed employment rapidly, with 40 percent of
the jobs initially created at startup lost after five years, these young firms tend to grow more rapidly
than old firms and generate more net new employment overall.32 Much of this is a function of the
fact that young firms represent such a large proportion of all businesses at any given time, building
in a structural advantage for newer firms to generate more net new jobs.33
Other studies show that age of the firm is more indicative of growth than the size of the
firm, with more mature businesses being the driving force. High-impact firms, according to one
recent study, are those that have doubled their sales and had their employment growth quantifier at
least double over the most recent four-year period.34 This research has found that the average age
of a high-impact firm was 25 years old between 2002 and 2006, and perhaps surprisingly, these
firms were in every major industry and were located across the country in every state, region, and
county.35 Identifying and cultivating these firms, which change over time, and allowing them to
flourish is the key.
In order for a business to succeed and generate new employment, though, it must be able to
navigate a difficult competitive landscape and to scale up to effectively meet growing demand.
This is often difficult. Firms which last four years have often passed a significant threshold in their
survivability.36 For those businesses that are successful, transitioning to a “second stage” of their
lifecycle brings tough financial, management, and logistical challenges which many novice
entrepreneurs are not ready to tackle. Policies geared toward start-ups are not as helpful, and
therefore, new initiatives might need to be undertaken to nurture this small but economically
vibrant group of businesses. Florida provides an excellent example and test case for this approach,
as its legislature in 2009 created an Economic Gardening Institute at the University of Central
28 See
29 Headd (2010).
30 Stangler and Litan (2009) and Kane (2010).
31 Haltiwanger, Jarmin, and Miranda (2010), p. 31.
32 Ibid., p. 30.
33 Stangler and Kedrosky (2010).
34 Acs, Parsons, and Tracy (2008), p. 17.
35 Ibid., pp. 1-2.
36 Knaup and Piazza (2007), p. 3.
– 8 –
Florida that provides counseling and other services to fast-growing businesses.37 Similarly, the
Kauffman Laboratories for Enterprise Creation recruits and provides technical support to top
entrepreneurs to help make their ventures successful.38
Franchising provides another method of scaling up quickly, providing new entrepreneurs
with proven techniques and tools to move to the “second stage” with the right tools. Research, for
instance, has shown that franchising can enhance a firm’s survival and growth, especially for those
franchises that grow most rapidly in their early years.39 Indeed, a franchisors’ growth is highly
dependent on its prior performance,40 and as such, it is important to establish oneself at the start-up
phase with strong resources and an orientation for success. When doing so, the franchise business
model can provide an important mechanism for quick scalability and, under the right circumstances,
to outperform their non-franchise counterparts. A few past studies have found this to be the case.
Spinelli, Birley, and Leleux (2003) observed that U.S. public franchises bested the Standard &
Poors 500 returns in nine of the ten years that they studied, and Aliouche and Schlentrich (2005)
provided evidence that franchised restaurants had greater market value than those which were not
Earlier in the paper, it was suggested that franchised establishments need to be part of the
discussion when it comes to overall employment and output growth in the U.S. While these data
are not perfect comparisons, it does provide some clues – especially in terms of relative growth
rates – about the importance of franchising as a sector in generating net new jobs. Indeed, it
suggests that there might have been some “high-impact” franchises during this period. In most of
the sectors, franchise establishments had higher or comparable employment growth with their non-
franchised peers.41
One of the primary findings from Figure 1 is that even during the recent economic downturn
and period of tight credit, employment growth in small franchised establishments has outstripped
the growth of all other businesses. This helps to support the claim that franchising is relatively
resilient, both in good and bad economic times, at generating jobs and output (Figure 2). In the
good times, when credit is flowing and the economy is booming, franchising can be a tremendous
locomotive for job creation. Yet, we also know that franchisors and franchisees have said that the
lack of credit has hurt their ability to grow their businesses. Figures 1 and 2 also show us this, as
tight credit conditions stalled both job and output growth between 2007 and 2009.
37 See
38 See
39 Michael (2002).
40 Castrogiovanni and Justis (2002).
41 One possible extension to this analysis would be to identify high-impact franchised businesses and examine their contributions to
overall economic activity relative to their non-franchised peers. Given the evidence that franchising often outperforms other
businesses in terms of growth, this could be quite informative.
