ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of wireless telephone networks around the world, authorities and researchers have paid little attention to the potential harmful effects of mobile phone radiation on wildlife. This paper briefly reviews the available scientific information on this topic and recommends further studies and specific lines of research to confirm or refute the experimental results to date. Controls must be introduced and technology rendered safe for the environment, particularly, threatened species.
Electrosmog and species conservation
Alfonso Balmori
Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Castilla y León, C/Rigoberto Cortejoso, 14, 47071 Valladolid, Spain
HIGHLIGHTS
Studies have shown effects in both animals and plants.
Two thirds of the studies reported ecological effects.
There is little research in this area and further research is needed.
The technology must be safe.
Controls should be introduced to mitigate the possible effects.
abstractarticle info
Article history:
Received 5 May 2014
Received in revised form 14 July 2014
Accepted 16 July 2014
Available online xxxx
Editor: P. Kassomenos
Keywords:
Electrom agnetic radiation
Phone masts
Non thermal effects
Despite the widespread use of wireless telephone networks around the world, authorities and researchers have
paid little attention to the potential harmful effects of mobile phone radiation on wildlife. This paper briey
reviews the available scientic information on this topic and recommends further studies and specic lines of
research to conrm or refute the experimental results to date. Controls must be introduced and technology
rendered safe for the environment, particularly, threatened species.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Since the introduction of wireless telecommunication in the 1990s,
the roll-out of mobile phone networks has led to a massive increase in
environmental exposure to electromagnetic radiation (Levitt and Lai,
2010). The existing standards of public health protection only consider
the effects of short-term thermal exposure; however, biological effects
resulting from electromagnetic radiation might depend on dosage,
including long-term chronic effects, and there is considerable experi-
mental evidence for non-thermal biological effects (Hyland, 2000).
Researchers have also paid little attention to the potential harmful
effects of microwaves from mobile phone mast radiation on wildlife.
In about two thirds of the reviewed studies ecological effects of
RF-EMF were reported, at high as well as at low dosages, linking
the hazards with different modes and extents of exposure (Cucurachi
et al., 2013). Although the species conservation implications are
unclear, current evidence indicates that chronic exposure to electro-
magnetic radiation, at levels that are found in the environment, may
particularly affect the immune, nervous, cardiovascular and reproduc-
tive systems (Balmori, 2009). Animals exposed to radiation emissions
from nearby antennas may suffer changes in the enzyme activities
that disappear when they are moved away from the source (Hässig
et al., 2014), and underlying plausible explanations at the cellular level
have been proposed in the ndings (Pall, 2013).
There are now calls for action from government agencies, both in the
U.S. and Europe. In the U.S. the Director of the Ofce of Environmental
Policy and Compliance of the United States Department of the Interior
sent a letter (Feb, 2014) to the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration in the Department of Commerce which
addressed the Interior Department's concern about the negative impact
of cell tower radiation on the health of migratory birds and other
wildlife. The Interior Department accused the Federal government of
employing outdated radiation standards set by theFederal Communica-
tions Commission (FCC) (United States Department of the Interior,
2014). The European Environment Agency states: «Independent
research into the many unknowns about the biological and ecological
effects of RF are urgently needed, given the global exposure of over
5 billion people and many other species, especially those, like bees
and some birds whose navigation systems are possibly being affected
Science of the Total Environment 496 (2014) 314316
E-mail addresses: abalmorimartinez@gmail.com,balmaral@jcyl.es.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.061
0048-9697/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Science of the Total Environment
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv
by such radiations and effects on breeding of wild birds» (European
Environment Agency, 2013).
The following are some of the potential effects of anthropogenic
electromagnetic radiation on wildlife:
1.1. Effects on behaviour and navigation
Insects and birds are extremely sensitive to electromagnetic elds.
Insects use several senses to forage, detecting visual cues such as colour,
shape, etc., but also oral electric elds can be discriminated by bumble-
bees and this sensory modality may facilitate rapid and dynamic com-
munication between owers and their pollinators (Clarke et al., 2013).
In an electric eld of about 1 V/m, the microwaves may have a disas-
trous impact on a wide range of insects using olfactory and/or visual
memory (i.e., on bees and ants). This experimentally generated electro-
magnetic eld had a realistic (and even lower) power intensity than
those usually encountered by living organisms near phone masts
(Cammaerts et al., 2012), and, for this reason, the insects can be used
as bioindicators to reveal biological effects from some wireless appara-
tus (Cammaerts and Johansson, 2013). The audiograms and spectro-
grams revealed that active mobile phone handsets had a dramatic
impact on the behaviour of the bees, namely, by inducing the worker
piping signal (in natural conditions, worker piping either announces
the swarming process of the bee colony or is a signal of a disturbed
bee colony) (Favre, 2011). The migratory birds (Erithacus rubecula)
are also unable to use their magnetic compass in the presence of
urban electromagnetic noise and fully double-blinded tests document
a reproducible effect of anthropogenic electromagnetic noise on birds
(Engels et al., 2014).
