Conference PaperPDF Available

Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for Seating Dimensions in Laboratory

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Tractor seat is one of the important component / assembly as far as the human machine system and comfort of tractor operator are concerned .With this in view, a field survey and laboratory study were conducted of selected popular tractors and tractor seats, respectively, with particular reference to seating dimensions. Dimensions for seat pan and backrest were measured and analyzed, according to BIS recommendations. The results highlighted that seat pan width was found 10.9% less, seat height was found 15.3% in excess, no vertical adjustments and backrest width was also found 20.4% less. This may cause discomfort for smaller as well as higher percentile tractor operators. Based upon the design of mounting arrangement of different tractor seats – a common device i.e. seat base plate was developed. This plate may serve as a base for providing isolators for vibration attenuation. Also, this arrangement may be quite useful in testing of different tractor seats, under the constraints in availability of different makes of tractors at a time for experimental study or testing work. The study also highlighted that present tractor seats need minor modifications / improvements in seating dimensions as per BIS recommendations. The development of a common seat base plate may prove to be a step forward in the direction of long awaited tractor standardization. The information thus obtained can be utilized in seat design, work place lay out as well as adapted by agriculture engineers for better work environment. Keywords: Tractor seat, seating dimensions, workplace layout, free point 3 D digitizer, India.
Content may be subject to copyright.
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for
Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR
Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
1
Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for Seating Dimensions in Laboratory
K.K. Jain
1, *
, A.K. Shrivastava
2
and C.R. Mehta
3
1
Research Engineer, Post Harvest Technology Scheme,
Department of Agril. Process Engineering, College of Agril. Engineering & Technology,
Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh (Gujarat - India)
2
Professor & Head, Deptt. of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering.
College of Agril. Engg, JNKVV, Jabalpur (M. P. - India)
3
Senior Scientist, Central Institute of Agril. Engineering, Bhopal (M. P. - India)
*email :
kjain_123@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT
Tractor seat is one of the important component / assembly as far as the human machine
system and comfort of tractor operator are concerned .With this in view, a field survey and
laboratory study were conducted of selected popular tractors and tractor seats, respectively,
with particular reference to seating dimensions. Dimensions for seat pan and backrest were
measured and analyzed, according to BIS recommendations. The results highlighted that seat
pan width was found 10.9% less, seat height was found 15.3% in excess, no vertical
adjustments and backrest width was also found 20.4% less. This may cause discomfort for
smaller as well as higher percentile tractor operators. Based upon the design of mounting
arrangement of different tractor seats – a common device i.e. seat base plate was developed.
This plate may serve as a base for providing isolators for vibration attenuation. Also, this
arrangement may be quite useful in testing of different tractor seats, under the constraints in
availability of different makes of tractors at a time for experimental study or testing work.
The study also highlighted that present tractor seats need minor modifications / improvements
in seating dimensions as per BIS recommendations. The development of a common seat base
plate may prove to be a step forward in the direction of long awaited tractor standardization.
The information thus obtained can be utilized in seat design, work place lay out as well as
adapted by agriculture engineers for better work environment.
Keywords: Tractor seat, seating dimensions, workplace layout, free point 3 D digitizer,
India.
1. INTRODUCTION
Mechanization in agriculture has changed the characteristics of labour and has also
influenced the work load (Salokhe et al. 1995). Presently, in India also, with a relatively good
monsoon and farmers switching over to mechanized farming, tractor volumes are picking up.
The current population of tractors in India is around 3.0 million and more than 0.25 million
tractors are added to Indian agriculture every year. India stands as the largest manufacturer of
tractors in the world (Singh and Doharey, 1999). At the same time, though tractorization has
reduced the drudgery involved in the farm operations, but it was evident that tractors had
ergonomic shortcomings (Dupuis, 1959; Fairley, 1995, Balasankari et al., 2004).
Tractor seat is one of the important components / assembly as far as human machine system
is concerned. Each tractor has its own seating arrangement in order to provide better
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for
Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR
Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
2
maneuvrability, control and comfort, for example - steering of tractor, looking backward to
observe and control the machine / implement, and force required to operate clutch, brake and
hydraulic control lever. The task and workplace determine the postures and create a pattern of
loading on the structures of the body of the individual. An attempt has been made to observe
the pattern of seating dimensions as per Indian Standard 12343: 1998 (version of ISO 4253 :
1993), by mounting seats of different makes on a selected tractor. Thus, this paper describes
the analysis and comparative study of different makes of tractor seats in a field survey as well
as laboratory study.
1.1 Objectives
1. To conduct field survey and laboratory measurements for seating dimensions of
available tractor seats.
