ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The creation of an artwork requires motor activity. To what extent is art appreciation divorced from that activity and to what extent is it linked to it? That is the question which we set out to answer. We presented participants with pointillist-style paintings featuring discernible brushstrokes and asked them to rate their liking of each canvas when it was preceded by images priming a motor act either compatible or incompatible with the simulation of the artist's movements. We show that action priming, when congruent with the artist's painting style, enhanced aesthetic preference. These results support the hypothesis that involuntary covert painting simulation contributes to aesthetic appreciation during passive observation of artwork.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
published: 03 June 2014
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00391
Enhancing aesthetic appreciation by priming canvases with
actions that match the artist’s painting style
Luca F. Ticini 1,2,3,4,5,6*, Laura Rachman1,2,3,4 , Jerome Pelletier5and Stephanie Dubal 1,2,3,4
1Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, Social and Affective Neuroscience (SAN) Laboratory, Paris, France
2Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France
3Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France
4CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France
5Institut Jean Nicod, CNRS-EHESS-ENS UMR 8129, Paris, France
6The Italian Society for Neuroaesthetics ‘Semir Zeki’, Trieste, Italy
Edited by:
Silvio Ionta, University Hospital
Center (CHUV) and University of
Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland
Reviewed by:
Alissa Fourkas, National Institutes of
Health, USA
Luis Carlo Bulnes, Vrije Universiteit
Brussel, Belgium
*Correspondence:
Luca F. Ticini, School of
Psychological Sciences, The
University of Manchester, Zochonis
Building, Brunswick Street,
Manchester M13 9PL, UK
e-mail: luca.ticini@gmail.com
The creation of an artwork requires motor activity. To what extent is art appreciation
divorced from that activity and to what extent is it linked to it? That is the question
which we set out to answer. We presented participants with pointillist-style paintings
featuring discernible brushstrokes and asked them to rate their liking of each canvas when
it was preceded by images priming a motor act either compatible or incompatible with
the simulation of the artist’s movements. We show that action priming, when congruent
with the artist’s painting style, enhanced aesthetic preference. These results support the
hypothesis that involuntary covert painting simulation contributes to aesthetic appreciation
during passive observation of artwork.
Keywords: action, priming, simulation, aesthetic appreciation, art, mirror neurons
INTRODUCTION
Perceptual, cognitive, and affective evaluations contributes to
the aesthetic experience of a work of art (Cela-Conde et al.,
2004; Kawabata and Zeki, 2004; Vartanian and Goel, 2004).
Although much research has focused on reward-related brain
regions involved in artistic preference (above all the oribitofrontal
cortex; Jacobsen et al., 2006; Ishizu and Zeki, 2011, 2013;seealso
Ticini and Omigie, 2013), the role of other brain structures has
remained thus far poorly explored. Here, we investigate the con-
tribution of motor areas to aesthetic experience, a topic of very
wide interest (Freedberg and Gallese, 2007). Several neuroimag-
ing experiments have shown that the perception of artworks
elicits motor activity in the observers’ brain without fully clari-
fying its role in aesthetic experience (Kawabata and Zeki, 2004;
Cela-Conde et al., 2009; Cross et al., 2011; Ishizu and Zeki, 2011,
2013; Cross and Ticini, 2012; Umiltà et al., 2012; Sbriscia-Fioretti
et al., 2013). Indeed, on the one hand, motor activity may simply
be triggered by a covert approach or avoidance response related
to the emotional nature of the artwork, as it has been shown for
other types of stimuli (Hajcak et al., 2007). On the other, some
have hypothesized that it may represent the covert and involun-
tary simulation of the artist’s gestures when viewing a work of
art, signs of which may be present on the canvas in the form of
brushstrokes (Freedberg and Gallese, 2007). Whether the latter
interpretation is correct and whether motor activity contributes
to the aesthetic experience at all, is still unclear.
We recorded the preference of naïve individuals for 90 high
quality reproductions of pointillist-style paintings presented
under conditions specifically designed either to be compatible or
not with the actions required to produce them (as established
in associative training conducted beforehand, see Materials and
Methods). Each painting was preceded by a supraliminal prim-
ing consisting of a static image depicting a hand either holding
a paintbrush with a precision (Compatible) or a power grip
(Incompatible). A hand resting palm down on a table was used
as baseline (Control). We hypothesized that if action simulation
is causally involved in the affective response to art, subjects would
like the artwork in the Compatible condition more than in the
other two conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PARTICIPANTS
Twenty naïve healthy right-handed individuals (13 females;
mean =24 years) participated in the study. They were all naïve
to the purpose of the investigation and with normal or corrected-
to-normal vision.
STIMULI
Stimuli consisted of 90 high quality color images of pointillist-
style paintings (Ta bl e 1 ). Thirteen individuals (7 females; mean
age =27.9 years) who did not participate in the study pre-
selected them among 200 canvases according to their style:
pointillist-style, stroke-style, or otherwise. 90 images indi-
cated as pointillist-style paintings by at least 10 out of 13
subjects were chosen for the experiment. Furthermore, three
right gloved-hand images (holding a paintbrush with a power
or a precision grip, or rested palm down) were used in
the sensorimotor training (see Visuomotor Training) and as
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org June 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 391 |1
HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Ticini et al. Painting simulations affects aesthetic experience
Table 1 | List of the pointillist-style paintings used in the experiment.
