ArticlePDF Available

The Potential Benefits of Mindfulness Training in Early Childhood: A Developmental Social Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective

Wiley
Child Development Perspectives
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Early childhood is marked by substantial development in the self‐regulatory skills supporting school readiness and socioemotional competence. Evidence from developmental social cognitive neuroscience suggests that these skills develop as a function of changes in a dynamic interaction between more top‐down (controlled) regulatory processes and more bottom‐up (automatic) influences on behavior. Mindfulness training—using age‐appropriate activities to exercise children's reflection on their moment‐to‐moment experiences—may support the development of self‐regulation by targeting top‐down processes while lessening bottom‐up influences (such as anxiety, stress, curiosity) to create conditions conducive to reflection, both during problem solving and in more playful, exploratory ways.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Potential Benefits of Mindfulness Training in Early
Childhood: A Developmental Social Cognitive
Neuroscience Perspective
Philip David Zelazo and Kristen E. Lyons
University of Minnesota
ABSTRACT—Early childhood is marked by substantial devel-
opment in the self-regulatory skills supporting school readi-
ness and socioemotional competence. Evidence from
developmental social cognitive neuroscience suggests that
these skills develop as a function of changes in a dynamic
interaction between more top-down (controlled) regulatory
processes and more bottom-up (automatic) influences on
behavior. Mindfulness trainingusing age-appropriate
activities to exercise children’s reflection on their moment-
to-moment experiencesmay support the development of
self-regulation by targeting top-down processes while less-
ening bottom-up influences (such as anxiety, stress, curios-
ity) to create conditions conducive to reflection, both
during problem solving and in more playful, exploratory
ways.
KEYWORDS—mindfulness; self-regulation; executive func-
tion; bidirectional influences; intervention
Self-regulation refers generally to the self-control of thought,
action, and emotion. Interest in the development of self-regula-
tion is increasingly pervasive, in part because individual differ-
ences in self-regulation in childhood have been found to predict
important developmental outcomes, including math and reading
skills in preschool and early grades (e.g., Blair & Razza, 2007)
and Scholastic Aptitude Test scores in adolescence (e.g., Eigsti
et al., 2006). Moffit et al. (2011) found that self-regulation in
childhood even predicts physical health, substance dependence,
socioeconomic status, and the likelihood of a criminal conviction
at age 32, after controlling for social class of origin and IQ.
Research on self-regulation has yielded increasingly detailed
models of its more deliberate, top-down neurocognitive aspects
(e.g., chapters in Bunge & Wallis, 2008), often studied under
the rubric of executive function (EF). EF, which includes pro-
cesses such as cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, and work-
ing memory (Miyake et al., 2000), develops most rapidly during
the preschool years, together with the growth of neural networks
involving prefrontal cortex (PFC; Zelazo, Carlson, & Kesek,
2008).
Less is known about the impact of bottom-up influences like
stress, arousal, and anxiety on children’s ability to control their
behavior. Nevertheless, there are reasons to believe that changes
in bottom-up influences may also contribute to changes in self-
regulation during childhood (e.g., Spear, 2000). During puberty,
for example, changes in the nature and intensity of children’s
motivational drives increase the likelihood of risk taking, at
least under some circumstances (e.g., Steinberg, 2005).
Blair and Dennis’s (2010; see Blair & Urasche, 2011) optimal
balance model of self-regulation highlights bidirectional rela-
tions between arousal and EF, suggesting that automatically
elicited emotional reactions may either promote EF or over-
whelm it, depending on their intensity in relation to an individ-
ual’s fluctuating target (or allostatic set point) for these relations.
In many ways this framework harkens back to the seminal work
of Yerkes and Dodson (1908), who noted that performance on
difficult or complex tasks (such as measures of self-regulation)
is an inverted-U shaped function of physiological arousal. In
support of their model, Blair and Dennis review evidence that
temperamental characteristics (such as approach or withdrawal
We would like to thank the Baumann Foundation and the Mind
and Life Institute (via a Varela award to KEL) for their financial
support of this line of inquiry.
The special section on mindfulness was handled and reviewed by
Robert Roeser and Phil Zelazo. However, this paper was handled by
Nancy Eisenberg for its editorial review process.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
Philip David Zelazo, Institute of Child Development, University of
Minnesota, 51 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0345;
e-mail: zelazo@umn.edu.
©2012 The Authors
Child Development Perspectives ©2012 The Society for Research in Child Development
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00241.x
Volume 6, Number 2, 2012, Pages 154–160
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES
tendencies) are related to self-regulation in ways that are consis-
tent with a bidirectional influence.
Another model that includes a characterization of both
top-down and bottom-up influences on self-regulation is the
iterative reprocessing model (Cunningham & Zelazo, 2007,
2010; Zelazo & Cunningham, 2007). According to this model,
the iterative reprocessing of information via neural circuits that
coordinate hierarchically arranged regions of PFC (Bunge &
Zelazo, 2006; cf. Badre & D’Esposito, 2007; Botvinick, 2008;
Christoff & Gabrieli, 2000; O’Reilly, 2010) is essential for the
deliberate selection, activation (or deactivation), and mainte-
nance in working memory of relatively explicit goals that serve
to influence self-regulation in a top-down fashion. At another
level of analysis, the iterative reprocessing of information corre-
sponds to reflection on one’s subjective experiences and permits
one to consider those experiences consciously in light of addi-
tional aspects of the context in which they occurit puts one’s
experiences into perspective.
Top-down influences, however, continually interact with bot-
tom-up influences. Figure 1 identifies some of the brain regions
involved in the motivated, iterative reprocessing of information,
starting with rapid emotional (approachavoidance) responses
generated in the amygdala that are then fed into orbitofrontal cor-
tex, which furnishes simple approachavoidance (stimulus
reward) rules and is also involved in learning to reverse these
rules. If these simple rules fail to produce an adequate response,
the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) acts as a performance monitor
and signals the need for further, higher level reprocessing of
action-oriented rules in ventro-, dorso-, and rostrolateral regions
of the PFC. According to the model, lateral PFC-mediated repro-
cessing allows one to reprocesses relatively simple rules and
formulate increasingly higher order rules that control the applica-
tion of these simpler rules and engage other neural regions (such
as the insula) in a deliberate fashion. The top-down influence of
lateral PFC on behavior, however, is both occasioned and condi-
tioned by bottom-up input (e.g., from the amygdala), which may
facilitate or interfere with that influence (cf. Damasio, 1999).