2. To compare different tractor seats for their seating dimensions, as per BIS standards.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The following experiments was carried out under this study –
2.1 Field Survey
A field survey was carried out to collect information on seating dimensions and mechanisms
of different makes of new tractor seats. Relevant anthropometric seating dimensions – seat
length, seat width, seat height, back rest width and back rest height etc., feasible and suitable
for field work were measured with the help of measuring steel tape, scale etc. Fig. 1 to 3
show the mechanisms adapted for Indian tractor seats. Seating dimensions thus measured and
recorded were compiled for seating comfort as per the dimensions of the Indian standard for
comparative study.
Figure 1. View of tractor seats during field survey
2.2 Laboratory Seating Dimensions Measurement
A set up, as shown in Fig. 4, was used for measurement in the laboratory. Measurement of
various seating dimensions was made by a Freepoint 3D-digitizer instrument precisely. This
instrument works on reflection of radiations emerged from point under consideration and
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for
Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR
Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
3
provides measurement in all the three coordinates. A Freepoint computer software was also
installed.
Five commonly adapted tractor seats (S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5), as shown in Fig. 5, of
different makes were procured for precise measurement with the instrument installed. The
Seat Reference Point (SRP) and Seat Index Point (SIP) (SRP & SIP were determined as per
the IS 11806, 1986 and IS 11113, 1985, respectively standards) were located by SRP device,
as shown in Fig. 6. Various angular measurements, shape, seat mounting base area etc. were
also worked out.
Figure 2. Tractor seat view showing Figure 3. Overall view of a tractor seat
suspension mechanism and inclined without open space for backrest
seat base plate
Figure 4. Setting up triangle detector array Figure 5. Selected tractors seats for
of freepoint-3D digitizer measurement set-up laboratory study
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for
Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR
Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
4
Figure 6 Determining the location of
SRP as per IS:11806, 1986
2.3 Development of a Common Seat Mounting Base Plate
On the basis of seat mounting arrangement and seat type mounting dimensions, mechanism
etc., a M.S. (mild steel) plate having size 310 x 240 x 10 mm, was taken and 12 mm.
diameter holes were drilled on this plate, as per seats mounting dimensions layout, so it may
accommodate all the seats under laboratory study. On the bottom of the plate, proper nuts
were welded, so as to have easiness and rigidity in tightening seat bolts. Thus, different
makes of tractor seats could easily be fitted for comparative study and analysis.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results of field survey of eight tractor seats and laboratory study of five selected tractor seats
have been discussed as below –
3.1 Field Survey
Seating dimensions of eight different tractor seats were measured in a field survey as
presented in Table-1. On comparing from the prescribed anthropometric measurements as per
Indian Standards, revealed that – Seating dimensions of eight new popular commercially
available tractors at dealer’s workshop were measured in a field survey. The seating
dimensions of 8 different tractor seats are given in Table 1. The obtained results indicated,
that seat lengths of T1 and T5 tractors were found within the range as per IS 12343:1998,
while, other tractors seating dimensions were observed slightly less; i.e. 0.3 to 2.6%. Seat
width of T1 tractor was found in the range but for other tractors, seat width was found less,
i.e. 0.5 to 10.9%. This variation may lead to discomfort for tractor operators. Seat heights in
most of the tractors were found to be too high, i.e. 0.6 to 15.3%. This should be a
consideration in redesigning tractor seats. Seat pan concavity was found between 18 to 38
mm. As regards seat adjustment, longitudinally about 50 to 100 mm was provided in all the
tractor seats, while only in T2 and T8 tractor seats could be adjusted longitudinally as well as
vertically about 17 to 46 mm, by virtue of inclined seat mounting arrangement. As regards,
the back rest width, none of the tractor seats were found to be in conformance to the Indian
standards i.e. > 450 mm. Table results indicated that it was found less, i.e. 7.1 to 20.4% in all
seats. Back rest height as per IS should be independently adjustable and kept more than 260
mm. In almost all the tractor seat, it was found as per anthropometric data of Indian
operators, except in T5 seat, where there was no open space provided to accommodate the
sacrum and fleshy parts of buttocks of the operator, just above the seat pan, by which this
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for
Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR
Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
5
backrest height was comparatively more as compared to other seats. Backrest concavity was
found from 18 to 36 mm.
The field survey results indicated that still there is a need for modifying tractor seat design in
the areas of seat height, seat vertical adjustment and back rest width, as per Indian standard
anthropometric considerations.
