Community colleges have been balancing multiple missions for more than half a century. The Truman Commission's recommendation that community colleges should serve "the total post-high school needs of the community" (President Truman's Commission on Higher Education, cited in Bogart, 1994, p. 62) paved the way to massive expansion and endless controversy. There are two important parts to this controversy. First is the potential problem of offering so many educational services that it is impossible to do any of them well. Although this has been a concern of a number of authors, the comprehensive model is now widespread (Bailey and Averia-nova, 2001; Bailey and Morest, 2004). At least as an organizational strategy, comprehensiveness has been highly resilient. The second part of the controversy is an underlying problem of the first: how much emphasis should community colleges put on vocational as opposed to academic transfer-oriented education? This debate has a very long history, not only for community colleges but for all sectors of U.S. public education. Our economy requires well-trained workers, and individuals certainly must be prepared for work. In fact, vocational education arguably occurs in all sectors of the educational system (Grubb and Lazerson, 2004). At the same time, however, we value delayed entry into the workforce because each additional year of education returns a higher salary and greater opportunity for advancement. In recent years, the baccalaureate degree has acquired increasing importance partly because of the growing gap between the earnings of those with bachelor degrees and those with no more than a high school degree (Bailey, Kienzl, and Marcotte, 2004). Furthermore, although today's high school graduates lack firm conceptualizations about their career choices or how to attain their educational goals, the vast majority claim baccalaureate degrees as their aspiration (Schneider and Stevenson, 1999; Bailey, Jenkins, and Leinbach, 2005). This chapter focuses on two aspects of the missions and roles of community colleges. On one side is the concern that community colleges are becoming vocationalized, to the detriment of other missions, particularly transfer. This perception emerged early on, with the development of comprehensiveness. Today's version of the vocationalization debate has to be expanded to include contract and continuing education. Continuing education is often noncredit and is aimed at students seeking to learn or upgrade specific job-related skills. Many community colleges have established special departments that market or repackage continuing education and other college programs to business and industry clients. These services are described as contract training, and the departments that Offer them have such names as "business training institute" or "center for business and industry." The perceived threat against community colleges in the late 1990s was that contract and continuing education would take over the focus of community colleges, diverting attention and resources away from college credit programs (Dougherty and Bakia, 2000). The second aspect of the mission debate discussed here is a concern that only recently has gained attention. This is the potential for community colleges to shift their attention away from an important constituency: low-income and disadvantaged students. With college tuitions rising sharply and increasing numbers of students seeking baccalaureate degrees, community colleges are well situated to move up the ladder in our highly stratified postsecondary system. Whereas enrollments at public four-year institutions grew by 3.5% from 1990 to 2000 (9% at all four years), public two-year enrollments increased by 14% (U.S. Department of Education [USDOE], 2003c, Table 173). Not only are more students beginning their postsecondary experiences at community colleges, but a larger proportion of these students are recent high school graduates. Community colleges are not growing at the expense of four-year colleges, but they are attracting larger numbers of young students whose parents did not attend college and who are from the middle and lower socioeconomic quintiles (Adelman, 2005). Because bachelor degrees are the educational ambition of the majority of this growing number of traditional students, community colleges have an increasing responsibility to provide postsecondary access through transfer. At the same time this is happening, tuition at both the two- and four-year levels is increasing. Although there is considerable variation across the country, state subsidies to community colleges are not keeping pace with tuition increases. This reflects the ongoing trend toward privatization in higher education, in which the cost for public education is shifting from the states to student tuition and fees. The implications of these developments are that, although community colleges need to increase their emphasis on transfer, they may be thwarted by the inability of students to afford the rapidly increasing costs of attending a four-year college during the junior and senior years. Altogether, these developments create an increasing motivation to shift institutional missions and activities toward better prepared students with more resources, resulting in relatively less emphasis on low-income and more poorly prepared students. Evidence of this is to be found in the community college baccalaureate movement, which has gained momentum in certain states over the past few years. Community colleges have also established and expanded honors programs, which focus on transfer to selective colleges. This developing image is reflected in the media, which provides evidence that the public is taking a broader view of the potential of community colleges. For example, Rolling Stone told its readers that "community colleges give you small classes and an affordable head start on some of the top universities in the country" (Featherstone, 1998, p. 87). In December, 2002, the New York Times ran a front-page article with a similar theme: "Junior Colleges Tr y Niche as Cheap Path to Top Universities" (winter, 2002). And, in 2003, USA Today ran an article about articulation agreements between Miami Dade Community College and a number of public and private institutions, reporting that "more and more, two-year institutions are serving as launching pads for the best and brightest, luring students⋯ with merit scholarships, intensive academic programs and the potential to be discovered by a big-name school" (Marklein, 2003, p. 10D). Evidence of this shift is found in the increasing proportion of traditional students attending community colleges. Between just 1993 and 2001, the proportion of public two-year students between the ages of 18 and 24 grew by 7%, so that now more than half (54%) of the students fall into this age range. In addition to traditional college students, community colleges are also increasing their share of high school students. During the same period, the proportion of students younger than 18 grew from 2.4% to 5.5%. Although the size of this population of students remains relatively small, it is considerably larger at community colleges than any other sector (1.5% of public four-year students were under 18 in 2001; USDOE, 1995, Table 171; USDOE, 2003c, Table 178). These developments increase the importance of the role of community colleges in the educational pipeline. Although at the national level we are learning about how this pipeline works (Adelman, 2005), much less is known at the institutional level. The colleges in this study collect some data about the destinations of their transfer students, but none of the colleges pursued information about what happened to their youngest students-those who started as high school students. So, to a large extent, a community college education is a private affair. Not only are students paying for it increasingly out of their own pockets, but they also take full responsibility for determining how they will use the institutions. The National Field Study indicates two major trends in community college missions. The first is the expansion and institutionalization of contract and continuing education. Although discussion about vocational education at community college often treats it as monolithic, in reality vocational education is highly diversified. Community colleges are clearly strengthening their position as service providers to business and industry, though not without some internal growing pains. The second trend involves academic education and the growing importance to community colleges of transfer. Evidence of this is found not in the rhetoric of administrators, but in student enrollment patterns and organizational structures of the colleges. The chapter concludes with a discussion about how these conflicting trends can be occurring simultaneously within the institutions and the implications for the future of community colleges. © 2006 By The The Johns Hopkins University Press. All right reserved.