ArticlePDF Available

Comparing the efficacy of dates and oxytocin in the management of postpartum hemorrhage

Authors:

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of study was a comparison between dates and oxytocin in prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. In modern obstetrics, general trend to utilize non-aggressive treatment methods that is quite safe, cheap and few symptoms. Date fruit has Calcium, serotonin, tannin, glucose that they are important for bleeding control. Materials and Methods: This study was performed in Imam Reza and Hazrat Zainab Hospitals, Mashhad University of Medical Science. It was clinical trial that was performed on 62 women delivered in hospital. Immediately after placental delivery, 50 gram oral Deglet Noor dates (group 1) and 10 unit of intramuscular oxytocin (group 2) were given. At the same time a Plastic and a cotton sheet were widen under the patients and a pad was placed on the perineum to absorb blood or fluid. All pads were collected until 3 hour after placental delivery and were weighed every one hour. The difference, before and after weight was calculated.( 100 gram increase in weight was considered to be equivalent to 100 ml blood). Result: Blood loss mean in the end of first hour after delivery were significantly different in dates and oxytocin groups (104 ml vs. 141.6 ml, p=0.043), But in second and third hour were not significant, although the bleeding in dates group was less. In whole three hours after delivery the blood loss mean in dates group was significantly less than oxytocin group (162.5 ml vs. 220.7, p=0.02). Conclusions: Use of oral dates after delivery decreases bleeding more than intramuscular oxytocin and it´s a good alternative in normal delivery. Key Words: postpartum haemorrhage, oxytocin, dates

In the name of God
Department of Internal Medicine
Shiraz E-Medical Journal
Vol. 8, No. 2, April 2007

Comparing the Efficacy of Dates and Oxytocin in the Management of
Postpartum Hemorrhage.
§§§
 !"#$%&$!$
 !"#'%&$!(
)*$+$%&$!$
,-..# !"!
$)!-/0120345637(06869(!-:;!
&<!-=7=>>8<!-?<3@=>>@

)   <+   +  A  & <
"    "!   <! (""&     B<
 + .<,!< "!<   
!"!
   ) < +       C ! $
%&$!+!!!+8=+!&!
!!! !& 4> "!."!  2"< 353><  <<!
A2"<=5+"&!     + + <  
   + !   <   !  !< !!  + !! <! 6 < 
!!!&  ++"& <)  +"+ !<!2
3>>"+"+B<&!3>>!!5
 '! !       <  !& + "!    
A"<23>7 ! & 3738!D>>765'<    <+"!<"
!"   "< + !+!<!& ! !  "<
+"!!A"<238=4!&==>@D>>=5
%!!&!"<!AE
"!&!!&
!"#$%!$
64


9&  < =3> !! +
 " < (
" 25      !(
  " <"  37
!!<!!#(
<37>>>>+
<!"    !   3F 235
B<!
+!
 2=5) < (
"   " <  !
  !26(45.
) G! ! #" 
< "  ! ! 
4>>       =7 <
<23485 $ < (
"  <  < 
 <    <
48 +< +" & 
+ +<    :+ :
 235&<  A(
  < ! !  !&
!!   306>    
<!!&+!<
!A!
  "  !& < ! (
& <   ! ! 
!&2@15
!  <
!!!&3>F
8F   +   <  
7>F 205 < < A  
!  !  "
+ & "   
+&  !!  
&  <! + A
 + !  !
 &    ! 
B<!!&  !+(< "
275.#<<!!:"
 A    +  (
3><!!<(
<"!!
!& + +!  20333=5. (
 <  A  (
 < ! ! "
H  &< !<  3>
<  A : !!  !
! < +   "<
!!   + &!
!  "  + 
  285 H  
< " + + (
&  !   (
: "   !! (
 205 9! <!  
!A!<&(
    &" &A 
<  !<  <
<"36    "!
 <!(""&
   B<   
+  "   (
<  $  ! 
$ 9<  "&"  
!!&
 !&   $ 2 
<5&==(=8 $<
    
I +
!& 2375
&   + < 
<!  <  < <
  &!!  +< (
&  !  !  +
:    <   
"  < "
<-
3( . <  ,!< 
 !!    (
!"
! =(. <  < "!<
      < 
65

<  "    ! 
     <!  <<
6( . <  ! < 
"+   !!   
< + & ! !" 
!&!!A&+
<  ! !& 2375.
7()!
"+&<
 +  <  <"
   "  
!&+A(
 +   "!! 
!!&+!

