ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

In the present article, we will explore what is known about the production of overt speech during the night. We suggest that the study of sleep-talking may be just as interesting and informative as the study of wakeful speech.
Content may be subject to copyright.
April 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 9 | 1
Neuroscience
Published: 24 April 2014
doi:10.3389/frym.2014.00009
Reviewed by:
Empress
8 years old
Maya
10 years old
Mika
12 years old
Scientic signicance
of sleep talking
David Peeters1,2 and Martin Dresler2
1 Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Netherlands
2 Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
WHAT IS SLEEP TALKING?
Sleep talking (or somniloquy) can be considered as a
part of a larger family of types of “sleep utterances,
such as mumbling, laughing, groaning, and whistling
during sleep. e ancient Greek philosopher
Heraclitus of Ephesus already observed someone sleep
talking about 2,500years ago, so it is not a very recent
discovery. It happens at all ages (provided that one is
capable of speaking!) and may occur during all parts
of the night. Sleep talking is said to be more common
in children than in adults. However, it might also
be the case that sleeping kids are simply more oen
overheard (for instance, by their parents) than adults.
Sometimes, sleep talking is placed among involuntary
behaviors that may happen during sleep (called
“parasomnias”), such as sleepwalking, teeth grinding,
and even types of sleep behavior disorders in which
patients may injure themselves or their bed partner
when involuntarily making dangerous movements
during sleep. However, sleep talking is oen very
innocent and generally does not require any treatment.
An exception is the sleep talking that may start to
occur aer a traumatic experience, as in the case of
soldiers who fought in a war.
WHEN DO WE SLEEP TALK?
Human sleep consists of dierent stages (see the
article Why sleep? by Manoach and Stickgold for
Did one of your parents, siblings, or friends ever tell you that you were talking in your sleep?
Nothing to be ashamed of! A recent study found that more than half of all people have
had the experience of speaking out loud while being asleep [1]. This might even be under-
estimated, because often people do not notice that they are sleep talking, unless some-
body wakes them up or tells them the next day. Most neuroscientists, linguists, and
psychologists studying language are interested in our language production and language
comprehension skills during the day. In this study, we will explore what is known about the
production of overt speech during the night. We suggest that the study of sleep talking may
be just as interesting and informative as the study of wakeful speech.
Scientic signicance of sleep talkingPeeters and Dresler
April 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 9 | 2
a nice overview) which can be distinguished by
inspecting the recordings of electrical activity from
sensors placed on someone’s scalp, a method called
electroencephalography (EEG; see Figure1). While
dreams can occur during all sleep stages, we are
dreaming most vividly in a sleep stage known as
“REM sleep” because of the occurrence of Rapid Eye
Movements. During REM sleep, all body muscles
(with the exception of the eye muscles, obviously) are
paralyzed by neural structures in the brain stem, which
prevent us from acting out our dreams. Accordingly,
complex movements like sleepwalking normally occur
only during non-REM sleep stages. In such cases, a
small part of the brain appears to be awake while the
rest of the brain is asleep [2]. is seems to be true for
sleep talking as well: producing speech requires the
planning and execution of rapid sequences of muscle
movements, hence it will most likely occur in non-
paralyzed, non-REM sleep stages [3]. is suggests
that the speech we say out loud while sleeping (“sleep
talk”) is not necessarily just the overt counterpart
of the things we may silently say in our dreams or
nightmares (“dream speech”). However, overt sleep
talking during REM sleep has also been reported
– which might happen when the brain stem briey
fails to paralyze the body muscles [4]. Anyway, the
existence of sleep talking and of dreams shows that our
brain is not completely “switched o” during sleep.
WHAT DO PEOPLE SAY DURING SLEEP?
e popular view, as encountered in pop songs
and novels, is that people sometimes betray their
innermost secrets during sleep because they have no
control over what they say. A nice example is the song
Nightmares by Josh Ritter. Research has shown that
the disclosure of personal secrets during sleep is very
rare and uncommon [5], although it is not unusual to
allude in sleep talk to things and people encountered
during the day. Sleep talking may reect someone’s
feelings, but not necessarily any “secret” feelings. Lets
have a look at what people actually say while sleep
talking and compare this to the wakeful speech we
produce during the day. Here are some examples of
sleep talk, taken from a large database [5]:
Example A: “Mm, hm – yes, yes”
Example B: “Peacock tree?! eres a tree full of
peacocks and swallows and other
colorations, aabsolutely, aaaabsolutely
g-o-o-or-geous – get my camera, Larry,
and don’t forget to turn the lm or I’ll have
ts when it gets back – come on! God! –
you should see it.” [is was uttered with
an air of brisk alert enthusiasm.]
