ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Public Health Education in South Asia: A Basis for Structuring a Master Degree Course

Frontiers
Frontiers in Public Health
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Countries in South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) lack enough public health workforces to address their poor public health situation. Recently, there have been efforts to develop capacity building in public health in these countries by producing competent public health workforce through public health institutes and schools. Considering the wide nature of public health, the public health education and curricula should be linked with skills, knowledge, and competencies needed for public health practice and professionalism. The 3 domains of public health practice and the 10 essential public health services provide an operational framework to explore this link between public health practice and public health education. This framework incorporates five core areas of public health education. A master degree course in public health can be structured by incorporating these core areas as basic and reinforcing one of these areas as an elective followed by a dissertation work.
This content is subject to copyright.
PUBLIC HEALTH
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE
published: 21 July 2014
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00088
Public health education in South Asia: a basis for
structuring a master degree course
Rajendra Karkee*
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
Edited by:
Sanjay P. Zodpey, Public Health
Foundation of India, India
Reviewed by:
Sanjay P. Zodpey, Public Health
Foundation of India, India
Himanshu Negandhi, Public Health
Foundation of India, India
*Correspondence:
Rajendra Karkee, B. P. Koirala Institute
of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
P.O. Box 7053, Kathmandu
e-mail: rkarkee@gmail.com
Countries in South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) lack enough public
health workforces to address their poor public health situation. Recently, there have been
efforts to develop capacity building in public health in these countries by producing compe-
tent public health workforce through public health institutes and schools. Considering the
wide nature of public health, the public health education and curricula should be linked with
skills, knowledge, and competencies needed for public health practice and professionalism.
The 3 domains of public health practice and the 10 essential public health services provide
an operational framework to explore this link between public health practice and public
health education.This framework incorporates five core areas of public health education. A
master degree course in public health can be structured by incorporating these core areas
as basic and reinforcing one of these areas as an elective followed by a dissertation work.
Keywords:public health education, postgraduate course, SouthAsia, public health practice, public health workforce
INTRODUCTION
Health is an important determinant of economic prosperity and
development of a nation (1), and central to the achievement of
all millenium development goals (2). One way to improve health
is to build up public health capacity by strengthening the public
health education and by producing public health workforce (3),
since the empirical evidence suggests that major improvement of
health does not come from new medical findings or cures, but
from the broad development and application of population-based
preventive programs (4).
The South Asian countries under the South Asian Associ-
ation for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) include Afghanistan,
Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri
Lanka. Excluding Maldives and Sri Lanka, the remaining six
countries have nearly one-fifth of the world’s population with
about 27% of global disease burden (680,859 thousands disability-
adjusted life years lost in 2010) (5). These countries are undergoing
an epidemiological transition with a double burden of diseases,
unfinished agenda of infectious diseases, nutritional deficiencies,
and unsafe pregnancies, as well as the challenge of escalating
epidemics of non-communicable diseases (6). Despite this sit-
uation, public health education in these countries has largely
been neglected compared with medical education until recently,
resulting in inadequate public health schools and workforce (3,7).
WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia has called for a para-
digm shift in approach to public health by focusing on a preventive
and promotive health system that can actively change conditions
that make people sick and by producing a public health workforce
through public health institutes and schools in its landmark con-
ference in Calcutta (8,9). As a result, efforts have been already
made to establish new public health institutes, schools, and public
health education networking in these countries (6). For example,
Public Health Foundation of India has been working to estab-
lish several Indian institutes of public health since 2006 and BP
Koirala Institute of Health Sciences in Nepal started a School of
Public Health in 2005 (7,10).
NATURE OF PUBLIC HEALTH
It has been noted that health is determined not only by indi-
vidual behavioral factors but also by population related social,
economic, political, cultural, and environmental factors (11).
In fact, public health evolved from narrow disease-focused to
broader population-based, multidisciplinary, and multisectoral
disciplines as collective action for sustained population-wide
health improvement” (12). It needs contributions from various
disciplines: sociologist, economist, politician, environmentalist,
epidemiologist, statistician, clinician, etc. It needs to collaborate
with different sectors: education, nutrition and food production,
employment and income generating activities, water and sanita-
tion, housing, etc. This means that public health is everybody’s
business and responsibility, achievable only if health in a broad
sense becomes a central concern of the policy-making process
with prime role played by the state. Such wide nature of public
health might pose a challenge to organizing public health educa-
tion and developing capacity building when compared to medicine
or nursing education (13). In fact, there is a great variation in
institutes and courses offered in the South Asian countries (9).
