ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2000); however, recent research suggests that there is a potential for faux-ADHD diagnoses (Pressman & Imber, 2011) which may be due to externalizing problems with a different etiology. One etiology that has received attention is sleep-related behaviors, in so far as they have been correlated with behavioral problems (Presman & Imber, 2011; and see Thunström, 2002 for research on severe infant sleep problems predicting later ADHD diagnoses). This paper adds to the research in suggesting further factors that should be considered by researchers and clinicians.
This article was downloaded by: [Tracy Cassels]
On: 31 December 2012, At: 14:28
Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered
office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
The American Journal of Family Therapy
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uaft20
ADHD, Sleep Problems, and Bed Sharing:
Future Considerations
Tracy G. Cassels a
a Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, Canada
Version of record first published: 26 Dec 2012.
To cite this article: Tracy G. Cassels (2013): ADHD, Sleep Problems, and Bed Sharing: Future
Considerations, The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41:1, 13-25
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2012.661653
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation
that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any
instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary
sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings,
demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41:13–25, 2013
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 0192-6187 print / 1521-0383 online
DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2012.661653
ADHD, Sleep Problems, and Bed Sharing:
Future Considerations
TRACY G. CASSELS
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most
common childhood disorders (American Psychiatric Association,
2000); however, recent research suggests that there is a potential
for faux-ADHD diagnoses (Pressman & Imber, 2011) which may be
due to externalizing problems with a different etiology. One etiology
that has received attention is sleep-related behaviors, in so far as
they have been correlated with behavioral problems (Presman &
Imber, 2011; and see Thunstr¨
om, 2002 for research on severe infant
sleep problems predicting later ADHD diagnoses). This paper adds to
the research in suggesting further factors that should be considered
by researchers and clinicians.
A recently published study introducing the concept of Faux Attention
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (Pressman & Imber, 2011) opened
the doors to understanding how family bedtime routines may impact the
diagnosis of ADHD. The current article explores ways in which to build on
this research and to highlight factors clinicians and parents should be aware
of when faced with a child displaying disruptive behaviors. Of particular
interest are bringing into play socio-economic status (SES) and cultural fac-
tors, as well as the consideration of the impact of intentional vs. reactive
bed sharing in the understanding of the effect of family bedtime routines on
daytime behavior of children.
ADHD is a disorder characterized by “a persistent pattern of inattention
and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity” (American Psychiatric Association, 2000,
The preparation of this article was supported by a fellowship to the author by the Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The author would like to thank the
reviewers of this article for their helpful and insightful comments. She would also like to
thank Drs. Pressman and Imber for their work which served as the catalyst for this article.
Address correspondence to Tracy G. Cassels, Department of Psychology, University of
British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V5Y 1T6, Canada. E-mail: tracy@psych.
ubc.ca
13
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
14 T. G. Cassels
p. 85). Specific examples of inattention include being easily distracted and
forgetful in daily activities; specific examples of hyperactivity and impulsivity
include fidgeting with hands or feet and interrupting or intruding on others
(APA, 2000, p. 92). Sleep disorders or dysfunction have frequently been
implicated in ADHD for both children and adults. The prevalence of sleep
dysfunction in ADHD has been well documented (for a review, see Cohen-
Zion & Ancoli-Israel, 2004), with research on various treatments showing
improvement in both sleep patterns and externalizing behaviors (Yehuda,
Rabinovitz-Shenkar, & Carasso, 2011; Youssef, Ege, Angly, Strauss, & Marx,
2011). This research presupposes that the diagnosis of ADHD is valid and
that sleep dysfunction is either a product of the ADHD or simply comorbid
with it. However, Pressman and Imber’s (2011) research suggests that this
may not always be the case. For example, research into the prevalence
of ADHD in childhood consistently suggests a rate of 5–6% (e.g., Faraone,
Sergeant, Gillberg, & Biederman, 2003; Neuman et al., 2005), yet in Pressman
and Imber’s (2011) study, 25% of parents reported being told by their doctor
that their child should be taking medication for their behavior ‘often’ or
‘usually/always’. A five-fold increase in drug recommendations for children
implies that doctors and clinicians are not considering all possibilities before
administering a diagnosis of ADHD.
The correlates of sleep problems include similar behaviors to those
found in ADHD, making false diagnoses not only possible but probable. It
has been well documented that a lack of enough sleep can manifest in vari-
ous behavioral problems in childhood (e.g., Kataria, Swanson, & Trevathan,
1987; Zuckerman, Stevenson, & Bailey, 1987). For example, Zuckerman and
colleagues (1987) found that sleep problems at 3 years of age were cor-
related with both tantrums and behavior management problems and with
sleep problems at 8 months, suggesting an early etiology for sleep prob-
lems in childhood. This long-term, persistent pattern of behavioral problems
may lead clinicians to believe that the behaviors are not related to sleep
disturbances and thus label the symptoms as those of ADHD as opposed
to sleep-related. While there has been a fair amount of research into sleep
disturbances and their associated problems, virtually none of the research
has examined what causes sleep disturbances in childhood. And yet, if clin-
icians are to treat children displaying with behavioral problems, identifying
the behaviors as sleep-related and understanding the etiology of their sleep
problems is paramount.
In this vein Drs. Pressman and Imber (2011) took the much-needed
step in examining bedtime routines and their role in daytime behavioral
problems and the possibility of faux-ADHD diagnoses in children aged 2
to 13. They found strong relationships between both the presence of bed
sharing and the lack of a set bed time and various externalizing behaviors and
the potential for faux-ADHD diagnoses. Notably, both bed sharing and not
having a set bedtime have been suggested as being related to sleep disorders
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
ADHD and Sleep Problems 15
in children by other researchers (Kataria et al., 1986; Lozoff, Askew, & Wolf,
1996; Lozoff, Wolf, & Davis, 1984; Madansky & Edelbrock, 1990; Mindell,
Kuhn, Lewin, Meltzer, & Sadeh, 2006; Mindell, Telofski, Wiegand, & Kurtz,
2009). Given the previously outlined relationship between sleep disorders
and behavioral problems, it is logical to believe these factors may result in
faux-ADHD diagnoses; however, this would be ill-advised as it ignores a
fuller picture that is necessary to make accurate diagnoses and treatment
recommendations. Pressman and Imber’s findings have paved the way for
researchers to consider other factors in the intricate web of relationships
between ADHD, sleep disorders, daytime behavior, and bed sharing and I
hope to highlight some of these factors that should be considered going
forward.
