Content uploaded by Mark A D'Andrea
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mark A D'Andrea on Jun 22, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Health Risks Associated with Crude
Oil Spill Exposure
Mark A. D’Andrea, MD, G. Kesava Reddy, PhD, MHA
University Cancer and Diagnostic Centers, Houston, Texas.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human exposure to crude oil spills is associated with multiple adverse health effects
including hematopoietic, hepatic, renal, and pulmonary abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to
assess the hematological and liver function indices among the subjects participating in the Gulf oil spill
cleanup operations in comparison with the standardized normal range reference values.
METHODS: Using medical charts, clinical data (including white blood cell [WBC] count, platelet count,
hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood urea nitrogen [BUN] creatinine, alkaline phosphatase [ALP], aspartate
amino transferase [AST], alanine amino transferase [ALT], and urinary phenol) were gathered for the
subjects who were exposed to the Gulf oil spill and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 117 subjects exposed to the oil spill were included. Over 77% of subjects had WBC counts
in the mid range (6-1010
3
per
m
L), while none of the subjects hadthe upper limit of the normal range (11 10
3
per
m
L). A similar pattern was seen in the platelet counts and BUN levels among the oil spill-exposed subjects.
Conversely,over 70% of the subjects had creatininelevels toward the upper limit of the normal range and 23% of
subjects had creatinine levels above the upper limit of the normal range (>1.3 mg per dL). Similarly, hemo-
globin and hematocrit levels were toward the upper limit of normal in more than two thirds of the subjects. AST
and ALT levels above the upper limit of normal range (>40 IU per L) were seen in 15% and 31% of subjects,
respectively. Over 80% of subjects had urinary phenol levels higher than detectable levels (2 mg per L).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study support our earlier study findings in which we found that people
who participated in oil spill cleanup activities are at risk of developing alterations in hematological profile
and liver function.
Ó2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The American Journal of Medicine (2014) 127, 886.e9-886.e13
KEYWORDS: Chemical exposure; Health impact; Hematological toxicity; Hepatotoxicity; Urinary phenol
Crude oil spills are tragic environmental disasters that can
affect human health through exposure to inherent toxic
chemicals including para-phenols and volatile benzene.
1,2
Human exposure to crude oil spills can lead to deleterious
effects on many biological systems, including changes in the
hematologic, hepatic, respiratory, renal, and neurological
functions.
3,4
Recently, we investigated the adverse health
effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill exposure in sub-
jects participating in oil spill cleanup activities along the
coast of Louisiana.
5
Specifically, we assessed the hemato-
logic and hepatic markers in a cohort of oil spill cleanup
workers and the clinical findings were compared with a
group of unexposed (control) subjects. The findings of the
study revealed significant differences in blood profiles and
liver enzymes between the oil spill exposed and unexposed
cohorts, indicating health risks among subjects who partic-
ipated in the oil spill cleanup operation.
5
Because the most reported clinical biomarker findings for
both hematological and liver function indices fell within the
normal range values for exposed and unexposed groups,
concerns were raised about the study design and interpre-
tation of the study findings.
6,7
This prompted us to carry out
an additional analysis of clinical data that has been recently
reported.
5
In the analysis, we assessed the blood profile and
liver function data in comparison with the standard normal
range values among the subjects who participated in the
Funding: None.
Conflict of Interest: None.
Authorship: Both authors listed in the manuscript had access to the
data and a role in preparing the manuscript.
Requests for reprints should be addressed to G. Kesava Reddy, PhD,
MHA, University Cancer and Diagnostic Centers, 12811 Beamer Road,
Houston, TX 77089.
E-mail address: kreddy_usa@yahoo.com
0002-9343/$ -see front matter Ó2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.04.035
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY
Gulf oil spill cleanup operation. The resultant outcomes are
summarized to further facilitate the understanding of the
health impact of oil spill exposure among subjects observed
previously.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
The details of identification of the
subjects exposed to the oil spill
were described in our previous
manuscript.
5
Briefly, the subjects
exposed to the oil spill were
identified as participants in the oil
spill cleanup activities along the
coast of Louisiana. Medical charts
were reviewed by an experienced
physician. Clinical data such as
white blood cell (WBC) counts,
platelet counts, hemoglobin, he-
matocrit, blood urea nitrogen
(BUN), creatinine, alkaline phos-
phatase (ALP), aspartate amino-
transferase (AST), and alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) levels were collected and evaluated.
