ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

A great contribution on the exploration of the human mind, and the modes in which people think and behave by literally leaving aside all the constraints that were imposed to them by various social movements, are present in the Literature of the modern world, which historically begins by the ending of the 19th century. The era during which this kind of Literature is created is known as Modernism. Modernism is based on the outburst of peoples introversion, their pathological need to speak freely about their ―skeletons in the cupboard‖, to get released of their mental and spiritual xenophobia. Modernism enabled not only a detection of these deformities, but freedom to speak about them and find cures. It is Sigmund Freud, whose theories changed the way of thinking, thus the way of writing that is why Modernism transfers us to a new dimension of writing, which deals a lot with the straightforward way of writing about the truth in a truthful way. There is no doubt that David Herbert Lawrence is the icon of the Period of Modernism in British as well as the world Literature. It is Lawrence who gave directions how to cope with the difficulties of modern era. Not only does he encompass the above mentioned elements, but he goes even farther within the exploration of our Eros and Thanatos, then also with the ideals of the society in the new spheres where they happen to find themselves. He managed to put so much of his life in his books, and managed to create characters which are considered as the most completed ones in the history of Literature. So the following text is nothing but a modest try to penetrate into the inner feelings of the protagonists in his novel ―Women in Love‖. It is the
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
111
DAVID HERBERT LAWRENCE AN ICON OF
MODERNISM
Vlera Ejupi, PhD
Department of English Language, Faculty of Languages, Cultures and
Communications. South East European University Tetova, Macedonia
Liljana Siljanovska, PhD
Department of International Communication, Faculty of Languages, Cultures
and Communications, South East European University Tetova, Macedonia
Arburim Iseni, PhD
Department of English Language and Literature. Faculty of Philology,
State University of Tetova, Tetova, Macedonia
Abstract
A great contribution on the exploration of the human mind, and the
modes in which people think and behave by literally leaving aside all the
constraints that were imposed to them by various social movements, are
present in the Literature of the modern world, which historically begins by
the ending of the 19th century. The era during which this kind of Literature
is created is known as Modernism. Modernism is based on the outburst of
peoples introversion, their pathological need to speak freely about their
―skeletons in the cupboard‖, to get released of their mental and spiritual
xenophobia. Modernism enabled not only a detection of these deformities,
but freedom to speak about them and find cures. It is Sigmund Freud, whose
theories changed the way of thinking, thus the way of writing that is why
Modernism transfers us to a new dimension of writing, which deals a lot with
the straightforward way of writing about the truth in a truthful way. There is
no doubt that David Herbert Lawrence is the icon of the Period of
Modernism in British as well as the world Literature. It is Lawrence who
gave directions how to cope with the difficulties of modern era. Not only
does he encompass the above mentioned elements, but he goes even farther
within the exploration of our Eros and Thanatos, then also with the ideals of
the society in the new spheres where they happen to find themselves. He
managed to put so much of his life in his books, and managed to create
characters which are considered as the most completed ones in the history of
Literature. So the following text is nothing but a modest try to penetrate into
the inner feelings of the protagonists in his novel ―Women in Love‖. It is the
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
112
relations among the protagonists that make the readers feel free.
Keywords: Freedom, change, feelings, mental exploration, truth, modernism
Introduction
David Herbert Lawrence, as one of the most outstanding writers in
the world of literature, undertook the most difficult task which he and only
he performed in an extremely successful way, and the reason for managing
this is that he successfully decided to write about the forever lasting magical
principle in the world-the truth. Is it not the truth the only thing that follows
all of us in our long path called life? More specifically, is it the truth about
life, which makes a literary work modern? So, apart from being led by his
purely humane idea, by his purely cosmopolitan ideas, by his philanthropic
attitudes, which derive from his mind and soul, it should be emphasized that
there are other elements that have to be mentioned in the ways in which he
expressed these very heavenly topics. He of course, follows as well the main
impacts which erased the previous ones that gave shape to the new modes of
writing in the new period called the period of Modernism.
Speaking generally, the main specifics of this period are known as
wiping out the old manners of contemplation, expressing it in a direct way,
thus stating the arguments in a very open-minded manner, debating about
life, and everything that life brings about, not forgetting for a moment the
important events in the society which have changed whole life dimensions of
the life of the people, revealing and speaking straight forwardly about
people‘s ―skeletons in the cupboard‖, saying freely ―no‖ or ―yes‖ to the
people who are participants in a conversation, describing the feelings as they
are manifested without paying attention to the fact that these used to be
considered taboos which imprisoned the libertarian mind and spirit in the
past.
