A new view of radiation-induced cancer: Integrating short- and long-term processes. Part I: Approach

Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Biophysik (Impact Factor: 1.53). 07/2009; 48(3):263-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-009-0230-3
Source: PubMed


Mathematical models of radiation carcinogenesis are important for understanding mechanisms and for interpreting or extrapolating risk. There are two classes of such models: (1) long-term formalisms that track pre-malignant cell numbers throughout an entire lifetime but treat initial radiation dose-response simplistically and (2) short-term formalisms that provide a detailed initial dose-response even for complicated radiation protocols, but address its modulation during the subsequent cancer latency period only indirectly. We argue that integrating short- and long-term models is needed. As an example of this novel approach, we integrate a stochastic short-term initiation/inactivation/repopulation model with a deterministic two-stage long-term model. Within this new formalism, the following assumptions are implemented: radiation initiates, promotes, or kills pre-malignant cells; a pre-malignant cell generates a clone, which, if it survives, quickly reaches a size limitation; the clone subsequently grows more slowly and can eventually generate a malignant cell; the carcinogenic potential of pre-malignant cells decreases with age.

Download full-text


Available from: Igor Shuryak
  • Source
    • "Importantly, it is now recognized that cancer involves the cooption of normal cellular pathways (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Again, radiation is thought to be a " complete carcinogen " as it is both an initiator and a promoter (Fry et al., 1982; Shuryak et al., 2009). With increasing age at radiation exposure, cancer promotion and progression assume more importance due to the larger number of already-initiated, premalignant cells in older individuals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer is an important long-term risk for astronauts exposed to protons and high-energy charged particles during travel and residence on asteroids, the moon, and other planets. NASA's Biomedical Critical Path Roadmap defines the carcinogenic risks of radiation exposure as one of four type I risks. A type I risk represents a demonstrated, serious problem with no countermeasure concepts, and may be a potential "show-stopper" for long duration spaceflight. Estimating the carcinogenic risks for humans who will be exposed to heavy ions during deep space exploration has very large uncertainties at present. There are no human data that address risk from extended exposure to complex radiation fields. The overarching goal in this area to improve risk modeling is to provide biological insight and mechanistic analysis of radiation quality effects on carcinogenesis. Understanding mechanisms will provide routes to modeling and predicting risk and designing countermeasures. This white paper reviews broad issues related to experimental models and concepts in space radiation carcinogenesis as well as the current state of the field to place into context recent findings and concepts derived from the NASA Space Radiation Program. Copyright © 2015 The Committee on Space Research (COSPAR). Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015
  • Source
    • "Parameters and their assumed values in the iirp risk model in our study (Shuryak et al 2009a, 2009b, 2011). Indices i and k denote the ith voxel and kth fraction. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proton therapy confers substantially lower predicted risk of second cancer compared with photon therapy. However, no previous studies have used an algorithmic approach to optimize beam angle or fluence-modulation for proton therapy to minimize those risks. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of risk-optimized proton therapy and to determine the combination of beam angles and fluence weights that minimizes the risk of second cancer in the bladder and rectum for a prostate cancer patient. We used 6 risk models to predict excess relative risk of second cancer. Treatment planning utilized a combination of a commercial treatment planning system and an in-house risk-optimization algorithm. When normal-tissue dose constraints were incorporated in treatment planning, the risk model that incorporated the effects of fractionation, initiation, inactivation, repopulation and promotion selected a combination of anterior and lateral beams, which lowered the relative risk by 21% for the bladder and 30% for the rectum compared to the lateral-opposed beam arrangement. Other results were found for other risk models.
    Full-text · Article · Apr 2015 · Physics in Medicine and Biology
    • "First one describes the observed object as a black box while the latter tries to find its integral separate elements. Both ways are used in the context of an influence of ionising radiation on the single cells or the cell colonies – as stochastic or deterministic computational models (UNSCEAR, 1986;Moolgavkar and Luebeck, 1990;Feinendegen et al., 2000;Feinendegen et al., 2010;Brenner et al., 2001;Calabrese and Baldwin, 2003;Feinendegen, 2005;Scott et al., 2007;Scott et al., 2013;Leonard, 2008;Shuryak et al., 2009;Bogen, 2011;Leonard et al., 2011a;Leonard et al., 2011b;Scott, 2011;Scott, 2013;Tavares and Tavares, 2013;Wodarz et al., 2014). In 2011 the fully stochastic and mechanistic approach using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method was implemented to the virtual cells colony (Fornalski et al., 2011a;Fornalski et al., 2011b), and a significant development of the model was proposed afterwards (Fornalski, 2014b). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper full description of the mechanistic model of the cells irradiation is presented. The model is based on the computational Quasi-Markov Chain Monte Carlo method with a stochastic tree of probabilities and using the biophysical input. The biophysics of the cells is described by the probabilities and probability distributions provided as an input. Many biophysical aspects are implemented into the model, i.e. the adaptive response effect or the bystander effect. It results in the sigmoidal relationships for carcinogenic risk as a function of the irradiation. The methodology used makes the model universal and practical for the simulations of general processes. However, the presented theoretical model does not describe the real cells and tissues. Also the exposure geometry, type of radiation as well as microdosimetry are not taken into account in this model. The model is focused mainly on the creation of general and maximal wide mathematical description of irradiated hypothetical cells treated as complex physical systems.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2014 · International Journal of Low Radiation
Show more