Technical ReportPDF Available

The Carbon Cost of Christmas

Authors:

Abstract

Christmas time is accompanied by seasonal increases in our level of consumption. From eating and drinking to giving and receiving, it is the time of the year when we do things to excess. Unfortunately, it also means we are likely to have a greater impact on the environment. Our total consumption and spending on food, travel, lighting and gifts over three days of festivities could result in as much as 650 kg of carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) per person - equivalent to the weight of 1,000 Christmas puddings! This is 5.5% of our total annual carbon footprint .
Gary Haq, Anne Owen,
Elena Dawkins and John Barrett
The Carbon Cost
of Christmas
The Carbon Cost of Christmas
Gary Haq, Anne Owen, Elena Dawkins
and John Barrett
Stockholm Environment Institute
Kräftriket 2B
106 91 Stockholm
Sweden
Tel: +46 8 674 7070
Fax: +46 8 674 7020
E-mail: postmaster@sei.se
Web: www.sei.se
Publications Manager: Erik Willis
Web Manager: Howard Cambridge
Layout: Richard Clay
Climate Talk is a communication project aimed at raising awareness
and understanding of climate change issues in North Yorkshire.
For further information see: www.climatetalk.org.uk
Copyright © 2007 by the Stockholm Environment Institute
This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educa-
tional or non-prot purposes, without special permission from the copyright holder(s)
provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be
made for resale or other commercial purpose, without the written permission of the
copyright holder(s).
3
CONTENTS
Introduction 4
Christmas Consumption 5
Christmas Food
Christmas Travel
Christmas Lighting
Christmas Shopping
Actions for a Low Carbon Christmas 6
Technical Details 7
“Heaped on the floor, to form a kind of throne,
were turkeys, geese, game, poultry, brawn,
great joints of meat, sucking-pigs, long wreaths
of sausages, mince-pies, plum-puddings, barrels
of oysters, red-hot chestnuts, cherry-checked
apples, juicy oranges, luscious pears, immense
twelfth-cakes, and seething bowls of punch, that
made the chamber dim with delicious delight.”
“A Christmas Carol” by Charles Dickens
4
The Carbon Cost of Christmas
Christmas time is accompanied by seasonal
increases in our level of consumption.
From eating and drinking to giving and
receiving, it is the time of the year when we
do things to excess. Unfortunately, it also
means we are likely to have a greater impact
on the environment. Our total consumption
and spending on food, travel, lighting and gifts
over three days of festivities1 could result in as
much as 650 kg2 of carbon dioxide emissions
(CO2) per person - equivalent to the weight of
1,000 Christmas puddings!3 This is 5.5% of
our total annual carbon footprint4.
1 Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and Boxing
Day
2 This is from food (26 kg), travel (96 kg), light-
ing (218 kg) and consumables (310 kg)
3 Based on the net weight of a Christmas Pud-
ding being 650 g
4 Based on the UK average footprint of
11.87 tons/person/year
However, we can still have a good Christmas
and be kind to the planet. With a bit of
thought we can limit the impact we have on
the environment this Christmas and still have
a great time. There are a number of actions
we can all take which can reduce our CO2
emissions by over 60% to 250 kg5. This
is equivalent to a saving in weight to 615
Christmas puddings.
In this time of seasonal goodwill, we should
all spare a thought for the planet.
5 This is due to savings from food (16 kg),
travel (63 kg), lighting (2 kg) and consumables
(169 kg)
Introduction
Cost of Christmas in Carbon Dioxide (kg) and Christmas Puddings
CO2/person (kg) Equivalent weight in
Christmas Puddings1
Christmas food 26 40
Christmas car travel 96 148
Extravagant Christmas Lighting 218 335
Christmas shopping 310 477
Total 650 1000
1Assuming an average Christmas pudding weighs 650 grams
5
Stockholm Environment Institute
CHRISTMAS FOOD
The average person will produce 26 kg of
CO2 from the food they consume during
the Christmas period.1
A vegetarian Christmas would result in a
saving of 3 kg of CO2/person.