)<+  &(
 !! !  +   +
$ <& !  
  C  8   8=
+!&!
G&4>"."!
 !! 2"< 5 + 3> < (
<<! A 2"< '5  "(
  < "   
("!!&
 (A< ""  ! 
!"     + ."! 
  !" !  ! 
 & +!!
)   <
<+-"+=>(64 
"! 4"!"+
61(7= +: +  !&" < + (
!  ! +" (
+=4>>(7>>>""
    &"  (

 << "  &< (
!& (A  !
!" ! <<  (
 ( A  !" 
 !! !  <  
 "  !& 2( A (
!"!&
<   <  ""   A(
!<   5  < (
"  !"  !
+!! !  < <(
   + ! ! 
+ "< 9& < + !!
63 !   < "<  
<  63 !   +
"<   "    " 
! !  ! !&
4> "  ."!   !! +
"&   < "<  3> <
A    + "< 
   ! & + ! 
< !"  ++""
   <" ! !
 3>> "  3>>> "  
&< <!  < !&
9 "  &+"  
+  !& +  B<!
 3 ! ! '! <  <!
+!<"346>748>3=>
31><!&
      ""
+&+  &
&+  !<" ! (
   !   
&< !& + !!  ) (
&"!
     "
 ! + ! ( 
 + ! <"  ( B<
   + ! +
 <    <<! &
!<"2&335
66


) <!     
  "<  A "< +
  !<" " '$ <
!!<
)!!+"+!
 + "<- "  !&
 <   &! +
&<   !&  <<
 < ! + A(
< A(
&! + " A < 
!&!A+""!
     < "" 
<:" !   !"  <:"
)!3+!!&
<<+"<
"<! <<!&
!&"!"   
&(   "(
  A  <! !(
! !&   + 
+  !"  !&  
A "< 2D>>305 2H"
35
H"3-,&"!"
!!!&+"<
)!3-."!&<+"<
I!
.2D635
#A2D635
I
"25
'$A2'$5
"B<
!"2+:5
.!&B<
G"<2"5
G"!2"5
<!25
$<!<25
9<25
)"3=<25
=77J60K
=8=J71
67J==
611J=@
=1J=8
6>@4J440
468J31>6
=>3J=>
=@21@5
3@24715
723=05
=4J71
=43J=1
63J38
617J37
=0J31
63>>J481
468J1=3
=>3J36
=821615
37274=5
12=415











LJ.D"&M>>4"
67

)!=-,!"!"
+"<

"
#A
2D635
.
2D635
I
LJ.
LJ.
&   
"
("
)("
31>6J011
=6=J=34
10J6=
==1@J
366
63J6>8
10J7



D"&M>>4"
&"(
"("+"<
+
) &"   !"   
< !&  +"<<(
   "   
!"     <   
"< + !   A "<
23>7 ! I 3738 ! D>>765  
   <  !& 
!"    " (
2 < D>>18 
< D>6=05  <    
 "< + !+    
<)&"  ! !"
<" 6 <  !&   +
"< + "  2D>>=5
+!+   "<
A"<238=4!I==>@
!5 H" =  6   !"
      < 
!!6<!&
H"=-,!"&"6<
!&+"<
H"6-HB<<<
!"6<!&+
<"<
&
)     "
 !&  + (
  A  < !"
  " A+
H"=  &"   !"  
 <  ! &"  ! !(
"<"6<!&
!+"<
A"<A
    "  !  (
68