Surname Name Title Surname Name Title
Marevna Signac Paul Pine Tree at Saint-Tropez
Cross Henri-Edmond A Venetian Canal Matisse Henri Le Cap Layet
Franco Angelo Blooming Tree Matisse Henri Luxe, Calme et Volupté
Ferrigno Andrea Divide and Conquer Matisse Henri Still Life
Franco Angelo Abstract Forest IV Matisse Henri Still Life with Purro II
Zeniuk Jerry Untitled Metzinger Jean Bathers, Two Nudes in an Exotic Landscape
Dellavallée Henri Farmyard Metzinger Jean Bord de Mer
Dellavallée Henri La Rue au Soleil à Port-Manech Metzinger Jean Femme Assise au Bouquet de Feuilage
Holton William Garden Metzinger Jean Le Château de Clisson
Holton William Attractor Metzinger Jean Nature Morte
Franco Angelo Forest Abstraction Metzinger Jean Paysage au Deux Cypres
Franco Angelo Forest Abstraction #6 Metzinger Jean Paysage Neo-Impressiste
Franco Angelo Forest of Love Metzinger Jean Matin au Parc Montsouris
Holton William Indra Metzinger Jean Parc Monceau
Franco Angelo Virginia Forest Abstraction 1 Klee Paul Croix et Colonnes
Franco Angelo Floral Abstraction Verdant Picabia Francis View of St. Tropez from the Citadel
Franco Angelo Manhattan Pidgeon Picasso Pablo Le Retour du Bapteme, d’apres le Nain
Franco Angelo November Bouquet Pissarro Camille Children on a Farm
Franco Angelo Nude Abstraction Signac Paul Palais des Papes Avignon
Franco Angelo Portrait of a Hill Franco Sean Bouquet in Ochre
Franco Angelo Rare Bird Segal Arthur Marseille
Angrand Charles In the Garden Seurat Georges The Maria—Honfleur
Angrand Charles Couple dans la Rue Signac Paul The Port of Saint-Tropez
Balla Giacomo Girl Running on a Balcony Signac Paul River’s Edge—the Seine at Herblay
Cross Henri-Edmond The Golden Isles Seurat Georges Port-en-Bessin—Avant-Port Marée Haute
Holton William Fallout Seurat Georges Port-en-Bessin—Entrance to the Harbor
Cross Henri-Edmond Sunset on the Lagoon Venice Signac Paul Les Andelys—the Riverbank
Signac Paul Saint-Tropez—the Storm Seurat Georges Gravelines Annonciade
Cross Henri-Edmond Undergrowth Lemmen Georges Factories on the Thames
Cross Henri-Edmond La Chaine des Maures Goldstein Leonard Going Home in Black and White #1
Cross Henri-Edmond The Scarab van Rysselberghe Théo Pointe Saint-Pierre at Saint-Tropez
Cross Henri-Edmond The Wood Goldstein Leonard Shield of Moie
Cross Henri-Edmond Cypresses at Cagnes Goldstein Leonard Flower Nebular #2
Dali Salvador Madrid, Architecture and Poplars Luce Maximilien The Seine at Herblay
Dali Salvador Dawn, Noon, Sunset and Dusk Luce Maximilien Montmartre—de la Rue Cortot, Vue vers Saint-Denis
Dali Salvador Bathers of Llane Luce Maximilien Morning Interior
Derain André Boats at Collioure van Rysselberghe Théo Sailboats and Estuary
Dubois Louis La Marne à l’Aube Malevich Kazimir Landscape
Biggi Gastone Apalachi van Dongen Kees Le Moulin de la Galette
Signac Paul Saint-Tropez—the Storm Marevna Flower Still Life
Biggi Gastone Odessa Chant Kusama Yayoi Sunlight
Signac Paul View of Saint-Tropez Lacombe Georges In the Forest
Vuillard Edouard My Grandmother Lemmen Georges Beach at Heist
Biggi Gastone Attraversamenti Lemmen Georges Heyst No.3 High Tide
Hofmann Hans Self Portrait Lemmen Georges View of the Thames
supraliminal priming images in the experiment (see Painting
Observation and Liking Rates). All images were adjusted to the
same size (470 ×351 pixels) using Adobe Photoshop and pre-
sented on a screen with a resolution of 1280 ×800 pixels, at
55 cm distance to subtend 12horizontal and 9vertical visual
angles.
VISUOMOTOR TRAINING
We first established an association between the participants’ own
movements and the creation of pointillist-style or stroke-style
paintings. To achieve this, we presented the participants with one
out of three right gloved-hand images (Figure 1A)displayedon
a screen (in random order, for 10s, 6 times each) that served as
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org June 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 391 |2
Ticini et al. Painting simulations affects aesthetic experience
instruction for the subjects to perform the desired training with
the right hand.
The image of the hand holding a paintbrush with a preci-
sion grip instructed the participants to paint dots by executing
stippling movements while holding the paintbrush with the pre-
cision grip (Figure 1B). The image depicting the hand holding a
paintbrush with a power grip instructed the participants to paint
strokes of about 10 cm by holding the paintbrush with a power
grip (Figure 1C). The image depicting the hand rested palm down
instructed the participants to position their hand palm down on
the table. Task completion was supervised by the experimenter.
The training was repeated before the first, third and sixth primed
blocks (see below) for each grip (10 s each) to strengthen the
visuomotor association.