An organic Christmas (50 per cent of
food consumed being organic) would
result in a saving of 2 kg of CO2/person.
A low waste Christmas could result in a
saving of 7 kg of CO2/person.
Christmas dinner will result in a mountain
of raw vegetable waste - the shells of
approximately 240 million Brussels sprouts
and the peelings of 105 million potatoes, 20
million parsnips and 30 million carrots.6
A combination of a vegetarian, organic, low
waste Christmas can reduce your Christmas
food footprint by as much as 8 kg of CO2/
person to 18 kg.
CHRISTMAS TRAVEL
At Christmas we will travel approximately
three billion miles to visit family and
friends. This is equiavlent to the average
Briton travelling 121 miles over the festive
period.7 If all festive travel was undertaken
by car this could result in an additional 96 kg
of CO2/person being produced.
Switching from travelling by car to travelling
by train can result in a saving of 63 kg of
CO2/person.
6 RecycleNow (2007) www.recyclenow.com/
home_composting/news/highlights/compost_has_
real.html
7 Travelodge (2006) www.travelodge.co.uk/
press/article.php?id=197
CHRISTMAS LIGHTING
Extravagant outdoor Christmas lighting
displays can add £75 on to your electricity
bill.8 This additional lighting can result in 500
kg more CO2/household9. This is 12.5 times
more CO2 than using a regular set of 160 bulb
fairy lights which produces only 40 kg of CO2/
household.10 Alternatively, energy efcient
LED bulbs use only 5 kg of CO2/household.
CHRISTMAS SHOPPING
This year each person will spend an average
£435 on Christmas gifts, of which, the
most popular choices will be clothes, books,
lms, music, cosmetics and fragrances.11
Spending £435 on these items means 310
kg of CO2/person – about 20 per cent of the
average yearly consumable footprint of 1,500
kg.12
Approximately £4 billion is spent on entirely
unwanted gifts equivalent to £92 per
person.13 Nationally, this is equivalent to 4.8
million tonnes of CO2 being produced from
unwanted gifts.14
8 Energy Saving Trust (2005) www.energysav-
ingtrust.org.uk/aboutest/news/pressreleas-
esarchive/index.cfm?mode=view&press_id=468
9 This is 218 kg per person based on average
housing occupancies
10 Based on being lit for six weeks for 12 hours a
day
11 APCAS (2007) www.uswitch.com/news/credit-
cards/OctDec2007/apacs-releases-xmas-spend-
ing-prediction.cmsx?ref=google_uk
12 Based on annual proportional expenditure
and assuming an average per capita spending
of £158.31 on Clothing, £25.23 on household
appliances, £86.34 on audio-visual, photo and
information processing equipment, £92.75 on
recreational equipment, £48.16 on newspapers,
books and stationary, £24.21 on personal effects
13 ICM (2006) www.guardian.co.uk/christ-
mas2006/story/0,,1978791,00.html
14 Based on a UK population of 60 million
Christmas Consumption
6
The Carbon Cost of Christmas
About 80 kg of CO2/person could be saved
if unwanted gifts were not bought in the rst
place. Not giving unwanted goods could bring
the Christmas shopping footprint down to 230
kg of CO2/person.
UK households spent almost twice as much on
ethical goods last year as they did ve years
ago. 15 If the average UK shopper bought one
third of their gifts as ethical or low carbon
such as recycled wine glasses or charity gifts
the Christmas shopping footprint could be
reduced to 200 kg.
15 Cooperative Bank (2007) //news.bbc.
co.uk/1/hi/business/7120458.stm
The average Briton spends £7.40 sending
Christmas cards at Christmas. The impact
from Christmas cards is 5 kg of CO2/person.
Reusing cards or buying cards from charity
shops is a greener choice. Using email or
the phone would reduce the impact even
further.16
16 It is estimated that following all shopping
recommendations - only buying wanted gifts, a
proportion of which are ethical, and not send-
ing Christmas chards can reduce emissions from
consumables to 169 kg of CO2/person
7
Stockholm Environment Institute
Actions for a Low Carbon Christmas
FOOD
Support your local economy and
try buying from local organic
suppliers.
