Available via license: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
284Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine | July 2014 | Vol 5 | Issue 2
Comparative efcacy of cedarwood oil and xylene
in hematoxylin and eosin staining procedures: An
experimental study
Abstract
Background: Xylene is used as a clearing agent in hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining of tissue sections in routine
histopathology based diagnosis. However, the hazards associated with exposure to xylene are of concern. Numerous solutions
mainly essential oils have been evaluated in the past as clearing agents, which can possibly be substituted for xylene during the
routine tissue processing. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the efcacy of essential oil (cedarwood oil), as a possible
replacement for xylene in H and E staining procedures. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in the Department
of Oral Pathology and Microbiology. Thirty parafn blocks of the routine biopsy specimen were retrieved from the department
archives. The cedarwood oil was procured from organic and essential oil dealer in the local market. Two to three parafn sections
of four micron thickness were cut from each of the 30 parafn blocks of processed tissue specimens, were subjected to different
clearing agents: Essential oil (8% cedarwood oil) or xylene and stained with H and E stain. The stained sections were scored
based on nuclear and cytoplasmic details, clarity and uniformity of staining. Results: Signicant correlation was observed between
cedarwood oil and xylene in terms of the three staining quality parameters assessed. Conclusions: We conclude that cedarwood
oil can be an effective, eco-friendly and safe alternative to xylene as a clearing agent in the histopathological laboratory.
Key words: Cedarwood oil, clearing, staining, xylene
Sudip Indu,
V. Ramesh,
Priyanka Chakravarty
Indu1,
Karthikshree V. Prashad,
B. Premalatha,
K. Ramadoss
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Dental
Sciences, 1Department of Nutrition and Dietitics, Achariya Arts and Science College, Puducherry, India
Address for correspondence:
Dr. Sudip Indu, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate
Institute of Dental Sciences, Indira Nagar, Gorimedu, Puducherry ‑ 605 006, India.
E‑mail: indusudip30gmailcom
INTRODUCTION
Xylene is a chemical aromatic hydrocarbon,[1] which
has excellent dewaxing and clearing capabilities and
hence routinely used in staining of tissue sections.
[2] Hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) stain forms the
backbone of routine histopathological diagnostic work.
It is remarkably robust and is used to discriminate
between the cytoplasm, nucleus and extracellular
matrix.[1] Despite the remarkable utility of xylene in
histological staining, its use is associated with potential
occupational hazards. It can cause debilitating effects on
skin, eyes, nervous system, blood, liver and kidneys. In
addition, due to its volatility and limitations in complete
containment, it can potentially contaminate the working
environment.[2] Hence in the quest to eliminate or reduce
the use of xylene in histopathology laboratory, numerous
substitute chemicals such as limonene reagents, aliphatic
hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, vegetable oils,
olive oil and mineral oil substitutes were used in the
past.[1] Moreover, any technique, which can minimize or
replace the use of xylene in histopathology laboratory,
will be valuable not only for diagnostic reasons but
as well as for maintaining a relatively safe laboratory
environment. Hence the present study aimed to evaluate
the comparative efcacy of 8% cedarwood oil as a
non‑biohazardous replacement for xylene.
Original Article
Access this article online
Quick Response Code:
Website:
www.jnsbm.org
DOI:
10.4103/0976-9668.136167
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsbm.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 84.30.69.52]
Indu, et al.: Cedar wood oil versus xylene
285 Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine | July 2014 | Vol 5 | Issue 2
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was carried out in the Department of Oral
Pathology and Microbiology. Thirty parafn blocks of
the routine biopsy specimens were retrieved from the
department archives. The essential oil (cedarwood oil)
was procured from the local commercial market (Bon
Appetite‑Go Organic Pondicherry, India outlet, to
which it was supplied from Chaitanya Agro Herbals,
Jayalakshmipuram, Mysore, India).
Two to three parafn sections of four microns thickness
were cut from each of the 30 parafn blocks of routinely
processed tissue specimens. Each of these sections
were deparafnized by the two different clearing agents:
Essential oil – 8% cedarwood oil labeled and xylene.
The paraffin sections cleared by cedarwood oil were
immersed in 8% cedarwood oil solution for about 4 h
at room temperature and then subjected to microwave
processing for about 1 min at 60°C. Following this the
sections were washed in distilled water and subjected to
conventional H and E staining procedure.
The sections cleared by xylene were incubated overnight at
37‑40°C in xylene and then subjected to xylene I, II for 15 min
each followed by conventional H and E staining procedure.
The details of the protocol are summarized in
Table 1 (cedarwood oil) and Table 2 (xylene).
H and E stained sections were graded based on the parameters
of nuclear staining (adequate = score 1, inadequate = score 0),
cytoplasmic staining (adequate = score 1, inadequate = score 0)
and uniformity of staining (present = score 1, absent = score 0).
The scores for each slide were added. A score of <1
was graded as inadequate for diagnosis; slides with score
1‑3 were assigned as adequate for diagnosis. Slides were
scored for diagnosis based on a similar scoring system
used previously.