PAINTING OBSERVATION AND LIKING RATES
After the visuomotor training, participants observed the 90
pointillist-style paintings preceded by one of the three images
(700–1000 ms, randomly presented) depicting a right gloved-
hand holding a paintbrush with a grip that supraliminally primed
actions (for studies investigating how hand images prime actions
see Borghi et al., 2007) that were either Compatible (preci-
sion grip) or Incompatible (power grip) with the drawing of
pointillist-style paintings (Figure 2A). A palm down image served
as Control. Each painting was presented three times, in nine
randomized blocks (of 30 trials each) preceded by a different
priming image. After 500 ms, the participants rated the paint-
ings by moving a dot along a 9-point Likert-type scale displayed
below the painting for 2500 ms (from “I like it very much to “I
do not like it at all, direction counterbalanced across subjects) by
left ring and index finger key-presses. Choices were confirmed by
FIGURE 1 | Visuomotor training. During the associative training, three
images (A) depicting a right gloved-hand holding a paintbrush with a
precision or a power grip (or rested palm down as control) instructed the
participants to produce pointillist-style (B), and stroke-style (C),
respectively.
middle finger key-presses. A 1000 ms blank screen completed each
trial. Due to the numerous unconfirmed ratings (10%) two par-
ticipants were excluded from further analysis. In the remaining
18, a total of 3.25% of unconfirmed ratings was excluded.
FAMILIARITY
Upon completion of the experiment, the participants were
debriefed to assess their familiarity with art by using an art
questionnaire adapted from Chatterjee et al. (2010) by exclud-
ing questions 1–3 due to differences between the France and
USA education systems. A median split (median of the Sums
=5.5) of the questions in Tabl e 2 separated the participants
into art-familiar and art-unfamiliar groups composed of nine
participants each.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
To asses whether covert painting simulation modulated the lik-
ing rating, we entered the ratings in a 3 (Condition: Compatible,
Incompatible, Control; within subjects) ×2 (Group: art-familiar,
art-unfamiliar; between subjects) ANOVA. A significance thresh-
old of p<0.05 was set for all statistical tests.
RESULTS
The main factor Group [F(1,16) =0.665, p=0.427, η2
p=0.040]
and the interaction Group ×Condition [F(2,32) =2.577, p=
0.092, η2
p=0.139] were not significant. In other words, this result
indicates that art familiarity did not influence the results. Instead,
the factor Condition was significant [F(2,32) =3.355, p=0.047,
η2
p=0.173]. In particular, the aesthetic preference expressed
for the paintings in the Compatible condition (4.974 ±0.181;
Mean ±s.e.m.) was significantly higher (p=0.048, Newman-
Keuls post-hoc test) than that in the Incompatible condition
(4.877 ±0.168), and marginally different (p=0.067) from that
in the Control condition (4.899 ±0.176; Figure 2B). Instead, the
liking rates did not differ between the Incompatible and Control
conditions (p=0.567).
Correlations between each condition and individuals’ sum of
experience ratings (see Tabl e 2) were not significant (Pearson cor-
relations rs <0.236, ps >0.346) thus ruling out any association
between familiarity and liking scores.
DISCUSSION
In this behavioral study we show that the aesthetic appreciation
for pointillist-style paintings is enhanced by presenting supral-
iminal action priming images that are congruent (Compatible
condition) with the style required to create those paintings. How
can the priming modulate liking ratings of passively observed
canvases? We believe that the congruent priming facilitated the
covert simulation of the brushstrokes present in the paintings,
thus yielding to higher ratings. This interpretation is consistent
with the hypothesis that motor structures have a role in aesthetic
and particularly that involuntary painting simulation contributes
to aesthetic appreciation (Freedberg and Gallese, 2007; Leder
et al., 2012; Umiltà et al., 2012). In agreement with previous work
(Umiltà et al., 2012), our results also suggest that this effect is
independent of familiarity with art. Nonetheless, since all partici-
pants were not actively engaged in creating artwork (see Question
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org June 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 391 |3
Ticini et al. Painting simulations affects aesthetic experience
FIGURE 2 | (A) Images of a gloved-hand holding a paintbrush were
used as supraliminal priming before the display of each pointillist-style
painting. The images consisted of either a precision or a power grip,
or of a rested palm down hand and they created three conditions.
Compatible (precision grip) or Incompatible (power grip) with the
drawing of pointillist-style paintings. The palm down image served as
Control.(B) The preference expressed when the paintings were
preceded by priming images activating motor programs Compatible
with the production of pointillist-style brushstrokes was higher than
that expressed for the Incompatible (p<0.05) and the Control
(marginally significant §p=0.067) conditions. The liking ratings in the
Incompatible and Control conditions did not differ from each other
(p=0.567). Mean liking ratings in the three conditions are depicted
(error bars represent s.e.m.).
3 in the Art familiarity questionnaire, Ta ble 2 ) we cannot rule out
the possibility that the results would be different for artists.
What is the mechanisms involved in simulating brushstrokes?
The concept of covert action simulation has acquired a new
interest with the work conducted on the mirror neuron mech-
anism in the non-human and human primate brain (Rizzolatti
and Sinigaglia, 2010). Through this mechanism, other agents’
actions are mirrored in one’s own motor system thus, it is
thought, helping to understand others’ motor acts from “within.
Action of other agents can be mirrored or covertly simulated
when they are directly observed as well as when they are repre-
sented as static pictures (i.e., images depicting body movements,
see Mado-Proverbio et al., 2009; Urgesi et al., 2010), and when
they are hidden from view and only their sound (Ticini et al.,
2012)ortheirtraces(Longcamp et al., 2003) are perceived.
For instance, there is evidence that observation of hand writ-
ten letters triggers activity in motor areas involved in writings
(Longcamp et al., 2003;seealsoTicini, 2013), and particularly
that learning to write facilitates the visual recognition of letters
through the participation of brain areas known to be activated
by the execution, imagery and observation of actions (Longcamp
et al., 2008). Our result is supported by these and more recent
behavioral findings reporting that the direction of observed
brushstrokes affects participants’ response speed in reaction time
experiments (Taylor et al., 2012) and that active execution of
movements increases (or decreases) the viewer’s liking ratings
when they match (or not) the style of the painting (Leder et al.,
2012).
