ArticlePDF Available

Feeling Social Movements: Theoretical Contributions to Social Movement Research on Emotions



Recent literature provides evidence that emotions are intrinsic to the constitution of social movements. The present review examines how scholars theorize emotions in their empirical studies and focuses on the following topics: emotion work, emotional framing, emotional cultures and emotional opportunity structures. The combination of several constructs in the analysis of emotions signals a shift toward integration of preexisting perspectives common in the field of social movements.
Feeling Social Movements: Theoretical Contributions to
Social Movement Research on Emotions
Natalia Ruiz-Junco*
American University
Recent literature provides evidence that emotions are intrinsic to the constitution of social move-
ments. The present review examines how scholars theorize emotions in their empirical studies and
focuses on the following topics: emotion work, emotional framing, emotional cultures and emo-
tional opportunity structures. The combination of several constructs in the analysis of emotions
signals a shift toward integration of preexisting perspectives common in the field of social move-
Durkheim ([1912], 1995) coined the term collective effervescence to signify emerging collec-
tive emotions that transform social life and explained how groups become electrified by
coming together through the enactment of rituals and the utilization of symbols. The
emotions of collective life also piqued the interest of students of collective behavior in
the past century. But, the early collective behavior perspective presented participants in
collective action as being predisposed by their psychological peculiarities to seek solace in
the group or as being carried away by the emotional irrationality of the masses (Klapp
1969; Kornhauser 1959; Le Bon 1960; Ortega y Gasset [1930], 1997). Because the early
studies clearly suggested that movement participants were more emotional and more irra-
tional than those who did not engage in collective action, criticisms mounted with time
and the collective behavior perspective fell from grace (Goodwin et al. 2000; Jasper
By the 1970s the center of analysis shifted dramatically. Scholars were reluctant to
make the same mistakes that plagued the early collective behavior tradition, and thus, for
some decades emotions were virtually erased from studies of social movements. Instead of
focusing on emotions, resource mobilization and political process theorists concentrated
their attention on the mobilization of resources and organizations and the political con-
texts in which mobilizing actors operate. However, they did this work using a particular
angle on rationality. This scholarship emphasized a dominant version of rationality that
appears devoid of emotional components and enmeshed in a Western logic that feminists
have criticized for decades (Ferree and Merrill 2000; Jaggar 1989).
The view of rationality dominant in resource mobilization and political process theories
came under heavy fire as sociologists, anthropologists, and historians exposed its flawed
characterization of the emotional through distinctive contributions to emotion research
(Abu-Lughod 1999; Barbalet 2001; Lutz 1998; Reddy 2001). These perspectives on emo-
tions left behind false premises that hindered progress in social movement research.
Among these premises the supposed irrationality of emotions reigned supreme (Aminzade
and McAdam 2002). Sociologists demonstrated not only that people go about the crea-
tion, management and transformation of emotional states in typically rational ways
Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
(Hochschild 1979, 1983), but also that they do so as a product of unconscious and habit-
ual processes (Katz 1999).
From the late 1990s onward, a parallel move in the literature of social movements pro-
gressively incorporated the new understanding of emotions. This partly responded to the
need to theorize the personal and the increasing influence of feminist and culturalist
frameworks in social movement studies (Goodwin et al. 2000). What have we learned
since then? The last decade has proved fruitful. We now have at our disposal an increas-
ingly rich stock of typologies (Barbalet 2006; Flam 2005; Jasper 1997, 1998). Today we
recognize the fact that feelings and emotions are implicated in all movement dynamics
(Jasper 1998) – from movement emergence (Jasper 1998; Jasper and Poulsen 1995) to
movement disintegration (Adams 2003; Klatch 2004). Specifically, emotions play a role in
the following processes: fostering recruitment (Snow and Benford 1992; Williamson
2011) and preventing involvement in social movements (Norgaard 2006); creating and
enacting collective identities (Einwohner 2006; Flesher Fominaya 2010b; Hunt and
Benford 2004; Taylor and Rupp 2002); and impacting movement outcomes (Einwohner
Given the mounting research since the late 1990s, this review asks two questions in
assessing the degree of theoretical progress in this area. First, what are the main concepts
used in this burgeoning literature? Second, are the theoretical contributions crafted from
preexisting perspectives in the field of social movements and protest, or are they innova-
tions without a previous lineage in the social movements literature?
Theoretical contributions to emotion research in social movement studies
Four major emotion concepts have had the greatest impact in the social movements liter-
ature: emotion work;emotional framing;emotional cultures; and emotional opportunity structures.
Scholars apply the four concepts to study emotional dynamics in social movements, and
sometimes they combine them in empirical studies. However, I will show in this review
that each differs on the analytical ground it covers and on the theoretical presuppositions
that it entails. Emotion work and emotional framing are theoretical twins and are com-
monly combined in the literature. They tend to be applied at a micro-level of analysis
whereas emotional cultures and emotional opportunity structures are both macro-oriented
Since the social constructionist approach to emotions is the most widespread perspec-
tive in the field (Clarke et al. 2006), most of the review will focus on social construction-
ist perspectives that emphasize emotion work, emotional cultures, emotional framing or
some combination of these. Even those scholars of social movements who criticize social
constructionism (Gould 2009; Groves 1997) do not discount its analytical validity in
examining the social dynamics underlying emotions.
The social constructionist literature on emotions in social movements starts with the
premise that people learn cultural norms to interpret their affective states and learn to
name their feelings with specific labels. Some argue that labeling feelings leads people to
create emotional constructs that fix for us the meaning of affects whose discursive label is
not yet overdetermined (Gould 2009). Regardless of the stance on social constructionism
that analysts adopt, however, they generally assume that the fluctuating, ever-shifting and
heterogeneous emotional lava that we experience hardens into feelings that people inter-
pret, name, and oftentimes, subsume under normative feeling rules (Hochschild 1979).
