ArticlePDF Available

BioOne The Human Pollinators of Fruit Crops in Maoxian County, Sichuan, China The Human Pollinators of Fruit Crops in Maoxian County, Sichuan, China A Case Study of the Failure of Pollination Services and Farmers' Adaptation Strategies

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The third dimension of mountain agricultural productivity, pollination, helps to maintain crop productivity and thus makes a great contribution to agricultural economy. In the absence of natural pollinators for a variety of reasons, farmers in Maoxian County of southwestern China employ ''human pollinators'' to pollinate apple and other fruit crops to secure yields. In 2001, we conducted a study to gain an understanding of the process and significance of hand pollination of apples, which revealed that 100% of the apples in Maoxian were hand pollinated. Because it was a unique approach developed by these Chinese farmers the authors were curious to revisit the site in 2011 to assess the sustainability of human pollination and see whether farmers had invented better alternatives. The findings suggest that, recently, Maoxian farmers have been working toward phasing out apples and replacing them with plums, walnuts, and loquats along with vegetables. These new fruit and vegetable crops are economically and ecologically more appropriate to them, because they do not require pollination by humans and also fetch a better price. However, hand pollination by human pollinators is still practiced with apples to a lesser degree, which indicates that all these farmers have yet to find satisfactory alternatives to this economically unsustainable practice.
Content may be subject to copyright.
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research
libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
The Human Pollinators of Fruit Crops in Maoxian County, Sichuan, China
Author(s) :Uma Partap and Tang Ya
Source: Mountain Research and Development, 32(2):176-186. 2012.
Published By: International Mountain Society
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1
URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1
BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and
environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published
by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of
BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries
or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder.
The Human Pollinators of Fruit Crops in Maoxian
County, Sichuan, China
A Case Study of the Failure of Pollination Services and Farmers’ Adaptation Strategies
Uma Partap
1
* and Tang Ya
2
* Corresponding author: upartap@icimod.org
1
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), PO Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal
2
Department of Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Open access article: please credit the authors and the full source.
The third dimension of
mountain agricultural
productivity, pollination,
helps to maintain crop
productivity and thus
makes a great contribution
to agricultural economy. In
the absence of natural
pollinators for a variety of
reasons, farmers in
Maoxian County of southwestern China employ ‘‘human
pollinators’’ to pollinate apple and other fruit crops to secure
yields. In 2001, we conducted a study to gain an understanding
of the process and significance of hand pollination of apples,
which revealed that 100% of the apples in Maoxian were hand
pollinated. Because it was a unique approach developed by
these Chinese farmers the authors were curious to revisit the
site in 2011 to assess the sustainability of human pollination
and see whether farmers had invented better alternatives. The
findings suggest that, recently, Maoxian farmers have been
working toward phasing out apples and replacing them with
plums, walnuts, and loquats along with vegetables. These new
fruit and vegetable crops are economically and ecologically
more appropriate to them, because they do not require
pollination by humans and also fetch a better price. However,
hand pollination by human pollinators is still practiced with
apples to a lesser degree, which indicates that all these farmers
have yet to find satisfactory alternatives to this economically
unsustainable practice.
Keywords: Maoxian; apple; pollination; human pollinators;
China.
Peer-reviewed: March 2012 Accepted: April 2012
Introduction
The importance of pollinators and pollination in
agriculture has been recognized for centuries (Kevan
1991; Buchmann and Nabhan 1996; Kevan and Phillips
2001; Partap 2003; Eardley et al 2006). Results of studies
conducted in different parts of the world have shown that
pollinators make a huge economic contribution to
agriculture (Winston and Scott 1984; Matheson and
Schrader 1987; Pimentel et al 1997; Carreck and Williams
1998; Morse and Calderone 2001; Ruijter 2002). Globally,
the annual contribution of pollinators to agricultural
crops has been estimated at about J153 billion (US$206
billion; Gallai et al 2009). However, in the mountain areas
of South Asia, specifically the Hindu Kush–Himalayan
region, which comprises Afghanistan, Pakistan, India,
China, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, and Myanmar, the lack
of knowledge and understanding about the significance of
crop pollination in sustainable crop production of cross-
pollinated crops and the lack of institutional and farmers’
initiatives to promote managed crop pollination is still a
common feature. The authors of the present paper
reflected on this state of affairs in their review study,
Managed Crop Pollination: The Missing Dimension of Mountain
Agricultural Productivity (Partap and Partap 1997). To
further highlight the scale of the problem of declining
pollinators, failing pollination, falling crop yields, and,
consequently, strained farm economy, we did a field
survey-based study in 2001 on pollination failure that led
to problems in the apple-growing valleys in 5 countries:
India, China, Pakistan, Nepal, and Bhutan. The study
findings reported a growing decline of pollinators and
consequent declining crop yields in apple crops in the
apple valleys of China, India, and Pakistan.
During this survey, we found that, based on their
knowledge and understanding about the problem,
different approaches were adopted by farmers and
institutions in these countries to solve the problem of
pollination with apples. The apple farmers of Pakistan
were not aware of pollination as a factor that determines
productivity and, therefore, farmers who were facing
acute decline in production were cutting the apple trees.
Both apple farmers and institutions in Himachal Pradesh
in India were aware of the problem and applied the
ecologically appropriate solution of using honeybees as
pollinators. In the apple valley of Maoxian, the area of the
present study, the farmers also faced acute problems with
natural apple pollinators and were using a unique,
MountainResearch
Systems knowledge
Mountain Research and Development (MRD)
An international, peer-reviewed open access journal
published by the International Mountain Society (IMS)
www.mrd-journal.org
Mountain Research and Development Vol 32 No 2 May 2012: 176–186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1 ß2012 by the authors176
labor-intensive, and unsustainable technique of hand
pollination by using ‘‘human pollinators,’’ which was a
massive scale effort during the 1990s. It was unimaginable
in all respects, whether it concerned farmers’ knowledge
about pollen source management or pollen harvesting
and processing. The skills and institutional arrangements
of the farming community in Maoxian had evolved to
support hand pollination on this massive scale. The costs
involved also seemed unsustainable compared with the
more appropriate solution of using honeybees and other
bees for pollination.
We, therefore, were curious to revisit these apple
farmers of Maoxian in China after a decade, in 2011,
to determine the conditions that related to human
pollinators of apples and check whether Maoxian farmers
had developed any new innovations as alternatives to
hand pollination of apples and apple farming in the
valley, especially in the context of changes in local
socioeconomic conditions and climate. In particular, we
wanted to see if apples were still pollinated by ‘‘human
pollinators,’’ whether the practice of hand pollination of
apples was sustainable, and whether farmers adapted to
the pollinator crisis by using means other than ‘‘human
pollinators.’