1.1 The Main Impacts that Shaped the Period of Modernism, as far as
Fiction is concerned
The period of Modernism according to the chronological point of
view, begins in the ending of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the
twentieth century. One of the first impacts that characterizes this period, is
the French symbolism. Symbolism is closely related to Aesthetics.
Aesthetics means ―the theory of beauty‖, while Symbolism as a movement
opposes naturalism and realism. This is so, because the imagists were trying
to do something deeper, more courageous, something that is called-peoples‘
dreams, unconscious. This means that their main target was peoples‘
imagination. The article that triggered this movement was ―Le Symbolisme‖,
written by Jean Moreas, in the newspaper ―Le Figaro‖, 18 September 1886.
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
113
In this article the author states that symbolism is hostile to ―plain meanings,
declamations, false sentimentality, and matter of fact descriptions. In these
movements, scenes from nature, human activities, and all other real world
phenomena will not be described for their own sake; here they are
perceptible surfaces created to represent their esoteric affinities with the
primordial ideals.‖ (Jean Moreas, 1886) And the phrase art for art‟s sake
was wholeheartedly embraced, and it ―connotes the idea that a work of art
has an intrinsic value without didactic or moral purpose. This concept seems
to have been fist put forward by Lessing in Laokoon (1776), and became
something of an artistic battle-cry or slogan (q.v.) following the publication
of Gautier‘s Preface to Mademoiselle de Maupin (1835).‖ ( A.Cuddon, 1999,
pg.57) The other criteria present in the new modes of writing as far as fiction
is concerned, is objectivity achieved by encompassing implication
multiplicity by a simultaneous view. The very interesting and unique use of
time, which is ―a continuous flow in the consciousness of the individual,
with the ‗already‘ continuously merging into the ‗not yet‘ and retrospect
merging into anticipation‖ (The Norton Anthology of English Literature
1996). Among other influences of this period, has to be stressed the new
psychoanalytical theories of Sigmund Freud, who is called the father of
modern psychology. Freud makes a brilliant comparison between the human
mind and an iceberg, which is divided into three parts: the conscious level
which is the one and only part that can be seen outside the surface of the
water and consists of the thoughts and perceptions; the second part is the
hidden one together with the third one. The second part is the preconscious
level consisting of the memories, and stored knowledge, and finally the third
part or the unconscious level which consists of fears, violent motives,
unacceptable sexual desires, irrational wishes, immoral urges, selfish needs
and shameful experiences. Within this iceberg are to be found: Superego,
Ego and Id. It is the third part that the modernist writers are too much
preoccupied with. And the expression ―stream of consciousness‖ is ―a term
coined by William James in Principles of Psychology (1890), to denote the
flow of inner experiences. Now an almost indispensable term in literary
criticism, it refers to that technique which seeks to depict the multitudinous
thoughts and feelings which pass through the mind. Another phrase for it is
‗interior monologue‘ (q.v.).
Something resembling it is discernible in Sterne‘s Tristram Sandy
(1760-67), and long self-communing passages to be found in some 19th
century novels (e.g., those of Dostoevsky) are also kin to interior monologue
(q.v.). In 1901 the German playwright and novelist Arthur Schnitzler
published a Novella called Lieutenant Gust, a satire on the official code of
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
114
military honour. In this the interior monologue technique is highly
developed. However, it seems that it was a minor French novelist, Eduard
Desjardin, who first used the technique (in a way which was to prove
immensely influential) in Les Laurie‘s sent Coupes (1888). James Joyce,
who is believed to have known this work, exploited the possibilities and took
the technique almost to a point ne plus ultra in Ulysses (1922), which
purports to be an account of the experiences (the actions, thoughts, feelings)
of two men, Leopold Bloom and Stephen Daedalus, during the twenty-four
hours of 16 June 1904, in Dublin. Since the 1920s many writers have learned
from Joyce and emulated him. Virginia Woolf (Mrs. Dalloway, 1925; To the
Lighthouse, 1927) and William Faulkner (The Sound and the Fury, 1931) are
two of the most distinguished developers of the stream of consciousness
method.‖ (J.A.Cuddon, 1999)
David Herbert Lawrence managed to use all these modern impacts in
order to create a wonderful plot, where everything consisting it, beginning
with the incentive moment, the quantity and the quality of the descriptions,
the quality of the conversations among the characters of the novel ―Women
in Love‖, the purity and the sincere aims that he manages to reflect through
their thoughts, confessions and conversations upon the reader, definitely go
far beyond what can be called one of the best writers in the World literature.