1.2. Effects on distribution and habitat loss
A possible effect of long-term exposure to low-intensity electromag-
netic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of house
sparrows (Passer domesticus) was studied in Belgium and Spain and
both studies reached the same conclusion: fewer house sparrows
were seen at locations where electric elds were stronger (Everaert
and Bauwens, 2007; Balmori and Hallberg, 2007). In large cities, such
as London, a huge decline in some house sparrow populations has
been found in the last 1520 years (De Laet and Summers-Smith,
2007), so thepossible relationship between this decrease and the prolif-
eration and increase in electromagnetic radiation as one of several fac-
tors at play should be thoroughly investigated. In a study looking at
factors associated with extirpation of sage-grouse (Centrocercus sp.), of
the ve variables most associated with extirpated and occupied ranges,
one was the distance to base stations, and this strong association was an
especially interesting result (Wisdom et al., 2011). Bat activity is also
signicantly reduced in habitats exposed to electromagnetic radiation,
which elicit an aversive behavioural response and can be used as a
possible method of discouraging bats from approaching wind turbines
to prevent fatalities (Nicholls and Racey, 2007, 2009).
1.3. Reproduction effects and recruitment reduction
In several research conducted with different animal groups, the
exposure to microwave radiations from mobile phone (GSM) base
stations caused sperm head abnormalities in mammals, and the radia-
tion from a mobile phone decreased the ovarian development in insects,
the amino acid composition changed and the DNA was damaged
(Otitoloju et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2010; Panagopoulos, 2012). However,
other studies have not found effects on the reproductive capacity of
invertebrates exposed to such radiation (Vijver et al., 2013). There are
some scientic views that deny any evidence or possibility of effects
on human reproduction (Lerchl, 2013), which goes against most of
what has been published on this topic (Adams et al., 2014).
In the vicinity of mobile phone base stations, it is possible that micro-
waves are interfering with the reproduction of birds such as storks and
may affect the development and increase the mortality rate of exposed
amphibians (Balmori, 2005, 2010). For instance, in chicken eggs
exposed over the entire incubation period in laboratory, a signicantly
higher percentage of embryo mortality was observed (Batellier et al.,
2008), although other studies have shown lack of adverse effects of
this radiation on rat foetuses (Takahashi et al., 2009).
1.4. Adverse inuence of radio-frequency background on trees and plants
A very limited number of studies have addressed the effects of elec-
tromagnetic radiation on plants. The ndings of these studies indicate
that the effects depend on the plant family, growth stage involved and
the radiation characteristics, among other factors (Jayasanka and
Asaeda, 2013). High-frequency electromagnetic elds alter the chloro-
phyll in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) seedlings and in duckweeds
(Lemna minor) exposed (Sandu et al., 2005; Jayasanka et al., 2013). In
tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum), which were exposed to
low-level (5 V/m) electromagnetic elds for a short period (10 min),
changes were found in the abundance of three specic mRNAs after
exposure, strongly suggesting that they were the direct consequence
of application of radio-frequency elds (Roux et al., 2007). The similar-
ities of the changes to wound responses suggest that this radiation is
perceived by plants asan injurious stimulus and causes them cell stress
in the vicinity of radio-frequency irradiating antennas (Monselise
et al., 2011). On 18 February, 2011, the rst symposium on this
topic, ¨The effect of electromagnetic radiation on trees¨, which presented
results showing disturbing effects on trees, was held in the Netherlands
(http://www.boomaantastingen.nl/).
2. Conclusion
At the present time, there are reasonable grounds for believing that
microwave radiation constitutes an environmental and health hazard. It
is necessary to open specic lines of research to conrm or refute the
experimental results cited above, since similar ndings were obtained
in studies with cattle (Hässig et al., 2014) and humans (Khurana et al.,
2010; Dode et al., 2011; Gómez-Perretta et al., 2013), although
some governmental reports denied that electromagnetic radiation
has adverse effects on human health (e.g. ARPANSA, 2014).
Electromagnetic radiation is among the potential pollutants with an
ability to affect wildlife adversely. It is therefore a new area of enquiry
deserving of immediate funding and research (Levitt and Lai, 2010).
Despite its remarkable expansion in the last twenty years, the rate
of scientic activity on the effects of phone masts on wildlife has
been very small compared with topics like roads, power lines or
wind turbines. The few studies that have been conducted address
the impact of collisions (Longcore et al., 2012, 2013), but not the
second signicant issue associated with phone masts that involves
the effects from non-ionising electromagnetic radiation (United
States Department of the Interior, 2014). Concerning the exposure
to electromagnetic elds, the precautionary principle is needed and
should be applied to protect species from environmental non-
thermal effects (Zinelis, 2010). Controls must be introduced and
technology renderedsafe to the environment, since thisnew ubiquitous
and invisible pollutant could deplete the efforts devoted to species
conservation.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to J.L. Tellería, D.O. Carpenter, R. Carbonell,
S. Wright and two anonymous reviewers for their help and advice.
315A. Balmori / Science of the Total Environment 496 (2014) 314316
References
Adams JA, Galloway TS, Mondal D, Esteves SC, Mathews F. Effect of mobile telephones on
sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int 2014;70:10612.