3.2 Laboratory Study
A free point 3D digitizer instrument was used to measure the seating dimensions of five
selected tractor seats. Seating dimensions of different seats were compared with the above
Indian standard. The results, as shown in Table 2, indicated that the seat lengths were found
to be almost within the range, as prescribed by the IS i.e. 350 to 450 mm. But, in case of seats
S1, S3 and S4 it was found to be slightly less then as required, i.e. -1.4 to 4.3%. Seat widths
of S2, S3 and S5 tractor seats were found within the prescribed range as per Indian standard,
while S1 and S4 seat widths were found slightly below i.e. 2.2 to 7.3%. This may contribute
to discomfort for the tractor operators, particularly those in the higher anthropometrical
percentile population. As regards, the seat adjustment, it was observed that the none of the
seats were provided with vertical adjustment facilities but have longitudinal adjustment in
between i.e. 50 to 140 mm for different seats. Seat pan cushion thickness and angle of seat
pan inclination with seat surface were found within limits.
Back rest seat widths of different seats were not found as per the Indian standard. All the
seats were found below the prescribed limit, i.e. 7.8 to 17.1%. While, back rest height of seats
were found within the range of Indian standard, by including the maximum vertical open
space above the top of the compressed seat, so as to accommodate bulged seat and fleshy
portion above the seat surface. Seat suspensions mechanisms operator’s weight range, back
rest concavity, cushion thickness, inclination of back rest axis with vertical was found within
the range. As regards mounting arrangement of different seats on a tractor and utilized space
was concerned, it was found strikingly different for the tractors under study. Above results
also revealed that seating dimensions of tractor seats for Indian operators still need
modifications by improving the tractor seat design.
6
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “ Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for Seating Dimensions in Laboratory “.
Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
Table 1. Field survey - seating dimensions of different types of tractor seats and comparison with Indian standard
S.
No.
Particulars T
1
T
2
T
3
T
4
T
5
T
6
T
7
T
8
Comments as per IS : 12343, 1998 (mm)
1. Seat length (mm) 362
(-)
341
(-2.6)
338
(-3.4)
348
(-0.6)
354
(-)
341
(-2.6)
349
(-0.3)
348
(-0.6)
Buttock popliteal length 5
th
percentile =
400 +
50
2. Seat width (mm) 455
(-)
428
(-4.9)
448
(-0.5)
441
(-2.0)
412
(-8.5)
401
(-10.9)
407
(-9.6)
428
(-4.9)
Hip breadth sitting 95
th
percentile 450
3. Seat height (mm) 555
(+2.8)
568
(+5.2)
543
(+0.6)
572
(+5.9)
458
(-)
622
(+15.2)
623
(+15.3)
520
(-)
Sitting popliteal height 5
th
percentile :
540 (maximum)
4. Seat pan concavity
(mm)
38 30 28 30 30 22 18 26 -
5. Seat adjustment -
a. Longitudinal (mm) 90 47 50 50 100 80 70 131 -
b. Vertical (mm) - 17
(inclined)
- - - - - 46
(inclined)
-
6. Back rest
a. Height (mm)
260
(-)
255
(-)
258
(-)
260
(-)
364
(-)*
260
(-)
265
(-)
262
(-)
Height should be independently
adjustable 260
b. Open space above
the
compressed seat pan
(55) (58) (52) (75) (0) (45) (50) (68)
(fix)
-
7. Back rest width (mm) 415
(-7.8)
381
(-15.3)
407
(-9.5)
402
(-10.7)
381
(-15.3)
358
(-20.4)
418
(-7.1)
377
(-16.2)
Intersey breadth of 95
th
percentile >
450
8. Back rest concavity
(mm)
36 18 28 26 32 18 28 22 -
Note : Figures in parenthesis indicated comparative percentage drop (-) or increase (+) with respect to Indian operators anthropometric dimensions.
7
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “ Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for Seating Dimensions in Laboratory “.
Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
Table 2. Laboratory measurement - Seating dimensions of selected tractor seats by Free point 3D-digitizer instrument
S.
No.