A post-graduate course needs to incorporate intersectorial, inter-
disciplinary, and community-oriented nature of public health. A
framework of post-graduate course provision can guide the course
development (14).
THE THREE DOMAINS AND 10 ACTIVITIES OF PUBLIC HEALTH
A framework consisting of three domains of public health is use-
ful to manage the wide nature of public health and to clarify its
boundaries in terms of public health practice and public health
education (15). The three domains, health improvement, health
protection, and health services, are inter-related with a common
www.frontiersin.org July 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 88 | 1
Karkee Public health education in South Asia
Health
Protecon
Health
Services
Health
Improvement
(Epidemiology and Biostatistics) Ethics and
Use of Information
4. Assure a competent health
services workforce
5) Evaluate health services
6) Link people to needed health
services
7) Develop policies and plans.
8) Inform, educate, and empower
9) Monitor the health status of the
population
10) Mobilize community action.
1) Enforce laws and regulations
2) Protect the environment and workplaces
3) Diagnose and investigate health problem
5
)
6
)
v
es
g
Im
h
e
FIGURE 1 | The 3 domains and 10 activities of public health practice. Modified from Ref. (15).
core (Figure 1). The common core includes research methods
(epidemiology and biostatistics), ethics, and use of information.
Health improvement domain includes socio-economic influences
and health promotion, tackling the underlying determinants of
health; health protection domain includes infectious diseases con-
trol, disaster prevention, environmental health regulation, and
occupational health; and health services domain includes health
care system and policy, service quality, health care management,
evidence-based practice, and health economics. The 10 essential
public health services have been identified (16), which can be
divided among the three domains (Figure 1).
The 10 public health services indicate the settings where public
health professionals work. Thus, the framework can also guide to
outline the basic competencies required for public health gradu-
ates. It can help to discover the interface between public health
education and public health practice, thereby showing how the
public health education can be organized to support the develop-
ment of competent public health workforce to deliverpublic health
programs. It can be utilized to construct a basic competency-
based model in post-graduate education in public health to achieve
10 essential public health services. Building on this basic model,
detail competencies need to be specified in chosen concentra-
tion area and be tailored to the individual need of a school
or institute so that the post-graduate program is effective and
relevant to its context. Competencies for public health course
have been formulated in different countries: by the council on
linkages between Academia and Public Health Practice (17); by
Association of School of Public Health in USA (18); by pub-
lic health Agency of Canada (19); and by the Association of
Schools of Public Health in the European Region (20). Simi-
larly,competencies for Master of Public Health course in Australia,
India, and in other low and middle-income countries have been
prepared (14,21,22).
BASIS OF STRUCTURING A POST-GRADUATE PUBLIC
HEALTH COURSE
A post-graduate course in public health can start with core courses
representing all the three domains, with an opportunity to gain
advanced knowledge in one of those core courses. This can be ful-
filled by structuring the post-graduate course in three parts: core
course, electives, and thesis.
CORE COURSE
The core course is not considered as in depth study but basic
knowledge and skills needed to perform all public health services
in all the three domains. The core course should include basic
knowledge in these areas: epidemiology; biostatistics; health pol-
icy,management, and economics (health services administration);
social and behavioral sciences (medical sociology, health edu-
cation, health promotion, behavior change); and environmental
health. These are internationally agreed five core areas of pub-
lic health, which are consistent with the three domains of public
health practice, and with curriculum proposed by the Associa-
tions of School of Public Health in USA and Europe (18,20); and
competencies based course design for Public Health in Australia
(22). The core course also needs to incorporate the globalization
impact on health as globalization has been acknowledged as one
of the determinants of health in this era of interdependence (23).
Besides, urbanization, population aging, and health disparities are
new challenges in the twenty-first century, and hence, worthy of
inclusion in core component. These new challenges will largely
shape the national and global health (24).
