Working PaperPDF Available

Killer whale status and live-captures in the waters of the Russian Far East

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Killer whale status and live-captures in the waters of the
Russian Far East
O
. A. Filatova
1
, O. V. Shpak
2
, T.V. Ivkovich
3
, E. A. Borisova
1
, A. M. Burdin
4
, E. Hoyt
5
1
Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University, Russia
2
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Russia
3
Faculty of Biology and Soil Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, Russia
4
Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Institute of Geography FEB RAS, Russia
5
Whale and Dolphin Conservation, UK
Ke
ywords: KILLER WHALE, OKHOTSK SEA, BERING SEA, DISTRIBUTION, FOOD/PREY, GENETICS,
PHOTO-ID, LIVE-CAPTURE/CAPTIVITY, MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE
Abstract
Killer whale ecology and population structure have been studied in detail in the eastern North Pacific, but much less
information is available from the western North Pacific, where live-capturing have started in recent years. In this
paper we summarize the current information about killer whales and the live-capture procedures in the western
North Pacific. We have described two killer whale ecotypes in the Russian Far East: fish-eating and mammal-eating
ecotypes similar to resident and transient killer whales found in the Northeastern Pacific.
Resident killer whales
were encountered much more frequently than transients off eastern Kamchatka, near the Commander Islands and
Kuril Islands. Transient killer whales prevailed in the western and northern Okhotsk Sea and off Sakhalin Island.
Mitochondrial control region haplotypes were different for resident and transient killer whales. Genetic analysis of
microsatellite DNA showed that resident and transient killer whales belong to reproductively isolated populations.
Values of stable isotope δ
15
N were significantly higher in transients, indicating their higher trophic level. Using the
photo-identification method, we have identified 688 resident killer whales in Avacha Gulf, Kamchatka, and more
than 800 around the Commander Islands. Some mixing occurs between Avacha Gulf, Commander Islands and the
other regions of eastern Kamchatka, but the extent of the mixing varies. We also identified 26 transient killer whales
in Avacha Gulf and 18 transient killer whales near the Commander Islands. Recapture rate of transient killer whales
in that area was low. In the western Okhotsk Sea no dedicated study has been conducted. We identified 55 transient
killer whales through the opportunistic studies. There were multiple resightings within and between seasons in the
same area and in adjacent areas. Only transient killer whales have been observed so far in this region. During the
period of 2002-2011, six killer whales were captured in different areas of the Russian Far East. In 2012-2013, seven
killer whales were captured in the western Okhotsk Sea: one young female in 2012, and six whales of unknown sex
and age in 2013. The live-capture of killer whales raises concerns because it targets the same local stock of transient
killer whales in the western Okhotsk Sea. Russian officials deny the existence of killer whale ecotypes in the
Russian Far East, and consequently do not manage fish-eating and mammal-eating killer whales as different
management units. No reliable abundance estimates of either killer whale ecotype in the Okhotsk Sea is available.
INTRODUCTION
Killer whale ecology and population structure have been studied in detail in the eastern North Pacific, but much less
information is available from the western North Pacific. In recent years live-capture of killer whales has been
undertaken in the waters of the Russian Far East. In this paper we summarize the current knowledge on the ecology
and population structure of killer whales in the western North Pacific and the available information about the live-
capture procedures.
Devoted long-term studies on killer whales (Orcinus orca) have been conducted in two main areas of the Russian
Far East: Avacha Gulf (1999-2013) and the Commander Islands (2008-2013) (e.g., Burdin et al., 2007; Filatova et
al., 2009; Ivkovich et al., 2010). Additional data have been collected in other areas since 2002 during ship-based
work and short-term field expeditions along the eastern Kamchatka coast, Kuril Islands, and western Okhotsk Sea.
ECOTYPES
We have described two killer whale ecotypes in the Russian Far East: fish-eating and mammal-eating ecotypes
(Burdin et al., 2007; Filatova et al., 2014) similar in appearance and behavior to resident and transient killer whales
found in the Northeastern Pacific (Ford et al., 1998). We have observed resident killer whales feeding on fish
SC/65b/SM07
(salmon, Atka mackerel, cod) and transient killer whales feeding on marine mammals (minke whale, fur seal, Dall’s
porpoise, bearded seal, ringed seal, and, according to interviews and recovered carcasses, bowhead whales).
