This paper examines the development of Georg Ernst Stahl’s alchemical thinking and an apparent anachronism that the complexities
of Stahlian publications introduced. Stahl’s development involves his shift from the position of an alchemical believer or
aspirant to that of a disbeliever openly critical of alchemy, and the transformation of his relationship with Johann Joachim
Becher, an important
... [Show full abstract] chemist of early modern Europe. It also involves an examination of the publishers’ interests that caused
an apparent anachronism, and the practices of publication at the time, including the introduction of academic works to the
German-reading public.