These results could be also explained by alternative mecha-
nisms not necessarily involving painting simulation. For instance,
it is plausible that the implicit knowledge about the correct
action needed to manipulate the paintbrush (see Buxbaum and
Kalenine, 2010) may have facilitated the most functional and
effortless motor program to grasp a brush in order to cre-
ate pointillist-like paintings. This would be in accordance with
the idea that fluency in stimulus processing can influence aes-
thetic responses, as well (Reber et al., 2004). Moreover, unlike
in Leder et al. (2012), we cannot exclude that self-observation
of one own’s hands during the training may have strengthened
visuo-visual (instead of visuo-motor) associations between the
hand grip and the painting style. We also cannot exclude that
an intrinsic affective value of the action primes may have biased
the preference ratings (e.g., the precision grip could have been
perceived as more positive than the power grip). In this regard,
a recent article from Flexas et al. showed differences in liking
for abstract artwork when they were preceded by facial primes
showing happiness, disgust or no emotion (Flexas et al., 2013).
In particular, paintings preceded by happiness primes were liked
more than those preceded by disgust primes. If it were the case
in our experimental setup, our results would extend previous
research on how the affective transfer elicited by priming may
influence evaluative judgments (e.g., Murphy and Zajonc, 1993;
Rotteveel et al., 2001) to the domain of aesthetic experience.
Finally, we cannot exclude that the prior training alone could
be sufficient to enhance the ratings as a result of an exposure
effect, without the need of priming images presented before each
painting.
In conclusion, we here provide empirical evidence that,
beyond other factors such as upbringing, historical context and
nature of the artistic stimuli, covert painting simulation may
influence affective responses to art (Freedberg and Gallese, 2007).
Although we cannot fully rule out alternative explanations, we
suggest that the contribution of motor areas may be fundamental
for the attribution of the hedonic value to some objects of art.
Since simulation appears pivotal for understanding the actions
and emotions of others, one important area of future research
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org June 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 391 |4
Ticini et al. Painting simulations affects aesthetic experience
Table 2 | Art familiarity questionnaire.
Subject Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Sum Group
1 22001 5 1
2 44000 8 2
3 22000 4 1
4 22000 4 1
5 42000 6 2
6 44000 8 2
7 42002 8 2
8 5302212 2
9 54215 17 2
10 21001 4 1
11 20000 2 1
12 00000 0 1
13 20000 2 1
14 00000 0 1
15 44062 16 2
16 32012 8 2
17 21011 5 1
18 44011 10 2
Participants were divided into two Groups according to a questionnaire on art
familiarity. Group 1 (median of the Sum <5.5) and Group 2 (median of the
Sum >5.5) were composed of participants (nine in each group) with less or
more art familiarity, respectively. Questionnaire: Q1. On average, you visit art
museums about once every . . . (*); Q2. On average, you visit art galleries about
once every. . . (*); Q3. In the average week how many hours do you spend mak-
ing visual art? (range: “0” to “6 or above”); Q4. In the average week how many
hours do you spend reading a publication that is related to visual art? (range: “0”
to “6 or above”); Q5. In the average week how many hours do you spend each
week looking at visual art? *range for Q1 and Q2:“0” to “5. 0 (almost never),
1 (once a year), 2 (once every 6 months), 3 (once every 2 months), 4 (once a
month), 5 (once a week).
will be to characterize its influence on affective centers beyond
the domain of artistic preference. Obtaining a better understand-
ing of the contribution of action simulation in affective states is
likely to shed light not just on how the brain encodes affective
stimuli but also may enrich our perspective on the neural mech-
anisms involved in some social and communicative deficits asso-
ciated with action simulation, such as autism spectrum disorder
(Oberman and Ramachandran, 2007).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TheauthorswishtothankA.Berthoz,H.Leder,M.Nadal,andthe
reviewers for their insightful comments. This work was supported
by the French National Research Agency (ANR-10-CREA-005).
REFERENCES
Borghi, A. M., Bonfiglioli, C., Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., and Nicoletti, R.
(2007). Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with
hand primes. Neurosci. Le tt. 411, 17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.003
Buxbaum, L. J., and Kalenine, S. (2010). Action knowledge, visuomotor activation,
and embodiment in the two action systems. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1191, 201–218.
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05447.x
Cela-Conde, C. J., Ayala, F. J., Munar, E., Maestú, F., Nadal, M., Capó, M. A.,
et al. (2009). Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates
of beauty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 3847–3852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900
304106
Cela-Conde, C. J., Marty, G., Maestú, F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Fernández, A.,
et al. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic
perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 6321–6325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.
0401427101
Chatterjee, A., Widick, P., Sternschein, R., Smith, W. B., and Bromberger, B.
(2010). The assessment of art attributes. Empir. Stud. Arts 28, 207–222. doi:
10.2190/EM.28.2.f
Cross, E. S., Kirsch, L., Ticini, L. F., and Schuetz-Bosbach, S. (2011). The impact
of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Front. Hum.
Neuro sci. 5:102. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102
Cross, E. S., and Ticini, L. F. (2012). Neuroaesthetics and beyond: new horizons in
applying the science of the brain to the art of dance. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 11,
5–16. doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9190-y
Flexas, A., Rosselló, J., Christensen, J. F., Nadal, M., Olivera La Rosa, A.,
and Munar, E. (2013). Affective priming using facial expressions modu-
lates liking for abstract art. PLoS ONE 8:e80154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.
