ArticlePDF Available

What happiness at work is and how to use it

Emerald Publishing
Industrial and Commercial Training
Authors:

Abstract

Purpose – Change management, organizational, team and leadership development is often conducted through frameworks that do not meet expectations. This paper aims to look at how the science of happiness at work delivers strategic outcomes when used in a bottom-up and top-down approach. Design/methodology/approach – While the idea that happiness is an important concept outside work is now prevalent, there is little research or practice to show how it can be used to drive organizational success or deliver return on investment. The case study shows how to deploy the approach in an organization-wide strategic intervention. Findings – The science of happiness at work delivers return on investment and strategic outcomes when properly implemented. Practical implications – This new approach is a powerful methodology which offers traction at individual, team and organizational level: it opens up a different evaluation and development methodology that positively fast-tracks change and growth. Social implications – There is huge potential for making teams and organizations better places to work by using a simple, practical and aligned framework rooted in something that matters intuitively to everyone. Originality/value – This paper provides an understanding of the theory and application of the science of happiness at work. It shows how strategic issues can be addressed within a short space of time and highlights the benefit of an approach which encompasses personal, social and organizational issues simultaneously.
iOpener Institute for People and Performance™
The Old Bakehouse 2 South Parade Oxford OX2 7JL UK
T + 44 (0) 1865 511522 F +44 (0) 1865 552918 E info@iopenerinstitute.com
©iOpener Institute 2014
www.iopenerinstitute.com
An iOpener case study
Happiness at Work. That short phrase can sound pretty flaky taken in isolation. But research and
scholarship are showing time and again
i
just what an important subject this for driving top line growth and
bottom line results. And how deeply underestimated it has been
ii
.
Why happiness at work matters?
The iOpener Institute based in Oxford UK has run an extensive, rigorous and robust research program since
2005 into what everyone is increasingly called the Science of Happiness at Work. And our empirical data
has found that a happy worker is a high-performing one
iii
. The happiest employees:
Take one tenth the sick-leave of their least happy colleagues
Are six times more energized
Intend to stay twice as long in their organizations
Are twice as productive
Let’s look at this last statistic in more detail.
The data we’ve gathered from 41,000 respondents shows that employees who are happiest at work report
being “on task” 80% of their working week. That’s four days a week. It would be impossible for anyone to
be on task 100% of the time: it would be unrealistic as we need to chat and connect. Water cooler and
coffee moments matter as any leader, manager or employee knows. But we also get stuck when laptops
crash, when others are ill, when minds get changed and stuff suddenly pops up which temporarily derails
us. So 80% time on task is pretty good.
On the other hand employees who are really unhappy at work spend only 40% of their time on task. That’s
two days a week. And it represents a huge cost to any organization. In effect an organization is losing
about 100 days’ work – or about 3.5 months for every really unhappy employee. So the data is presenting
some really interesting metrics-led facts about the cost of unhappiness at work.
What is happiness at work?
So how do we define happiness at work? Our definition is that “it is a mindset which enables action to
maximize performance and achieve potential”, so it’s a simple yet practical definition which applies to an
individual, a team or an organization. But the key focus here is this mindset: everyone knows that
approaching something in a positive manner is more likely to get results than doing the opposite. It’s
common sense. Yet common sense seems not to be so common when it comes to organizations.
Of course the highs that happiness in the traditional lay sense bring are important too and they also fall
within our model. These short bursts of positive emotion which lasts up to 10 seconds, tell us to keep going
because we derive personal enjoyment from the activity. But they this isn’t the objective of the approach.
The objective of what we do is to create sustainable and enduring change through people, because it’s
people who deliver results, not programs or emotions.
iOpener Institute for People and Performance™
The Old Bakehouse 2 South Parade Oxford OX2 7JL UK
T + 44 (0) 1865 511522 F +44 (0) 1865 552918 E info@iopenerinstitute.com
©iOpener Institute 2014
www.iopenerinstitute.com
At the iOpener Institute, Headquartered in Oxford, UK and located in the USA, Dubai, Germany, the
Netherlands, USA, Mexico, Israel and South Africa, we help organizations with their people strategy and
implementation, so that business critical employees can be at and contribute their best. That’s what drives
high performing workplaces. Doing this in a metrics-led, outcomes-oriented practice ensures return on
investment of any interventions.