Therefore, these scholars reject the idea that emotions are simply bio-psychological in
nature, and concur that emotions are socially structured and structure social life. But ideas
46 Feeling Social Movements
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
about the social aspects of emotions remain varied in the field. On the one hand, some
argue that emotions in movements are both ‘‘strategic and spontaneous’’ (Robnett 1997,
192) and lead a contingent and often highly volatile life that cannot be reduced to con-
scious strategic management because it is experiential (Groves 1997) and habitus-like in
nature (Gould 2009). On the other hand, much of the literature backs the idea that peo-
ple’s labeling of emotions is a structured social process that involves individuals strategi-
cally managing their emotions (Flam 2000).
Emotion work
The classic formulation of emotion work emphasizes emotion work as the strategic and
conscious management of emotion. Influenced by the sociology of Erving Goffman, Arlie
Hochschild (1979, 1983) first coined the concept of emotion work. She defined emotion
work as ‘‘the act of trying to change in degree or quality an emotion or feeling’’ and dis-
tinguished two forms: ‘‘evocation, in which the cognitive focus is on a desired feeling
which is initially absent, and suppression, in which the cognitive focus is on an undesired
feeling which is initially present’’ (Hochschild 1979; 561). Since then her perspective of
emotional management has gained prominence. Indeed, Hochschild’s idea of emotion
work stands among the most popular with analysts in the area of social movements
(Hercus 1999; Maney et al. 2009; Perry 2002; Reger 2004; Smith and Erickson 1997). In
this section I discuss the application of this concept in the field of social movements and
discuss three forms of emotion work: emotional management, emotional channeling and
emotional harnessing.
First, social movements research examines emotional management by focusing on the
emotional strategies employed by participants in social movements. For example, Smith
and Erickson (1997) analyze how a contemporary environmental group incorporates
emotion management as part of an ideological strategy to guarantee social movement
actors’ compliance. Interestingly, these scholars show how activists use deep acting – the
conscious production of emotional states that one intends to feel – when they canvass to
‘‘sell’’ conviction, thus doing emotional labor – the type of emotion work that companies
extract from workers in the everyday execution of their job duties (Hochschild 1983).
A second type of emotion work discussed in the literature is the channeling of emotion
(Gould 2009; Groves 1997; Jasper 1997; Reger 2004; Summers Effler 2010). On a basic
level, emotional channeling refers to the activity of reshaping certain emotions into other
emotions that are more adequate for the social movement activity at hand; it can, there-
fore, be a crucial factor in movement success. An early account of emotional channeling
comes from Groves (1997). His study of animal rights activism shows that animal rights
activists morphed shame and guilt into hostile emotions. Likewise, Jasper (1997) gives an
account of emotional channeling when he identifies what an anti-nuclear activist called
‘‘attack mode’’ as the channeling of fear into anger or ‘‘a cluster of emotions that activists
try hard to cultivate: inchoate anxieties and fears must be transformed into moral indigna-
tion and anger toward concrete policies and decision-makers.’’ (Jasper 1997, 107)
Similarly, Gould (2009) also explores channeling in her study of ACT UP Chicago.
Specifically, she shows that in the mid-eighties ACT UP activists successfully channeled
grief – visibly embodied and enacted in ACT UP’s vigils and in the quilt demonstrations
of the Names Project Memorial Quilt – into anger. During those years ACT UP’s chan-
neling of despair and other feelings into anger proved remarkably conducive to high
degrees of mobilization. Ironically, the continuity of ACT UP was ultimately compro-
mised some years later when the emotional habitus that the organization developed could
Feeling Social Movements 47
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
not handle despair. As Gould (2009, 396) points out, ‘‘ACT UP’s emotional habitus pro-
hibited despair...’’ This proves that the channeling of emotion can be a double-edged
sword for activists: it can enable movement success but also eventually prevent it.
More recently, Summers Effler (2010) has added an emphasis on temporality to the
analysis of channeling in social movements. Her study of two contemporary movement
organizations, which she calls Catholic Workers and the anti-death penalty group STOP,
shows how the groups constructed different emotional pathways with different temporali-
ties and different emotional strategies. The author discusses a strategy that she dubs emo-
tional slingshooting. This is a form of channeling that the two groups under study enacted
by ‘‘transmuting dangerous negative emotions into negative emotions that they had the
capacity to release’’ (Summers Effler 2010, 116).
The two stages of emotional slingshooting are as follows: first, blocking a negatively
valued, forbidden emotion; and second, channeling it into a manageable emotion, also neg-
atively valued, but whose accumulated negative impact can eventually be undone through
a positively valued emotion. This is how slingshooting worked for each group. First, the
members of the Catholic Worker House needed to block the forbidden emotion of anger
and transmute it into grief; next, they offset grief by evoking positively valued feelings of
Christian agape. Conversely, STOP blocked grief and transmuted it into anger, which they
could eventually let go of by evoking feelings of triumph.
Finally, channeling activities can be facilitated through organizational structures and
processes. For example, Reger (2004) makes a link between channeling and organiza-
tional dynamics such as consciousness-raising. Using her work on the feminist social
movement organization NOW, she demonstrates that the technique of consciousness-
raising has the role of channeling emotions such as anger and estrangement into empow-
erment and collective action.
The last type of emotion work is harnessing. In their analysis of peace organizations’
discursive strategies going back to the Gulf War, Maney et al. (2009) show that peace
movement activists and their opponents engaged in a contentious interaction over the
meaning of emotions, fear in particular. The authors report that peace activists sometimes
harness the dominant emotion work of their targets. They point out, ‘‘harnessing the
dominant discourse constitutes a type of ‘emotional jiu-jitsu,’ whereby rather than trying
to block the potency of authoritative language and ideas, activists embrace the weight of
these potencies to go on the discursive offensive’’ (Maney et al. 2009, 118).
Emotional framing
Emotion work bears a strong theoretical resemblance to emotional framing, a concept
derived from the framing perspective, a constructionist approach to social movements
developed in the mid-eighties. The two approaches have their roots in the sociology of
Erving Goffman: the emotion management perspective draws inspiration from Goff-
man’s work on dramaturgy; the framing perspective, from Frame Analysis. Originally
concerned with the framing of experience (see Ruiz-Junco 2011), the framing perspec-
tive explores the frames or cognitive interpretations that movement participants use to
achieve their goals. This perspective gives importance to the meanings that social
movement participants attach to their actions as much as to the strategic purposes of
those meanings.