FACTORS IN RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADHD
AND SLEEP DISORDERS
Child’s Age
Many studies looking at the diagnosis of ADHD and the behaviors associ-
ated with it include broad age-ranges (e.g., Pressman & Imber, 2011; Owens
et al., 2009); however, it is questionable as to whether parents and clinicians
alike are aware of or considerate of the normative externalizing behaviors
that can be expected across development. The reasons for these external-
izing behaviors, their manifestation, and their frequency are expected to be
qualitatively different across development and this may temper the relation-
ship to ADHD. For example, in reviewing how we conceptualize problem
behaviors in young children, Keenan and Wakschlag (2002) found that dis-
ruptive behaviors in preschool-aged children are not only expected, but quite
normative in most cases. While some behaviors persist to become clinically-
relevant, the vast majority do not. In another study on the frequency and
severity of behavioral disorders in preschool children, Crowther and col-
leagues (1981) reported that a substantial proportion of normative children
aged 2 to 5 displayed certain externalizing behaviors with a high degree of
severity. As children age, however, these externalizing behaviors decrease in
frequency (e.g., Bongers, Koot, van der Ende, & Verhulst, 2004; Fischer, Rolf,
Hasazi, & Cummings, 1984), but can increase in severity (for a review, see
Loeber & Hay, 1997), suggesting that some children may present with myriad
problem behaviors, but none which will persist to become severe. Thus the
question of when a diagnosis of ADHD is appropriate becomes paramount.
While there are many children, and even some quite young children, who
will clearly fit the criteria for ADHD, research into the remission of symp-
toms suggests a natural decline of these problematic behaviors over time.
Biederman and colleagues (2000) examined age-related declines in ADHD
syndromes and symptoms in 128 boys from under 6 years of age through
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
16 T. G. Cassels
20 years of age. By 20 years of age, there was a 60% decline in ADHD
syndromes, meaning 60% of individuals diagnosed prior to that age were
found to no longer qualify for an ADHD diagnosis. Importantly, there was
a near-linear relationship between age and ADHD syndromatic remission.
One interpretation is that the syndrome of ADHD is transient, but another is
that clinicians are providing a diagnosis of behavior in young children, the
etiology of which may be unrelated to ADHD.
In addition to the effects on possible ADHD diagnoses, age should
also be taken into account when considering bedtime behaviors and sleep
problems. With respect to sleep problems, dominant Western views are
that infants and young children should be sleeping through the night with
many researchers suggesting that anything other than that is problematic
(e.g., France & Hudson, 1993; Thiedke, 2001). However, the interpretation
of problematic sleep patterns is not so simple. Amongst other cultures and
even within some subcultures of the United States, night time waking is con-
sidered normal for infants and younger children (Keller & Goldberg, 2004;
Lozoff et al., 1984, 1996) and thus the behavior itself is not seen as being
symptomatic of sleep dysfunction, but simply part of a normal child’s night-
time behavior. Notably some research suggests that there are no negative
effects on certain child and maternal outcomes based on whether or not a
child was sleeping through the night by age one (Germo, Goldberg, & Keller,
2009). This highlights the need for greater exploration into the individual cir-
cumstances surrounding sleep dysfunction in young children as opposed to
the set criteria of sleeping through the night or not. With respect to bed-
time routines and sleeping arrangements, research suggests that as children
age, the proportion of children co-sleeping or bed sharing decreases (e.g.,
Madansky & Edelbrock, 1990; Welles-Nystrom, 2005). In younger children,
the relationship to daytime externalizing behaviors may simply be a spurious
relationship due to the presence of two age-normative behaviors; therefore,
bed sharing may not offer much in the way of decreasing unwanted daytime
behaviors or helping sleep problems for that age group.
Child’s Socio-Economic Status
While the role of the researcher is to isolate a construct from external effects
in order to examine it and the role of the clinician is to tease apart the symp-
toms from the person, there are certain cases in which the personal variables
must be considered as being vital to the symptoms. Socio-economic status
(SES) is one of these cases. There is myriad research suggesting that the fam-
ily environment has a large effect on children’s behavior and SES is consis-
tently labeled a culprit in contributing to and exacerbating the externalizing
problems of ADHD (Counts et al., 2005; Pressman et al., 2006; Schneider &
Eisenberg, 2006). Counts and colleagues (2005) examined how familial risk
factors—including SES, marital conflict, and stressful life events—affected
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
ADHD and Sleep Problems 17
children’s ADHD symptoms in children aged 7 to 13. They found that SES
was uniquely related to conduct disorder symptomology, with lower SES
correlating with a greater number of conduct disorder symptoms. Pressman
and colleagues (2006) found that the family environment was also signif-
icantly associated with ADHD impairment for children aged 5 to 18. In a
larger and more systematic analysis, Schneider and Eisenberg (2006) utilized
the Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey-Kindergarten Cohort data to look at
what factors were the greatest predictors in ADHD diagnoses. With a sample
of nearly 10,000 children, one of the most significant predictors was SES;
specifically, low-SES predicted an increased risk and high SES predicted a
decreased risk of being diagnosed with ADHD.
In addition to the links between SES and ADHD externalizing behaviors,
SES has been linked to externalizing behaviors more generally. For example,
Kalff and colleagues (2001) found that child behavior problems were more
likely in children aged 5 to 7 of low-SES households or who lived in lower
SES neighborhoods. In a similar study, neighborhood-level SES was found
to predict total, internalizing, and externalizing problems in a sample of
children aged 10-14 years (Schneiders et al., 2003). Achenbach and Edelbrock
(1981) compared 1,300 referred children aged 4 through 16 with 1,300 non-
referred children using the Child Behavior Checklist and found that low-SES
children showed greater behavioral problems and lower social competency.
Given this link between SES and behavioral problems, it is worth questioning
whether the behavioral problems displayed by some children in lower SES
households and neighborhoods is really a product of their environment and
providing an ADHD diagnosis is simply the easiest way in which to deal
with the problem.
SES also has been found to relate to bed sharing and sleep problems,
making it even more important to consider when examining the potential
for sleep-related factors to influence externalizing behavior. First, parents in
lower SES groups are more likely to bed share, not just between parent and
child, but between siblings as well (e.g., Hauck, Signore, Fein, & Raju, 2008;
Horsley et al., 2007). While financial constraints may be part of the reason
for this practice—after all, owning a home with multiple bedrooms and
beds is no cheap endeavor—there may also be cultural factors at play. The
majority of cultures in the United States that practice bed sharing regularly are
typically those that also fall into lower SES categories (e.g., African-America,
Hispanic) (e.g., Lozoff et al., 1984). It is possible that findings of bed sharing
contributing to behavioral problems are really an example of a third variable
problem with SES affecting both bed sharing rates and externalizing behavior.