With development, children are increasingly able to reflect on
their experiences, resulting in richer, more nuanced character-
izations of a situation, along with greater psychological distance
from what might otherwise be prepotent aspects of that situation
(cf. Trope & Liberman, 2010). This, in turn, facilitates cognitive
flexibility, working memory, inhibitory control, emotional reap-
praisal, theory of mind, and empathic concern for others. Mathe-
matical and computational models have captured aspects of this
approach, leading to testable developmental predictions that
have generated empirical support (e.g., Marcovitch & Zelazo,
2009; see Cunningham & Zelazo, 2010, for a review).
It is now clear that the neural networks underlying reflection are
shaped by experience and strengthened with repeated use (see
Stiles, 2008, for a review). In adults, interventions as short as
2 weeks have produced not only behavioral changes but also
functional and structural (white matter connectivity) changes in
the brain (e.g., Klingberg, 2010, for review). Moreover, a growing
body of laboratory research indicates that self-regulation is sur-
prisingly malleable during the preschool years, when behavioral
and neural plasticity may be particularly pronounced (see Dia-
mond & Lee, 2011, for a review). Curricula designed to foster the
development of self-regulation (including interventions targeting
EF, emotion regulation, and perspective taking) in disadvantaged
children have also yielded promising results (e.g., Bierman et al.,
2008).
Amygdala/
Striatum
Hypothalamus
Somato-Sensory
Cortex
(insula)
OFCp
ACC
DLPFC/
VLPFC
RLPFC
Sensory
Cortex
OFCa
Thalamus
Physiological
Response
Conflict Detection
Hedonic Tone
Context/Link to Actions
Foregrounding/
Backgrounding
Higher-order Organization
Stimulus Evaluation (in context)
Superior
Parietal
Cortex
Rule Storage
Figure 1. Top-down and bottom-up influences on self-regulation interact dynamically through the iterative reprocessing of information in hierarchically
arranged regions of prefrontal cortex.
Note. Based on Cunningham and Zelazo (2007).
Child Development Perspectives, Volume 6, Number 2, 2012, Pages 154–160
Early Childhood Mindfulness 155
From the perspective of the iterative reprocessing model and
consistent with the optimal balance model, an ideal intervention
for promoting the healthy development of self-regulation would
do two things: (a) exercise the top-down process of reflection
(along with underlying neural networks) and (b) modulate poten-
tial bottom-up influences on self-regulation such as anxiety,
arousal, and motivation, which likely interact with top-down
influences in complex ways to facilitate or hamper children’s
ability to recruit the relevant neural networks and engage in
top-down control. One category of intervention that does both is
based on the construct of mindfulness, well-known in clinical
psychology (e.g., Segal, Williams, & Teasdale, 2002) and the
emerging field of contemplative neuroscience (e.g., Lutz, Slagter,
Dunne, & Davidson, 2008), but perhaps less familiar to develop-
mental psychologists.
WHAT IS MINDFULNESS?
Mindfulness is a way of attending derived from Asian contem-
plative traditions. According to a classic Buddhist text from the
1st century CE, mindfulness involves reflecting on one’s experi-
ences on a moment-by-moment basis: “You should super-intend
your walking by thinking, ‘I am walking,’ your standing by
thinking, ‘I am standing,’ and so on; that is how you are asked
to apply mindfulness to all such activities” (Ashvaghosha, c. 1st
century). This practice has been secularized in the context of
clinical treatments and psychological research over the last
three decades (e.g., Kabat-Zinn, Lipworth, & Burney, 1985).
Contemporary researchers usually define mindfulness as
observing one’s ongoing experiences, including one’s experience
of what is happening internally (such as thoughts or emotions),
without evaluating or judging each experience (Brown & Ryan,
2003; Kabat-Zinn, 2003; Lutz, Dunne, & Davidson, 2007). The
subjective experience of mindfulness as measured in contempo-
rary research is well captured by the results of a factor analysis
of items from several different mindfulness questionnaires (Baer,
Hopkins, Krietemeyer, Smith, & Toney, 2006). Results revealed
five factors that may be taken as facets of mindfulness: (a)
observing one’s experiences, (b) describing them, (c) acting with
awareness, (d) nonjudging of inner experience, and (e) nonreac-
tivity to inner experience.
In terms of the iterative reprocessing model, being mindful
involves reflecting on the current object of attention (including
internal experiences such as thoughts or emotions) and the cur-
rent context clearly and objectively. Increased reflection results
in a sustained state of purposeful attention that stands in con-
trast to the fragmented automaticity associated with multitasking
(e.g., Ophir, Nass, & Wagner, 2009) and the mind andering that
occurs when one’s attention is captured by thoughts about the
future or the past (see Smallwood & Schooler, 2006). This state
of purposeful reflection facilitates self-regulation by promoting
top-down facets of control (such as sustained attention or cogni-
tive flexibility) and diminishing more bottom-up sources of inter-
ference (such as snap judgments, emotional reactivity, or
a chain reaction of distressing thoughts). Conceptualizing mind-
fulness in terms of the iterative reprocessing model yields spe-
cific predictions about the effects of mindfulness training on
behavior (including increased cognitive flexibility) and neural
function (such as increased ACC function and increased recruit-
ment of frontal regions, including lateral PFC and areas associ-
ated with interoceptive awareness, such as the insula and parts
of medial PFC; Craig, 2009).
In adults, it is possible to cultivate mindfulness through a vari-
ety of meditation-based attentional exercises, including those
constituting Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) train-
ing (Kabat-Zinn, 1982, 2003). The MBSR program has been
widely adopted in clinical settings as a supplemental treatment
for a variety of disorders, from chronic pain and cancer to anxiety
and depression, and a vast body of literature spanning nearly
30 years has documented the beneficial effects of mindfulness
training on physical and psychological health (for reviews, see
Baer, 2003; Grossman, Niemann, Schmidt, & Walach, 2004).
