Article

Targeting Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage or Poor Functional Outcome An Analysis of the Third International Stroke Trial

Stroke (Impact Factor: 5.72). 03/2014; 45(4). DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004362
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA), despite a risk of early symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), is of net clinical benefit to acute stroke patients. We tested if predictive models could identify patients least likely to be harmed by sICH or those who gained no net benefit.
We used the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) trial data set, an international, multicenter, open treatment randomized trial of 0.9 mg/kg rtPA versus control in 3035 patients with acute ischemic stroke. We compared the discrimination and calibration of previously developed predictive models for ICH and poststroke poor outcome and developed a new model using variables selected by systematic review. We calculated the absolute and relative risk reduction of death or dependency with rtPA in patients at a low, medium, or high predicted risk of sICH or poor functional outcome.
Prediction models for sICH or poor outcome (Hemorrhage After Thrombolysis [HAT]; Sugar, Early Infarct Signs, Dense Artery, Age, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Score (SEDAN); Glucose Race Age Sex Pressure Stroke Severity [GRASPS]; Stroke Thrombolytic Predictive Instrument; Dense Artery, Rankin Score, Age, Glucose, Onset to Treatment Time, NIHSS [DRAGON]; Totaled Health Risk in Vascular Events [THRIVE]; our new model; and a model with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and age) had similar area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROCC) to predict sICH (P for difference >0.05). The simplest model (with covariates National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and age) predicted both sICH (AUROCC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68) and poststroke poor functional outcome (AUROCC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.82) similarly to complex models. There was no evidence that the effect of rtPA in patients at high predicted risk of sICH or poor functional outcome after stroke was less than in those at lower risk.
There is a clinically relevant net positive effect of rtPA in patients with acute stroke at a high predicted risk of sICH or poor functional outcome.
http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518.

2 Followers
 · 
16 Reads