Outcomes of Nonsurgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. .
Journal of endodontics (Impact Factor: 3.38). 08/2009; 35(7):930-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.023
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment with those of endodontic surgery to determine which modality offers more favorable outcomes.
The study began with targeted electronic searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, followed with exhaustive hand searching and citation mining for all articles reporting clinical and/or radiographic outcomes for at least a mean follow-up of 2 years for these procedures. Pooled and weighted success rates were determined from a meta-analysis of the data abstracted from the articles.
A significantly higher success rate was found for endodontic surgery at 2-4 years (77.8%) compared with nonsurgical retreatment for the same follow-up period (70.9%; P < .05). At 4-6 years, however, this relationship was reversed, with nonsurgical retreatment showing a higher success rate of 83.0% compared with 71.8% for endodontic surgery (P < .05). Insufficient numbers of articles were available to make comparisons after 6 years of follow-up period. Endodontic surgery studies showed a statistically significant decrease in success with each increasing follow-up interval (P < .05). The weighted success for 2-4 years was 77.8%, which declined at 4-6 years to 71.8% and further declined at 6+ years to 62.9% (P < .05). Conversely, the nonsurgical retreatment success rates demonstrated a statistically significant increase in weighted success from 2-4 years (70.9%) to 4-6 years (83.0%; P < .05).
On the basis of these results it appears that endodontic surgery offers more favorable initial success, but nonsurgical retreatment offers a more favorable long-term outcome.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert Handysides, Sep 02, 2014
    • "For longer observation times, there were no differences between the treatments [1]. In a systematic review published two years later, success rates for apicectomy of 77.8% for 2–4 years and 71.8% at 4–6 years were found [2]. In comparison, there was again no consistent tendency toward the superiority of surgical or non-surgical retreatment. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The outcome of apicoectomy in clinical reality is supposed to be different compared to outcomes reported from clinical trials. The objective of this study was to measure the outcome of apicoectomies under practice conditions by mining an insurance data base. This retrospective study was based on claims data of a major German national health insurance company (BARMER GEK). Through the company's data warehouse fee codes and treatment dates were accessible and allowed the tracing of clinical courses. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for the target event 'extraction' were conducted for all teeth that underwent apicoectomies within a 3 year period. Testing for differences among survival rates across groups was performed with the Log-Rank-test. A total of 93,797 teeth in 77,636 patients could be traced after apicoectomy. The cumulative 3-year survival rate was 81.6 %. Anterior teeth showed a significantly higher survival rate of 84.0 % compared to premolars (80.4 %) and molars (80.2 %). The survival rate in men (83.5 %) was significantly higher than in women (80.6 %). Analysis of survival by age revealed continuously declining survival rates with age (93.3 % for subjects under 18 years of age to 75.6 % for subjects over 84 years of age). The 3-year outcomes of apicoectomy were still acceptable for an intervention that is mostly conducted as a retreatment after failure of a preceding measure. However at a population level, the question remains to be answered whether other treatment options would potentially be more effective. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2015 · Journal of dentistry
  • Source
    • "Although endodontic surgery offers more favourable initial success, nonsurgical retreatment yields a more favourable long-term outcome in these failed cases [1]. A retreatment procedure in endodontic practice requires complete removal of the original root filling materials and enlarging and repreparing the root canal prior to refilling [1] [2]. Many techniques have been suggested for this purpose, including the use of rotary NiTi instruments [3] [4] and root canal filling-dissolving solvents [2] [5]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of three dissolving agents on the accuracy of an electronic apex locator- (EAL-) integrated endodontic handpiece during retreatment procedures were evaluated. The true lengths (TLs) of 56 extracted incisor teeth were determined visually. Twenty teeth were filled with gutta-percha and a resin-based sealer (group A), 20 with gutta-percha and a zinc oxide/eugenol-based sealer (group B), and 16 roots were used as the control group (group C). All roots were prepared to TL. Guttasolv, Resosolv, and Endosolv E were used as the dissolving solutions. Two evaluations of the handpiece were performed: the apical accuracy during the auto reverse function (ARL) and the apex locator function (EL) alone. The ARL function of the handpiece gave acceptable results. There were significant differences between the EL mode measurements and the TL (P < 0.05). In these comparisons, Tri Auto ZX EL mode measurements were significantly shorter than those of the TL.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2013 · The Scientific World Journal
    • "Despite the superior characteristics of MTA, its retrievability from the root canal has been regarded as one of its main disadvantages. Although initial root canal therapy has been shown to be a predictable procedure with a high degree of success, failures can occur after treatment.[4] Rotary and ultrasonic instruments alone have not been shown to be efficient in the removal of MTA from root canal.[5] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Organic acids have the potential to decrease the strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) during retreatment. However, this might cause alterations in dentin composition and structure. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of chemicals on surface microhardness of white MTA (WMTA) and dentin. White MTA-Angelus(®) was mixed and packed into tooth molds. Six experimental groups (n = 15) were formed and exposed to 2% carbonic acid, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 10% citric acid, 20% tartaric acid, and normal saline for 10 min and 20 min intervals on 1 and 21 days of setting, respectively. Vickers microhardness of WMTA and dentin for each specimen was measured before and after exposure. Data were subjected to repeated-analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. Carbonic acid was effective in significantly reducing the surface hardness of WMTA on both 1 and 21 days; followed by citric and tartaric acid (P < 0.05). Two percent chlorhexidine gluconate and NaOCl were effective on 1-day set WMTA. All chemicals, except 2% chlorhexidine, decreased microhardness of dentin significantly (P < 0.05) at 20 min interval. Cautious use of these chemicals not exceeding 10 min is mandatory to prevent significant alterations in mechanical properties of tooth during MTA retrieval.
    No preview · Article · May 2013 · Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Show more