 !"  "!!  (
23>3=345
"!<
    $!  2383@5
<(
  9"& 2315
:<  ! 230085   <"
! A  & 
<  !"  !&205
!2300@5<<
A("!
 !"   !215
) <  <<! "(
A   <   
&+ !<" A ! !" 
 0>>> +2335 ) 
<"+<(
&  A !  &"
< " 2) D 835 
 +    & 
& < "  
+ "!  <  &(
" 2 D 835  2 D
085   + &" "(
A245
 &+!<"3@<(
+(
< <  2 D ==5
"  + &" !
! +  + +
&"  ! <
"    ! +
!<&"2D@5
&" 2 D ==45  2 D
=415!&<2
D 315 !<" "!   (
&   < (
" <   !  : 
<!& !
&  < " 245
! < !   
!" !&
<
. <   
<" "   !& 
 !  . "
<<! !" !&
+!!  < < "
2=>5   + ! (
     !"  
&"
 !"      
<<
 <!<  &!   <!
 2=35 )   <
 ! "  + &!&
3F   +"   ."! 
 2== =65 )     (
!!" !" 2=75
"   A"   +
  !  #! 
2=4=85. !"
     (
=>(,!(
  !!   "- (
"! A  !
2=35 "! !   !
   < <! 
!" ! )A <
!! <<!  &! (
 <  < + (
 &!  A (
 A"     " (
  !" ! 2=35 .  
" ! !:  
!<  < + ! (
< +    + &
      "
!" & ! <(
"! N !& !" A(
&" <  +O ! 
: 235,!<! B< (
 <<!  2=3 =75 )
<<!! 4>! < I
69

>>0"I'3>3"I'=
>==")  3>> " 
 2=65
 !< <&&<<(
<  <  (
&<<(
"    "   
<<A
'(#
) < +  : .  
.$!
)
3(I$:<I)"!
<<<"-
+&?H!G$
=>>8P432=5-41(86
=(H,)!G?B<
Q<"-!
!("!,!9A#(
 !P=>>8-662=5-13(7
6()&(
<"+(
!)? !#=>>=P@8-@4(
@8
7(!.&'
<"-,$NH #
&=>>7(=>>8? !#P
=>>8
4($<"&G
$ !:&"(
<"-"""
!HP=>>8-@6285-3>=4(
1>
8(,<"H &?'!!
G!!==+Q:$,
+(!!=>>4
@(?!!9!R9&!<A(
<!!&<
("R)$+$
<&!3007
1((RA
"!-!!!
!R'?# !300@P3>72@5-@13(8
0(:<?. !R!(
!!!!"<
<"R !
3008I!2@45-787S81
3>(&!!G9!<.,!)
<A
""!<&(
&+&!!!'?
 !3011P04-6(38
33(&!!G9!<.+ $)
'!"!-R<R&<R(
!"!R""!(
<'$?3011P=0@-3=04S36>>
3=(9!#'$G!<
!!&(
<"'?# !300@P
3>7-668(0
36(!"??$"!(
"<"-
B<!!?!P
=>>8$1@245-466(7>
37(. "
)=>>3
34($,.!&!!G?9!<.
!&A
"!2,&+5)
,!<6#A-<(
+3001
38('<"!.!H<,<$
$!&<(
"? !#=>>3P@6-3(8
3@(<+)G$:H<::
$!&<A"
!!?<!#T =>>3P
@4-=64(73
31(.!R&<
A!&<
"R'?<!
!"&3008I!23>65-
3>81(@6
30(!)(
=>>3
=>(.!$!
@$< 301@
=3(.&G$$IG
+!!.! '
3007
==( !<,
.!<<!"(
<!<%9%&(
%93000
=6(.U:)%&
3006
70