Statistical analysis
Percentage adequacy of the staining method between
cedarwood and xylene was compared using Chi‑square test. In
the above tests, P < 0.05 was taken to be statistically signicant.
RESULTS
Adequate nuclear staining was observed in 90% and 93.33%
of the sections cleared with cedarwood oil or xylene
respectively [Table 3]. Sections cleared with cedarwood oil
or xylene had similar (93.33%) cytoplasmic staining and
uniformity of staining [Table 3]. Moreover, the scorings
from both groups were not statistically (P = 0.2326)
different [Table 4].
Our results suggest that of all the 30 sections, the sections
which had undergone clearing with cedarwood oil had
comparable results to that of xylene, in terms of adequacy
of nuclear and cytoplasmic staining and overall uniformity
of staining [Graph 1 and Figure 1].
Table 1: The summary of procedure undertaken in
H and E staining with clearing agent cedar wood
oil as deparafnizing agent
Steps Solution Temperature Duration
Deparafnization Clearing agent
cedarwood oil
At room
temperature
2-4 h
Microwave
application
Clearing agent 60°C 1 min
Washing In distilled water At room
temperature
5 min
Rehydration 100%, 100%, 100%,
80%, 60% alcohol
At room
temperature
2 min
each
Nuclear staining Hematoxylin At room
temperature
25 min
Washing in running
tap water
At room
temperature
5 min
Differentiation 2% Acid alcohol At room
temperature
2 dips
Washing in running
tap water
At room
temperature
30 min
Dehydration 60%, 80%, 100%
alcohol
At room
temperature
2 min
each
Cytoplasmic
staining
1% eosin At room
temperature
1 min
Dehydration 100%, 100%, 100%
alcohol
At room
temperature
5 min
Dry and mount in DPX, H and E: Hematoxylin and eosin
Table 2: The summary of procedure undertaken
in H and E staining with clearing agent xylene as
deparafnizing agent
Steps Solution Temperature Duration
Incubation - 37-40°C Overnight
Deparafnization Clearing agents-
xylene‑Ι, ΙΙ
At room
temperature
15 min
each
Drying - At room
temperature
30 min
Rehydration 100%, 100%, 100%,
80%, 60% alcohol
At room
temperature
2 min
each
Nuclear staining Hematoxylin At room
temperature
25 min
Washing in running
tap water
At room
temperature
5 min
Differentiation 2% Acid alcohol At room
temperature
2 dips
Washing in running
tap water
At room
temperature
30 min
Dehydration 60%, 80%, 100%
alcohol
At room
temperature
2 min
each
Cytoplasmic
staining
1% eosin At room
temperature
1 min
Dehydration 100%, 100%, 100%
alcohol
At room
temperature
5 min
Dry and mount in DPX, H and E: Hematoxylin and eosin
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsbm.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 84.30.69.52]
Indu, et al.: Cedar wood oil versus xylene
286Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine | July 2014 | Vol 5 | Issue 2
DISCUSSION
Xylene is an integral component of histopathological
laboratory for the last six decade and is an effective
replacement to other toxic clearing agents such as benzene
and chloroform. However, xylene has inflammable
properties and can manifest skin reactions, cardiac and
blood ailments, neural and renal toxicities.[4] Xylene is a
volatile compound and its disposal are a major problem for
the laboratories were it is being extensively used due to its
potential environmental hazards. Hence, through our study
an attempt was made to evaluate essential oils (cedarwood
oil) as possible substitutes to xylene as clearing agents.
Importantly essential oils are non‑toxic, non‑biohazardous
and eco‑friendly. Our results are in concurrence to previous
reports where cedarwood oil has shown to be a better
clearing agent over xylene in tissue processing (perfect
ribboning).[5] This observation also brought out desirable
results where use of essential oils can also be used at tissue
processing stage before the wax impregnation and tissue
embedding.
As a natural product obtained from several sources,
cedarwood oil differs in characteristics and quality. As per
the literature review, for histological processing a minimally
viscous variety is required. The clearing time will vary,
with more viscous oils taking longer than less viscous oils.
The major advantage of this oil is that it causes almost no
damage to the tissue. However, it does take signicantly
longer time to process and is signicantly expensive than
the usually used alternatives.[6] Nevertheless the added
cost versus work environment safety can be balanced out
with optimal procurement plans. Moreover, tissue cleared
with cedarwood oil were shown to give much favorable
staining results[7] due its gentle and non‑damaging effects
on tissues[8] and are in agreement with our results where
cedarwood oil cleared tissue sections had consistent good
uniformity of staining.