Example C: “I wanna take a net – a note – a note
At rst sight, these utterances do not look that
dierent from the things we say during the day. And
indeed, in linguistic terms, the similarities between
sleep talk and wakeful speech are striking. Utterances
can be very simple and short such as in Example A,
which is not very dierent from a short backchannel
response in an everyday conversation. Example B, on
the other hand, shows how complex sleep talk can
FIGURE 1 - Electrical brain activity as recorded by five electrodes placed on someone’s scalp, measured in microvolts (μV).
Small deflections in the waves depicted here show that this person is becoming a bit sleepy. Similarly, the inspection of such waves while someone is sleeping
allows us to distinguish different sleep stages.
Scientic signicance of sleep talkingPeeters and Dresler
April 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 9 | 3
a largely automatic process, which may take place
without the need for a speaker to pay to much
attention to it. In turn, this allows the speaker to
focus more on the content of the message [6]. is is
one example of how the study of sleep talk can have
implications for our understanding of wakeful speech
production as well. Box 1 summarizes some fun facts
about sleep talking.
BOX 1 - Some fun facts about sleep talking.
Sleep talking happens at all ages and may
occur during all parts of the night.
Sleep talking is said to be more common in
kids than in adults.
e brain is not completely “switched o”
during the night; otherwise sleep talking
would not be possible.
ere are many songs about sleep talking and
dreaming, for instance Talking In Your Sleep
by e Romantics.
Sleep talk is sometimes more creative than
speech produced during the day!
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
In summary, there are many striking similarities
between wakeful speech and sleep talk, but also
some dierences. Surprisingly, the study of sleep
talking has not received much attention from
scientists over the last 30years. Many questions
remain unanswered, and there is still a lot that
needs to be discovered. Particularly, a good
neurobiological account of the dierences between
sleep talk and wakeful speech in terms of the
activation levels of brain networks involved in
speech production is still lacking. Sleep talking
may therefore be a great topic of study for a new
generation of young minds.
GLOSSARY
Electroencephalography (EEG): A method that
allows researchers and doctors to observe and
be. It includes dierent types of speech act including
a question, a description of a visual scene, and an
imperative (“get my camera”) directed at a specic
addressee (“Larry”), with varying intonation patterns.
Such speech production abilities during the night, as
reected in the above examples, suggest that brain
networks involved in speech production may become
activated while a person is asleep. Based on research
of awake participants, we know that these networks
reside for the greater part in the frontal and temporal
lobes of the brain, mainly in the le hemisphere.
Like everyday colloquial speech, sleep talk may
contain speech errors. Example C shows a putative
speech error that is immediately corrected by the
sleeping speaker. Problems in word nding and
in the correct encoding of sounds that make up a
word seem a bit more common in sleep talk than
in everyday speech. Sometimes, they even resemble
the word nding diculties of people suering
from specic types of aphasia, a language disorder
that is caused by dysfunction of (parts of) the brain.
Another characteristic of some instances of sleep
talk is the apparent lack of thematic coherence of
subsequent utterances. One possibility is that such
utterances are related to dream content, in which
thematically dierent and apparently unrelated
scenes may rapidly follow one another. In contrast
with such decreased abilities during sleep, there are
some anecdotal reports of people being more creative
or eloquent in sleep talk than in wakeful speech, for
instance when speaking a second language. Another
important dierence between sleep talk and everyday
speech is that people oen do not remember the next
day that they have overtly produced speech in their
sleep, let alone what they have said while sleeping.
In contrast to word nding problems and incidental
lack of coherence, the grammatical structure of sleep-
talk sentences is oen perfectly correct. Apparently,
our brains are capable of producing grammatically
correct sentences while we are asleep. is suggests
that building the grammatical structure of a sentence
in speech production (including wakeful speech) is
Scientic signicance of sleep talkingPeeters and Dresler
April 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 9 | 4
2. Bassetti, C., Vella, S., Donati, F., Wielepp, P., and Weder, B. 2000.
SPECT during sleepwalking. Lancet 356:484–485. doi: 10.1016/
S0140-6736(00)02561-7
3. Arkin, A. M., Toth, M. F., Baker, J., and Hastey, J. M. 1970. The
frequency of sleep talking in the laboratory among chronic sleep talkers
and good dream recallers. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 151:369–374. doi:
10.1097/00005053-197012000-00002
4. Uguccioni, G., Pallanca, O., Golmard, J. L., Dodet, P., Herlin, B., Leu-
Semenescu, S., etal. 2013. Sleep-related declarative memory consolidation
and verbal replay during sleep talking in patients with REM sleep behavior
disorder. PLoS One 8:e83352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083352
5. Arkin, A. N. 1981. Sleep Talking. Psychology and Psychophysiology.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Kempen, G. 1981. De architectuur van het spreken. Interdisciplinair
Tijdschrift voor Taal Tekstwetenschap 1:110–123.
