ArticlePublisher preview available

A Conceptual Framework for Clinical Work With Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Clients: An Adaptation of the Minority Stress Model

American Psychological Association
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

In the last few years, transgender and gender nonconforming people have become more visible in our society, which has sparked a marked increase in awareness, interest, and attention among psychologists. Questions have emerged about the extent to which psychologists are able to work competently with this population. This article presents a framework for understanding key clinical issues that psychologists who work with transgender and gender nonconforming individuals will likely encounter in their clinical work. This article does not address the knowledge and skills required to provide services related to gender transition, but rather to provide other psychological services that these clients may need, in light of the high levels of gender-related victimization and discrimination to which they are exposed. An adaptation of the Minority Stress Model (Meyer, 2003) is presented and translated to incorporate the unique experiences encountered by transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. In particular, we examine adverse experiences that are closely related to gender identity and expression, resulting expectations for future victimization or rejection, and internalized transphobia. The impact of Minority Stress Model factors on suicide attempts is presented as a detailed example. Mechanisms by which transgender and gender nonconforming persons develop resilience to the negative psychological effects of these adverse experiences are also discussed. Recommendations for clinicians are then made to assist psychologists in developing competence in working with this population.
A Conceptual Framework for Clinical Work With Transgender and Gender
Nonconforming Clients: An Adaptation of the Minority Stress Model
Michael L. Hendricks
Washington Psychological Center, P.C., Washington, D.C. Rylan J. Testa
Palo Alto University
In the last few years, transgender and gender nonconforming people have become more visible in our
society, which has sparked a marked increase in awareness, interest, and attention among psychologists.
Questions have emerged about the extent to which psychologists are able to work competently with this
population. This article presents a framework for understanding key clinical issues that psychologists
who work with transgender and gender nonconforming individuals will likely encounter in their clinical
work. This article does not address the knowledge and skills required to provide services related to gender
transition, but rather to provide other psychological services that these clients may need, in light of the
high levels of gender-related victimization and discrimination to which they are exposed. An adaptation
of the Minority Stress Model (Meyer, 2003) is presented and translated to incorporate the unique
experiences encountered by transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. In particular, we
examine adverse experiences that are closely related to gender identity and expression, resulting
expectations for future victimization or rejection, and internalized transphobia. The impact of Minority
Stress Model factors on suicide attempts is presented as a detailed example. Mechanisms by which
transgender and gender nonconforming persons develop resilience to the negative psychological effects
of these adverse experiences are also discussed. Recommendations for clinicians are then made to assist
psychologists in developing competence in working with this population.
Keywords: transgender, minority stress, suicide attempt, violence, resilience
In the last several years, the popular media have paid increasing
amounts of attention to people who present as transgender or gender
nonconforming, effectively raising the public profile of gender iden-
tity and gender nonconformity, at least in western societies. This
increased attention coincides with greater willingness of trans people
to publicly divulge their identity, and sometimes even share details of
their experience in public domains.
1
In turn, the increased attention
and visibility have resulted in a greater awareness of gender identity
issues, both by those who are trans and by society as a whole.
Concomitantly, mental health practitioners have been called
upon with greater frequency to render evaluation and treatment
services to people who make known that their gender identity does
not conform to the sex they were assigned at birth. Such requests
raise questions about whether psychologists are prepared and
competent to deliver these psychological services. This article
presents a framework within which psychologists may conceptu-
alize the unique stressors often faced by trans clients and how
those experiences are related to both vulnerability and resilience in
the mental health of trans people. Furthermore, we offer that these
experiences may also affect access to and engagement in mental
health services. Clinical implications of these issues will be dis-
cussed, aiming to inform provision of competent services for trans
clients.
In both anticipation of, and response to, this increased request
for psychological services, the American Psychological Associa-
tion (APA) has undertaken efforts both to help psychologists and
other professionals to improve their understanding of gender iden-
tity and gender expression and to ascertain what psychologists
need in order to competently provide services. The APA Task
Force on Gender Identity and Gender Variance (2008) published
its report, which included recommendations for education and
training. Subsequent to this report, the APA Council of Represen-
tatives passed its Resolution on Transgender, Gender Identity, and
Gender Expression Non-Discrimination (Anton, 2009), solidifying
the APA’s commitment to supporting the educational and training
needs of psychologists to work with this population (p. 443):
1
In this article, we use “trans” to refer to the range of persons who
identify or present as transsexual, transgender, or gender nonconforming.