It is possible that SES affects bed sharing rates which then affect externalizing
behaviors, however, cultural considerations (which will be discussed in the
next section) make this possibility less likely. Furthermore, it is difficult to
disentangle the effects of SES from culture in the United States as they are so
intertwined, and thus consideration of SES may end up being consideration
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
18 T. G. Cassels
of cultural factors independent of SES. Second, recent longitudinal research
in the United States suggests a relationship between SES and both sleep
problems and behavioral outcomes in children in both grades three and five
(El-Sheikh, Kelly, Buckhalt, & Hinnant, 2010). In this study, children from
low-SES homes were found to be at higher risk for sleep problems than
children from higher-SES homes. Furthermore, sleep problems and SES were
predictive of externalizing behaviors in the group at both time points (grades
three and five). These findings were complimentary to those presented earlier
by the same group of researchers, which found low-SES children were more
likely to sleep less and report greater sleep problems than high-SES children
independent of ethnicity or culture (El-Sheikh et al., 2007).
Cultural Considerations
The most common concern with respect to culture and ADHD is the cross-
cultural validity of ADHD, with debate surrounding how best to conceptu-
alize ADHD—cultural construct or neurobiological disorder (Ali, 1996; An-
derson, 1996). However, more recent cross-cultural data (Rohde et al., 2005)
and reviews of the existent data (Faraone et al., 2003; Polanczyk et al., 2007)
should put that notion to rest as the rate of 5–6% remains relatively stable
worldwide. However, there is a cultural consideration that has received less
attention and yet is worthy of future research—the predominantly ethnic di-
vide in the diagnosis of ADHD in the United States. Within the United States,
being Caucasian is a strong predictor of being diagnosed with ADHD. In a
national sample of nearly 10,000 children, the rate of diagnosis was 5.44%, in
line with the known worldwide rates, but over 80% of those diagnosed were
Caucasian children (Schneider & Eisenberg, 2006), suggesting either that the
ADHD syndrome is somehow uniquely targeting these individuals, which
seems unlikely given the neurobiological explanations typically associated
with ADHD (see Ali, 1996), or there is another factor at play that has yet
to be identified. Pulling from the research on sleep problems and culture
(e.g., Ball, Hooker, & Kelly, 1999; Keller & Goldberg, 2004; Lozoff et al.,
1984, 1996), it is possible that there are cultural differences in the types of
behaviors expected of children at certain ages and that the failure to meet
these expectations is sending some parents to clinicians for diagnoses and
treatments.
Sleeping arrangements and parental acceptance of children’s external-
izing behaviors are also subject to cultural influences. For example, some
research has suggested that frequent co-sleeping or bed sharing is associ-
ated with sleep problems (e.g., Madansky and Edelbrock, 1990) and that
sleep problems are related to behavioral problems (e.g., Kataria et al., 1987).
As such, it would be easy for clinicians to suggest that parents do not bed
share in hopes of reducing sleep—and therefore behavioral—problems, but
such a move would ignore the wealth of cultural research into bed sharing
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
ADHD and Sleep Problems 19
that contradicts such an automatic suggestion. Notably, other cultures with
high bed sharing rates in both infancy and childhood do not have the behav-
ioral problems found in North America (e.g., Kataria et al., 1986; Madansky &
Edelbrock, 1990). In Sweden, the practice of bed sharing is incredibly com-
mon, with one estimate putting over half of children still bed sharing at least
part of the time at 4–5 years of age (Welles-Nystrom, 2005), and yet Swedish
children present with much lower rates of emotional and behavioral prob-
lems than their Western counterparts (Larsson & Frisk, 1999). Importantly
though, the relationship between sleep problems and behavioral difficulties
exists in Swedish culture, but bed sharing is not one of the features leading
to sleep problems (Smedje, Broman, & Hetta, 2001). Similar findings exist
for Japan, which boasts some of the highest rates of bed sharing across de-
veloped nations (Owens, 2004), but which also boasts some of the lowest
rates of emotional and behavioral problems (Matsuura et al., 1989).
In addition to the failure to find these relationships in other cultures,
within North America the effects of bed sharing and sleep problems de-
pend upon culture. Betsy Lozoff and colleagues (1984; 1996) examined co-
sleeping habits in American families and found significant differences based
on culture. First, they found the incidence of co-sleeping is much higher in
African-American families (70%) than Caucasian families (35%) (Lozoff et al.,
1984). Second, only in Caucasian families was co-sleeping related to disrup-
tive sleep (Lozoff et al., 1984), and even this was moderated by SES, with
low-SES Caucasian families and high-SES African-American families reporting
problems with co-sleeping (Lozoff et al., 1996). It is unclear if the behaviors
between groups are different or if the differences are due to parental inter-
pretation of the behavior. In line with this second possibility, research on
bed sharing and sleep disturbances in early childhood in the United States
found that while parents of bed sharing children reported greater tempera-
mental problems, the children’s teachers ratings made no such predictions
(Hayes, Parker, Sallinen, & Davare, 2001), suggesting differences in parental
interpretation of behaviors. These findings by Hayes and colleagues (2001)
suggest that it is the parental interpretation of their child’s behavior that may
influence the diagnosis of ADHD, for if parents do not perceive a problem,
they will not seek treatment. Thus identifying cultural norms for particu-
lar behaviors, both sleep-related and with respect to daytime behaviors, is
paramount.
Reactive Versus Intentional Bed Sharing
Several studies have suggested sleep disorders or problems associated with
bed sharing in childhood (e.g., Madansky & Edelbrock, 1990), but as pre-
viously mentioned in the Culture section, results of various studies do not
support this link in different cultures (e.g., Smedje et al., 2001). One fac-
tor that may explain some of these differences is the distinction between
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
20 T. G. Cassels
different types of bed sharing a family is engaging in, namely the distinction
between reactive and intentional bed sharing. Reactive bed sharing refers to
bed sharing in which the parent starts to bring the child to bed after the
age of one and typically in response to bad sleeping patterns by the child.
Intentional bed sharing refers to parents who intended to bed share and did
so from early infancy onward. In both Swedish and Japanese cultures bed
sharing is common from birth onward, meaning it fits into the intentional bed
sharing framework, and this may be (part of) the reason why bed sharing is
not implicated in sleep or behavioral problems.
