Content uploaded by Flavia Ferrari
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Flavia Ferrari on Jul 31, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
BED BUGS AND BAT BUGS
DOI: 10.1564/23jun09 Outlooks on Pest Management – June 2012 125
© 2012 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
BED BUGS (CIMEX LECTULARIUS) AND BAT BUGS (SEVERAL CIMEX
SPECIES): A CONFUSING ISSUE
Jerome Goddard, Ph.D.1 Gerald T. Baker, Ph.D.1 Flavia G. Ferrari, D.V.M.2 and Claudenir Ferrari, B.S.3,
1Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University,
USA; 2Department of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, USA;
3Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, USA.
bristles at the sides of the pronotum, to make sure members of
these particular collections were within published size ranges
of the bugs (Usinger 1966). Then, specimens were processed
for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or hematoxylin and
eosin staining (H&E). For SEM, specimens were fixed in half-
strength Karnovsky’s fixative, dehydrated in a graded series of
ethanol, then air dried from HMDS. After mounting the spec-
imens on aluminum stubs with carbon tape, they were coated
with gold/palladium and then examined with a JEOL-JSM-
6500F at 5kV. H&E staining followed standard protocols
for insects (Ma et al. 2009), wherein 10µm sections were cut
with a microtome and transferred to a glass microscope slide
for staining and subsequent observation by light microscopy.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Scanning electron microscopy allows for easy and detailed
comparisons of bed and bat bugs. The bat bug, Cimex adjunc-
tus, may appear to the naked eye as a common bed bug, but
closer examination reveals otherwise. Bat bugs clearly have
longer bristles all over their body, a feature especially evident
on the pronotal margins (Figures 1–2). This one character-
istic can be ascertained by a pest management professional
using a magnifying glass or hand lens. The eyes of bed bugs
are more protruding than those of bat bugs. One way to
measure this is to compare the outer eye margin with the first
antennal segment (Fig. 3). In bed bugs, the eyes generally
exceed the length of the first antennal segment. The hind
femur of bat bugs is clearly wider than that of the bed bug
(Fig. 4). This too can be seen with a magnifying glass or hand
INTRODUCTION
Currently, bed bugs are one of the most pressing “vector”
issues in pest control and environmental health, with increas-
ing reports of the blood-sucking pest being reported in hotels,
apartments, and single-family dwellings (Gangloff-Kauff-
mann et al. 2006; Anderson & Leffler 2008; Goddard & de
Shazo 2008). Negative health effects from their bites include
emotional distress (anxiety, insomnia, and perhaps even Post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-like symptoms), nuisance
bites and their associated cutaneous reactions, anemia, and
potential disease transmission (Goddard & de Shazo 2008;
Goddard & de Shazo 2012). Although bed bugs have been
found naturally infected with a variety of disease agents, they
have not been conclusively proven to transmit these organ-
isms (Goddard & de Shazo 2009). Pest management profes-
sionals and environmental health specialists are on the front
line of the bed bug battle, often being asked to investigate
cases in private homes and apartments, as well as in public
places such as hotels, hospitals, and schools. Compound-
ing the issue is the fact that bat bugs may infest these places
as well, especially if there are bats roosting in them (Usinger
1966). Bat bugs such as Cimex pipistrelli (Europe), Cimex
pilosellus (western US), and Cimex adjunctus (entire east-
ern US) may sometimes bite people visiting or residing near
the nesting or roosting sites of these species (Krinsky 2002).
Treatment/eradication strategies for bat bugs differ from that
of bed bugs, and mainly involve solving the bat problem (not
lethally, but by exclusion). Although bat bugs may occasion-
ally bite humans, the bugs are not well-adapted to feeding
on people. Bat bugs appear macroscopically identical to bed
bugs, but closer examination can reveal differences. This
article compares and contrasts identification of the bed bug,
Cimex lectularius, and the commonly-encountered bat bug,
Cimex adjunctus, and provides comments on treatment and
control of each.
METHODS
For this study, ten bed bugs (6 males and 4 females) were
obtained from an apartment complex in Jackson, MS, and
ten bat bugs (7 males and 3 females) were obtained from a bat
infested residence near Southaven, MS. Bed and bat bugs were
identified using standard keys (Usinger 1966) and stored in
70% ethanol until analyzed. First, by light microscopy, over-
all size of the specimens were measured, along with other key
characters such as width of the hind femora and length of the Figure 1. Whole bug comparison of bat bug and bed bug, 22x.
126 Outlooks on Pest Management – June 2012
© 2012 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
BED BUGS AND BAT BUGS
lens. H&E staining (Fig. 5) of bed bugs and bat bugs revealed
internal musculature, gut, and reproductive tissues, although
no obvious differences, other than those already mentioned
(eyes protruding and wider hind femurs), were noted between
the species. Musculature of the cibarial pump, used to suck
blood, was especially visible upon H&E staining (Fig. 6).
CONCLUSIONS
Bed bugs will continue to be a problem for the foreseeable
future. Pest management professionals should take every
opportunity to learn about their habits and biology, as well as
that of related bugs, so as to advise the public about preven-
tion, management, and control better. As is the case with
many other pests, correct identification is critically important
in choosing treatment and control strategies. True bed bugs
require an aggressive approach using non-chemical methods
such as sealing cracks and crevices, mattress encasements,
heat (steam or dry), cold, and/or vacuuming, as well as chemi-
cal treatments such as dusts, contact or residual sprays and
(possibly) fumigation. Bat bug management in the US should
be focused on bat control, the reservoir host, with some resid-
ual chemical treatment to rid the area of any remaining bugs.