– 9 –
Figure 4: Projected Franchise Employment Growth under Different Credit Scenarios, 2007-2017
(Cumulative Effects on Direct and Indirect Employment from Business Format Franchises, in million
Source: Authors’ calculations using data from PwC (2008, 2011a, b).
Looking ahead, franchising should be part of any discussion on employment and overall
economic growth, especially in light of the before-mentioned “jobs deficit.” Figure 4 illustrates this
point by showing the potential growth in franchising under different scenarios through 2017, or ten
years beyond the Economic Census data. Under the best case scenario, we will assume that credit
is readily available, with franchisors and franchisees lending needs being fully met. The other
scenario, which is more pessimistic, is one where credit conditions are tight. With each successive
year, we can see the cumulative impacts of growth under each scenario.
Both historical and current data are used to derive the two scenario forecasts in Figure 4.
Suffice it to say that these are rough estimates, both because these are such uncertain economic
times and because only limited data exist on annual employment in franchising. For both scenarios,
estimates for employment growth from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) were used for 2011
to 2017. 42 For the best case scenario, where credit is available and the business conditions are
favorable, we have consistent data for franchise job growth from 2001 to 2005. During this period,
job growth in franchising outstripped the growth in total U.S. jobs by 3.3 percent each year. If we
were to apply a similar “premium” to the EIU forecasts for 2011 to 2017, direct and indirect
employment in business format franchising would grow by over 5 million.
42 EIU has the following estimates for employment growth: 1.9 percent (2012), 1.4 percent (2013), and 1.3 percent (2014 to 2017).
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Worst case scenario Best case scenario
Gap of 2.14
million jobs
In contrast, the more recent experience of tight credit (2007 to 2011) illustrates a period
when credit conditions were less favorable. The resiliency of franchising, however, enabled
franchised small businesses to grow faster, or shrink less, than other U.S. businesses. During this
time span, franchising grew 1.3 percent better than other firms on average each year. To continue
our example, under the worst case scenario if we were to add a 1.3 percent “premium” to the EIU
estimates for employment growth between 2011 and 2017, overall direct and indirect franchise
employment in business format franchising would grow by almost 3 million.
In sum, the franchising industry has had and will continue to be a significant contributor to
job creation. With a positive business environment, which includes access to credit but might also
encompass a favorable tax and regulatory climate and a growing economy, small franchise
establishments can help to close the “job gap” that currently exists due to the severity of the 2007-
2009 economic recession. Franchises alone, assuming the best scenario presented above, could
help close the gap by adding over 2 million jobs more than if the economic environment over the
next six years is closer to the tight credit scenario. This simulated exercise demonstrates the true
potential of franchising as an economic engine under ideal circumstances, and it highlights the need
for greater credit access to franchisors and franchisees moving forward.
Another avenue for job creation and economic growth is through increased trade. The
President has said that he wants to double U.S. exports by 2015, creating the National Export
Initiative (NEI) by Executive Order 13534.43 To achieve the goal of exporting $3.1 trillion of
goods and services by 2015, the Administration plans to focus on five areas:
Improving overall trade promotion of U.S. goods and services abroad
Increasing access to export financing, especially for small businesses
Removing barriers to trade
Enforcing existing trade rules
Promoting “strong, sustainable, and balanced growth” globally
Some of these components are more challenging than others, but highlighting the importance of this
initiative, it was singled out in the FY 2012 budget for continued financial support44 and a large
number of Cabinet-level officials and their staffs have been devoted to this cause for much of the
past year.
International markets provide domestic franchisors with tremendous opportunities for
growth. While GDP is expected to grow around 2.5 percent in the advanced economies – including
the United States – this year, economic growth in emerging markets is forecast to expand around
6.5 percent.45 In promoting the NEI, the U.S. Department of Commerce writes the following:
95 percent of the world’s customers lie outside the United States; we ignore them at our
peril. Tapping into customers in fast-growing markets abroad and in our traditional markets
is crucial to putting the United States’ own economy on a solid footing – and generating the
43 See
44 See
45 IMF (2011), p. 2.
demand needed to put Americans back to work. We cannot return to an economy that is
driven by borrowing and consumption. To maintain robust growth, the world will need to
rely less on U.S. consumption – and we will need to sell more to the rest of the world.46
Indeed, franchised small businesses have been doing just that, providing new franchisee
opportunities abroad and drivers of new employment and growth for franchisors.