0080154
Freedberg, D., and Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in
esthetic experience. Tre nd s Cog n. S ci . 11, 197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.
02.003
Hajcak, G., Molnar, C., George, M. S., Bolger, K., Koola, J., and Nahas, Z. (2007).
Emotion facilitates action: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study of motor
cortex excitability during picture viewing. Psychophysiology 44, 91–97. doi:
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00487.x
Ishizu, T., and Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS ONE
6:e21852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021852
Ishizu, T., and Zeki, S. (2013). The brain’s specialized systems for aesthetic
and perceptual judgment. Eur. J. Neurosci. 37, 1413–1420. doi: 10.1111/ejn.
12135
Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R. I., Höfel, L., and Cramon, D. Y. V. (2006). Brain
correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroim age 29, 276–285. doi:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010
Kawabata, H., and Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. J. Neurophysiol. 91,
1699–1705. doi: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003
Leder, H., Bär, S., and Topolinski, S. (2012). Covert painting simulations influ-
ence aesthetic appreciation of artworks. Psychol. Sci. 23, 1479–1481. doi:
10.1177/0956797612452866
Longcamp, M., Anton, J.-L., Roth, M., and Velay, J.-L. (2003). Visual presentation
of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. Neuroimag e 19,
1492–1500. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00088-0
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J.-C., Anton, J.-L., Roth, M., Nazarian,
B., et al. (2008). Learning through hand- or typewriting influences
visual recognition of new graphic shapes: behavioral and functional imag-
ing evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 802–815. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.
20504
Mado-Proverbio, A. M., Riva, F., and Zani, A. (2009). Observation of static pictures
of dynamic actions enhances the activity of movement-related brain areas. PLoS
ONE 4:e5389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005389
Murphy, S. T., and Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective
priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J.Pers.Soc.Psychol.
64, 723–739. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
Oberman, L. M., and Ramachandran, V. S. (2007). The simulating social mind:
the role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and commu-
nicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychol. Bull. 133, 310–327. doi:
10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.310
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., and Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency
and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing expe-
rience? Pers.Soc.Psychol.Rev. 8, 364–382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957
pspr0804_3
Rizzolatti, G., and Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal
mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11,
264–274. doi: 10.1038/nrn2805
Rotteveel, M., de Groot, P., Geutskens, A., and Phaf, R. H. (2001). Stronger subop-
timal than optimal affective priming? Emotion 1, 348–364. doi: 10.1037/1528-
3542.1.4.348
Sbriscia-Fioretti, B., Berchio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., and Umiltà,
M. A. (2013). ERP Modulation during observation of abstract paint-
ings by Franz Kline. PLoS ONE 8:e75241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.
0075241
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org June 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 391 |5
Ticini et al. Painting simulations affects aesthetic experience
Taylor, J. E., Witt, J. K., and Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Uncovering the connec-
tion between artist and audience: viewing painted brushstrokes evokes cor-
responding action representations in the observer. Cognition 125, 26–36. doi:
10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.012
Ticini, L. F. (2013). Does the motor cortex differentiate between linguistic sym-
bols and scribbles? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:715. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.
00715
Ticini, L. F., and Omigie, D. (2013). Why do we like what we like? When informa-
tion flow matters. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:731. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00731
Ticini, L. F., Schuetz-Bosbach, S., Weiss, C., Casile, A., and Waszak, F. (2012).
When sounds become actions: higher-order representation of newly learned
action sounds in the human motor system. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 464–474. doi:
10.1162/jocn_a_00134
Umiltà, M. A., Berchio, C., Sestito, M., Freedberg, D., and Gallese, V. (2012).
Abstract art and cortical motor activation: an EEG study. Front. Hum. Neurosci.
6:311. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00311
Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., and Aglioti, S. M.
(2010). Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system.
Cereb. Cortex 20, 2511–2521. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp292
Vartanian, O., and Goel, V. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic
preference for paintings. Neuroreport 15, 893–897. doi: 10.1097/00001756-
200404090-00032
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was con-
ducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be
construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Received: 16 December 2013; accepted: 16 May 2014; published online: 03 June 2014.
Citation: Ticini LF, Rachman L, Pelletier J and Dubal S (2014) Enhancing aesthetic
appreciation by priming canvases with actions that match the artist’s painting style.
Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:391. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00391
This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
Copyright © 2014 Ticini, Rachman, Pelletier and Dubal. This is an open-access arti-
cle distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the
original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this
journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or
reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org June 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 391 |6
... However, in some adjacent fields we found some enlightening results. In the aesthetic models proposed in recent years, many works listed the motion sensation of handwritten lines as an important factor [13,23,49,53], and some experimental studies also confirmed that motion perception plays an important role in aesthetic judgment [6,22,34,44,48,50]. And as early as 1921 in a systematic study on the emotional perception of hand-drawn lines, Lundholm [33] proposed that the drawing process of lines may be related to the emotional expression. ...