D.H.Lawrence has got an extremely immaculate nature: through his
characters we understand perfectly well when he is sad because people are
destroying nature thus destroying the human spirit, he is dejected about the
fierceness of the struggle between the good and the evil, he admires when the
characters in the end triumph by their insistence to tell the truth and nothing
but the truth.
1.2 Some of the most attractive sequences from “Women in Love” where
Lawrence, through the characters shows the characteristics of his
Modernist views
The novel ―Women in Love‖ begins with the chapter 1, called
Sisters. The names of the sisters, who are the main female characters in the
novel are Ursula and Gudrun. When the reader reads the book for the first
time, one has an immediate image of their characters as a result of the choice
that the author has made for their names, as a matter of fact the combination
of u and l in Ursula sounded much lighter than the one of g and d in Gudrun.
So if the vowels are being removed, their names would sound: Ursl for
Ursula, Gdrn for Gudrun.
At the very opening of the book, they speak, that is the sisters, about
the always and forever modern topic marriage, by being concentrated on the
two main parameters which make marriage successful: the need of
experience, and having a child. The reader gets immediately the idea that the
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
115
author glorifies marriage the culmination of which is giving birth to children,
and this means that he is preparing the reader to face all the interesting
experiences that these two young ladies will have to go through, and try to
understand as well, what are their preferences on this topic as well. Since
they are mentioning the word child, it means that the author has got rather
cultivated ideas about marriage. By mentioning the world child, the author
also wants to remind us the purity and innocence of the beginning of the
conversation between two sisters about this really important topic, but also of
the purity of a real marriage. And this is something which will happen in the
end of the novel.
By mentioning the word experience, on the other hand, the author
prepares the reader to face a wide variety of feelings, emotions, actions, as
well as reactions that the sisters will manifest throughout the whole book,
experiences that are perfectly well described, so that the reader begins co-
feeling the same emotions as those shown through the characters. While
participating in the conversation, Ursula is stitching embroidery, while
Gudrun is drawing a sketch. Just like Ursula, Lawrence begins to stitch his
ideas, bit by bit, chapter by chapter, about very interesting modern themes, in
―his crystal ball‖ called life. In the end of the book, this ball will be filled
with embroideries of the finest taste, because the author manages to have
fully completed all the characters in the book, as far as all the human
elements that create a well developed character are concerned.
The sisters, having finished the conversation, decide to go out for a
walk. Ursula is dressed modestly, while Gudrun, who has lived in London
for a while, had on her perfectly matched colours and materials of genuine
silk, which, according to the reader may be a very sharp message: the inner
part of the things are never the same with the way they look from the outside.
The sisters leave their father‘s house, and go out, by passing near the
blackened colliery houses with a lot of children playing and calling names.
Gudrun detested this, is this so because she may be forgetting that this was
her origin, this is the place she began her life from, and this is the place she
went to London, but also the place she returned back to. And the golden
unwritten rule says that you can never escape from your own origin. This is
the following message which Lawrence reflects, no matter who you are, you
can never erase your origin.
What is more, I think that the author‘s desire is to remind the reader
about the pride of the moments, or more specifically the time when these two
ladies were given birth to, by showing a kind of nostalgia, of the minds and
souls of these two sisters, but also of the rest of the people, in the
environment they were brought up, two or three decades ago. All this
happened not a very long time ago. As a matter of fact, they were born in a
quite different environment than the present one, a much cleaner, with less
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
116
dust, less dark thoughts, less difficult struggle for life, much careless and
happy life. So, the society actually is a very important element which makes
people change. Now they live in an industrialized era, Gudrun even went to
London, which in the poems of many Modernist writers is depicted as a
desolate, cold and unreal city, due to the effects of the era of great
industrialization of the country. So, that is the reason for her spiritual dryness
which is very much present in her conversations, in her actions and reactions,
throughout the whole book, so that the reader gets the impression as if she is
carrying the spiritual dryness of all London, into this small town she was
born, in order to oppose everything natural that exists in there.
The two sisters decide to go to the church where there is a mass of
people, and of course Ursula‘s eyes catch the figure of Rupert Birkin, while
on the other hand Gudrun distinguishes from all this mass of people Gerald
Crich. The reader feels the fluid of likeness among the sisters and these two
gentlemen, just because the author manages to create an extremely realistic
atmosphere. It is so realistic that the reader simply gets the impression that is
participating in everything that is going on.