ARPANSA. Review of radiofrequency health effects research ScienticLiterature
20002012. Technical Report Series No. 164; 2014 [http://www.arpansa.gov.au/
pubs/technicalreports/tr164.pdf (Accessed June 2014)].
Balmori A. Possible effects of electromagnetic elds from phone masts on a population of
white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagn Biol Med 2005;24:10919.
Balmori A. Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology
2009;16:1919.
Balmori A. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: the
city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn Biol Med 2010;29:315.
Balmori A, Ha llberg O. Theurbandeclineofthehousesparrow(Passer domesticus): a
possible linkwith electromagnetic radiation. Electromagn Biol Med 2007;26:14151.
BatellierF, Couty I, Picard D, Brillard JP. Effects of exposing chickeneggs to a cell phone in
callposition over the entire incubation period. Theriogenology 2008;69:73745.
Cammaerts MC, Johan sson O. Ants can be used as bio- indicators to reveal biological
effects of electromagnetic waves from some wireless apparatus. Electromagn Biol
Med 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2013.817336.
Cammaerts MC, De Doncker P, Patris X, Bellens F, Rachidi Z, Cammaerts D. GSM 900 MHz
radiation inhibits ants' association between food sites and encountered cues.
Electromagn Biol Med 2012;31:15165.
Clarke D, Whitney H, Sutton G, Robert D. Detection and learning of oral electric elds by
bumblebees. Science 2013;340:669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230883.
Cucurachi S, Tamis WLM, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJGM, Bolte JFB, de Snoo GR. Areview
of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic elds (RF-EMF). Environ
Int 2013;51:11640.
De Laet J, Summers-Smith JD. The status of the urban house sparrow Passer domesticus in
north-western Europe: a review. J Ornithol 2007;148:2758.
Dode AC, Leao M, Tejo FDA, Gomes AC, Dode DC, Dode MC, et al. Mortality by neoplasia
and cellular telephonebase stations in the Belo Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais
state, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 2011;409:364965.
Engels S, Schneider NL, Lefeldt N, Hein CM, Zapka M, Michalik A, et al. Anthropogenic
electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird.
Nature 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13290.
European Environment Agency. Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution,
innovation. EEA Report No 1/2013; 2013. p. 556 [Available from http://www.eea.eu-
ropa.eu/publications/late-lessons-2 (accesed March 2014)].
Everaert J, Bauwens D. A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone
base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows ( Passer domesticus).
Electromagn Biol Med 2007;26:6372.
Favre D. Mobile phone-induced honeybee worker piping. Apidologie 2011;42:2709.
Gómez-Perretta C, NavarroEA, Segura J, Portolés M. Subjective symptoms related to GSM
radiation from mobile phone base stations: a cross-sectional study. BMJOpen 2013;3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003836.
Hässig M, Wullschleger M, Naegeli HP, Kupper J, Spiess B, Kuster N, et al. Inuence of non
ionizing radiation of base stations on the activity of redox proteins in bovines. BMC
Vet Res 2014;10:136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-136. [http://www.
biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1746-6148-10-136.pdf].
Hyland GJ. Physics and biology of mobile telephony. Lancet 2000;356:18336.
Jayasanka SMDH, Asaeda T. The signicance of microwaves in the environment and its
effect on plants. Environ Rev 2013;22:19.
Jayasanka SMDH, Takashi A, Kimura Y. Short-duration exposure to radiofrequency electro-
magnetic radiation alters the chlorophyll uorescence of duckweeds (Lemna minor).
Electromagn Biol Med 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2013.844705.
Khurana VG, Hardell L, Everaert J, Bortkiewicz A, Carlberg M, Ahonen M. Epidemiological
evidence for a health risk from mo bile phone base stations. Int J Occup Environ
Health 2010;16:2637.
Lerchl A. Electromagnetic pollution: another risk factor for infertility, or a red herring?
Asian J Androl 2013;15:20113.
Levitt BB, Lai H. Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by
cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Environ Rev 2010;18:36995.
Longcore T, Rich C, Mineau P, MacDonald B, Bert DG, Sullivan LM, et al. An estimate of
avian mortality at comm unication towers in the United States an d Canada. PLoS
One 2012;7:e34025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034025.
Longcore T, Rich C, Mineau P, MacDonald B, Bert DG, Sullivan LM, et al. Avian mortality at
communication towers in the United States and Canada: which species, how many,
and where? Biol Conserv 2013;158:4109.
Lu H, Zhou J, Xiong S, Zhao S. Effects of low-intensity microwave radiation on Tribolium
castaneum physiological and biochemical characteristics and survival. J Insect Physiol
2010;56:135661.