Recently this perspective has come under attack on the grounds that it fails to ade-
quately tackle emotions and emotional dynamics (Benford and Snow 2000; Cadena-Roa
2005; Emirbayer and Goldberg 2005; Ferree and Merrill 2000). Framing scholars are
48 Feeling Social Movements
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
addressing some of the problems associated with the exclusion of emotions from the con-
ceptualization of frames by way of the idea of emotional framing.
Emotional framing refers to the framing activities that social movements engage in to
achieve emotional resonance. Schrock et al. (2004) define emotional resonance as ‘‘the
link between targeted recruits’ emotional lives and the emotional messages encoded in
SMO framing.’’ Cadena-Roa’s study of Me
´xico Distrito Federal’s neighborhood move-
ment, organizing around economic justice in urban housing, offers an application of the
concept of emotional framing. This work explores the emotional resonance of movement
frames by focusing on the emotional receptivity of bystanders and potential adherents.
Cadena-Roa (2005, 76) shows that the movement’s created character, Superbarrio, suc-
cessfully promoted the causes of the movement because his performances were consonant
with the cultural and emotional context created and facilitated by the wrestling demon-
strations in which Superbarrio took part.
Social movement researchers frequently interweave emotion work and emotional fram-
ing in their studies. Schrock et al. (2004) give us an example of such articulation. The
authors examine a transgender support group and its relation to transgender social move-
ment organizations to find out how framing affects emotion work. By contrast to particu-
lar transgender groups, the authors note, transgender social movement organizations
strategically frame issues to achieve the goal of emotional resonance. Thus, emotional
framing appears as a dimension of emotion work in the literature.
Emotional cultures
Social movement participants and organizations do not do emotion work and emotional
framing in a cultural vacuum. Instead, the more micro-level activities of emotion work
and emotional framing give rise to collectively reproduced patterns of emotions, or emo-
tional cultures. This section will explore how the emotional culture concept has been
successfully applied in the area of social movements.
Adapting the idea from Hochschild, Taylor (2000, 274) argues that the emotional
culture concept ‘‘include[s] expectations about how members should feel about them-
selves and about dominant groups, as well as how they should manage and express
the feelings evoked by their day-to-day encounters with dominant groups.’’ Taylor
(1995) was the first to introduce this idea in the social movements literature. In her
work on the self-help movement around postpartum depression, Taylor (1996) exam-
ines how women involved in this movement learned to understand a collection of
miscellaneous feelings as postpartum depression by sharing these feelings with others in
the movement. What Taylor’s analysis makes clear is that it was precisely the sharing
of feelings in common that led to the creation of an emotional culture that increased
the women’s commitment to the movement. Similarly, Taylor and Rupp (2002) show
how three feminist transnational organizations do emotion work to form a common
emotional culture.
The notion of outlaw emotions or emotions that are socially deemed as ‘‘conventionally
unacceptable’’ (Jaggar 1989, 160) illuminates a dimension of the idea of emotional culture
in the literature. Outlaw emotions are the result of an oppressive emotional culture with
the potential to constrain the non-normative expression and experience of emotions and
thus to further the domination of particular groups and individuals. Following Jaggar’s
(1989, 160) suggestion that people with subaltern statuses together may build an emo-
tional culture of their own in opposition to the dominant cultural context, scholars of
social movements analyze the impact of oppressive emotional cultures when they examine
Feeling Social Movements 49
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
how outlaw or deviant emotions play a role in activism and in everyday interaction (Groves
1997; Hercus 1999).
For example, Groves (1997) argues that women activists in the animal rights group he
studied were stigmatized for being ‘‘emotional’’ and women; in contrast, the men in that
group by virtue of their gender were not penalized in the same manner. As Groves
(1997, 147) argues, ‘‘Men paid their emotional dues simply in the shame they had to
endure by being in an animal movement. Men’s willingness to express their feelings was
considered a sign of fearlessness, but in women it was a sign of weakness.’’
Lastly, the role of emotional cultures in movement organizations is further elaborated
through the early classification introduced by Jasper (1997) between shared and reciprocal
emotions. Shared emotions involve the common feelings that people have regarding a
particular target or social issue which precedes involvement in a social movement group.
For example, an immigrant to a foreign country may feel enraged at prevalent discrimina-
tion policies that affect her. She may share this feeling with others, but none of them
need to have joined a social movement organization to have the feeling in common.
However, in joining an immigrant rights organization, this person develops reciprocal
emotions with others in the movement group. Thus, reciprocal emotions are always the
product of movement involvement and are a key ingredient of the emotional cultures of
movement groups.
The emotional reciprocity of a shared emotional culture motivates movement partici-
pants to remain involved regardless of social movement outcomes. Reger (2004) makes
the case that participation in consciousness-raising was sufficient for some NOW mem-
bers to take part in organized social action in the organization, because they valued the
reciprocal emotions and emotional culture that they created together. Similarly, Flesher
Fominaya (2010a) demonstrates that participants in the Global Justice Movement in
Madrid valued the emotional reciprocity they felt in the gatherings called asambleas and
that this was a factor in fueling their continued activism despite negative movement
Emotional opportunity structures
The last concept reviewed here moves us to a new terrain in social movement theory,
but, as I will show, it is also connected to earlier ideas. The emotional opportunity con-
cept has its roots in the political process perspective. This perspective studies structural
constraints on collective action, considering them crucial in determining the success or
failure of a movement. Like the framing perspective discussed previously, this perspective
has also been a target of criticism for ignoring the emotional (Goodwin et al. 2000; Jasper
1998). Scholars working from this perspective have responded to this critique by investi-
gating how structural contexts affect movement emotional dynamics.
In her pioneering discussion of emotional opportunities, Nancy Whittier (2001, 250)
explains the idea by arguing that ‘‘the institutions within which the social movement
operates carry their own emotional expectations, permitting and rewarding some feeling
displays and rendering others futile or unintelligible.’’ It is these emotional opportunities
created by the institutional background of social movements that analysts are interested in
discovering. Prior to Whittier, the idea of emotional opportunity structures was intro-
duced under other guises, for instance, under the notion of libidinal opportunity structure.