This term was proposed by Lev (2004) and has met with broader accep-
tance than many other terms that have been previously proposed or used.
This article was published Online First August 13, 2012.
MICHAEL L. HENDRICKS received his PhD in Clinical Psychology from The
American University. He maintains a clinical and forensic practice as a
partner at the Washington Psychological Center, P.C., in Washington, D.C.
His areas of professional interest include suicidology, LGBT issues, and
forensic evaluation.
RYLAN J. TESTA received his PhD in Clinical Psychology from Temple
University. He is Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Center for LGBTQ Evidence-
Based Applied Research (CLEAR). He also serves as Program Manager of
the Gender Identity Program, within The Gronowski Center’s Sexual and
Gender Identities Clinic. His research and clinical work focuses on self-
destructive behaviors, including suicidal behavior, substance abuse, eating
disorders, and health risk-taking, in underserved populations.
CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS ARTICLE should be addressed to Michael L.
Hendricks, Washington Psychological Center, P.C., 5225 Wisconsin Avenue,
NW, Suite 513, Washington, DC 20015. E-mail: mhendricksphd@gmail.com
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice © 2012 American Psychological Association
2012, Vol. 43, No. 5, 460– 467 0735-7028/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0029597
460
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Moreover, it is equally imperative to acknowledge differences in lived experiences by one's sexual orientation and gender identity [43,44], underlining the importance of drawing conclusions from MSM-specific research on PrEP use during the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, only one narrative review has focused on MSM [36], of which only 39% of the included studies were based in the U.S. Finally, no existing reviews employed study quality and bias of evidence ratings, warranting a more rigorous synthesis of the quality of existing literature to identify research gaps and limitations of research methodology. ...
... While previous reviews have examined the impact of COVID-19 on HIV/PrEP care in Kenya, India [33], and globally [36], these findings may not be generalizable to the U.S. due to significant variations in COVID-19-related policies and regulations governing PrEP prescriptions across different countries (e.g., policies supporting PrEP recommendation) [37][38][39]. Additionally, no existing review [33][34][35][36] has focused exclusively on MSM, despite notable differences in HIV care by sexual and gender identity [43,44]. Notably, no existing review on this topic has incorporated rigorous and expansion of telehealth and home-delivery PrEP services, may also help ensure continued access to PrEP during similar public health crises. ...
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic substantially impacted the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care continuum among men who have sex with men (MSM). While PrEP use during the pandemic has been studied, regional differences in PrEP regulations highlight the need for U.S.-specific reviews. This scoping review evaluates empirical literature on COVID-19’s impact on PrEP engagement among U.S. MSM. A systematic search on August 29, 2024, identified articles from PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase. Eligible studies (a) collected empirical data from U.S. MSM, (b) assessed COVID-19’s impact on PrEP engagement, and (c) were peer-reviewed, English-language, full-text articles. Standardized forms were used to extract study information. Study quality was appraised using validated tools for qualitative and quantitative research. Findings were synthesized using descriptive statistics and narrative summaries, categorized by distinct pandemic phases. Of 438 records, 21 studies were included (15 quantitative, five qualitative, one mixed-method), mostly conducted during the lockdown phase. Results showed reduced PrEP use (5.9–35.6%), increased missed doses (8.3–14.2%), and higher discontinuation rates (9.0-33.3%) during COVID-19. Barriers included refill issues (9.0–20.0%), limited access to care (2.5–17.0%), disrupted lab testing (~ 25.5%), and changes in clinic procedures. College-aged youth reported confidentiality concerns after returning home. Qualitative evidence highlighted telehealth and injectable PrEP as promising alternatives. This review reveals significant disruptions to PrEP care for U.S. MSM during COVID-19, a lack of post-lockdown research, underrepresentation of MSM from Northeastern and Pacific regions, and limited use of objective PrEP adherence measures. These findings underscore the need for emergency-prepared PrEP services and expanded telehealth and home-delivery options for future crises.