Monselise EBI, Levkovitz A, Gottlieb HE, Kost D. Bioassay for assessing cell stress in the
vicinity of radio-frequency irradiating antennas. J Environ Monit 2011;13:18906.
Nicholls B, Racey PA. Bats avoid radar installations: could electromagnetic elds deter
bats from colliding with wind turbines? PLoS One 2007;2:e297. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0000297.
Nicholls B, Racey PA. The aversive effect of electromagnetic radiation on foraging batsa
possible means of discouraging bats from approaching wind turbine s. PLoS One
2009;4:e6246.
Otitoloju AA, Obe IA, Adewale OA, Otubanjo OA, Osunkalu VO. Preliminary study on the
induction of sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to radiofre-
quency radiations from global system for mobile communication base stations. Bull
Environ Contam Toxicol 2010;84:514.
Pall ML. Electromagnetic elds act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to
produce benecial or adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med 2013;17:95865.
Panagopoulos DJ. Effectof microwave exposureon the ovarian development of Drosophila
melanogaster. Cell Biochem Biophys 2012;63:12132.
Roux D, Vian A, Girard S, Bonnet P, Paladian F, Davies E, et al. High frequency (900 MHz)
low amplitude (5Vm 1) electromagnetic eld: a genuine environmental stimulus
that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato. Planta
2007;227:88391.
Sandu DD, Goiceanu IC, Ispas A, Creanga I, Miclaus S,Creanga DE. A preliminary study on
ultra high frequency electromagnetic elds effect on black locust chlorophylls. Acta
Biol Hung 2005;56:10917.
Takahashi S, Imai N, Nabae K, Wake K, Kawai H, Wang J, et al. Lack of adverse effects of
whole-body exposure to a mobile telecommunication electromagnetic eld on the
rat fetus. Radiat Res 2009;173:36272.
United States Department of the Interior. Letter to the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration in the Department of Commerce; 2014 [Available from
http://1.usa.gov/1jn3CZg (accesed March 2014)].
Vijver MG,Bolte JF, Evans TR, Tamis WL, Peijnenburg WJ, Musters CJM, et al. Investigating
short-term exposure to electromagnetic elds on reproductive capacity of inverte-
brates in the eld situation. Electromagn Biol Med 2013;33:218.
Wisdom MJ, Meinke CW, Knick ST, Schroeder MA. Factors associated with extirpation of
Sage-Grouse. In: Knick ST, Connelly JW, editors. Greater Sage-Grouse: ecology and
conservation of a landscape speciesand its habitats. Studiesin Avian BiologyBerkeley,
CA: University of California Press; 2011. p. 45172.
Zinelis SA. The precautionary principle: Radiofrequencyexposures frommobile telephones
and base stations. Environ Health Perspect 2010;117:165663.
316 A. Balmori / Science of the Total Environment 496 (2014) 314316
... Table 1 provides examples of EMF equipment that produce alternating electromagnetic fields, further emphasizing the need for comprehensive research into the potential consequences on health and the environment. It's fascinating how insects and birds are highly sensitive to electromagnetic fields [2], experiencing notable effects on their behavior and navigation. This sensitivity raises concerns about potential risks to species-wide reproduction and an increase in mortality rates in some cases. ...
... Insects and birds are extremely sensitive to electromagnetic field [2]. Particularly adverse effects on their behavior and navigation can be observed. ...
... The capillar diffusion of radio-transmitting devices started sparking questions, and research about possible health effects caused by the non-ionizing radiation [2]. However, research on the biological effect of electromagnetic (EM) waves on the human body shows that high-frequency fields are absorbed in the skin surface and only a small portion of energy penetrates the underlying tissues [3]. ...
... The exposure limit differs across various countries, but the majority of them adopt 41.25 V/m without the frequency range specified in the reference.2 In this frequency range, compliance is determined by the power density limit of 10 W/m 2 , within the reactive near-field zone. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) used as infrastructure in wireless networks has been a trend, thanks to its low cost and high flexibility. Working in many ways including reflective mirrors and phase-shifted surfaces, RIS is able to enhance the coverage in communications and provide more degrees of freedom for sensing. However, the key issue lies in how to place RIS in accordance with the regulations for electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, which requires refined evaluations. In this paper, we first investigate the regulations in terms of E-field. Then, relevant deployment characteristics are evaluated jointly: the minimum distance from the base station (BS) to the RIS, and the minimum height of the RIS are given for a given BS power limit and as a function of the number of RIS elements. The ray-tracing simulations verify the correctness of our analysis. Besides, different frequency ranges (FRs) and radiation patterns of RIS elements are investigated. The results show that the EMF exposure risk is negligible when RIS works in the reflective-only (RO) mode. However, when it works in the beamforming (BO) mode, its placement should be well specified based on our analytical framework to comply with the regulations of E-field limit in general public scenarios. Finally, we provide an E-field measurement methodology and low-cost solutions in terms of general wireless networks and 5G standalone networks, which pave the way for real-world evaluation in future work.