Goodwin (1997) uses this concept to explain how the Huk movement in the Philippines
suffered a decline in mobilization. Due to its libidinal opportunity structure, the Huk
movement saw its internal solidarity and the salience of its collective identity decrease
50 Feeling Social Movements
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
when its members withdrew emotional energy from the movement to direct it to emo-
tional and sexual relationships. Thus, for the communist rebels Goodwin studied, family
and sexual relationships became more important attachments than communist politics and
the seizure of power.
One important area of inquiry in this literature is the connection between emotional
opportunity structures and emotional cultures. The relation between these concepts can
be summarized in two points. First, social movements must decide how to respond to
changing circumstances in their environments. Thus, emotional opportunity structures
affect the emotion-based discourse of social movements, which is part of their emotional
culture (Woehrle et al. 2008). Woehrle et al. (2008) analyze how emotional opportunities
shape the discursive strategies of movement actors through a study of the peace move-
ment during the period from the Gulf War through the presidency of George W. Bush.
Their study shows that peace movement organizations struggled against ‘‘the Bush admin-
istration’s cultivation of a climate of fear to justify repression of civil liberties at home and
the prosecution of preemptive and aggressive wars abroad’’ (Woehrle et al. 2008, 91). In
response to this context, the organizations discursively contested the emotion of fear and
created alternative signifying practices that foregrounded other emotions.
Second, emotional cultures may directly emerge from given emotional opportunity
structures. Rather than arguing that there is a reciprocal influence between emotional
cultures and their structural environments, Guenther (2009) argues that emotional
opportunity structures determine the creation of emotional cultures. She (Guenther
2009, 356) conceptualizes emotional opportunity structures as ‘‘constituted by the spe-
cific social, economic, and political environments in which organizations operate.’’
Drawing on her study of two feminist movement organizations from Eastern Germany,
she shows that dependence on governmental funding shapes how movement organiza-
tions use emotions to advance their movement-specific goals. Her study renders evi-
dence that feminist organizations with such economic backing from the state are
characterized by ‘‘an emotional opportunity structure that encourages a professionalized
emotional repertoire’’ whereas those without it have an emotional opportunity structure
conducive to ‘‘an expressive emotion culture for maintaining members’ commitment
and thereby survival’’ (Guenther 2009, 342–343). In short, Guenther’s work exemplifies
how emotional opportunities create the circumstances under which particular emotional
cultures flourish.
Mostly focused on social constructionist work, this review has examined the conceptual
tools researchers use to study emotions in social movement contexts. I have found that
the contributions of this literature come mainly from theoretical crosspollination based on
preexisting perspectives in the field of social movements and protest. Some of the most
widespread concepts, such as emotion work, channeling, emotional framing, emotional
cultures, emotional resonance and emotional opportunity structures, stand precisely as a
direct outgrowth of long-standing perspectives in the field, such as framing and political
process. Moreover, these concepts may appear successfully combined in empirical analyses
further showing that the literature is moving in the direction of theoretical integration of
perspectives. Thus, this review also points to some progress in addressing the need for
understanding how emotions intersect with other mobilizing factors and proves that we
are starting to grapple with the deficiencies in dealing with emotions with which our
general theories of social movements have been charged (Goodwin et al. 2001).
Feeling Social Movements 51
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
But there is some unfinished business that demands our attention. Firstly, the literature
still has to transcend the overemphasis on a handful of emotions. Admittedly, this tendency
can be attributed to the complex of the dominant emotion, or ‘‘the publicly expressed feeling
perceived by participants and observers as most prominent in an episode of collective
behavior’’ (Lofland 1991, 39). That is, scholars tend to focus on the emotions that partici-
pants report and previous scholars assess as central to mobilization. It is clear, for example,
that one cannot discount the power of fear,hostility,orjoy (Lofland 1991) and that these
emotions are interrelated in collective action. For instance, Robnett (1997) finds that the
anger of the civil rights movement’s women activists trumped their fear to get involved in
the movement, a crucial factor in explaining their mobilization. But because there is no
concluding evidence that the dominant emotions that have garnered most attention from
scholars are more constitutive to social movements than other emotions, scholars will be
well-advised to expand their analytical lenses to include less investigated emotions.
Empathy is one of the least investigated emotions in this area of research. Although
some have noted the importance of empathy in mobilization (e.g. Flam 2000), we still
lack studies that either provide a full-length analysis of empathic processes in mobilization
and demobilization, or an analysis of how empathy intersects with other emotions and to
what effect. Confusion and courage are other emotions that are poorly studied. William-
son’s (2011) recent study of the Reclaiming movement is an exception in this respect. By
expanding the analysis to how different emotions intersect with each other in emotion
chains across time, Williamson further contributes to our knowledge of the diversity of
emotional dynamics in movement contexts. In sum, we should expand our analytical
reach to tap the full diversity of social movement emotions by zooming in to the least
investigated emotions at the same time that we zoom out to explore the intersections of
several emotions across time.
Secondly, we should scrutinize our methods of researching emotions. In addition to
in-depth interviews and surveys, social movement scholars are using other research meth-
ods to investigate emotions such as ethnography, longitudinal analyses of emotions and
comparative methods (Gould 2009; Maney et al. 2009; Walgrave and Verhulst 2006).
However, more work on the methods of emotion research in social movements is neces-
sary. Practitioners point out the difficulties they encounter in relying on what the study
participants tell them about their emotional states (Adams 2003; Groves 1997). This indi-
cates the need to clarify the methodological dilemmas encountered by practitioners to help
to build further theory in this area. By advancing our methodological strategies, we will
gain more knowledge into the emotional life of social movements and will likely discover
more emotional diversity and more emotional dynamics than were previously known.
I thank Cristina Flesher Fominaya, Gregory Maney, and the anonymous reviewers at Soci-
ology Compass for their helpful feedback on this work.
Short Biography
Natalia Ruiz-Junco is Assistant Professor of Sociology in the Department of Sociology at
American University. She holds degrees from Universidad Complutense and University
of Kentucky. She received her PhD from University of Kentucky. She specializes in
social theory and social movements. Her perspective on social movements is characterized
by a focus on meaning and interpretation. Professor Ruiz-Junco has published several
52 Feeling Social Movements
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
types of work in outlets such as disClosure, Contemporary Sociology, Journal of Contemporary
Ethnography, Studies in Symbolic Interaction, and The Oral History Review.