A similar argument can be made for North America as children who
reactively bed share have been found to have markedly different outcomes
than intentional bed sharers, both behaviorally and with respect to sleep
patterns. For example, Keller and Goldberg (2004) found that early bed
sharers were more likely to be self-reliant and socially independent relative
to reactive bed sharers and solitary sleepers. Reactive bed sharers, on the
other hand, were more likely to display sleep problems—typically night
wakings—that were deemed to be disruptive to the family unit, and were
found to be less socially independent than the other groups. Other research
also supports the relationship between intentional bed sharing and positive
child outcomes (Abel et al., 2001) while reactive bed sharing continues to
be associated with various childhood problems (e.g., Simard et al., 2008).
Much of the aforementioned work on bed sharing and behavioral problems
has failed to consider the context in which bed sharing is occurring. In
the case of reactive bed sharers, which may be a large portion of North
American families because of the lower base rates of this behavior, bed
sharing may be a symptom of sleep problems rather than a cause. As Keller
and Goldberg (2004) noted, reactive bed sharers may have turned to bed
sharing in hopes of reducing the incidences of nighttime problem behavior,
thus the negative sleep patterns were already in place when bed sharing
began.
Importantly, in cases where intentional bed sharing occurs, changing the
sleeping arrangement may have little to no impact on externalizing behavior.
In one longitudinal study of sleeping arrangements and sleep problems, bed
sharing and night-wakings during early infancy were not predictive of bed
sharing and night-wakings in childhood (Jenni et al., 2005). Furthermore,
in an 18-year longitudinal study on bed sharing, bed sharing in infancy
and early childhood was unrelated to any sleep disorder, pathologies, or
problematic behaviors at age 6 and at age 18 (Okami, Weisner, & Olmstead,
2002). Therefore, any attempt by clinicians to treat behavioral problems via
a change in sleeping arrangements must be cognizant of the reasons behind
the sleeping arrangement, the cultural considerations, and whether there
is a likelihood that that arrangement will help modify both sleeping and
externalizing behaviors.
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
ADHD and Sleep Problems 21
Implications for Pressman and Imber’s Findings
The research on bed sharing, sleep problems, ADHD, and externalizing
behaviors is complicated with little direct study of the interconnections be-
tween the constructs. Pressman and Imber (2011), in taking that first step,
have put their research as one of the first models for other researchers to
build from. They have rightfully pointed out areas—bedtime routines and
bed sharing—deserving of inquiry in relationship to daytime behaviors and
faux-ADHD diagnoses. Indeed, research into bedtime routines has supported
the idea that a set bedtime with routine can help eliminate sleep problems in
young children (Mindell, Telofski, Wiegand, & Kurtz, 2009) which may help
reduce externalizing problems as well. However, more research is necessary
in order to fully understand the implications of and possible reasons behind
faux-ADHD.
Recommendations for Treatment
Given the apparent surge in pharmaceutical recommendations (typically cou-
pled with an ADHD diagnosis) to children (Pressman & Imber, 2011), it
seems prudent that clinicians and researchers work to discover other possi-
ble etiologies for these problematic behaviors. When presented with a child
whose symptomology may indicate a possible ADHD diagnosis, the clinician
should first consider the age of the patient and whether or not the behavior is
age-appropriate. This is particularly important when considering the types of
behavior used to diagnose ADHD as many of them (e.g., fidgeting) are very
common in younger children when put in situations where they are asked to
keep still for long period of time (e.g., preschool or school). Simply because
a parent finds behavior problematic does not make it a disorder, and yet
some diagnostic measures (for both sleep problems and ADHD symptoms)
rely solely on the parent (or teacher) report of behaviors as problematic.
Utilizing a more stringent, objective criterion which involves comparisons to
known base rates of behaviors in the diagnosis of any disorder is strongly rec-
ommended. Adjusting parental expectations may be another way to decrease
the rates of faux-ADHD, particularly amongst Caucasian families where the
rates of diagnosis are abnormally high. Second, family variables need to be
taken into account. A child does not exist in a vacuum and neither does
his or her behavior. A family’s cultural practices, economic circumstances,
and environment will all play a role in how that child behaves. All treatment
recommendations must consider whether or not the behavior being targeted
is culturally important and thus less susceptible to change. Additionally, be-
ing open to not asking a family to change a certain cultural behavior can
help the overall therapeutic relationship which may make the family more
willing to attempt other forms of treatment (or even the initial treatment with
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
22 T. G. Cassels
time). Finally, clinicians should be aware of the very important nuances that
can exist within a particular behavior. Using bed sharing as an example,
the different outcomes associated with intentional versus reactive bed shar-
ing highlight the need to inquire about when bed sharing began and under
what circumstances. If it began at birth and has been intentionally continued,
it is likely that changing that sleeping arrangement would have little effect on
sleep problems. Taking these recommendations and combining them with
the knowledge imparted by Pressman and Imber (2011) on the possibility
of faux-ADHD diagnoses should help reduce the risk of overmedicating and
overdiagnosing children.
REFERENCES
Abel, S., Park, J., Tipene-Leach, D., Finau, S., & Lennan, M. (2001). Infant care
practices in New Zealand: A cross-cultural qualitative study. Social Science &
Medicine,53, 1135–1148.
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1981). Behavioral problems and competencies
reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,46, 1–82.
Ali, O. (1996). Childhood hyperactivity. Lancet,348, 895–896.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of men-
tal health disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, J. C. (1996). Is childhood hyperactivity the product of western culture?
Lancet,348, 73–74.
Ball, H. L., Hooker, E., & Kelly, P. J. (1999). Where will the baby sleep? Attitudes
and practices of new and experienced parents regarding cosleeping with their
newborn infants. American Anthropologist,101, 143–151.
Biederman, J., Mick, E., & Faraone, S. V. (2000). Age-dependent decline of symptoms
of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Impact of remission definition and
symptom type. The American Journal of Psychiatry,157, 816–818.
Bongers, I. L., Koot, H. M., Van Der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2004). Developmen-
tal trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence. Child
Development,75, 1523–1537.
Cohen-Zion, M., & Ancoli-Israel, S. (2004). Sleep in children with attention-deficit hy-
peractivity disorder (ADHD): A review of naturalistic and stimulant intervention
studies. Sleep Medicine Reviews,8, 379–402.
Counts, C. A., Nigg, J. T., Stawicki, J. A., Rappley, M. D., & Von Eye, A. (2005). Family
adversity in DSM-IV ADHD combined and inattentive subtypes and associated
disruptive behavior problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child &
Adolescent Psychiatry,44, 690–698.
Crowther, J. H., Bond, L. A., & Rolf, J. E. (1981). The incidence, prevalence, and
severity of behavior disorders among preschool-aged children in day care. Jour-
nal of Abnormal Child Psychology,9, 23–42.