Although other agents like the home use dish washing
soap water solution as a replacement for xylene in clearing
of tissue sections has shown some promise, its potential
effects on some tissue structure is a concern.[3] It is
essential to note that in our study, chemically ripened
Ehrlich’s hematoxylin was used to stain the nuclear
components, whereas in previous studies Harris’s and
Mayer’s hematoxylin were used.[2,3] Being chemically
ripened, this Ehrlich’s hematoxylin has a longer
duration of stability and hence better staining quality
of the sections can be achieved. Nevertheless, Harris’s
hematoxylin, which is widely used in Indian laboratories
has potential of being used progressively and regressively.
[9] There are a good amount of literature reviews, which
have reported the use of cedarwood oil and lemon oil
as clearing agents.[10] However, research trials using these
solutions in tissue processing, have reported mixed
results. The results of the present study revealed that
at least 8% cedarwood oil provided appreciable tissue
Table 4: Overall comparison of cedarwood oil
with xylene (n=90 comparisons)
Grading Cedarwood
oil
Xylene Chi-square
value
P value
N%N(%)
Adequate 82 91.11 86 95.55
Inadequate 8 0.88 4 0.44 1.429 0.233
Characteristics Cedarwood oil Xylene
Nuclear staining 90 93.3
Cytoplasmic staining 93.3 96.7
Uniformity of staining 93.3 96.7
Figure 1: Photomicrograph showing adequacy and uniformity of
staining. (a) Section which underwent clearing in cedarwood oil.
(b) Section which underwent clearing in xylene (H and E, ×40)
b
a
Table 3: Comparison of adequacy of staining
between cedarwood oil and xylene
(n=30 comparisons)
Staining
characteristics
Adequacy N (%) P value on
Chi-square test
Cedarwood
oil
Xylene
N%N%
Nuclear staining 27 90.0 28 93.3 0.640
Cytoplasmic
staining
28 93.3 29 96.7 0.554
Uniformity 28 93.3 29 96.7 0.554
0
50
100
Cedarwood oil
Xylene
Graph 1: Graphical representation of comparison of adequacy of
staining between cedarwood oil and xylene
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsbm.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 84.30.69.52]
Indu, et al.: Cedar wood oil versus xylene
287 Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine | July 2014 | Vol 5 | Issue 2
staining in terms of clarity and uniformity although this
was expensive than the commonly used counterparts, but
taking into consideration the safety aspects these essential
oils should be recommended for clearing and staining of
tissue sections.
CONCLUSION
The present study shows that xylene free H and E
staining procedure carried out using an essential oil (8%
cedarwood oil) produced quality staining with sufcient
clarity and uniformity of staining. It also has added
advantages of being non‑toxic, non‑inammable and
non‑hazardous and is easy to handle. Nevertheless the
xylene free H and E‑stained sections should also be
evaluated over a considerable period of time to ascertain
its suitability for stability in the staining of tissue sections.
REFERENCES
1. Kandyala R, Raghavendra SP, Rajasekharan ST. Xylene: An overview
of its health hazards and preventive measures. J Oral Maxillofac
Pathol 2010;14:1‑5.
2. Falkeholm L, Grant CA, Magnusson A, Möller E. Xylene‑free
method for histological preparation: A multicentre evaluation. Lab
Invest 2001;81:1213‑21.
3. AnkleMR,JoshiPS.Astudytoevaluatethe ecacyof xylene‑free
hematoxylin and eosin staining procedure as compared to the
conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining: An experimental
study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2011;15:161‑7.
4. MillerJM,MillerMD,DriscollPE,MillerP.Biodegradable,eective
substitute for xylene in the Ehrlich indole procedure. J Clin Microbiol
1994;32:2028‑30.
5. Morgan M. An observation‑Cedarwood oil versus xylene as a
clearing agent. Micscape Magazine Article, 2000. p. 62. Available
from: hp://www.microscopy‑uk.org.uk/mag/artdec00/mmcedar.
html. [Updated on 2000 December; Cited on 2013 May 29]
6. Naigaonkar AV, Burande MD. A Manual of Medical Laboratory
Technology. 5th ed. Pune: Nirali Prakashan; 2008. p. 195.
7. Panda H. Aromatic Plants Cultivation, Processing and Uses.
NewDelhi:AsiaPacicBusinessPress;2009.p.151.
8. Ochei J, Kolhatkar A. Medical Lab Science: Theory and Practice.
New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education; 2000. p. 412.
9. Staining [Internet]. Available from: hp://www.statlab.com/
technical‑prodecures/histology/staining. [Updated on 2002 May 2;
Cited on 2013 May 29].
10. Spencer LT, Bancroft JD. Tissue processing. In: Bancroft JD,
Gamble M, editors. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques.
6th ed., Ch. 6. New York: Churchill‑Livingstone; 2008. p. 86.
How to cite this article: Indu S, Ramesh V, Indu PC, Prashad KV, Pre-
malatha B, Ramadoss K. Comparative efcacy of cedarwood oil and
xylene in hematoxylin and eosin staining procedures: An experimental
study. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2014;5:284-7.
Source of Support: Nil. Conict of Interest: None declared.
[Downloaded free from http://www.jnsbm.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 84.30.69.52]