In addition to these core areas, public health ethics and public
health skill development (writing and speaking skills, manage-
ment and leadership skills, conflict management, interpersonal
relationship, negotiation skills with politicians and media, liter-
ature search, computer skills) should also be added to the basic
Frontiers in Public Health | Public Health Education and Promotion July 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 88 | 2
Karkee Public health education in South Asia
Table 1 | Examples of elective modules in each domain of public health practice.
Health improvement Health protection Health services
Primary health care
Public health nutrition
Advanced epidemiology and biostatistics Health care policy and management
Design and analysis of epidemiological studies Health leadership and management
Maternal and child nutrition Statistical methods in epidemiology District health management
Nutrition policy and programing Designing disease control programs Health systems design and management
Nutrition assessment and malnutrition Infectious diseases epidemiology Health system research
Medical sociology and anthropology Non-communicable diseases epidemiology Maternal and child health
Health promotion AIDS Integrated management of childhood illness
Health education and behavior change Disaster and post-disaster management Safe motherhood and prenatal health
Environmental health Reproductive/sexual health
Medical entomology Family planning programs
Hygiene, water, and sanitation inter ventions Health economics
Occupational health Health care financing
Globalization and health Health sector reform and financing
Health care evaluation
Hospital administration
component. These skills have been increasingly recognized as
crucial for effective public health practice (18,25). Especially,
a recent Lancet report on education of health professionals for
the twenty-first century has made three recommendations for
future health education that include public health skill devel-
opment: informative and transformative learning that bridges
the gap between science and practice; training in teamwork
and interpersonal relationships; and technology (computers and
communication) (13).
ELECTIVE COURSES
Owing to broad nature of public health, it is desirable to gain in
depth knowledge in a particular concentration area. A wide vari-
ety of elective courses and modules can be offered in each domain
(Table 1). The elective courses can focus on particular population
groups, for example, maternal and child health, mental health, etc.
Elective courses should be guided by what type of health profes-
sionals the community or the country needs more, what the most
unmet health needs of the communities are, and what employment
opportunities for the graduates exist. Incorporation of practical
field-based studies should be encouraged and included because
the public health skills and management are best learnt in the
field. Such community based field studies can be conducted as fre-
quent small mini projects, field site observations in parallel with
classroom teaching or as an internship in the form of real public
health practice by placing students in relevant community orga-
nizations, government health departments, or non-government
organizations.
THESIS
The master research project is an opportunity for a student to deal
with a public health issue, commonly in his/her concentration
area. It demands integration of empirical data, theory, and meth-
ods. Students are familiarized with data collection, study design,
literature search, interpretation of data, and independent scien-
tific writing. It is desirable that thesis be based on primary data
obtained from fieldwork but thesis can also be based on secondary
data, desk-study in the form of systematic review,metaanalysis, or
other project work.
CONCLUSION
The multidisciplinary and multisectorial nature of public health
might pose a challenge to organizing public health education.
The three domains of public health practice provide an opera-
tional framework to explore the interface between public health
practice and public health education. This framework incor-
porates five core areas of public health education. A post-
graduate course in public health can be structured by incorpo-
rating the five core areas of public health as basic subjects and
reinforcing one of those subjects as an elective followed by a
dissertation work.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organisation. Regional Macroeconomics and Health Framework.
New Delhi: World Health Organisation, Regional Office for South-East Asia
(2004).
2. Haines A, Cassels A. Can the millennium development goals be attained? BMJ
(2004) 329(7462):394–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7462.394
3. Petrakova A, Sadana R. Problems and progress in public health education.
Bull World Health Organ (2007) 85(12):doi:10.2471/BLT.07.046110 discussion
966-970
4. Institute of Medicine. The Future of the Public’s Health in the 21st Century. Wash-
ington, DC: The National Academy Press (2003).
5. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al.
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions,
1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
Lancet (2012) 380(9859):2197–223. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689- 4
6. World Health Organisation. A Decade of Public Health Achievements in WHO’s
South-East Asia Region: 2004–2013. New Delhi: World Health Organization,
Regional Office for South-East Asia (2013).