... Compared to the general population, the relative suicide rate among individuals with Gender Dysphoria is increased (e.g., Aitken et al., 2016;García-Vega et al., 2018;Wiepjes et al., 2018). The causes of this increase in the suicide rate are due to a higher prevalence of mental health disorders (Preuss, 2021) due to minority stress (Hendricks and Testa, 2012), lack of supportive structures (Poštuvan et al., 2019), among other factors. Among adolescents as well, an increased suicide risk is observed in trans * compared to cis-identifying individuals (Aitken et al., 2016;Turban et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
We developed and evaluated the Kiel Gender Dysphoria Questionnaire (KGDQ), a tool designed to assess distress due to gender incongruence in individuals aged 18 and above with sensitivity to change. The 31 items of the questionnaire were generated through semi-structured guideline interviews with trans * patients ( n = 7) and experts ( n = 5), which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Additionally, modified items from other questionnaires and the item collection of a working group were considered. Subsequently, the questionnaire was completed online by gender-dysphoric participants ( N = 219). A principal axis analysis revealed a conceptually plausible three-factor structure with the subscales Alienation, Gender Role Pressure, and Body Dysphoria. All subscales demonstrated at least good internal consistency with α ≥ 0.80. A correlational comparison of two testing periods indicated high test-retest reliability ( r = 0.84). The convergent validity with the Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale—Gender Spectrum and the divergent validity with the PHQ-9 module of the Patient Health Questionnaire were only partially demonstrated, as the predetermined thresholds were slightly under ( r < 0.50) or overstepped ( r > 0.40). The assessment of known-groups validity showed expected mean differences. The results suggest that the KGDQ is a reliable and valid instrument for capturing various aspects of gender dysphoria over time.
... For instance, these individuals may use pronouns other than the conventional gendered pronouns used in English and many different languages, and since https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v25i1.780 providers may not have extensive experience delivering care to this group, research suggests a need to disclose their level of knowledge and be willing to consult with experts as needed (Hendricks & Testa, 2012). Nurse Practitioners need to approach their practice mindfully, being intentional advocates for the LGBTQ+ community to help eliminate discrimination in healthcare and move towards eliminating health disparities. ...
Article
Introduction: Clinical cancer screening rates are low among patients who identify as LGBTQ+, especially in rural areas. It is important for rural nurse practitioner (NP) students to be aware of health disparities in cancer screenings among LGBTQ+ and be able to effectively promote cancer screenings in this population. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to determine rural NP students’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of barriers to cancer screenings among LGBTQ+ and to educate NP students on inclusivity related to cancer screenings in this marginalized group. Sample: Nurse practitioner students at a public, rural, liberal arts university Method: Rural NP students participated in an interactive, in-person workshop to which the community was also invited. Didactic information was provided regarding barriers to/awareness of the need for cancer screenings among LGBTQ+ individuals. Students also created educational materials for use in community prevention programming. An anonymized online post-survey assessed NP students’ knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and awareness of cancer screenings among LGBTQ+. Findings: Over 90% of participants (n=62) reported increased knowledge about the healthcare needs of LGBTQ+ populations. The largest mean level of agreement was observed with the statements, “how knowledgeable are you about the healthcare needs of LGBTQ+ populations?” and “how knowledgeable are you about current terms that should be used to increase inclusivity of LGBTQ+ populations in a healthcare setting?”, both resulting in a mean score of 3.52 corresponding with “very knowledgeable”. Three qualitative themes included recognizing the significance of culturally appropriate communication, having increased awareness of recommendations for cancer screening in the LGBTQ+ population, and the importance of reflecting on internal personal biases. Conclusion: Curricular strategies that promote awareness and increase knowledge of LGBTQ+ patient needs are essential to develop a rural NP workforce that can promote health equity and competently care for all patients.
... Minority stress theory hypothesizes that individuals from stigmatized social groups experience chronic stress due to their marginalized status in society, which contributes to adverse mental and physical health outcomes (Hendricks & Testa, 2012;Meyer, 1995). This theory helps to explain why SGM survivors experience disparities in mental health consequences of IPV. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) individuals report disproportionate rates of victimization. The present study examined intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization, adverse mental health issues, and health-related help-seeking behaviors across sexual and gender identity. Methods This study utilized National College Health Assessment Fall 2019 panel data (n = 38,633). Approximately 14% (n = 5,338) of the sample reported IPV victimization during the past 12 months. Logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results SGM college students and cisgender women students tended to report higher rates of IPV victimization, loneliness, psychological distress, suicidality, and self-injury compared to straight/heterosexual students and cisgender men. Despite disparities, SGM survivors and cisgender women survivors had higher health-related service utilization. Bisexual, pansexual, non-binary, and cisgender women IPV survivors were significantly more likely to report intent to seek future mental health care. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for continued research informed by minority stress theory, which posits that SGM populations may experience greater stresses due to stigma, discrimination, and “social stress.” Longitudinal research is needed to understand causal factors and confounders of IPV victimization and mental health disparities among SGM college students. Healthcare professionals may consider screening for suicidality and self-injury, especially among SGM IPV survivors. Understanding these disparities is crucial for tailored support and intervention strategies in university settings.
