Content uploaded by Eui-Chul Hong
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Eui-Chul Hong on Sep 29, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
39 1 , 45 52 (2012)
Korean J. Poult. Sci. Vol.39, No.1 , 45 52 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.1.045
45
The Study on Growth Performance and Carcass Yield of Meat-type Korean Native Ducks
Hak-Kyu Kim, Bo-Seok Kang, Jong Hwangbo, Chong-Dae Kim, Kang-Nyeong Heo, Hyo-Jun Choo,
Dae-Sung Park, Ok-Suk Suh and Eui-Chul Hong
Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Seonghwan 330-801, Korea
ABSTRACT This study was carried out to investigate the growth performance and the carcass ratio of meat-type Korean
Native Ducks. Four hundred twenty Korean Native Ducks' chicks were selected and divided into four treatments (7 re-
plications/treatment, 15 birds/replication) by strains (A and B) and gender(male and female) with 2×2 fractal factors. There
was no significant difference between A and B on the body weight at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks old (P>0.05). However, body
weight of female was higher at 2 weeks old than male while that of male was higher at the 8 weeks old (P<0.01). Daily
feed intake of male was higher compared to female during 6 8 weeks (P<0.05). On weekly body weight gain, there was
no significant difference between strains, but gained body weight of male was higher until 2 weeks old while that of female
was higher during 6 8 weeks (P<0.01). On the live body weight and carcass weight by strains and genders, B strain was
higher than A strains at the 8 weeks of age (P<0.01). Carcass yield was the highest at 8 weeks of age in both strains (P<0.05).
These results may provided the basic data on growth performance and carcass ratio of meat-type Korean Native Ducks.
(Key words : meat-type, Korean Native Duck, growth performance, carcass ratio)
To whom correspondence should be addressed : drhong@korea.kr
(2011)
2009 12,323
7 .
2000 12.9 , 5,134 2010
5.1 , 14,397 ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
, 1 2000 1.02kg 2010 2.78 kg
( , 2011).
, WTO
FTA
.
,
.
Pekin (Cherry Valley, England; Grimaud, France)
90% , 10% ( ,
2011). (
, 1999) ,
(
, 1999).
.
.
( , 2006) ,
. (3.1 kg
:
46
) ,
, ( , 2006).
,
.
,
,
.
(A, B)
, 210 420
. 2 (A, B)
2 ( , ) 2×2 4 ,
7 , 15 .
(2007)
- 0 3 (CP 22.0%, ME 2,900
kcal/kg) 3 8 (CP 18.0%, ME 3,000 kcal/kg)
8 .
,
. 1 32
, 1 3 5 3
( 24±2.5 ) . 60
70% ,
16 ,
5 10 cm .
.
2
8 , 10 .
,
.
Table 1. Formula and chemical composition of basal diet
0 3 weeks
3 8 weeks
Corn
54.45
61.00
Wheat bran
2.50
10.30
Soybean meal
37.70
18.05
Corn gluten meal
1.50
7.00
Soybean oil
0.50
1.00
Limestone
0.45
0.70
Dicalcium phosphorus
1.40
1.00
DL-methionine
0.10
0.05
L-lysine
0.05
0.05
Vit.-Min. premix1
1.00
0.05
Salt
0.25
0.25
Chemical composition2
ME (kcal/kg)
2,945
3,047
CP (%)
22.4
18.4
Methionine (%)
0.44
0.39
Lysine (%)
1.27
0.86
Ca (%)
0.76
0.66
P (%)
0.46
0.35
1Provided following nutrients per kg of diet : vitamin A, 1,175,000
IU; vitamin D3, 225,000 IU; vitamin E 1,900 IU; vitamin K,
891 mg; vitamin B1, 50 mg; vitamin B2, 2,250 mg; vitamin B6,
750 mg; vitamin B12, 600 mg; Ca-pantothenate, 2,500 mg;
niacin, 15,400 mg; biotin, 110 mg; folic acid, 30 mg; Co, 50
mg; Cu, 1,750 mg; Mn, 36,000 mg; Zn, 24,000 mg; I, 600 mg;
Se, 25 mg.
2Calculated values.
(6 , 7 , 8 ) ,
1
, diethyl ether
. , , ,
.
(%) =
× 100
SAS(2002) GLM(Ge-
Kim et al. : The Study on Performance of Korean Native Ducks
47
neral Linear Model) Program(two-way ANOVA procedure)
, Duncan
(Duncan, 1955) 95% 99%
.
A, B
Table 2 3 .
. 2 4 A
(P<0.05), 8
A (P<0.01). 6
.