In addition, data on urinary phenol was also assessed as a
benzene metabolite in the oil spill-exposed subjects.
Analysis
As shown in Table 1, the average reference values were
derived from the normal range values for various indices
of hematological and liver functions and the clinical data
were processed. In addition, the normal range values were
divided into various categories and the clinical data were
analyzed. The variables included WBC and platelet
counts, as well as the levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit,
creatinine, BUN, ALP, AST, ALT, and urinary phenol.
RESULTS
This study included a total of 117 subjects who were
involved in the cleanup operations of the oil spill. Of
the 117 subjects, 104 (89%) were male and 13 (11%) were
female. The median age of the subjects was 34.0 (18-63)
years.
The findings presented in the
Figure (panel A) indicate the
outcomes of WBC, platelet
counts, and BUN levels assess-
ment in the oil spill-exposed sub-
jects. Based on the normal range
values, WBC count was averaged
at 7.2 (10
3
per
m
L) and the total
number of subjects who had WBC
counts below and above the
average value of normal range was
determined. Of the 117 subjects,
71 (61%) had WBC counts below
the average value of normal range.
Similarly, 79 (68%) of the subjects
had platelet counts below the
average value of normal range
when 276 (10
3
per
m
L) was
considered as the average value of normal range. Assess-
ment of BUN levels also indicated that 68% of the subjects
had below the average value of normal range when the
average value of normal range of BUN levels was consid-
ered to be at 15 mg per dL.
The results shown in the Figure (panel B) depict the
outcomes of serum creatinine, hemoglobin, hematocrit,
and urinary phenol levels assessment in the oil spill-
exposed subjects. Based on the normal range values,
serum creatinine levels averaged 1.0 mg per dL and the total
number of subjects who had creatinine levels above and
below the average value of normal range was determined.
Of the 117 subjects, 57 (49%) had serum creatinine levels
above the average. Similarly, 76 (65%) of the subjects had
hemoglobin levels above the average when 15 mg per dL
was considered as the average value of normal range.
Assessment of hematocrit levels indicated that 65% of the
subjects had levels above the average value of normal range
when the average value of normal range of hematocrit levels
was considered to be at 44 mg per dL. Similarly, 93 (79%)
of the subjects had urinary phenol levels above the average
value of the normal range when 2.0 mg per L was consid-
ered as the average value of the normal range.
The findings presented in the Figure (panel C) reveal the
outcomes of liver function enzymes such as AST, ALT, and
ALP levels assessment in the serum of oil spill-exposed
subjects. Based on the normal range values, AST and
ALT levels in the serum were averaged at 20 IU per L, and
the total number of subjects who had AST or ALT levels
above and below the average was determined. Of the 117
subjects, 84 (72%) had serum AST levels above the average
of the normal range. Similarly, 89 (76%) subjects had serum
Table 1 Normal Range Values for Various Indices
Parameter
Normal
Range Value
Optimal (Average)
Normal Value
WBC (10
3
per
m
L) 4.0-10.5 7.25
Platelets (10
3
per
m
L) 140-415 276
Hemoglobin (g per dL) 12.6-17.7 15
Hematocrit (%) 37.5-51.0 44
BUN (mg per dL) 6-24 15
Creatinine (mg per dL) 0.76-1.27 1.0
ALP (IU per L) 25-150 88
AST (IU per L) 0-40 20
ALT (IU per L) 0-40 20
Beta-2 macroglobulin (mg per L) 0.6-2.4 1.5
Urinary phenol (mg per L) 0-trace 2
ALP ¼alkaline phosphatase; ALT ¼alanine aminotransferase; AST ¼
aspartate aminotransferase; BUN ¼blood urea nitrogen; IU per L ¼
International Units per liter; WBC ¼White blood cells.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Crude oil spills are tragic environmental
disasters that have high potential to
affect human health.
The results of this study indicate that
humans exposed to crude oil spill have a
risk of developing hepatic or blood-
related disorders.
The hematological and hepatic alter-
ations include altered platelet counts,
serum creatinine, urinary phenol, and
liver function enzymes.
D’Andrea and Reddy Health Risks from Oil Spill Exposure 886.e10
ALT levels above the average of the normal range.
