Adult Asthma Disease Management: An Analysis of Studies, Approaches, Outcomes, and Methods

ArticleinRespiratory care 54(7):878-86 · August 2009with2 Reads
DOI: 10.4187/002013209793800385 · Source: PubMed
Abstract
Disease management has been implemented for patients with asthma in various ways. We describe the approaches to and components of adult asthma disease-management interventions, examine the outcomes evaluated, and assess the quality of published studies. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Cochrane databases for studies published in 1986 through 2008, on adult asthma management. With the studies that met our inclusion criteria, we examined the clinical, process, medication, economic, and patient-reported outcomes reported, and the study designs, provider collaboration during the studies, and statistical methods. Twenty-nine articles describing 27 studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. There was great variation in the content, extent of collaboration between physician and non-physician providers responsible for intervention delivery, and outcomes examined across the 27 studies. Because of limitations in the design of 22 of the 27 studies, the differences in outcomes assessed, and the lack of rigorous statistical adjustment, we could not draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of the asthma disease-management programs or which approach was most effective. Few well-designed studies with rigorous evaluations have been conducted to evaluate disease-management interventions for adults with asthma. Current evidence is insufficient to recommend any particular intervention.
    • "Seventeen of the nineteen reviews reported impact on utilization (Phillips et al., 2004; Langhorne et al., 2005; Gilbody, Bower & Whitty, 2006; Chiu & Newcomer, 2007; Smith & Newton, 2007; Brink-Huis, van Achterberg & Schoonhoven, 2008; Shepperd et al., 2008; Maciejewski, Chen & Au, 2009; Oeseburg et al., 2009; Steffen et al., 2009; Steuten et al., 2009; Pimouguet et al., 2010; Althaus et al., 2011; de Bruin et al., 2011; Simoens et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2012b; Tappenden et al., 2012). The majority focused on hospital utilization as measured by (re)admission rates, length of stay or number of admission days, and ED visits. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This new policy summary reviews the existing evidence on the economic impact of integrated care approaches. Whereas it is generally accepted that integrated care models have a positive effect on the quality of care, health outcomes and patient satisfaction, it is less clear how cost effective they are. As the evidence-base in this field is rather weak, the authors suggest that we may have to revisit our understanding of the concept and our expectations in terms of its assessment.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · Respiratory care
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Our nation is in the midst of an important debate on health care. The issues revolve around affordability, accessibility, quality and funding. Of these issues, the one that all experts agree must be resolved for the good of the country is the high cost of healthcare. Supported by years of testing and overwhelming empirical evidence by independent research, the MedEncentive Program has surfaced as a real breakthrough in resolving the issue of healthcare afforda- bility. This report presents the findings from five years of testing and the independent research that vali- dates the Program's efficacy and its underlining design principles. Background - From 1997 through 2007, a small group of innovators consisting of practicing physicians, a medical academician, a self-insured business owner, a medical practice management consultant, and a health insurance executive sought to find ways to align the interests of healthcare consumers, providers and insurers. After years of studying the issues, the group concluded that the single most pressing problem in healthcare was affordability. Understanding that the majority of healthcare costs are driven by people's poor health habits and medical provid- ers' variable practice patterns, the group focused on using incentives to align these stakeholders' interests to improve both health behaviors and practice patterns. This thought process led to the development of what would become a web-based incentive system called MedEncentive.
    Article · · Respiratory care
  • Full-text · Article · Aug 2009
Show more