The typical MBSR program includes 8 weeks of group lessons
supplemented by daily individual practice at home. Attentional
exercises include body scans (sequentially attending to each part
of one’s body, starting with the tip of one’s toes to the top of one’s
head) and breath awareness activities (noticing the sensations in
one’s nose, throat, and chest as one breathes). One can practice
mindfulness during sitting meditations and a variety of other
activities like standing, walking, or eating to encourage the inte-
gration of mindfulness into daily life.
During MBSR training, individuals are instructed to focus
their attention on their moment-to-moment experiences (e.g.,
noticing the many sensations associated with breathing) and are
told that if their attention wanders (such as ruminating over an
interpersonal conflict), then they should bring it back to the cur-
rent moment. In this way, practitioners reflect on their subjective
experiences as they occur without triggering an automatic (and
more bottom-up) sequence of emotional reactions or evaluations
(Grossman et al., 2004; Kabat-Zinn, 1982).
Mindfulness exercises like those in MBSR are explicitly
designed to train the kind of sustained reprocessing of informa-
tion that is required for EF. That is, they exercise those atten-
tional and reflective processes that make it possible to go
beyond simply responding relatively automatically to the most
salient aspects of a situation (such as responding emotionally to
a thought and then ruminating on it). Instead, increased reflec-
tion provides individuals with the psychological distance to
identify other possible, and potentially more appropriate,
responses. In addition to exercising iterative reprocessing and
the neural circuits on which this reprocessing depends, however,
these exercises also encourage a nonjudgmental and nonreactive
attitude that may directly attenuate influences that interfere with
reflection (such as cortisol/stress; e.g., Pechtel & Pizzagalli,
2010; Sapolsky, 1996) and amplify influences that promote
it (such as dopamine/approach-oriented emotions such as
Child Development Perspectives, Volume 6, Number 2, 2012, Pages 154–160
156 Philip David Zelazo and Kristen E. Lyons
happiness and curiosity; e.g., Ashby, Isen, & Turken, 1999). On
the basis of the optimal balance model and the iterative repro-
cessing model, these changes should interact to foster improve-
ments in self-regulation.
Research with adults indicates that mindfulness training does
indeed improve performance on a variety of measuresof self-reg-
ulation (e.g., Baer, 2003; Chambers, Lo, & Allen, 2008; Heeren,
Van Broeck, & Philippot, 2009; Mind and Life Education
Research Network, 2012; Zeidan, Johnson, Diamond, David, &
Goolkasian, 2010; Zylowska et al., 2008) and that it is associ-
ated with greater activation in the PFC networks underlying self-
regulation (see Ho
¨lzel et al., 2011, for a review). For example, in
a randomized design, 7 weeks of mindfulness training lessened
the tendency for negativestimuli to interfere with a simple cogni-
tive task (with corresponding reductions in skin conductance
responses to those stimuli), as compared to an active control
group trained in relaxation meditation (Ortner, Kilner, & Zelazo,
2007). Following an 8-week MBSR course, participants showed
increased activation in right dorsolateral and ventrolateral PFC
when attending to present experiences (Farb et al., 2007). In
addition, there is evidence for greater PFC activation during
other tasks in individuals who are higher in mindfulness (Cre-
swell, Way, Eisenberger, & Lieberman, 2007) and in individuals
who have more experience with meditation (Ho
¨lzel et al., 2007).
ADAPTING MINDFULNESS PRACTICES FOR CHILDREN
AND ADOLESCENTS
Standard adult exercises have been adapted for use with chil-
dren and adolescents to create developmentally appropriate
ways to train the core aspects of mindfulness, including non-
judgmentally noticing one’s moment-to-moment experiences,
monitoring attention and redirecting attention when it has wan-
dered, and nonreactively observing one’s thoughts and feelings.
A recent surge of research has revealed that children and ado-
lescents readily engage in these activities and enjoy doing so
(Biegel, Brown, Shapiro, & Schubert, 2009; Broderick & Metz,
2009; Huppert & Johnson, 2010; Schonert-Reichl & Lawlor,
2010; see Burke, 2010, for a review).
As with adults, mindfulness training for children and adoles-
cents typically occurs in small-group sessions that include a vari-
ety of activities, such as body scans, breathing exercises, and
sitting meditations. To compensate for children’s limited self-reg-
ulation skills, the lessons and individual training activities are
shorter for younger participants: Adults may be able to attend to
their breathing for 45 min, but 5-year-olds may only manage for
3 min (Burke, 2010). Mindfulness practices may also involve
more movement-based activities like yoga stretches or rocking of
one’s body, because attempting to remain still for long periods
may be so difficult for young children that it interferes with mind-
ful reflection (e.g., Kaiser-Greenland, 2010).
Instructions are typically simplified, and teachers may use
props or concrete metaphors to help children understand the goals
of mindfulness exercises. For example, to help children under-
stand the notion of a body scan, a teacher may tell children that
he or she will use a hula-hoop as a scanner, just like the scanner
at the grocery store that shines a light on each item it passes. Once
children have practiced with the hula-hoop, the teacher may lead
a group exercise where children use an imaginary hula-hoop to
scan their bodies (e.g., Johnson et al., 2011).
Props may also help children focus on their breathing. For
example, a teacher may place a stuffed animal on a child’s
abdomen and instruct the child to rock it to sleep with gentle
breaths (Kaiser-Greenland, 2010). In addition, to foster chil-
dren’s mindful awareness of the sensation of touching, children
may be asked to manipulate a common object that they are
holding behind their back, and notice how the object feels (e.g.,
“What is the texture of the object? Is it smooth or rough?”).
Such exercises provide an opportunity to emphasize easily over-
looked aspects of their experience: If children touch the object
and tell the teacher what the object is (“It’s a key!”), the teacher
may redirect their attention (saying, “I don’t want you to tell me
what it isI just want you to notice how it feels to you”).
