Content uploaded by Emre Durdağ
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Emre Durdağ on Jan 01, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Case Report
Turk Neurosurg 2014, Vol: 24, No: 4, 602-605602
Receved: 25.09.2013 / Accepted: 22.10.2013
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.9328-13.1
ABSTRACT
The knowledge of mnmal nvasve spnal surgery has ncreased greatly n recent years. A current ssue s the hydrogel mplant nserted through
nucleus pulposus. In ths paper we present a case n whch the hydrogel mplant was found to be fragmented nto the spnal canal at follow
up. The patent was a 40-year-old female. She was examned at another clnc because of low back pan about four months ago, and a hydrogel
mplant was nserted at the L5-S1 level. She was admtted to our clnc due to severe radcular pan. Magnetc resonance magng (MRI) showed
a posterolateral annular tear only and she was explored mcroneurosurgcally as she dd not beneft from a foramnal njecton. A fragmented
hydrogel mplant that compressed the spnal root was seen peroperatvely and t was excsed. Postoperatvely the radcular complants of the
patent dsappeared and she was dscharged wth total recovery. Although rare, complcatons causng compresson of neural structures can
be seen after placng mplants nto the dsc. In ths case, the assessment of the patent accordng to the clncal presentaton and mcrosurgcal
exploraton f necessary are mportant.
KEywORDS: Gelstx
TM
, Epdural space, Fragmentaton
ÖZ
Son yıllarda mnmal nvazv spnal cerrahde büyük blg brkm kazanılmıştır. Güncel br konu da nükleus çne yerleştrlen hdrojel
mplantlarıdır. Bu çalışmada daha önce başka br klnkte hdrojel mplantı konulan ancak takbnde mplantı spnal kanala fragmante olan
br olgumuzu sunmak stedk. Kırk yaşında kadın hasta yaklaşık dört ay önce başka br klnkte bel ağrısı nedenyle tetkk edlmş ve L5-S1
sevyesne hdrojel mplantı konulmuş. Hastanın şddetl radküler ağrısı olması üzerne klnğmze başvurdu. Sol bacağında yaklaşık 10
derecede Laseque test müspetlğ saptanan hasta tetkk edld. Manyetk rezonans ncelemesnde sadece sol L5-S1 posterolateral annuler
yırtık saptanan ve foramnal enjeksyondan rahatlamayan hasta mkroşrürjkal teknkle eksplore edld. Peroperatf zlemde spnal kanala
bası yapan fragmante hdrojel mplantı görüldü ve eksze edld. Post-operatf radküler yakınması geçen hasta şfa le taburcu edld. Dsk ç
mplant yerleştrlmes sonrasında nadr de olsa nöral yapıları basılayablecek komplkasyonlar görüleblmektedr. Bu durumda hastanın klnk
durumuna göre değerlendrlmes ve gerekyorsa mkroşrurjkal olarak eksplorasyonu önemldr.
ANAHTAR SÖZCÜKLER: Gelstx
TM
, Epdural aralık, Fragmantasyon
Correspondng Author: Emre DURDAG / E-mail: emredurdag@yahoo.com
Emre DURDAG
1
, Omer AYDEN
1
, Serdal ALBAYRAK
1
, ıbrahim Burak ATCı
1
, Ercan ARMAGAN
2
1
Elazig Education and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Elazig
2
Private Medical Park Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Elazig
Presented in: 27th Annual Congress of Turkish Neurosurgical Society, poster presentation, 12-16 April 2013, Antalya, Turkey.
Fragmentaton to Epdural Space: Frst Documented
Complcaton of Gelstx
TM
Epidural Mesafeye Fragmantasyon: Gelstix
TM
’in Dökümante Edilen İlk
Komplikasyonu
INTRODUCTION
Low back pain is the second most frequent cause of work
loss, and its global prevalence in the 20-50 years age group
is 60% to 80% (3, 4). This pain usually ceases but can become
chronic. The most common cause of chronic low back pain
is degenerative disc disease (DDD), and environmental
and genetic factors are accused. There are many studies
related to DDD. In the degeneration process of the disc, it
is proven that decline of pH in the disc and deterioration of
disc perfusion together with impairment of type-2 collagen
formation occurs and leads to diminished water content in
the nucleus. This is followed by increased formation of type-1
collagen. The disc content becomes harder and inexible, and
neovascularization and reinnervation occurs in the annulus
(1).