* Correspondence address: Natalia Ruiz-Junco, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washing-
ton DC, District of Columbia United States 20016. E-mail:
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1999. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA:
University of California Press.
Adams, Jacqueline. 2003. ‘The Bitter End: Emotions at a Movement’s Conclusion.’ Sociological Inquiry 73: 84–113.
Aminzade, Ron and Doug McAdam. 2002. ‘Emotions and Contentious Politics.’ Mobilization 7: 107–09.
Barbalet, Jack. 2001. Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Barbalet, Jack. 2006. ‘Emotions in Politics: From the Ballot to Suicide Terrorism.’ Pp. 31–55 in Emotions, Politics
and Society, edited by Simon Clarke, Paul Hoggett and Simon Thompson. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benford, Robert D. and David A. Snow. 2000. ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and
Assessment.’ Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39.
Cadena-Roa, Jorge. 2005. ‘Strategic Framing, Emotions, and Superbarrio – Mexico City’s Masked Crusader.’
Pp. 69–86 in Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective, edited by Hank Johnston and John A.
Noakes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Clarke, Simon, Paul Hoggett and Simon Thompson. 2006. ‘The Study of Emotion: An Introduction.’ Pp. 3–13 In
Emotions, Politics and Society, edited by Simon Clarke, Paul Hoggett and Simon Thompson. London, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Durkheim, Emile. [1912] 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
Einwohner, Rachel L. 1999. ‘Gender, Class, and Social Movement Outcomes: Identity and Effectiveness in Two
Animal Rights Campaigns.’ Gender & Society 13: 56–76.
Einwohner, Rachel L. 2006. ‘Identity Work and Collective Action in a Repressive Context: Jewish Resistance on
the ‘Aryan Side’ of the Warsaw Ghetto.’ Social Problems 53:38–56.
Emirbayer, Mustafa and Chad A. Goldberg. 2005. ‘Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and Collective Emotions in Contentious
Politics.’ Theory and Society 34: 469–518.
Ferree, Myra Marx and David A. Merrill. 2000. ‘Hot Movements, Cold Cognition: Thinking about Social Move-
ments in Gendered Frames.’ Contemporary Sociology 29: 454–62.
Flam, Helena. 2000. The Emotional Man and the Problem of Collective Action. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Flam, Helena. 2005. ‘Emotions’ Map: A Research Agenda.’ Pp. 19–40 in Emotions and Social Movements, edited by
Helena Flam and Debra King. NY: Routledge.
Flesher Fominaya, Cristina. 2010a. ‘Creating Cohesion from Diversity: The Challenge of Collective Identity For-
mation in the Global Justice Movement.’ Sociological Inquiry 80:3.
Flesher Fominaya, Cristina. 2010b. ‘Collective Identity in Social Movements: Central Concepts and Debates.’ Soci-
ology Compass 4(6): 393–404.
Goodwin, Jeff. 1997. ‘The Libidinal Constitution of a High-Risk Social Movement: Affectual Ties and Solidarity
in the Huk Rebellion, 1946 to 1954.’ American Sociological Review 62: 53–69.
Goodwin, Jeff, James M. Jasper and Francesca Polletta. 2000. ‘The Return of the Repressed: The Fall and Rise of
Emotions in Social Movement Theory.’ Mobilization 5: 65–83.
Goodwin, Jeff, James M. Jasper and Francesca Polletta. 2001. ‘Introduction.’ Pp. 1–24 in Passionate Politics: Emotions and
Social Movements, edited by J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper and F. Polletta. Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press.
Gould, Deborah. 2009. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s Fight Against AIDS. Chicago, ILL: University of
Chicago Press.
Groves, Julian McAllister. 1997. Hearts and Minds: The Controversy over Laboratory Animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple
University Press.
Guenther, Katja. 2009. ‘The Impact of Emotional Opportunities on the Emotion Cultures of Feminist Organiza-
tions.’ Gender & Society 23: 337–62.
Hercus, Cheryl. 1999. ‘Identity, Emotion, and Feminist Collective Action.’ Gender & Society 13: 34–55.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1979. ‘Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.’ American Journal of Sociology
85: 551–75.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University
of California Press.
Feeling Social Movements 53
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
Hunt, Scott A. and Robert D. Benford. 2004. ‘Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment.’ Pp. 433–457 in
The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule and H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK:
Blackwell Publishing.
Jaggar, Alison. 1989. ‘Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology.’ Pp. 145–171 in
Gender Body Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
Jasper, James M. 1997. The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Jasper, James M. 1998. ‘The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions In and Around Social Move-
ments.’ Sociological Forum 13: 397–424.
Jasper, James M. and Jane D. Poulsen. 1995. ‘Recruiting Strangers and Friends: Moral Shocks and Social Networks
in Animal Rights and Anti-Nuclear Protests.’ Social Problems 42: 493–512.
Katz, Jack. 1999. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Klapp, Orrin. 1969. Collective Search for Identity. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Klatch, Rebecca E. 2004. ‘The Underside of Social Movements: The Effects of Destructive Affective Ties.’ Qualita-
tive Sociology 27: 487–509.
Kornhauser, William. 1959. The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, ILL: The Free Press.
Le Bon, Gustave. 1960. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: Viking.
Lofland, John. 1991. Protest: Studies of Collective Behavior and Social Movements. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Lutz, Catherine A. 1998. Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll & Their Challenge to Western
Theory. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Maney, Gregory M., Lynne M. Woehrle and Patrick G. Coy. 2009. ‘Ideological Consistency and Contextual Adap-
tation: U.S. Peace Movement Emotional Work Before and After 9 11.’ American Behavioral Scientist 53: 114–132.
Norgaard, Kari Marie. 2006. ‘ ‘People Want to Protect Themselves a Little Bit’: Emotions, Denial, and Social
Movement Nonparticipation.’ Sociological Inquiry 76: 372–96.
Ortega y Gasset, Jose
´. [1930] 1997. La Rebelio
´n de las Masas. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.
Perry, Elizabeth. 2002. ‘Moving the Masses: Emotion Work in the Chinese Revolution.’ Mobilization 7: 111–28.