Submitted: 24 February 2014; Accepted: 24 March 2014; Published online:
24 April 2014.
Citation: Peeters, D., and Dresler, M. (2014). Scientic signicance of sleep
talking. Front. Young Minds. 2:9. doi: 10.3389/frym.2014.00009
Copyright © 2014 Peeters and Dresler. This is an open-access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original
publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic
practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not
comply with these terms.
analyze brain activity by placing small sensors
(“electrodes”) on a persons scalp.
Frontal lobe: e part of the brain located at the
front of the head, behind the forehead.
Hemisphere: e brain can be divided into a le
part and a right part, which are separated by a large
ssure. e two parts, which are connected, are
called the le hemisphere and the right hemisphere.
Linguist: A person who studies language or dierent
languages. Some linguists, for instance, describe
languages that are only spoken by a small group of
people. Others try to understand why a language
changes over time. Unfortunately, not many linguists
study sleep talking.
Neuroscientist: A person who studies the brain
(and some other parts of the nervous system). Some
neuroscientists, for instance, try to understand what
happens in our brains when we are sleeping.
Temporal lobe: e part of the brain globally located
above and behind the ears, in both hemispheres.
REFERENCES
1. Bjorvatn, B., Grønli, J., and Pallesen, S. 2010. Prevalence of different
parasomnias in the general population. Sleep Med. 11:1031–1034.
doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.07.011
Empress, 8 years old
Mika, 12 years old
I am crazy. I love chicken, gymnastics, soccer, and
swimming. I like to talk with a British accent.
I love watching TV (Glee). I play basketball and soccer.
Later, I like to be a professional videogame player. I like
to cook. I am interested in sports medicine. I like to play
drums and saxophone. I like to sing in front of a mirror.
Maya, 10 years old
I like cardiology. I like rock music, sci-
movies, Game of rones, and to read adult books.
Iwant to learn guitar.
REVIEWED BY: AUTHORS
David Peeters
Martin Dresler
As a cognitive neuroscientist, I study the human brain and
all the fun things we can do with it. I am particularly inter-
ested in how we learn and how we can improve our memory.
In addition, I like to explore what happens in our brain when
we sleep and dream.
Lives in e Netherlands. He studies how our brain allows
us to use one or more languages and hand gestures to com-
municate. He likes running, cycling, sunshine, blueberries,
and reading novels.
... Now, a possible reply to my rebuttal of Claim 1 is that instances of successful linguistic communication without conscious awareness do not imply that sustained conversation is possible in the absence of such conscious awareness. 13 I actually think there is some evidence for people having long conversations (dialogues) while sleep talking (Peeters & Dresler, 2014;Arnulf et al., 2017). Here's an example from (Peeters & Dresler, 2014): ...
... 13 I actually think there is some evidence for people having long conversations (dialogues) while sleep talking (Peeters & Dresler, 2014;Arnulf et al., 2017). Here's an example from (Peeters & Dresler, 2014): ...
Article
Full-text available
Most, if not all, philosophers agree that computers cannot learn what words refers to from raw text alone. While many attacked Searle’s Chinese Room thought experiment, no one seemed to question this most basic assumption. For how can computers learn something that is not in the data? Emily Bender and Alexander Koller (2020) recently presented a related thought experiment—the so-called Octopus thought experiment, which replaces the rule-based interlocutor of Searle’s thought experiment with a neural language model. The Octopus thought experiment was awarded a best paper prize and was widely debated in the AI community. Again, however, even its fiercest opponents accepted the premise that what a word refers to cannot be induced in the absence of direct supervision. I will argue that what a word refers to is probably learnable from raw text alone. Here’s why: higher-order concept co-occurrence statistics are stable across languages and across modalities, because language use (universally) reflects the world we live in (which is relatively stable). Such statistics are sufficient to establish what words refer to. My conjecture is supported by a literature survey, a thought experiment, and an actual experiment.