El-Sheikh, M., Buckhalt, J. A., Keller, P. S., Cummings, E., & Acebo, C. (2007). Child
emotional insecurity and academic achievement: The role of sleep disruptions.
Journal of Family Psychology,21, 29–38.
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
ADHD and Sleep Problems 23
El-Sheikh, M., Kelly, R. J., Buckhalt, J. A., & Hinnant, J. B. (2010). Children’s sleep and
adjustment over time: The role of socioeconomic context. Child Development,
81, 870–883.
Faraone, S. V., Sergeant, J., Gillberg, C., & Biederman, J. (2003). The worldwide
prevalence of ADHD: Is it an American condition? World Psychiatry,2, 104–113.
Fischer, M., Rolf, J. E., Hasazi, J. E., & Cummings, L. (1984). Follow-up of a preschool
epidemiological sample: Cross-age continuities and predictions of later adjust-
ment with internalizing and externalizing dimensions of behavior. Child Devel-
opment,55, 137–150.
France, K. G., & Hudson, S. M. (1993). Management of infant sleep disturbance: A
review. Clinical Psychology Review,13, 635–647.
Germo, G. R., Goldberg, W. A., & Keller, M. A. (2009). Learning to sleep through the
night: Solution or strain for mothers and young children? Infant Mental Health
Journal,30, 223–244.
Hauck, F. R., Signore, C., Fein, S. B., & Raju, T. N. K. (2008). Infant sleeping arrange-
ments and practices during the first year of life. Pediatrics,122,(Supplement 2)
S113–S120.
Hayes, M. J., Parker, K. G., Sallinen, B., & Davare, A. A. (2001). Bed sharing, tem-
perament, and sleep disturbance in early childhood. SLEEP,24, 657–662.
Horsley, T., Clifford, T., Barrowman, N., Bennett, S., Yazdi, F., Sampson, M., ...
Cˆ
ot´
e, A. (2007). Benefits and harms associated with the practice of bed sharing.
Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine,161, 237–245.
Jenni, O. G., Fuhrer, H. Z., Iglowstein, I., Molinari, L., & Largo, R. H. (2005). A
longitudinal study of bed sharing and sleep problems among Swiss children in
the first 10 years of life. Pediatrics,115, 233–240.
Kalff, A. C., Kroes, M., Vles, J. S. H., Hendriksen, J. G. M., Feron, F. J. M., Steyaert,
J., ... van Os, J. (2001). Neighbourhood level and individual level SES effects
on child problem behavior: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology &
Community Health,55, 246–250.
Kataria, S., Swanson, M. S., & Trevathan, G. E. (1987). Persistence of sleep distur-
bances in preschool children. Journal of Pediatrics,110, 642–646.
Keenan, K., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2002). Can a valid diagnosis of disruptive behavior
disorder be made in preschool children? American Journal of Psychiatry,159,
351–358.
Keller, M. A., & Goldberg, W. A. (2004). Co-sleeping: Help or hindrance for young
children’s independence? Infant and Child Development,13, 369–388.
Larsson, B., & Frisk, M. (1999). Social competence and emotional/behavior prob-
lems in 6–16 year-old Swedish school children. European Child & Adolescent
Psychiatry,8, 24–33.
Loeber, R., & Hay, D. (1997). Key issues in the development of aggression and
violence from childhood to early adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology,48,
371–410.
Lozoff, B., Askew, G. L., & Wolf, A. W. (1996). Cosleeping and early childhood
sleep problems: Effects of ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Journal of Devel-
opmental and Behavioral Pediatrics,17, 9–15.
Lozoff, B., Wolf, A. W., & Davis, N. S. (1984). Cosleeping in urban families with
young children in the United States. Pediatrics,74, 171–182.
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
24 T. G. Cassels
Madansky, D., & Edelbrock, C. (1990). Cosleeping in a community sample of 2- and
3-year-old children. Pediatrics,86, e197–e203.
Matsuura, M., Okubo, Y., Kato, M., Kojima, T., Takahashi, R., Asai, K., ... Suzuki, M.
(1989). An epidemiological investigation of emotional and behavioral problems
in primary school children in Japan: The report of the first phase of a WHO
collaborative study in Western Pacific Region. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric
Epidemiology,24, 17–22.
Mindell, J. A., Telofski, L. S., Wiegand, B., & Kurtz, E. S. (2009). A nightly bedtime
routine: Impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood. Sleep,32,
599–606.
Neuman, R. J., Sitdhirksa, N., Reich, W., Ji, T. H., Joyner, C. A., Sun, L. W., & Todd, R.
D. (2005). Estimation of prevalence of DSM-IV and latent class-defined ADHD
subtypes in a population-based sample of child and adolescent twins. Twin
Research and Human Genetics,8, 392–401.
Okami, P., Weisner, T., & Olmstead, R. (2002). Outcome correlates of parent-child
bed sharing: an eighteen-year longitudinal study. Developmental and Behavioral
Pediatrics,23, 244–253.
Owens, J., Sangal, R. B., Sutton, V. K., Bakken, R., Allen, A. J., & Kelsey, D.
(2009). Subjective and objective measures of sleep in children with attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Sleep Medicine,10, 446–456.
Owens, J. A. (2004). Sleep in children: Cross-cultural perspectives. Sleep and Biolog-
ical Rhythms,2, 165–173.
Polanczyk, G., de Lima, M. S., Horta, B. L., Biederman, J., & Rohde, L. A. (2007).
The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: A systematic review and metaregression
analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry,164, 942–948.
Pressman L. J., Loo, S. K., Carpenter, E. M., Asarnow, J. R., Lynn, D., McCracken,
J. T., ... Smalley, S. L. (2006). Relationship of family environment and parental
psychiatric diagnosis to impairment in ADHD. Journal of the American Academy
of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,45, 346–354.
Pressman, R. M., & Imber, S. C. (2011). Relationship of children’s daytime behavior
problems with bedtime routines/practices: A family context and the considera-
tion of faux-ADHD. The American Journal of Family Therapy,39(5), 404–418.
Rohde, L. A., Szobot, C., Polanczyk, G., Schmitz, M., Martins, S., & Tramontina, S.
(2005). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a diverse culture: Do research
and clinical findings support the notion of a cultural construct for the disorder?
Biological Psychiatry,57, 1436–1441.
Schneider, H., & Eisenberg, D. (2006). Who receives a diagnosis of attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the United States elementary school population.
Pediatrics,117, e601–e609.
