Content uploaded by Nawaz Ahmad
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nawaz Ahmad on May 14, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Business Strategies, Vol.6, No. 2, 2012, pp 1-10
1
Effect of Product Packaging in Consumer Buying Decision
Nawaz Ahmad*, MohibBillo & Asad Lakhan
Greenwich University, Karachi
The study was conducted to determine which elements of product packaging are the most
significant and how they impact consumer buying behavior .Due to increasing self-service and
changing consumer lifestyles, the internet in packaging as a tool of sales promotion and
stimulator of impulsive buying behavior is growing increasingly. So packaging performs an
important role in marketing and encouraging or even sometimes discouraging the consumer from
buying a product, especially at the point of sale or at the time when a consumer is choosing from
among different brands of similar products type. This could be treated as one of the most
important factor influencing a consumer’s purchase decision. This study was conducted keeping
in view the importance of product packaging and the great impact it can make on the purchase
decision, after studying different aspects and components of packaging. It was found that the
colors of packaging is the most important and significant feature at 1%, followed by a picture or
image of the purchasing which is significant at 10%.
Keywords: packaging, elements of packaging, consumer purchases decision.
Introduction
This topic refers to the importance product packaging occupies in the consumers’ minds and how
its affects purchasing decisions, Reemphasizing the importance of perception, instead of
allowing the customer to position products independently ,marketers try to influence and shape
consumers concepts and perception through packaging.
Packaging is often the last impression the consumer or consumer will have of your
products before that final purchase decision is made, therefore, it is worth ensuring that packaging
is working as hard as possible to secure that sale this may be in the form of imagery, brand values,
products functionality or pure innovation. There are many ways in which packaging can add
value.
*nawazahmad_pk@hotmail.com
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
2
Marketers should consider a few things in order to make packaging support their brands
positioning, build competitive advantage, maintain innovations or increase their price premium,
packaging development can provide a number of business benefits including:
• Tangible representation of brand or company values
• Significant enhancement of product deliver, experiencing or enjoyment
• Increased impact at point of purchase
• New distribution channels or opportunities
Over 70% of purchase decisions are made at the shelf, since packaging of product is the first thing
that a consumer sees, it plays a vital role in differentiating a brand from competition .consumers
are strongly influence by the packaging of products that they are considering to buy. Marketers
are well aware of this fact, and go to great lengths to create packaging that will draw in consumers
and convince them to buy the product. The shift in consumer decision making means that
marketers need to adjust their spending and to view the changes place at the right time, giving
them the information and support they need to make the right decision.
Research Statement:
The aim of the study is to find out the effects of product packaging of FMCG on
consumer buying decision and to find the importance of product packaging in the sale of product.
Literature Review:
Ulrich R Orth et al. (2010) says package design is an integral part of projecting a brand
image, which is sometimes designed to convey images of high quality, while at other times
signaling affordable prices.
Abrams, E. (2010) says in “Brand Identity meets Economics of Scales,” “The carton, jar
or tube propped on that stores shelf provides the first impression of a brand’s product to a
consumer, and the brand and product packaging is critical the success of both.”
Arens (2007) says packaging is the container for a product – encompassing the physical
appearance of the container including the design, color, shape, labeling and material used.
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
3
Baker (2007) said it is worthwhile for retailer to understand factors within the retail
setting that trigger a consumer’s impulsive reactions. Retailers can help customer to find the right
products through focused Merchandising, intelligent store design and layout and other visual
merchandising, intelligent store design and layout and other visual merchandising practices, such
as product displays, packaging and signage.
Brewer (2006) found that customers learn colors associations from current brands in the
market, which lead them to prefer certain colors for various product categories. Using color as a
cue on packaging can be a potentially strong association, especially when it is unique to a
particular brand. However, people in different cultures are exposed to different color association
and develop color preferences based on their own culture’s associations. Furthermore, Brewer
(2006) found that informational elements tend to be less important than visual in low involvement
product decisions: “so graphics and color become critical”.