... Through EEG, Umiltà et al. [50] and Sbriscia-Fioretti et al. [44] showed that the brain's motor system is actively involved in aesthetic behaviour when viewing Lucio Fontana's and Franz Kline's abstract paintings composed of unique brush strokes. Ticini et al. [48] found that consciously imitating the artist's actions when viewing artworks can enhance the aesthetic experience. Lyu et al. [34] proposed a method for measuring the subjective movement of brush strokes, illustrating that the motion features of hand-drawn lines significantly influence the viewer's judgement of artistic style. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
As a basic visual element, the way lines express and evoke human emotional responses is an important topic of interest in fields such as cognitive psychology and human-computer interaction. In the past, many studies have attempted to identify the relationship between the static features of lines and emotions but have overlooked the motion features of hand-drawn lines. However, some recent studies have shown that the motion behaviour implied by hand-drawn lines has a significant impact on viewers' aesthetic-emotional judgments. In this study, we sought to explore the motion features that have a key impact when people actively express emotions through drawing lines. In the experiment, subjects actively expressed specified emotions by drawing lines by hand, and their pen movement data were fully recorded on a digital screen. Several static and motion features were estimated using the experimental data. Moreover, we quantified their correlations with emotional pleasure and arousal through multiple ordered logistic regression analysis. The resulting static and motion features that significantly affect the emotional expression of lines were identified. In addition, a variety of motion features were crucial in the emotional expression of hand-drawn lines. This could help guide artists and designers in their creative work and has the potential to be used in the development of emotional computing applications for line, picture, interactive art, and graphic design.
... Some scholars suggest that hand-rendered and photographic depictions represent a meaningful epistemic gap because the information that can be extracted by them differs necessarily due to the medium (Perini, 2012). For example, characteristics of artworks such as brush strokes or handwritten letters can enhance aesthetic appreciation (Ticini et al., 2014;Longcamp et al., 2003). For this reason, a focal point of the current study is rendering style, and how altering the visual style of an image may influence viewers' ability to like images of pain and, by extension, empathize with them. ...
... It suggested that the insula and amygdala are involved in the process of regulating emotional reappraisals of mutilation images with fictitious precedent depictions (Mocaiber et al., 2011). Previously discussed evidence demonstrated the strength that illustrated visuals (both computer-made and hand-depicted) have to enhance the aesthetic experience (Maciejewski et al., 2007;Ticini et al., 2014;Longcamp et al., 2003). Cognitive processes, such as inference of mental states, and empathy-related patterns of fMRI activity in the ACC and amygdala are shown to be present in cartoon depictions of social scenes, suggesting that illustrated images can simulate realistic emotional or mental states (Völlm et al, 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
Art is capable of evoking empathetic and aesthetic responses in the presence of negative content like pain and suffering. The impact that artistic modes of depiction have on aesthetic and empathetic responses to painful stimuli has not been fully explored. In this study, participants viewed neutral and painful stimuli depicting humans with visible and invisible injuries across plain and artistic rendering styles. The results of an analysis of variance and mediation analysis suggested that an artistic rendering style impacts empathetic responses in two ways: (a) An artistic rendering style communicates visual pain information, which directly increases cognitive empathy, and (b) an artistic rendering style impacts affective empathy, but this relationship is mediated by how much the viewer likes the image. This study illustrates the capacity of images to modulate multidimensional empathy by utilizing visual aids and aesthetic appeal. This has important implications for any discipline that treats, trains, informs, or entertains through the use of images depicting pain.
... In a non-virtual context, previous studies have already examined how the body affects the artwork's impression. For example, experiments have confirmed that hand movements (Leder et al., 2012;Ticini et al., 2014), eye movements (Matsumoto & Okada, 2021a), and hands-on creative activities (Matsumoto & Okada, 2021b) affect viewers' esthetic impression. In a broader sense, these findings are closely related to recent theories, such as those of Carbon (2019Carbon ( , 2020, which emphasize what kind of physical context an artwork is viewed within. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study focuses on the process of viewers’ engagement with artwork in virtual spaces. Specifically, we propose a methodology that combines two approaches: (a) measuring movements within virtual spaces, and (b) using non-immersive virtual reality. We attempt to demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology through experimentation. In the experiment, we recorded the exploration of sculptures in virtual spaces of 317 participants using a newly developed system (Virtual Exhibition Space for Tracking and Analyzing system). Results from multiple statistical analyses, including hierarchical Bayesian analysis, indicated differences in view-angles and distances traveled while viewing the artworks under different experimental conditions (where different instructions were given prior to viewing). These findings support the theoretical expectation that the “mode” of viewing artworks is influenced by instructions given before viewing, which is further corroborated by the observed differences in the pattern of psychological measurements between conditions. Based on previous research and these experimental results, we discuss the effectiveness and generalizability of our methodology in capturing variations in the art-viewing process as a tool for studying art-viewing behavior not only in virtual but also in real environments.
... The researchers of the study in question provide as a possible explanation author's skills in giving a sense of movement to the work. A further clue comes from another study [34], also providing a possible bridge between functional parallelism and liking in the Michelangelo effect. Images of a gloved hand holding a paintbrush were used as supraliminal priming before displaying a pointilliststyle painting. ...
Chapter
In recent years, research has increasingly explored the efficacy of art therapy for conditions such as stroke, uncovering benefits like the “Michelangelo effect”, which enhances motor performance in individuals exposed to aesthetically pleasing artwork during specific activities. While standardized stimuli are often used, their clinical effectiveness is questionable. Providing a positive experience with subjectively appreciated visual stimuli is crucial, as it enhances patient engagement and therapeutic outcomes. For this reason, our study aims to understand which paintings, starting from an existing dataset, are most appreciated and which characteristics make them more interesting for observers. We enrolled 59 healthy subjects who evaluated 60 abstract paintings based on pleasantness and element salience. Results highlighted preferences for warm colors, prominent elements, and a sense of movement influencing aesthetic appreciation. Possible hypotheses of these results are linked to the importance of spatial attention, depth perception and visuo-motor integration when viewing paintings. These findings informed the selection of stimulus sets for future motor neurorehabilitation protocols.
... Unfortunately, the link between embodied cognition and art appreciation has not been shown using neuroimaging. However, correlations between motor priming and art appreciation have been reported (e.g., Ticini et al., 2014). We hypothesize that EEG correlates of motor control such as mu rhythm modulation could, therefore, be informative of AE. ...
