Content uploaded by Gaurav Lalwani
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Gaurav Lalwani on Feb 13, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 745
wileyonlinelibrary.com
www.particle-journal.com
www.MaterialsViews.com
COMMUNICATION
and >1 × 10
−3 M cause necrosis.
[ 22 ] Thus, given the widespread
presence of H
2 O 2 in the body and environment, and the future
impact graphene may have on human health and environment,
systematic studies need to be performed to investigate the direct
chemical interaction between H
2 O 2 and graphene. As a fi rst
step, in this communication, we examine the effects of H
2 O 2
on multilayered pristine graphene at physiologically and envi-
ronmentally relevant concentrations (1–10 000 × 10
−6 M ). [ 19,22,23 ]
Pristine multilayered graphene deposited on nickel wafer
(wafer size = 1 cm × 1 cm, Graphene Supermarket, Calverton,
NY, USA) or directly onto TEM grids was placed in petri dishes
and treated with H
2 O 2 solution at concentrations of 1 × 10
−6 ,
100 × 10
−6 , or 10 000 × 10
−6 M ( n = 4 per group). Graphene incu-
bated with distilled water (DI) served as the control. As H
2 O 2
solutions gradually deteriorate,
[ 22 ] the solutions were aspirated
out every hour and exchanged with fresh solutions. The experi-
ments were terminated after 10 or 25 h. At these time points,
solutions were completely removed, and graphene substrates
were air-dried. Graphene samples before (time t = 0 h) and after
H
2 O 2 treatment (time t = 10 and 25 h) were examined with
transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force micros-
copy (AFM), and confocal Raman spectroscopy (laser excitation
of 532 nm).
Figure 1 shows representative TEM images of graphene-
coated TEM grids incubated with various concentrations of
H
2 O 2 for 10 h. Figure 1 A shows the control graphene sheet
incubated with DI water with no holes or defects, and has
the basic hexagonal lattice of graphene, possessing 0.142 nm
carbon–carbon bond length, occupying ≈0.17 nm
2 area. [ 24 ]
Compared with the control group (Figure 1 A), graphene
with 1 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 treatment after 5 h showed the pres-
ence of randomly distributed small holes as seen in Figure 1 B
(arrows point to few representative holes). The diameter dis-
tribution of holes on graphene was measured by analyzing
multiple ( n = 20) TEM images. Incubation of graphene with
1 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 for 10 h resulted in the formation of holes
ranging from 1 to 15 nm diameter (representing an area
up to 175 nm
2 ). Thus, these visible holes indicate a “cluster
effect,” i.e., the holes, or defect sites are generated initially by
random attack of H
2 O 2 followed by progressive attraction of
more H
2 O 2 to destroy carbon–carbon bonds around the ini-
tial defect sites. This effect is dependent on the concentration
of H
2 O 2 , and enhanced by higher concentrations of H
2 O 2 .
Upon treatment with 100 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 , formation of larger-
sized holes (10–15 nm) was observed (Figure 1 C). Addition-
ally, Figure 1 C also shows formation of lighter (few graphene
layers) and darker regions (multiple graphene layers) indi-
cating the degradation of multilayered graphene. Figure 1 D
shows graphene after incubation with 10 000 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 .
Large-defect sites (10–30 nm) and few graphene layers were
observed corresponding to the degradation of majority of the
graphene sheets.
W. Xing, G. Lalwani, Prof. B. Sitharaman
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook , New York 11794–5281, USA
E-mail: balaji.sitharaman@stonybrook.edu
Dr. I. Rusakova
Texas Center for Superconductivity
and Advanced Materials
University of Houston Science Center
Houston, Texas 77004–5002 , USA
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201300318
Degradation of Graphene by Hydrogen Peroxide
WeiLiang Xing , Gaurav Lalwani , Irene Rusakova , and Balaji Sitharaman *
Graphene, the 2D carbon nanomaterial, is suitable for diverse
applications, ranging from electronics and telecommunication,
to energy and healthcare. Despite its tremendous technological
and commercial prospects, its interactions with biological and
environmental constituents still require thorough examination.
Here, we report that pristine multilayered graphene degrades in
the presence of the naturally occurring, ubiquitous compound
hydrogen peroxide (H
2 O 2 ) at physiologically and environmen-
tally relevant concentrations (1–10 000 × 10
−6 M ) at various time
points (0–25 h).