Gonzalez (2007) said that primary function of packaging is to protect the product against
potential damage while transporting, storing, selling and exploiting a product. Gonzalez
mentioned that consequently the role of package in marketing communications increases: it must
attract consumer’s attention and transmit adequate value of product to a consumer in the short
period right in the place of sale. Therefore, there is a necessity to explore the package and its
element in more details, in order to understand which of these elements are the most important for
a consumer purchase decision.
Hill (2005) said as individual preferences become more complex and diverse, packaging
becomes the major means of product branding, packaging also provides the more permanent
impression of product brand to the customer.
According to jugger (2008) brand purchases are being made or broken in the “final five
seconds” is a brand is not adequately supported with media advertising, packaging must plays a
greater role in the brand’s marketing.jugger (2008) said the “right” packaging solution is different
for each brand. When is important is that it works when placed next to the competition on the
shelf.
Jugger (2008)said the average British marketers contains 25,000 items and the average
shopping basket just 39 items .what this illustrates- is that today’s consumer have to scrutinize
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
4
through a vast amount of products to chose what they want – and not surprisingly they end up
ignoring most of what they pass.
Lockshin (2008) said never underestimate the importance of purchasing marketers often
measure consumer brand perceptions and ignore the pack. Yet we know form the way that
consumer from the way that consumers react to unbranded products that packaging plays a huge
role in reinforcing consumer perceptions. Packaging helps to direct the way consumer experience
a product. Yet, we spend little time researching the connection between packaging and the direct
experience of the product.
Mann (2007) also mentioned that the amount and type of information available to the
customer through the product label and package on nay product is the functions of three factors
such as government regulation, independent labeling institute and business policy.
According to Quazi (2008) consumerism is concerned with both the micro and macro
consumerist issues. The micro consumerist issues include the issues like misbranding practice,
misleading advertisement, deceptive packaging, unfair pricing etc. While the macro consumerist
issues are mainly concerned with the broader contexts like environmental pollution, health care
system, antinuclear issues etc. The micro issues of consumerism are also known as fairness on
trade practices or fairness on business practices. In this research, four well known and widely
discussed micro consumerist issues such as misleading advertisement, deceptive packaging,
customer care and unfair pricing as well as one macro issue (environmental consumerism
practice) have been taken into consideration in order to find out their effect on the consumer
purchasing behavior.
Rudh (2007) says unlike advertising exposure which can be relatively brief packaging
continues to build brand values during the extending usage of product and can drive brand equity
and loyalty Rudh (2007) said in a standard supermarket, the typical shopper passes about 300
brands per minute. This translates into less than one-tenth of a second for a single product to get
attention of the customer and spark purchase.
Schlossberg (2008) suggest that the most effective means of attracting attention to a
product is by focusing attention on product brand through the use of an appropriate color, size,
language, and picture while increasing product availability.
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
5
Sinclair (2007) says the consumer’s decision making processes is not rational in the sense
that it is objective and consistent; neither does it follow any pre-determined rational, statistical
economic patterns.
Siloyai (2006) mentioned that behavior of consumers with high involvement towards a
product category is less influenced by image and visual stimuli. In such cases, consumers need
more information and take more time to make evaluations. For instance, consumers who are more
concerned with health and nutrition are more likely to pay attention to detailed label information
of food products.
According Smith (2006), there are six variables that must be taken into consideration by
producers and designers when creating efficient package: form, size, color, graphics, material and
flavor.
Young (2008) said the most attractive or popular design is not necessarily be the most
effective one at the point of sale, because it may get lost in shelf clutter and/or fail to
communicate key messages (and a point of difference) quickly and clearly. According to Young
(2008), when labeling messages are positioned on either side of the main visual, it pulls viewers
in two different directions, and often results in some messages getting lost outside of the primary
viewing flow.
Method
We have collected data through primary sources. In conducting this study, survey
questionnaires were administered for data collection. We made a list of questions, which were
narrowed down, to a few. Then we gave out the questionnaires.