... Future research should consider the potential relationship between emotional processes and VBs. The literature reported that episodic waking material could be incorporated into the VBs [4,47]. Hence, ST may represent a model for investigating the overt replay of autobiographical material as much as semantic material. ...
... Future research should consider the potential relationship between emotional processes and VBs. The literature reported that episodic waking material could be incorporated into the VBs [4,47]. Hence, ST may represent a model for investigating the overt replay of autobiographical material as much as semantic material. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Sleep talking (ST) is characterized by the production of unaware verbal vocal activations (VBs) during sleep. ST seems potentially linked to linguistic and memory consolidation processes. However, sleep and dream characteristics and the relationship between verbal vocalizations (VBs) and cognitive functions are still unknown. Our study aimed to investigate qualitative sleep and dream features in sleep talkers (STs) compared to healthy subjects (CNTs) through retrospective and longitudinal measures and explore the relationship between ST and memory consolidation. Methods: We recruited N = 29 STs and N = 30 CNTs (age range of 18-35). Participants recorded their dreams and filled out sleep logs for seven consecutive days. Vocal activations of STs were audio-recorded. On the eighth day, we administered a word-pair task. Results: We showed that STs had significantly worse self-reported sleep quality. VBs were positively correlated with sleep fragmentation and negatively associated with the oneiric emotional load. No difference between groups was found in the memory consolidation rate. Conclusions: Although ST is a benign phenomenon, we revealed that ST is associated with more sleep alterations and lower emotional intensity of dreams. In this vein, we support that ST depends on sleep fragmentation and could represent a potential window into sleep-dependent cognitive processes.
... Language during sleep has been mainly studied throughout incoming stimuli [19][20][21][22]. Nonetheless, ST implicitly proves that sleep is not incompatible with both overt and covert language production [17,23,24]. Arnulf et al. [10] investigated the formal features of ST language production, finding the decipherable verbal activations to be grammatically correct and consistent with daytime verbal productions. ...
Article
Study Objectives Sleep talking (ST) has been rarely studied as an isolated phenomenon. Late investigations over the psycholinguistic features of vocal production in ST pointed to coherence with wake language formal features. Therefore, we investigated the EEG correlates of Verbal ST as the overt manifestation of sleep-related language processing, with the hypothesis of shared electrophysiological correlates with wake language production. Methods From a sample of 155 Highly frequent STs, we recorded 13 participants (age range 19–30 years, mean age 24.6 ± 3.3; 7F) via vPSG for at least two consecutive nights, and a total of 28 nights. We first investigated the sleep macrostructure of STs compared to 13 age and gender-matched subjects. We then compared the EEG signal before 21 Verbal STs versus 21 Nonverbal STs (moaning, laughing, crying, etc.) in six STs reporting both vocalization types in Stage 2 NREM sleep. Results The 2 × 2 mixed analysis of variance Group × Night interaction showed no statistically significant effect for macrostructural variables, but significant main effects for Group with lower REM (%), total sleep time, total bedtime, sleep efficiency index, and greater NREM (%) for STs compared to controls. EEG statistical comparisons (paired-samples Student’s t-test) showed a decrement in power spectra for Verbal STs versus Nonverbal STs within the theta and alpha EEG bands, strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere and localized on centro-parietal-occipitals channels. A single left parietal channel (P7) held significance after Bonferroni correction. Conclusions Our results suggest shared neural mechanisms between Verbal ST and language processing during wakefulness and a possible functional overlapping with linguistic planning in wakefulness.