Recently, the Subway sandwich chain overtook McDonald’s as the world’s largest
restaurant chain in terms of number of units, with a lot of press attention.47 (McDonald’s still
dominates all restaurants when it comes to sales revenue.) In reading through these stories, though,
it is clear that Subway’s success stems from its growth overseas. While just over 70 percent of its
stores operate in the United States, its current growth and long-term expansion plans lay elsewhere,
particularly in Asia, where it will open its 1,000th location, and other emerging markets. It is not
alone, according to the Wall Street Journal. “Starbucks Corp. recently said it plans to triple its
number of outlets in China, for example. Dunkin’ Brands Inc., parent of Dunkin’ Donuts and
Baskin-Robbins, plans to open thousands of new outlets in China in coming years as well as its first
stores in Vietnam in the next 18 months.”48
Clearly, the franchise model provides scalability and growth globally, which helps to create
high-paying jobs in the U.S., particularly at the franchisor’s headquarters. Indeed, international
expansion often requires highly-skilled professionals who are capable of navigating complex
country-by-country legal and regulatory frameworks and who can help to custom tailor a
company’s product or service to cater to local tastes.
Further, the expansion of U.S. franchise businesses abroad can directly help the U.S.
international balance of payments. This is a powerful benefit because the U.S. has run trade deficits
for the past three decades. Payments from franchisees abroad flow into the U.S. as they pay their
royalties to U.S. franchisors. Of course, such royalty payments increase with a growing global
economy, and for U.S. franchisors to be able to pursue international opportunities, they must have
the resources domestically – readily-available credit access and favorable business conditions – to
make such global expansions a reality.
Franchised small businesses are an integral part of the economy, generating employment
and output at rates faster than all other businesses. Indeed, the franchise business model provides
key resources to entrepreneurs wishing to open their own establishments, and it allows for these
business owners to scale up quickly. Such advantages help franchisees and franchisors weather
even difficult times. This year, business format franchise output is expected to grow 4.7 percent,
with employment up 2.5 percent, outpacing all other businesses by 0.7 percent and 0.8 percent,
respectively. Even during the recession of 2007-2009, franchised businesses weathered the
downtown better than many other businesses. For that reason, it will be important for policymakers
to make franchising part of the discussion when pursuing solutions to grow this economy.
46 U.S. Department of Commerce (2010), p. 1.
47 See
48 Ibid.
Under the right business conditions, franchises should flourish. If we have the right mix of
tax and regulatory policies, a growing economy, and sufficient credit for both franchisees and
franchisors, franchise employment could grow substantially over the course of the next few years.
However, if these conditions are not met, franchises will not be able to grow as rapidly, nor will any
small business. More recent experiences, for instance, bear this out. Growth in employment and
output since 2007, when credit conditions have become tighter, is far below what it was between
2001 and 2005. If we could return to those earlier growth rates, we could help to close the “jobs
gap” by employing more Americans.
Of course, challenges continue to prevent that from happening. Access to credit, while
improved from its recessionary lows, is still a problem for many business owners. In a recent
survey, 39 percent of franchisors suggested that at least half of their existing or prospective
franchisees had been unable to obtain necessary financing. Moreover, FRANdata estimates that
there will be a $2 billion shortfall in lending to franchises in 2011, with the demand for loans
exceeding the willingness of banks and other financial institutions to supply them.
It is for this reason that the International Franchise Association has deemed “access to
credit” as its number one issue. FRANdata (2009) found that $1 million in lending to franchised
businesses creates or sustains an estimated 40 jobs and generates an estimated $4.2 million in
economic output. Increasing capital flow to the franchising sector can have a very positive impact
on the pace of the U.S. economic recovery. Likewise, constrained capital flow will have a negative
impact and will slow the rate of the economic recovery. While government has introduced
innovative, and often temporary, solutions to help rectify this problem, the franchise community
should work on long-term structural solutions in collaboration with its lending and other partners to
ensure adequate business capital moving forward.
In closing, this paper has helped to establish the important role that franchises play in the
American economy. Despite the economic challenges of the past few years, business owners are
more optimistic this year than last, and franchising remains a viable option for many entrepreneurs
wishing to pursue the “American Dream.” These franchised small businesses will offer innovative
new products and services to consumers. Many of these entrepreneurs will also open up new
opportunities for growth by pursuing new markets overseas. Undoubtedly, the future of franchising
looks bright, especially if the business environment provides a fertile ground for these firms to
prosper and grow.
