A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Law and Human Behavior
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1990
Criminal Personality Profiling
An Outcome and Process Study*
Anthony J. Pinizzottot and Norman J. Finkelt
In this work we examine outcome and process differences in criminal personality profding among
groups of profilers, detectives, psychologists, and students, using closed police cases--one sex offense
and one homicide. Two major questions guide this research: (1) Are professional profilers more
accurate than nonprofilers in generating personality profiles and correctly identifying offender features
from crime scene details? and (2) Is the process that the profilers use qualitatively different from that
cff the nonprofilers? In the written profile task, the task that is most representative of what profilers
actually do, profilers write richer, more detailed, and more valid profiles than the nonprofilers for both
the sex offense case and homicide case. An analysis of correct responses concerning the known
offender for the sex offense case revealed that the profilers scored significantly better than the other
three groups in a variety of measures; similar results were not revealed for the homicide case. Pro-
fliers, however, do not appear to process this material in a way qualitatively different from any other
group.
Criminal personality profiling--formerly
the stock-in-trade of whodunit writers,
'whose fictional detectives transformed crime scene facts into a portrait of the
perpetrator--has itself been transformed in the last 20 years from fiction to fact.
As the use of criminal personality profiling increases, empirical questions con-
* This article is based in part on the doctoral dissertation of the first author. We gratefully acknowl-
edge the suggestions and comments of John Monahan, Bruce Sales, Daniel Robinson, Darlene
Howard, and James Lamiell. A special note of gratitude is given to those law enforcement agencies
and individuals who participated in this study but need to remain anonymous; without their partic-
ipation, this research could not have been completed. A note of thanks is given also to SSA Roger
Depue and SSA Roy Hazelwood of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for their valued assistance.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Anthony J. Pinizzotto, Department of Psychology, George-
town University, Washington, D.C., 20057.
t Georgetown University.
215
0147-7307/90/0600-0215506.00/0 9 1990 Plenum Publishing Corporation
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.