Resident killer whales were encountered much more frequently than transients off eastern Kamchatka, near the
Commander Islands and Kuril Islands. Transient killer whales prevailed in the western and northern Okhotsk Sea
and off Sakhalin Island.
We have conducted genetic analysis from 92 biopsy samples (Table 1, Figure 1).
Table 1. Number of biopsy samples from resident and transient killer whales.
Resident
Transient
Karaginsky Gulf
2
0
Avacha Gulf
45
5
Commander Islands
11
2
Western Okhotsk Sea
0
27
Figure 1. Russian Far East seas. Locations of biopsy samples used for genetic and stable isotope analysis are shown
in black triangles. Shaded area indicates the location of 2012-2013 captures.
Mitochondrial control region haplotypes were different for resident and transient killer whales. Resident killer
whales from all regions had SR haplotype. Among transient killer whales, NT1 haplotype was most frequent. All
transient whales from Avacha Gulf had NT1 haplotype. In the Commander Islands, one whale had NT1 haplotype,
and another NT3 haplotype. Among western Okhotsk Sea samples, 15 had NT1 haplotype and 5 had a previously
undescribed transient haplotype.
Genetic analysis of microsatellite DNA showed that resident and transient killer whales belong to reproductively
isolated populations (Fst=0.2361, p< 0.00001). Cluster analysis (program Structure 2.3.3) also revealed clear
heterogeneity: the study samples were more likely to be divided into two groupsresident and transient (ln Pr
К=1
=
-2173; ln Pr
К=2
= -1800) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Probability of belonging of samples (n = 92) to one of two hypothetical genetic clusters. Program
Structure v 2.3.3, model «Locprior», 500000 replicas.
We conducted stable isotope analysis of 46 skin samples: 25 from Avacha Gulf, 2 from Karaginsky Gulf, 11 from
the Commander Islands and 8 from western Okhotsk Sea. The stable isotope analysis confirmed our visual
observations: values of δ
15
N were significantly higher in transients, indicating their higher trophic level (median ±
SD: residents 13.7±0.4‰, transients 16.8±0.8‰; Mann-Whitney test: U = 0, p < 0.0001).
We have studied killer whale social structure and social behavior in Avacha Gulf using photoidentification
technique. The social structure of Avacha Gulf resident killer whales was similar to the structure of residents from
Northeast Pacific (British Columbia, Washington State and Alaska). They formed social units that included maternal
relatives and were stable for at least 10 years (2002-2011). The mean size of these units was 4-8 animals. They
included up to three generations of whales and no dispersal from the maternal unit was observed.
We also found significant differences in aggregation sizes of Avacha Gulf resident (mean = 28,6) and transient
(mean = 3,6) killer whales (Mann-Whitney test: U = 22,5, p < 0.001).
In summary, we have shown that resident and transient killer whales in Russian waters represent sympatric,
reproductively-isolated populations with stable ecological and behavioral differences.
LOCAL STOCKS
Using the photo-identification method, we have identified 688 resident killer whales in Avacha Gulf, Kamchatka,
and more than 800 resident killer whales around the Commander Islands. According to the identification rate, most
of the killer whales which use Avacha Gulf are already identified to date. Only a few new identifications have been
made in recent field seasons. The level of identification of new whales in the Commander Islands is still high, which
indicates a greater number of animals using this area.
The level of site fidelity was higher in Avacha Gulf and lower in the Commander Islands. More than half of all
identified animals visited Avacha Gulf for two years or more. About 80% of killer whales identified in the
Commander Islands were encountered there only during one year.
The killer whales found in Avacha Gulf have different home ranges. We have determined that Avacha Gulf is the
core summer feeding area for 271 individual killer whales in 33 matrilineal units, roughly half the number of whales
and matrilines found in Avacha Gulf. The other half visit the Gulf occasionally and their core area is unknown.