Collection of Quantitative data
Measurement and Scaling Procedure
The questionnaire was structured in the form of an ordinal scale in which respondent
evaluate only one object at a time and the 5 points itemized rating type scale ranging from (1)
strongly disagree to (5) strongly agree.
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
6
Questionnaire Design
There were 15 questions in the survey obtaining data for one variable: participants were
approached with the research questionnaire. They were given sufficient time to study the
questionnaire, ask questions and obtain clarification if necessary on issues associated with the
research and questionnaire before completion.
Response Rate
To make the filling and analysis of questionnaires easy and accurate, we used Google
Docs. Our response rate was 100% with the sample subject answering all the questions.
Sampling processes
Target Population
Our target population involves the users, deciders and buyers of FMCG products. The
users include the old and the young population. The deciders and the buyers mostly include the
house wives who are the major buyers of FMCG products.
Sample size and Technique
Sample size of 50 was taken for conducting the study. It denotes the numbers of
elements to be included in the study. Due to time constraints, the sample size chosen is small. We
have used Purposive sampling in order to float the questionnaires.
Results and Discussion
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha Cronbach’s Alpha Bases
onStandardized Items No of Items
.727 .718 7
(Source: This study)
The data of independent variables or predictors is reliable, because the value of
Cronbach's Alpha is 0.727 which is greater than 0.7. The value is also positive, so the data used
for analysis is reliable.
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
7
Model Summary
(Source: this study)
This table shows that color and picture have 51.5% interdependence with purchase
decision. Explained variations of the model are 26.5% that is significant as ANOVA F-statistics
is observed as 8.48 which is greater than 4. Furthermore, the difference between R-square and
Adjusted R-Square is less than 5%, which suggests that there is no sample error.
ANOVAf
(Source: this study)
ANOVA shows overall significance of the model and significance coefficient of
determination. As F-statistics observed is greater than 4 – then the bench mark for F-statistics
which is further endorsed by sig. value which is less than 0.01. Hence, the model is significant at
1%. Coefficients
(Source this study)
The questionnaire was developed for data collection on six variables (color, labeling,
convenience, shape, picture and quality). The purchase decision has been used as dependent
variable. Since these were multiple predictors, backward method for regression model was used
whereby four of the predictors were eliminated by the system being insignificant.
Model R R square Adjusted R
Square Std Error of
the Estimates
5 .515e .265 .234 1.263
Model Sum of
Square df Mean
Square F Sig.
5 Regression
Residual
Total
27.060
74.940
102.000
2
47
49
13.530
1.594 8.485 .001
Model Unstandardized
coefficients Standardized
coefficient T Sig Collinerity statistics
B Std Error Beta Tolerance VIF
5 (constant) 1.009 .654 1.544 .129
Color .484 .156 .399 3.108 .003 .950 1.053
picture .237 .122 .248 1.936 .059 .950 1.053
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
8
The final model contains two variables i.e. color and picture which have significant
impact on the purchase decision. Here, color is significant at 1 % as sig value is less than 0.01
whereas picture is insignificant at 10% as its sig value is less than 0.1. Furthermore, there is no
multicollinearity (interdependence amongst predictors) between color and picture as Variance
Inflationary Factor (VIF) is less than 2.
Moreover, the coefficient of colour suggests that unit increase in score of color will bring
0.484 unit increase in purchase decision whereas coefficient of picture suggests that unit increase
in score of purchase will bring 0.237 units increase in purchase decision. Comparatively speaking,
colour explains purchase decision more than picture as standardized beta coefficients for colour
(0.399) is higher than that of picture (0.248).
Most of the people think that packaging is necessary part of the product and also is
important to increase the sale though it is a cost element. Another view brought forward was that
opening of packages were not, in general, a difficult task. However, peoples are in favor of using
the packages as containers after using the goods contained in them. Similar views are also
expressed relating to the labeling of the products. The respondents are satisfied with the
information provided on the labels.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that women in general are well aware of the importance of
packaging. They want it to be attractive, easy to handle, differentiable form competitive products.