Dimension description with limits as
per IS : 12343, 1998
S
1
S
2
S
3
S
4
S
5
1. Seat length, mm
(400 +
50 mm)
343
(-2.0)
366
(-)
345
(-1.4)
335
(-4.3)
352
(-)
2. Seat width, mm
( 450 mm)
417
(-7.3)
471
(-)
448
(-0.5)
440
(-2.2)
465
(-)
3. Seat pan cushion thickness, mm 48-50 55-58 38-40 45-50 55-60
4. Seat pan concavity, mm 30-32 38-40 30-32 5 30-33
5. Seat adjustment
a. Lon
g
itudinal, mm
100
90-200
140
50
50
b. Vertical, mm - - - - -
c. Type shifting sliding lever /
shifting
sliding lever nut bolts central sliding
slit hole
6. Angle of inclination of seat surface,
de
g
ree (3 to 12
o
b
ackward)
5 12 5 5 10
7. Seat base mounting space size / area
(L x W = cm
2
) and position
33 x 14 = 462
back side of
operator
16 x 9 = 144
moreoless below
the operator
31 x 7 = 217
moreoless below
the operator
25 x 23 = 575
moreoless below
the operator
32 x 24 = 768
moreoless below
the operator
8. Back rest width, mm
( 450 mm)
373
(-17.1)
415
(-7.8)
408
(-9.3)
413
(-8.2)
400
(-11.1)
9. Back rest height, mm
( 260 mm)
max. vertical open space
adjustment, mm (maximum)
240
75
(-7.7)
301
41
(-)
268
30
(-)
260
40
(-)
270
75
(-)
contd-
Remarks: All seats were equipped with parallelogram linkage mechanism with two helical coil springs and a shock absorber.
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural
Engineering International: The CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
8
S.
No.
Dimension description with limits as
per IS : 12343, 1998
S
1
S
2
S
3
S
4
S
5
10. Back rest concavity, mm 32-35 35-38 30-32 10-12 33-35
11. Back rest cushion thickness, mm 30-35 32-35 32-35 45-48 20-22
12. Back rest inclination (degree) from
vertical (5 to 15
o
)
19
O
7
O
10
O
10
O
8
O
13. Angle of inclination between seat
pan and back rest surfaces (degree)
104
o
85
o
95
o
95
o
88
o
14. Seat suspension weight range (kg) 50-120 50-120 50-120 50-120 50-120
15. Location of SRP on seat pan
(x-axis)
38-40 mm 35-40 mm 18-20 mm extremely at the
back side of seat
pan
15-17 mm
16. Seat pan surface Apparently
medium
ribbed,
smooth
corners,
bulged sides
Apparently broad,
ribbed, smooth
corners, bulged
sides
Apparently
broad ribbed,
smooth corners,
bulged sides
Apparently flat
and
comparatively
plain, smooth
corners, slight
bulged sides
Apparently
broad, ribbed,
smooth corners,
bulged sides
17. Back rest surface ribbed plain Central portion
ribbed
plain, unribbed,
moreoless flat
plain
Note : Figures in parenthesis indicated comparative percentage drop (-) or increase (+) with respect to Indian operators anthropometric
measurements.
S indicates the different seats of tractor under study.
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for
Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR
Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
9
4. CONCLUSIONS
1. Presently, all the seats (as surveyed) of Indian tractors are equipped with parallelogram
linkage mechanism with two helical coil springs and a shock absorber.
2. The comparison of measured seating dimensions of different tractor seats with the
recommendations of IS 12343 (1998) indicated that:
a) Seat pan lengths were within the recommended range of 350-450 mm.
b) The seat pan widths of some of tractor seats under the study were lower (up to 10.9%) than
minimum BIS recommendations of 450 mm.
c) Seat heights of some of the tractors exceeded the BIS recommended maximum limit of 540
mm. It may cause excessive pressure on the underside of the thigh, which can reduce blood
circulation to the lower legs.
d) Seat adjustment in longitudinal direction was within the BIS recommended range of ± 100
mm, while vertical seat adjustment was not provided in most of the seats. This may affect the
hand and leg reach, and maximum actuating force of tractor operators for operation of
frequently operated controls like brake pedals, clutch pedal, foot accelerator, steering wheel
etc.
e) The backrest heights of most of the seats were within the BIS recommendation of more or
than or equal to 260 mm. In most of the tractors seats, sufficient open area was provided
below the backrest to accommodate sacrum and fleshy parts of buttocks just above the seat
pan and to allow the lumbar region to fit firmly into the backrest.
f) The backrest widths of tractor seats under the study were lower (up to 20.4%) than
minimum BIS recommendations of 450 mm.
g) Shapes of seat pan and backrest of most of the tractor seats were found alike, but there is a
wide variation in cushion thickness, seat pan and backrest concavities and seat mounting
arrangement on tractors.
h) Seat pan and backrest inclinations as well as suspension weight range were found the same
for most of the tractor seats.
3. Tractor seats of different makes can also be fitted appropriately on the tractor by
incorporating, a properly designed simple (MS plate) seat mounting base plate.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Experimental laboratory work was carried out at Central Institute of Agricultural
Engineering – Bhopal, Madhy Pradesh ( India ). This is gratefully acknowledged.