Acs, Zoltan, William Parsons, and Spencer Tracy. June 2008. High-Impact Firms: Gazelles Revisited. Washington,
DC: U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.
Aliouche, E. Hachemi and Udo Schlentrich. 2005. “Does Franchising Create Value? An Analysis of the Financial
Performance of U.S. Public Restaurant Firms.” Manchester, NH: Southern New Hampshire University Working
Paper Series, 2005-02. (See
Beshel, Barbara. 2010. An Introduction to Franchising. Washington, DC: International Franchise Association
Education Foundation. (See
Castrogiovanni, Gary J. and Robert T. Justis. April 2002. “Strategic and Contextual Influences on Firm Growth: An
Empirical Study of Franchisors.” Journal of Small Business Management. 40(2), 98-108.
Crain, Nicole V. and W. Mark Crain. September 2010. The Impact of Regulatory Costs on Small Firms. Washington,
DC: U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.
Dennis, William J., Jr. February 2011. Small Business and Credit Access. Washington, DC: National Federation of
Independent Business (NFIB). (See
Dunkelberg, William C. and Holly Wade. January 2011. NFIB Small Business Economic Trends. Washington, DC:
National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).
FRANdata. December 2009. Small Business Lending Matrix and Analysis: The Impact of the Credit Crisis on the
Francise Sector. Washington, DC: International Franchise Association. (See
______. March 2011. Small Business Lending Matrix and Analysis: The Impact of the Credit Crisis on the Franchise
Sector. Washington, DC: International Franchise Association. (See
Haltiwanger, John, Ron S. Jarmin, and Javier Miranda. August 2010. Who Creates Jobs? Small vs. Large vs. Young.
Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies.
Haynes, George and Victoria Williams. February 2011. Small Business Lending in the United States, 2009-2010.
Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.
Headd, Brian. March 2010. An Analysis of Small Businesses and Jobs. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Advocacy. (See
International Monetary Fund (IMF). January 2011. World Economic Outlook Update. Washington, DC. (See
Joel Popkin and Company. July 2003. Small Business During the Business Cycle. Washington, DC: U.S. Small
Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. (See
Kane, Tim. July 2010. The Importance of Startups in Job Creation and Job Destruction. Kansas City, MO: Ewing
Marion Kauffman Foundation.
Knaup, Amy E. and Merissa C. Piazza. September 2007. “Business Employment Dynamics Data: Survival and
Longevity, II.” Monthly Labor Review. 130(9), 3-10. (See
Michael, Steven C. 2002. “Can a Franchise Chain Coordinate?” Journal of Business Venturing. 17(4), 325-341.
National Association for Business Economics (NABE). January 2011. NABE Industry Survey. Washington, DC.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). February 2008. The Economic Impact of Franchised Businesses: Volume 2.
Washington, DC: International Franchise Association Education Foundation. (See
______. February 2011 (b). The Economic Impact of Franchised Businesses: Volume III, Results for 2007.
Washington, DC: International Franchise Association Education Foundation.
______. January 2011 (a). Franchise Business Economic Outlook: 2011. Washington, DC: International Franchise
Association Education Foundation. (See
Reynolds, John R. January 2011. “Franchise Executives View Year Ahead with Equal Dose of Optimism and
Concern.” Franchising World. 70-72.
______. March 2011 (b). IFA Credit Access Survey. Washington, DC: International Franchise Association Education
Foundation. (See
Schoen, Douglas. March 2009. Kauffman Poll: Entrepreneurship and American Recovery. Kansas City, MO: Ewing
Marion Kauffman Foundation. (See
Spinelli, Stephen, Jr., Sue Birley, and Benoit Leleux. Spring 2003. “An Analysis of Shareholder Return in Public
Franchisor Companies.” The Journal of Private Equity. 6(3), 56-67.
Stangler, Dane and Paul Kedrosky. September 2010. Neutralism and Entrepreneurship: The Structural Dynamics of
Startups, Young Firms, and Job Creation. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
Stangler, Dane and Robert E. Litan. November 2009. Where Will the Jobs Come From? Kansas City, MO: Ewing
Marion Kauffman Foundation.