Compost your vegetable peelings
after you’ve nished cooking to
make sure that this extra organic
waste doesn’t head straight to
landll.
Plan your meal carefully to reduce
the amount of uneaten food thrown
away – check who likes Brussels
sprouts!
TRAVEL
Plan your Christmas travel to
reduce the distance travelled
and try and use environmentally
friendly modes of transport or car
share.
LIGHTING
Less is more when it come
Christmas lighting! Opt for a small
tasteful lighting display and turn
the fairy lights off before bed and
save both money and carbon.
SHOPPING
When it comes to Christmas
presents buy quality not quantity.
Well-made goods last longer and
will not have to be replaced in the
New Year.
A good Christmas gift doesn’t
necessarily have to be expensive.
Think about giving alternative
gifts such as a charity or
environmentally friendly gift, an
experience or giving your time.
Give your unwanted gifts to charity
or to local hospitals or hospices.
Potential Savings at Christmas in Carbon Dioxide (kg) and Christmas Puddings
Potential CO2 savings/
person (kg)
Equivalent weight in
Christmas puddings1
Food
Vegetarian Christmas 3 5
Organic Christmas (50%) 2 3
Low waste (composting food) 7 11
A combination of vegetarian/organic/low waste
christmas 8 12
Travel
Taking the train to family and friends 63 97
Lighting
Using a regular a set of energy efficient LED
fairy lights rather than an extravagant display 216 332
Shopping
Not buying unwanted Christmas gifts 80 123
Not sending Christmas cards 5 8
1Assuming an average Christmas pudding weighs 650 grams
8
The Carbon Cost of Christmas
CHRISTMAS FOOD
The food footprint for the average person in
the UK is 412 kg of CO2 per year. During the
Christmas period (3 days of festivities), the
average household will spend £169 on food
and drink this year.17 This equates to £73 per
person and a Christmas food footprint of 26
kg. Replacing the meat with vegetables can
reduce the Christmas food footprint to 23 kg.
Alternatively, replacing food with organic
options can reduce the footprint to 22 kg of
CO2/person.
Between one third and one quarter of the
food we buy is thrown away.18 By shopping
carefully and planning meals more efciently
we can limit food waste and reduce the
Christmas food footprint to 19 kg per person.
A vegetarian, organic, low waste Christmas
has a food footprint of 18kg CO2/person.
CHRISTMAS TRAVEL
On a normal day, the average Briton travels
24 miles which has a footprint of 14 kg of
CO2/person associated with it. During the
Christmas period the average Briton will
travel 121 miles to visit family and friends. If
this travel is by car, the footprint increases to
96 kg.19 By switching from travelling by car to
travelling by train, the footprint of Christmas
travel can be reduced to 36 kg.
17 www.specialityfoodmagazine.com/site/index.
php/site/view/retail_christmas_will_bring_a_
boost/
18 RecycleNow (2007) www.recyclenow.com/
home_composting/news/highlights/compost_has_
real.html
19 Travelodge (2006) www.travelodge.co.uk/
press/article.php?id=197
CHRISTMAS LIGHTING
An average household’s footprint from
lighting their home and running their
appliances for one year is 1800 kg of CO2.
Those households with very extravagant
Christmas lighting displays can add £75 on
to their electricity bill20. These additional
lighting costs can increase your footprint by
500 kg per household. Switching from an
over the top display to 160 regular bulb fairy
lights reduces the footprint to 40kg.21 Using
efcient LED bulbs can reduce the footprint
to 5 kg per household.
CHRISTMAS SHOPPING
The footprint associated with consumables
is 1500 kg of CO2/person per year. This year
each person will spend an average of £435 on
Christmas gifts, of which, the most popular
choices will be clothes, books, lms, music,
cosmetics and fragrances22. The footprint of
spending £435 on these items is 310kg – one
fth of your yearly amount!