... The non-thermal effects of pulsed radiofrequencies on the health of animals and people are well known (Balmori 2014(Balmori , 2022aKostoff et al., 2020, Levitt et al., 2022a, and radio-tracking equipment can therefore have deleterious effects on the health of animals that carry it (Balmori, 2016(Balmori, ,2023Levitt et al., 2022a,b,c). ...
... Although radio tracking provides great advantages in terms of the study and monitoring of birds and other animals (Sokolov, 2011), it can be a harmful technology, since modulated and/or pulsed radiofrequency fields produce non-thermal effects (Balmori, 2014(Balmori, , 2015(Balmori, , 2023Levitt et al., 2022a, b, c; International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields 2022). Of these, we can highlight the effects on the immune system, on behaviour and habitat use, decreased survival, increased mortality from neoplasia, effects on sperm quality and ovarian development, increases in embryonic mortality and miscarriage rates, biased sex ratios, and disturbances to magnetic compass orientation (Balmori, 2016). ...
Article
Any study carried out with a given technique must avoid causing harmful effects on the experimental subjects, in order to avoid altering the survival rates of the animals or causing bias in the results of the study. Radio tagging is undoubtedly a very useful technique, and in many cases is the only option available to obtain information on the ecology and movements of wild animals, but unfortunately it has been used indiscriminately, without regard to the problems it can cause. The most well-known of these are the effects from the weight of the device and the harness, but there are others that have not yet been taken into account and that have not been sufficiently studied, such as the non-thermal effects of modulated and/or pulsed electromagnetic fields on the health and orientation of radio-tracked animals. This commentary provides a brief overview of the scientific evidence on the effects of electromagnetic fields, and underlines the importance of carrying out relevant studies in order to check for the possible effects of radio transmitters on animals.
... Anthropogenic electromagnetic fields represent a poorly understood, potentially important emission that is increasing in marine environments, possibly disrupting or masking vital environmental cues for electromagnetic-sensitive species [45]. Some authors have warned that anthropogenic electromagnetic fields constitute the fastest-growing form of environmental pollution [46,47] and may be a threat to wildlife orientation [48]. Extended reviews of the effects of man-made electromagnetic fields on animals (including mammals) have recently been published [49,50]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Cetaceans are cast to shore for a large number of reasons, although sometimes it is not clear why. This paper reviews the types and causes of cetacean strandings, focusing on mass strandings that lack a direct scientific explanation. Failure of cetacean orientation due to radiofrequency radiation and alterations in the Earth’s magnetic field produced during solar storms stand out among the proposed causes. This paper proposes the possibility that anthropogenic radiofrequency radiation from military and meteorological radars may also cause these strandings in areas where powerful radars exist. A search of accessible databases of military and meteorological radars in the world was carried out. Research articles on mass live strandings of cetaceans were reviewed to find temporal or spatial patterns in the stranding concentrations along the coast. The data showed certain patterns of spatial and temporal evidence in the stranding concentrations along the coast after radar setup and provided a detailed description of how radars may interfere with cetacean echolocation from a physiological standpoint. Plausible mechanisms, such as interference with echolocation systems or pulse communication systems, are proposed. This work is theoretical, but it leads to a hypothesis that could be empirically tested. Further in-depth studies should be carried out to confirm or reject the proposed hypothesis.
... Las ondas electromagnéticas de tipo no ionizante no cuentan con la suficiente potencia para romper los enlaces atómicos y afectar así el ADN, sin embargo, se ha demostrado que pueden generar calor en las moléculas con las que interactúan y, de este modo, producir enlaces a corrientes eléctricas y vibraciones de clase molecular que a su vez generan alteraciones en los tejidos biológicos (BALMORI, 2014;LUQUÍN-BERGARECHE, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar el fenómeno de la contaminación electromagnética como uno de los factores de vulnerabilidad del derecho a un ambiente sano. Se estudia desde el contexto de incertidumbre científica el problema que deber resolver el Derecho respecto a las evidencias que demuestran que existe un potencial riesgo de afectar la salud humana, y que le exigen a jueces y autoridades ambientales actuar a través de medidas anticipatorias de daños futuros. Para ello, los autores recurren al principio de precaución como el mecanismo diseñado para anticiparse a potenciales riesgos en un contexto de incertidumbre. Para el desarrollo de este trabajo, se utilizó el método inductivo y el análisis documental de textos científicos, normas y jurisprudencia, siguiendo una interpretación sistemática que permitiera contrastar los hallazgos a las realidades propias del derecho ambiental. El artículo concluye que el principio de precaución es un criterio guía útil para regular la exposición a fuentes de contaminación electromagnética en núcleos urbanos densamente poblados, con el fin de proteger de forma preventiva el derecho a un ambiente sano de sus habitantes.
... RF heating of insects has been reviewed in [10][11][12]. Studies not necessarily aimed at investigating the thermal effects of EMF exposure exist as well [13][14][15][16][17][18]. [19] suggests that EM radiation of mobile antennas affects the abundance and composition of wild pollinators. ...