7. Mahat A, Bezruchka SA, Gonzales V, Connell FA. Assessment of graduate public
health education in Nepal and perceived needs of faculty and students. Hum
Resour Health (2013) 11(1):16. doi:10.1186/1478-4491- 11-16
8. ASHTON JR. Regional Conference on Public Health in South East Asia in the
21st century, Calcutta, 22–24 November 1999. J Epidemiol Community Health
(2000) 54(10):749. doi:10.1136/jech.54.10.749
9. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. South-East Asia Public Health Initia-
tive Report of the first Meeting of the Strategic Advisory group SEARO, New Delhi,
1-2 November. New Delhi: WHO Project No: ICP OSD 001 (2005).
www.frontiersin.org July 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 88 | 3
Karkee Public health education in South Asia
10. Sharma K, Zodpey S. Public health education in India: need and demand para-
dox. Indian J Community Med (2011) 36(3):178–81. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.
86516
11. World Health Organisation. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva:
World Helath Organisation (1986).
12. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, Adams O, McKee M. Public health
in the new era: improving health through collective action. Lancet (2004)
363(9426):2084–6. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16461-1
13. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA,Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals
for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an
interdependent world. Lancet (2010) 376(9756):1923–58. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(10)61854-5
14. Sharma K, Zodpey S, Morgan A, Gaidhane A, Syed ZQ. Designing the frame-
work for competency-based master of public health programs in India. J Public
Health Manag Pract (2013) 19(1):30–9. doi:10.1097/PHH.0b013e318241da5d
15. Thorpe A, Griffiths S, Jewell T, Adshead F.The three domains of public health: an
internationally relevant basis for public health education? Public Health (2008)
122(2):201–10. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.013
16. Public Health Functions Steering Committee. The Public Health Workforce: An
Agenda for the 21st Century. A Report of the Public Health Functions Project.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1995). Available from: http:
//www.health.gov/phfunctions/Default.htm
17. The Council on Linkages between Academia and Public Health Practice.
Core competencies for Public Health Professionals Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3
(2010). Available from: http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Documents/Core_
Competencies_for_Public_Health_Professionals_2010May.pdf
18. ASPH Education Committee. Master’s Degree in Public Health Core Competency
Model Version 2.3. Association of Schools of Public health (2006). Availablefrom:
http://www.aspph.org/educate/models/mph-competency-model
19. Public health agency of Canada. Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada
Release 1.0 (2007). Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/php-psp/
ccph-cesp/pdfs/cc-manual- eng090407.pdf
20. Birt CA, Foldspang A. The developing role of systems of competences in public
health education and practice. Public Health Rev (2011) 33(1):134–47.
21. Zwanikken P, Alexander L, Huong N, Qian X, Valladares L, Mohamed N, et al.
Validation of public health competencies and impact variables for low- and
middle-income countries. BMC Public Health (2014) 14(1):55. doi:10.1186/
1471-2458- 14-55
22. Genat B, Robinson P. New competencies for public health graduates: a use-
ful tool for course design. Aust N Z J Public Health (2010) 34(5):513–6.
doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00599.x
23. Frenk J, Gómez-Dantés O, Moon S. From sovereignty to solidarity: a renewed
concept of global health for an era of complex interdependence. Lancet (2014)
383(9911):94–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62561-1
24. Fried LP, Begg MD, Bayer R, Galea S. MPH Education for the 21st Century:
motivation, rationale, and key principles for the New Columbia Public Health
Curriculum. Am J Public Health (2013) 104(1):23–30. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.
301399
25. Begg MD, Galea S, Bayer R, Walker JR, Fried LP. MPH Education for the 21st
century: design of Columbia University’s New Public Health Curriculum. Am
J Public Health (2013) 104(1):30–6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301518
Conflict of Interest Statement: The author declares that the researchwas conducted
in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed
as a potential conflict of interest.
Received: 22 May 2014; accepted: 05 July 2014; published online: 21 July 2014.
Citation: Karkee R (2014) Public health education in South Asia: a basis for structuring
a master degree course. Front. Public Health 2:88. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00088
This article was submitted to Public Health Education and Promotion, a section of the
journal Frontiers in Public Health.
Copyright © 2014 Karkee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or repro-
duction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are
credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with
accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which
does not comply with these terms.
Frontiers in Public Health | Public Health Education and Promotion July 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 88 | 4
... The public health realm has 3 domains and 10 essential services related to public health. 65 The 3 domains are health services, health protection, and health improvement. 65 In health services, the essential services include assuring a competent health services workforce, evaluating health services, linking people to needed health services, and developing policies and plans. ...