... Within this model, misgendering can be subsumed under the distal stressor nonaffirmation of gender identity (see Testa et al., 2015 for the model overview). Research on gender minority stress has shown that increased discrimination-related stressors coupled with lower resilience can contribute to poorer mental health (e.g., Budge et al., 2013;Hendricks & Testa, 2012), which explains the higher prevalence of affective disorders in transgender and nonbinary populations (e.g., Reisner et al., 2016). For example, in their study, Jäggi et al. (2018) found that nonaffirmation of gender identity was the most important distal stress factor explaining depressive symptomatology in a transgender population. ...
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, gender-neutral pronouns have emerged in different languages. We review current research on their emergence and offer an interdisciplinary framework for studying and understanding gender-neutral pronouns. Our framework is aimed at sparking and guiding interdisciplinary research on gender-neutral pronouns. The framework incorporates (cross-)linguistic and cognitive aspects of the function, use and processing of gender-neutral pronouns in light of the fact that different language systems (i.e., conceptual vs. grammatical gender languages) require different degrees of linguistic creativity in order to expand the word class of pronouns. Furthermore, we link these linguistic and cognitive considerations with research on the social-psychological effects of the use of gender-neutral pronouns, more specifically on how they affect the well-being of nonbinary people with regard to social stigmatiza-tion and discrimination (minority perspective) as well as how their attitudes are linked with attitudes on non-binary individuals (majority perspective). Integrating these different aspects, we highlight the current gaps in the literature, make concrete suggestions for future research approaches, and emphasize the importance of interdis-ciplinary research on this multifaceted topic.
Article
Zusammenfassung Einleitung Der Bedarf an einem spezialisierten Beratungs- und Behandlungsangebot für Menschen mit Geschlechtsdysphorie nimmt in den letzten Jahren stetig zu. Kinder und Jugendliche mit Geschlechtsdysphorie suchen, oft gemeinsam mit ihren Eltern, vermehrt professionelle Hilfe. Die Eltern, deren Einstellungen und Haltungen für die kindliche Entwicklung meist eine zentrale Rolle spielen, sind gefordert, sich auf die Bedürfnisse und Wünsche ihrer Kinder mit Geschlechtsdysphorie einzustellen. Während das Wissen um die Bedeutung der Einbeziehung von Eltern auch in therapeutische Prozesse inzwischen weit verbreitet ist, fehlen in Bezug auf die Begleitung und Behandlung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Geschlechtsdysphorie Erfahrungen und Daten zu den elterlichen Perspektiven. Forschungsziele Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, die Perspektiven der Eltern von klinisch vorstelligen Jugendlichen mit Geschlechtsdysphorie, ihre möglichen Belastungen, Sorgen und Unterstützungswünsche in der Behandlung zu untersuchen. Methoden Die Daten wurden in einer Stichprobe von Eltern von 295 Jugendlichen mit Geschlechtsdysphorie erhoben, die sich zwischen September 2013 und Dezember 2019 in der Spezialsprechstunde für Geschlechtsidentität, sexuelle Identität, Geschlechtsdysphorie und Transgender im Kindes- und Jugendalter am Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (Hamburg GIS) vorstellten. Mithilfe von offenen, selbstkonstruierten Fragen wurden die Belastungen, Sorgen und Unterstützungswünsche dieser Eltern erfasst. Die schriftlichen Aussagen hierzu wurden anschließend qualitativ ausgewertet. Ergebnisse Die Hälfte der befragten Eltern fühlte sich belastet. Die Hauptgründe für die von den Eltern beschriebene Belastung waren in vielen Fällen das Unglücklichsein ihres Kindes sowie Gefühle der Hilflosigkeit und mangelndes Wissen zu den Themen Transgender/Geschlechtsdysphorie. Die Mehrheit der befragten Eltern machte sich Sorgen, vor allem um die psychische Entwicklung ihres Kindes und die Akzeptanz in der Gesellschaft. Für die Zukunft wünschten sich die befragten Eltern mehr psychiatrische und psychotherapeutische, aber auch somatische Unterstützung. Im Bereich der Versorgung wünschten sie sich eine Vereinfachung der Behandlung mit flächendeckenden Therapieangeboten und kürzeren Wartezeiten sowie eine Verbesserung der Behandlung mit mehr Therapeut*innen und besseren Behandlungsstandards. Schlussfolgerung Diese Studie verdeutlicht, dass Eltern von Jugendlichen mit Geschlechtsdysphorie viele Belastungen und Sorgen berichten, aber gleichzeitig auch konkrete Unterstützungswünsche äußern, die zu einer Verbesserung der Versorgung beitragen könnten. So werden unter anderem mehr spezialisierte Kliniker*innen, zentrale Informationsstellen sowie wohnortnahe Beratungs- und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten benötigt, um die Betreuung und Behandlung dieser Familien zu verbessern.