6. REFERENCES
Balasankari,P.K., K. Kathirvel, R. Manian and C. R. Mehta. 2004. Anti- vibration device for
increased comfort of tractor operators, Extension Bulletin : AEC & RI, TNAU,
Publication : 87 / 2004.
Bureau of Indian Standards. 1998. Agricultural tractors – operators seat – technical
requirements IS 12343.
Dupuis, H. 1959. Effect of tractor operation on human stresses, Agricultural Engineering
40(9) : 510-519.
__________________________________________________________________________
K. K. Jain, A. K. Shrivastava and C. R. Mehta. “Analysis of Selected Tractor Seats for
Seating Dimensions in Laboratory”. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR
Ejournal. Manuscript PM 08 010. Vol. X. December, 2008.
10
Fairley, T. E. 1995. Predicting the discomfort caused by tractor vibration. Ergonomics 38(10)
: 2091 - 2106.
Jain, K. K. 2006. Studies on vibrational characteristics of different tractor seats and
development of vibration isolator for tractor seat, Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis,
JNKVV, Jabalpur.
Salokhe, V. M., B. Majumder and M. S. Islam. 1995. Vibration characteristics of power
tiller. Journal of Terramechanics 32(4) : 181-197.
Singh, G. and R. S. Doharey. 1999. Tractor industry in India AMA. 30(2): 9-14.
... In a combine harvester, a seated operator has to perform various tasks like operation of the header assembly, reel position, ground speed, engine speed, thresher clutch, unloading grain lever, clutch, brake, steering, etc., during harvesting of crops. These tasks force the operator to adopt a suitable posture that creates a pattern of loading on the structures of the body of the individual [9][10][11]. The operator's seat can be used as a tool to modify loads on the body structures to reduce the operator's discomfort [6]. ...
... Jain et al. [11] compared tractor seat dimensions as per the IS 12343 [21] standard and found that seat dimensions need to be modified by improving the seat design by incorporating anthropometric data of the user population [11,21]. It was also observed that the combine harvesters' seat design was not appropriate for the user population on the basis of anthropometric characteristics [3]. ...
... Jain et al. [11] compared tractor seat dimensions as per the IS 12343 [21] standard and found that seat dimensions need to be modified by improving the seat design by incorporating anthropometric data of the user population [11,21]. It was also observed that the combine harvesters' seat design was not appropriate for the user population on the basis of anthropometric characteristics [3]. ...
Article
Introduction: The seat dimensions of self-propelled combine harvesters are designed without consideration of body dimensions of user population and vary with make and models of combines. Methods: The research proposes a method to determine the percentage of seat match, upper mismatch, and lower mismatch using the anthropometric body dimensions of Indian harvester operators. The seat dimensions of five popular combine harvesters makes were measured and compared to the body dimensions of the operators. Results: The selected seats had 100, 44-70, 81-96, 98-100, 63-83, 59-94, and 55-97% mismatch for seat height, seat length, seat pan breadth, seat backrest height, upper backrest breadth, lower backrest breadth, and steering wheel clearance, respectively. These data were used to recommend seat dimensions for combine harvesters. Seat height, seat length, seat pan breadth, seat backrest height, upper backrest breadth, lower backrest breadth, and steering wheel clearance are recommended as 399, 362, 456, 400, 243, 386 and 190 mm, respectively. Conclusions: The recommended seat dimensions matched the user population anthropometric dimensions 94-100%. This approach will help to assess seat dimensions based on anthropometric data for a comfortable posture to prevent health risks such as Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among operators.
... The fact that the operators have to sit on higher seats means that they may not be able to support their feet on the floor, and therefore this situation may lead to increased tissue pressure and discomfort on the underside of the thighs (Pheasant, 2003). Although there is no other similar study reported in the literature with which to compare the results, these findings are in part consistent with the findings of Jain et al. (2008) who reported that the seating dimensions of tractor seats were too high (up to 13.5% mismatch) for Indian operators. ...
... The seat width should be large enough to accommodate larger users and therefore is generally designed for 95th percentile of the hip breadth distribution (Helander, 1997;Oborne, 1996;Sanders and McCormick, 1993). Jain et al. (2008) also reported that the seat widths of some tractor seats in India were lower than the recommended standards. Wider seats (high mismatch), however, existed in 59% of Class 68 and in 16% of JD 955 and JD 1055 models of combines. ...
... JD 955 and JD 1055 (41%) and SK5 (1) (28.5%) models were as a result of a backrest that was too narrow (low mismatch), while in Class 68 and SK5 (2) (29.5%) models were due to a backrest that was too wide. Jain et al. (2008) also reported that the backrest widths of tractor seats were not appropriate (i.e. low mismatch) for up to 20.4% of the Indian operators. ...