Schneiders, J., Drukker, M., van der Ende, J., Verhulst, F.C., van Os, J., & Nicol-
son, N. A. (2003). Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and behavioral
problems from late childhood into early adolescence. Journal of Epidemiology
& Community Health,57, 699–703.
Simard, V., Nielsen, T. A., Tremblay, R. E., Boivin, M., & Montplaisir, J. Y. (2008).
Longitudinal study of preschool sleep disturbance: The predictive role of mal-
adaptive parental behaviors, early sleep problems, and child/mother psycho-
logical factors. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine,162, 360–367.
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
ADHD and Sleep Problems 25
Smedje, H., Broman, J.-E., & Hetta, J. (2001). Associations between disturbed sleep
and behavioral difficulties in 635 children aged six to eight years: A study based
on parents’ perceptions. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,10,19.
Sobanksi, E., Schredl, M., Kettler, N., & Alm, B. (2008). Sleep in adults with atten-
tion deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) before and during treatment with
methylphenidate: A controlled polysomnographic study. Sleep,31, 375–381.
Thiedke, C. C. (2001). Sleep disorders and sleep problems in childhood. American
Family Physician,63, 277–284.
Thunstr¨
om, M. (2002). Severe sleep problems in infancy associated with subsequent
development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder at 5.5 years of age. Acta
Paediatrica,91, 584–592.
Welles-Nystrom, B. (2005). Co-sleeping as a window into Swedish culture: Consid-
erations of gender and health care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science,
19, 354–360.
Yehuda, S., Rabinovitz-Shenkar, S., & Carasso, R. L. (2011). Effects of essential fatty
acids in iron deficient and sleep-disturbed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD) children. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,65, 1167–1169.
Youssef, N. A., Ege, M., Angly, S. S., Strauss, J. L., & Marx, C. E. (2011). Is obstructive
sleep apnea associated with ADHD? Annals of Clinical Psychiatry,23, 213–224.
Zuckerman, B., Stevenson, J., & Bailey, V. (1987). Sleep problems in early child-
hood: Continuities, predictive factors, and behavioral correlates. Pediatrics,80,
664–671.
Downloaded by [Tracy Cassels] at 14:28 31 December 2012
... Bed-sharing can be intentional or reactive. Intentional bed sharing refers to parents who intended to bed share and do so from early infancy onward (Cassels, 2013). Parents may bed-share with the child intentionally due to cultural beliefs, breastfeeding facilitation, parental ideology, parental own sleep experiences, convenience, anxiety, child safety, parent and child emotional needs, better infant sleep, unavailability of other beds, enjoyment, physical proximity to the infant, and better caregiving (Mileva-Seitz et al., 2016). ...
... Parents may bed-share with the child intentionally due to cultural beliefs, breastfeeding facilitation, parental ideology, parental own sleep experiences, convenience, anxiety, child safety, parent and child emotional needs, better infant sleep, unavailability of other beds, enjoyment, physical proximity to the infant, and better caregiving (Mileva-Seitz et al., 2016). On the other hand, bed-sharing can be reactive in which the parent starts to bring the child to bed after the age of one year in response to problematic circumstances typically in response to bad sleeping patterns by the child (Mileva-Seitz et al., 2016, Cassels, 2013. ...
... Bed-sharing is said to be one of the parental practices most influenced by cultural practice and beliefs and the effects of bed-sharing over child behavior may depend upon culture. In the United States, for instance, parents of bed-sharing children report greater temperamental problems whereas in other cultures like in Sweden and Japan, with high bed-sharing rates in both infancy and childhood, the rates of emotional and behavioral problems are low (Cassels, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Little is known about the effect of bed-sharing with the mother over the child mental health. Methods: Population-based birth cohort conducted in Pelotas, Brazil. Children were enrolled at birth (n=4231) and followed-up at 3 months and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years of age. Bed-sharing was defined as "habitual sharing of the bed between the child and the mother, for sleeping, for part of the night or the whole night". Trajectories of bed sharing between 3 months and 6 years of age were calculated. Mental health was assessed at the age of 6 years using the Development and Well-Being Assessment instrument that generates psychiatric diagnosis according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were obtained by multivariate logistic regression. Results: 3583 children were analyzed. Four trajectories were identified: non bed-sharers (44.4%), early-only (36.2%), late-onset (12.0%), and persistent bed-sharers (7.4%). In the adjusted analyses persistent bed-sharers were at increased odds of presenting any psychiatric disorder (OR=1.7; 1.2-2.5) and internalizing problems (OR=2.1; 1.4-3.1), as compared to non bed-sharers. Among the early-only bed-sharers OR for any psychiatric disorder was 1.4 (1.1-1.8) and for internalizing problems 1.6 (1.2-2.1). Limitations: Although the effect of bed-sharing was adjusted for several covariates including the family socio-economic status, maternal mental health and excessive crying, there was no information on maternal personal reasons for bed-sharing. Mothers that bed-share intentionally and those that bed-share in reaction to a child sleep problem may have a different interpretation of their children behavior that may bias the study results. Conclusion: Bed-sharing is a common practice in our setting and is associated with impaired child mental health at the age of six years.
... Reactive bed sharing is a specific type of accommodation behavior that involves the parents allowing the child to sleep in the same bed as a response to the child's sleep disturbance behavior (Cassels, 2013;Mileva-Seitz, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Battaini, & Luijk, 2017). Whereas intended bed sharing derives from valued familial or cultural traditions, reactive bed sharing is often done in "desperation" or for "convenience" when immediately reacting to the child's sleep disturbance behavior (Keller & Goldberg, 2004, p. 371). ...
... Reactive bed sharing, a specific form of accommodation, was also significantly related to children's disturbance in sleep initiation and maintenance. A regular pattern of reactive bed sharing also may reinforce the child's disturbance in sleep initiation and maintenance (Cassels, 2013;Mileva-Seitz et al., 2017) and may limit the child's development of self-soothing techniques. This is consistent with previous research that has shown bed sharing to be related to children's sleep problems (Cortesi et al., 2008;Coulombe & Reid, 2014;Jenni, Fuhrer, Iglowstein, Molinari, & Largo, 2005;Jiang et al., 2016;Keller & Goldberg, 2004). ...
Article
The present study examined relationships among parental mental health and sleep, parental bedtime accommodation behaviors, and children’s sleep disturbances. Parental bedtime accommodations (see Table 2 for items) were assessed using a novel measure modified from an existing measure of paren- tal accommodations for pediatric OCD. Participants (N = 282) were parents of children 2 to 12 years of age. Results indicated parental mental health and sleep predicted higher levels of parental accommodation. Greater parental accommodation and sleep problems uniquely predicted increased disturbances in children’s sleep. Findings could inform assessments and treatments of children’s sleep disturbance and identification of familial patterns.
