Article

Rethinking America's Joint Force: Strength and Credibility in a Constrained Fiscal Environment

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

In today's constrained fiscal environment, we must “re-mission” a smaller, more interdependent Joint Force with an emphasis on capability rather than capacity. America's military is primarily intended to defend the nation from attack, prevent and deter war, and when required, to win decisively in operations ranging from low-end irregular warfare through high-end conventional warfare. In this century, our nation's economic strength, values, and credible influence will play as much a role in sustaining our security and prosperity as will military power. Working closely with other departments of the government as well as with partners and allies, the Department of Defense must rely on three key stakeholders—Congress, the service chiefs, and the combatant commanders—to shape a strong and adaptive military. Rather than focusing on traditional ends, ways, and means, this article addresses the “concept, form, and function” our Joint Force should pursue in support of the National Security Strategy.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... Information systems such as enterprise resource planning tools and cost accounting systems support the implementation of such efficiency initiatives (Goldman 2004;Levene 2013;Perry 2013). In turn, a more efficient and more agile organisation has a better perceived chance of "mission success" as it is able to channel more of its resources to the front lines when needed (Porter and Mykleby 2012). Improved mission "outputs" are in turn directly linked to the fulfilment of national defence and security objectives and credibility towards national and international stakeholders (Egnell 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
As the gap between strategic commitments and budgetary constraints continues to grow, defence organisations have introduced performance management initiatives to support decision-making and to improve governance. However, introducing managerial practices in public organisations, including defence, proves to be challenging. As performance management initiatives within defence suffer from an implementation gap, strategic benefits are not being harnessed. In our study, we first exploit the results of a systematic literature review to better anchor the encountered challenges within the literature. We then apply thematic analysis to a unique dataset from twelve NATO countries to propose a new defence-specific performance management framework for the strategic level. As the framework preserves the benefits of existing initiatives while mitigating most recorded challenges, it is proposed as a new guide for designing and assessing defence performance management efforts. Thereby, professionals and scholars are provided with a powerful instrument to address the implementation gap. Moreover, the theoretical and empirical lens adopted facilitates alignment between performance management initiatives, defence policy, defence strategy, and strategic objectives. Notably, policy goals and strategic “ends” are clearly connected to critical processes and resources. Thereby, the proposed framework better supports discussions with key defence stakeholders pertaining to the gap between commitments and constraints.
... Information systems such as enterprise resource planning tools and cost accounting systems support the implementation of such efficiency initiatives (Goldman 2004;Levene 2013;Perry 2013). In turn, a more efficient and more agile organisation has a better perceived chance of "mission success" as it is able to channel more of its resources to the front lines when needed (Porter and Mykleby 2012). Improved mission "outputs" are in turn directly linked to the fulfilment of national defence and security objectives and credibility towards national and international stakeholders (Egnell 2006). ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
In recent years, performance measurement and management systems have been introduced in a variety of public organisations to support strategic-level decision making. These endeavours have met with mixed success. The research documented here focuses on the performance measurement and management efforts of individual nations to guide strategic-level defence decision making. More particular guidance on measuring the performance of national capability-based planning processes can be found in the second report issued by this Research Task Group. The Research Task Group responsible for this report was approved by the NATO Research & Technology Board in 2011 and had its first meeting in February 2012. The participating members have been Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Latvia, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and ACT.
A National Strategic Narrative
  • . Y Mr
Mr. Y, ''A National Strategic Narrative,'' with preface by Anne-Marie Slaughter (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars, 2011).
Future Defense Manufacturing: DARPA's Adaptive Make Initiative Paul Eremenko, Program Manager, DARPA Tactical Technology Office; Lt. Col. Nathan Wiedenman, Program Manager, DARPA Tactical Technology Office; Barry Ives, Deputy Director, DARPA Tactical Technology Office
  • Ibid
Ibid. 7. ''Future Defense Manufacturing: DARPA's Adaptive Make Initiative,'' Paul Eremenko, Program Manager, DARPA Tactical Technology Office; Lt. Col. Nathan Wiedenman, Program Manager, DARPA Tactical Technology Office; Barry Ives, Deputy Director, DARPA Tactical Technology Office; Kaigham Gabriel, Deputy Director, DARPA; Regina Dugan, Director, DARPA. November 20, 2011.