Material and methods
Study area
This study was conducted in the Maoxian County in the
northwestern Sichuan Province of China, between and
31u249–32u1793N; 102u569–104u109E (Figure 1). The
altitude varies from 860 to 5230 m, and the total land area
is 4075 km
2
. Total cultivated land in Maoxian is only
6437 ha, that is, approximately 1.6% of the land area, and
it is largely near villages or along river banks for reasons
of irrigation access. Agriculture continues to be the major
part of economy in the county, even while per capita
cultivated land has dropped to 0.06 ha. The present
agricultural system in Maoxian is characterized by diverse
fruit crops including apple, plum, cherry, loquat, pear,
walnut, peach, etc. and vegetables such as lettuce,
cabbage, tomato, celery, onion, etc. While plums are the
main fruit trees in most orchards at present, apples—the
main crop of the past decades—exist only in some
orchards (Table 1) and contribute only 30% of the total
farm income (Du 1998; Huang and Chen 2003). The
climate is warm temperate. Meteorological data collected
from the county town of Maoxian located at an altitude of
1590 m revealed that the average mean annual
FIGURE 1 Location of study area. (Map by Gauri S. Dangol, ICIMOD)
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1177
TABLE 1 Farming in different villages of Maoxian County, Sichuan Province.
a)
Village
Feng Mao An Xiang Jing Zhou Le Du Ping Tou Shui Xi
Altitude of
the area (m)
1419 1695 1595–1795 1534 1578–1633
Number
HHs
b)
interviewed
per village
11 4 12 7 9 7
Arable land
per HH (ha)
0.26 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.34
Crops planted (% HHs)
Apples only 0 0 0 0 0 12.5
Apples and
plums
50 0 0 0 0 12.5
Apples,
plums, and
cherries
50 0 0 0 0 0
Apples,
vegetables,
and plums
0 100 0 0 0 50
Plums only 0 0 34 0 0 12.5
Plums and
vegetables
0 0 22 100 100 12.5
Plums and
cherries
0 0 11 0 0 0
Plums and
peaches
0 0 11 0 0 0
Plums,
grapes, and
vegetables
0 0 11 0 0 0
Vegetables
only
0 0 11 0 0 0
Average size of orchard (ha)
Apples 0.08 0.16 0 0 0 0.04
Plums 0.16 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.23
Cherries 0.013 0.04 – – –
Loquats ––––––
Peaches ––––––
Number of trees per HH
Apples 50 100 0 0 0 38
Plums 100 67 80 80 125
Cherries 8 –13 –––
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1178
temperature is 11.2uC. July is the warmest month, with a
mean monthly temperature of 20.8uC, and January is the
coldest, with a mean monthly temperature of 0.4uC.
Precipitation varies from 335 to 601 mm, and the mean
annual precipitation is 490 mm, 77% of which falls from
May to September. Mean annual relative humidity is 72%,
ranging from 66% in January to 78% in September, with
little variance throughout the year.
Data collection
A farmers’ survey was conducted in April 2011 in the
same or adjoining villages, including Feng Mao, An Ziang,
Jing Zhou, Le Du, Ping Tou, and Shui Xi, where earlier
studies were carried out in 2001. These villages, located at
different altitudes in the valley, were selected to
determine whether farmers at different altitudes were
facing different degrees of pollination problems and
changes in local climate. The survey questionnaire had
questions about apple farming, pollinators and
pollination issues, hand pollination needs and
management approaches, shifts to other fruit crops,
sources of farm income, better choices, and household
economy. Information (quantitative as well as qualitative)
was gathered from households with different amounts of
land by interviewing any member of the family: husband,
wife, parents, etc. Older family members were specially
Village
Feng Mao An Xiang Jing Zhou Le Du Ping Tou Shui Xi
Average annual HH income (Yuans/mu/y)
Apples 4000 4000 0 0 0 4000
Plums 3000 0 3000 2000 2000 3500
Cherries 3000 0 3600 0 0 0
a)
15 mu 51 ha; Yuans 6.4 5US$1.
b)
HH 5household.
TABLE 1 Continued.
TABLE 2 Pollination of fruit crops by farmers in different villages.
a)
Village
Feng Mao An Xiang Jing Zhou Le Du Ping Tou Shui Xi
Number of
farmers
using human
pollinators
for apples
(%)
100 100 No apples No apples No apples 100
Number of
farmers
using human
pollinators
for cherries
(%)
No cherries 100 No cherries No cherries No cherries
Number of
person days
needed for
pollination of
apples
5–6 5–6 NA
b)
NA NA 2–3
Cost of hiring
human
pollinators
(US$/
person/d)
12.5 7.8–9.4 NA NA NA 15.6–18.75
a)
Yuans 6.4 5US$1.
b)
NA 5not applicable.
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1179
chosen for gathering folk observations about the scale and
pace of changes in agricultural systems and climate. A few
beekeepers in the valley were also interviewed to
understand access to beekeeping as a tool for managing
fruit pollination in the valley and whether farmers are
now using it. Secondary data on population, agriculture,
average land holdings, and meteorology were accessed
from literature and government sources.
Data analysis
Data were analyzed by using simple means and
percentages; no special statistical methods or tests were
used. Where surveys were conducted in different villages,
overall averages for each village were used without being
weighted for numbers of respondents.
Results and discussion
The status of human pollinators
Findings revealed that farmers continue to use human
pollinators for hand pollination of apples, although at a
reduced scale (Table 2). During the apple flowering
season of 2011, countless numbers of people were seen
working as human pollinators, pollinating apple
orchards in the valley in some areas (Figure 2). Although
those farmers with smaller orchards pollinated their
trees themselves, the larger orchard owners employed
laborers for this purpose. Hand pollination of apples in
Maoxianonalargescalehasbeenpromotedsincethe
late 1980s, and it was in its peak during the 1990s until
the early 2000s. The findings revealed that, due to
declining productivity and the falling price of apples as
well as increased production costs particularly owing to
the continuing need for hand pollination and rising
costs and scarcity of labor (human pollinators), there
has been a continuing decline in the contribution of
apples to the household economy of Maoxian farmers.
Apples are no longer the number one crop in the
valley.
Problems that relate to pollination of apples were
further compounded during this decade (2001–2011).