What’s the model we use?
For us happiness at work is based on a researched-based
iv
and practitioner-driven model. The Performance-
Happiness Model is made up of 5 important components, which we know as the 5Cs. They are:
Contribution which is about what you do
Conviction is your short-term motivation
Culture is your feeling of fit
Commitment is your long-term engagement
Confidence is your self-belief
These are all interlocked, working as an ecosystem which means that they have a strong impact on each
other. Trust and Pride in an organization and Recognition back from it help form the context in which the
5Cs are operationalized. And, to be happy at work, an individual must have a sense of achieving their
potential, which is why it lies at the heart of the model.
©iOpener Institute for People and Performance 2011
What leaders need to understand is how to create that context of pride, trust and recognition, then it’s
more likely that their team members will be able to deliver on the 5Cs.
iOpener Institute for People and Performance™
The Old Bakehouse 2 South Parade Oxford OX2 7JL UK
T + 44 (0) 1865 511522 F +44 (0) 1865 552918 E info@iopenerinstitute.com
©iOpener Institute 2014
www.iopenerinstitute.com
How is this different from engagement?
While we acknowledge that there is some over-lap between both the Science of Happiness at Work and
engagement (whatever definition you use), we can see from our data that there are some important
differences. For example senior leaders and general managers frequently report that they are highly
engaged at work but they are not happy. We hypothesize that this is because they often also show high
levels of Conscientiousness (NEO-PI-3) and therefore invest heavily in their work regardless of mindset.
Second, we take a fundamentally different philosophical position from practitioners and academics who
focus on engagement. Typically engagement is held to be a manager’s responsibility; we believe that
individuals not managers are responsible for their own happiness at work.
Third, we believe in the power of language to create culture. Happiness is a word that everyone uses: when
would you go home to your partner and talk about an ‘engagement’ issue inside or outside work? You
wouldn’t. If we are to encourage authenticity and transparency we need to adopt a language that reflects
this.
So how is the approach useful to organizations?
How to use the approach? A case study
An organization came to us with a big strategic problem about 18 months ago. They were having trouble
retaining business critical employees and this was having a devastating effect on their ability to grow. They
simply couldn’t take on more client work and were in danger of over-trading. Internally there were
problems scoping projects, meetings milestones and delivering quality outcomes for their clients. The
business was simply unable to expand or grow because they were losing talent fast. That meant that every
team was pretty much in permanent crisis, so our goal was to help them improve this turnover number.
So we:
Assessed the whole organization using our research-driven tool, the iOpener People and
Performance Questionnaire (iPPQ).
Analyzed the data to see what worked and what could work better both at a team and
organizational level.
Ran focus groups to flesh out some of the internal issues which were hampering growth.
Coached the board and senior leaders using our proprietary 360 tool which aligns with individual
iPPQ reports.
Ensured that the people strategy was aligned with the organizational strategy.
Re-aligned some of the HR processes to ensure that they were based on what worked well and
what could work better.
Helped leaders to implement the refreshed and realigned HR processes.
Worked with HR to plan then deliver leadership development aligned with the Science of Happiness
at Work.
Ensured knowledge transfer into the organization so that HR, leaders and managers could be self-
sustaining.
iOpener Institute for People and Performance™
The Old Bakehouse 2 South Parade Oxford OX2 7JL UK
T + 44 (0) 1865 511522 F +44 (0) 1865 552918 E info@iopenerinstitute.com
©iOpener Institute 2014
www.iopenerinstitute.com
Found champions for every team so that the approach would remain alive and at top-of-mind.
Re-assessed the organization.
What issues did we face during implementation?