U.S. Department of Commerce. September 2010. Report to the President on the National Export Initiative: The
Export Promotion Cabinet’s Plan for Doubling U.S. Exports in Five Years. Washington, DC: Trade Promotion
Coordinating Committee (TPCC) Secretariat. (See
U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). January 2011. Frequently Asked Questions. Washington, DC: Office of
Advocacy. (See
When an individual decides to go into business for themselves, franchising can be an
attractive option. Entrepreneurship requires major investments in time, resources, and finances, and
not all ventures are successful. In fact, only 44 percent of new establishments survive four years,
with 31 percent surviving to year seven.49 Therefore, franchising provides a way of being your own
business with proven products and methods, start-up and operating assistance, increased purchasing
power, and regional and national marketing support.50 This should enhance one’s ability to success,
as shown elsewhere in this paper. This section highlights the importance of franchising to the U.S.
economy and describes the different types of franchised businesses.
Franchising in the U.S. Economy
According to U.S. Census Bureau data, as adjusted by PwC to include nonemployer
establishments based on data from other government agencies including the U.S. Bureau of
Economic Analysis, franchised businesses represented 2.8 percent of all non-farm business
establishments in 2007, operating 828,138 establishments. These businesses were directly
responsible for over 9.1 million jobs and $468.5 billion of GDP.51 This, of course, is only part of
the story, as there are also multiplier effects to franchised establishments. It is estimated that, when
accounting for these direct and indirect impacts, franchising accounts for 9.7 percent of nonfarm
GDP and contributes 17.4 million nonfarm payroll jobs.52
These businesses spanned a wide variety of industries; although, restaurants accounted for
nearly half of all employment in business format franchises (Figure A-1). Business format
franchises are the most common type of franchise, with franchisees following standardized
operating guidelines as established by the franchisor while also benefiting from its established sales
and marketing resources.53 In this category, quick service restaurants comprised 37.1 percent of
total employment, the largest of any group, followed by full-service restaurants with 12.7 percent
and business services with 12.4 percent. Conversely, when examining these industries by their
total impact on GDP (Figure A-2), the top three are quick service restaurants (21.0 percent),
business services (19.4 percent), and real estate (13.0 percent). In addition, 86 percent of
establishments that use the business format franchise model are owned by a franchisee, with the
remainder being company (or franchisor) owned.54
49 Knaup and Piazza (2007), p. 4.
50 For a listing of advantages and disadvantages for owning a franchise, see Beshel (2010), p. 10.
51 PwC, p. I-6.
52 p. I-7.
53 Beshel (2010), p. 6.
54 p. I-9.
Figure A-1: Distribution of Jobs in Business Format Franchises, 2007
Source: PwC (2011), p. I-8.
Product distribution franchises account for just under 40,000 franchised establishments in
2007, differentiating them from business format franchises. This type of franchise is one in which
the franchisee is part of the overall distribution chain of the franchisor, with the best examples
being in the soft drink, automobiles, or gasoline sectors.55 Franchising, for instance, accounted for
71.9 percent of total employment among automotive and truck dealers, 40.8 percent of gasoline
service stations that did not have a convenience store, and 14.5 percent of beverage bottling
industry.56 These businesses provided 1.4 million jobs and accounted for $89.6 billion of GDP.57
55 Beshel (2010), p. 6.
56 PwC (2011), p. I-10.
57 p. I-7.
Quick Service
Restaurants, 37.1%
Table/Full Service
Restaurants, 12.7%
Business Services, 12.4%
Lodging, 8.7%
Personal Services, 7.7%
Retail Food, 6.0%
Real Estate, 4.8%
Retail Products &
Services, 4.7%
Commercial &
Residential Services,
Automotive, 2.4%
Figure A-2: Distribution of GDP in Business Format Franchises, 2007
Source: PwC (2011), p. I-9.
Quick Service Restaurants,
Business Services, 19.4%
Real Estate, 13.0%
Personal Services, 10.6%
Lodging, 10.3%
Table/Full Service
Restaurants, 6.2%
Retail Food, 5.7%
Automotive, 5.0%
Retail Products &
Services, 4.4%
Commercial & Residential
Services, 4.3%
The International Franchise Association conducted a survey of franchisors and franchisees
from March 7 to 11, 2011, to gauge access to credit challenges for these business owners. It was
designed to see how credit conditions had improved for this group since a similar survey was
conducted in mid-November 2010. The full results of the survey can be found online.58 This
section will highlight some of the direct responses from those small franchise establishments which
responded that the lack of credit had impacted their business. A fair number of respondents skipped
this question, but for those which did answer it, it is instructive.