Article
Purpose Misgendering of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals in healthcare settings can lead to worsened mental and physical health outcomes and decreased utilisation of care. Few studies have investigated the factors that contribute to this phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to apply qualitative methods to explore sources of misgendering, its perceived impact, prevention strategies and clinician responses to accidentally misgendering a patient, as identified by TGNB patients and gender-affirming care clinicians. Methods Between April and June 2022, 20 semi-structured interviews were performed at an academic medical centre in Southern California. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling and included: (1) TGNB patients (n=8) recruited from an interdisciplinary gender-affirming urological practice and (2) gender-affirming care clinicians (n=12) recruited from a regional interdisciplinary Gender Health conference, three of whom identified as TGNB. Interviews were conducted in person or virtually using an open-ended topic guide, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis was performed by two independent study personnel who hand-coded the transcripts. Results Four overarching themes were identified: (1) misgendering originates from multiple sources, (2) misgendering discourages individual access to healthcare, creates community hesitation and its perceived impact is modified by setting and intentionality, (3) building a gender-affirming healthcare system requires integration of behaviour, policy and technology and (4) clinicians respond to accidental misgendering by acknowledging, apologising, advancing and acting. Conclusion Our data suggest that misgendering arises from both interpersonal communication and structural factors within healthcare systems, leading to perceived harm and diminished TGNB access to health services. Any potential solution to reduce this phenomenon will require a multifaceted approach integrating behavioural, technological and institutional policy strategies with system-level implementation efforts.
Article
Background Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations have high mental and behavioral health morbidity, yet few studies have explored inequities in TGD people at the intersection of multiple identities. Purpose This study sought to describe inequities in severe psychological distress and substance use by gender/sex, race, and socioeconomic status (SES) in TGD adults. Methods We conducted an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) with 25 443 TGD people in the 2015 US Transgender Survey, nested within 48 intersectional social strata defined by gender/sex, race/ethnicity, and SES. For each outcome, a multilevel intersectional logistic model was fit with the additive effects of gender/sex, race/ethnicity, and SES and adjusting for age, gender expression, and US region. Results Mean age was 31 years (SD = 13); 35% were transgender women, 30% transgender men, 7% nonbinary assigned-male-at-birth, 29% nonbinary assigned-female-at-birth; 18% BIPOC; and 34% SES below poverty. Stratum-specific predicted outcome probabilities ranged from: 26%-64% severe psychological distress, 21%-36% binge drinking, 19%-37% cannabis use, 7%-12% illicit drug use, and 16%-34% cigarette smoking. Highest probabilities of cannabis and illicit drug use were among transgender women below the poverty line identifying as Biracial/Multiracial (37% and 12%) and Black/African American (34% and 12%), respectively. Conclusion Findings highlight the nuance of privilege and oppression, heterogeneity in groups that may share one identity, and need for public health and equity efforts.
Article
Full-text available
In this article the author reviews research evidence on the prevalence of mental disorders in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (LGBs) and shows, using meta-analyses, that LGBs have a higher prevalence of mental disorders than heterosexuals. The author offers a conceptual framework for understanding this excess in prevalence of disorder in terms of minority stress— explaining that stigma, prejudice, and discrimination create a hostile and stressful social environment that causes mental health problems. The model describes stress processes, including the experience of prejudice events, expectations of rejection, hiding and concealing, internalized homophobia, and ameliorative coping processes. This conceptual framework is the basis for the review of research evidence, suggestions for future research directions, and exploration of public policy implications.