... because of better regulated infant temperament (e.g. the Japanese), rather than the other way around. France and Blampied call bed-sharing a 'coercive behavior trap', where parents bed-share in order to reduce the aversive events of infant distress [151]; this trap, however, is seen to apply to parents who view bed-sharing and child sleep-time activities as problematic [147], which might be framed by cultural context [152][153][154][155][156][157]. ...
... The mixed findings of such studies might be based on mothers' different motives for bed-sharing [5]. Finally, some have argued that in cultures with high rates of bedsharing, there is an absence of the child problems that are found in North America to be associated with bed-sharing, particularly emotional and behavior problems [153]. ...
Article
The practice of parent and child sharing a sleeping surface, or ‘bed-sharing’, is one of the most controversial topics in parenting research. The lay literature has popularized and polarized this debate, offering on one hand claims of dangers, and on the other, of benefits - both physical and psychological - associated with bed-sharing. To address the scientific evidence behind such claims, we systematically reviewed k=659 published papers (peer-reviewed, editorial pieces, and commentaries) on the topic of parent-child bed-sharing. Our review offers a narrative walkthrough of the many subdomains of bed-sharing research, including its many correlates (e.g., socioeconomic and cultural factors) and purported risks or outcomes (e.g., sudden infant death syndrome, sleep problems). We found general design limitations and a lack of convincing evidence in the literature, which preclude making strong generalizations. A heat-map based on k=98 eligible studies aids the reader to visualize world-wide prevalence in bed-sharing and highlights the need for further research in societies where bed-sharing is the norm. We urge for multiple subfields - Anthropology, Psychology/Psychiatry, and Pediatrics - to come together with the aim of understanding infant sleep and how nightly proximity to the parents influences children’s social, emotional, and physical development.
... These challenges tend to worsen problems with hyperactivity, inattention, difficulty in concentrating, disruptive behaviors, and poor school performance [14]. Consistent bedtimes have shown to improve sleep [8]; however as children with ADHD exhibit bedtime resistance, set bedtimes can be difficult to implement. ...
Conference Paper
Families of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) often report morning and bedtime routines to be stressful and frustrating. Through a design process involving domain professionals and families we designed MOBERO, a smartphone-based system that assists families in establishing healthy morning and bedtime routines with the aim to assist the child in becoming independent and lowering the parents’ frustration levels. In a two-week intervention with 13 children with ADHD and their families, MOBERO significantly improved children’s independence and reduced parents’ frustration levels. Additionally, use of MOBERO was associated with a 16.5% reduction in core ADHD symptoms and an 8.3% improvement in the child’s sleep habits, both measured by standardized questionnaires. Our study highlights the potential of assistive technologies to change the everyday practices of families of children with ADHD.
... Furthermore, most published studies on this topic address the symptoms of ADHD, and only a few of the available articles are based on children with a clinical diagnosis of ADHD. More importantly, professionals may not always consider the possibility of difficulties with sleep when assessing children referred to them for evaluation due to ADHD/HKDlike symptoms or when treating children with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD or HKD [12,29,30]. Finally, very few sleep studies to date (and perhaps none in recent years) have considered clinical samples of hyperactive children using the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria, i.e., clinical samples identified as having a diagnosis of HKD. ...
... Furthermore, most published studies on this topic address the symptoms of ADHD, and only a few of the available articles are based on children with a clinical diagnosis of ADHD. More importantly, professionals may not always consider the possibility of difficulties with sleep when assessing children referred to them for evaluation due to ADHD/HKDlike symptoms or when treating children with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD or HKD [12,29,30]. Finally, very few sleep studies to date (and perhaps none in recent years) have considered clinical samples of hyperactive children using the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria, i.e., clinical samples identified as having a diagnosis of HKD. ...
Article
This study aimed primarily to compare the parent-reported sleep of children with ICD-10 hyperkinetic disorder (HKD) versus community children. Thirty children aged 5-13 years (83.3 % boys) diagnosed with HKD by their child and adolescent psychiatrists took part in this study, plus 30 community children, matched for sex, age, and school year. Compared to the controls, the HKD children showed significantly later bedtimes, stronger bedtime resistance, longer sleep latency, shorter sleep; more frequent behaviors and symptoms concerning falling asleep into parents bed, needing something special to initiate sleep, nightmares, sleep talking, sleep bruxism, fear from darkness, bedwetting, and, most notably, loud snoring (26.7 %); they also tended to show higher daytime somnolence. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/HKD children may thus have more sleep-related problems than typically developing children. Alternatively, our results may reflect misdiagnoses; thus, special attention should be directed to comorbidity and differential diagnosis issues between sleep disturbances and ADHD/HKD. [Published online: 26 November 2013]
Article
A critical co‐sleeping literature review revealed individualistic and dyadic guided approaches taken insofar, ridden by conflicting results. Thereby, we situated our approach beyond the individual and dyad area where we developed anew a systemic co‐sleeping paradigm, resulting in theoretical and preliminary empirical findings. Initial cross‐gender analyses associated significantly co‐sleeping with Bowen Family Systems Theory's cornerstone constructs. However, once the moderating effect of gender was examined, significance disappeared across the board for females yet persisted for males. Specifically, male‐children time‐persistent co‐sleeping was associated negatively with differentiation and positively with chronic anxiety and other hypothesized maladjustment effects (guilty feelings and abandonment feelings if moved away from parents). Effects drew attention to Bowen's systemic construct of intergenerational emotional fusion. Guided by the empirical associations, we focused on gender development differences literature. We suggest that triangulation processes dynamically embed co‐sleeping within the family systems paradigm, with the embedment appearing to be significantly gendered.