Reddy, William M. 2001. The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Reger, Jo. 2004. ‘Organizational ‘Emotion Work’ Through Consciousness-Raising: An Analysis of a Feminist
Organization.’ Qualitative Sociology 27: 205–22.
Robnett, Belinda. 1997. How Long? How Long? African-American Women in the Struggle for Civil Rights. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Ruiz-Junco, Natalia. 2011. ‘ ‘Losing Neutrality in Your Everyday Life:’ Framing Experience and Activist Identity
Construction in the Spanish Environmental Movement.’ Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 40: 713–33.
Schrock, Douglas, Daphne Holden and Lori Reid. 2004. ‘Creating Emotional Resonance: Interpersonal Emotion
Work and Motivational Framing in a Transgender Community.’ Social Problems 51: 61–81.
Smith, Deborah A. and Rebecca J. Erickson. 1997. ‘For Love or Money? Work and Emotional Labor in a Social
Movement Organization.’ Social Perspectives on Emotion 4: 317–46.
Snow, David A. and Robert D. Benford. 1992. ‘Master frames and cycles of protest.’ Pp. 133–155 in Frontiers in Social
Movement Theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. McClurg Mueller. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Summers Effler, Erika. 2010. Laughing Saints and Righteous Heroes. Emotional Rhythms in Social Movement Groups.
Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, Verta. 1995. ‘Watching for Vibes: Bringing Emotions into the Study of Feminist Organizations.’ Pp. 223–
233 in Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women’s Movement, edited by Myra Marx Ferree, Patricia Yancey
Martin. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Taylor, Verta. 1996. Rock-a-by Baby: Feminism, Self-Help, and Postpartum Depression. London, UK: Routledge.
Taylor, Verta. 2000. ‘Emotions and Identity in Women’s Self-Help Movements.’ Pp. 271–299 in Self, Identity, and
Social Movements, edited by Sheldon Stryker, Timothy J. Owens and Robert W. White, Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
Taylor, Verta and Leila J. Rupp. 2002. ‘Loving Internationalism: The Emotion Culture of Transnational Women’s
Organizations, 1888-1945.’ Mobilization 7: 141–58.
Walgrave, Stefaan and Joris Verhulst. 2006. ‘Towards ‘New Emotional Movements’? A Comparative Exploration
into a Specific Movement Type.’ Social Movement Studies 5: 275–304.
Whittier, Nancy. 2001. ‘Emotional Strategies: The Collective Reconstruction and Display of Oppositional Emo-
tions in the Movement Against Child Sexual Abuse.’ Pp. 233–50 in Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Move-
ments, edited by J. Goodwin, J. M. Jasper and F. Polletta. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Williamson, Elizabeth. March 2011. ‘The Magic of Multiple Emotions: The Relationship Between Emotional
Intensity Shifts and Recruiting Training Event Reattendance.’ Sociological Forum 26:1.
Woehrle, Lynne M., Patrick G. Coy and Gregory M. Maney. 2008. Contesting Patriotism: Culture, Power, and
Strategy in the Peace Movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
54 Feeling Social Movements
ª2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Sociology Compass 7/1 (2013): 45–54, 10.1111/soc4.12006
... Una segunda generación de teorías que apareció durante los 1950s y 1960s -como la teoría de la sociedad de masas o la teoría de la privación relativa -, si bien intentaban avanzar sobre las visiones de principios de siglo, también caracterizaban a los activistas como irracionales y emocionales. Más allá de sus diferencias, todas ellas ignoraban tanto las emociones positivas producidas en contextos de acción colectiva, como los factores a nivel mesorecursos, organizaciones, redesque son constitutivos de los movimientos sociales (Jasper 2011, Ruiz-Junco 2013, Goodwin et al. 2000, Gould 2009. ...
... de McAdam (1982), la liberación emocional refiere a la adquisición de la capacidad de grupos subordinados para sentir, nombrar, reconocer y desplegar emociones potencialmente subversivas del status quo tales como enojo o indignación. Por ejemplo, los movimientos de mujeres deben hacer un trabajo para que las mujeres sientan legítimas, y expresen, emociones de indignación y rabia (Flam y King 2005;Ruiz-Junco 2013). ...
Full-text available
Este artículo analiza las emociones durante la participación en el movimiento por la igualdad de derechos de Lesbianas, Gays, Bisexuales, personas Transgénero, Intersexuales y Queer (LGTBIQ) en Argentina y Chile. En base a encuestas aplicadas in situ en su principal marcha anual, buscamos contribuir a la literatura sobre movimientos sociales especificando la relación entre emociones y acción colectiva. Demostramos que las emociones no se distribuyen aleatoriamente entre los manifestantes, sino que son moldeadas por características individuales y nacionales. Entre los manifestantes con mayor compromiso activista y mayor movilización cognitiva encontramos las emociones negativas más intensas.
... Por último, el estudio de las emociones dentro de la participación ciudadana y política ha tomado diferentes vertientes, y cada vez son tenidas más en cuenta; así lo demuestra el desarrollo de conceptos explicativos, como el trabajo emocional, encuadre emocional, cultura emocional y las oportunidades estructurales emocionales (Ruiz-Junco, 2013). Estudios destacan cómo los estados emocionales pueden influir en las actitudes, en el procesamiento de la información y en la conducta política de las personas (Brussino, Alonso y Dreizik, 2013;Guevara y Espinosa, 2014;Hunt, Ergun y Federico, 2008). ...
Full-text available
Este estudio tuvo como propósito explorar las emociones y motivos relevantes en ciudadanos que decidieron votar o abstenerse de votar en la consulta ciudadana “para enjuiciar a expresidentes” efectuada el 1 de agosto de 2021 en México. A partir de una muestra de 394 participantes mayores de edad y habitantes de la Zona Metropolitana de Ciudad de México, se compararon las medias de seis emociones; se utilizó análisis de texto y arboles de decisión para explorar los motivos asociados a dicha conducta. Esperanza, alegría y enojo fueron las emociones que más presentaron quienes decidieron votar. Por su parte, la esperanza y la obligación moral fueron relevantes para clasificar la conducta del voto. Se destaca la importancia de incluir variables emocionales y variables con componentes morales, como la obligación moral, en la explicación de la conducta del voto en consultas populares.