... Alcune attivazioni elettromiografiche fasiche sembrano esser presenti nella muscolatura del parlato anche durante il "dream speech", 255 mentre l'attivazione della muscolatura coinvolta nella produzione linguistica costituisce un prerequisito per la comparsa delle produzioni verbali. Il sonno non sembra incompatibile con l'attivazione del sistema linguistico, 256,257 come implicitamente provato dalla stessa produzione delle vocalizzazioni notturne, nonché dalla più ampia letteratura sulla percezione e processamento del linguaggio in sonno. Il processamento linguistico in sonno è stato maggiormente studiato nel contesto di un'elaborazione di stimoli in ingresso, soprattutto uditivi, somministrati mentre il soggetto sta dormendo. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
INTRODUCTION Sleep Talking (ST) is defined as the utterance of speech during sleep. The available literature cannot address ST as a REM or NREM parasomnias. Rarely studied as an isolated phenomenon, we currently have no definite evidence of its neural correlates. Recently, psycholinguistic features of verbal production in ST has been investigated, pointing to coherence with formal features of the language in wakefulness. This evidence, within the hypothesis of an involvement of parasomnias in sleep-related cognitive processing, suggests the importance of understanding the neural mechanism underlying ST. We aimed to investigate EEG correlates predictive of verbal activation (Verbal ST), with a comparison with Non-verbal ST (moaning, laughing, crying, etc…) with the general hypothesis of shared mechanisms with neural correlates of language processing and production. METHOD Six highly frequent ST (3M, 3F, age 19-27, mean 23.83±3.60) recruited through an online survey (general health assessment, PSQI for the self-declared quality of sleep, MUPS for self-declared presence and frequency of the phenomenon). Presence and frequency of ST, together with the compliance in maintaining a regular sleep schedule, has been further assessed through one week of home sleep/dream-logs and audio-activated recorder. The suitable participants have been recorded in the laboratory for at least 2-consecutive nights of video-PSG. We pursued the conditions of Verbal and Non-verbal ST, obtaining a total of 21 Verbal ST and 21 Non-verbal ST in Stage 2 NREM. Control comparison has been performed between Vocalizations (N=42 vocal activations, combining Verbal and Non-verbal) and Baseline (N=42 equivalent sleep interval, 2 mins preceding each ST), to assess time-locking and specificity of the observed EEG pattern, in relation with vocal production. Artifacts were off-line rejected for the 20 seconds EEG preceding each Verbal and Non-verbal ST and Baseline, on a 4-seconds basis. EEG power spectra have been obtained throughout a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) routine. The power spectra have been then averaged to obtain the canonical sleep EEG bands: delta (0.5-4.5Hz), theta (4.75-7.75Hz), alpha (8-11.75Hz), sigma (12-15.75Hz) and beta (16-24.75Hz), and subsequently log-transformed. RESULTS Statistical comparisons (t-Test) show a general decrement in power spectra for Verbal ST vs. Non-verbal ST for the theta and alpha EEG bands. This effect is strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere and specifically localized on centro-parietal-occipitals channels. A single left parietal channel (P7; theta t=-4.48, p=0.0002; alpha t=-3.29, p=0.0037) was significant also after the Bonferroni correction. T-test comparisons (t=≥2.96; p≤0.0051) for Vocalizations vs. Baseline show a general increment in power spectra for delta on frontal, central and temporal channels, almost on the entire scalp for the alpha band; on Fc2 and C4 for the beta band. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest shared neural mechanisms between Verbal ST and language programming during wakefulness. Specifically, the selective decrement for the theta band on the left parietal sites is coherent with the literature about linguistic planning in wakefulness, suggesting a possible functional overlapping. Moreover, the phenomenon seems time-locked to the interval of sleep preceding ST, as demonstrated throughout a comparison with a preceding sleep interval.
Article
Sleep talking is one of the most common altered nocturnal behaviours in the whole population. It does not represent a pathological condition and consists in the unaware production of vocalisations during sleep. Although in the last few decades we have experienced a remarkable increase in knowledge about cognitive processes and behavioural manifestations during sleep, the literature regarding sleep talking remains dated and fragmentary. We first provide an overview of historical and recent findings regarding sleep talking, and we then discuss the phenomenon in the context of mental activity during sleep. It is shown that verbal utterances, reflecting the ongoing dream content, may represent the unique possibility to access the dreamlike mental experience directly. Furthermore, we discuss such phenomena within a cognitive theoretical framework, considering both the atypical activation of psycholinguistic circuits during sleep and the implications of verbal ‘replay’ of recent learning in memory consolidation. Despite current knowledge on such a common experience being far from complete, an in-depth analysis of sleep talking episodes could offer interesting opportunities to address fundamental questions on dreaming or information processing during sleep. Further systematic polysomnographic and neuroimaging investigations are expected to shed new light on the manifestation of the phenomenon and related aspects.