Asking children to focus their attention on their sensations may
lay the foundation for mindful awareness of more complex aspects
of their subjective experience, such as emotions or thoughts. For
example, children may be told that thoughts pass through the
mind like floats pass by in a parade; some of the floats (thoughts)
may grab their attention more than others, but just as they would
not jump onto a float at a parade, they can simply observe their
thoughts as they occur (Saltzman & Goldin, 2008).
Throughout all of these activities, teachers’ own behavior can
serve as an important model for children’s burgeoning mindful-
ness skills. In addition, parents, teachers, and caregivers may turn
many daily experiences into opportunities to promote mindful
awareness by prodding children to notice what is happening in the
current moment in a purposeful and nonreactive way. For exam-
ple, during meals, parents might challenge their children to reflect
on the food they are eating: “Is it hot or cold? Is it hard or soft?”
During a sad moment, parents might ask children: “Where do you
feel sad: in your eyes, in your throat, in your chest?” Before bed-
time, parents might ask children to take deep breaths and notice
how their body feels calmer after breathing slowly.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF MINDFULNESS TRAINING
From the perspective of the iterative reprocessing model, these
age-appropriate mindfulness training activities target both top-
down and bottom-up influences on self-regulation. That is, train-
ing attention to one’s moment-to-moment experiences exercises
top-down reflection. In addition, practice being nonjudgmental
produces calmness and well-being, as does focusing on the pres-
ent moment instead of, say, ruminating over a recollected source
of anxiety. Thus, at both the cognitive level (attention) and the
emotional level (evaluation), mindfulness training disrupts the
automatic elicitation of emotional responses, resulting in greater
Child Development Perspectives, Volume 6, Number 2, 2012, Pages 154–160
Early Childhood Mindfulness 157
calmness and emotional stability, which in turn may make it
easier to consider multiple aspects of a given situation as well
as multiple possible responses and reactions. Moreover, the
repeated pairing of activation in the PFC (mediating reflection)
and the limbic system (mediating emotional experience) in
response to an emotion-eliciting event should strengthen con-
nections between these neural regions, quite literally growing
the neural circuitry that will support emotion regulation across
the lifespan.
Although experimental research on bottom-up influences on
children’s self-regulation is limited, it does suggest that stress
interferes with children’s self-regulation (e.g., Gunnar & Herrera,
in press) and that positive stimuli may facilitate it (Qu & Zelazo,
2007), perhaps by inducing a mild positive mood and increasing
dopamine levels in the PFC (Ashby et al., 1999). Of course, strong
emotional reactions of any valence might be expected to interfere
with self-regulation (e.g., Sallquist et al., 2009), but findings like
these encourage additional research on the contributions of spe-
cific bottom-up processes to children’s self-regulation, and mind-
fulness training may be a valuable manipulation that allows
experimental research to pursue this question. Importantly, on the
iterative reprocessing account, mindfulness training would be pre-
dicted to be superior to relaxation training or cognitive training
alone by virtue of targeting both top-down and bottom-up influ-
ences on self-regulation.
Recent studies with children and adolescents have found that
mindfulness training improves self-reported emotion regulation
in high school students (Broderick & Metz, 2009); teacher-
reported attention, concentration, and socioemotional compe-
tence in fourth to seventh graders (Schonert-Reichl & Lawlor,
2010); and parent- and teacher-reported self-control in elemen-
tary school-age students with low EF (Flook et al., 2010). In
addition, children’s self-reported mindful awareness is corre-
lated with their EF skills (Oberle et al., in press).
Research using self- or other-report measures is encouraging,
but it remains largely unknown whether mindfulness training in
children leads to improvements in behavioral measures of self-
regulation, and to date, there isnopublishedresearchonthe
effects of mindfulness training in preschoolers, when EF may be
most malleable. Preliminary findings from our laboratory (John-
son et al., 2011), however, indicate that compared to a circle-
time-as-usual control condition (i.e., a regular classroom activ-
ity), children randomly assigned to a brief mindfulness training
curriculum (administered in small groups in biweekly sessions
over the course of 5 weeks) showed improved sustained atten-
tion and perspective taking (assessed using Wellman & Lius,
2004, theory of mind battery; see also Bierman et al., 2008), but
not cognitive flexibility.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Emerging evidence bodes well for the possibility that age-appro-
priate mindfulness practices may be beneficial for children, with
concurrent as well as cascading benefits for academic and social
success. In particular, mindfulness training seems optimally
designed to foster the healthy development of self-regulation
because it targets top-down influences (such as the sustained,
iterative reprocessing of information) while simultaneously
addressing bottom-up influences (e.g., by reducing anxiety). This
is important because self-regulation is strongly predictive of
school readiness (e.g., Blair & Razza, 2007; McClelland et al.,
2007), presumably because it allows children better to adapt to
classroom demands, such as sitting still, sustaining both atten-
tion and motivation toward a task, and maintaining and manipu-
lating information during problem solving (Bierman et al.,
2008), and also because it allows children to learn in a more
active, reflective fashion, in contrast to the incremental drudgery
of skill acquisition (Marcovitch, Jacques, Boseovski, & Zelazo,
2008).
Clearly, however, more research is needed to demonstrate the
efficacy of mindfulness interventions with children in a rigorous
fashion: with random assignment of both trainers and trainees,
active control conditions, efforts to equate both student and
teacher expectancy effects, and validated behavioral (vs. self- or
other-report) measures administered by researchers who are
blind to experimental condition. Future research should also
investigate issues concerning the feasibility of integrating mind-
fulness training activities into routine school-day activities, and
assess the degree of fidelity and dosage that is required for
mindfulness training to be effective, the influence of classroom
and school factors on efficacy, and the duration of any observed
effects. Such research has the potential not only to provide
important knowledge that may be used in applied settings, but
also to provide insight into the causal mechanisms underlying
major age-related changes in self-regulation.
REFERENCES
Ashby,F.G.,Isen,A.M.,&Turken,A.U.(1999).Aneuropsychological
theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychologi-
cal Review,106,529550.
Badre, D., & D’Esposito, M. (2007). Functional magnetic resonance
imaging evidence for a hierarchical organization of the prefrontal
cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,19,20822099.
Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A
conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and
Practice,10,125143.
Baer, R. A., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., Smith, G. T., & Toney,
L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets
of mindfulness. Assessment,13(1), 2745.