Conversely, only 29% of the subjects experienced serum
ALP levels above the average when 88 IU per L was
considered as the average value of the normal range.
The outcomes were compared with the normal range
reference values that were grouped into lower-, middle-, and
upper-limit ranges in addition to the above-normal range. The
results presented in Tables 2 and 3indicate the outcomes on
Figure Changes in biological markers in subjects involved in the Gulf oil spill cleanup
operation. (A) Changes in white blood cell (WBC) counts, platelet counts, and blood urea
nitrogen (BUN) levels. (B) Changes in serum creatinine, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and
urinary phenol levels. (C) Changes in liver function enzymes such as aspartate amino-
transferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels.
Table 2 Blood Profile with Various Indices in Subjects (n ¼117) Involved in Oil Spill Cleanup Activity
WBC (10
3
per
m
L) Platelets (10
3
per
m
L) BUN (mg per dL)
Count n Count n Level n
<5.0 14 (12.0%) <200 23 (19.7%) <11.0 33 (28.2%)
6.0-<8.0 50 (42.7%) 200-<250 36 (30.8%) 11.0-<15.0 46 (39.3%)
8.0-<10.0 40 (34.2%) 250-<300 35 (29.9%) 15.0-<20.0 32 (27.4%)
10.0 -<11.0 13 (11.1%) 300-<400 23 (19.7%) 20.0-<24.0 6 (5.1%)
11.0 0 (0.0%) 400 0 (0.0%) 24.0 0 (0.0%)
BUN ¼blood urea nitrogen; WBC ¼white blood cells.
886.e11 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 127, No 9, September 2014
blood profiles and urinary phenol levels in subjects involved
in the oil spill cleanup operations. Over 77% of the subjects
had WBC counts in the mid range (6-10 10
3
per
m
L), while
none of the subjects had upper limits of the normal range
(11 10
3
per
m
L). A similar pattern was seen in the
platelet counts and BUN levels among the oil spill-exposed
subjects. However, nearly one third of subjects had BUN
levels less than the lower limit (11 mg per dL) of the normal
range. Conversely, over 70% of the subjects had creatinine
levels toward the upper limit of the normal range and 23% of
subjects had creatinine levels above the upper limits of the
normal range (>1.3 mg per dL, Table 3). Similarly,
hemoglobin levels were raised toward the upper limit of the
normal range (>15 g per dL) in more than two thirds of the
subjects. Hematocrit levels were also in the upper limit of
the normal range in over 50% of the subjects. Over 80% of
the subjects had urinary phenol levels more than detectable
levels (2 mg per L) and 21% of the subjects had urinary
phenol levels >10 mg per L (Table 3).
The findings presented in Table 4 show the levels of the
hepatic enzymes such as AST, ALT, and ALP in the serum
of the subjects involved in oil spill cleanup operations. AST
levels above the normal range (>40 IU per L) were seen in
approximately 15% of the subjects. Similarly, ALT levels
above the normal range (>40 IU per L) values were seen
in approximately 31% of the subjects. Conversely, none
of the subjects had ALP levels above the normal range
(>150 IU per L) values.
DISCUSSION
In a previous study, we evaluated the health effects of the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill exposure in a cohort of oil spill
cleanup workers.
5
The study found that the blood profiles
and hepatic enzymes were significantly altered in subjects
exposed to the oil spill compared with the unexposed sub-
jects. Because the standard reference values have a wide
range for the indices, a follow-up study was undertaken to
assess the outcomes with respect to the standard reference
values. Specifically, the outcomes were compared with the
average value of the normal range values of each parameter.
Further, the outcomes were compared with the normal range
reference values that were grouped into lower-, middle-, and
upper-limit ranges in addition to the above-normal range.
The findings of the study indicate that subjects who
participated in the oil spill cleanup operations experienced
changes in their blood profiles and hepatic enzymes. The
study findings indicated that about 60%-70% of subjects
exposed to the oil spill had WBC and platelet counts as well
as BUN levels below the average normal reference value.
Conversely, 50%-65% of subjects exposed to the oil spill
had creatinine, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels above the
average normal reference value. Urinary phenol levels were
also found to be above the average normal reference value in
approximately 80% of oil spill-exposed subjects. Similarly,
liver function enzymes such as AST and ALT were found to
be above the average normal reference value in over 70% of
oil spill-exposed subjects. Thus, these findings support our
earlier study findings in which we found that subjects who
participated in the oil spill cleanup activity are at an
increased risk of developing hematological and liver func-
tion abnormalities.