They would also like the packets that should be used for further use. Labeling is claimed to be an
important legal document as it expresses the reliability of the product.
Research into packaging has found that different packaging cues affects how a product is
perceived. Often the packaging is perceived to be part of the product, it can be difficult for
consumer to separate the two aspects such as packaging color, design, and pictures can influence
how a product is perceived.
According to our research, we found out that colour of a product’s packaging is the most
significant characteristic, followed by the picture or the image on the product packaging.
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
9
As a matter of fact, people are becoming more and more demanding; packaging has
gradually shown its important role in serving consumer by providing information and delivering
function. With its different functionality to ease and to communicate with consumers, there is no
doubt about the increasingly important role of packaging as a strategic tool to attract consumer’s
attention and their perception of the product quality.
Recommendations
Brand is important and its strategy is considered in the units. Product packaging is
valuable for brand equity, product differentiation, market segmentation, new product introduction,
pricing, promotion etc. Brand name using plan implementation must be effective in the units.
All the marketing units pay attention to good packaging. They accept that poor packaging
is one of the causes of product failure in the market. It is necessary to set packaging standards and
to implement accordingly for better protection and promotion of a product.
Basically labels describe what made it, where it was made, when it was made, what it
contains, how to use it etc. Furthermore, they believe that the consumers are properly guided by a
label to use the product. The information given in the label and its value have to be highlighted
while promoting the product in the market. It must also be more useful technically.
We do believe that culture difference does have an impact on a company’s initiatives to
design the product package. For instance, during our research, the choices of packaging colours
are quite different between the West and Far East. Thus, we think that it is important for
multinational companies to take in consideration cultural differences when they design the
product package.
References
Abrams, E. (2010). Where Brands identity meets Economies of Scale ,pacakging,design /
logistics,. 54-56.
Arens, W. (2007). Contemporary Advertising , Irwin , European journal of Marketing , 25 (3).
Baker,J. (2007). An Experimental Approach to making retail store enviromerntal decission.
journal of retailing , 68 (4), 445-460.
Effect of Product Packaging in consumer Buying Decision
10
Brewer, C. (2006). The Verbal and Visual Components of Package Design, journal of product
and brand management,Vol.9 No 1 2006, pp 56-70
Gonzalez, M.P. (2007). Pacakging as a tool for product development: Communicating value to
consumer. Journal of food distribution Research , 38 (1), 61-66.
Hill, T. (2005). Pacakging of childern,breakfast cereal: manufacturers and childeren. British Food
Journal , 104, 766-777.
Jugger, S. (2008) The power of packaging. Admap Magzine.,October 2008.
Lockshin, L. (2008). Consumer Purchasing Behaviour: What We Know and Where We are going.
Marches ET Marketing du Vin, 57, 1-30.
Mann, J. Consumerism in perespective. European Journal of Marketing , 12 (4), 253-263.
Orth et.al ., (2007). Formation of Consumer Price Expectation based on Pacakge Design:
Attractive and Quality Routes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 18(1).
Quazi, M.A. (2008). Managerial Views of Consumerism: A two country Comparision. European
Journal of marketing , 36,(1/2) 36-50.
Rundh, B. (2007). The Multi-Faceted Dimension of Pacakging , Birtish Food Journal.107 (9),
670-684.
Scholssberg, H. (2008). Effective packaging talks to consumers. Marketing News 6 .
Sinclair, C. (2007). Packing a Punch:Using Pacakging as Effective Advertising and
Communication to Build Your Bottom Line . Market Research Society, Annual
Conference .
Silayoi, P (2006). Packaging and Purchase Decisions, British Food Journal, Vol.106 No 8, 2006,
pp. 607-608.
Smith, P (2006). Marketing Communications: an Integrated Approach (4th edition). London:
Kogan Page.
Young, S (2008). Winning at Retail: Research insight to improve the packaging of children’s
products, Young Consumers, Vol. 5, Issues 1, 2008.