... 65 The 3 domains are health services, health protection, and health improvement. 65 In health services, the essential services include assuring a competent health services workforce, evaluating health services, linking people to needed health services, and developing policies and plans. 65 The health protection domain includes the essential services of enforcing laws and regulations, protecting the environment and workplace, and diagnosing and investigating health problems. ...
... 65 In health services, the essential services include assuring a competent health services workforce, evaluating health services, linking people to needed health services, and developing policies and plans. 65 The health protection domain includes the essential services of enforcing laws and regulations, protecting the environment and workplace, and diagnosing and investigating health problems. 65 Finally, the health improvement domain includes informing, educating, and empowering the public; monitoring health status of the population; and mobilizing community action. ...
Article
Full-text available
Context Athletic training is at the forefront of the prevention of injury and illness. As the push for population-level approaches continues, including the expansion of standards related to professional preparation, there is a need to examine the knowledge and practice application of public health topics of athletic trainers (ATs), as they may serve as role models or preceptors. Objective To assess ATs' knowledge and practice application of public health topics. Design and Setting Online survey with knowledge assessment. Participants Four hundred eighty-seven ATs (age = 35.8 ± 11.1 years, years credentialed = 12.8 ± 10.6) voluntarily participated. Intervention(s) The instrument included a demographic section, a pre and post perceived-knowledge assessment, a practice-behavior frequency matrix, and the Public Health Assessment Tool (PHAT) developed by the authors and Delphi panelists. Main Outcome Measure(s) Measures of central tendency were calculated for the practice-behavior frequency matrix. Perceived knowledge was compared pre- and post-PHAT. We calculated a total PHAT score to measure actual knowledge, and compared perceived and actual knowledge to determine if a knowledge gap existed. Results A significant difference (P > .001) was identified for perceived knowledge before and after the PHAT. On the PHAT, participants scored 12.14 ± 2.21 out of 19. The 3 most commonly missed questions directly related to the 3 least practiced topics: social determinants of health, assessing environmental health factors, and assessing health-related quality of life. When exploring the relationship between perceived and actual knowledge, we identified a weak, significant relationship between post-PHAT perceived-knowledge mean and actual-knowledge assessment scores (r = 0.105, P = .022). Conclusions A knowledge gap exists concerning public health topics in ATs. A lack of knowledge related to public health topics identifies the need for ATs to be mindful of the intersection of daily clinical practice and population health with a future emphasis on deploying community-based health promotion.
... Staff shortages at LMIC SPHs are also a major concern [54], as revealed by the 2008 AfriHealth project findings [45]. Of noticeable comparative absence is public health expertise [53,55,56], which may reflect the scarcity of SPHs as compared to nursing and medical schools that have expanded in countries such as Pakistan [10,57,58]. There are also gaps in the availability of public health programs that address specific LMIC health issues, as is the case in South Asia. ...
... environmental health, reproductive health) or skill gaps (e.g. epidemiology and biostatistics) [58,60,72,81,[99][100][101][102]. Makerere University Kampala School of Public Health, in response to the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, organized a training course on outbreak preparedness and response as part of a multidisciplinary task force [101]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Public health has multicultural origins. By the close of the nineteenth century, Schools of Public Health (SPHs) began to emerge in western countries in response to major contemporary public health challenges. The Flexner Report (1910) emphasized the centrality of preventive medicine, sanitation, and public health measures in health professional education. The Alma Ata Declaration on Primary Health Care (PHC) in 1978 was a critical milestone, especially for low and middle-income countries (LMICs), conceptualizing a close working relationship between PHC and public health measures. The Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2005–2008) strengthened the case for SPHs in LMICs as key stakeholders in efforts to reduce global health inequities. This scoping review groups text into public health challenges faced by LMICs and the role of SPHs in addressing these challenges. Main text The challenges faced by LMICs include rapid urbanization, environmental degradation, unfair terms of global trade, limited capacity for equitable growth, mass displacements associated with conflicts and natural disasters, and universal health coverage. Poor governance and externally imposed donor policies and agendas, further strain the fragile health systems of LMICs faced with epidemiological transition. Moreover barriers to education and research imposed by limited resources, political and economic instability, and unbalanced partnerships additionally aggravate the crisis. To address these contextual challenges effectively, SPHs are offering broad based health professional education, conducting multidisciplinary population based research and fostering collaborative partnerships. SPHs are also looked upon as the key drivers to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs). Conclusion SPHs in LMICs can contribute to overcoming several public health challenges being faced by LMICs, including achieving SDGs. Most importantly they can develop cadres of competent and well-motivated public health professionals: educators, practitioners and researchers who ask questions that address fundamental health determinants, seek solutions as agents of change within their mandates, provide specific services and serve as advocates for multilevel partnerships. Funding support, human resources, and agency are unfortunately often limited or curtailed in LMICs, and this requires constructive collaboration between LMICs and counterpart institutions from high income countries.