Treatment options include conservative and surgical
approaches. Increased knowledge on DDD pathophysiology
has accelerated the development of some minimally invasive
percutaneous procedures that can aect degenerative
process positively. Application of hydrogel implants to
increase the amount of water in the disc space has become
popular (3,4,5). In this article, we would like to present the rst
known complication of a hydrogel implant.
CASE REPORT
A 40-year-old female patient was examined after low back
pain and severe radicular pain in her left leg. Her medical
history was unremarkable except insertion of a hydrogel
implant with the discography technique at the L5-S1 level at
another hospital four months ago (Figure 1). She claimed that
Presented in: XXII. Annual Scientific Congress of the Turkish Neurosurgical Society,
18-22 April 2008, Antalya, Turkey.
Turk Neurosurg 2014, Vol: 24, No: 4, 602-605 603
Durdag E. et al: Fragmentation of Gelstix
TM
to Epidural Space
she did not benet from the procedure and was experiencing
low back pain after surgery. Her neurological examination
revealed a positive Laseque test in her left leg. There was
signicant weakness in plantar extension of the foot and
diminished Achilles reex. Magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) was normal except for a left paracentral hyperintense
zone at the L5-S1 level. A trial of foraminal steroids provided
no benet. Surgical exploration was decided on due to
the severe nature of the pain and absence of a signicant
radiological evidence that would explain it, and the patient
was underwent microsurgery. Peroperatively, a hydrogel
implant protruding from the annular tear was observed. The
left S1 root was signicantly compressed by the implant.
The implant was excised in two fragments. Pain ceased
immediately postoperatively and the patient was discharged
without any problems (Figure 2AD).
DISCUSSION
DDD aects 10-15 % of adults (10). Surgical treatment plays an
important role in the management of this disease for which a
wide range of treatment approaches are present. Although the
main goal in the evolution of surgical treatment is to decrease
neurological compression, surgery including stabilization and
fusion of the mobile segment is applied afterwards. In order to
protect the moving segment, total intervertebral discectomy
and subsequent application of disc prosthesis or interbody
cages, and addition of dynamic instrumentation techniques
have been used. Despite the fast development of minimally
invasive percutaneous lumbar instrumentation techniques,
the need for general anesthesia in most of the approaches
and unsatisfactory patient satisfaction have led to a search for
new treatment techniques with less invasive percutaneous
approaches (5).
Considering the pathophysiology of DDD, it can be
hypothesized that increasing the amount of water in the
nucleus could increase disc elasticity and decrease the
complaints. Using implants in minimally invasive spinal
surgery has therefore considered, as they were formerly
used in plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery and gynecologic
surgery.
Hydrogel is highly compatible with the surrounding tissue. Its
application volume is low, it causes little inammation, and it
can absorb ten times more water than its own volume (4). Many
studies have been performed before spinal application and
the molecule has been developed. Many in vivo and in vitro
studies by spinal applications of improved hydrogel implants
are present, and it is concluded that hydrogel implants aect
DDD prognosis positively, increase the amount of water in
the disc, increase pH, increase lumber ROM angles and are is
safe to insert (1,2,4,5,6,8,10). Subsequent to these studies, the
developed hydrogels have been used in clinical practice and
the presented trademark is Gelstix
TM
.
Gelstix
TM
is indicated for patients who have adequate disc
height (>3 mm) and black disc feature at MRI, and whose
main complaint is axial discogenic pain when there is no
Figure 1: Sagittal
T2 weighted MRI
imaging of the
patient before
insertion of
Gelstix
TM
annular tear (10). It is inserted into the nucleus pulposus with
the discography technique. After placement, it can absorb
water 10-fold its weight in about 15 minutes (10). Although
little is known about the implant, results of the studies so far
show that the patient benet is favorable (10). (10).
In the evaluation of the patient, it was found that Gelstix was
placed in another clinic four months ago, but there was no
improvement in axial low back pain. Due to severe radicular
pain at follow up, the patient was explored microsurgically
although there was no signicant problem on MRI except
the hiperintense zone on T2-weighted MRI scans. During the
surgery with a classic posterior approach, it was seen that
Gelstix
TM
had fragmented into the epidural space. This might
have happened in two ways:
1: An implant which is placed correctly may come into the
epidural space through a new annular tear. A correctly placed
implant takes a high volume of water in a short time, and can
hardly become fragmented in its former location.
2: An implant that is placed in the bers of the annulus brosus
(false location) may be due to a new or former annular tear by
mobilisation as time passes.