Graphene, a 2D sheet comprised of sp
2 -hybridized carbon
possessing exciting electrical, mechanical, thermal, and optical
properties,
[ 1 ] has been investigated as enabling components in
fuel cells,
[ 2,3 ] sensors, [ 2,4 ] photocatalysis, [ 5 ] electronics, [ 6 ] compos-
ites,
[ 7 ] electrical and optical biosensors,
[ 8 ] drug delivery,
[ 9 ] tissue
engineering,
[ 10,11 ] and imaging probes.
[ 12 ] Recent reports predict
that graphene may overtake carbon nanotubes in commercial
applications.
[ 13 ] The development of potential graphene-based
commercial technologies for applications in material and bio-
medical sciences has raised concerns about its short-term and
long-term effects on human health and the environment,
[ 14 ]
and leads to multiple investigations to assess and evaluate these
effects.
[ 15 ]
An important attribute to be examined while investigating
graphene's effect on human health and environment is its
bio- and environmental-degradation properties. Several studies
have investigated the biodegradation of carbon nanotubes,
[ 16,17 ]
wherein enzymes such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and
human myeloperoxidase (hMPO) were employed to catalyze
oxidative degradation of these nanomaterials. A recent study
has used a similar strategy on graphene oxide, and exploits the
catalytic activity of HRP enzyme.
[ 18 ] H 2 O 2 is a component of
this degradation process.
H 2 O 2 is a naturally occurring, ubiquitous compound and a
strong oxidizing agent, found in rain and surface water, and
biota.
[ 19,20 ] Its concentration in natural water sources has been
determined to be 1–7 × 10
−3 M . [ 19,21 ] In normal living cells,
diverse cellular pathways synthesize H
2 O 2 in tightly regulated
concentrations varying between 1 × 10
−9 and 700 × 10
−9 M . H 2 O 2
steady-state concentrations >1 × 10
−6 M cause oxidative stress,
Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 745–750
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
746 wileyonlinelibrary.com
www.particle-journal.com www.MaterialsViews.com
COMMUNICATION
AFM was performed (using a previously described proce-
dure)
[ 11 ] to assess the surface topography of graphene sheets
before and after H
2 O 2 treatment. Samples were incubated
with DI water and 10 000 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 for 25 h. Pristine
graphene sheets ( Figure 2 A,C,E) appeared smooth, without
any topographical defects. Randomly distributed holes in
graphene sheets were observed after incubation with H
2 O 2
(Figure 2 B,D,E). The diameter of holes ranged from 5.3 to
13.5 nm. Compared with the height of single graphene sheet
(≈0.34 nm),
[ 18 ] the depth of the holes (9.4–13.5 nm, inset
Figure 2 D) was greater by several folds suggesting the attack of
H
2 O 2 on the inner layers of graphene. Once superfi cial defect
sites are generated, H
2 O 2 may pass through these defect sites
attacking the underlying C–C bonds, and accelerating the deg-
radation of graphene at higher concentrations of H
2 O 2 .
Raman spectroscopy was used to characterize the graphene
samples before and after treatment with H
2 O 2 at every time
point ( Figure 3 ). The ratio of D-band and G-band intensities
( I D / I G ) at all-time points before and after H
2 O 2 treatment are tab-
ulated in Table 1 . The D band indicating the degree of disorder
in sp
2 -hydridized carbon system was observed between 1335 and
1350 cm
−1 , and the G band, indicating stretching of graphitic
carbon, was observed between 1570 and 1580 cm
−1 . [ 25 ] Table 1
shows decrease in the intensity of D and G bands for all groups
treated with various concentration of H
2 O 2 for 25 h, suggesting
a gradual structural degradation of graphene.
[ 26 ] For groups
treated with 1 × 10
−6 and 100 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 , the I D / I G ratio
increased within 10 h of incubation, and decreased at later time
points. Increase in I D / I G ratio during initial time points can be
attributed to increase in the number of defects on graphene, and
is consistent with previous reports on enzymatic degradation of
graphene.
[ 17,18,26 ] The decrease in I D / I G ratio at later time points
can be attributed to disintegration of the multiple layers of gra-
phene due to progressive increase in the defect sizes, exposing
the underlying pristine graphene layers.