... Unfortunately, public health has long been an underrepresented field of study in the South Asian diaspora. 23 This lack of interest in public health has proved detrimental to public health projects in many South Asian countries, which have been unable to produce and keep a substantial workforce to support much-needed public health infrastructure. ...
Article
Within higher education, underrepresented students continue to face inequalities and discrimination, with unique challenges surfacing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mentoring through formal or informal channels is one way to offer assistance to such students. During COVID-19 lockdowns, as classes and work moved online, mentoring also transitioned online. Electronic mentoring, or e-mentoring, was implemented formally by some universities and informally by independent researchers. This article describes the informal mentoring experiences of the lead author with 8 female student researchers, 6 of whom were mentored online. The students represented different racial and ethnic backgrounds, offering a collection of e-mentoring case studies during the pandemic. These independent field reports should not be assumed to represent any of the students' 6 universities, but they are a sample of what can be achieved by invested e-mentors. By sharing these anecdotal experiences, the authors call on all researchers of underrepresented groups to consider e-mentoring to support underrepresented student researchers and diversify the public health research field.
... Extensive studies conducted on graduate education both domestically and internationally have focused mainly on the current education and cultivating models (7)(8)(9)(10). However, few have investigated the employment outcome of the master's graduates. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aims: The purposes of this study are (1) to understand the current employment situation of master's graduates in Public Health and Preventive Medicine (PHPM) and (2) to provide evidence for career guidance and training of competent PHPM personnel. Methods: The master's graduates of the School of Public Health from the years 2014–2018 who majored in PHPM were chosen as research subjects. Questionnaires were distributed, and completed questionnaires were collected. The employment situation and characteristics of these graduates were analyzed based on the questionnaire data. Results: The employment rate of these graduates was 95.45%. They were employed mainly in hospitals, followed by colleges and centers for disease control and prevention. The initial salaries were low. Graduates whose jobs barely or not at all matched their areas of specialization were 23.64 or 6.36%, respectively. Nevertheless, the percentage of students who had remained with their jobs since graduation was 82.73%. A total of 40% of the graduates were neutral about or dissatisfied with their jobs. Furthermore, 29% of them claimed that they were undervalued by their employers. Last, but not least, graduates were encouraged to gain experience in creativity, organizational or management skills, social networking experience, and interpersonal and professional skills. Conclusion: Overall, the employment status of master's graduates in PHPM is good. Problems such as low initial salaries, jobs not matching graduates' areas of specialization, and feelings of being undervalued by employers were observed. It is necessary to improve employment outcomes by revising training models, formulating employment policies, and implementing training efforts.
... Frequently researchers and academicians have suggested reforms of public health education in Low Middle Income Countries (LMIC); curriculums have been purposed for public health institutes in these regions (Karkee, 2014;Zwanikken et al., 2014). Scan of Public health institutes in Pakistan, India, and Nepal showed 31 institutions offering wide ranges of degrees in Public Health, general competencies for the region in table-1 (Publc Health Foundation of India, 2009). ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim of this paper is to report the processes and outcomes of a curriculum review conducted in Health Services Academy (HSA), a national level Public Health institute in Pakistan. An organizational review with qualitative data collection and a desk study of Master of Science in Public Health program at HSA. The guiding framework for this review is The Lancet commission report on " Health professional for the New Century ". Main outcome indicators are transformative learning and interdependence in education. FGDs with current students, alumni's and employers shed light upon reasons for selecting HSA for MSPH program, difficulties and challenges faced in course work, comparative benefits of this program, and what were the preferences of hiring bodies. Desk review indicates financing constraints faced by the institute, low faculty to student ratio and stewardship opportunity, need for international networking, academic advising and carrier counseling, new admission policies. Using a road map, the faculty members developed new competencies. Reviewed and revised past competencies to make them more specific and measurable, and aligned them to learning objectives of individual courses.
