Background: Urbanization accelerates, meantime little is known about the importance for humans to live in natural environments. The relation between nature and mental health has been studied and documented. Theories derive from environmental psychology, now researchers seek a physiological explanation; evidence documenting why and how nature impact human health, prerequisite nature-interventions being implemented efficiently in public health work and policies. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) has been suggested as the physiological explanation, specifically the Parasympathetic nervous system (PNS).
Objective: To explore if ANS can explain the relationship between nature and human health by mapping the knowledge obtained in studies using Heart Rate Variability (HRV) to measure human reaction to nature.
Methods : A systematic review of articles published in the last 5 years, using PsycINFO, Global health, Embase, PubMed Medline, Amed, CINAHL and Web of science. Additionally, a search though most cited key articles, followed by snowballing and contact to experts and lastly alerts on databases. The PICO method was used to select studies; Healthy adults, nature, control and HRV-parameters. Eight RCT studies (n=3125) were eligible for inclusion, a Narrative Synthesis was conducted.
Results: All studies found at least one significant outcome, documenting the association between nature and ANS by reactions from PNS or the Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) or both. Real nature could be superseded by virtual nature environments. Several moderators of different categories were indentified: Duration of exposure, exercise, and ANS activity prior to exposure, stress induction, type of nature, senses exposed, personality, preferences and believes. Impact from respiration was unclear.
Discussion: The results were based on RCT´s, as cross-over trails. Limitations were; incorrect analyses, lack of blinding of outcome assessments, heterogeneity in the use of HRV-parameters, uncertainties in the interpretation of ANS activity based on HRV. Furthermore lack of possibilities to evaluate practical significance and determine cross-over effects. However enough strong evidence to state; ANS could explain nature’s impact on human health, without mutually excluding other explanations. Substantiating further research to reveal the precise influence from the moderators, develop ideal analyze methods and valid HRV-parameters. Meantime the researcher must be aware if they steer to develop an artificial substitute for nature or creation of the most efficiently real nature to initiate health benefits.
Conclusion: A convincing conclusion was the increase in the PNS initiated by viewing nature compared to build environment, documenting the suggested physiological explanation. ANS and nature challenge science to cooperate across disciplines, as more knowledge on ANS is essential, sophisticated analyze methods required and insights to environmental possibilities. This thesis gave documentation to use nature to improve health, prevent disease and identifies the complexity of investigating nature and ANS, meantime the potential to develop nature as evidence based medicine.
Figures - uploaded by
Lea NeubergAuthor contentAll figure content in this area was uploaded by Lea Neuberg
Content may be subject to copyright.