Article
Full-text available
This study was a phenomenological and feminist investigation of the resilience of transgender people of color who have experienced a wide range of traumatic life events (e.g., hate crimes, intimate partner violence, child sexual abuse). Eleven transgender people of color (6 African American, 3 Latino/a, 2 Multiracial) participated in semistructured interviews (60-90 minutes each) exploring their expression of resilience in response to traumatic life events. Findings included six major themes common among all participants: (a) pride in one’s gender and ethnic/racial identity, (b) recognizing and negotiating gender and racial/ethnic oppression, (c) navigating relationships with family, (d) accessing health care and financial resources, (e) connecting with an activist transgender community of color, and (f) cultivating spirituality and hope for the future. Specific clinical and advocacy implications for trauma work with this group are provided. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
This article presents empirical research findings from a subsample of 290 transgender participants in the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Survey (THIS) who reported whether or not they had experienced hostility or insensitivity related to their gender identity or expression during high school, termed in-school gender-based victimization (GBV). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of in-school GBV on rates of suicide attempts among transgender people. Of the 290 respondents, 44.8% reported they had experienced in-school GBV, and 28.5% reported a history of suicide attempt. Among those who had attempted, 32.5% reported having made one attempt, 28.6% reported a history of two attempts, and 39.0% reported having made three or more attempts. Participants who reported experiencing GBV were approximately four times more likely to have attempted suicide than those who did not. Among the subgroups of 147 trans women and 81 trans men, GBV was associated both with history of suicide attempt, and with a higher number of suicide attempts over the life span. Implications for policy and clinical interventions are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
These minutes are the official record of the actions of the Association taken during the year by both the Board of Directors (the Board) and the Council of Representatives (Council). The roll of representatives was called at each Council meeting, and more than a quorum answered to their names. Reference is made in these minutes to various reports, some of which will be published elsewhere. Copies of these reports were distributed to Council and are on file in the Central Office. As long as the supply lasts, extra copies of many of the reports are available from the Central Office. These minutes are arranged in topical rather than chronological order, and subheadings are used when appropriate. The main topical headings are I. Minutes of Meetings; II. Elections, Awards, Membership, and Human Resources; III. Ethics; IV. Board of Directors; V. Divisions and State, Provincial, and Territorial Psychological Associations; VI. Organization of the APA; VII. Publications and Communications; VIII. Convention Affairs; IX. Educational Affairs; X. Professional Affairs; XI. Scientific Affairs; XII. Public Interest; XIII. Ethnic Minority Affairs; XIV. International Affairs; XV. Central Office; and XVI. Financial Affairs. Changes to the language of the American Psychological Association (APA) Bylaws, Association Rules, or motions of the items are noted as follows throughout these proceedings: Bracketed material is to be deleted; underlined material is to be added. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Increasingly, transgender individuals and loved ones (partners, family, and friends) are seeking assistance from mental health professionals working in the community rather than in university or hospital-based gender identity clinics. Drawing on published literature specific to transgender mental health, interviews with expert clinicians, the authors' clinical experience, and three key guiding principles (a transgender-affirmative approach, client-centered care, and a commitment to harm reduction), we suggest protocols for the clinician providing mental health services in the community setting. Practice areas discussed include assessment and treatment of gender concerns, trans-specific mental health issues, and trans-specific elements in general counseling of transgender individuals and their loved ones.
