A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Consulting Psychology Journal
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
FRONTIER NO MORE: INTERNATIONAL
CONSULTING SKILLS AS NECESSARY
MINIMAL COMPETENCIES FOR
CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGISTS
Rodney L. Lowman
CSPP/Alliant International University–San Diego and Lowman & Richardson,
Consulting Psychologists, San Diego, California
This article identifies and comments on several themes that derive from the Special Issue on
International Organizational Consulting: Consulting Psychology Goes Global. Six issues are
identified that are intended to help integrate the Special Issue articles and to extend the four
factors each article addressed: (1) how can we generalize from cases to actionable proposi-
tions?; (2) does corporate culture trump national culture?; (3) Is country an individual
difference variable?; (4) are there international metacompetencies that consulting psychol-
ogists must know?; (5) who or what is the ethical arbiter in international contexts?; and (6)
how can international organizational consulting psychology skills become routinized?
Keywords: internationalizing, global consulting, multiculturalism, guidelines
This Special Issue on International Organizational Consulting: Consulting Psychology Goes Global
brings into sharp focus the reality that the world has dramatically changed over the last half century
along with demands that consulting psychologists move forward with it. In this brief article, I
comment upon and attempt to extend Cooper’s (this issue, pp. 243–249) four overarching themes,
namely, the critical importance of the cultural context, worldwide organization development,
national and regional economic development, and the role of consultation in facilitating global social
change.
Although the widespread preoccupation with internationalizing in recent years may seem to
have occurred suddenly, the precursors of change have actually been percolating slowly in prodro-
mal stages for many decades. In the United States, for example, the revolutionary changes associated
with race, gender, sexual orientation, and age arguably have paved the way for understanding
diversity in its broader context of internationalism. It is a small— or at least smaller—step to taking
internationalism seriously after battles have been fought for basic rights for racial and sexual
minorities, women, and those with physical disabilities, laying the ground work for acceptance of
diversity in several of its many forms.
Still, the driving forces for organizational consulting psychology (CP) going global is not so
much an imperative to take human rights to the next level as it has been economic and technological
I thank Special Issue Editor Stewart Cooper and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on a prior
draft of this article.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Rodney L. Lowman, Organizational
Psychology Programs, CSPP/Alliant International University–San Diego, 10455 Pomerado Road, San Diego,
CA 92131. E-mail: rlowman@alliant.edu
Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research © 2013 American Psychological Association
2012, Vol. 64, No. 4, 338–343 1065-9293/13/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0031676
338
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.