Respondents were asked to give examples of either a current franchisee or franchisee prospect who
has encountered difficulty with getting access to credit. Here is a sample of some of the responses:
“Several prospects were unable to obtain credit and we were not able to complete purchase of a
“We have had to work hard to help franchisees find lenders to work with; however, we have been
able to successfully place 100% of our approved franchisees in loans. We have re-evaluated our
criteria we are looking for in regards to liquidity from 2007 to now, but with hand holding, our
franchisees do secure financing.”
“We had a prospect that signed a Franchise Agreement in 2009 to establish our first location in Las
Vegas. Despite being well qualified with both cash and assets, the prospect could not get
financing…. The prospect eventually abandoned that effort in June, 2010.”
“New prospective franchises are finding it VERY difficult to obtain financing which makes it
difficult to consummate deals.”
“We have found that for the individual franchise owner prospect, lending has diminished. Some of
this is due to the fact that 2 years of poor economy, the failure of the housing market, have left these
individuals using their 401k, or have lost [much of the] equity in their homes. This has been the
prime source for establishing a loan.
“Had an individual in New York. He was determined to buy our franchise. This was his `soul
mate’ in reference to the ideal business. We put him in touch with several lenders and he could not
get financed, although he had a good credit score.”
“I have a candidate I have been working with for over 14 months…. He has worked with over 20
banks, all with no success in getting the deal financed. He has a strong personal financial statement,
but still can’t get a loan. The banks are looking for a no risk loan and still making it difficult. They
are asking for direct industry experience, 25-30% cash injection, high levels of collateral and high
cash reserves. If someone has all those things, they are not typically looking at starting new
concepts… they are most likely investing in the concepts that have experienced success in the past.
Very frustrating.”
“Since we are carefully vetting our franchise prospects’ financial position and are only working with
those individuals who are qualified for financing, we are not encountering difficulties.”
“Franchise prospects with good credit are being asked for ridiculous collateral ratios combined with
liquid capital. If they had these kinds of funds available, they would not need the bank for a loan to
start a business.”
“A new franchisee who was a former … franchisee and had dealt with a local banker with SBA for
many years. He was unable to get a loan to start his new [franchise]. Through another financial
58 Reynolds (2011b).
source who had set up an innovative way to get qualified candidates/ franchisees a line of credit,
obtained this line of credit within 48 hours.”
“Most candidates we assist in matching with quality franchise companies in the past were able to
finance their business with home equity or the 401k program. With the unemployment so high, we
should be helping candidates find [opportunities] as an entrepreneur. Now that American Dream is
fading. Remember all franchise opportunities aren’t millions. Help assist the “everyday”
entrepreneur with smaller loan amounts under $250k.”
“The vast majority of people inquiring about our business aren’t able to obtain funding.”
“We have been informed by SBA that if we were a successful company, they were not interested in
guaranteeing our loan. Their purpose is more of a rescue vehicle for struggling companies or
companies failing for lack of funding. Our financials were too strong to be of interest and would not
allow them to fulfill their mission.”
Similar to the survey for franchisors, franchisees were asked to describe issues that they were
experiencing with limited access to credit. The following are examples from those who responded to the
“I have an SBA loan that I wanted to restructure. My SBA lender said that there were no programs
available to existing borrowers.”
“I tried to sell my businesses in 2010 and am still trying in 2011, but buyers cannot obtain credit to
purchase a resale franchise.”
“The total credit line on one of my accounts was reduced by 35%.”
“Not able to sell troubled assets.”
“Limited access to credit has kept me from adding additional positions, vehicles, and equipment for
“I tried two local banks for a loan to pay off existing debt and was simply told that we are not
making loans to small businesses at this time. It was clear there was no interest on their part to
even have the discussion.”
Affects my clients more than me. Some clients have not been able to obtain credit to purchase
products or services from me.”
“Business credit card limit lowered 45%, despite having a strong history of on-time payments on
all my debts.”