Conference Paper
This paper presents a study of electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure of a honey bee at radio frequencies from 2.5 GHz to 100 GHz using numerical simulations based on the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) technique. The main goal of our study was to estimate the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in honey bee tissues as a dosimetric aid to predict the possible adverse effects caused by EMF energy absorption. In this study, the insect is modeled as a 3-tissue heterogeneous dielectric object, and the Sim4Life EM-FDTD solver was used for EM simulations. The whole-body and brain tissue-averaged SAR values of a honeybee were determined for all considered frequencies and normalized on 1 mW/cm2 incident plane-wave power density. The obtained SAR values were also averaged over a volume of 1 milligram of tissue. The results showed that EMF energy absorption in insects depends on E-field polarization, frequency, and the insect's body peculiarities.
Article
The purpose of this work is to monitor the state of bee health through morphoclinical and laboratory examination of bees on samples of live bees and honeycombs with brood for the prevention and control of diseases in bees in order to include them in a study on the impact of the non-ionizing electromagnetic radiations on bees. Samples were collected during the active season 2023, and morpho-clinically and laboratory examined according to OIE regulations from 9 private apiaries (PH, AG, TR, CL, VN, IS, DB, VL and IF) from which we collected 18 samples. The laboratory results revealed the existence of some diseases in 6 apiaries (66.67%), as follows: a unique evolution (suspected foulbrood disease in one apiary) (11.11%), five apiaries with mixed conditions (55,56%) (varroosis, nosemosis, chalkbrood, and suspected poisoning), and three apiaries were diagnosed as clinically healthy (33.33%). Studying the influence of nonionizing radiation on bees has wider implications for ecology and the environment, as bees play a crucial role in pollination and maintaining ecosystems. The interaction between bees and electromagnetic radiation is a complex and multifactorial issue that may explain the diversity of conclusions in the available studies. Therefore, studies are needed in Romania to better understand the connection between non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation and the decline of bee populations (Collony Colapse Disorder).
Article
Full-text available
This paper discusses the potential health risks and benefits to tagged wildlife from the use of radio tracking, radio telemetry, and related microchip and data-logger technologies used to study, monitor and track mostly wildlife in their native habitats. Domestic pets, especially canids, are briefly discussed as radio-tagging devices are also used on/in them. Radio tracking uses very high frequency (VHF), ultra-high frequency (UHF), and global positioning system (GPS) technologies, including via satellites where platform terminal transmitters (PTTs) are used, as well as geo-locating capabilities using satellites, radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips, and passive integrated responder (PIT) tags, among others. Such tracking technologies have resulted in cutting-edge findings worldwide that have served to protect and better understand the behaviors of myriad wildlife species. As a result, scientists, field researchers, technicians, fish and wildlife biologists and managers, plus wildlife and other veterinarian specialists, frequently opt for its use without fully understanding the ramifications to target species and their behaviors. These include negative physiological effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) to which many nonhuman species are exquisitely sensitive, as well as direct placement/use-attachment impacts from radio collars, transmitters, and implants themselves. This paper provides pertinent studies, suggests best management practices, and compares technologies currently available to those considering and/or using such technologies. The primary focus is on the health and environmental risk/benefit decisions that should come into play, including ethical considerations, along with recommendations for more caution in the wildlife and veterinarian communities before such technologies are used in the first place.
Article
The paper published by Nath et al. (Urban Ecosystems 25:1279–1295, 2022) analyzes the influence of different ecological factors and covariates on House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) abundance but criticizes previous research without explaining in depth the scientific reasons for it and reaches conclusions not supported by the authors’ own data nor by existing knowledge and scientific evidence. They state that studies on the impacts of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) on birds outside laboratory conditions carried out in the past did not consider other ecological factors that could also influence the life history needs of the species. However, precisely the opposite is true; the studies carried out so far, taking into account most of the possible factors to consider, including urbanization, have not been able to solve the enigma of the House Sparrow decline in many of the world's cities. Thus, it is necessary to propose new possible causes not considered so far. Among the few that remain to be tested is the electromagnetic radiation hypothesis, which was proposed by two independent research teams in two different countries. This paper is a reply of the work developed by Nath et al. (Urban Ecosystems 25:1279–1295, 2022) that highlight their inconclusive results and methodological flaws due to the correlation observed between radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and urbanization, complement their results showing negative correlations when testing House Sparrow abundance with electromagnetic radiation levels correcting for the percentage of builtup, and clarify some statements and misconceptions (importance of non-thermal effects).