2, 4, 6 8 (P>0.05),
2 , 8
(P<0.01). 4 2 4 ,
6 8 B (P<0.05).
Table 2. Body weights (g/bird) change of Korean Native Ducks
Treatment
Weeks
0
2
4
6
8
A,
51.8±0.251
334.8±32.9ab
1,203±26.4ab
2,011±14.6
2,505±22.7c
A,
50.2±0.37
274.8±4.91b
1,145±15.4b
2,009±62.3
2,713±61.4b
B,
50.5±0.38
358.7±5.56a
1,268±31.4a
2,076±76.9
2,617±59.8bc
B,
50.4±0.15
314.8±29.2ab
1,201±49.4ab
2,126±14.5
2,927±31.8a
Strains
A
51.0±0.41
304.8±20.3
1,174±18.8
2,010±28.6
2,609±54.9
B
50.5±0.19
336.8±16.5
1,234±30.2
2,101±36.7
2,772±75.6
Gender
51.1±0.36
346.8±15.9a
1,235±23.4
2,043±37.9
2,561±38.3b
50.3±0.45
294.8±15.9b
1,173±26.3
2,067±38.6
2,820±56.9a
P-value2
Strains
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Gender
NS
**
NS
NS
**
Str.×Gen.
NS
*
*
NS
**
1Means ± S.D. (n=105).
2Provability of contrast: NS, no significant, * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
a-cMeans with different superscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05).
6 8
(P<0.05), .
A B ,
Table 4 Table 6 .
4 0 2 B
(P<0.05), 6 8 A B
(P<0.001). 0 8 B
(P<0.01).
, 0 2
(P<0.05), 6 8 (P<
0.001), 0 8 (P<0.01). 4
B 2 4 (P<0.05)
6 8 (P<0.01) .
(P>0.05), 6 8
(P<0.05). 4
4 6
:
48
Table 3. Daily feed intake (g/bird/day) of Korean Native Ducks
Treatment
Weeks
0 2
2 4
4 6
6 8
0 8
A,
32.3±3.141
170.3±3.81ab
207.9±9.09
277.3±3.37b
172.0±2.66
A,
28.4±0.62
154.7±4.36b
220.4±10.5
280.2±5.31b
170.9±4.06
B,
34.7±0.21
165.6±5.25b
210.4±7.71
275.0±3.87b
171.4±2.71
B,
31.0±2.25
185.3±5.96a
198.1±6.88
310.8±7.34a
181.3±4.72
Strains
A
30.4±1.68
162.5±4.36
214.2±6.81
278.7±2.89
171.5±2.18
B
32.9±1.31
175.4±5.66
204.3±5.38
292.9±8.82
176.4±3.28
Gender
33.5±1.51
168.0±3.09
209.2±5.36
276.1±2.35b
171.7±1.71
29.7±1.21
170.0±7.61
209.3±7.51
295.5±7.95a
176.1±3.62
P-value2
Strains
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Gender
NS
NS
NS
*
NS
Str.×Gen.
NS
*
NS
**
NS
1Means ± S.D. (n=7).
2Provability of contrast: NS, no significant; * P<0.05, ** P<0.01.
a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05).
Table 4. Average body weight gains (g/bird) of Korean Native Ducks
Treatment
Weeks
0 2
2 4
4 6
6 8
0 8
A,
283.0±32.81ab
868.0±8.02
807.7±12.7
494.8±36.7b
2,454±22.9c
A,
224.6±4.80b
870.1±13.9
864.3±57.9
704.1±0.93a
2,663±61.3b
B,
308.3±5.36a
909.4±28.1
807.8±58.2
541.5±49.2b
2,567±59.4bc
B,
264.4±29.1ab
885.7±23.6
925.0±40.5
801.6±36.6a
2,877±31.9a
Strains
A
253.8±19.8
869.1±7.18
836.0±29.4
599.4±49.6
2,558±55.3
B
286.4±16.5
897.5±17.3
866.4±41.1
671.6±64.3
2,722±75.5
Gender
295.6±15.9a
888.7±16.1
807.8±26.7
518.2±29.4b
2,510±38.1b
244.5±15.9b
877.9±12.7
894.6±34.4
752.8±27.3a
2,770±56.9a
P-value2
Strains
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Gender
*
NS
NS
***
**
Str.×Gen.
*
NS
NS
***
**
1Means ± SD (n=7).
2Provability of contrast: NS, no significant; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001.
a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05).