Chapter
Historically, public health practice was based on a trial and error method of using empirical or expert knowledge and skills. Over time, the emphasis was placed on documenting the various observations and intervention testing. Scientific journals became the place of documentation and mode of dissemination. The methodology, i.e., the quality of research conduct, is getting refined and better reported nowadays, including improved access to research evidence. Thanks to the open access policy and information technology, which facilitate access to the available evidence from anywhere in the world. Worldwide, billions of dollars are spent annually on health research to improve understanding of health and disease [1]. More than half of the grants are sanctioned for basic science research, followed by clinical research. Public health research receives the lowest proportion of grants. As a result of all these research works, at least one million research papers are published yearly in scientific journals. However, the translation of this research into policy or practice remained low over decades. Iain et al. call these “avoidable waste in producing and reporting research evidence.” Translation of research or the impact of research is getting popular recently, and most funding agencies and government organizations seek clarification before sanctioning any project.
Article
Full-text available
In recent decades there have been attempts in many professions to define the competences of their practitioners. Over the last quarter century attempts have been made to apply this to public health; initiatives in several countries have been devised to meet the perceived needs of public health education and training (e.g., the United States), of public health practice (e.g., the United Kingdom), etc. The achievements and some of the failings of US and UK initiatives are reviewed.Since 2006 The Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER) has been working on a system of public health competences suited and adapted to the needs of both public health education and training, and practice. After much work and several stages of development, a third series of competence lists (for public health practitioners generally, for MPH-related education, and for employment purposes) will soon be published. ASPHER believes that for sus­tainability of a competences project, the competences proposed must be seen as relevant by all public health practitioners and stakeholders, including those engaged in education and training, service work, and public health research. Accordingly, all these stakeholders need to be involved in the preparation of lists of competences.Sustainability will also require an ongoing system and structure for permanent review of existing public health competences, and of the need for definition of new ones. Possible directions towards the achievement of this are indicated. A generally accepted system of core competences could contribute most to the establishment of a clearly identifiable public health profession across Europe, equipped to address current and future health needs of its peoples.All three experiences described share similar challenges, and on a continuing basis these will of necessity need to be addressed in the future: the assessment of whether competences have been achieved or not; the evaluation of whether lists of competences are genuinely appropriate both to population health challenges and to the development and management of systems of intervention as experienced in practice; identification of appropriate means to take account of geographical, regional and national disparities within one common competence system.
Article
Full-text available
The number of Master of Public Health (MPH) programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is increasing, but questions have been raised regarding the relevance of their outcomes and impacts on context. Although processes for validating public health competencies have taken place in recent years in many high-income countries, validation in LMICs is needed. Furthermore, impact variables of MPH programmes in the workplace and in society have not been developed. A set of public health competencies and impact variables in the workplace and in society was designed using the competencies and learning objectives of six participating institutions offering MPH programmes in or for LMICs, and the set of competencies of the Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice as a reference. The resulting competencies and impact variables differ from those of the Council on Linkages in scope and emphasis on social determinants of health, context specificity and intersectoral competencies. A modified Delphi method was used in this study to validate the public health competencies and impact variables; experts and MPH alumni from China, Vietnam, South Africa, Sudan, Mexico and the Netherlands reviewed them and made recommendations. The competencies and variables were validated across two Delphi rounds, first with public health experts (N = 31) from the six countries, then with MPH alumni (N = 30). After the first expert round, competencies and impact variables were refined based on the quantitative results and qualitative comments. Both rounds showed high consensus, more so for the competencies than the impact variables. The response rate was 100 %. This is the first time that public health competencies have been validated in LMICs across continents. It is also the first time that impact variables of MPH programmes have been proposed and validated in LMICs across continents. The high degree of consensus between experts and alumni suggests that these public health competencies and impact variables can be used to design and evaluate MPH programmes, as well as for individual and team assessment and continuous professional development in LMICs.