With apples, pollination has to be accomplished within
5 days of blossoming. However, due to the migration of
farm labor from the area, apple farmers are facing a
serious scarcity of human pollinators. To cope with this
FIGURE 2 Farmers pollinating apple flowers in Feng Mao village. (Photo by Uma Partap)
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1180
scarcity, farmers were hiring labor from other areas,
which further escalated the cost of apple pollination.
Usually, apple owners themselves collect and process
flowers to build pollen stock, and the hired labor is
engaged only for hand pollination. A person can pollinate
5–10 trees a day, depending on the size of the trees.
Farmers pay the human pollinators US$12–19/person/d.
They still believe that hand pollination is the only
solution if they continue to grow apples.
Why Maoxian farmers needed human pollinators for apples
Our study indicated that an insufficient proportion of
pollinizer trees in the orchards and the declining
populations of natural insect pollinators in the
surrounding localities have created a perpetual need for
human pollinators in the apple orchards of Maoxian
County. Visits to different villages and discussions with
farmers revealed that there is a shortage of pollinators
left in the area now to ensure adequate natural
pollination of apple trees. About 4 decades of pesticide
sprays by the farmers, 8 to 10 sprays of pesticides per
season (Table 3), have contributed to a serious decline in
pollinators (Partap and Partap 2002). That pesticide use
is a major factor contributing to pollinator decline has
been reported in several studies conducted in other parts
of the world (Johansen 1977; Allen-Wardell et al 1998;
Verma and Partap 1994; Partap and Partap 2002; Berezin
and Beiko 2002).
The valley is also experiencing shrinking pollinator
habitats due to a continuing increase in farmland area, at
the cost of forests and grasslands. Results of several
studies carried out in different parts of the world (Partap
and Partap 2002; Aizen and Feinsinger 1994; Cane 2001;
Berezin and Beiko 2002; Kremen et al 2002) revealed
habitat loss as another very important cause of decline in
pollinator populations. In Maoxian, loss of habitat that
resulted in a decline in natural pollinator populations is
driving the need for hand pollination. Our findings show
that, in some areas of Maoxian, where natural vegetation
is well preserved and pollinators are abundant,
pollination of apples occurs naturally, which eliminated
the need for hand pollination.
Furthermore, many commercial varieties of apples
planted in Maoxian are self-sterile and require cross-
pollination by pollen from a compatible variety (a
pollinizer). The need for planting adequate proportions
of compatible pollinizer trees in apple orchards among
the commercial varieties has been reported in earlier
studies (McGregor 1976; Free 1993). Liu and Zhang (2002)
also attributed poor pollination of fruit crops in Maoxian
to inappropriate placement of fruiting and pollinizer
varieties, in addition to a low proportion of pollinizers.
TABLE 3 Use of pesticides by farmers.
a)
Village
Feng Mao An Xiang Jing Zhou Le Du Ping Tou Shui Xi
Number of
farmers using
pesticides (%)
100 100 100 100 100 100
Number of
pesticide sprays
per year
888888
Types of
pesticides used
Insecticides,
fungicides,
bactericides
Insecticides,
fungicides,
bactericides
NA
b)
NA NA Insecticides,
fungicides,
bactericides
Time of pesticide
sprays
Before and
after
flowering,
not during
flowering
Before and
after
flowering;
not during
flowering
NA NA NA Before and
after
flowering;
not during
flowering
Farmers’ awareness level about the harmful effect of pesticides on pollinators (%)
Pesticides kill
pollinators
50 100 44 100 75
Pesticides do not
kill pollinators
50 – – – –
Do not know 56 – 100 25
a)
All the farmers use pesticides on apples, cherries, plums, and vegetables.
b)
NA 5information not available.
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1181
Scientists recommend planting 25–33% pollinizer trees
among the main variety for a satisfactory crop (Jindal and
Gautam 2004). However, in most fruit orchards in
Maoxian, pollinizer trees account for less than 10% of the
trees. However, because land holdings are small in
Maoxian, farmers do not want to plant pollinizer trees in
their orchards because they have a low market value. The
most obvious reason for this was the fact that the fruit
produced by many of these pollinizer varieties has a low
market value.
Analysis of our findings revealed that hand pollination
of apples was driven by both ecological and economic
considerations; ecological consideration, because
pollination is a limiting factor in crop productivity; and
economic, because apples were the main cash crop in the
area. As mentioned earlier, pollinators that used to
provide pollination services to crops in Maoxian are
declining; and pollination as a free service provided by
nature is no longer available free of charge. Therefore, it
is necessary to increase pollinator intensity in the fields
and orchards to ensure proper pollination: the ‘‘ecological
dimension of crop productivity.’
The intensity of pollinators in the orchards can be
increased by using colonies of honeybees such as Apis
TABLE 4 Beekeeping and use of honeybees by farmers for pollination of apples and other crops.
a)
Village
Feng Mao An Xiang Jing Zhou Le Du Ping Tou Shui Xi
Number of
farmers
keeping
honeybees
(%)
50 50 11 0 0 12.5
Number of
colonies per
HH
b)
6 2 2 (however, 1
beekeeper had
nearly 100 Apis
cerana colonies,
whereas another
had about 20)
––3
Purpose of
beekeeping
Honey
production
Honey
production
Honey production
(also rented for
pollination a few
years earlier)
– Honey
production
Number of
farmers
renting
honeybees
for
pollination
(%)
There is no practice of renting honeybees for pollination.
Number of
beekeepers
renting bees
for
pollination
Only 2 or 3 beekeepers in the whole valley sometimes rent bees to farmers for pollination; renting colonies is not a
regular practice.
Cost of
renting bee
colonies
(Yuans/
colony/
season)
Rented 40 colonies for the pollination of cherry in 2010 at the rate of Yuans 300 (US$46.88) per day for 12 days,
ie Yuans 90 (US$14.06)/colony/season.
If not, why
they do not
rent the bees
to farmers
Even though farmers offer good money, beekeepers are not interested in renting their bees for pollination because
farmers use lots of pesticides that kill the bees, and they do not pay for any loss of bees.
a)
Yuans 6.4 5US$1.
b)
HH 5household.
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1182
cerana and Apis mellifera because they are known to be most
effective as providers of pollination for agricultural crops
(McGregor 1976; Deodikar and Suryanarayana 1977;
Dulta and Verma 1987; Free 1993; Gupta et al 1993;
Partap and Verma 1994; Singh et al 2000). The local
government of Maoxian County tried but failed to
promote beekeeping for pollination. It was not a pleasant
experience for the beekeepers, either. They lost many
colonies due to heavy pesticide use by farmers and were
not compensated for the loss. This acted as a discouraging
factor in facilitating the use of ecologically and
economically sustainable methods of apple pollination.