During this time the organization went through significant change in terms of ownership with all the knock-
on consequences in terms of delivering a large-scale intervention. In addition there were, as always, a few
leaders who are not ready for embracing new ways of working or leading others. Senior leaders who aren’t
prepared to get behind an initiative create risk which needs managing and addressing because employees
always take their cue from the top.
What was key to overall project success?
Access to, support from and the attitude of the CEO was a critical success factor. This CEO had an intrinsic
and unshakeable belief that the approach was absolutely the right thing for this knowledge-based
professional services organization. And we see that in our data too: knowledge-workers who unhappy at
work create much more instability and risk because they can so easily jeopardize projects they are involved
with.
A second important key to success was that leaders could very quickly see the immediate difference that
positively-oriented processes and conversations made. This isn’t to say that they shied away from the
tougher conversations: on the contrary. A large part of happiness at work consists of doing difficult things
and this includes giving negative feedback when needed. And a core part of the leadership development
process included helping those leaders coach team members and grow their willingness and skill in offering
development feedback.
A third core factor that helped deliver success was ensuring that we were working bottom-up and top-
down simultaneously. This meant that everyone could quickly see that things were starting to happen and
changes were being implemented.
So what were the outcomes?
When the project started, turnover of business critical employees was running at 25%. Over 15 months, this
halved to 12.5%. Not only has this reduction created much more stability and a platform for growth, but of
course the recruitment costs to the organization have fallen dramatically. What matters more is the
intangible effect on the organization’s social networks. Real-time relationships and therefore trust within
and between teams has increased greatly because there is a much greater sense of stability and progress.
A further positive outcome is that the language of the organization has changed. Employees and leaders
are using the terminology of the Science of Happiness at Work. This means that conversations are easier
because there is a framework and language where before there wasn’t. And that means it’s much easier to
have new, deeper and potentially more meaningful interactions. When the shape of language changes you
open up different conversations, cultures and outcomes. And to do that through a positive approach
creates incredible cohesion - which is something that all organizations need in today’s uncertain world.
iOpener Institute for People and Performance™
The Old Bakehouse 2 South Parade Oxford OX2 7JL UK
T + 44 (0) 1865 511522 F +44 (0) 1865 552918 E info@iopenerinstitute.com
©iOpener Institute 2014
www.iopenerinstitute.com
For more about the iOpener Institute please visit www.iopenerinstitute.com; if you would like to try the
short report, go to http://bit.ly/1bWL9fy. And look out for the next Global Happiness at Work Survey in the
Wall St Journal.
i
Boehm, J.K. & Lyubomirsky, S., 2008, Journal of Career Assessment; 16; 101 “Does Happiness Promote Career
Success?”
ii
Fisher C., Happiness At Work, 2010, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12;4
iii
Pryce-Jones, J. & Lutterbie S. 2010, Why leveraging the Science of Happiness at Work Matters: the happy and
productive employee. Assessment & Development Matters, 2;4
iv
Lutterbie S.J. & Pryce-Jones J., 2013, Managing Happiness at Work, Assessment and Development Matters 5;2
Article
Purpose The significant role of universities in generating and diffusing new knowledge in the interest of society has positioned faculty as knowledge creators. The present study contributes to the domain of positive psychology by heeding the happiness call in academia. The research intends to develop and validate a scale for measuring happiness at work (HAW) for knowledge creators. Design/methodology/approach The study is systematically designed across a series of four independent studies: (1) Dimensionality and item analysis, (2) scale purification, (3) scale refinement and nomological validation and (4) generalizability. Additionally, common method bias (CMB) was checked utilizing the marker variable technique. Findings HAW has been established as a second-order reflective-reflective construct with six factors, namely work satisfaction, self-directedness, self-love, positive thinking, positive social relationships