=7(!!$H$,!
!!<!&"+
V"< <!
?<!3008P37265-8=0(
860
=4(<!.W$U&+(
<"X+Q:':
3008-6@>(@6
=8(I:,9XV<!<&&!<
!<!(
XH<&"!!
%."<!<9(
,!033>8
Copyright © 2007 by Department of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. All rights reserved.
71
... Dates are a rich source of micronutrients and macronutrients, and per 100 g of dates, contain 64.2 mg of magnesium, 0.5 mg of zinc, 6.03 mg of iron, 70.7 mg of calcium, 864 mg of potassium, and 10.5 µg of vitamin A. This fruit contains serotonin, and natural antioxidants, such as phenolic acid, flavonoids, and tannin [20,21]. Due to its astringent properties, tannin causes contraction in the muscles of the uterus and myometrium [18,22]. ...
... The amount of hemorrhage in the first hour after delivery was significantly lower in the date group than in the oxytocin group. However, this difference was not statistically significant in the second and third hours after delivery [22]. Mojahed et al. investigated the effect of dates on hemorrhage in the first two hours after delivery. ...
... Still, this difference was not statistically significant in the second and third hours after delivery. The total amount of hemorrhage in three hours was significantly lower in the date group than in the control group [22]. Mojahed et al. assessed the effect of date consumption on postpartum hemorrhage. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Postpartum hemorrhage, anemia, and iron deficiency are important health problems. Using safe, cheap, and available methods to reduce the amount of hemorrhage after childbirth can be effective for the mother's health during this period. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of date fruit consumption on the amount of hemorrhage after natural childbirth. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 98 women referred to the maternity ward of Al-Zahra Hospital in Rasht using the available sampling method. The primary outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, measured using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC). Two hours after delivery, 100 g of date fruits were given to the intervention group, and the amount of hemorrhage was recorded during the first 24 h. Comparison between the two groups was done with the Mann-Whitney test with the Hodges-Lehmann estimator and corresponding exact conditional nonparametric confidence interval (CI) as effect estimate. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The median of postpartum hemorrhage after normal delivery in the date and control groups was 35.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 22.0 to 39.8] and 39.0 [IQR: 27.5 to 64.5], respectively. Using the Hodges-Lehmann estimator, on average, the median postpartum hemorrhage in the date group was 9.0 (95% CI: 2.00-18.0) units lower than the control group (P = 0.009). Conclusion: Consumption of dates effectively reduces the amount of hemorrhage after natural childbirth; thus, consuming this fruit during postpartum period is recommended. Also to confirm the findings, it is recommended to conduct similar studies in this field. Trial registration: This trial was registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials; https://www.irct.ir/trial/59197 (IRCT20210607051505N2) on 31/10/2021.
... Due to its astringent properties, tannin causes contraction in the muscles of the uterus and myometrium. Dates also have a laxative effect, which is a stimulus for uterine contractions (23,27). ...
... Khadem et al. compared the amount of hemorrhage in the rst, second, and third hours after delivery in two groups of data and oxytocin recipients. The amount of hemorrhage in the rst hour after delivery was signi cantly lower in the date group than in the oxytocin group, but in the second and third hour after delivery, this difference was not statistically signi cant (27). Mojahed et al. investigated the effect of dates on hemorrhage in the rst two hours after delivery. ...
... In the rst hour after delivery, the amount of hemorrhage in the date group was signi cantly lower than in the oxytocin group, but in the second and third hours after delivery, this difference was not statistically signi cant. The total amount of hemorrhage in three hours was signi cantly lower in the date group than in the control group (27). Mojahed et al. assessed the effect of date consumption on the postpartum hemorrhage. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Postpartum hemorrhage, anemia and iron deficiency are important health problems. Using safe, cheap, and available methods to reduce the amount of hemorrhage after childbirth can be effective for the mother's health during this period. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of the date fruit consumption on the amount of hemorrhage after natural childbirth. Methods This was a randomized clinical trial that was conducted on 98 women who were referred to the maternity ward of Al-Zahra Hospital in Rasht using the available sampling method. The data collection tool included a questionnaire on personal characteristics and fertility and the Pictorial Blood loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC). Two hours after delivery, 100-gram of date fruits was given to the intervention group and the amount of hemorrhage was recorded during the first 24 hours. Data analysis was performed using independent t-tests, Chi-square, Fisher, Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Mann-Whitney tests. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results The mean hemorrhage rate after normal delivery in the two date and control groups was 33.7 ± 16.7 and 50.9 ± 33.3, respectively. The amount of postpartum hemorrhage in the date group was significantly lower than in the control group (P = 0.009). Conclusion Consumption of dates is effective in reducing the amount of hemorrhage after natural childbirth; thus, it is recommended to consume this fruit during the postpartum period. Also to confirm the findings, it is recommended to conduct similar studies in this field. Trial registration This trial was registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials; https://www.irct.ir/trial/59197 (IRCT20210607051505N2) on 31/10/2021.
... Furthermore, these fatty acids are claimed to be involved in prostaglandins production pathways. As a result, dates can positively improve the energy levels and the muscles' strength of the uterus (13,20,26). ...
... Therefore, the administration of approved natural products needs to be performed cautiously and the high levels of accuracy should be considered regarding the appropriate timing of prescription and elimination of high-risk patients. (13,20,26), the acquired results were not the same, which can be attributed to different methods adopted in these studies. In the study performed by Mojahed et al., the intervention group received the medication immediately after placental withdrawal, including the infusion of 20 units of oxytocin in 1,000 ccs of saline with 100 g of Phoenix dactylifera with a glass of warm water, while the controls were administrated with the infusion of 20 units of oxytocin in 1,000 ccs of saline. ...
... The bleeding rate was assessed up to 3 h of postpartum . The results showed that the administration of Phoenix dactylifera was a more effective approach toward reducing the postpartum hemorrhage, in comparison with an intramuscular injection of oxytocin (26). In the study of Yadegari et al., the intervention group was prescribed 100 g Phoenix dactylifera within the first two hours of the post-delivery phase. ...
... Post-delivery trials indicated the beneficial effect of 50 g fruit intake daily by 31 women in the experimental group compared to the group taking oxytocin by assessing blood loss 3 h after delivering their babies (162.5 ml v/s 220.7 ml) (Khadem et al. 2007). The use of this valuable plant was evaluated by Sadeghi et al. (2018) in the postmenopausal period in the form of a date pollen capsule to assess the extent of vaginal lubrification and dyspareunia compared to a control group that received a simple capsule (Sadeghi Goghari et al. 2018). ...
Article
Appraised for being one of the oldest staple nutritive foods mainly in the Arabian Peninsula, the date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.), is a crop native to the subtropical and tropical regions of Southern Asia and Africa. Different parts of the date tree have been extensively studied for their nutritional and therapeutic properties. Despite an array of publications on the date tree, there has been no attempt to compile in a single study the traditional uses, nutritive value, phytochemical profile, the medicinal properties as well as the potential of the different plant parts as a functional food. Therefore, this review endeavors to systematically review the scientific literature to highlight the traditional uses of date fruit and parts around the world, the nutritional profile of several parts and the medicinal properties. A total of 215 studies was retrieved (traditional uses (n = 26), nutritional (n = 52), and medicinal (n = 84)). Scientific articles were further categorized as in vitro (n = 33), in vivo (n = 35), and clinical (n = 16) evidences. Date seeds were found to be effective against E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Aqueous date pollen was used to manage hormonal problems and boost fertility. Palm leaves showed anti-hyperglycemic effects via inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Unlike previous studies, this study highlighted the functional roles of all the plant parts of the palm tree and provided insights into the various mechanism of action of their bioactive compounds. Although scientific shreds of evidence have been growing over the years, there is still a dearth of studies concerning the clinical validation of the date fruit and other plant parts to provide strong evidence on their medicinal uses. In conclusion, P. dactylifera can be regarded as a potent medicinal plant with prophylactic potential and should be further explored to alleviate the burden of both communicable and non-communicable diseases.