Consequently, hand pollination remained the only option
that farmers knew (Table 4). Moreover, because apples
had an important role in the economy of the area, it was
important to make efforts to ensure the yield and quality
of this crop. With no other option available for ensuring
pollination, hand pollination was promoted to secure
yield and fruit quality.
Why Maoxian farmers are adopting alternatives to
apple farming
Large-scale community-based hand pollination of apples
and other fruit crops is unique to China. However,
farmers and institutions have begun to believe that it is
not a sustainable option, as revealed by the findings of
this study. The increasing costs of hand pollination
compared with the low income from apples have forced
Maoxian farmers to look for alternative farming options.
Migration of local people (human pollinators of apples) to
cities in search of better jobs has led to increased labor
scarcity and has multiplied the cost by a factor of
approximately 10. Although, in 2000, human pollinators
were available for US$2/person/d, presently, the cost of
FIGURE 3 (A) Change in mean annual precipitation in Songpan from 1950 to 2010; (B) change in mean annual temperature in Songpan from 1950 to 2010.
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1183
hiring them varies from US$12–19/person/d, which has
led to a substantial increase in the cost of producing
apples. This, coupled with the falling market prices for
Maoxian apples, has been the key factor that compelled
farmers to look for other crops.
Our study revealed that climate change–induced
changes in local weather have resulted in frequent
rains, low temperatures and cloudy weather, as
observed in Maoxian County during the apple
flowering season, which delays flowering and also
affects pollination by natural pollinators where they
are present (Partap and Partap 2002; Tang et al 2003).
Most of the responding farmers reported fluctuations
in local weather. The striking feature of the local
weather changes was that temperature changed within
a short time, from very hot to very cold or vice versa.
Snowfall has been decreasing, but freezing rains have
increased; the time of snowfall has also changed.
Another change was an increase in precipitation during
the month of April, which caused continuing low
temperatures in spring. The reports from a weather
station also indicate an increase in mean annual
precipitation and mean annual temperature
(Figure 3A, B). Research conducted elsewhere by Fitter
and Fitter (2002) and Miller et al (2007) showed that
weather is the key factor that influences pollination of
crops. Abnormal weather, such as cold temperatures,
rain, and hailstorms, during the blooming period can
negatively affect pollination. Temperature is reported
to have a large impact on pollination interactions and
is known to affect flowering in crops and plants (Arft et
al 1999; Inouye et al 2003). Air temperature of 17–18uC
is considered optimal for apple flower blooming.
Therefore, weather has also been a significant
contributing factor in farmers’ decision-making about the
use of human pollinators. In clear weather, one-time hand
pollination is sufficient, and hired laborers work for just 1
or 2 days but under cold and cloudy weather conditions.
When the blooming period lengthens, repetitive
pollination is necessary, which requires more days for
human pollinators, which adds to the cost of managed
pollination. The present findings reveal that fluctuation
in local weather wherever human pollination is still
practiced, has led to the hiring of more human pollinators
so as to accomplish the pollination task in fewer days.
Changes in weather have thus become another key factor
FIGURE 4 Mixed fruit farming in study area. An orchard with apples, cherries, plums, loquats, and vegetables in Feng Mao village. (Photo by Uma Parta p)
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1184
that contributes to the necessity of maintaining hand
pollination of apples, with the accompanying increase in
input costs.
Farmers’ innovations in adaptive strategies
In answer to the question of how farmers are adapting to
the pollination crisis in the face of the increasing costs for
human pollinators and climate change, our findings
revealed that a major shift in the cropping pattern is
occurring in the area. Apples, the major cash crop of the
area in 2001, are now being phased out. Farmers are
replacing them with other fruit crops, such as plum,
loquat, and walnut. Many farmers have already replaced
apples; others are in the process of doing so. As a result,
mixed plantation orchards have become a common sight
in the area (Figure 4). Apples have been completely
phased out from Jing Zhou, Le Du, and Ping Tou, 3 of the
6 villages where this study was undertaken (Table 2).
Discussions with farmers revealed that the increasing
costs of production, including for human pollinators,
were one of the reasons that led farmers to replace apples
by alternative self-pollinated fruit crops.
This shift in fruit crop farming includes both
ecological and economic considerations. In the present
decade, the farm gate price of apples has dropped
substantially, to between just US$0.16/kg and 0.19/kg, but
production costs have continued to rise. However, other
fruits fetched better prices, for example, plums, US$1.9–
2.5/kg; cherries, US$4.7–6.3/kg; and loquat, US$1.6–2.3/kg.
Moreover, the cost of production of these crops is much
lower compared with apples, and they produce good
yields without being essentially cross-pollinated.
Therefore, investment in human pollinators is not
required, and farmers do not have to worry about finding
pollinators. To increase their farm income, farmers also
adopted intercropping of vegetables, such as lettuce,
cabbage, Chinese cabbage, tomato, celery, and onion,
along with other fruit trees, which shows that, in this
mountain valley of Maoxian, both ecological and
economic factors combined to encourage farmers to
innovate by finding new ways of cropping and suitable
crops to sustain their livelihood.
Conclusion
For apple farmers in Maoxian, pollination continues to be
a limiting factor in productivity, and managing it through
human pollinators has been upsetting the cost–benefit
ratio of apple farming. By 2011, apple farming and the use
of human pollinators had been considerably reduced in
the valley and is now limited only to those villages or areas
where farmers either have not been able to find suitable
alternative options or those nearer the forest areas that
still benefit from some degree of natural pollinators.
Changes in fruit farming from apples, a crop that
essentially requires cross-pollination, to fruit crops and
vegetable crops that are not necessarily cross-pollinated,
are part of the farmers’ adaptation strategy.
The clear message of this study is that pollination is a
key factor in apple productivity and pollinators are
essential in providing this service. Therefore, other areas
dependent on the apple economy need to ensure that
pollination is well understood as a key limiting factor in
productivity and that steps are taken to manage it in
sustainable ways that maintain populations of pollinators
and their habitats rather than adopting unsustainable
techniques such as human pollinators.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are extremely grateful to Dr Michael Kollmair, programme manager,
Sustainable Livelihood and Poverty Reduction Programme of ICIMOD for
his constant support and encouragement to carry out this study. We are
highly thankful to Dr Tej Partap, vice chancellor, Sher-e-Kashmir Univer sity
of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Kashmir, for critically reading
the manuscript and providing suggestions that helped in improving it.
Inputs provided by my colleague Mr Min B. Gurung in planning this study
is gratefully acknowledged. We very much appreciate assistance in field
survey from Chen Xian, Li Chunyan, Xie Zhenghua, and Chen Mingsheng.