5
The abnormality of various biological markers in sub-
jects who are involved in oil spill cleanup operations is
further evidenced by the changes in various indices
including creatinine, hemoglobin, hematocrit, liver function
Table 3 Blood Profile and Urinary Phenol in Subjects (n ¼117) Involved in Oil Spill Cleanup Activity
Creatinine (mg per dL) Hemoglobin (g per dL) Hematocrit (%) Urinary Phenol (mg per L)
Level n Level n Level n Level n
<0.80 11 (9.4%) <13.0 21 (17.9%) <40 11 (9.4%) 0 10 (8.5%)
0.8-<0.9 22 (18.8%) 13.0-<15.0 20 (17.1%) 40-<45 42 (35.9%) <2.0 13 (11.0%)
0.9-<1.0 27 (23.1%) 15.0-<16.0 60 (51.3%) 45-<50 56 (47.9%) 2.0-<5.0 38 (32.5%)
1.0-<1.3 30 (25.6%) 16.0 16 (13.7%) 50 8 (6.8%) 5.0-<10.0 31 (26.5%)
1.3 27 (23.1%) N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.0 25 (21.4%)
Table 4 Liver Function Enzymes in the Serum of Subjects (n ¼117) Involved in Oil Spill Cleanup Activity
AST (IU per L) ALT (IU per L) ALP (IU per L)
Level n Level n Level n
<20 33 (28.2%) <20 28 (23 .9%) <60 27 (23.1%)
20-<30 49 (41.9%) 20-<30 38 (32.5%) 60-<80 48 (41.0%)
30-<40 18 (15.4%) 30-<40 15 (12.8%) 80-<100 23 (19.7%)
40 17 (14.5%) 40 36 (30.8%) 100 19 (16.2%)
ALP ¼alkaline phosphatase; ALT ¼alanine aminotransferase; AST ¼aspartate aminotransferase.
D’Andrea and Reddy Health Risks from Oil Spill Exposure 886.e12
enzymes (AST and ALT), and urinary phenol. The results
show that over 15% of subjects experienced some of these
biomarker indices over the upper limit of the normal refer-
ence range, and over 50% of subjects had the indices toward
the upper limit.
Overall, the findings indicate that the subjects were not
affected uniformly by the oil spill exposure. This could be
due to the differences in duration and intensity of exposure,
protective equipment, preexisting health conditions, use of
medications, and the differential immunity to the toxic
chemicals of the oil spill. In addition, subjects’age may
have contributed to the variations in findings observed in the
study. Nonetheless, the findings of the study suggest that
subjects involved in oil spill cleanup operation are at an
increased risk of developing health-related sequelae and
support our earlier findings reported in the previous article.
5
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are thankful to Lingamanaidu V. Ravichandran,
PhD, for critical review of the manuscript and for providing
medical writing support, and to Pradheeth Reddy for his
work in editing and proofreading the manuscript.
References
1. Solomon GM, Janssen S. Health effects of the Gulf oil spill. JAMA.
2010;304:1118-1119.
2. Merhi ZO. Gulf Coast oil disaster: impact on human reproduction. Fertil
Steril. 2010;94:1575-1577.
3. Goldstein BD, Osofsky HJ, Lichtveld MY. The Gulf oil spill. N Engl J
Med. 2011;364:1334-1348.
4. Diaz JH. The legacy of the Gulf oil spill: analyzing acute public health
effects and predicting chronic ones in Louisiana. Am J Disaster Med.
2011;6:5-22.
5. D’Andrea MA, Reddy GK. Health consequences among subjects
involved in Gulf oil spill clean-up activities. Am J Med. 2013;126:
966-974.
6. Wickliffe JK, Wilson MJ, Lichtveld MY. Major Concerns About Study
Design and Clinical Biomarker Interpretation. Am J Med. 2014;127(9):
e21-e22.
7. Piacentino J, Silver S, Bernard B, DeBord DG, Funk R, Decker J.
Study methodology prevents interpretation of findings in workers
involved in Gulf oil spill cleanup activities. Am J Med. 2014;127(9):
e25-e26.
886.e13 The American Journal of Medicine, Vol 127, No 9, September 2014