Some mixing occurs between Avacha Gulf, Commander Islands and the other regions of eastern Kamchatka, but the
extent of the mixing varies. We have found high rates of matches between the coastal areas of eastern Kamchatka
(from Avacha Gulf to Karaginsky Gulf) apparently, killer whales in these areas belong to one community. The
number of matches between the Commander Islands and Avacha Gulf is low. In the Commander Islands we have
encountered many whales not seen anywhere else. This indicates that a significant number of killer whales come to
the Commander Islands from some non-investigated area (possibly the western Aleutian Islands). In general, the
Commander Islands appears to be a crossroads for the movements of killer whales from different regions. This
would explain the large number of identified animals and the low repeated identification rate.
We also identified 26 individuals in seven groups of transient killer whales in Avacha Gulf and 18 individuals in
eight groups near the Commander Islands. Recapture rate of transient killer whales was low. In Avacha Gulf two of
seven transient groups were encountered twice in the period from 2002-2011, and one group was observed in three
encounters. All repeated encounters with same groups happened in different years. In the Commander Islands one
group was encountered three times in two years, and one solitary transient male was encountered six times in four
years.
In the western Okhotsk Sea no dedicated study has been conducted. Our opportunistic observations during beluga
whale research resulted in mammal-eating killer whale sightings in the bays of the western part of the sea: from
Udskaya Gulf to Sakhalin Gulf. The majority of encounters occurred in Academiya Gulf, likely due to the higher
work-effort in this area. In 2011-2013, in addition to killer whale biopsy material, photographs were collected
opportunistically. We identified 55 killer whales (the analysis of the photos collected in 2013 is incomplete at
present). So far, two matches with adjacent areas have been found: one to an amateur photo taken in 2009 near
Shantar Archipelago (within 150 km from the place where we met this individual); the other one to a photo taken
by the gray whale research team off eastern Sakhalin Island in 1998 (about 500 km to the east). Within our photo-
collection, three individuals from the same group were sighted twice, in 2011 and 2012 in Academiya Gulf. Within
a season, there were multiple resightings (up to three times) of certain family groups. An unusually large
aggregation of mammal-eating killer whales was recorded in 2011: a group of over 30 individuals repeatedly visited
the western arm of Academiya Gulf (Shpak, Shulezhko, 2013).
More effort and a dedicated project are required to study the local stock or stocks of mammal-eating killer whales in
the western Okhotsk Sea. The existing information may be narrowed down to the following: 1) only mammal-eating
killer whales have been observed so far in this area; 2) they are distributed along the entire coastline from the
western coast of the sea to Sakhalin Island, 3) despite a very small number of identified animals, we have found
matches across years within the region and within adjacent regions, which suggests that the number of the local
stock (stocks) is quite limited.
KILLER WHALE CAPTURES IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST
LLC "Utrishsky Delphinariy" (also known as “Utrish Dolphinarium”) attempted the first killer whale capture off
Eastern Kamchatka in 2002, but did not succeed. The first successful capture occurred in Avacha Gulf in 2003. A
group of resident killer whales was encircled by a net. One young female was captured and at least one whale was
entangled and suffocated. The captured female died about one month later in a holding facility on the Black Sea.
In 2005-2010 LLC "Pavlovskaya Sloboda" tried to capture killer whales in the Northern Okhotsk Sea (Taujskaya
Bay). During this period capturing attempts failed (TINRO, 2014).
One killer whale was captured in 2010 by LLC "Utrishsky Dolphinariy" in the western Okhotsk Sea, but later
escaped from the sea net enclosure (according to the information from the capture team).
The Pacific Research Fisheries Center TINRO (2014) reported that during the period of 2002-2011, six killer whales
were captured in the Russian Far East. From those, only 3 killer whales mentioned above (two captured in 2003
(including the one that suffocated) and one in 2010) were officially announced.
In 2012-2013, captures were undertaken in the western Okhotsk Sea by the group of companies (LLC "White
whale", LLC "Sochinskiy Delphinariy") which are related to an umbrella company "White Sphere". They reported
the capture of one young female killer whale in 2012, and six killer whales in 2013. The sex and age of the six killer
whales captured in 2013 are not precisely known. Two killer whales (a juvenile female and young male) were
exported to China, two were reported to be sent to Moscow, and the fate of three others is unknown.