Article
Full-text available
To determine if sleep talkers with REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) would utter during REM sleep sentences learned before sleep, and to evaluate their verbal memory consolidation during sleep. Eighteen patients with RBD and 10 controls performed two verbal memory tasks (16 words from the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test and a 220-263 word long modified Story Recall Test) in the evening, followed by nocturnal video-polysomnography and morning recall (night-time consolidation). In 9 patients with RBD, daytime consolidation (morning learning/recall, evening recall) was also evaluated with the modified Story Recall Test in a cross-over order. Two RBD patients with dementia were studied separately. Sleep talking was recorded using video-polysomnography, and the utterances were compared to the studied texts by two external judges. Sleep-related verbal memory consolidation was maintained in patients with RBD (+24±36% words) as in controls (+9±18%, p=0.3). The two demented patients with RBD also exhibited excellent nighttime consolidation. The post-sleep performance was unrelated to the sleep measures (including continuity, stages, fragmentation and apnea-hypopnea index). Daytime consolidation (-9±19%) was worse than night-time consolidation (+29±45%, p=0.03) in the subgroup of 9 patients with RBD. Eleven patients with RBD spoke during REM sleep and pronounced a median of 20 words, which represented 0.0003% of sleep with spoken language. A single patient uttered a sentence that was judged to be semantically (but not literally) related to the text learned before sleep. Verbal declarative memory normally consolidates during sleep in patients with RBD. The incorporation of learned material within REM sleep-associated sleep talking in one patient (unbeknownst to himself) at the semantic level suggests a replay at a highly cognitive creative level.
Article
Presents a history and critical examination of sleep mentation research since the onset of electrographic laboratory methods. New, empirical sleep studies are included. Although the focus is on data, several chapters relate new research to clinical utilization of dreams and to the field of cognitive psychology. Topics explored include methodological techniques, models of sleep mentation in relation to physiological events, and the influence of several experimental variables (e.g., external stimuli, drugs, REM deprivation). (43 p ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
To estimate lifetime and current prevalence (defined as having experienced the specific parasomnia at least once during the last 3 months) of different parasomnias in the general population. In addition, to study the relationship between the different parasomnias and gender, depressive mood, and symptoms of sleep apnea, insomnia and restless legs, as well as estimating the prevalence of having multiple parasomnias. Population based cross-sectional study. One thousand randomly selected adults (51% female), 18years and above, participated in a telephone interview in Norway. Lifetime prevalence of the different parasomnias varied from about 4% to 67%. For sleep walking lifetime prevalence was 22.4% and current prevalence 1.7%. For the other parasomnias, lifetime and current prevalence were as follows: sleep talking 66.8% and 17.7%, confusional arousal 18.5% and 6.9%, sleep terror 10.4% and 2.7%, injured yourself during sleep 4.3% and 0.9%, injured somebody else during sleep 3.8% and 0.4%, sexual acts during sleep 7.1% and 2.7%, nightmare 66.2% and 19.4%, dream enactment 15.0% and 5.0%, sleep related groaning 31.3% and 13.5%, and sleep-related eating 4.5% and 2.2%. Depressive mood was associated with confusional arousal, sleep terror, sleep-related injury, and nightmare. There were few associations between the parasomnias and gender and symptoms of sleep apnea, insomnia, and restless legs, respectively. About 12% reported having five or more parasomnias. This is one of few population based studies investigating the prevalence of parasomnias. Several parasomnias were highly prevalent in the general population. The data need to be interpreted with caution due to methodological issues, i.e., low response rate and single questions.
Article
Chronic sleep talkers utter sleep speech under laboratory conditions at a sufficiently frequent rate as to be capable of providing useful material for study. Fifty-three base line experiments consisting of one or more nights of monitored, otherwise undisturbed sleep were performed on 13 paid subjects offering a history of chronic sleep talking. A total of 206 speeches was recorded. Marked individual differences were observed in total frequency of sleep speech episodes as well as differences in tendencies of association with sleep stages. In general, 20 to 25% of speeches are associated with rapid eye movement period sleep and 75 to 80% are associated with non-rapid eye movement sleep. Additional similar experiments were performed on two larger subject pools: one of chronic sleep talkers and another of good dream recallers with a low arousal threshold. Frequencies of sleep speech and association with specific sleep stages are reported for these conditions as well.
Article
Sleepwalking is a dissociation between body sleep and mind sleep. We report single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in a man with a history of sleepwalking. Our findings suggest that this dissociation arises from activation of thalamocingulate pathways and persisting deactivation of other thalamocortical arousal systems.
De architectuur van het spreken
  • Kempen
Kempen, G. 1981. De architectuur van het spreken. Interdisciplinair Tijdschrift voor Taal Tekstwetenschap 1:110-123.
  • C Bassetti
  • S Vella
  • F Donati
  • P Wielepp
  • B Weder
Bassetti, C., Vella, S., Donati, F., Wielepp, P., and Weder, B. 2000. SPECT during sleepwalking. Lancet 356:484-485. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(00)02561-7