Financial support provided by the Government of Austria’s Ministry of Foreign
Affairs through the Austrian Development Agency is thankfully
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
Aizen MA, Feinsinger P. 1994. Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and
feral honeybees in Argentine Chaco Serrano. Ecological Applications 4:378–392.
Allen-Wardell GP, Bernhardt R, Bitner A. 1998. The potential consequences of
pollinator declines on conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop
yields. Conservation Biology 12:8–17.
Arft AM, Walker MD, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret Harte MS, Dale M. 1999.
Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: Meta analysis of tundra
experiment. Ecology Monograph 69:491–511.
Berezin MV,Beiko VB.2002, Problems of conservation and sustainable use of
native bees in Russia. In: Kevan PG, Imperatriz-Fonseca V, editors. Pollinating
Bees: The Conservation Link Between Agriculture and Nature. Brasilia, Brazil:
Ministry of Environment, pp 71–74.
Buchmann SE, Nabhan GP. 1996. The Forgotten Pollinators. Washington DC:
Island Press.
Carreck N, Williams IH. 1998. The economic value of bees in the UK. Bee
World 79:115–123.
Cane JH. 2001. Habitat fragmentation and native bees: A premature verdict?
Conservation Ecology 5(1):3.
Deodikar GB, Suryanarayana MC. 1977. Pollination in the services of increasing
farm production in India. In: Nair PKK, editor. Advances in Pollen Spore Research.
New Delhi, India: Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, pp 60–82.
Dulta PC, Verma LR. 1987. Role of insect pollinators on yield and quality of
apple fruit. Indian Journal of Horticulture 44:274–279.
Eardley C, Roth D, Clarke J, Buchmann S, Gemmill B. 2006. Pollinators and
Pollination: A Resource Book for Policy and Practice. Pretoria, South Africa:
African Pollinator Initiative.
Fitter AH, Fitter RSR. 2002. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants.
Science 296(5573):1689–1691.
Free JB. 1993. Insect Pollination of Crops. 2nd edition (1st edition 1970).
London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1185
Gallai N, Salles J-M, Settele J, Vaissiere BE. 2009. Economic valuation of the
vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecological
Economics 68:810–821.
Gupta JK, Goyal NP, Sharma JP, Gautam DR. 1993. The effect of placement of
varying numbers of Apis mellifera colonies on the fruit set in apple orchards
having different proportions of pollinisers. In: Veeresh GK, Uma Shankar R,
Ganeshaiah KN, editors. Proceedings of the International Symposium on
Pollination in the Tropics, India. Bangalore, India: International Union for
Studies on Social Insects, pp 179–201.
Inouye DW, Saavedra F, Yang LW. 2003. Environmental influences on the
phenology and abundance of flowering by Androsace septentrionalis
(Primulaceae). Americal Journal of Botany 90:905–910.
Jindal KK, Gautam DR. 2004. Apple. In: Jindal KK, Sharma RC, editors. Recent
Trends in Horticulture in the Himalayas. New Delhi, India: Indus Publishing,
pp 85–98.
Johansen CA. 1977. Pesticides and pollinators. Annual Review of Entomology
22:177–192.
Kevan PG. 1991. Pollination: Keystone process in sustainable global
productivity. Acta Horticulturae 288:103–110.
Kevan PG, Phillips TP. 2001. The economic impacts of pollinator declines: An
approach to assessing the consequences. Conservation Ecology 5(1):8.
Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at
risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 99:16812–16816.
Liu ZJ, Zhang FT. 2002. Issues in sweet cherry cultivation. Shanxi Fruit 1:57–58.
Matheson AG, Schrader M. 1987. The Value of Honeybees to New Zealand’s
Primary Production. Nelson, New Zealand: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.
McGregor SE.1976. Insect Pollination of Cultivated Crop Plants. Washington,
DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
Miller JR, Chen YH, Russell GL, Francis JA. 2007. Future regime shift in
feedbacks during Arctic winter. Geophysiology Research Letters 34:L23707.
Morse RA, Calderone NW. 2001. The value of honey bees as pollinators of US
crops in 2000. Bee Culture 128:1–15
Partap U. 2003. Improving agricultural productivity and livelihoods through
pollination: Some issues and challenges. In: Waliyar F, Collette L, Kenmore PE,
editors. Beyond the Gene Horizon. Hyderabad, India and Rome, Italy:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) and
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), pp 118–135.
Partap U, Partap T. 1997. Managed Crop Pollination: The Missing Dimension of
Mountain Agricultural Productivity. Mountain Farming Systems’ Discussion
Paper Series No. MFS 97/1. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for
Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD).
Partap U, Partap T. 2002. Warning Signals from Apple Valleys of the HKH
Region: Pollination Problems and Farmers’ Management Efforts. Kathmandu,
Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD).
Partap U, Verma LR. 1994. Pollination of Radish by Apis cerana.Journal of
Apicultural Research 33:237–241.
Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J, Tran Q,
Saltman T, Cliff B. 1997. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversi ty.
Bioscience 47:747–757.
Ruijter AD. 2002. Pollinator diversity and sustainable agriculture in the
Netherlands. In: Kevan PG, Imperatriz-Fonseca V editors. Pollinating Bees: The
Conservation Link between Agriculture and Nature. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministry of
Environment, pp 67–70.
Singh MP, Singh KI, Devi CS. 2000. Role of Apis cerana pollination on yield and
quality of rapeseed and sunflower crops. In: Matsuka M, Verma LR, Wongsiri S,
Shrestha KK, Partap U, editors. Asian Bees and Beekeeping: Progress of
Research and Development. New Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH, pp 199–202.
Tang Y, Chen KM, Xie JS. 2003. Hand pollination of pears and its implications
for biodiversity conservation and environmental protection: A case study from
Hanyuan County, Sichuan Province, China. Unpublished report submitted to the
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). Available
at www.internationalpollinatorsinitiative.org/jsp/studies/studies.jsp; accessed
on 12 April 2012.
Verma LR, Partap U.1994. Foraging behaviour of Apis cerana on cabbage and
cauliflower and its impact on seed production. Journal of Apicultural Research
33:231–236.
Winston ML, Scott CD. 1984. The value of bee pollination to Canadian
agriculture. Canadian Beekeeping 11:134.