The live-capture of killer whales raises concerns because it takes place in a limited area in the western Okhotsk Sea.
All killer whales encountered there during studies belonged to the transient ecotype. In that area whales often travel
close to shore looking for seals, which makes them susceptible to being captured from small boats. The captures in
2010-2013 repeatedly targeted the same local stock of transient killer whales, although abundance estimates used to
justify the captures covered the whole Okhotsk Sea, including waters west of Kuril Islands that are frequented by
resident killer whales. TINRO have reported abundance estimates of 3,130 killer whales for the whole Okhotsk Sea
(TINRO, 2014), but they did not make a distinction between ecotypes. Russian Federal Fisheries Agency and the
relevant resource institutes refuse to recognize the existence of killer whale ecotypes in the Russian Far East, and
consequently do not manage fish-eating and mammal-eating killer whales as different management units. No
reliable abundance estimates of either killer whale ecotype in the Okhotsk Sea is available.
REFERENCES
Burdin A.M., Hoyt E., Filatova O.A., Ivkovich T.V., Tarasyan K.K. and Sato H. 2007. Status of killer whales,
Orcinus orca, in Eastern Kamchatka, Russia, based on photo-identification and acoustic studies.
Preliminary results. Paper SC/59/SM4 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, 2007
(unpublished).11pp.
Filatova O.A., Fedutin I.D., Ivkovich T.V., Nagailik M.M., Burdin A.M. and Hoyt E. 2009. The function of multi-
pod aggregations of fish-eating killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Kamchatka, Far East Russia. Journal of
Ethology 27(3):333-341.
Filatova O.A., Borisova E.A., Shpak O.V., Meschersky I.G., Tiunov A.V., Goncharov A.A., Fedutin I.D., Burdin
A.M. 2014. Reproductively isolated ecotypes of killer whales Orcinus orca in the seas of the Russian Far
East. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal (in press).
Ford J.K.B., Ellis G.M., Barrett-Lennard L.G., Morton A.B., Palm R.S., Balcomb K.C., 1998. Dietary specialization
in two sympatric populations of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in coastal British Columbia and adjacent
waters. Can. J. Zool. 76:14561471.
Ivkovich T., Filatova O.A., Burdin A.M., Sato H., Hoyt E. 2010. The social organization of resident-type killer
whales (Orcinus orca) in Avacha Gulf, Northwest Pacific, as revealed through association patterns and
acoustic similarity. Mammalian Biology 75:198-210
TINRO, 2014. Materials of total allowable catches of aquatic biological resources in the inland waters of the
Russian Federation, the territorial sea of the Russian Federation, on the continental shelf of the Russian
Federation and in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation, in the Sea of Azov and the
Caspian Sea in 2015 (with the assessment of the impact on the environment). Part 4: Marine mammals. (In
Russian) URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/tinrodocs/docs/%D0%A7%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%204.%20%
D0%9C%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8E%D1%
89%D0%B8%D0%B5%202015%20-
%20%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9D%D0%A0%D0%9E.doc?attredirects=0
Shpak O.V, Shulezhko T.S., 2013. Observations and photoidentification of an unusual group of mammal-eating
killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the Western Sea of Okhotsk. Collected Scientific Papers of KamchatNIRO
28:129-139 (In Russian).