... Seat height, seat width, seat depth, backrest height, and backrest width have been considered the most important seat dimensions in previous tractor seat design studies [1,7,30,36]. Seat height can significantly affect the operator's comfort and performance. ...
... Consequently, it would seem advisable to recommend that seat width should be fixed and near its upper limit (452 mm) as much as possible. Based on the seat width of commonly available agricultural tractors in Iran (Table 7), it was assumed that there is no spatial limitation, the upper limit of the corresponding equation was ignored, and Equation (1) was modified to Equation (36). Therefore it is recommended that the seat width should be equal to 452 mm. ...
Article
Background: The dimensional seat design process should consider both the users' tasks and their physical characteristics. Objective: To use an approach for the design and evaluation of seat dimensions based on the anthropometric characteristics of the Iranian population and the requirements of tractor operators. Methods: Some existing equations relating the seat dimensions to anthropometric characteristics were modified according to logical justifications and international standards. A new mathematical-statistical method was used to extract the equations estimating the constant seat dimensions based on the theoretical maximizing of the accommodation level. In addition, an Overall Seat Accommodation Score (OSAS) was developed to represent the mean of seat dimensions accommodation level and dimensional accommodation equality, simultaneously. Results: The dimensional seat design can be affected under different conditions of adjustability, esthetic, and space limitations. However, it was shown that it is possible to improve the design of tractor seats without any significant increase in the final cost and complexity. Conclusion: A new approach was used for tractor seats for a sample of Iranian operators and can be used for the design and evaluation of tractor seats for other target populations.
... Tewari et al. [18] proposed a study to show that anthropometric data of humans to perform agricultural operations using farm machinery are necessary to improve the safety, comfort and design of farm machines. Jain et al. [19] conduct a laboratory study of popular tractor and tractor seats including seating dimensions. Khaksar et al. [20] proposed a study to analyze the tractor operator's whole body vibrations using power spectral density. ...
Article
Full-text available
India is known as the largest tractor manufacturer in the world. There are many pieces of old generation equipment that are used by some farmers with less land to cultivate land but found to be more time-consuming for large-scale agricultural lands. For long hours of operations in the field of agriculture, proper ergonomics and effective design of seats play a vital role in reducing the effect of vibration on human subjects. There are a number of ways discovered to deal with this problem; either it is the improvements done in the suspension system of tractors, improvements in its seating comfort and sitting postures, etc. Seating comfort is one of the main factors that reduce the effect of vibrations during agriculture operations. Seating comfort directly deals with the material of cushions of seat pan and backrest, and it is necessary to use good quality cushions to increase the level of comfort in vehicles. In the current study, a comparative study of different cushion materials used for tractor seats has been analyzed and discussed in concern of reducing the effect of the vibration on tractor driver using FEM. A 3D CAD model of the human subject and tractor seat has been modeled using anthropometric data and reverse engineering. It has been observed that the difference is lower in the case of synthetic rubber foam and higher in the case of polyurethane foam. In the current study, it has been observed that the minimum value of transmissibility is 0.45 which is obtained in the analysis of coir-based composite cushion at 1 Hz frequency, whereas in the experimental study the minimum observed value of transmissibility is 0.40. The results of the current study were found to be in good correlation with the results of the existing literature.
... Devido à inexistência de amortecedores e molas, como em veículos urbanos, o assento do tratorista tem importante papel em minimizar essa vibração, sendo, portanto, importante componente do trator (JAIN et al., 2008). ...
... Contudo, ainda existe uma clara necessidade de desenvolver sistemas para sua prevenção (Tiemessen et al., 2007). Devido à inexistência de amortecedores e molas, como em veículos urbanos, o assento do tratorista tem importante papel em minimizar essa vibração, sendo, portanto, importante componente do trator (Jain et al., 2008). De acordo com Tewari e Dewangan (2009), a redução da vibração, além de diminuir o estresse do operador, permite melhor qualidade de vida e aumento da jornada de trabalho sem causar excesso de fadiga. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tractor driving imposes a lot of physical and mental stress upon the operator. The aim of this work was to evaluate the vibration and noise levels emitted by tractors with different ages, under different motor rotations (1700, 1850 and 2000 rpm). In the evaluations, two agricultural tractors (a 1988 model year with 60.35 kW of power and a 2009 model year with 89.06 kW), without cabin were used, working with a plough. The noise evaluations were made with a sound level meter, in the driver's position. The vibration evaluations were made on the driving seat using an automatic acquisition data system with three accelerometers, in the vertical and horizontal planes. The results showed that the service with the tractors presented noise levels higher than the 85 dB(A) limit for 8 hours of daily exposure, established by the Brazilian Legislation on insalubrity. The need of hearing protection device use by the machine operators was observed. The older tractor presented vibration levels that could compromise health, safety, comfort and efficiency of the driver. This not occurs for the newer tractor.