... En esta ocasión no se ofrece una revisión sistemática de la literatura -que se puede encontrar en otros textos (Latorre, 2005;Ruiz Junco, 2013;Flam, 2015; Poma y Gravante, 2017a)-, sino la discusión de algunos conceptos centrales en el desarrollo de esta línea de investigación y su relevancia en la comprensión de diversas experiencias de protesta. ...
Full-text available
El artículo presenta cómo insertar las emociones como variables de análisis en el estudio de los movimientos sociales. Después de aclarar quiénes son nuestro objeto de estudio, es decir, los movimientos sociales y el activismo de base, presentaremos el enfoque sociocultural de las emociones que caracteriza esta línea de estudio. En la parte central del texto se presentarán algunos de los conceptos clave de James M. Jasper, a partir del trabajo más reciente de 2018, evidenciando la solidez de estos conceptos, así como su utilidad a la hora de aplicarlos. Por último, en las conclusiones se compartirán algunas recomendaciones dirigidas a estimular la difusión de esta línea de investigación.
... Across disciplines, the extant literature about activism and coping with racism indicates that resistance includes individual actions both to manage the individual's experience, and to influence social norms. These may include actions aimed to foster collectives and coalitions (e.g., Polletta & Jasper, 2001) and address related barriers to coalitions (e.g., Srivastava, 2005;Tawa et al., 2016); actions to titrate emotional engagement, either catalyzing or managing emotion in the service of collective action (e.g., Rodriguez, 2011;Ruiz-Junco, 2012); or lifestyle changes and indirect everyday aspects of resistance (Haenfler et al., 2012;Turiel, 2003). However, psychological research that examines individuals' engagement with racial social justice action or resistance is rare and may be hampered by a dearth of measures. ...
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate the Resistance and Empowerment Against Racism (REAR) scale. Method: Fifty items developed through processes adapted from Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR) were administered to a sample of 723 women and 230 men of color (Asian Americans, Black Americans, Latinx, and Native Americans). We employed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses using stratified subsamples; examined construct validity of the final REAR scale and subscales; and evaluated 2-week test-retest reliability with a subsample. Results: Analyses supported a four-factor model, including Awareness and Relational Resistance; Participation in Resistance Activities and Organizations; Interpersonal Confrontation; and Leadership for Resistance. The REAR demonstrated good test-retest and internal reliability and construct validity. Conclusions: Use of the REAR may enable researchers and clinicians to examine how people of color proactively respond to racism through empowered action to challenge racism, and how these responses may moderate the negative effects of racism on psychological well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
... Due to the dominant role of rationality in the broader social science research, the least researched attributes of framing have traditionally been emotions and sentiments. However, this has started to change lately with the growing interest in 'emotional framing' (Eyerman, 2005;Raffaelli et al., 2019;Ruiz-Junco, 2013;Snow et al., 2018). This is also the area in which we position our study. ...
Full-text available
Drawing on the literature on framing, we explore the emotional framing differences in radical and reformative NGOs over time. We analyse the sentiment of a sample of 5880 press releases issued by five NGOs positioned differently on the reformative-radical spectrum and examine how they address large companies. Our findings reveal an increasing polarisation of sentiment in these NGOs' framing, with individual NGOs gravitating towards ideal-type radical or reformative positions, respectively. In alignment with the differences in their framing, we observe differences in their approaches to cross-sector partnerships. Policymakers need to note the implications of the observed polarisation for the effectiveness and credibility of cross-sector partnerships and multi-stakeholder initiatives more generally, given the risk of co-optation (for reformative NGOs) as well as the risk of foregoing significant funding and governance opportunities (for radical NGOs). K E Y W O R D S: cross-sector partnerships, framing, NGO-business relationships, radical NGOs, reformative NGOs, sentiment analysis
... •B uilding ac ommunity of change. Effective activism for social justice is the meeting of the heart and mind (Ruiz Junco, 2013). Refill Your Well highlights the importance of finding and building acommunity of activists of colorand allies who share values and lived experiences-this may allow room for growth and greater meaningful change for social justiceagainst racism (Polletta &Jasper, 2001).Working across differences is hard and may sometimes seem impossible. ...
Wir beschäftigen uns mit der Fridays-for-Future-Bewegung und wie diese durch ehrenamtliche beraterische Begleitung in unterschiedlichen Formaten unterstützt werden kann. Ausgehend von Studien, Umfragen und einem Fallbeispiel werden die Motivation der Aktivist:innen und Engagement fördernde sowie hemmende Faktoren beschrieben und drei Thesen entwickelt: (1) Die Covid-19-Pandemie hat das »Containment« ihrer Gruppen massiv beeinträchtigt. (2) Durch ihren kommunikativen Erfolg ist die »Leitdifferenz« zur Gesellschaft geschlossen. (3) Ihr rapides Wachstum erfordert die Klärung, ob und welche organisationalen Strukturen sie brauchen. Wir reflektieren kritisch, was Beratung in diesem Kontext leisten kann und welche Rolle Beratende einnehmen können. Wir zeigen, unter welchen Bedingungen professionelles Arbeiten erfolgreich sein kann.
Full-text available
This article analyses the role of affect and emotions in Finland’s first large-scale anti-deportation protest, the 2017 Right to Live protest in Helsinki. Despite deportation protests having recently gained scholarly attention, their emotional dimensions have not been sufficiently studied, especially as concerns the emotions of protestors with vulnerable legal status. This article is based on in-depth interviews with key activists in the anti-deportation protest network in Finland, including asylum seekers, refugees and Finnish citizens. The article argues that in order for the protest of asylum seekers facing the threat of deportation to become public and visible, it was important that citizens who supported the cause not only offered material assistance but also shared their emotions. The article applies Margaret Wetherell’s theoretical concept of affective practices to analyse interactions between asylum seekers and their supporters, and Sara Ahmed’s circulation of affect and affective economies to explain how affect and emotions played a role in mobilizing protesters and sustaining the protest. The article concludes that the circulation of affect within the network of asylum seekers and supporters produced lasting affective value during the protest and after the protest ended. Strong affective ties enabled the protesters’ network to function effectively in a challenging political climate and despite the network’s lack of formal organization, leadership and shared ideological premises.