Article
Full-text available
Two forms of killer whale (Orcinus orca), resident and transient, occur sympatrically in coastal waters of British Columbia, Washington State, and southeastern Alaska. The two forms do not mix, and differ in seasonal distribution, social structure, and behaviour. These distinctions have been attributed to apparent differences in diet, although no comprehensive comparative analysis of the diets of the two forms had been undertaken. Here we present such an analysis, based on field observations of predation and on the stomach contents of stranded killer whales collected over a 20-year period. In total, 22 species of fish and 1 species of squid were documented in the diet of resident-type killer whales; 12 of these are previously unrecorded as prey of O. orca. Despite the diversity of fish species taken, resident whales have a clear preference for salmon prey. In field observations of feeding, 96% of fish taken were salmonids. Six species of salmonids were identified from prey fragments, with chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) being the most common. The stomach contents of stranded residents also indicated a preference for chinook salmon. On rare occasions, resident whales were seen to harass marine mammals, but no kills were confirmed and no mammalian remains were found in the stomachs of stranded residents. Transient killer whales were observed to prey only on pinnipeds, cetaceans, and seabirds. Six mammal species were taken, with over half of observed attacks involving harbour seals (Phoca vitulina). Seabirds do not appear to represent a significant prey resource. This study thus reveals the existence of strikingly divergent prey preferences of resident and transient killer whales, which are reflected in distinctive foraging strategies and related sociobiological traits of these sympatric populations. 1471
Article
Full-text available
Two ecotypes of killer whales—fish-eating and mammal-eating—have been found in the seas of the Russian Far East, but confirmation of their status required genetic studies of animals with known phenotype and foraging specialization. In this paper we combine the results of the analysis of nuclear genetic markers, isotopic composition of tissues and phenetic feature (shape of the saddle patch) of killer whales from different regions of Far Eastern seas. Analysis of allelic composition of 9 microsatellite loci of the nuclear DNA divided the samples into two distinct clusters with the divergence between them high enough to indicate reproductive isolation. The content of nitrogen stable isotope 15N in tissues of whales from the first cluster was significantly lower than that of the second cluster. The difference of δ15N values between individuals from different clusters was about 3‰, which corresponds to the difference between adjacent trophic levels. Apparently, the first cluster comprised fish-eating, and the second—mammal-eating animals. The ratio of saddle patch shape types also differed between the clusters. Whales from the first cluster had five types of patch shape in different proportions, while whales from the second cluster had only “smooth” saddle patches. The differences between the clusters were statistically significant. Thus, killer whales from the seas of the Russian Far East comprise at least two reproductively isolated clusters with stable ecological and morphological differences, that is, two different ecotypes—fish-eating and mammal-eating. Different ecotypes of killer whales should be managed separately during abundance surveys, monitoring, evaluation of human impact and estimates of total allowed takes from the wild populations.
Article
Full-text available
Two forms of killer whale (Orcinus orca), resident and transient, occur sympatrically in coastal waters of British Columbia, Washington State, and southeastern Alaska. The two forms do not mix, and differ in seasonal distribution, social structure, and behaviour. These distinctions have been attributed to apparent differences in diet, although no comprehensive comparative analysis of the diets of the two forms had been undertaken. Here we present such an analysis, based on field observations of predation and on the stomach contents of stranded killer whales collected over a 20-year period. In total, 22 species of fish and 1 species of squid were documented in the diet of resident-type killer whales; 12 of these are previously unrecorded as prey of O. orca. Despite the diversity of fish species taken, resident whales have a clear preference for salmon prey. In field observations of feeding, 96% of fish taken were salmonids. Six species of salmonids were identified from prey fragments, with chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) being the most common. The stomach contents of stranded residents also indicated a preference for chinook salmon. On rare occasions, resident whales were seen to harass marine mammals, but no kills were confirmed and no mammalian remains were found in the stomachs of stranded residents. Transient killer whales were observed to prey only on pinnipeds, cetaceans, and seabirds. Six mammal species were taken, with over half of observed attacks involving harbour seals (Phoca vitulina). Seabirds do not appear to represent a significant prey resource. This study thus reveals the existence of strikingly divergent prey preferences of resident and transient killer whales, which are reflected in distinctive foraging strategies and related sociobiological traits of these sympatric populations. 1471
Article
Full-text available
From 1999-2006, a long-term study of killer whales (Orcinus orca) off eastern Kamchatka has conducted photo-identification and acoustic studies from a field station in Avacha Gulf. From 2002-2005, wide-area large ship surveys have expanded the study to other regions in the Russian Far East (RFE) including: northeast Kamchatka, Commander Islands, Chukotka, Kuril Islands and northeast Sakhalin. In this paper we mainly discuss the killer whale status on the eastern coast of Kamchatka, and give a brief review of available information regarding the killer whale status in other areas of the RFE. During the field seasons 2005-2006, a total of 434 individuals were identified in Avacha Gulf in at least three acoustic clans with different dialects. Most are resident-type fish-eating whales. Some transient-type marine mammal eating whales have also been recorded in Avacha Gulf and in other areas of the RFE. Transients as well as some residents show bites from the cookie cutter shark (Isistius brasiliensis) which may indicate long distance travel along the Asian coast or out to sea. To date, live captures have removed at least two subadult females from the Avacha Gulf residents. A live-capture quota of 6-10 killer whales in the RFE has been granted every year since 2002 (8 for 2007) although data remain inadequate to support this. The conflict between whales and fishermen in the Sea of Okhotsk due to killer whale depredation merits further study.