[ 26 ] The Raman spectra
from these underlying pristine graphene layers would have an
intense G band, reducing the I D / I G ratio. For the group treated
with 10 000 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 , I D / I G ratio progressively decreased
at all time points, unlike 1 × 10
−6 and 100 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 treat-
ment groups, which showed an initial increase in the I D / I G ratio
within the fi rst 10 h. After 25 h, both D and G bands almost dis-
appeared for the 10 000 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 treatment group.
G ′ band, a characteristic of layered graphene, was observed
at ≈2750 cm
−1 for all treatment groups.
[ 27 ] The intensity of
G′ band increased during the fi rst 10 h of H
2 O 2 treatment,
decreased, and became negligible at later time points. The
G′ band became progressively narrow and down shifted at
increasing time points. Several reports have shown the rela-
tion of G′ band with the number of layers of graphene in which
wider, higher intensity, and an upshift of G′ band corresponds
to increasing number of graphene layers.
[ 25,27,28 ] In this study,
as the degradation progressed, decrease in the width, intensity,
and downshift of G′ band corresponds to progressive, layer-
by-layer degradation of graphene. A layer-by-layer degradation
phenomenon was observed during degradation of multiwalled
carbon nanotubes by HRP.
[ 17,29 ] Furthermore, differences in G′
band peak intensity and width between various H
2 O 2 treatment
groups imply the dependence of graphene degradation rate on
Figure 1. Representative TEM images of multilayered graphene treated with A) deionized water, B) 1 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 , C) 100 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 , and
D) 10 000 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 for 10 h. Arrows in (B) indicate the formation of holes on graphene sheets, and arrows in (C) indicate the formation of lighter
(few graphene layers) and darker regions (multiple graphene layers) suggesting the degradation of multilayered graphene. It should be noted that the
arrows in (B–D) only point to a few representative holes.
Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 745–750
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 747
wileyonlinelibrary.com
www.particle-journal.com
www.MaterialsViews.com
COMMUNICATION
the concentration of hydrogen peroxide, i.e., graphene treated
with 1 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 may degrade at a slower rate compared to
treatment with 10 000 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 .
The above results taken together clearly indicate the deg-
radation of multilayered pristine graphene at a wide range of
H
2 O 2 concentrations found in living systems and environment.
Previous studies report that metal ions such as nickel (Ni), iron
(Fe), and copper (Cu) can catalyze the degradation of H
2 O 2 to
form reactive hydroxyl radicals via the Haber–Weiss reaction.
[ 30 ]
Ni, Fe, or Cu-based substrates or catalysts are used for graphene
Figure 2. Representative AFM images of multilayered graphene on Ni wafer. A,C,E) are topographical scans of pristine graphene samples (incubated
with DI water) and B,D,E) are graphene after 25 h of H
2 O 2 treatment (10 000 × 10
−6 M). Insets in images C and D correspond to the line height profi le.
Images E and F are 3D representations of images C and D, respectively.
Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 745–750
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
748 wileyonlinelibrary.com
www.particle-journal.com www.MaterialsViews.com
COMMUNICATION
synthesis using the chemical vapor deposition method.
[ 31 ] Thus,
in this study, the presence of trace amounts of Ni used during
the CVD synthesis of the graphene may be catalyzing the deg-
radation of graphene during H
2 O 2 treatment. The results also
indicate that rate of degradation of graphene is dependent
on H
2 O 2 exposure concentration; increase in concentration
accelerates graphene’s degradation. The visible holes indicate a
“cluster effect,” i.e., the holes, or defect sites are generated ini-
tially by random attack of H
2 O 2 followed by progressive attrac-
tion of more H
2 O 2 to destroy the carbon–carbon bond around
initial defect sites. Furthermore, reaction temperature may also
infl uence the degradation rate. Additional studies are necessary
Figure 3. Representative Raman spectra of graphene treated with A) 10 000 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 , B) 100 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 , and C) 1 × 10
−6 M H 2 O 2 for a period
of 0, 10, and 25 h. Decrease in the D and G band intensities can be observed after 25 h. Figures D–F show the corresponding I D / I G intensity ratio at
every time point .
Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 745–750
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 749
wileyonlinelibrary.com
www.particle-journal.com
www.MaterialsViews.com
COMMUNICATION
Table 1. I D / I G ratio of multilayered graphene samples before and after
incubation with H
2 O 2 for 25 h.
H
2 O 2 incubation
concentration
I D / I G
ratio
Before incubation After incubation (25 h)
10 000 × 10
−6 M 0.2312 0.1706
100 × 10
−6 M 0.2312 0.1519
1 × 10
−6 M 0.2312 0.1499
Received: September 25, 2013
Revised: December 12, 2013
Published online: February 24, 2014
[1] a) S. Latil , L. Henrard , Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006 , 97 , 036803 ;
b) K. S. Novoselov , A. K. Geim , S. V. Morozov , D. Jiang , Y. Zhang ,
S. V. Dubonos , I. V. Grigorieva , A. A. Firsov , Science 2004 , 306 ,
666 ; c) R. F. Service , Science 2009 , 324 , 875 ; d) A. A. Balandin ,
S. Ghosh , W. Bao , I. Calizo , D. Teweldebrhan , F. Miao , C. N. Lau ,
Nano Lett. 2008 , 8 , 902 ; e) Q. Bao , H. Zhang , Y. Wang , Z. Ni , Y. Yan ,
Z. X. Shen , K. P. Loh , D. Y. Tang , Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009 , 19 , 3077 ;
f) Q. Bao , K. P. Loh , ACS Nano 2012 , 6 , 3677 .
[2] D. R. Kauffman , A. Star , Analyst 2010 , 135 , 2790 .
[3] C. Liu , S. Alwarappan , Z. Chen , X. Kong , C. Z. Li , Biosens. Bioelec-
tron. 2010 , 25 , 1829 .
[4] C. H. Lu , H. H. Yang , C. L. Zhu , X. Chen , G. N. Chen , Angew. Chem
Int. Ed. Engl. 2009 , 48 , 4785 .
[5] a) N. Zhang , Y. Zhang , Y. J. Xu , Nanoscale 2012 , 4 , 5792 ;
b) Y. Zhang , Z. R. Tang , X. Fu , Y. J. Xu , ACS Nano 2010 , 4 , 7303 ;
c) Y. Zhang , N. Zhang , Z. R. Tang , Y. J. Xu , ACS Nano 2012 , 6 , 9777 ;
d) J. G. Radich , P. V. Kamat , ACS Nano 2013 , 7 , 5546 .
[6] a) M. Freitag , Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008 , 3 , 455 ; b) R. M. Westervelt ,
Science 2008 , 320 , 324 .
[7] a) H. Bai , C. Li , X. Wang , G. Shi , Chem. Commun. 2010 , 46 , 2376 ;
b) L. Ren , X. Qi , Y. Liu , Z. Huang , X. Wei , J. Li , L. Yang , J. Zhong , J.
Mater. Chem. 2012 , 22 , 11765 .
[8] a) H. Jang , Y. K. Kim , H. M. Kwon , W. S. Yeo , D. E. Kim , D. H. Min ,
Angew. Chem Int. Ed. Engl. 2010 , 49 , 5703 ; b) M. Zhou , Y. Zhai ,
S. Dong , Anal. Chem. 2009 , 81 , 5603 .
[9] a) X. Sun , Z. Liu , K. Welsher , J. T. Robinson , A. Goodwin , S. Zaric ,
H. Dai , Nano Res. 2008 , 1 , 203 ; b) S. M. Chowdhury , G. Lalwani ,
K. Zhang , J. Y. Yang , K. Neville , B. Sitharaman , Biomaterials 2013 ,
34 , 283 .
[10] a) T. R. Nayak , H. Andersen , V. S. Makam , C. Khaw , S. Bae , X. Xu ,
P. L. Ee , J. H. Ahn , B. H. Hong , G. Pastorin , B. Ozyilmaz , ACS
Nano 2011 , 5 , 4670 ; b) G. Lalwani , A. T. Kwaczala , S. Kanakia ,
S. C. Patel , S. Judex , B. Sitharaman , Carbon N Y 2013 , 53 , 90 .
[11] G. Lalwani , A. M. Henslee , B. Farshid , L. Lin , F. K. Kasper ,
Y. X. Qin , A. G. Mikos , B. Sitharaman , Biomacromolecules 2013 , 14 ,
900 .