and work-family balance. The nomological validity and generalizability of the scale have also been established. Research limitations/implications The study is an attempt to address an important topic of HAW among knowledge creators. By conceptualizing HAW as a combination of intraindividual and organizational factors, this study offers a comprehensive measure of HAW that was previously absent in the literature. The results of the study will assist management in making strategic decisions to ensure the HAW of knowledge creators. Originality/value Knowledge creators’ happiness is a major concern in academia and has received little attention till date. The primary contribution of this study is the conceptualization and development of a validated scale for measuring knowledge creators’ HAW. A valid and reliable scale for measuring HAW would enable researchers to gain fresh perspectives on the essence, attributes and quantification of this particularly noteworthy construct.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose This study presents a systematic review of “employee happiness” research from 1991–2023. In this way, this study aims to critically appraise the existing literature, and synthesize themes, thereby, paving a clearer understanding of the construct, along with providing the future research agenda. Design/methodology/approach By adopting a systematic approach, this study followed scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews for article selection. A total of 57 articles were finally chosen after a careful examination from 110 selected journals. Findings The current study identified three major themes after evaluating the selected literature on Employee happiness: (1) work, family and personal blend, (2) organizational support, and (3) Ebullience sentiment. Amidst an ambiguous usage of several related constructs in employee happiness research, the review provided a clear definition of “employee happiness” along with proposing crucial research directions. Originality/value There is a lack of systematic reviews on employee happiness in the existing literature. Thus, by far, this effort is one of the earliest endeavors that researchers undertook toward understanding employee happiness.
Article
Full-text available
Feeling happy in the teaching process plays a crucial role in supporting students. When teachers are happy, it not only directly impacts their performance but also affects the psychological development of students. Using the method of testing the happiness scale developed by (Phan Thi Mai Huong., 2019), which considers several factors connected to negative emotions, positive emotions, and job satisfaction and value. We surveyed over 360 high school teachers in Da Nang City and QuangNam province. The results showed that high school teachers over the age of 50 have a higher sense of happiness compared to those under 30. Female teachers have a higher level of satisfaction and sense of value in their work than male teachers. Based on these findings, we propose several measures to improve the sense of happiness among high school teachers. Received: 10 August 2024 / Accepted: 27 October 2024 / Published: 05 November 2024
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of workplace spirituality on psychological well-being (PWB). In addition, this study investigates the mediating role of workplace happiness and explores how psychological hardiness moderates the relationship between spirituality and PWB. Design/methodology/approach This study used a two-wave, self-reported quantitative approach focusing on millennials. Data were gathered from 416 participants through structured questionnaires. Regression analysis and bootstrapping techniques were used to investigate the moderated mediation models. Findings The bootstrapped 95% confidence interval for the indirect effects did not include zero, indicating that workplace happiness mediates the relationship between workplace spirituality and PWB. Furthermore, the moderated mediation model revealed that happiness also mediates the relationship between spirituality and PWB, particularly when millennials exhibit low levels of psychological hardiness. Research limitations/implications As millennials make up a significant portion of today's workforce, tapping into the inner resource of spirituality can enhance PWB. Individuals with happy, resilient, clear and receptive minds are more inclined toward achieving well-being. Originality/value This study explores the emerging concepts of workplace spirituality, PWB, workplace happiness and psychological hardiness, focusing specifically on their impact on the well-being of millennials in the workplace, an area that has been relatively under-researched.