Biegel, G. M., Brown, K. W., Shapiro, S. L., & Schubert, C. M. (2009).
Mindfulness-based stress reduction for the treatment of adolescent
psychiatric outpatients: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of
Counseling and Clinical Psychology,77,855866.
Bierman,K.L.,Domitrovich,C.E.,Nix,R.L.,Gest,S.D.,Welsh,
J. A., Greenberg, M. T., et al. (2008). Promoting academic and
social-emotional school readiness: The head start REDI program.
Child Development,79,18021817.
Child Development Perspectives, Volume 6, Number 2, 2012, Pages 154–160
158 Philip David Zelazo and Kristen E. Lyons
Blair, C., & Dennis, T. (2010). An optimal balance: Emotion-cognition
integration in context. In S. Calkins & M. Bell (Eds.), Child devel-
opment at the intersection of cognition and emotion (pp. 1736).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive
function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and
literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development,78,647
663.
Blair, C., & Urasche, A. (2011). A bidirectional model of executive func-
tions and self regulation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumiester (Eds.),
Handbook of self-regulation (2nd ed., pp. 300320). New York:
Guilford.
Botvinick, M. M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal
function. Trends in Cognitive Science,12,201208.
Broderick, P. C., & Metz, S. (2009). Learning to BREATHE: A pilot trial
of a mindfulness curriculum for adolescents. Advances in School
Mental Health Promotion,2,3546.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present:
Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology,84,822848.
Bunge, S. A., & Wallis, J. D., Eds. (2008). The neuroscience of rule-
guided behavior. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Bunge, S. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). A brain-based account of the
development of rule use in childhood. Current Directions in Psycho-
logical Science,15,118121.
Burke, C. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and
adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emer-
gent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies,19,133144.
Chambers, R., Lo, B. C. Y., & Allen, N. B. (2008). The impact of inten-
sive mindfulness training on attentional control, cognitive style,
and affect. Cognitive Therapy and Research,32,303322.
Christoff, K., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). The frontopolar cortex and human
cognition: Evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization
within the human prefrontal cortex. Psychobiology,28,168186.
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feelnow? The anterior insula and
human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,10(1), 5970.
Creswell, J. D., Way, B. M., Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D.
(2007). Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect
labeling. Psychosomatic Medicine,69,560565.
Cunningham, W. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations:
A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,11,97104.
Cunningham, W. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2010). The development of itera-
tive reprocessing: Implications for affect and its regulation. In P. D.
Zelazo, M. Chandler, & E. A. Crone (Eds.), Developmental social
cognitive neuroscience (pp. 8198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens.NewYork:
Harcourt.
Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive
function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science,333,
959964.
Eigsti, I. M., Zayas, V., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., Ayduk, O., Dadlani,
M., et al. (2006). Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late
adolescence and young adulthood. Psychological Science,17,478
484.
Farb, N. A. S., Segal, Z. V., Mayberg, H., Bean, J., McKeon, D., Fatima,
Z.,&Anderson,A.K.(2007).Attending to the present: Mindful-
ness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,2,313322.
Flook, L., Smalley, S. L., Kitil, M. J., Galla, B. M., Kaiser-Greenland, S.,
Locke, J., et al. (2010). Effects of mindful awareness practices on
executive functions in elementary school children. Journal of
Applied School Psychology,26,7095.
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindful-
ness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research,57,3543.
Gunnar, M. R., & Herrera, A. M. (in press). The development of stress
reactivity: A neurobiological perspective. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), The
Oxford handbook of developmental psychology.NewYork:Oxford
University Press.
Heeren, A., Van Broeck, N., & Philippot, P. (2009). The effects of mind-
fulness on executive processes and autobiographical memory speci-
ficity. Behaviour Research and Therapy,47,403409.
Ho
¨lzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D.
R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work?
Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural
perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science,6,537559.
Ho
¨lzel, B. K., Ott, U., Hackl, A., Wolf, K., Stark, R., & Vaitl, D. (2007).
Differential engagement of anterior cingulate and adjacent medial
frontal cortex in adept meditators and nonmeditators. Neuroscience
Letters,421,1621.
Huppert, F. A., & Johnson, D. M. (2010). A controlled trial of mindful-
ness training in schools: The importance of practice for an impact
on well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology,5,264274.
Johnson, A. E., Forston, J. L., Gunnar, M. R., & Zelazo, P. D. (2011). A
randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation training in
preschool children. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the
Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, QC.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An out-patient program in behavioral medicine
for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness med-
itation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General
Hospital Psychiatry,4,3347.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past,
present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice,10,
144156.
Kabat-Zinn, J., Lipworth, L., & Burney, R. (1985). The clinical use of
mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain.
Journal of Behavioral Medicine,8,63190.
Kaiser-Greenland, S. (2010). The mindful child.NewYork:FreePress.
Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends
in Cognitive Sciences,14,317324.
Lutz, A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2007). Meditation and the neu-
roscience of consciousness: An introduction. In P. D. Zelazo,
M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of
consciousness (pp. 499551). New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Lutz,A.,Slagter,H.A.,Dunne,J.D.,&Davidson,R.J.(2008).Atten-
tion regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,12,163169.
Marcovitch, S., Jacques, S., Boseovski,J.J.,&Zelazo,P.D.(2008).
Self-reflection and the cognitive control of behavior: Implications
for learning. Mind, Brain, and Education,2,136141.
Marcovitch,S.,&Zelazo,P.D.(2009). A hierarchical competing sys-
tems model of the emergence and early development of executive
function (Target article with commentaries). Developmental Science,
12,118.
McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L.,
Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2007). Links between behavioral
Child Development Perspectives, Volume 6, Number 2, 2012, Pages 154–160
Early Childhood Mindfulness 159
regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary, and math skills.
Developmental Psychology,43, 947959.
Mind and Life Education Research Network. (2012). Contemplative
practices and mental training: Prospects for American education.
Child Development Perspectives,6,146153.
Miyake,A.,Friedman,N.P.,Emerson,M.J.,Witzki,A.H.,Howerter,
A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive
functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A
latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology,41,49100.