Kim et al. : The Study on Performance of Korean Native Ducks
49
Table 5. Average feed intakes (g/bird) of Korean Native Ducks
Treatment
Weeks
0 2
2 4
4 6
6 8
0 8
A,
452.7±44.11
2,385±53.5ab
2,911±127.6
3,882±47.5b
9,630±148.7
A,
397.1±8.42
2,166±61.4b
3,086±147.2
3,923±74.5b
9,571±226.6
B,
485.4±2.97
2,318±73.6b
2,946±107.8
3,850±54.2b
9,600±152.3
B,
434.5±31.5
2,594±83.3a
2,773±96.5
4,351±102.7a
10,153±263.5
Strains
A
424.9±23.6
2,275±60.9
2,998±95.4
3,902±40.6
9,600±121.9
B
460.0±18.2
2,456±79.3
2,860±75.4
4,101±123.4
9,876±183.9
Gender
469.1±21.1
2,351±43.3
2,929±75.1
3,866±32.9b
9,615±95.4
415.8±16.8
2,380±106.3
2,930±105.2
4,137±111.3a
9,862±202.6
P-value2
Strains
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Gender
NS
NS
NS
*
NS
Str.×Gen.
NS
*
NS
**
NS
1Means ± SD (n=7).
2Provability of contrast: NS, no significant; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01.
a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05).
Table 6. Feed conversion ratio of Korean Native Ducks
Treatment
Weeks
0 2
2 4
4 6
6 8
0 8
A,
1.61±0.031b
2.75±0.09ab
3.61±0.21
7.92±0.53a
3.92±0.08a
A,
1.77±0.02a
2.49±0.03c
3.59±0.21
5.57±0.11b
3.59±0.06b
B,
1.58±0.02b
2.55±0.04bc
3.70±0.41
7.23±0.63a
3.74±0.06ab
B,
1.66±0.08ab
2.93±0.11a
3.01±0.21
5.45±0.23b
3.52±0.08b
Strains
A
1.69±0.04
2.62±0.07
3.60±0.13
6.75±0.58
3.76±0.08
B
1.62±0.04
2.74±0.11
3.36±0.25
6.34±0.51
3.64±0.07
Gender
1.59±0.02b
2.65±0.06
3.66±0.21
7.57±0.41a
3.83±0.06a
1.71±0.04a
2.71±0.11
3.30±0.18
5.51±0.12b
3.56±0.05b
P-value2
Strains
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Gender
*
NS
NS
***
**
Str.×Gen.
*
**
NS
**
*
1Means ± SD (n=7).
2Provability of contrast: NS, no significant; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001.
a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05).
:
50
, (P<
0.05, P<0.01).
, 0 2 (P<0.05),
6 8 0 8 (P<0.001, P<0.01).
A, B 6 , 7 8
Table 7 .
8 B (P<0.01), 8
A B (P<0.05).
(P>0.05), 7 8 6
(P<0.01), 7 8
.
Table 7. Carcass ratio (%) of Korean Native Ducks
Treatments
Body weight (g)
Carcass ratio
(%)
Live
Carcass
A, 6 weeks
2,435±160.71c
1,620±84.6c
66.7±1.37b
A, 7 weeks
2,858±145.2bc
1,968±88.5bc
68.9±0.96ab
A, 8 weeks
3,035±224.9ab
2,130±183.4ab
70.1±1.01a
B, 6 weeks
2,448±84.8c
1,617±44.1c
66.1±0.91b
B, 7 weeks
2,727±151.7bc
1,860±109.7bc
68.2±0.58ab
B, 8 weeks
3,412±118.4a
2,398±76.2a
70.3±0.29a
Strains
A
2,776±126.7
1,906±98.6
68.6±0.76
B
2,862±155.5
1,958±122.4
68.2±0.69
Weeks
6 weeks
2,442±81.3c
1,618±42.7c
66.4±0.75b
7 weeks
2,793±98.4b
1,914±67.5b
68.5±0.53a
8 weeks
3,223±141.5a
2,264±107.1a
70.2±0.47a
P-value2
Strains
NS
NS
NS
Weeks
***
***
**
Strains×weeks
**
**
*
1Means ± SD (n=7).
2Provability of contrast: NS, no significant; * P<0.05; ** P<
0.01; *** P<0.001.
a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same column differ
significantly (P<0.05).
(F1) ,
,
( , 2006).
.