A study has shown that £4 billon is spent
on entirely unwanted gifts equivalent to
£92 per person23. If the unwanted gifts were
not bought in the rst place, the Christmas
shopping footprint would reduce to 230 kg
per person.
20 Energy Saving Trust (2005) www.energysav-
ingtust.org.uk/aboutest/news/pressreleasearchive/
index.cfm?mode=view&press_id=468
21 Based on being lit for six weeks for 12 hours a
day
22 APCAS (2007) www.uswitch.com/news/credit-
cards/OctDec2007/apacs-releases-xmas-spend-
ing-prediction.cmsx?ref=google_uk
23 ICM (2006) www.guardian.co.uk/christ-
mas2006/story/0,,1978791,00.html
Technical Details
9
Stockholm Environment Institute
UK households spent almost twice as much
on ethical goods last year as they did ve
years ago. 24 If the average UK shopper
bought one third of their gifts as ethical or
low carbon such as recycled wine glasses or
charity gifts from Oxfam, the footprint could
reduce to 200 kg.
The average Briton spends £7.40 sending
Christmas cards at Christmas. The impact
from Christmas cards is 5kg of CO2. Reusing
cards or buying cards from charity shops is
a greener choice. Using email or the phone
would reduce the impact even further.
24 Cooperative Bank (2007) //news.bbc.
co.uk/1/hi/business/7120458.stm
TOTAL CHRISTMAS FOOTPRINT
The total impact from Christmas could be
as much as 650 kg per person. Following
the tips above, the impact can be reduced
by over 60% to 250 kg per person.
A MERRY LOW CARBON
CHRISTMAS TO EVERY
ONE OF YOU!
Calculations produced by the
Stockholm Environment Institute,
University of York, using the
Resource and Energy Analysis
Program (REAP) model
R
Stockholm Centre
Kräftriket 2B
SE -106 91 Stockholm
Sweden
Tel+46 8 674 7070
York Centre
University of York
Heslington
York YO10 5DD
UK
Tel+44 1904 43 2897
U.S. Centre
11 Curtis Avenue
Somerville, MA 02144
USA
Tel+1 617 627-3786
Tallinn
Lai 34, Box 160
EE-10502, Tallinn
Estonia
Tel+372 6 276 100
Centre
Oxford Centre
Suite 193
266 Banbury Road,
Oxford, OX2 7DL
UK
Tel+44 1865 426316
The Stockholm Environment Institute
SEI is an independent, international research institute specializing in sustainable development
and environment issues. It works at local, national, regional and global policy levels. The SEI
research programmes aim to clarify the requirements, strategies and policies for a transition to
sustainability. These goals are linked to the principles advocated in Agenda 21 and the
Conventions such as Climate Change, Ozone Layer Protection and Biological Diversity. SEI along
with its predecessor, the Beijer Institute, has been engaged in major environment and
development issues for a quarter of a century.
www.sei.se
Asia Centre
15th Floor, Witthyakit Building
254 Chulalongkorn University
Chulalongkorn Soi 64
Phyathai Road, Pathumwan
Bangkok 10330
Tel+(66) 22514415
Thailand
... Gift-giving at Christmas is frequently lamented by environmental organisations as a practice with significant environmental impact, yet the ways in which this Christmas 'tradition' shapes environmental outcomes has received only a little research attention (Hencock and Rehn, 2011;Stichnothe et al., 2008;Haq et al., 2007;Australian Conservation Foundation, nd). Bryant (2010) refers to Christmas as the world's greatest annual environmental disaster, with Christmas not only symbolic of hyper-capitalism, but constitutive of it. ...
... As a period of intensified consumption, Christmas may not simply mirror but indeed compound environmental issues. For example, one study concluded that in the United Kingdom, Christmas accounts for 5.5% of annual household carbon dioxide emissions, from a time period less than 1% of the year (Haq et al., 2007). Further, some £4 billion was spent on unwanted gifts each year. ...