MountainResearch
Mountain Research and Development http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00108.1186
... Should pollinators disappear, production of these foods that are crucial for micronutrients, vitamins and minerals in healthy diets (Coghlan & Bhagwat, 2022) would reduce by up to 85% (see Figure 1.4.1), with a significant global impact on human health. In some areas, pollinators have declined to the point that pollination is done by hand, even on large commercial crops, or farming practices are being forced to change to crops that are less reliant on pollinators (Partap & Ya, 2012). Therefore, putting environmental considerations aside, pollinators are vital to us purely in terms of enlightened self-interest. ...
... Due to the short blooming period of pear trees, manual pollination is necessary to ensure fruit quality and work efficiency. Traditional manual pollination in greenhouses involves using brushes, requiring significant labor [7,8]. Farmers face challenges such as poor air circulation, high humidity, and the height of the pear trees. ...
Article
Full-text available
Greenhouse cultivation promotes an efficient and environmentally friendly agricultural production model, significantly enhancing resource sustainability and advancing sustainable agriculture. Traditional greenhouse pollination methods are inefficient and labor-intensive, limiting the economic benefits of greenhouse pear cultivation. To improve pollination efficiency and achieve fully automated mechanized operations, an innovative design method for greenhouse pear pollination drones has been developed. First, design criteria were extracted using Grounded Theory (GT), and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to determine the weight of user demand evaluation indicators. Next, the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method translated user needs into technical requirements, resulting in the final ranking of design element weights. The drone was then designed based on these weighted rankings, yielding an optimal solution. This method quantifies the functional requirements of the product, effectively identifying key needs for the greenhouse pear pollination drones and proposing targeted solutions. Additionally, it provides a design reference for other highly functional agricultural machinery products.
... Firstly, the use of humans as pollinators for artificial pollination of crops such as cocoa, apples and tomato on a large scale in some countries like Indonesia. The human used their hand, with the help of forceps, to transfer pollens from the anther of the male flower to the stigma of the female flower of a plant (Partap and Ya 2012;Ozores-Hampton 2017;Claus et al. 2018). Lastly, APT has been applied by the use of robotic pollinators in the context of decreasing populaces of insect and other natural pollinators, especially in the United State. ...
Article
Full-text available
Artificial Pollination Technology (APT) is one of the current efforts implemented to ensure sustainable bean production in Ghana. The study examined the beneficiaries' perceived effectiveness of a piloted artificial pollination technology, and identified the best predictors of cocoa farmers' willingness to adopt the piloted APT in a district in the Eastern, Ghana. A total of 315 beneficiaries were interviewed for the study using structured interview schedule. The majority (80%) of the respondents perceived APT to be highly effective in increasing their yield after the APT. There was a statistically significant difference of approximately 50% increase in the yield of cocoa farmers' before and after the APT project. The majority (64%) of the respondents were willing to adopt APT after the pilot. The binary logistic regression analysis showed that seven predictors (age of cocoa farmers; educational level; number of cocoa farms; perceived complexity of APT; pruning of cocoa farm before pollination; pollination of farms at the recommended age; and pollination of hybrid variety) significantly contributed between 38.4% to 54.4% of the variance in cocoa farmers' willingness to adopt APT with "pollinating of recommended variety (hybrid)" being the overall best predictor (Odd ratio =2.9). The study recommends educating and training cocoa farmers on planting of hybrid cocoa for pollination, to increase their yields in cocoa production. Future research could also explore the use of robotic 'insects' in the pollination of cocoa flowers to ensure precise pollination of flowers, assist human workers performing laborious work and ensure sustainable cocoa production in Ghana and other cocoa growing regions.
... Declines of wild pollinators have also been shown to be greatest in areas of high agricultural output in the United States, causing a spatial mismatch between the need for and the provision of pollination services (Koh et al., 2016); such patterns are likely to occur elsewhere. In an extreme case, the loss of pollinators has forced farmers to resort to pollinating crops by hand; an extremely costly and labourintensive process (Partap & Ya, 2012;Wurz et al., 2021). Actively managing agricultural and peri-agricultural lands to maximise pollinator functional diversity, including through avoided land conversion and the maintenance of natural ecosystems in agricultural matrices, has a positive impact on overall agricultural output. ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
"This report comprises two parts. Part I, the bulk of the report, assesses the relationships between nature conservation and agriculture in our globalised world, drawing from data, publications, and expertise from IUCN and beyond. Chapter 1 provides definitions and framing of ‘agriculture’, ‘nature’, and associated terms. Chapter 2 uses both synthesis of the evidence and empirical analysis to explore how agriculture affects nature. Chapter 3, conversely, explores the impacts that nature, mediated by ecosystem services and disservices, has on agriculture. Drawing from these, Chapter 4 harnesses integrated assessment modelling to examine the prospects for simultaneous achievement of global goals for both agriculture and conservation. Chapter 5 then examines a range of realistic policy scenarios currently under discussion in the agriculture and conservation sectors and beyond. Chapter 6 concludes with key messages emerging from the report. Finally, Part II documents four key indicators of nature and conservation, drawing in part from data based on IUCN standards for countries across the world."
... To cope with this decline, researchers have proposed various approaches, considering for instance the building of artificial pollinators [2]. In some regions of China, even humans are replacing pollinators for some fruit crops [11]. ...
... AP is primarily adopted to enhance fruit setting and quality while preventing any potential monetary loss (Wurz et al. 2021). Manual pollination has its unique advantages; for example, it enables growers to have precise control over pollen source and quantity (Oronje et al. 2012), regulate pollination timing and frequency (Gonzalez et al. 1998), and reduce yield susceptibility to environmental fluctuations (Partap and Ya 2012). However, small-scale farms or home gardens find it challenging to keep up with the escalating labor costs associated with AP. ...
Article
Full-text available
The production of melons ( Cucumis melo L.) in greenhouses relies on pollination. Extreme temperature and insufficient light reduce not only flower visitation by pollinators but also pollen viability, resulting in inefficient pollination. In this study, we investigated the effects of forchlorfenuron [(N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N′-phenylurea (CPPU)] on the fruit setting and growth of oriental melons ( C. melo L. var. makuwa Makino). The primary objective was to devise a new strategy for the management of oriental melons. Treatment with 5 mg·L ⁻¹ CPPU a day before flowering (T1), on the day of flowering (T2), and a day after flowering (T3) increased the fruit setting rate (by 20.1% to 30%) in melons subjected to artificial pollination (AP) or no pollination (NP) compared with the rate in those subjected to only artificial pollination without CPPU (CK). CPPU treatment induced unfertilized seeds; in addition, a tendency toward parthenocarpy was noted. The highest fruit setting rate (∼95%) was noted in plants subjected to the following treatments: AP+T1 and NP+T3. The rates of abnormal fruit formation decreased from 45.2% of CK group to 9.4% in plants subjected to AP+T1 and to 19.4% in those subjected to NP+T3. Elevated exogenous concentrations of CPPU markedly increased fruit weight. Plants subjected to NP+10 mg·L ⁻¹ CPPU bore the heaviest fruits (541.0 g), which were heavier than those borne by plants subjected to AP+10 mg·L ⁻¹ CPPU. CPPU treatment reduced the fruit cavity ratio in a concentration-dependent manner from 47.3% to 33.6% and increased the pulp thickness from 1.5 to 2.5 cm. Notably, supplementary CPPU treatment exerted no significant effects on fruit traits. Regarding taste, inconsistent results were obtained for sugar accumulation. Although the content of cucurbitacin B increased immediately after the initial CPPU treatment, it markedly decreased after 15 days of CPPU treatment. Therefore, mature melons did not have a bitter taste.