, 0 50.6±
0.41 g(NRC, 1994; Baeza et al., 2010; , 2005;
, 2010), 1 244.8±5.33 g(NRC, 1994;
, 2010), 2 651.3±68.5 g(NRC, 1994; Baeza et al., 2010;
, 2005; , 2010), 3 1,241±188.8
g(NRC, 1994; , 2010; , 2010), 4
2,052± 130.1 g(NRC, 1994; , 2005;
, 2010), 5 2,575±252.8 g(NRC, 1994; Farhat and Chavez,
2000; Baeza et al., 2010; , 2010), 6 3,086±
290.5 g (NRC, 1994; Farhat and Chavez, 2000;
, 2005; , 2010), 7 3,612±171.7 g(NRC, 1994;
Farhat and Chavez, 2000; , 2010) 8 3758±
283.4 g(NRC, 1994; Baeza et al., 2010; , 2010;
, 2010) . , (2010)
0 43.7 g, 8 1,595 g
, Teguia et al.(2008)
, .
A B 0
.
. 2 , 4
, 6 8
, 8
(2010) 8 (1,711 kg)
, (3,710 kg)
.
,
.
(NRC,
1994; , 2005; , 2010)
, . , 0 2
,
. 2 6
. (2010)
0 3
Kim et al. : The Study on Performance of Korean Native Ducks
51
, 3 8
, .
NRC(1994) ,
, 3
, 3
, 8
.
androgen
(Scow and Roe, 1953; Kochakian and
Tillotson, 1957), (1977)
.
.
, 6 8
, . 0 8
, × .
Baeza et al.(2010) 0 8
173.95 g 175.92 g , 0 8
.
. (1,641
kg) , 0 2
(NRC, 1994; , 2005; , 2010)
, 2
.
,
,
.
,
6 8
, 0 8
× .
(2005) 0 2 1.53,
2 4 1.91, 4 6 5.83 0 6 2.84
. NRC(1994)
0 2 1.38 1.40, 2 4
2.83 2.87, 4 6 5.45 5.53, 6 8 10.69
11.34 0 8 4.71 4.78 . 4
(2005) ,
4 6 NRC(1994) (2005)
, 6 8 NRC(1994)
. 0 8 3.83 3.56
(2010) , Baeza et al.
(2010) , NRC(1994)
.
,
.
Table 2 .
Table 2 105
, Table 7
7
.
, ×
. 8
(2010) 6 (3,294
kg) (2,547 kg) .
, (2005) Farhat and
Chavez(2000) 6 73.7%
, (2005) 70.1%,
(2010) 70.1%, 71.2%
8 .
(2007) 65.6%, 65.7%
, (2010) 65.4%
6 .
,
65 67% ,
6 .
7 , 7
8 8
, 7
.
.
. A B
:
52
210
420 . 2
(A, B) 2 ( , ) 2×2
4 , 7 , 15
. 2, 4,
6 8 (P>0.05),
2 , 8
(P<0.01). 6 8
(P<0.05).
,
(P<0.01).
(P>0.05), 6 8
(P<0.05).
,
0 2 (P<0.05), 6 8 (P<0.01).
8 B
(P<0.01), 8 A B
(P<0.05).
.
( : , , , )
2010
, .
Baeza E, Salichon MR, Marche G, Warcrenier N, Dominguez
B, Culioli J 2010 Effects of age and sex on the structural,
chemical and technological characteristics of mule duck
meat. Br Poult Sci 41:300-307.
Duncan DB 1955 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Bio-
metrics 11:1-42.
Farchat A, Chavez ER 2000 Comparative performance, blood
chemistry, and carcass composition of two lines of Pekin
ducks reared mixed of separated by sex. Poultry Sci 79:
460-465.
Kochakian CD, Tillotson C. 1957. Influence of several C19
steroids on the growth of individual muscles of the guinea
pig. Endochrinology 60:607-618.
National Research Council 1994 Nutrient Requirements of
Poultry. 9th rev ed. National Academy Press Washington
DC.
SAS 2002 SAS/STAT Software for PC. SAS Institute, Cary,
NC, USA.
Scow RO, Roe JH Jr 1953 Effect of testosterone propionate
on the weight and myoglobin content of striated muscles
on gonadectomized guinea pigs. Am J Physiol 173:22-28.
Teguia A, Mafouo Ngandjou H, Defang H, Tchoumboue J
2008 Study of the live body weight and body characte-
ristics of the African Muscovy duck (Caraina moschata).
Trop Anim Health Prod 40:5-10.
2005 -
.
32(4):245-254.
2010
.
37:229-235.
2006
. .
2010
.
37:389-398.
2011
.
2007
.
27:203-208.
2005
.
32:81-87.
1999
. .
2007 .
, , 1977
. 48:308-314.
( : 2012. 1. 4, : 2012. 3. 6, : 2012. 3. 8)