In this study, I discuss the affective dynamics in Hong Kong’s anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill movement through examining the emotion and affect surrounding four Lennon Walls in various parts of the city. The Lennon Walls—public spaces decorated with numerous colorful sticky notes—became a hallmark of the 2019 protests. Most of the notes were hand-written spontaneously by passers-by, who used words, phrases, emojis, sketches, and cartoons to communicate information about the protest, frame issues, stir emotions, and charge the movement with affective intensities. I argue that the walls galvanize the population to sense, feel, experience, and act in ways that foster political feelings. Combining textual analysis and ethnographic observations, I show that the walls mediate discursive emotional expressions and non-discursive affective intensities, illustrating the affective dynamics of the movement in terms of its temporality, visibility, and operationality—the concentrated formations of emotion and affect. Together, these orient and move us in social movements by allowing us to feel through our bodily reactions and affective responses and act upon these felt experiences. The walls are able to marshal the resources of the minds and bodies of those who created and sustained them and give rise to political passions and movement actions.
Full-text available
Politics and emotions have always gone together. The German sociologist, Max Weber, famously observed that action in a political community is ‘determined by highly robust motives of fear and hope’ (Weber 1970, p. 79). It is of interest that almost identical statements were expressed at the very beginning of the period of early modern politics. The English statesman and philosopher, Francis Bacon, wrote that ‘civil states’ offer bribes and punishments, ‘employing the predominant affections of fear and hope’, a possibility that arises from the fact that the ‘government of states’ relies upon ‘the government within’ (Bacon 1905, p. 145; emphasis in original). Similarly, the French writer, Jean-François Senault, in De l’Usage des Passions first published in1641 and translated into English only a short time later, wrote: Policy seems to have better intentions than Rhetorick; for when she excites fear or hope in man, by promises or by threats, she endeavours the welfare of particulars (Senault 1671, p. 174).
Full-text available
This article explores the spontaneous and emotional dimensions of social protest and the expressive dimensions of constructing movement identities. It analyzes how a "party mood" that prevailed in a Mexico City social movement organization, the Asamblea de Barrios, created the conditions for the emergence of Superbarrio, a masked crusader for justice who used humor and drama to help the urban poor confront the corruption and mismanagement of the Mexican state. Superbarrio drew on Mexico's culture of wrestling and the wrestling audience's cognitive and emotional responses. He represented an innovation in the movement's action repertories that used the emotional dramaturgy of wrestling for framing purpose. This proved crucial in sustaining effective challenges to the authorities and led to dozens of imitators. This article argues that the public's response to strategic dramaturgy is mediated by the emotions dramatic representations of conflict arouse.
Previous explanations of the Chinese Communist revolution have highlighted (variously) the role of ideology, organization, and/or social structure. While acknowledging the importance of all these factors, this article draws attention to a largely neglected feature of the revolutionary process: the mass mobilization of emotions. Building upon pre-existing traditions of popular protest and political culture, the Communists systematized "emotion work" as part of a conscious strategy of psychological engineering. Attention to the emotional dimensions of mass mobilization was a key ingredient in the Communists' revolutionary victory, distinguishing their approach from that of their Guomindang rivals. Moreover, patterns of emotion work developed during the wartime years lived on in the People's Republic of China, shaping a succession of state-sponsored mass campaigns under Mao. Even in post-Mao China, this legacy continues to exert a powerful influence over the attitudes and actions of state authorities and ordinary citizens alike.
This timely book critically addresses the intersection between power, politics and emotions. Challenging traditional dichotomies which counterpose rationalist to non-rationalist epistemologies, it offers a sustained argument for a more complete and integrated rationalism and helps us understand emotions in contemporary social and political life.
"In private life, we try to induce or suppress love, envy, and anger through deep acting or "emotion work," just as we manage our outer expressions of feeling through surface acting. In trying to bridge a gap between what we feel and what we "ought" to feel, we take guidance from "feeling rules" about what is owing to others in a given situation. Based on our private mutual understandings of feeling rules, we make a "gift exchange" of acts of emotion management. We bow to each other not simply from the waist, but from the heart. But what occurs when emotion work, feeling rules, and the gift of exchange are introduced into the public world of work? In search of the answer, Arlie Russell Hochschild closely examines two groups of public-contact workers: flight attendants and bill collectors. The flight attendant's job is to deliver a service and create further demand for it, to enhance the status of the customer and be "nicer than natural." The bill collector's job is to collect on the service, and if necessary, to deflate the status of the customer by being "nastier than natural." Between these extremes, roughly one-third of American men and one-half of American women hold jobs that call for substantial emotional labor. In many of these jobs, they are trained to accept feeling rules and techniques of emotion management that serve the company's commercial purpose. Just as we have seldom recognized or understood emotional labor, we have not appreciated its cost to those who do it for a living. Like a physical laborer who becomes estranged from what he or she makes, an emotional laborer, such as a flight attendant, can become estranged not only from her own expressions of feeling (her smile is not "her" smile), but also from what she actually feels (her managed friendliness). This estrangement, though a valuable defense against stress, is also an important occupational hazard, because it is through our feelings that we are connected with those around us. On the basis of this book, Hochschild was featured in Key Sociological Thinkers, edited by Rob Stones. This book was also the winner of the Charles Cooley Award in 1983, awarded by the American Sociological Association and received an honorable mention for the C. Wright Mills Award. © 1983, 2003, 2012 by The Regents of the University of California.
Research on the collective identities of social movement participants points to the strong convictions that underlie activism. A great deal of mobilization work involves channeling, transforming, legitimating, and managing emotions. In this article we use the concept of emotion culture, drawn from social constructionist approaches to emotions, to understand how women in the three major transnational women's organizations from the late nineteenth century through the Second World War built solidarity across national boundaries in order to work for women's rights and peace. The analysis focuses on how the gendered emotion culture of the international women's movement promoted a loving community that transcended national rivalries. We identify three socialization processes: (1) staging expressive public rituals of reconciliation between women who stood on opposite sides of national conflicts; (2) forming intense affective ties across national boundaries; and (3) drawing on the emotional template of mother love.