Article
Full-text available
In fish-eating North Pacific killer whales, large multi-pod aggregations of up to 100 animals often occur. These aggregations are thought to be reproductive gatherings where mating between members of different pods takes place. However, killer whales are social animals, and the role of these aggregations might also be establishing and maintaining social bonds between pods. Alternatively, it is also possible that multi-pod aggregations are in some way connected with foraging or searching for fish. In this study of killer whales in the western North Pacific, we describe multi-pod aggregations quantitatively and suggest their functional role in the life of fish-eating killer whales. We show that foraging is rare in multi-pod aggregations, whether inter-clan or intra-clan, and thus they are unlikely to play an important role in cooperative foraging. Socialising occurs more frequently in inter-clan rather than in intra-clan aggregations, which suggests the higher arousal level and possible mating during inter-clan aggregations. In summary, multi-pod aggregations of Kamchatka killer whales might be both reproductive assemblages and “clubs” of some kind in which whales gather to establish and maintain social bonds.
Article
Northeast Pacific resident-type killer whales (Orcinus orca) are known to form stable associations based on kinship between maternal relatives (matrilines) with a system of vocal dialects thought to reflect kinship relationships. We analyzed association patterns and acoustic similarity to study the social organization of killer whales in Avacha Gulf (Kamchatka, Russia), in the Northwest Pacific. The resident-type killer whales of Avacha Gulf formed temporally stable units that included maternal relatives with no dispersal observed. Acoustically, the killer whale community of Avacha Gulf was characterized by a system of dialects comparable to the communities of Northeast Pacific resident-type killer whales. Different units rarely associated with each other and these associations were nonrandom. Associations at different spatial levels did not always coincide with each other and with the patterns of acoustic similarity. Associations between units could change quickly irrespective of kinship relationships. The vocal dialect of a unit, which is more stable than the association patterns between units, might better reflect the overall kinship relationships. The stability and frequency of associations between units depended on the number of mature males in a unit, which could contribute to differences in the speed of change in vocal dialects and association patterns.
Observations and photoidentification of an unusual group of mammal-eating killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the Western Sea of Okhotsk
  • O V Shpak
  • T S Shulezhko
Shpak O.V, Shulezhko T.S., 2013. Observations and photoidentification of an unusual group of mammal-eating killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the Western Sea of Okhotsk. Collected Scientific Papers of KamchatNIRO 28:129-139 (In Russian).
Materials of total allowable catches of aquatic biological resources in the inland waters of the Russian Federation, the territorial sea of the Russian Federation, on the continental shelf of the Russian Federation and in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation
TINRO, 2014. Materials of total allowable catches of aquatic biological resources in the inland waters of the Russian Federation, the territorial sea of the Russian Federation, on the continental shelf of the Russian Federation and in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation, in the Sea of Azov and the Caspian Sea in 2015 (with the assessment of the impact on the environment). Part 4: Marine mammals. (In Russian) URL: https://sites.google.com/site/tinrodocs/docs/%D0%A7%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%204.%20% D0%9C%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%8E%D1% 89%D0%B8%D0%B5%202015%20%20%D0%A2%D0%98%D0%9D%D0%A0%D0%9E.doc?attredirects=0