[12] a) S. Zhu , J. Zhang , C. Qiao , S. Tang , Y. Li , W. Yuan , B. Li , L. Tian ,
F. Liu , R. Hu , H. Gao , H. Wei , H. Zhang , H. Sun , B. Yang , Chem.
Commun. 2011 , 47 , 6858 ; b) B. S. Paratala , B. D. Jacobson ,
S. Kanakia , L. D. Francis , B. Sitharaman , PLoS One 2012 , 7 , e38185 ;
c) G. Lalwani , X. Cai , L. Nie , L. V. Wang , B. Sitharaman , Photoacous-
tics 2013 , 1 , 62 ; d) S. Kanakia , J. D. Toussaint , S. M. Chowdhury ,
G. Lalwani , T. Tembulkar , T. Button , K. R. Shroyer , W. Moore ,
B. Sitharaman , Int. J. Nanomed. 2013 , 8 , 2821 .
[13] M. Segal , Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009 , 4 , 612 ; Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008 ,
3 , 523 .
[14] A. D. Maynard , R. J. Aitken , T. Butz , V. Colvin , K. Donaldson ,
G. Oberdorster , M. A. Philbert , J. Ryan , A. Seaton , V. Stone ,
S. S. Tinkle , L. Tran , N. J. Walker , D. B. Warheit , Nature 2006 , 444 , 267 .
[15] a) S. Zhang , K. Yang , L. Feng , Z. Liu , Carbon 2011 , 49 , 4040 ;
b) Y. Zhang , S. F. Ali , E. Dervishi , Y. Xu , Z. Li , D. Casciano ,
A. S. Biris , ACS Nano 2010 , 4 , 3181 ; c) S. R. Ryoo , Y. K. Kim ,
M. H. Kim , D. H. Min , ACS Nano 2010 , 4 , 6587 ; d) B. Parvin , I. Refi ,
F. Bunshi , Carbon 2011 , 49 , 3907 ; e) T. S. Sreeprasad , T. Pradeep ,
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2012 , 26 , 1242001 .
[16] a) B. L. Allen , G. P. Kotchey , Y. Chen , N. V. K. Yanamala ,
J. Klein-Seetharaman , V. E. Kagan , A. Star , J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009 ,
131 , 17194 ; b) B. L. Allen , P. D. Kichambare , P. Gou , I. I. Vlasova ,
A. A. Kapralov , N. Konduru , V. E. Kagan , A. Star , Nano Lett. 2008 , 8 ,
3899 ; c) V. E. Kagan , N. V. Konduru , W. Feng , B. L. Allen , J. Conroy ,
Y. Volkov , I. I. Vlasova , N. A. Belikova , N. Yanamala , A. Kapralov ,
Y. Y. Tyurina , J. Shi , E. R. Kisin , A. R. Murray , J. Franks , D. Stolz ,
P. Gou , J. Klein-Seetharaman , B. Fadeel , A. Star , A. A. Shvedova ,
Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010 , 5 , 354 .
[17] Y. Zhao , B. L. Allen , A. Star , J. Phys. Chem. A 2011 , 115 , 9536 .
and currently underway to test the above hypothesis and pro-
vide better understanding of chemical mechanism of H
2 O 2 -
mediated degradation of graphene (interplay of H
2 O 2 concen-
tration, reaction temperature, and presence of metal ions).
A wide variety of catalytic peroxidase enzymes such as MPO,
HRP, and lignin peroxidase (LiP) are present in the body or
environment. Several studies have investigated the effects of
enzymes such as HRP and hMPO on the degradation of single-
and multiwalled carbon nanotubes.
[ 16,17 ] A recent study dem-
onstrated the degradation of graphene oxide in the presence
of HRP.
[ 18 ] These studies indicate that enzymatic degradation
depends on the surface functionalization of carbon nanomate-
rials, and requires pretreatment steps, which include exposure
to strong acids and oxidants prior to enzymatic degradation.