... Further, some £4 billion was spent on unwanted gifts each year. If unwanted gifts were not bought in the first place, the carbon footprint of Christmas shopping would be reduced by 80 kg CO2-e per person (Haq et al., 2007). While the environmental impact of Christmas is beginning to be studied, and it is certainly widely feared, this part of the debate is not our concern in this paper. ...
Article
This paper explores the proposition that gifting is a little recognised yet important practice bound up in the quest for sustainable consumption, which has largely been studied with reference to market rather than gift economies. It draws on gift theories in economic anthropology which explain gifts as engendering social relations of reciprocity and beyond, and shaping social life differently to commodities. Understanding how and why commodities become gifts (and vice versa), we contend, provides a new way of understanding some of the complex ways in which social relations are implicated in sustainable consumption. We use a study of Christmas gifting practices within a group of environmentally engaged households to begin to empirically explore if and how environmental considerations are expressed in the gift economy. We conclude that the fashioning of a particular social identity, namely, the ‘green consumer’ can operate very differently in the context of gift-exchange than in the context of non-gifting consumption.
... Therefore, movement of people is high during these two periods mostly in the Christian nations. According to Haq et al., (2007), Christians in the world travel for over three billion miles as they visit their families and friends. ...
... This implies that the cost of such parties increases. According toHaq et al. (2007), a person produces an average of 26 kg of Carbon IV Oxide from the food they consume during Christmas holiday. This indicates that people overdo things and take a lot of food during this period. ...
Article
Full-text available
Business organizations are set up with the aim of making a profit. The primary objective of any business is to maximize returns, and all efforts are directed towards this aim. Firms make a profit by selling goods and services to the customers. Therefore, high sales volume would translate to high returns for a company. The amount of goods and services sold by a company depends on the demand. When the demand for products is high, there is an increase in the sales and this translates to economic growth. This implies that there is a direct link between how people consume products and economy. It is worth noting that consumer behavior is a significant determinant of demand. However, consumer behavior is influenced by religion as it affects people’s values and actions. It affects how and when consumers spend their money. This paper investigates how religion influences consumer behavior and the associated impact on the economy.
... On the one hand, festivals such as Christmas are considered as symbolic of hyper-capitalism [73]. The shopping atmosphere at festivals is marked by the "symbolic exchange," where the hedonic, aesthetic, and social considerations outweigh more environmentally sustainable concerns. ...
... For example, Bryant [75] suggests that Christmas is the world's largest annual environmental disaster. Haq et al. [73] conclude that about £4 billion was spent on unwanted fits in the United Kingdom each year. ...
Article
Full-text available
Double-11 shopping festival has become the largest national shopping festival in China. This study investigates the effect of the atmosphere during the Double-11 shopping festival on Chinese people’s sustainable consumption by extending the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). A survey on a sample of 404 Chinese consumers showed that the atmosphere specific to China’s Double-11 shopping festival was negatively associated with consumers’ purchase intention toward sustainable consumption. Moreover, the negative relationship was mediated by consumers’ attitude toward sustainable consumption, the subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control.
... From an environmental point of view, failed gifts create waste. Haq et al (2007) discuss the "carbon cost" of Christmas in the UK, which is to a great extent associated with unwanted gifts. In fact, one in 10 people in the UK throw unwanted gifts in the bin (Recycling and Waste World, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose This paper aims to examine coping approaches used by receivers to deal with failed gift experiences, thereby dealing with misperceptions between givers and receivers that could affect their relationship. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a sequential, multimethod methodology using background questionnaires, online diary method and 27 semi-structured interviews. Findings Receivers cope with failed gift experiences through concealing, disclosing or re-evaluating the gift experience. These approaches encompass several coping strategies, allowing receivers to deal with their experiences in ways that help them manage their relationships with givers. Research limitations/implications Informants described gift experiences in their own terms without being prompted to talk about coping, thus some insights of coping with failed gifts may have been missed. Multiple data collection methods were used to minimise this limitation, and the research findings suggest new avenues for future research. Practical implications The present research helps retailers and brands to minimise gift failure by promoting gifts that emphasise aspects of the giver–receiver relationship, assists givers in their learning from gift failure by making them aware of the receiver’s preferences and reduces the cost of gift failure by offering further opportunities to dispose of unwanted gifts. Originality/value This paper contributes to the emerging topic of consumer coping by providing a novel and rounded understanding of coping in the context of failed gift events, identifying new reasons for gift failure, highlighting receivers’ ethical considerations when responding to failed gifts and proposing new insights for the coping literature.