The other thing that may go through the reader`s mind when reading
this book for the first time, is the fact that there is another evident similarity
of the softness, and harshness of the consonants used in the names of these
two young men, as it is with the names of the sisters. Rupert has got a milder
pronunciation of his name due to r and p, while Gerald has got a harsher one
due to g and d. So Rp or Rpt would be the pronunciation without vowels for
Rupert, and Gr, or Grld for Gerald. One thing is sure, Gdn (Gudrun) and
(Grld) sound as if the edge of a sharp knife whish is scratching the soft
surface of ―the magic ball‖ called life. This is what these two characters are
really doing throughout the whole book, scratching the mild and genteel
surface of their emotions.
When Rupert goes to visit The Criches in the Shortlands, after having
a conversation with Mrs. Crich, quite out of blue, he reveals a very shocking
event of Gerald‘s past. He has murdered quite accidentally his brother, in his
early childhood. The dilemma that Lawrence puts through the mouth of
Rupert Birkin is the following one: ―Is there no such thing as a pure
accident? Has everything that happens a universal significance?‖(Women in
Love, pg.40) So Lawrence is preparing the reader of what might be the
outcome of this, actually of what Gerald had done in his childhood.
Everybody knows that memory begins from the early childhood. This is the
reason why the author wants to make us aware of the fact that the pang of
remorse will follow Gerald throughout all his life and it will have an
enormous influence on the decisions that he will make through all his life.
This means that he will always have the big wall of obstacles in front of him
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
117
that might be an extremely heavy burden that he will have to carry on his
shoulders!
This past event creates numerous hidden fears, shameful experiences,
which might bring him to irrational thoughts, xenophobic moods, and bad
choices in his life, because unfortunately they will accompany him wherever
he goes and whatever he does. After all, one of the ancient rules of peoples
fate is that our life is nothing but a result of the good or bad choices that we
make. And the other thing is the good, famous, ancient Isaac Newton‘s rule-
each action has got its reaction. So Lawrence here wants to tell and remind
the reader that life is not a game to play with, but a serious circle of events,
each of them following the other, that is why everybody should be extremely
careful about living one‘s life.
In every single page, Lawrence keeps on developing more and more
his life philosophy, by showing the maturity and completeness of his
protagonists, as far as their attitudes about life are concerned, thus enabling
them to have very long or short conversations, where they express
themselves about different segments of life, and all of the topics they tackle
are very much present in our every day life, even nowadays, and I think they
are going to be present in the future of humanity, as well, because it is
Lawrence who is a wonderful visionary about life.
―He saw vividly with his spirit the grey, forward-stretching face of
the savage woman, dark and tense, abstracted in utter physical stress. It was a
terrible face, void, peaked, abstracted almost into meaningless by the weight
of sensation beneath.‖ (Women in Love, pg.97). This is the small carved
figure of a savage woman, almost naked, who was in labour. Rupert is very
much impressed by this figure and calls it a real work of art. This makes
Gerald ask for an explanation why he thinks like that, and of course this is a
very proper moment for Birkin to express his attitudes about art, because as
he states previously, he can not stand any longer life by being too much
visual, he wants to feel, hear and understand it, that is, to feel it completely,
by involving al his possible senses, so that he, himself would feel complete.
Rupert Birkin has got a very sharp eye, as well as a very sharp
mechanism which enables him to select the tiny little details and analyse
them the way they deserve to be to analysed, and this is the reason why he
always, always feels completed about the things he wants to debate about,
and even about the way he feels, which is for most of the people beyond the
grasp of their rationality-feeling fulfilled when speaking freely about your
emotions. This is the reason why Birkin is so much thrilled to speak so
emotionally about what the figure hides in itself. According to Birkin, this
tiny little figure hides in itself a very ancient history, which has been
developed from the moment it had begun to be carved, till the moment they
were discussing it. And what is more, its history is going to last as long as
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
118
history lasts. Actually what Rupert wants to stress is his longing for the
ancient primitive societies, when human‘s spirit and mind were not dried by
the destructions of the modern societies and all other negative influences it
brings within itself. In these ancient societies people used to communicate
with each other with a lot of immaculately clean emotions. It is these
emotions that made them act, according to the rules of their unspoiled
societies. In those societies it was not the machine that was the God of their
lives, it was not the underworld where the people had to go and earn their
upper world living, in those societies people used to have a real heart and
not an improper substitution of a heart by ‗metallic unimportant emotions‘.
For Gerald Crich, his father, and even his small sister, it was the
machine the real God, which unfortunately is a very poor and very a sad
imitation of his father who never had enough time for his children, with his
hands full of metal keys in his pockets with which he opened and closed the
countless doors of his coals, that is the huge underworld he was a master of,
where he had a lot of miners working for him, in order to earn their living,
thus increasing Gerald father‘s riches, thus being more and more alienated.