Article
Full-text available
Background Despite the large body of evidence suggesting that effective public health infrastructure is vital to improving the health status of populations, many universities in developing countries offer minimal opportunities for graduate training in public health. In Nepal, for example, only two institutions currently offer a graduate public health degree. Both institutions confer only a general Masters in Public Health (MPH), and together produce 30 graduates per year. The objective of this assessment was to identify challenges in graduate public health education in Nepal, and explore ways to address these challenges. Methods The assessment included in-person school visits and data collection through semi-structured in-depth interviews with primary stakeholders of Nepal’s public health academic sector. The 72 participants included faculty, students, alumni, and leaders of institutions that offered MPH programs, and the leadership of one government-funded institution that is currently developing an MPH program. Data were analyzed through content analysis to identify major themes. Results Six themes characterizing the challenges of expanding and improving graduate public health training were identified: 1) a shortage of trained public health faculty, with consequent reliance on the internet to compensate for inadequate teaching resources; 2) teaching/learning cultures and bureaucratic traditions that are not optimal for graduate education; 3) within-institution dominance of clinical medicine over public health; 4) a desire for practice–oriented, contextually relevant training opportunities; 5) a demand for degree options in public health specialties (for example, epidemiology); and 6) a strong interest in international academic collaboration. Conclusion Despite an enormous need for trained public health professionals, Nepal’s educational institutions face barriers to developing effective graduate programs. Overcoming these barriers will require: 1) increasing the investment in public health education and 2) improving the academic environment of educational institutions. Long term, committed academic collaborations with international universities may be a realistic way to: 1) redress immediate inadequacies in resources, including teachers; 2) encourage learning environments that promote inquiry, creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking; and 3) support development of the in-country capacity of local institutions to produce a cadre of competent, well-trained public health practitioners, researchers, teachers, and leaders.
Article
The first International Conference on Health Promotion, meeting in Ottawa this 21st day of November 1986, hereby presents this CHARTER for action to achieve Health For All by the year 2000 and beyond. This conference was primarily a response to growing exceptions for a new public health movement around the world. Discussions focused on the needs in industrialized countries, but took into account similar concerns in all other regions. It built on the progress made through the Declaration of Primary Health Care at Alma Ata, the World Health Organization's Targets for Health For All document, and the recent debate at the World Health Assembly on intersectoral action for health.
Article
The moment is ripe to revisit the idea of global health. Despite tens of billions of dollars spent over the past decade under the auspices of global health, 1 a consensus defi nition for this term remains elusive. 2–5 Yet the way in which we understand global health critically shapes not only which and whose problems we tackle, but also the way in which we raise and allocate funds, communicate with the public and policy makers, educate students, and design the global institutions that govern our collective eff orts to protect and promote public health worldwide.
Article
Because public health challenges are changing rapidly, over the past 3 years, we have turned a critical eye to the master of public health program at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. Under a process dubbed “curriculum renewal,” we engaged more than 170 faculty, staff, and students (and hundreds of alumni and employers of our graduates) in an initiative to develop a completely new design for master of public health education that launched in fall 2012. We have described its design and structure and presented some preliminary evaluation data.
Article
Public health is at a watershed moment. The world’s health needs are changing, and complex problems require interdisciplinary approaches and systems-based solutions. Our longer lives and changing environments necessitate life-course and structural approaches to prevention. This argues strongly for public health graduate education that adequately prepares trainees to tackle emerging challenges and to lead now and in the future. Nearly a century of scholarship and scientific advances may offer a blueprint for training the next generation of public health leaders. We articulate a case for change; discuss some of the foundational principles that should guide public health education; and discuss what such a change might look like building on prior scholarship, on the examples set by other disciplines, and on our own experience.
Article
Public health is on the move in South East Asia. A recent conference organised by the South East Asian Regional Office of the World Health Organisation (WHO), in conjunction with various local partners, examined critically the recent contribution of public health in the region, and concluded that it was time to establish a new impetus with a new sense of direction—very much in keeping with the New Public Health thinking that has had such a marked influence in recent years in other parts of the world. The conference, which was held in Calcutta from the 22 to 24 November 1999, resulted in the adoption …