A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
A Qualitative Investigation of African Americans’ Decision to
Pursue Computing Science Degrees: Implications for Cultivating
Career Choice and Aspiration
LaVar J. Charleston
University of Wisconsin–Madison
According to Pearson (2002), minority groups are not well represented in science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations. Among these under-
represented groups are African Americans. To ensure the economic vitality of the
STEM workforce in the United States, it is imperative to broaden participation in
STEM-related fields and computing sciences in particular (J. F. L. Jackson, Charleston,
George, & Gilbert, in press; Moore, 2006; Pearson, 2002). Using the method of
grounded theory, the author illuminates the experiences of African American comput-
ing aspirants at various levels of academic status (bachelor’s, master’s, and PhD levels).
In doing so, this study identifies the key factors that contribute to study participants’
successful pursuit of computing science degrees, thereby pointing toward implications
for cultivating occupational choice and career aspirations. Study results include a
heuristic model for broadening computing participation.
Keywords: STEM, computer science, African Americans, higher education, broadening
participation
The highest paying positions in the U.S. scien-
tific and technological workforces are overwhelm-
ingly held by White men (Moore, 2006). Con-
trarily, African Americans fill less than 3% of
these same science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics (STEM)-related occupations, with
such workforce participatory patterns predicted to
remain relatively unchanged in lieu of efforts to
diversify representation in the scientific workforce
(Hrabowski & Pearson, 1993; Moore, 2006).
There are many barriers faced by African
Americans on their decision to pursue professions
within STEM disciplines (Charleston & Jackson,
2011). African Americans are among those under-
represented populations that both historically and
consistently demonstrate greater educational
needs upon college admittance because they are
typically underserved by the K–12 education sys-
tem as compared with their White counterparts
(Ashby, 2006). This population is also more likely
to enter the K–12 system without the requisite
math and science knowledge to be successful in
subsequent education levels and careers, specifi-
cally in STEM fields (Charleston & Jackson,
2011; Graham, 1997; Moore, 2006).
The prevalent obstacles that these students en-
counter during undergraduate, graduate, and post-
graduate years can be attributed to a gradual de-
cline in the percentage of African Americans in
the most advanced levels of science and engineer-
ing (American Council on Testing [ACT], 2006;
Ashby, 2006; Graham, 1997). As the aforemen-
tioned historical and educational factors perpetu-
ate this underrepresentation of African Americans
and impede persistence in STEM-related fields,
this qualitative inquiry into the lives of African
American men and women in higher education
computing sciences provides insights that will
positively contribute to this body of research. It
seeks to illuminate how participants negotiate
their educational trajectories in the traditionally
homogeneous field of computing sciences at every
educational attainment level.
Literature Review
There are currently record-low numbers with
regard to participation in STEM disciplines in
the United States. From 1994 to 2003, for ex-
This article was published Online First July 09, 2012.
Correspondence concerning this article should be ad-
dressed to LaVar J. Charleston, Wisconsin’s Equity and
Inclusion Laboratory (Wei Lab), University of Wisconsin
Madison, 561 Educational Sciences, 1025 West Johnson
Street, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: Charleston@wisc.edu
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education © 2012 National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education
2012, Vol. 5, No. 4, 222–243 1938-8926/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0028918
222
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.