Bat control is primarily accomplished through batproofing,
i.e., sealing all entry and exit openings or other bat passage-
ways when the bats are out of the building at night. With
the exception of baby bats during early summer, the entire
bat population usually leaves a building within a few minutes
after dark, so batproofing should be done during that time.
Eliminating bats should lead to complete resolution of the bat
bug problem in a building.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Richard Kukinski and Amanda Lawrence of the Mississippi
State University Institute for Imaging and Analytical Technol-
ogy provided technical assistance with the scanning electron
microscopy. This article has been approved for publication
as Journal Article No. J-12017 of the Mississippi Agriculture
and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University.
References
Anderson, A. L., and K. Leffler. 2008. Bedbug infestations in the
news: a picture of an emerging public health problem in the
United States. J. Environ. Hlth. 70: 24-27.
Gangloff-Kauffmann, J., C. Hollingsworth, J. Hahn, L. Hansen,
B. Kard, and M. Waldvogel. 2006. Bed bugs in America: a
Figure 2. Close-up comparison of bat bug and bed bug bristle lengths,
45x.
Figure 3. Differences in eyes, bat bug (L) and bed bug (R), 45x.
Figure 4. Hind femora, bat bug (L) and bed bug (R), 60x.
Figure 5. H&E staining of internal structures of female bed
bug. Legend, arrows, left to right – partially-digested blood in gut;
musculature of legs; eye.
Figure 6. Cibarial pump region by SEM and cross-section by H&E
staining, arrows pointing to musculature.
BED BUGS AND BAT BUGS
Outlooks on Pest Management – June 2012 127
© 2012 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
pest management industry survey. Pest Control Technology
Magazine, November issue, 46-60.
Goddard, J., and R. D. de Shazo. 2008. Rapid rise in bed bug
populations: the need to include them in the differential diagnosis
of mysterious skin rashes. South. Med. J. 101: 854-855.
Goddard, J., and R. D. de Shazo. 2009. Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius)
and clinical consequences of their bites. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 301:
1358-1366.
Goddard, J., and R. D. de Shazo. 2012. Psychological effects of bed
bug attacks (Cimex lectularius L.). Am. J. Med. 125: 101-103.
Krinsky, W. L. 2002. True bugs, pp. 67-86. In G. Mullen and L.
Durden [eds.], Medical and Veterinary Entomology. Academic
Press, New York, USA.
Ma, H., Z.-G. Liu, Y. Bao, P.-Z. Ran, and N.-S. Zhong. 2009.
Morphology and three-dimensional reconstruction of the
digestive system of Periplaneta americana. J. Med. Entomol. 46:
165-168.
May, M. 2007. Bedbugs bounce back in all 50 states. The San
Francisco Chronicle, Sunday, April 8 issue, pp A1, A8.
Usinger, R. L. 1966. Monograph of Cimicidae. Entomological Society
of America, Thomas Say Foundation College Park, MD, USA.
Jerome Goddard is an Associate Extension Professor of Medical and Veterinary
Entomology, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and
Plant Pathology at Mississippi State University in Starkville, Mississippi. Prior
to coming to MSU, he was the State Medical Entomologist for the Missis-
sippi Department of Health for 20 years. His research focuses on the medical
and health effects of bed bugs and current work addresses the role of sali-
vary secretions in production of chemo/cytokines and subsequent skin lesion
development.
Gerald T. Baker is a Professor of Entomology in the Department of Biochemistry,
Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology at Mississippi State Univer-
sity in Starkville, Mississippi. His research focuses on insect, mite and spider
morphology in the area of the ultrastructure of cuticular sensilla, especially in
how the morphology, number and distribution of sensillae change during post-
embryonic development of a particular species.
Flavia Girao Ferrari is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Basic Sciences
in the College of Veterinary Medicine at Mississippi State University. Her
research interests lie in infectious diseases of human and other animals, partic-
ularly those that are vector-borne. Her doctoral research comprises a study
of spotted fever group rickettsiae in Gulf Coast ticks from Mississippi, genetic
variability analyses of tick and rickettsial populations, and a descriptive study of
a potential endosymbiont found in this tick species.
Claudenir Ferrari is a master’s student in the Department of Clinical Sciences in
the College of Veterinary Medicine at Mississippi State University. His research
interests lie in histopathology and for his master’s research, he studied an
asthma-like condition in horses as a model for human asthma using several
histopathological analyses.
Similar articles that appeared in Outlooks on Pest Management include – 2001 12(4) 159;
2007 18(2) 57
SUBSCRIBERS – REGISTER FOR FREE ONLINE ACCESS VIA INGENTA
Registering your institution is quick and easy; the whole process involves 4 simple steps and should take you no
more than 5 minutes. Please have ready the following information:
Contact details
• As administrator, your basic contact details
• Your library/institution’s name and address
Authentication
Access to IngentaConnect can be set up in two ways. You may choose one or both methods of authentication.
• IP address/range (users accessing from computers within an IP range dened by the site administrator) –
You may need to consult your network administrator for this information.
• User name and password.
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/register/institutional