We could not obtain the scopy images of the percutaneous
invervention. Although MRI scans before the insertion of
Gelstix
TM
did not exactly show a black disc on the level of L5-S1,
there was loss of T2 signal at the disc space. Our preoperative
MRI inspection did not show hyperintensity in the disc at the
L5-S1 level that should be seen at the T2 sequence as a proof
of increased hydration (10). Consequently, it is considered that
the implant was incorrectly placed into the annulus bers.
A few complications related to hydrogel usage as dura
adhesive in neurosurgery have been reported (7,9). However,
no complication related to Gelstix
TM
application has been
Turk Neurosurg 2014, Vol: 24, No: 4, 602-605604
Durdag E. et al: Fragmentation of Gelstix
TM
to Epidural Space
reported until now. Our case is therefore important as it
describes the rst complication related to the issue.
CONCLUSION
Diculty during placement during the application of
minimally invasive hydogel implant in the disc can cause
unfavourable results proceeding to surgery. Hyperintensity of
annulus brosus on T2-weighted MRI scans of patients with
hydrogel-based implants may indicate fragmentation of the
implant. The technique of placement is important in order
not to turn minimally invasive surgery into a complication
surgery.
REFERENCES
1. Benz K,Stippich C,Fischer L,Möhl K,Weber K,Lang J, Steen
F, Beinner B, Gaissmaier C, Mollenhauer JA: Intervertebral disc
cell- and hydrogel-supported and spontaneous intervertebral
disc repair in nucleotomized sheep. Eur Spine J21:1758-1768,
2012
2. Benz K,Stippich C,Osswald C,Gaissmaier C,Lembert N,Badke
A, Steck E, Aicher WK, Mollenhauer JA: Rheological and
biological properties of a hydrogel support for cells intended
for intervertebral disc repair. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
13:54, 2012
3. Collin EC,Grad S,Zeugolis DI,Vinatier CS,Clouet JR,Guicheux
JJ, Weiss P, Alini M, Pandit AS: An injectable vehicle for nucleus
pulposus cell-based therapy. Biomaterials 32:2862-2870,
2011
4. Gorapalli D,Seth A,Vournakis J,Whyne C,Akens M,Zhang A,
Demcheva M, Qamirani E, Yee A: Evaluation of a novel poly
N-acetyl glucosamine (pGlcNAc) hydrogel for treatment of
the degenerating intervertebral disc. Life Sci 17:1328-1335,
2012
5. Kranenburg HJ,Meij BP, Onis D, van der Veen AJ, Saralidze
K,Smolders LA, Huizinga JG,Knetsch ML,Luijten PR,Visser
F, Voorhout G, Dhert WJ,Hazewinkel HA, Koole LH: Design,
synthesis, imaging, and biomechanics of a softness-gradient
hydrogel nucleus pulposus prosthesis in a canine lumbar
spine model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100:
2148-2155, 2012
Figure 2: A Pre-
operative sagittal T2
weighted MRI imaging
of the patient.
B Pre-operative axial T2
weighted MRI imaging
of the patient.
C Operative image
from microscope: White
star: neural root, white
arrow: fragmented
Gelstix
TM
.
D Excised fragment of
Gelstix
TM
.
A
B
C D
Turk Neurosurg 2014, Vol: 24, No: 4, 602-605 605
Durdag E. et al: Fragmentation of Gelstix
TM
to Epidural Space
9. Thavarajah D,De Lacy P,Hussain R,Redfern RM: Postoperative
cervical cord compression induced by hydrogel (DuraSeal).
Spine 35:25-26,2010
10. Yue JJ, Morgenstern R, Morgenstern C, Lauryssen C: Shape
memory hydrogels – A novel material for treating age-
related degenerative conditions of the spine. European
Musculoskeletal Review 6:184–188, 2011
6. Malhotra NR,Han WM,Beckstein J,Cloyd J,Chen W,Elliott DM:
An injectable nucleus pulposus implant restores compressive
range of motion in the bovine disc. Spine 37(18):1099-1105,
2012
7. Mulder M,Crosier J,Dunn R: Cauda equina compression by
hydrogel dural sealant after a laminotomy and discectomy.
Spine 34:E144-148, 2009
8. Nakashima S, Matsuyama Y, Takahashi K, Satoh T, Koie
H, Kanayama K, Tsuji T, Maruyama K, Imagama S, Sakai
Y, Ishiguro N: Regeneration of intervertebral disc by the
intradiscal application of cross-linked hyaluronate hydrogel
and cross-linked chondroitin sulfate hydrogel in a rabbit
model of intervertebral disc injury. Bio-Medical Materials and
Engineering 19:421–429, 2009