... In my study the postpartum hemorrhage was not studied but many studied showed favorable results as compared to oxytocin in terms of bleeding after delivery 8 . ...
Article
Background: Effect of dates on pregnancy outcomes is in debate among researchers for optimum results. Aim: To compare the fetomaternal outcome with and without use of dates in primigravidae presenting at 37-38 weeks Main outcome: The outcome was measured as fetal (Apgar score at 5 min) and maternal (onset and induction of labor) parameters. Study design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, District Headquarter Hospital, Gujranwala Duration of study: 6 months 1st January 2020 to 30th June 2020 Methods: A total of 110 patients reporting to OPD in their first pregnancy between 18 to 35 years of age at 37 to 38 weeks were included whereas multigravidae and those with previous miscarriage were excluded. Consecutive Non Purposive Sampling technique was used and patients were randomly divided in two groups of 55 each. Group A consumed dates in late pregnancy while Group B was asked not to. Duration of first and second stage of labour and Apgar score at 5 minutes were recorded. SPSS version 21 was used to enter and analyze the data. Quantitative variables Apgar score were presented in the form of mean ± SD. Qualitative variables like spontaneous labour, need for induction and good Apgar score were presented in the form of frequency and percentage. Chi-square test was applied to compare spontaneous labour, need for induction, and good Apgar score in both groups. P-value ≤0.05 was taken as significant. Results: The mean apgar score at five minutes was 8.76±1.157. The analysis of qualitative variables showed that spontaneous labor was started in 75(68.2%) of patients and induction was required in 35 (31.8%) patients. There was successful induction in 1 (9.1%) of patients. At five minutes 101(91.8%) of neonates showed good apgar i.e. >7. Both groups were compared among each other in terms of both quantitative and qualitative variables. The onset of spontaneous labor, success of IOL and good apgar score at 5 minutes were compared among groups. The was significant difference among groups A and B in terms of these parameters except good apgar score i.e. p values of 0.008, 0.021 and 0.297 for spontaneous labor, IOL and good apgar scores Good apgar score at 5 min was not statistically significant among any stratification group. Conclusion: The consumption of dates significantly improves the fetomaternal outcomes in primigravida term pregnancies. The results should be validated in large randomized controlled trials. Keywords: Date fruit, Labour outcomes, Labour progression.
... 7 One research study examined a case of consuming 50 g of date fruits in late pregnancy, and revealed that date fruit consumption gave similar benefits as Oxytocin injection, which helps reduce postpartum hemorrhage and involution. 8 Another study showed that the consumption of six date fruits/day during late pregnancy reduced labor duration, increased cervical dilatation, and the rate of natural childbirth. 9 The authors found only one research article on the subject of date fruit consumption and breast milk quantity and infant weight. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Date fruit is a popular natural galactagogue among breastfeeding Muslim mothers. However, there is no evidence to support the effectiveness of date fruit in increasing the quantity of breast milk. Objective: This research aimed to study the effect of date fruit consumption on breast milk quantity and nutritional status of infants. Materials and Methods: This was a parallel randomized controlled trial. Forty-eight pairs of breastfeeding mothers and infants aged 1-3 months were included. The intervention group (n = 25) was asked to consume their normal dietary intake with 10 date fruits/day for 4 weeks. The control group (n = 23) was asked to consume their normal dietary intake without date fruit. Breast milk quantity was measured by using an electric breast pump and recorded for 2 days at baseline, week 2 and 4. The nutritional status of infants was assessed by calculating infant weight-for-age at baseline and week 4. Dietary data were collected at baseline, week 2, and 4, using a 2-day food record. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, t-test Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test by SPSS version 18.0. Results: Breastfeeding mothers who received 10 date fruits/day had an 11% increase in breast milk quantity from baseline to week 2, and a 23% increase from baseline to week 4, (both p < 0.05). The breast milk quantity of the breastfeeding mothers who received date fruits was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). However, there were no differences in infant nutritional status. Conclusions: Date fruit consumption appears to be useful for promoting and increasing breast milk quantity in breastfeeding mothers. Date fruits may be an alternative galactagogue.