... Some studies have been done with the aim of evaluating the influence of vibration in operator's body, following the guidelines and rules established by the Ministry of Work and Employment. According to Jain et al. (2008) evaluating the vibration in operation post, they have conclude the use of dampers and springs in operator's seat have an important role in minimizing this vibration. Debiasi et al. (2004) described that the efficiency which the men-machine system executes its functions depends in many issues and that the ergonomics acts over them searching to optimize them to raise the system efficiency in a way to benefit the man, enhancing its yield during working time and saving his health and the machines' components. ...
Article
Full-text available
The use of tractors is indispensable and essential to the agriculture. However, despite being efficient machines, tractors may fail in their projects, leading to the appearance of vibrations in different parts of their structure. Many studies show that the daily exposure to high levels of vibration, these are a risk factor for the health of the whole human body. In view of that, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the vibration levels in two static tractors, with the following specifications: Tractor (1) without cab, 4×2 model TDA manufactured in 1997, 89 kW of nominal engine power; tractor (2) with cab 4×2 model TDA manufactured in 2014, 65 kW of nominal engine power. The rotations were determined by the manufacturer´s manual of both tractors. The vibrations were measured by the accelerometer, properly calibrated. Data were collected in the Test Center of Machines and Agroforestry tires-belonging to the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, UNESP Botucatu-SP. The accelerometer was fixed at different points of the tractors, collecting their overall structural vibration. For the conditions that were conducted this study, it can be concluded that the tractor vibrations tend to increase according to the addition of the use of time of the tractors. The engine is a great source of vibration as noted in both tractors, as soon the vibration in steer wheel control system is a concern, due to the fact that is a place where the operator maintain constant contact, however the vibrations levels in tractor with cabin were lower than tractors without cabin. The cabin is an important equipment in machines protecting the operator from the vibrations, besides the weather roughness, dust and possible objects that could be launched during the operations.
... However, there is still a clear need to develop systems for preventing (TIEMESSEN et al., 2007). In the absence of shock absorbers and springs, as in urban vehicles, the seat of the tractor has an important role in minimizing this vibration, thus being an important component (JAIN et al. 2008). According to Tewari and Dewangan (2009), vibration reduction, that reduces the operator stress, allows better quality of life and increase the workload without causing excessive fatigue. ...
Article
Full-text available
The improvement and reliability of the agricultural machines provided a revolution in the human activities facilitating the production of commodities of agribusiness. Though, the efficiency of the tractor, well as the occurrence of accidents also depends on the level of fatigue to which the operator is submitted. Between the ergonomic factors that affect the operator machine, noise and vibration stand out among the principal. This study aims at evaluating the levels of vibration and noise emitted by agricultural tractors with different powers, comparing the results with existing regulations in Brazil. The tractors studied: MF 4292, MF 283, MF 297 and MF 680. As results, the structures of the seat were able to absorb the impact and creating a good working condition for the machine operator. The vibration levels, in general, were below the limits established for eight hours of work at frequencies 5-10 Hz, for the three directions for all tractors studied.
Chapter
Comfort plays a major role while driving a vehicle. Vehicle seat plays one of the major role in this aspect. In addition to sophistication, there is lot of scope for improving comfort in vehicle seat. That too physically challenged people are facing lot of difficulties in it. Nowadays electrical and electronics plays a vital role in the field of automation and actuation control techniques. So, the primary objective is to develop the mechanism for easy accessibility of seats for physically challenged people. The system includes a sliding rail, swivel plate and a DC motor. The sliding rail is used to move the seat forward and backward. The swivel plate is used to turn the seat at about 360°. The seat turns up to a reasonable position towards the direction of the door and moves front. A DC motor is used as an actuator in this system. The DC motor will do all these processes easily that makes no work to passenger. This makes a very comfortable entry and exit of physically challenged people. This mechanism can be fitted in any type of car.KeywordsPhysically challenged peopleAutomationSliding railSwivel plateDC motorCar seat
Article
A tractor driver suffers from any ill effects due to whole-body vibrations that generate while performing operations in the agricultural field. The acceleration and the level of vibration amplitude vary as per the type of operation selected by the driver while cultivating the field. Even, the impact of vibrations varies according to the suspension type of tractor, field soil, weight, posture, and height of human subject along with other external conditions. The effect of whole-body vibrations on the Indian human subject with a mass of 76 kg equivalent to 95th percentile data of the human male population belonging to the Indian region was investigated in this study. During the disc harrowing process, three RPMs were considered: 1500, 2000, and 2500, with accelerations of 0.5 m/s2, 1 m/s2, and 1.5 m/s2. For finite element analysis, a CAD model (4-layered) consisting of skin, muscles, sensitive organs, and bones i.e. was employed.