Article
Full-text available
While recent research on transgender populations has demonstrated high rates of experiencing violence, there has been little research attention to the mental health implications of these experiences. This study utilized data collected from the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Survey (THIS) of transgender people (individuals who described their gender identity as different from their sex assigned at birth) collected from 2005–2006. Current study analyses were limited to two subgroups: trans women (n = 179) and trans men (n = 92). We hypothesized that, as in the general population, exposure to physical and sexual violence would be related to suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and substance abuse. Both trans women and trans men in this sample were at high risk for physical and sexual violence, as well as suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Logistic regression analyses indicated that among both trans women and trans men, those who had endured physical and/or sexual violence were significantly more likely than those who had not had such experiences to report a history of suicide attempt and multiple suicide attempts. In addition, among trans men, history of physical and sexual violence were each related to alcohol abuse. Among trans women, history of sexual violence was related to alcohol abuse and illicit substance use. Patterns of violence against transgender people were identified and are discussed, including frequent gender-related motivation for violence, low prevalence of reporting violence to police, and variety of perpetrators of violence. Clinical implications and recommendations are provided. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
A needs assessment of transgender people was conducted in Chicago in 2001 to assess their HIV risks, health and social service needs, and barriers to care. One hundred and eleven transgender individuals, 78 male-to-females (MTFs) and 33 female-to-males (FTMs), participated in the study. Fourteen percent of respondents reported being HIV-positive; they were all male-to-female and the majority was of color. Risk factors for HIV included unprotected sex and willingness to have high-risk sex in the future. Respondents experienced high levels of violence. Two-thirds of respondents had thought of attempting suicide. Respondents reported a high need for health and social services, particularly MTFs and people of color.
Book
At a time when lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals--often referred to under the umbrella acronym LGBT--are becoming more visible in society and more socially acknowledged, clinicians and researchers are faced with incomplete information about their health status. While LGBT populations often are combined as a single entity for research and advocacy purposes, each is a distinct population group with its own specific health needs. Furthermore, the experiences of LGBT individuals are not uniform and are shaped by factors of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographical location, and age, any of which can have an effect on health-related concerns and needs. The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People assesses the state of science on the health status of LGBT populations, identifies research gaps and opportunities, and outlines a research agenda for the National Institute of Health. The report examines the health status of these populations in three life stages: childhood and adolescence, early/middle adulthood, and later adulthood. At each life stage, the committee studied mental health, physical health, risks and protective factors, health services, and contextual influences. To advance understanding of the health needs of all LGBT individuals, the report finds that researchers need more data about the demographics of these populations, improved methods for collecting and analyzing data, and an increased participation of sexual and gender minorities in research. The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People is a valuable resource for policymakers, federal agencies including the National Institute of Health (NIH), LGBT advocacy groups, clinicians, and service providers. © 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Article
Two Philadelphia-based HIV service organizations and a local university collaborated on a study of health and social service needs of transgender people. Transgender people were the primary resource for the development of the needs assessment survey. In this article, the survey development process, including two discussion groups and two focus groups, are described. Findings on barriers to care, violence, perception of public safety and comfort, suicide and health and social service needs are presented. Total sample size was 81, with 49 male-to-female and 32 female-to-male transgender individuals. Most (68%) were African American. About half of the respondents had thought about attempting suicide. High levels of violence were reported, especially among male-to-females. Health and social service needs included job training/work, dental care, health care, legal services, transportation, education and housing.
Article
A needs assessment (N = 248) conducted in Washington, DC, revealed that trans-gendered people of color are at high risk for HIV/AIDS, substance abuse, suicide and violence/crime victimization. Overall HIV prevalence was 25%, with 32% in natal males (MTFs, i.e., male-to-females). Four predictors for HIV positive status were identified through logistic regression-male sex at birth, a history of substance abuse, sexual assault, and unemployment. Substance abuse was found in nearly half the sample (48%) but only half of those (51%) had sought treatment for it. Thirty-eight percent reported experiencing suicidal ideation, with 63% of those attributing it to their gender issues. Of those with suicidal ideation, nearly half (49%, or 16% of the entire sample), went on to make attempt(s) to kill themselves. Forty-three percent had been victims of violence or crime, including 13% who had been sexually assaulted.Knowledge of the Standards of Care of the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association was quite low (9%) and associated with white race, any higher education beyond high school, and access to sex reassignment surgery (SRS). Access to SRS, defined as obtaining vaginoplasties for natal males and chest surgeries for natal females, was just 4%. White race (versus all other races, p < .001) and female at birth (versus male, p < .01) were significantly associated with access to SRS.Use of hormones at some point during their lives was reported by 51% of participants. Thirty-five percent were currently taking hormones, with 72% acquiring their hormones from friends or on the street. Among natal males, 25% had injected silicone.Nineteen percent did not have their own living space, and employment, housing and job training were the most commonly-reported immediate needs of the sample. The results of this needs assessment provide evidence of an urgent need for increased medical and social services specific to transgendered people of color living in the District of Columbia.