... Khadem et al. [58] conducted a study to check the effect of date fruit on a postpartum hemorrhage. Results manifested that the mean of blood loss in the date group was significantly less than the oxytocin group in the entire three hours after delivery. ...
Article
Full-text available
Male and female infertility is a global major health problem. Approximately 15% of couples of reproductive ages are unable to achieve the desired pregnancy within 12 months, despite daily unprotected sexual intercourse and about 10% of infertilities have no specific reason world-wide. Currently, many researchers are interested to investigate the use of natural remedies for preventive and curative purposes of infertility. This review brings together some of the data on the nutritional characteristics of the date palm and its different parts on fertility outcomes and critically evaluates the past and recent literature relevant to the consumption of date fruit against infertility-related problems. Due to its antioxidant potential, dates are considered a functional treatment for reducing the risks of infertility. In males, the date palm has a potent effect on the reproductive parameters including hormonal levels and seminal vesicle parameters as well as sperm motility, count, and viability; whereas, in females, it shows a convincing effect on reproductive parameters including oogenesis process, strengthening of oocytes, regulation of hormones, strengthening of pregnancy, reduction of the need for labor augmentation and postpartum hemorrhage prevention.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Preparation of the cervix and induction of labor is necessary before the onset of labor. In traditional medicine, rose has been used as an effective factor in the onset of labor contractions. However, clinical studies on its efficacy are very rare. This study was done to determine the effect of oral rose-water on cervical ripening in primiparous women. Methods: This study was a randomized clinical trial on 60 primiparous women with 40 weeks of gestation who were assigned to two groups of 30 people of intervention and control using method of intervention blocks. Intervention group consumed five ml of Rose water daily orally since 40 week of gestation for one week and the control group, was received routine care. One, three and seven days after beginning of the intervention and entering the labour, Bishop's score was measured. Data were gathered by a questionnaire form, physical examination, observing and counting fetal movement and check list of rose-water consumption. Data were analyzed using T-tests, analysis of variance and repeated values. Results: The mean age of patients in the intervention and control group was 26.53± 5.16, 26.53± 5.28 respectively. The onset of labor did not show a significant difference in two groups(p=0.303). Analysis of variance in duplicate measurements showed that the mean of Bishop's grade point average on the third and seventh days after beginning of intervention in the two groups did not differ significantly from each other (p =0/160). Also, the results of this test showed that the trend of bishop score changes in both groups was incremental. Conclusion: Consumption of 5 ml of rose-water daily, no significant effect on preparing cervix and was safe. It is recommended for future research to assess the effect of higher dose of rose-water on preparing cervix. and induce labor, compare it with the control group, for future research. Keywords: Delivery, Cervical ripening, Rosewater, Term pregnancy
Article
Bu çalışmanın çıkış noktasını -ikonografik bir değerlendirme olmaksızın- Karatepe emziren anne kabartması ve Leto’nun doğum mitosu özelinde hurma ağacının kadınlar ile olan ilişkisi oluşturur. Hurma ağacının Mezopotamya’da ortaya çıkan varlığı, onun önemli bir besin kaynağı olmasıyla güçlenmiş ve zamanla tek başına ya da tanrısal karakterle ilintili dinsel bir anlam kazanmasına da sebebiyet vermiştir. Bu bağlamda onun, Dumuzi, İnanna/İştar, Mulissu gibi tanrı ve tanrıçalarla yakın bir ilişkiye sahip olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Ne var ki, hem kutsalın kendisi hem de tanrının içinde algılandığı bir ağaç olarak hurmanın özellikle kadınlarla olan ilişkisinin ise çok daha derin bir anlam taşıdığına dair veriler mevcuttur. Mezopotamya yazılı belgelerinin aktardıklarına göre hurma zor doğumlarda kadınlara yardım eden ve aynı zamanda kadının besleyici gücüne katkı sağlayan bir ağaçtır. Diğer yandan dikkat çeken önemli bir nokta ise bu durumun bugünün modern tıp verileriyle de doğrulanmış olmasıdır. Dolayısıyla söylenebilir ki, hem Karatepe’de emziren bir anne kabartmasında, hem de bir Yunan mitosundaki doğum tasvirinde hurmanın görülme sebebi kadim halklarca bunun çoktan tecrübe edilmiş olmasından kaynaklanmaktadır
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.