Article
Full-text available
Humans are exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) from various sources (e.g., mobile and cordless phones, base stations, TV and radio transmitters, wifi adapters). So far, there is no evidence that would indicate that RF-EMF exposure is causing adverse health effects with respect to cancer, sleep disorder, headache, etc. Some results of in vitro and in vivo experiments revealed negative effects on male fertility. When looking at those studies in detail, many problems are identified with respect to correct dosimetry and proper experimental design. This field of research is notoriously difficult for various reasons, and experiments should be planned and performed with experts from the respective areas. The increasing use of devices for wireless communication has given rise to fears that the radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) emitted by such devices (e.g., mobile and wireless phones, wifi adapters) and by their respective base stations cause various adverse health effects.1,2 The list of such alleged effects is virtually endless, including sleep disturbances, headaches, tinnitus, high blood pressure, endocrine disorders, DNA damage, Alzheimer's disease and cancer. The vast majority of the many studies in cells, animals and humans, however, have provided no evidence whatsoever for such connections, even when the maximum allowed exposure levels were exceeded considerably. The discussion about possible health effects by exposure to RF-EMF recently has shifted towards infertility, mainly focusing on males.3 The alleged decline in sperm counts—which is addressed in other contributions in this issue—is believed by some to be caused by RF-EMF emitting devices. Research in this area of research is notoriously difficult and prone to errors. In this paper, some common misunderstandings are addressed; limitations and technical problems are described as well.
Article
Full-text available
Geographic ranges of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison Sage-Grouse (C. minimus) have contracted across large areas in response to habitat loss and detrimental land uses. However, quantitative analyses of the environmental factors most closely associated with range contraction have been lacking, results of which could be highly relevant to conservation planning. This study analyzed differences in twenty-two environmental variables between areas of former range (extirpated range), and areas still occupied by the two species (occupied range). Fifteen of the twenty-two variables, representing a broad spectrum of biotic, abiotic, and anthropogenic conditions, had mean values that were significantly different between extirpated and occupied ranges. Best discrimination between extirpated and occupied ranges, using discriminant function analysis (DFA), was provided by five of these variables: sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) area, elevation, distance to transmission lines, distance to cellular towers, and land ownership. The DFA model was used to estimate the similarity between areas of occupied range with areas where extirpation has occurred. These results have direct relevance to conservation planning.
Article
Full-text available
Background The influence of electromagnetic fields on the health of humans and animals is still an intensively discussed and scientifically investigated issue (Prakt Tierarzt 11:15-20, 2003; Umwelt Medizin Gesellschaft 17:326-332, 2004; J Toxicol Environment Health, Part B 12:572–597, 2009). We are surrounded by numerous electromagnetic fields of variable strength, coming from electronic equipment and its power cords, from high-voltage power lines and from antennas for radio, television and mobile communication. Particularly the latter cause’s controversy, as everyone likes to have good mobile reception at anytime and anywhere, whereas nobody wants to have such a basestation antenna in their proximity. Results In this experiment, the NIR has resulted in changes in the enzyme activities. Certain enzymes were disabled, others enabled by NIR. Furthermore, individual behavior patterns were observed. While certain cows reacted to NIR, others did not react at all, or even inversely. Conclusion The present results coincide with the information from the literature, according to which NIR leads to changes in redox proteins, and that there are individuals who are sensitive to radiation and others that are not. However, the latter could not be distinctly attributed – there are cows that react clearly with one enzyme while they do not react with another enzyme at all, or even the inverse. The study approach of testing ten cows each ten times during three phases has proven to be appropriate. Future studies should however set the post-exposure phase later on.
Article
Full-text available
Mobile phones are owned by most of the adult population worldwide. Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from these devices could potentially affect sperm development and function. Around 14% of couples in high- and middle-income countries have difficulty conceiving, and there are unexplained declines in semen quality reported in several countries. Given the ubiquity of mobile phone use, the potential role of this environmental exposure needs to be clarified. A systematic review was therefore conducted, followed by meta-analysis using random effects models, to determine whether exposure to RF-EMR emitted from mobile phones affects human sperm quality. Participants were from fertility clinic and research centres. The sperm quality outcome measures were motility, viability and concentration, which are the parameters most frequently used in clinical settings to assess fertility. We used ten studies in the meta-analysis, including 1492 samples. Exposure to mobile phones was associated with reduced sperm motility (mean difference − 8.1% (95% CI − 13.1, − 3.2)) and viability (mean difference − 9.1% (95% CI − 18.4, 0.2)), but the effects on concentration were more equivocal. The results were consistent across experimental in vitro and observational in vivo studies. We conclude that pooled results from in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that mobile phone exposure negatively affects sperm quality. Further study is required to determine the full clinical implications for both sub-fertile men and the general population.