Article
This study aim to compare the happiness at work levels of employees in three different sectors: health, education and security, to determine the effect of perceived organizational support on happiness in all three sectors, and to investigate whether the happiness level of employees differs according to professional and demographic variables. Ethical approval was obtained from the approved by the Batman University Ethics Committee (date: 04.01.2023; decision no: 2023/01-38). This study utilised a cross-sectional design. The shortened Happiness at Work Scale and Perceived Organizational Support Scale were used as data collection tools. A total of 1114 employees participated in the study. In the study, the level of happiness at work, were found to be significantly lower in the health sector than those in the education and security sector (p
Article
Full-text available
Kepercayaan diri merupakan salah satu faktor terpenpenting dalam individu untuk meningkatkan performa dan yakin akan kemampuan diri sendiri. Terdapat banyak faktor yang membentuk kepercayaan diri, namun secara garis besar percaya diri seorang individu dipengaruhi oleh faktor eksternal dan faktor internal. Berdasarkan data awal yang dilakukan oleh tenaga outsourcing di PT. Samudera Indonesia cabang Makassar beberapa diantara mereka merasa kurang yakin dan percaya pada kemampuan dan diri mereka sendiri. Beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi kepercayaan diri mereka adalah status pegawai yang tidak tetap, posisi, tekanan dari orang-orang disekitar, serta kurang yakin dengan potensi yang dimiliki. Untuk meningkatkan percaya diri tenaga outsourcing maka dilakukan pelatihan dengan judul Trust Your Self by Writing On The Paper dimana tujuan dari pelatihan ini adalah meningkatkan kepercayaan diri mereka melalui menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan powerfull sehingga mereka menemukan solusi untuk setiap tantangan yang dihadapi dari solusi yang mereka buat sendiri. Untuk pengukuran menggunakan skala kepercayaan diri yang diadaptasi dari teori kepercayaan diri Lautser dengan total 18 aitem. Data yang diperoleh tidak terdistribusi normal sehingga menggunakan uji hipotesis nonparamterik yaitu menggunakan uji paired sample t test mengukur perbedaan hasil pre-test dan post-test menggunakan software SPSS versi 25. Hasil pengabdian menunjukan kepercayaan diri melalui pelatihan Trust Your Self by Writing On The Paper memberikan bukti dapat meningkatkan kepercayaan diri tenaga outsourcing PT. Samudera Indonesia.
Article
Full-text available
Happiness in the form of pleasant moods and emotions, well-being, and positive attitudes has been attracting increasing attention throughout psychology research. The interest in happiness has also extended to workplace experiences. This paper reviews what is known about the definition, causes and consequences of happiness at work, drawing also on insights from the expanding positive psychology literature on happiness in general. Many discrete organizational behavior constructs arguably belong to a larger family of happiness-related constructs, and share some common causes and consequences. Happiness at work includes, but is far more than, job satisfaction. A comprehensive measure of individual-level happiness might include work engagement, job satisfaction, and affective organizational commitment. Aspects of happiness have been (and should be) conceptualized and measured at multiple levels, including transient experiences, stable person-level attitudes, and collective attitudes, and with respect to multiple foci, such as discrete events, the job, and the organization. At all levels, there is evidence that happiness has important consequences for both individuals and organizations. Past research has tended to underestimate the importance of happiness at work.
Article
For the past five years we have been running a research project about happiness at work. Our aim was to investigate the old question: is the happy worker a productive one too? We began with protocols, focus groups, interviews and three separate studies (Edmunds & Pryce-Jones, 2009) and have now gathered responses from more than 5,000 employees. This article illustrates the key findings so far.
Article
Past research has demonstrated a relationship between happiness and workplace success. For example, compared with their less happy peers, happy people earn more money, display superior performance, and perform more helpful acts. Researchers have often assumed that an employee is happy and satisfied because he or she is successful. In this article, the authors review evidence in support of an alternative hypothesis—namely, that happiness is a source of why particular employees are more successful than others. To this end, the authors consider evidence from three types of studies—cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental—that relate happiness to various work outcomes. Taken together, the evidence suggests that happiness is not only correlated with workplace success but that happiness often precedes measures of success and that induction of positive affect leads to improved workplace outcomes.
Article
The five-factor model of personality is a hierarchical organization of personality traits in terms of five basic dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience. Research using both natural language adjectives and theoretically based personality questionnaires supports the comprehensiveness of the model and its applicability across observers and cultures. This article summarizes the history of the model and its supporting evidence; discusses conceptions of the nature of the factors; and outlines an agenda for theorizing about the origins and operation of the factors. We argue that the model should prove useful both for individual assessment and for the elucidation of a number of topics of interest to personality psychologists.
Managing happiness at work”, Assessment and Development Matters
  • S J Lutterbie