Article
Tractor manufacturing in India started in 1961. The tractor industry has grown at a phenomenal pace in the last 5 decades to achieve a record production of over 255 000 units by 1997. It has emerged as one of the leading producers of wheel type tractors in the world. This achievement reflects the dynamism of the tractor manufacturers, as also the pragmatic policies adopted by the Government of India to enable it to meet the growing demand of tractors by the Indian farmers. By the end of 1997, there were about two million tractors and 66 000 power tillers in use on Indian farms. The highest concentration of tractors is in northern India having good irrigation infrastructure. Punjab has reached a saturation level with 82 tractors per 1 000 ha followed by two neighboring states, Haryana with 63 tractors per 1 000 ha and Uttar Pradesh with 24 tractors per 1 000 ha. The sale of tractors continues to be high in the northern and western states (Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra) using dry land preparation and growing mainly wheat. The annual sale of power tillers has been only about 10 000 units. Most of the power tillers have been sold in rice growing states, namely; West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Assam, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh. Easy availability of agricultural credit has contributed significantly towards the growth of the tractor industry.
Article
The vibration characteristics of a power tiller (two-wheel tractor) were studied. Tests were conducted at 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, and 2200 rpm engine speeds in a stationary condition, and at 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, and 1800 rpm engine speeds during transportation and tillage. Tests during tillage operation were conducted in the Bangkok clay soil. For the measurement of vibration, three semiconductor strain-gauge-type accelerometers, capable of sensing vibration signals in three mutually perpendicular directions, i.e. horizontal, lateral and vertical modes at the same time, were used. Vibration characteristics of the power tiller were found to be quite complex. In general, it was observed that, in any working condition, due to an increase in engine speed of the power tiller, the acceleration and frequency of vibration increased. At the same operating speed and test condition, the intensity of the vibration was the highest in the vertical mode and the lowest in the lateral mode. The maximum vibration intensities were observed during second plowing and the lowest vibration intensities were when stationary on an off-road surface. The vibration intensities, when compared to the ISO standard 2631, were found to exceed the standard during field operations.
Article
A field study was conducted to investigate how the discomfort caused by the vibration of an agricultural tractor can be predicted from objective measurements of the vibration in the cabin. Eleven professional drivers judged the vibration discomfort produced by four different tractors on sixteen different test runs. At the same time, for all the tests, the multi-axis vibration in the cabin was measured on the floor, the seat pan and the seat backrest. For each of the 704 tests carried out, the discomfort caused by the vibration was predicted from the measured vibration in the cabin using a total of twenty different analysis procedures. The relative merits of the different prediction procedures were investigated by comparing, on an individual basis for each driver/tractor combination, the statistical significance of the correlations between the subjective judgements and the predicted values. There was considerable variability in the drivers' subjective responses, but it was concluded that, overall, the best procedure for predicting the vibration discomfort in an agricultural tractor is that recommended by ISO 2631 (International Organization for Standardization 1978), using the frequency weighted rms values of the vibration (0.5-20 Hz) measured on the seat pan in the three orthogonal directions, and taking the square-root-of-the-sum-of-the-squares of the values in order to combine the directions as recommended in Amendment 1 to ISO 2631 (International Organization for Standardization 1982).
Studies on vibrational characteristics of different tractor seats and development of vibration isolator for tractor seat
  • K K Jain
Jain, K. K. 2006. Studies on vibrational characteristics of different tractor seats and development of vibration isolator for tractor seat, Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, JNKVV, Jabalpur.
Anti-vibration device for increased comfort of tractor operators
  • P K Balasankari
  • K Kathirvel
  • R Manian
  • C R Mehta
Balasankari,P.K., K. Kathirvel, R. Manian and C. R. Mehta. 2004. Anti-vibration device for increased comfort of tractor operators, Extension Bulletin : AEC & RI, TNAU, Publication : 87 / 2004.
Effect of tractor operation on human stresses
  • H Dupuis
Dupuis, H. 1959. Effect of tractor operation on human stresses, Agricultural Engineering 40(9) : 510-519.