Article
Full-text available
We performed a re-analysis of the data from Navarro et al (2003) in which health symptoms related to microwave exposure from mobile phone base stations (BSs) were explored, including data obtained in a retrospective inquiry about fear of exposure from BSs. Cross-sectional study. La Ñora (Murcia), Spain. Participants with known illness in 2003 were subsequently disregarded: 88 participants instead of 101 (in 2003) were analysed. Since weather circumstances can influence exposure, we restricted data to measurements made under similar weather conditions. A statistical method indifferent to the assumption of normality was employed: namely, binary logistic regression for modelling a binary response (eg, suffering fatigue (1) or not (0)), and so exposure was introduced as a predictor variable. This analysis was carried out on a regular basis and bootstrapping (95% percentile method) was used to provide more accurate CIs. The symptoms most related to exposure were lack of appetite (OR=1.58, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.03); lack of concentration (OR=1.54, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.89); irritability (OR=1.51, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.85); and trouble sleeping (OR=1.49, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.84). Changes in -2 log likelihood showed similar results. Concerns about the BSs were strongly related with trouble sleeping (OR =3.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 8.86). The exposure variable remained statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. The bootstrapped values were similar to asymptotic CIs. This study confirms our preliminary results. We observed that the incidence of most of the symptoms was related to exposure levels-independently of the demographic variables and some possible risk factors. Concerns about adverse effects from exposure, despite being strongly related with sleep disturbances, do not influence the direct association between exposure and sleep.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Society is confronted with an increasing number of applications making use of wireless communication. We also notice an increasing awareness about potentially harmful effects of the related electromagnetic fields on living organisms. At present, it is not realistic to expect that wireless communication will decrease or disappear within the near future. That is why we currently are investigating the mechanisms behind these effects and the effectiveness of possible solutions. In order to be efficient and effective, we designed and validated a fast and easy test on ants - these insects being used as a biological model - for revealing the effect of wireless equipments like mobile phones, smartphones, digital enhanced cordless telephone (DECT) phones, WiFi routers and so on. This test includes quantification of ants' locomotion under natural conditions, then in the vicinity of such wireless equipments. Observations, numerical results and statistical results allow detecting any effect of a radiating source on these living organisms.
Article
Wireless technologies are becoming popular due to convenient lower implementation costs and operational costs compared with wired technologies. Various wireless internet and communication technologies, such as worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX) and long-term evolution (LTE), are expanding rapidly. As with mobile phones, all of these technologies operate using high-frequency electromagnetic waves in the microwave category (3 × 102 – 3 × 106 MHz). An increasing number of operators within a geographical area is resulting in high microwave densities in the environment. At the same time, wireless technologies are now utilizing radio frequency electromagnetic radiation of up to 5500 MHz, and frequency spectrum allocation tables indicate that countries have allocated additional high frequencies for broadcasting purposes. Scientists have widely investigated the effects of microwaves on humans and animals, and some findings confirm that such effects exist. In comparison, a very limited number of published studies have addressed the effects of microwaves on plants. The findings of these studies indicate that the effects of microwaves on plants depend on the plant family and growth stage involved as well as the exposure duration, frequency, and power density, among other factors. However, the number of published studies is not yet sufficient to support drawing strong conclusions regarding the effects of microwaves on whole plant communities. Therefore, further studies are necessary to support present findings and uncover new findings.
Article
Electromagnetic noise is emitted everywhere humans use electronic devices. For decades, it has been hotly debated whether man-made electric and magnetic fields affect biological processes, including human health. So far, no putative effect of anthropogenic electromagnetic noise at intensities below the guidelines adopted by the World Health Organization has withstood the test of independent replication under truly blinded experimental conditions. No effect has therefore been widely accepted as scientifically proven. Here we show that migratory birds are unable to use their magnetic compass in the presence of urban electromagnetic noise. When European robins, Erithacus rubecula, were exposed to the background electromagnetic noise present in unscreened wooden huts at the University of Oldenburg campus, they could not orient using their magnetic compass. Their magnetic orientation capabilities reappeared in electrically grounded, aluminium-screened huts, which attenuated electromagnetic noise in the frequency range from 50 kHz to 5 MHz by approximately two orders of magnitude. When the grounding was removed or when broadband electromagnetic noise was deliberately generated inside the screened and grounded huts, the birds again lost their magnetic orientation capabilities. The disruptive effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields is not confined to a narrow frequency band and birds tested far from sources of electromagnetic noise required no screening to orient with their magnetic compass. These fully double-blinded tests document a reproducible effect of anthropogenic electromagnetic noise on the behaviour of an intact vertebrate.
Article
Abstract Plants growing in natural environments are exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emitted by various communication network base stations. The environmental concentration of this radiation is increasing rapidly with the congested deployment of base stations. Although numerous scientific studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of EMR on the physiology of humans and animals, there have been few attempts to investigate the effects of EMR on plants. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the effects of EMR on photosynthesis by investigating the chlorophyll fluorescence (ChF) parameters of duckweed fronds. During the experiment, the fronds were tested with 2, 2.5, 3.5, 5.5 and 8 GHz EMR frequencies, which are not widely studied even though there is a potentially large concentration of these frequencies in the environment. The duckweed fronds were exposed to EMR for 30 min, 1 h and 24 h durations with electric field strength of 45-50 V/m for each frequency. The results indicated that exposure to EMR causes a change in the non-photochemical quenching of the duckweeds. The changes varied with the frequency of the EMR and were time-varying within a particular frequency. The temperature remained unchanged in the duckweed fronds upon exposure to EMR, which confirms that the effect is non-thermal.