Article
Full-text available
In today's digital information age, human exposure to visual artifacts has reached an unprecedented quasi-omnipresence. Some of these cultural artifacts are elevated to the status of artworks which indicates a special appreciation of these objects. For many persons, the perception of such artworks coincides with aesthetic experiences (AE) that can positively affect health and wellbeing. AEs are composed of complex cognitive and affective mental and physiological states. More profound scientific understanding of the neural dynamics behind AEs would allow the development of passive Brain-Computer-Interfaces (BCI) that offer personalized art presentation to improve AE without the necessity of explicit user feedback. However, previous empirical research in visual neuroaesthetics predominantly investigated functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-Related-Potentials correlates of AE in unnaturalistic laboratory conditions which might not be the best features for practical neuroaesthetic BCIs. Furthermore, AE has, until recently, largely been framed as the experience of beauty or pleasantness. Yet, these concepts do not encompass all types of AE. Thus, the scope of these concepts is too narrow to allow personalized and optimal art experience across individuals and cultures. This narrative mini-review summarizes the state-of-the-art in oscillatory Electroencephalography (EEG) based visual neuroaesthetics and paints a road map toward the development of ecologically valid neuroaesthetic passive BCI systems that could optimize AEs, as well as their beneficial consequences. We detail reported oscillatory EEG correlates of AEs, as well as machine learning approaches to classify AE. We also highlight current limitations in neuroaesthetics and suggest future directions to improve EEG decoding of AE.
... For example, Forster et al. (2013) found that subjective fluency (or felt fluency, which is the subjective experience of how fluent a stimulus was processed) affected liking ratings of images even more than objective fluency (i.e., objective qualities of a stimulus such as blurriness or complexity). Furthermore, an increase in perceptual fluency-achieved by presenting primes that match the motoric actions used for creating the depicted style of art (e.g., hand holding a paintbrush with a "precision grip" for pointillistic art) compared to nonmatching motoric movements-was found to enhance appreciation for paintings (Leder et al., 2012;Ticini et al., 2014). Finally, an increase in conceptual fluencyachieved by presenting paintings with semantically congruent compared to incongruent bogus titles-was found to enhance appreciation for abstract artworks (Belke et al., 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
Understanding an artwork is essential for aesthetic experiences. But how does one form an understanding of art? To investigate this still poorly addressed process, we hypothesized that the easier a stimulus is processed (i.e., higher fluency), the easier it should be understood. We focused on artwork inherent features (i.e., style and content) and their interactions affect processing. Making use of the brightness–positivity association, the overall brightness of paintings (i.e., as stylistic feature) was manipulated to match their content (positive vs. negative). We hypothesized that a congruency of style and content would facilitate the processing of paintings resulting in a better understanding, but also, greater liking, and (exploratively) higher artistic value. Our data indicated no congruency effects between brightness and content, but that content alone was a strong predictor for art processing and—in an exploratory approach—highlighted the importance of individual differences in terms of art interest and knowledge in our sample.
Article
Not only many aspects of dance performances such as performers’ movements, music, stage design, but also characteristics of observers should have critical roles in enhancing the observer’s pleasure and aesthetic evaluation in dance performances. This study examines how evaluations of dance performance of three different street dance genres are influenced by the total practice time and the recognition of psychical reproducibility between dancers’ specialized and non-specialized genres. We carried out online experiment, in which each participant rated the degrees of beauty, arousal, liking, complexity, and recognition of reproducibility. Using a variety of methods, we analyzed changes in aesthetic evaluation according to expertise and its generalization and segmentation from the perspective of dancers’ specialized and non-specialized genres. The results revealed commonalities and uniqueness between genres, suggesting the universality and the diversity of beauty.
Article
Full-text available
We examined the influence of affective priming on the appreciation of abstract artworks using an evaluative priming task. Facial primes (showing happiness, disgust or no emotion) were presented under brief (Stimulus Onset Asynchrony, SOA = 20ms) and extended (SOA = 300ms) conditions. Differences in aesthetic liking for abstract paintings depending on the emotion expressed in the preceding primes provided a measure of the priming effect. The results showed that, for the extended SOA, artworks were liked more when preceded by happiness primes and less when preceded by disgust primes. Facial expressions of happiness, though not of disgust, exerted similar effects in the brief SOA condition. Subjective measures and a forced-choice task revealed no evidence of prime awareness in the suboptimal condition. Our results are congruent with findings showing that the affective transfer elicited by priming biases evaluative judgments, extending previous research to the domain of aesthetic appreciation.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to test the involvement of sensorimotor cortical circuits during the beholding of the static consequences of hand gestures devoid of any meaning.In order to verify this hypothesis we performed an EEG experiment presenting to participants images of abstract works of art with marked traces of brushstrokes. The EEG data were analyzed by using Event Related Potentials (ERPs). We aimed to demonstrate a direct involvement of sensorimotor cortical circuits during the beholding of these selected works of abstract art. The stimuli consisted of three different abstract black and white paintings by Franz Kline. Results verified our experimental hypothesis showing the activation of premotor and motor cortical areas during stimuli observation. In addition, abstract works of art observation elicited the activation of reward-related orbitofrontal areas, and cognitive categorization-related prefrontal areas. The cortical sensorimotor activation is a fundamental neurophysiological demonstration of the direct involvement of the cortical motor system in perception of static meaningless images belonging to abstract art. These results support the role of embodied simulation of artist's gestures in the perception of works of art.
