Loneliness and Isolation in Life-Stories of Israeli Veterans of Combat and Captivity

Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (Impact Factor: 2.31). 01/2014; DOI: 10.1037/a0036936


Loneliness holds detrimental ramifications for health and well-being. Nevertheless, loneliness references in the literature addressing combat-related trauma are few. Consequentially, the qualities and characteristics of such experiences in these posttraumatic realities remain uninvestigated empirically. In the current qualitative study we began filling this gap in the literature. We utilized thematic content analysis of life-stories of 19 combat veterans and 7 ex-POWs that have given testimony at the Israel Trauma Center for Victims of Terror and War (NATAL). Our findings suggest that the loneliness in the contexts at hand is primarily characterized by a sense of experiential isolation, rather than social, emotional, or existential. This is the sensation that due to the extraordinary nature of traumatic experiences the fulfillment of needs such as empathy and intersubjectivity may be unattainable. Integrating our findings with existing interdisciplinary literature regarding social sharing, trauma, and loneliness, we discuss implications for clinical interventions and further research. (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text


Available from: Jacob Y. Stein, Jun 05, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Loneliness may be seen as the epitome of relational deficit, and as an experience that may hold dire ramifications for health and well-being. Hence, it has become a phenomenon of growing interest in psychology, nursing, and healthcare. While loneliness literature in numerous disciplines is replete with attempts to define and conceptualize the experience, a close examination of existing conceptualizations suggests they are lacking. Moreover, while researchers demonstrate how various theoretical approaches relate to loneliness, they have yet to examine how the various approaches relate to each other. We (a) address those shortcomings and suggest that they may be attributed to adherence to a positivistic view of the experience, (b) demonstrate manners in which previous conceptualizations and their construal mechanisms may be traced to their disciplinary traditions, and (c) argue for an interpretative social-constructionistic point of view by breaking down the experience of loneliness into its fundamental components. The result is an experiential model depicting seven components essential to the experience of loneliness as it is constructed within a western interdisciplinary academic milieu: (a) a sense of isolation, (b) a relationship, (c) an experiencing self, (d) a representation of an Other, (e) a deficiency of relational need(s), (f) a sense of discrepancy, and (g) psychological pain or aversion. Interrelations among the elements, the model's utility for qualitative investigations and clinical practice, and its implications for future research investigating loneliness are discussed. For the article:
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · Journal of Constructivist Psychology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Humans are social creatures, and therefore exhibit a pervasive need for others. Hence, when benevolent human contact is scarce, this dearth may be compensated imaginatively. War captivity is an extreme example of such deprivation and one wherein dissociative hallucinations have been exhibited. Although hallucinations may serve to virtually summon benevolent others and thus provide the POW with a platform for compensation, the contents of such hallucinations have yet to be investigated. The current qualitative study is the first to examine whether the content of such hallucinations may be protective. Guided by the notion that people search for compensation in lack of companionship, testimonies of former prisoners of war (ex-POWs) were scrutinized for accounts of hallucinatory experiences. A narrative analysis was utilized in an attempt to understand the meaning of the hallucinations for the POW. Findings reveal that benevolent figures and concomitant acts of care are exhibited in war captivity hallucinatory experiences. Thus, it is argued that the content of such hallucinations may be protective. These findings are discussed in light of the literature concerning peritraumatic dissociative experiences. Additionally, attachment theory is suggested as a plausible framework for understanding these findings. Finally, limitations of the study are discussed and future researched is suggested.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2015 · Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As most research devoted to the aftermath of war captivity discusses physical and intrapersonal ramifications, the interpersonal domain is left largely underrepresented in research. Our aim in this chapter is to shed light on this realm of psychosocial deficit. Indeed, throughout this chapter we highlight the manner in which various dimensions of interpersonal pernicious and malicious conduct during captivity are weaved into a tapestry of dysfunctional interpersonal relationships in the life that is to come after repatriation. In order to accomplish this we first elaborate in some detail the ingenuity of torture and misconduct of war captivity. Next, we address multifarious dimensions of interpersonal disruption that POWs may undergo after repatriation. Throughout the chapter we provide findings from a longitudinal study that has examined such aspects in a prospective cohort of Israeli ex-POWs who fell captive in 1973 in Egypt and Syria. Concomitantly we survey various interpersonal aspects that include attachment injury, marital and familial adjustment, loneliness and betrayal following captivity. Once these dimensions of post-repatriation become evident, it is then simple to see the devastation that war captivity instills in concentric circles of interpersonal relationships: family, friend, society and state. It is from these realizations that we suggest directions for researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to work towards the mending of interpersonal bonds, the communalization of trauma, and reinstatement of trust. Hopefully with such efforts where detachment was, there attachment will once again be, and where loneliness reigned there connection will once again rule.
    Full-text · Chapter · Oct 2015