Article
Full-text available
An evolutionary perspective on human infant sleep physiology suggests that parent-infant cosleeping, practiced under safe conditions, might be beneficial to both mothers and infants. However, cosleeping is not part of mainstream parenting ideology in the United States or the United Kingdom, and little evidence is available to indicate whether, and under what circumstances, parents sleep with their newborn infants. We present data from an anthropological investigation into the practices and attitudes of new and experienced parents of newborn infants regarding parent-infant sleeping arrangements in a community in the northeast of England. Despite not having contemplated cosleeping prior to the birth, new parents in our sample found it to be a convenient nighttime caregiving strategy, and one which was practiced regularly. Infants slept with both their parents, some being habitual all-night cosleepers, but commonly beginning the night in a cnb and sleeping with their parents for several hours following the early morning feed, [infant sleep, newborn, cosleeping, new parents]
Article
The prevalence and correlates of sleeping in the parental bed among healthy children between 6 months and 4 years of age are described. One hundred fifty children were enrolled in an interview study on the basis of "well-child" care appointments in representative pediatric facilities. The sample created was similar in demographic characteristics to census data for the Cleveland area. In this cross section of families in a large US city, cosleeping was a routine and recent practice in 35% of white and 70% of black families. Cosleeping in both racial groups was associated with approaches to sleep management at bedtime that emphasized parental involvement and body contact. Specifically, cosleeping children were significantly more likely to fall asleep out of bed and to have adult company and body contact at bedtime. Among white families only, cosleeping was associated with the older child, lower level of parental education, less professional training, increased family stress, a more ambivalent maternal attitude toward the child, and disruptive sleep problems in the child.
Article
Study Objective: Temperament was explored as a factor in both night-waking and bedsharing in preschool-aged children. Design: Bedsharers and solitary sleepers were categorized based on the frequency of current bedsharing. MANOVA was used to examine associations among temperament and sleep measures. Setting: Two preschools affiliated with a rural university in the Northeast United States. Participants. 67 children between 2.4-5.6 years of age from two University-affiliated preschools were studied. Intervention: Child temperament was rated by parents and teachers using the Carey Temperament Scale and compared to night-waking, current sleep habits, and the circumstances in which bedsharing occurred Measurements and Results: Parents and preschool teachers completed the Carey Temperament Scale for 3-7 year olds. Parents also scored the Sleep Habits Inventory and the Sleeping Arrangements Inventory, which provided a current and retrospective history of the child's sleep location and sleep patterns. Parents' ratings showed that bedsharers have less regular bedtimes; difficulty with sleep onset; more night-waking; and seek out the parents following awakening during the night. Temperamentally, bedsharers were found to be more intense and exhibit less adaptability and rhythmicity. However, teachers' temperament ratings did not predict bedsharing and were not concordant with parental ratings. Conclusions: These findings suggest that bedsharing at preschool age is a complex phenomenon related to parents' ratings of child temperament, sleep habits, and disturbances such as night waking. Implications for the clinical assessment of sleep disorders are discussed.
Article
Infant sleep disturbance affects between 15 and 35% of infants and their parents. Despite the significance of the problem there exists little guidance for clinicians dealing with this group. Interventions advocated by the literature range from spanking to medication. Normal sleep state development in infants and the influence of temperament is described, as are infancy and infant sleep disturbance.Treatment regimes that have been subjected to some degree of empirical evaluation are reviewed. These have been the pharmacological approaches, and from a behavioral perspective, scheduled awakening, extinction and its modifications, stimulus control, and finally studies employing a variety of methods. Treatment outcomes using these techniques are discussed in relation to practical considerations, side effects, and acceptability to parents. The single prevention evaluation is described, as is the need for further research in this area.
Article
The study examined the relationship between childhood daytime behavior problems and bedtime routines and practices. Participants were 704 parents of children ages 2–13 who completed a questionnaire in 14 pediatric offices in Providence, Rhode Island. Of particular interest was the highly significant relationship (p-value < 0.0001) between children who bed share or lack regular bedtimes and whose parents are told they should take medicine for behavior or learning problems; and between children who bed share and have physically aggressive behavior toward a parent. Recommendations were made regarding integration of the results in the context of family treatment as well as the consideration of a faux-ADHD.
Article
Associations between sleep and behaviour in 635 children, aged six to eight years, were investigated using parental responses to a sleep habits questionnaire, and to a behavioural screening form, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Global reports of sleep problems in 4.9% of the children were associated with a total SDQ score indicative of behaviour problems in 36% of the cases. Conversely, 15% of children with behaviour problems had global reports of sleep problems. Associations between specific sleeping features and different dimensions of behaviour and emotions were also explored. Hyperactivity was associated with tossing and turning during sleep, and with sleep walking; conduct problems were related to bedtime resistance; and emotional symptoms were associated with night terrors, difficulty falling asleep and daytime somnolence. Peer problems were associated with somewhat shorter total sleep time. Finally, a total SDQ score indicative of behaviour problems was associated with bedwetting, nightmares, tossing and turning during sleep and sleep walking, as well as with a slightly shorter total sleep time. We conclude that sleep and behaviour problems are associated in children, and that characteristic associations exist between particular sleep disturbances and specific dimensions of behaviour.
Article
Is the process of helping infants and young children learn to sleep through the night a solution to family sleep problems or does it exacerbate matters for mother and child? Retrospective and current accounts from a nonclinical, convenience sample of 102 mothers of preschool-aged children provided information on sleep issues from early infancy through preschool age. Child, mother, and parenting characteristics, along with family sleep arrangements, were differentially related to the age at which children learned to sleep through the night and to the extent of difficulty that characterized this experience. Mothers who indicated more difficulty as their children learned to sleep through the night also reported more depressive symptoms and more strain in the mother–child relationship. Later age at sleeping through the night was more common among early bedsharers, but timing of sleeping through the night was not associated with preschool children's reported independence in several nonsleep domains. Sleep arrangements and the importance placed on sleeping through the night were the strongest contributors to variance explained in whether children learned to sleep through the night during infancy or toddlerhood. When advising parents about sleep interventions, practitioners should seek to understand whether families' parenting values fit their nighttime sleep practices.
Article
This study investigated the relationship between sleep arrangements and claims regarding possible problems and benefits related to co-sleeping. Participants were 83 mothers of preschool-aged children. Data were collected through parent questionnaires. Early co-sleepers (who began co-sleeping in infancy), reactive co-sleepers (children who began co-sleeping at or after age one), and solitary sleepers were compared on the dimensions of maternal attitudes toward sleep arrangements; night wakings and bedtime struggles; children's self-reliance and independence in social and sleep-related behaviours; and maternal autonomy support. The hypothesis that co-sleeping would interfere with children's independence was partially supported: solitary sleepers fell asleep alone, slept through the night, and weaned earlier than the co-sleepers. However, early co-sleeping children were more self-reliant (e.g. ability to dress oneself) and exhibited more social independence (e.g. make friends by oneself). Mothers of early co-sleeping children were least favourable toward solitary sleep arrangements and most supportive of their child's autonomy, as compared to mothers in other sleep groups. Reactive co-sleepers emerged as a distinct co-sleeping sub-type, with parents reporting frequent night wakings and, contrary to early co-sleepers, experiencing these night wakings as highly disruptive. Implications for parents and pediatricians are discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.