... In this view, Christopher et al. (2008) calculated the household carbon footprint in USA by using the input-output model. Gary et al. (2008) founded that the carbon footprint produced on Christmas day accounts for 5.5 % of the whole year in England. Chambers et al. (2007) evaluated Hurricane Katrina , s carbon footprint on U.S. gulf coast forest. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Carbon emission has become an important research hotspot under the background of global climate change and low-carbon economy. Studies on the carbon footprint of different industrial spaces help to establish different low-carbon strategies for different regions. In order to evaluate the carbon cycle pressure of different industrial spaces in different regions, using energy consumption and land use data of each region of China from 1999 to 2008, this chapter establishes carbon emission and carbon footprint models based on energy consumption and estimates the carbon emissions from the use of fossil energy and rural biomass energy of different regions in China. By matching the energy consumption items with industrial spaces, this chapter divides industrial spaces into five types: agricultural space, living and industrial-commercial space, transportation industrial space, fishery and water conservancy space, and other industrial space. Then, the carbon emission intensity and carbon footprint of each industrial space in different regions of China are analyzed. Finally, suggestions for decreasing industrial carbon footprint and optimizing industrial space patterns in different regions are provided.
... One defines it as carbon emissions of human activities (Wiedmann et al., 2008;Lee, 2011), that is to measure it with emission amount. In this view, Christopher et al. (2008) calculated household carbon footprint in USA by using the input-output model; Gary et al. (2008) founded that carbon footprint produced at Christmas days accounted for 5.5% of the whole year in England of each year; Jeffrey et al. (2007) evaluated Hurricane Katrina's carbon footprint on U.S. gulf coast forest; based on apparent consumption, Qi et al. (2010) estimated carbon footprint in China from 1992 to 2007 and found it increased nearly 2 times. ...
Article
Full-text available
Study on regional carbon emission is one of the hot topics under the background of global climate change and low-carbon economic development, and also help to establish different low-carbon strategies for different regions. On the basis of energy consumption and land use data of different regions in China from 1999 to 2008, this paper established carbon emission and carbon footprint models based on total energy consumption, and calculated the amount of carbon emissions and carbon footprint in different regions of China from 1999 to 2008. The author also analyzed carbon emission density and per unit area carbon footprint for each region. Finally, advices for decreasing carbon footprint were put forward. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Carbon emissions from total energy consumption increased 129% from 1999 to 2008 in China, but its spatial distribution pattern among different regions just slightly changed, the sorting of carbon emission amount was: Eastern China > Northern China > Central and Southern China > Southwest China > Northwest China. (2) The sorting of carbon emission density was: Eastern China > Northeast China > Central and Southern China > Northern China > Southwest China > Northwest China from 1999 to 2003, but from 2004 Central and Southern China began to have higher carbon emission density than Northeast China, the order of other regions did not change. (3) Carbon footprint increased significantly since the rapid increasing of carbon emissions and less increasing area of productive land in different regions of China from 1999 to 2008. Northern China had the largest carbon footprint, and Northwest China, Eastern China, Northern China, Central and Southern China followed in turn, while Southwest China presented the lowest area of carbon footprint and the highest percentage of carbon absorption. (4) Mainly influenced by regional land area, Northern China presented the highest per unit area carbon footprint and followed by Eastern China, and Northeast China; Central and Southern China, and Northwest China had a similar medium per unit area carbon footprint; Southwest China always had the lowest per unit area carbon footprint. (5) China faced great ecological pressure brought by carbon emission. Some measures should be taken both from reducing carbon emission and increasing carbon absorption.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.