“My business relies on my clients’ ability to get credit to fund the purchase of their business. Most
have used 401k funds rather than … secure bank funding.”
“My clients’ limited access to credit has deeply impacted my business. If there were able to
finance my services then [my] business would be able to rebound.”
“Sustained lack of business due to low consumer confidence would likely preclude me from getting
a loan.”
“We suffered significant losses in revenue in 2008 and especially 2009. This caused the business
to suffer the first financial loss years since the mid-1990s.”
“Limited my ability to carry receivables and to handle my expenses during the normal seasonal
“The banks won’t hardly talk to you. If they did, they required mountains of paperwork before
turning you down.”
“I need business, not credit.”
... poslovne usluge (144,94 milijarde USD) i osobne usluge (87,23 milijarde USD).Važno je istaknuti da se u periodu od 2008. do 2011. godine, u segmentu franšize, u odnosu na cijelu ekonomiju SAD, bilježe pozitivnije stope rasta zaposlenosti. Konkretno, u 2011. godini u odnosu na 2010. u franšizni rast zaposlenosti je 2,5%, dok je za sve biznise 1,7%.(Moutray et al. 2011).Franšizni biznis u SAD, pored iznimnog uspjeha, karakterizira i visoka razina zadovoljstva. Anketiranje kupaca franšiza u SAD pokazalo je da ih se više od 94% osjeća uspješnim, a 75% njih bi opet kupilo franšizu (Privredna komora Srbije 2008). Snagu franšize u SAD pokazuju i podaci da najpoznatije i najuspješnije franšize dolaze iz SAD. ...
Full-text available
The subject of the research is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of a franchise business with a particular emphasis on the development of the franchise in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The main goals of this paper are to identify the main obstacles in the development of the franchise in Bosnia and Herzegovina and recommendation of measures to improve this business model to take advantage of its great features. Franchising is a business model that is in most cases based on a win-win relationship between the franchisor and the franchisee. Because of this, franchise is a chance for permanent development of participants in franchising. The paper shows that the franchise is extremely popular and developed way of doing business in developing countries. This is reflected in the growing path of revenues, number of employees, number of franchise locations and participation in the GDP of business entities that apply the franchise mode of operation. Applying scientific methods of synthesis, induction and deduction, determined by numerous causes slow down the development of the franchise concept in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Taking into account the above, we can formulate a hypothesis in the following way: Non-stimulating business environment and inadequate knowledge of the franchise are key reasons for the inadequate development of the franchise business in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Full-text available
A study that extends previous research on the longevity of businesses shows that survival decreases at a decreasing rate; establishments that manage to survive the crucial 4-year period after their birth have a better chance of surviving longer and experiencing employment growth.
Full-text available
The annual cost of federal regulations in the United States increased to more than $1.75 trillion in 2008. Had every U.S. household paid an equal share of the federal regulatory burden, each would have owed $15,586 in 2008. By comparison, the federal regulatory burden exceeds by 50 percent private spending on health care, which equaled $10,500 per household in 2008. While all citizens and businesses pay some portion of these costs, the distribution of the burden of regulations is quite uneven. The portion of regulatory costs that falls initially on businesses was $8,086 per employee in 2008. Small businesses, defined as firms employing fewer than 20 employees, bear the largest burden of federal regulations. As of 2008, small businesses face an annual regulatory cost of $10,585 per employee, which is 36 percent higher than the regulatory cost facing large firms (defined as firms with 500 or more employees). The regulatory landscape highlighted above and detailed in this report emerges from an updated analysis of the regulatory record explored in three previous studies for the Office of the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration (Hopkins, 1995; Crain and Hopkins, 2001; and Crain, 2005). Direct comparisons to the results in these prior studies should be made with caution, however. The present study introduces some new methodological techniques, which may account for some of the differences in the cost estimates for 2008 versus those for prior years.
Full-text available
The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations found in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Advocacy, the United States Small Business Administration, or the United States government.