Moffit, T. E., Arsenault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J.,
Harrington, H., et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control
predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,108,
26932698. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108
Oberle,E.,Schonert-Reichl,K.,Lawlor,M.S.,&Thompson,K.C.(in
press). Mindfulness and inhibitory control in early adolescence.
Journal of Early Adolescence, doi:10.1177/0272431611403741
Ophir,E.,Nass,C.,&Wagner,A.D.(2009).Cognitivecontrolinmedia
multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America,106, 1558315587.
O’Reilly, R. C. (2010). The what and how of prefrontal cortical organiza-
tion. Trends in Neurosciences,33,355361.
Ortner,C.N.M.,Kilner,S.J.,&Zelazo,P.D.(2007).Mindfulnessmed-
itation and reduced emotional interference on a cognitive task.
Motivation and Emotion,31,271283.
Pechtel, P., & Pizzagalli, D. (2010). Effects of early life stress on cogni-
tive and affective function: An intergrated review of human litera-
ture. Psychopharmacology (Berl),214,13.
Qu, L., & Zelazo, P. D. (2007). The facilitative effect of positive stimuli
on 3-year-olds’ flexible rule use. Cognitive Development,22,456
473.
Sallquist, J. V., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Reiser, M., Hofer,
C., Zhou, Q., et al. (2009). Positive and negative emotionality:
Trajectories across six years and relations with social competence.
Emotion,9,1528.
Saltzman, A., & Goldin, P. (2008). Mindfulness based stress reduc-
tion for school-age children. In S. C. Hayes & L. A. Greco
(Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness interventions for children ado-
lescents and families (pp. 139161). Oakland, CA: Context
Press/New Harbinger.
Sapolsky, R. M. (1996). Why stress is bad for your brain. Science,273,
749750.
Schonert-Reichl,K.A.,&Lawlor,M.S.(2010).Theeffectsofamindful-
ness-based education program on pre- and early adolescents
well-being and social and emotional competence. Mindfulness,1,
137151.
Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-
based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing
relapse. New York: Guilford.
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychologi-
cal Bulletin,132,946958.
Spear, L. R. (2000). The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral
manifestations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,254,417
463.
Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adoles-
cence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9,6974.
Stiles,J.(2008).The fundamentals of brain development: Integrating
nature and nurture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal level theory of psychologi-
cal distance. Psychological Review,117,440463.
Wellman,H.M.,&Liu,D.(2004).Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks.
Child Development,75,523541.
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimu-
lus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology
&Psychology,18,459482.
Zeidan,F.,Johnson,S.K.,Diamond,B.J.,David,Z.,&Goolkasian,
P. (2010). Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: Evidence of
brief mental training. Consciousness and Cognition,19,597605.
Zelazo, P. D., Carlson, S. M., & Kesek, A. (2008). Development of exec-
utive function in childhood. In C. A. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.),
Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.,
pp. 553574).Cambridge,MA:MITPress.
Zelazo, P. D., & Cunningham, W. (2007). Executive function: Mecha-
nisms underlying emotion regulation. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook
of emotion regulation (pp. 135158). New York: Guilford.
Zylowska,L.,Ackerman,D.L.,Yang,M.H.,Futrell,J.L.,Horton,
N. L., Hale, T. S., et al. (2008). Mindfulness meditation training in
adults and adolescents with ADHD: A feasibility study. Journal of
Attention Disorders,11,737746.
Child Development Perspectives, Volume 6, Number 2, 2012, Pages 154–160
160 Philip David Zelazo and Kristen E. Lyons
... cademic self-regulation, defined as a student's ability to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning behaviors, is essential for achieving academic success (Enayati Shabkolai et al., 2023). Self-regulation has gained attention due to its significant role in enabling students to manage their own learning processes effectively, leading to better academic outcomes (Zelazo & Lyons, 2012). Recent studies have explored how cognitive and emotional skills such as mindfulness and working memory may contribute to academic self-regulation, thus impacting academic performance. ...
... One potential mechanism is the enhancement of academic self-regulation through mindfulness and working memory training. Academic self-regulation refers to a student's ability to effectively manage their learning by setting goals, monitoring progress, and adjusting strategies as needed (Zelazo & Lyons, 2012). Both mindfulness and working memory training are believed to foster self-regulatory behaviors by promoting sustained attention, reducing mindwandering, and enhancing emotional control (Gearin et al., 2018). ...
... The relationship between mindfulness, working memory, and academic self-regulation may also be influenced by other factors, such as age, grade level, and socio-economic status. For example, studies have shown that younger students may benefit more from mindfulness training due to their developing executive functions and emotional regulation skills (Zelazo & Lyons, 2012). Conversely, older students may benefit more from working memory training, as their cognitive capacities are more developed, allowing them to better manage complex academic tasks (Nesbitt et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mindfulness training and working memory on academic self-regulation in female secondary school students in Bojnord. Methods and Materials: This research was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population included all female secondary school students in the first stage (grades 7-9) in the academic year 2022-2023, with a total of 2000 students. From this population, using convenience sampling, 45 students who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly assigned into two experimental groups of 15 students and one control group of 15 students. First, all three groups were assessed using the Connell and Ryan (1987) Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A). Subsequently, mindfulness training and working memory training were conducted for the first and second experimental groups, respectively. The control group did not receive any intervention and was placed on a waiting list. After completing the intervention, all three groups were re-assessed in a post-test and a follow-up test conducted one month later. The collected data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with SPSS-21 software. Findings: The research findings showed no significant difference in the effectiveness of mindfulness training and working memory training on academic self-regulation in female secondary school students (P>0.05). However, both mindfulness training and working memory training individually were effective in improving academic self-regulation in the students (P<0.05). Conclusion: The results suggest that both mindfulness training and working memory training are effective in reducing academic self-regulation in female students, with no significant difference in the level of effectiveness between the two interventions.