... Insects (bees, butterflies, flies, and others) are the most important pollinators of agricultural crops and thus play a fundamental part in maintaining food security for humans. However, a range of factors such as excessive application of chemical pesticides, habitat loss as a result of ongoing land use change, spread of pathogens, competition from alien species, and climate change, have led to an alarming decline in pollinator abundance and diversity, both globally and in the HKH region (Aizen & Feinsinger, 1994;Allen-Wardell et al., 1998;Partap & Partap 2002Partap et al., 2001;Partap, 2003;2011;Berezin & Beiko, 2002;Biesmeijer et.al., 2006;Eardley et al., 2006;Potts et al., 2010;Cameron et.al., 2011;Partap & Tang, 2012;IPBES, 2016). The serious implications of this decline were made clear in an extensive ICIMOD study by Partap & Partap (2002) in the apple farming regions of the Himalayas (Bhutan, China, India, Nepal, Pakistan), which showed a severe decline in apple yield and quality as a result of inadequate pollination. ...
Book
Full-text available
Large cardamom (Amomum subulatum Roxb.) is the main cash crop and an important livelihood option for farming communities in the eastern Himalayas – especially Sikkim, parts of West Bengal, eastern Nepal, and southern Bhutan. The crop is self-fertile but requires cross-pollination for the production of capsules. Scientific information on the eco-biology of large cardamom pollination is scarce, but studies have shown bumblebees to be the main pollinators. Previous studies have indicated contradictory results on the role of indigenous honeybees, particularly Apis cerana, in pollinating large cardamom. Some studies reported that Apis cerana was a ‘pollen robber’ that collects all the pollen from a flower without actually pollinating it, resulting in severe crop decline. However, beekeeping is common in large cardamom farming areas of Sikkim and Nepal and the bee is a common visitor to the flowers. Farmers in these areas have never observed a decline in large cardamom yield due to the presence of Apis cerana. This publication describes the results of a detailed investigation into the role of Apis cerana in large cardamom pollination, designed to establish whether the bee is a pollinator or pollen robber and determine its impact on crop yield and quality. The research was conducted on farmers’ fields located at different sites in Sikkim, India: Lingee Payong (1,100 masl) and Hee Martam (1,500 masl) in West Sikkim, and Jaubari (2,000 masl) in South Sikkim. The methodology consisted of on-farm experimental research and data collection through regular field observations, and a review of the literature on large cardamom pollination. Three experimental procedures were used at each site: (i) observations of the foraging behaviour of Apis cerana bees on cardamom flowers, and the impact of pollination by Apis cerana and other pollinators on capsule yield and quality (capsule weight and number of seeds per capsule), in a plot with a medium-sized healthy colony of Apis cerana placed at the centre; (ii) observations of the foraging behaviour of bumblebees and other pollinators, and of capsule yield and quality, in a plot about 250 m away from the plot containing the Apis cerana colony; and (iii) observations of capsule yield and quality in plants caged in a nylon net (3 x 3 x 3 m) to exclude all pollinators as a control. The study results showed that Apis cerana is an effective pollinator of large cardamom. Although the Apis cerana bees are relatively small, they landed on the anther-stigma column of the cardamom flowers multiple times from different directions while collecting pollen which ensured that they also touched the stigma and thus pollinated the flowers. Other favourable foraging attributes included foraging throughout the day, visiting all flowers on a panicle and then moving on to another, and multiple visits to flowers. The favourable attributes translated into a 45% increase in yield compared to natural pollination in fields with a supplementary Apis cerana colony. The fruit set, seed set, and fruit and seed weight (capsule quality) were significantly higher in plots with an Apis cerana colony than in plots without a colony or with all pollinators excluded. The results suggest that, especially in areas where bumblebee populations and other natural pollinators are scarce, Apis cerana can be used to pollinate large cardamom to ensure a reasonable harvest and better quality capsules.
Chapter
This chapter looks at the literary devices used in “insectaggedon” narratives, both in the “too many” and “too few” camp. It makes particular reference to two stories: Brooke Jarvis’ 2018 “The insect apocalypse is here, what does it mean for the rest of life on Earth?” which appeared in the New York Times, and Pulitzer Prize winner Kathryn Schulz’s stinkbug piece for The New Yorker. The chapter breaks up these narratives piece by piece and analyzes the literary devices their authors resort to. These include writing within a genre, polarity, conflation, comparison, echoing cultural stereotypes, exaggeration, as well as the creation of a viable villain within a hero-villain dynamic.
Article
Celem pracy jest określenie wartości zapylania sadów jabłoniowych w Polsce metodą kosztów zastąpienia. Dokonano także przeglądu metod szacowania wartości zapylania roślin uprawnych oraz podano wielkość i strukturę upraw sadowniczych w Polsce. Badania wykazały, że w przypadku potrzeby zastąpienia owadów zapylających przez człowieka do zapylenia sadów jabłoniowych potrzeba od 1,4 do 2,7 mln osób. Liczba osób niezbędnych do zapylenia hektara sadu jabłoniowego wyniosła 7-14 osób, a wartość zapylenia od 8,4 do 16,8 tys. zł. Wartość zapylenia sadów jabłoniowych oszacowana metodą kosztów zastąpienia wyniosła od 1,6 do 3,3 mld zł. Świadczy to o znaczącej roli owadów zapylających dla sadownictwa.