Data
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to test the involvement of sensorimotor cortical circuits during the beholding of the static consequences of hand gestures devoid of any meaning.In order to verify this hypothesis we performed an EEG experiment presenting to participants images of abstract works of art with marked traces of brushstrokes. The EEG data were analyzed by using Event Related Potentials (ERPs). We aimed to demonstrate a direct involvement of sensorimotor cortical circuits during the beholding of these selected works of abstract art. The stimuli consisted of three different abstract black and white paintings by Franz Kline. Results verified our experimental hypothesis showing the activation of premotor and motor cortical areas during stimuli observation. In addition, abstract works of art observation elicited the activation of reward-related orbitofrontal areas, and cognitive categorization-related prefrontal areas. The cortical sensorimotor activation is a fundamental neurophysiological demonstration of the direct involvement of the cortical motor system in perception of static meaningless images belonging to abstract art. These results support the role of embodied simulation of artist's gestures in the perception of works of art. Citation: Sbriscia-Fioretti B, Berchio C, Freedberg D, Gallese V, Umiltà MA (2013) ERP Modulation during Observation of Abstract Paintings by Franz Kline. PLoS ONE 8(10): e75241. Copyright: ß 2013 Sbriscia-Fioretti et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Article
Full-text available
The affective primacy hypothesis (R. B. Zajonc, 1980) asserts that positive and negative affective reactions can be evoked with minimal stimulus input and virtually no cognitive processing. The present work tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of affective and cognitive priming under extremely brief (suboptimal) and longer (optimal) exposure durations. At suboptimal exposures only affective primes produced significant shifts in Ss' judgments of novel stimuli. These results suggest that when affect is elicited outside of conscious awareness, it is diffuse and nonspecific, and its origin and address are not accessible. Having minimal cognitive participation, such gross and nonspecific affective reactions can therefore be diffused or displaced onto unrelated stimuli. At optimal exposures this pattern of results was reversed such that only cognitive primes produced significant shifts in judgments. Together, these results support the affective primacy hypothesis.
Article
Full-text available
The role of the motor system in the perception of visual art remains to be better understood. Earlier studies on the visual perception of abstract art (from Gestalt theory, as in Arnheim, 1954 and 1988, to balance preference studies as in Locher and Stappers, 2002, and more recent work by Locher et al., 2007; Redies, 2007, and Taylor et al., 2011), neglected the question, while the field of neuroesthetics (Ramachandran and Hirstein, 1999; Zeki, 1999) mostly concentrated on figurative works. Much recent work has demonstrated the multimodality of vision, encompassing the activation of motor, somatosensory, and viscero-motor brain regions. The present study investigated whether the observation of high-resolution digitized static images of abstract paintings by Lucio Fontana is associated with specific cortical motor activation in the beholder's brain. Mu rhythm suppression was evoked by the observation of original art works but not by control stimuli (as in the case of graphically modified versions of these works). Most interestingly, previous visual exposure to the stimuli did not affect the mu rhythm suppression induced by their observation. The present results clearly show the involvement of the cortical motor system in the viewing of static abstract art works.
Article
According to the body-specificity hypothesis, hearing action words creates body-specific mental simulations of the actions. Handedness should, therefore, affect mental simulations. Given that pictures of actions also evoke mental simulations and often accompany words to be learned, would pictures that mismatch the mental simulation of words negatively affect learning? We investigated effects of pictures with a left-handed, right-handed, or bimanual perspective on left- and right-handers' learning of object-manipulation words in an artificial language. Right-handers recalled fewer definitions of words learned with a corresponding left-handed-perspective picture than with a right-handed-perspective picture. For left-handers, there was no effect of perspective. These findings suggest that mismatches between pictures and mental simulations evoked by hearing action words can negatively affect right-handers' learning. Left-handers, who encounter the right-handed perspective frequently, could presumably overcome the lack of motor experience with visual experience and, therefore, not be influenced by picture perspective.
Article
Neuropsychological investigations of art production and perception have the potential to offer critical insight into the biology of visual aesthetics. Thus far, however, investigations of art production in patients have been limited to anecdotal observations and investigations of art perception are non-existent. Progress in the field is hampered by the lack of an adequate instrument to provide basic quantification of artwork attributes. Motivated by the need to move neuropsychology of art beyond the fascinating anecdote, we present the Assessment of Art Attributes (AAA). The AAA is an instrument designed to assess six formal-perceptual and six conceptual-representational attributes using 24 paintings from the Western canon. Both artistically naïve and experienced participants were given the AAA. We found high degrees of agreement in the assessment of these attributes in both groups and few differences between the groups. We expect that the AAA's componential and quantitative approach will be useful in advancing neuropsychological studies as well as any investigations in which style and content of art works need to be quantified and compared.
Article
We recorded brain activity when 21 subjects judged the beauty (aesthetic or affective judgment) and brightness (perceptual or cognitive judgment) of simultaneously presented paintings. Aesthetic judgments engaged medial and lateral subdivisions of the orbitofrontal cortex as well as subcortical stations associated with affective motor planning (globus pallidus, putamen-claustrum, amygdala, and cerebellar vermis), whereas the motor, premotor and supplementary motor areas, as well as the anterior insula and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, were engaged by both kinds of judgment. The results lead us to conclude: (i) that there is a functional specialization for judgment, with aesthetic judgments engaging distinct systems, in addition to those that they share with perceptual judgments; (ii) that the systems engaged by affective judgments are those in which activity correlates with polar experiences (e.g. love-hate, beauty-ugliness, and attraction-repulsion); and (iii) that there is also a functional specialization in the motor pathways, with aesthetic judgments engaging motor systems not engaged by perceptual judgments, in addition to those engaged by both kinds of judgment.