... Otra implicación relevante es la inclusión de actividades que fomenten el autocontrol emocional y la autorregulación cognitiva, habilidades que inciden directamente en el rendimiento matemático al permitir al estudiante gestionar la frustración, mantener el foco atencional y aplicar estrategias adecuadas frente a los desafíos. Programas escolares que integren rutinas de mindfulness, dinámicas de metacognición o resolución colaborativa de problemas pueden ser especialmente beneficiosos en este sentido (Zelazo & Lyons, 2012). Asimismo, la propuesta destaca la importancia de un ambiente de aula positivo y estimulante, donde el error sea parte del aprendizaje y no motivo de penalización. ...
Article
Full-text available
Este estudio teórico analiza el papel de la memoria de trabajo en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas en la educación primaria, desde una perspectiva neuroeducativa. A través de un enfoque cualitativo y un análisis conceptual, se revisa literatura científica reciente que evidencia cómo la memoria de trabajo, como componente central de las funciones ejecutivas, desempeña un rol clave en procesos como el razonamiento lógico, la atención sostenida, la inhibición de impulsos y la planificación, todos fundamentales para la resolución de problemas matemáticos. Se identifican las principales dificultades que enfrentan los estudiantes con baja capacidad de memoria de trabajo, tales como la pérdida de información durante el procesamiento, la dificultad para realizar múltiples pasos y el uso de estrategias ineficientes. Además, se presentan estrategias pedagógicas basadas en la neuroeducación que pueden potenciar esta capacidad cognitiva, incluyendo la segmentación de tareas, el uso de apoyos visuales y la enseñanza metacognitiva. El artículo concluye con recomendaciones para docentes y plantea líneas futuras de investigación, subrayando la necesidad de diseñar intervenciones basadas en la evidencia. Integrar los aportes de la neuroeducación en el aula puede contribuir a mejorar la equidad y la calidad del aprendizaje matemático en la infancia.
... Through the practice of mindfulness, individuals can disengage from ingrained behaviors and habits, and this can be especially advantageous when the behaviors and habits are unhealthy (Emerson et al., 2017). At school, the evidence suggests that the mindful trait not only produces gains in educators but also in younger populations, i.e. in students whose behavior tends towards indiscipline or violence (Zelazo & Lyons, 2012;Zenner et al., 2014). In this study, it was found that age is also a factor that makes a difference between educational professionals, since older professionals tend to have a greater capacity to act with awareness, perhaps as a result of their greater professional experience. ...
Article
Full-text available
The global cultural transition has generated profound changes in the way of life and social processes. Given cultural diversity, education professionals have faced numerous challenges to work and teach. In challenging learning environments , socio-emotional and mindfulness training can protect and strengthen the skills of educational agents. The goal is to explore and link the mindfulness practices and socio-emotional levels of Portuguese educational professionals. The Portuguese version of the SEC-Q and the FFMQ were applied to 221 education professionals who participated in the Hand in Hand program. Spearman correlation analyses were carried out between the dimensions and scores of both questionnaires, and comparisons were made with sociodemographic variables using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. The participants had a medium-high socio-emotional level (M=4.0; SD=0.37). On the other hand, more modest values were observed for the mindful trait (M=3.25; SD=0.46), with teachers showing difficulties in the dimensions of non-reaction and non-judgment. The FFMQ description dimension appears to be related to the SEC-Q self-concept (r=0.477; p<0.01), global socio-emotional development (r=0.427; p<0.01) and acting with awareness of the FFMQ (r=0,408; p<0,01), while the mindful dimensions of observing and acting with awareness appear to be related to the socio-emotional dimensions of not reacting (r=0.404; p<0.01) and not judging (r=0.436; p<0.01), respectively. The participants have positive socio-emotional levels. However, the data suggests that it is necessary to increase investment in the development of all the mindful dimensions, especially the dimensions of non-judgment and non-reaction.
... Mindfulness has been associated with improvements in these domains, as well as with reduced anxiety and enhanced socio-emotional skills. For instance, Zelazo and Lyons (2012) found that mindfulness training improved cognitive exibility and reduced emotional reactivity in young children. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This study examines the implementation of an eight-week mindfulness-based school program tailored for preschool children aged 60–72 months, and its effect on their self-regulation skills. Designed as a pre-test/post-test experimental study with a single group, the intervention was conducted in a public preschool in Istanbul, Turkey. The program employed a child-friendly narrative framework using a character named “Panda Mio” to introduce mindfulness practices. The Self-Regulation Skills Assessment Scale was used through both parent and teacher evaluations. Findings indicated statistically significant improvements in attention and working memory, although changes in inhibitory control were not significant. These results suggest that developmentally appropriate mindfulness interventions may enhance certain executive functions essential for self-regulation during early childhood. Implications for educational practice and future research are discussed.
... Therefore, according to Zelazo et al. (2018), there is a need to expand the reflection that childhood is an important period to promote interventions aimed at preventing psychopathologies and assisting in coping with various difficulties that are essential for academic performance. The development of self-regulation skills related to controlling thoughts, actions, and emotions during this phase of life is predictive of significant developmental outcomes (Lertladaluck et al., 2021;Zelazo et al., 2012). As noted by Ortiz and Sibinga (2017), well-structured Mindfulness interventions improve mental, behavioral, and physical outcomes in children, potentially benefiting both shortand long-term results and reducing poor health outcomes in adulthood. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective This study evaluated the effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on students’ social-emotional skills, as perceived by teachers, families, and students themselves. Method Twelve teachers, 50 family members, and 28 students aged 8-9 from two public schools participated in the study. They responded to a semi-structured interview, and the content was analyzed using the MAXQDA software, version 18.2.0 (https://www.maxqda.com), which generated a map with categories and subcategories of analysis. The central axis of the study was Perception of Mindfulness-Based Interventions. Results Results indicated that, according to participants’ perceptions, this strategy brought about significant changes in behavior, particularly related to self-regulation, social-emotional skills, and promotion of well-being. Conclusion Thus, we recommend that education managers establish norms and conditions for implementing such interventions to benefit elementary school students.
... Mindfulness-based programs delivered by teachers or other trained professionals are more effective for older students, particularly adolescents, compared to younger primary school students (Zoogman et al., 2015). Younger children (around 8-9 years old) have not yet fully developed the metacognitive and emotional regulation skills needed to effectively engage with mindfulness practices (Zelazo & Lyons, 2012). Compared to adolescents, younger children may struggle to grasp abstract mindfulness concepts and require more concrete, engaging, and interactive methods (Semple et al., 2010). ...