Full-text available
information and analysis that was reviewed and edited by officials of the Office of Advocacy. However, the final conclusions of the report do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Advocacy. Small and large firms have differing roles in the labor market. Relatively new data now allow us to better dissect the labor market with respect to job flows (hires, fires, retires, and job hoppers) and firm size and even in some instances firm age. Understanding who creates and destroys jobs is paramount as we seek a solution for our loss of over 7 million net jobs from December 2007 to
Full-text available
It is commonly believed that the franchising method of distribution provides strategic and operational benefits to the companies that adopt it. These benefits should result in superior financial performance as compared to that of firms that do not use franchising. Yet, the empirical evidence of the effects of franchising on financial performance is sparse and mixed. The purpose of this article is to examine the empirical evidence of the impact of franchising on US publicly traded restaurant firms. The results provide some evidence that franchising firms create more market and economic value than do non-franchising firms in the US public restaurant sector.
The view that small businesses create the most jobs remains appealing to policymakers and small business advocates. Using data from the Census Bureau's Business Dynamics Statistics and Longitudinal Business Database, we explore the many issues at the core of this ongoing debate. We find that the relationship between firm size and employment growth is sensitive to these issues. However, our main finding is that once we control for firm age, there is no systematic relationship between firm size and growth. Our findings highlight the important role of business start-ups and young businesses in U.S. job creation.
T he 1990s saw many sectors of our economy grow apace, through either mergers, buyouts, or new openings. Signs of the times (figuratively and literally, as one bank bought out or merged with another) were on hometown banks, and the fruits of new construction festooned many neighbor-hoods. In addition to new homes going up, new businesses were moving in to take advantage of the growing wealth in the United States. Our understanding of new businesses has been limited largely to the manufac-turing sector and to the scale of the firm, not to the establishment. 1 The main rea-son for this shortcoming is limitations on the data available for study. In many countries—including the United States until recently—manufacturing was the only sector for which data with the capa-bility of linking firms across time were compiled on a regular basis. Thus, except for firms in the manufacturing sector, no history of a firm's behavior could be constructed. This research summary examines the business survival characteristics of all establishments that started in the United States in the late 1990s, when the boom of much of that decade was not yet showing signs of weakness. The analysis present-ed builds on and extends a report from the Minnesota Department of Economic Security on business churning from 1993 to 1995. 2 The report profiled business births, survival rates, and deaths during the early years of the decade, when the boom was just starting. This article fol-lows the businesses reported on into the recession of 2001 to see how they fared once the economy took a downturn. The analysis follows a birth cohort from the second quarter of 1998 through the next 16 quarters, differing from previous analy-ses in both focus and time frame. The focus is on only completely new en-trants—that is, new firms which open a single establishment. The analysis encom-passes all sectors of the economy; surviv-al rates of establishments, as well as sev-eral measures of employment, are reported and compared across sectors.
Two types of factors influencing the growth of franchising firms are investigated --strategic factors, which franchisors can manipulate in an effort to influence their growth rates, and contextual factors, which franchisors cannot easily control and must regard as "givens." The hypotheses regarding strategic factors were that franchise start-up costs and initial franchise fee have a negative impact on franchise network growth and that a franchisor's growth orientation has a positive impact on growth. The hypotheses pertaining to contextual factors were that firm age and size are negatively related to network growth and that industry growth and franchisor reputation are positively associated with growth.All hypotheses were assessed in light of the five-year growth patterns of business format franchisors operating in the United States from 1991 to 1998.The initial source of the franchisors studied was Entrepreneur magazine. Although most of the hypotheses were supported by the data, industry growth varied inversely with firm growth, and franchise start-up costs actually had a positive impact on growth rates.These findings suggest that both strategic and contextual factors influence firm growth but that strategy exerts more influence than context. (SAA)
There’s been a long, sometimes heated, debate on the role of firm size in employment growth. Despite skepticism in the academic community, the notion that growth is negatively related to firm size remains appealing to policymakers and small business advocates. The widespread and repeated claim from this community is that most new jobs are created by small businesses. Using data from the Census Bureau Business Dynamics Statistics and Longitudinal Business Database, we explore the many issues regarding the role of firm size and growth that have been at the core of this ongoing debate (such as the role of regression to the mean). We find that the relationship between firm size and employment growth is sensitive to these issues. However, our main finding is that once we control for firm age there is no systematic relationship between firm size and growth. Our findings highlight the important role of business startups and young businesses in U.S. job creation. Business startups contribute substantially to both gross and net job creation. In addition, we find an “up or out” dynamic of young firms. These findings imply that it is critical to control for and understand the role of firm age in explaining U.S. job creation.