Additionally, this degradation process has been reported to be
effective upon continuous exposure of carbon nanomaterials to
enzyme and H
2 O 2 . Thus, peroxidase enzymes could certainly
accelerate degradation of graphene in the presence of H
2 O 2 . [ 18 ]
However, these enzymes are mainly found in the proximity of
certain animal cells (MPO is secreted by infl ammatory cells—
neutrophils), plant cells (HRP is present in the root of horse-
radish plant), or fungi (LiP is found fungi such as Phanerochaete
chrysosporium ). H 2 O 2 , on the other hand, is not restricted to
these bio-organisms but is ubiquitous in eukaryotic cells,
[ 22 ]
and natural resources (fresh and sea water).
[ 32 ] Our results
strongly suggest that alternative degradation mechanism in the
presence H
2 O 2 at physiologically and environmentally relevant
concentrations (1–10 000 × 10
−6 M ) could initiate and degrade
single- and multilayered pristine graphene. The limitations of
the above study are: (1) while concentrations of H
2 O 2 mimic
those found in physiological and environmental conditions, the
controlled experimental conditions allow all the available H
2 O 2
to interact with graphene; other competing redox processes
in biological systems or environment that require H
2 O 2 were
absent. The presence of these competing processes will impair
the degradation rate. (2) The studies were performed on multi-
layered sheets of pristine graphene. Thus, this study only pro-
vides insights into the surface degradation effect of H
2 O 2 . Bulk
degradation on macroscopic amount of graphene aggregates in
the presence of H
2 O 2 still needs to be determined.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants no.
1DP2OD007394–01).
Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 745–750
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
750 wileyonlinelibrary.com
www.particle-journal.com www.MaterialsViews.com
COMMUNICATION
[18] G. P. Kotchey , B. L. Allen , H. Vedala , N. Yanamala , A. A. Kapralov ,
Y. Y. Tyurina , J. Klein-Seetharaman , V. E. Kagan , A. Star , ACS Nano
2011 , 5 , 2098 .
[19] International Agency for Research on Cancer , in IARC Monographs
on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans ,
Vol. 35 , 1985 .
[20] Pubchem Compound Summary: Hydrogen Peroxide ,
http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid
=784 (accessed August 2013).
[21] Chemical Summary: Hydrogen Peroxide, Environmental Protection
Agency , http://actor.epa.gov/actor/GenericChemicalPdfServlet;jses
sionid=D6A554DDB65663FCF3A4D193C182E719?casrn=7722/84/1
(accessed August 2013).
[22] M. Gulden , A. Jess , J. Kammann , E. Maser , H. Seibert , Free Radic.
Biol. Med. 2010 , 49 , 1298 .
[23] a) H. Nakagawa , K. Hasumi , J. T. Woo , K. Nagai , M. Wachi , Carcino-
genesis 2004 , 25 , 1567 ; b) D. R. Spitz , W. C. Dewey , G. C. Li , J. Cell.
Physiol. 1987 , 131 , 364 .
[24] R. Heyrovska , arXiv:0804.4086 2008 .
[25] M. S. Dresselhaus , A. Jorio , M. Hofmann , G. Dresselhaus , R. Saito ,
Nano Lett. 2010 , 10 , 751 .
[26] J. Russier , C. Menard-Moyon , E. Venturelli , E. Gravel ,
G. Marcolongo , M. Meneghetti , E. Doris , A. Bianco , Nanoscale
2011 , 3 , 893 .
[27] R. P. Vidano , D. B. Fischbach , L. J. Willis , T. M Loehr , Solid State
Commun. 1981 , 39 , 341 .
[28] A. C. Ferrari , J. C. Meyer , V. Scardaci , C. Casiraghi , M. Lazzeri ,
F. Mauri , S. Piscanec , D. Jiang , K. S. Novoselov , S. Roth , A. K. Geim ,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006 , 97 , 187401 .
[29] Z. Qu , G. Wang , J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012 , 12 , 105 .
[30] J. Torreilles , M. C. Guerin , FEBS Lett. 1990 , 272 , 58 .
[31] A. Reina , X. Jia , J. Ho , D. Nezich , H. Son , V. Bulovic ,
M. S. Dresselhaus , J. Kong , Nano Lett. 2009 , 9 , 30 .
[32] a) C. Van Baalen , J. Marler , Nature 1966 , 211 , 951 ; b) D. Price ,
P. J. Worsfold , R. Fauzi , C. Mantoura , Anal. Chim. Acta 1994 , 298 ,
121 .
Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 745–750