Article
The integration of digital technology in school-based mindfulness programs has gained attention as a potential means to enhance student well-being. This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of a digital mindfulness-based intervention implemented in a classroom setting. A total of 353 students (aged 8–10 years) from three randomly selected schools in Washington, U.S. participated in the study. The schools were assigned to one of three conditions: a structured, sequenced delivery of sessions (DMBI-Playlist, n= 208 students), an ad hoc implementation of sessions without a set order (DMBI-No Playlist, n= 101 students), and a waiting control group (n= 44 students). Results indicated no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in overall behavioral and emotional outcomes. However, students in the DMBI-Playlist condition demonstrated fewer conduct problems and more prosocial behaviors compared to those in the DMBI-No Playlist condition. Several study and intervention conditions that may have contributed to the DMBI's lack of impact are discussed, including sample sizes, teacher training, dosage, students' developmental readiness, and follow-up assessments. While digital interventions hold promise as scalable, accessible and cost-saving tools, further studies on their effectiveness are needed.
... Implementing programs designed to promote emotional regulation and cognitive development in institutionalized children could help mitigate some of the adverse effects of institutionalization. For instance, mindfulness-based interventions have been shown to effectively improve executive function and emotional regulation in children from vulnerable backgrounds [43,44]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background/Objectives: Emotional regulation and attention are markedly underdeveloped in institutionalized children (IC) relative to non-institutionalized children (NIC). Caregivers in temporary institutional settings tend to exhibit contingency-responsive behaviors with limited affective engagement, which may restrict optimal socio-emotional development. Despite the critical role that sleep routines play in child development, their association with emotional regulation and attention in the context of institutionalization remains insufficiently explored. The present study aimed to assess the impact of institutionalization on emotional regulation, attention, and sleep hygiene in childhood, as well as to investigate whether sleep mediates the relationship between emotional regulation and attention. Methods: A total of 110 children aged 7 to 11 years (N = 55 IC; N = 55 NIC) were assessed using the Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC), the Cancellation Test (Toulouse-Piéron), and the Children’s Chronotype Questionnaire. Results: Regression analyses and parametric tests revealed significant differences between IC and NIC groups. IC exhibited lower emotional regulation (β = 8.018, p < 0.05) and poorer attention (β = 3.818, p < 0.05) compared with NIC. Additionally, the MidSleep Point (MSP) was significantly different between groups, with NIC demonstrating shorter sleep periods (β = −1158.545, p < 0.05), contrary to expectations. Conclusions: These findings suggest that prolonged institutionalization impairs socio-emotional development, with downstream effects on cognitive functioning, particularly attention. While differences in sleep routines between IC and NIC were observed, sleep did not appear to directly mediate the relationship between emotional regulation and attention, nor did it present a primary risk factor compared with the broader developmental challenges associated with institutional care.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to explore the development and relationship between mindfulness and executive function (EF) in students in grades 4–5 and investigate mindfulness training’s impact on mindfulness and EF in grade 4 students in rural China. Study 1 measured mindfulness and EF in Chinese students in grades 4–5. Differences in the level of mindfulness among children in grade 4 (n = 159) and grade 5 (n = 187) in rural China were analyzed by multi-factor analysis of variance. Correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between mindfulness and EF in grade 4 (n = 103) and grade 5 (n = 124). Study 2 included 45 4th graders with a general mindfulness level, with 21 children in the experimental group receiving 12 mindfulness training lessons. The mindfulness and EF scores of individuals in the mindfulness and control groups were tested before and after the intervention. Study 1 showed that 4th graders had significantly lower mindfulness scores than 5th graders. EFs in grades 4–5 were significantly correlated with mindfulness. Study 2 revealed that mindfulness training significantly improved the experimental group’s mindfulness and working memory. A non-significant improvement in inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility was observed. There was a significant difference in mindfulness in grades 4 and 5 of Chinese rural upper-grade elementary school. Children who perform well in mindfulness also perform well in EFs. Mindfulness training improved the mindfulness and working memory of 4th graders in rural China with a general mindfulness level.
Article
Full-text available
Interest in applications of mindfulness-based approaches with adults has grown rapidly in recent times, and there is an expanding research base that suggests these are efficacious approaches to promoting psychological health and well-being. Interest has spread to applications of mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents, yet the research is still in its infancy. I aim to provide a preliminary review of the current research base of mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents, focusing on MBSR/MBCT models, which place the regular practice of mindfulness meditation at the core of the intervention. Overall, the current research base provides support for the feasibility of mindfulness-based interventions with children and adolescents, however there is no generalized empirical evidence of the efficacy of these interventions. For the field to advance, I suggest that research needs to shift away from feasibility studies towards large, well-designed studies with robust methodologies, and adopt standardized formats for interventions, allowing for replication and comparison studies, to develop a firm research evidence base. KeywordsMindfulness meditation-Children-Adolescents-Families-Schools
Article
Full-text available
Numerous brain lesion and functional neuroimaging studies have suggested that the dorsolateral and frontopolar prefrontal regions are involved in complex cognitive processes subserving thought and memory. However, previously proposed functional subdivisions of prefrontal function have concentrated predominantly on posterior prefrontal cortex, including the dorsolateral, ventral, and medial regions. Far less consideration has been given to characterizing the psychological processes mediated by the frontopolar cortex. Here we review published neuroimaging studies of reasoning and episodic memory, two domains in which the frontopolar cortex has been frequently activated. The results suggest that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is involved when externally generated information is being evaluated, whereas the frontopolar cortex becomes recruited when internally generated information needs to be evaluated. A hierarchical model of prefrontal function is proposed in which dorsolateral and frontopolar regions are serially recruited as a reasoning or memory task requires evaluation of internally generated information.
Book
A fundamental question facing neuroscience is how complex behavior is controlled. This book brings together a number of leading cognitive and systems neuroscientists focusing on this question. Presenting a wide range of methods and approaches, these researchers provide novel insights into the neuronal mechanisms that support rule-guided behavior.