Abstract In this paper our aim is to bring some,critical reflection to bear on the upsurge,of participatory rhetoric in local governance.,The research,we discuss investigates,two case studies of deliberative exercises,used,by local authorities to develop their Local Transport Plans, chosen as exemplars of authorities seen to be at the forefront of participatory transport planning. Our analysis avoids the rather simplistic ‘check list’ evaluative models,based,upon,the Habermasian,ideals of communicativerationality and instead develops,an approach,which attends,to the power,relations embedded,in the process of participation. Significantly,the research, across a range of stakeholder groups, reveals a deeply problematic relationship between citizen involvement and established,structures of democratic decision-making,- reflected in an emphasis,on (soft) relational outcomes,to the virtual exclusion,of (hard) policy impacts. We,draw attention to the institutional constraints which account,for the limited realisation of the participatory agenda,in local governance.,Conclusions,are developed,relating to both