Chapter
With the expansion of orchards and market demand, the need for artificial pollination is increasing. Manual pollination is a laboring and dangerous task. As the orchards have faced labour shortages and increasing labor costs, researchers are turning their attention to automated pollination robots. Aerial pollination uses Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to pollinate crops in two directions: wind field and precision. Wind field pollination is achieved by blowing pollen into the air through the wind field generated by the UAV during flight, thus achieving wind-borne pollination in natural pollination. Aerial precision pollination is similar to ground-based precision pollination in that a navigation system such as GPS with a navigation algorithm are used to plan the route, or incorporate a camera for route planning assistance. The camera takes pictures of the flowers, identification and location them, and determines the status of the pollinated flowers through CNN-based algorithms. The chapter describes in detail the automatic navigation techniques and image recognition techniques used in the precision pollination process, illustrating the entire pollination process by pollination robots. It concludes with a discussion of existing issues and an outlook on future directions.
Article
Full-text available
Since agricultural activities were first recorded, there have been shortages of pollinators. Today it seems that pollination systems in many areas of agriculture are threatened by the inadequacy or lack of sustainable managed, indigenous, or imported pollinators. Pollinator shortages can adversely affect crop production and commodity markets. This paper presents an economic model than can be used. to measure some of the economic impacts of pollinator deficits on traded commodities. This economic analysis indicates that consumers of a commodity affected by a pollinator deficit may suffer because the commodity costs more and becomes less available. At the same time, although the producers of the affected commodity may experience crop declines, they may also experience economic gains in the form of higher prices. The amount the producer gains or loses depends on the shape of the supply and demand functions, and the magnitude of these losses or gains is an empirical question. Although there are few data available to evaluate this model, those we do have indicate that serious problems for world food supply, security, and trade could be in the offing if current declines in pollinator abundance, diversity, and availability are not reversed. Various crops and cropping systems are suggested as practical starting places for economic studies of the effects of pollinator declines, with emphasis on the type of data required.
Article
Full-text available
Few studies directly address the consequences of habitat fragmentation for communities of pollinating insects, particularly for the key pollinator group, bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes). Bees typically live in habitats where nesting substrates and bloom are patchily distributed and spatially dissociated. Bee studies have all defined habitat fragments as remnant patches of floral hosts or forests, overlooking the nesting needs of bees. Several authors conclude that habitat fragmentation is broadly deleterious, but their own data show that some native species proliferate in sampled fragments. Other studies report greater densities and comparable diversities of native bees at flowers in some fragment size classes relative to undisrupted habitats, but find dramatic shifts in species composition. Insightful studies of habitat fragmentation and bees will consider fragmentation, alteration, and loss of nesting habitats, not just patches of forage plants, as well as the permeability of the surrounding matrix to interpatch movement. Inasmuch as the floral associations and nesting habits of bees are often attributes of species or subgenera, ecological interpretations hinge on authoritative identifications. Study designs must accommodate statistical problems associated with bee community samples, especially non-normal data and frequent zero values. The spatial scale of fragmentation must be appreciated: bees of medium body size can regularly fly 1-2 km from nest site to forage patch. Overall, evidence for prolonged persistence of substantial diversity and abundances of native bee communities in habitat fragments of modest size promises practical solutions for maintaining bee populations. Provided that reserve selection, design, and management can address the foraging and nesting needs of bees, networks of even small reserves may hold hope for sustaining considerable pollinator diversity and the ecological services pollinators provide. view at: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art3
Article
Full-text available
In the UK, as elsewhere in Europe, bees are valued not only for the honey and wax that they produce, but also for the pollination service that they provide to the majority of our crops and wild flowers. However, no estimate of their value in economic terms has been made in recent years.
Article
In the Kathmandu valley of Nepal, cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) plants had averages of 7 branches with 600 flowers and 12 branches with 94 flowers, respectively. Flower diameter was 14.9 mm in cauliflower and 13.8 mm in cabbage. The yellow flowers of both crops opened in the morning and remained open for two to three days; the total flowering period of each crop lasted for about one month, with cauliflower beginning in mid-February and cabbage in mid-March. Apis cerana colonies were caged individually with plants of the target crops. Bees started foraging on cauliflower and cabbage at c. 07.00 h and 06.30 h, respectively, and ceased flight activity at c. 18.00 h and 18.30 h, respectively. Foraging on cauliflower started at ambient temperatures of 7°C. Peak foraging activity was between 11.00 h and 13.00 h for each crop. The duration of individual foraging trips was 26.9 min for cauliflower and 23.9 min for cabbage. Visits to individual flowers lasted from 4.3 to 6.7 s during the day in both crops; bees visited 5–8 flowers/min. On each crop bees collected either pollen or nectar but never both during the same foraging trip. For both crops, pollen collectors outnumbered nectar collectors during the morning while the opposite occurred in the afternoon. Individual loads of cauliflower pollen weighed 5–9 mg; cabbage pollen loads weighed 8–10 mg. Fruit set on cauliflower plants pollinated by A. cerana was 57% higher than on control plants (pollinators excluded) and 20% higher than on open- pollinated plants. Fruit set on cabbage plants following bee pollination was 27% higher than on open-pollinated plants; control plants did not set fruit. Siliques (fruits) from control, open-pollinated and bee-pollinated cauliflower plants had 3,15 and 20 seeds, respectively. Open-pollinated and bee-pollinated siliques of cabbage had 18 and 28 seeds, respectively. Germination of seeds from bee-pollinated plants was 16% and 12% higher than for seeds from control and open-pollinated cauliflower plants, respectively, and 28% higher than for seeds from open-pollinated cabbage plants.
Article
At the present time in Russia populations of many species of bees, including bumble bees, are strongly influenced by various anthropogenic factors. For example, there were 31 bumble species in Moscow region 50 years ago, by now 7 species have disappeared, populations of 8 species have been severely reduced, those of 5 species have been moderately reduced, and only 9 bumble bee species remain stable. Thirty-seven endangered bee species, including 18 bumble bees species, are included in The Moscow region Red Data Book and 10 bees species are included in The Russia Red Data Book. In Russia the Red Data Book lists form a legal basis for bee conservation in State Natural Reserves, National Parks and in smaller reserve. Two principal uses of native bees in Russia are in pollination of forage legumes and crops. In Russia over 40 species of solitary bees are active pollinators of alfalfa flowers and more than 30 bumble bee species are the best pollinators of red clover. Curiously, Russian farmers actively imported Megachile rotundata from North America for alfalfa pollination. Since the 1970s there are several firms breeding Osmia and Megachile in USSR. But nowadays these programs have ceased for economical reasons. The studies on effective use of bumble bees for crop pollination and rearing of bumble bee colonies in laboratory conditions in Russia began early this century. Since 1994 some Russian greenhouse agrofirms began importing bumble bee colonies of Bombus terrestris from Western Europe for pollination of tomatoes and other Solanaceae. Recently some Russian firms have begun producing bumble bee colonies.