So three generations are being destroyed, as a result of this behaviour. This is
a perfect image of a father businessman, who is losing everything around
him, losing the respect and love of his own children, forgetting his wife, and
forgetting everything that makes life worth living. So these kinds of people
are the target for Lawrence`s writing, who are terminators of themselves and
later on of everything around them. That is why Gerald Crich knew nothing
about love, and that is why all these egoistic characteristics of him were a
real torture for him and never let him give his heart to anyone. The only
thing that could have saved his situation might have been simply leave life
run smoothly, without putting himself in front of life and pushing it rather
hard, dictated by an irrational moment dictated to him by his childish brain.
Are these the same things that we feel even nowadays, at the very
beginning of the twenty first century, when and where all of us are victims of
the various forms of manifestations of the pathological influences that the
―modern society ― is having on all of us. That is why, through the very
realistic and sincere conversations among the characters he gives a very
vivid panorama of the modern times, and that is why Lawrence is considered
one of the biggest visionaries in the history of Literature.
Our Modern Times
Our day begins with the machine. The first moment when you enter
work, you either have to press your finger print to register electronically your
presence at work, where the machine will guarantee the number of the hours
that you have to work. Or you have to push your ID plastic card so that again
the machine will be your guarantee. This is so because your boss, does not
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
119
trust you, your boss who can enter and get out from the same building, never
being asked about the hours that he has worked. So the very ―sophisticated,
stupid machine‖ becomes the main authority of your life, the main dictator of
your life. The epilogue, the result of all this is the anger and the wreath, the
stress and the hatred that become the main driving forces of the peoples` life.
That is why whole societies in the world today, are being destroyed, just
because people hate each other, that is why people kill each other, on
purpose, with the cold thing called gun, or something like that. That is the
reason why people become real misanthropists and are directed toward
themselves, by forgetting how beautiful life can be. That is why people have
a desperate need to run from reality, either by becoming introvert types, or
running away from the reality by taking drugs, too many tranquilizers, there
is still misogyny, societies when women have to sell their bodies either as a
rebellion toward their families, friends, or they are so poor that they have to
earn their living in that way. All this is so because somebody wants to
control the rest of the people. This is something that is called authority by
force, which fortunately or unfortunately does not last forever. The electronic
machine or plastic cards are becoming inevitable parts of our lives,
destroying all of us in a miserable way.
On the other hand, there is Rupert Birkin, whose continuous search to
find the good man of his life, is his opposite of all these above mentioned
devastating situations of human mind and body. Rupert Birkin has been
percepted as a human being who always considers himself as if put in front
of a new life experience, no matter what he faces in his every day life. That
is the reason that whatever he thinks and does is so original, so clean, so well
described by the author. This is so because his blood is running so quickly,
so humanly. The reason why he is so much completed is that even though he
pretends in front of every single situation as if he has never experienced it
before, actually it is the experience that he had had previously in his life,
something that his recollection may serve him or not.
So, in the book there are two different types of men who represent the
force of creation, presented by Rupert Birkin, and the force of destruction or
Thanatos, presented by Gerald Crich. This is the reason why Rupert Birkin is
the chosen one, or the privileged one to react humanly toward everything
that happens to him, and on the other hand Gerald Crich who he did not
understand the pure, clean kind of love that Rupert Birkin is searching for,
beginning from the primitive societies. Rupert Birkin is seeking a perfect
kind of love, in which the partners would give themselves to each other,
would share the most intimate things never being revealed before between
them, without any conditions. This is something that Gerald can not
understand, because his heart is as cold as ice, very similar to Gudrun‘s,
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
120
because both of them are in love not with sharing their emotions, but
scratching them, just like wild animals.
Chapter 19: Moony
The real love which is being developed in the novel is the one
between Rupert Birkin and Ursula Brangwen. It is developed in a very
spontaneous way without pushing by force any moment or situation, no
natter whether they agree or disagree about it. Because it is the value of
argument which is the main leader of their love, they are not being afraid of
any mistake or failure, because they were absolutely aware of the purity of
their emotions, they honestly trust in each other, it is not a kind of trust
which is being created during one day, but through complete openness
toward each other, something that never happens in the societies of the
twenty first century. What is more there were no conditions put by any of
them, they were experiencing the magic peace that only real love can offer.
Rupert asks her to give him her golden light on her, in the chapter 19
―Moony‖, making her feel a little bit upset because she did not know what
kind of light it was, and also telling him that she feels unfulfilled. And little
by little Rupert explains her that the light he wants is herself-that is her spirit.
―I want you to drop your assertive will, your frightened apprehensive self-
insistence that is what I want. I want you to trust yourself so implicitly that
you can let yourself go.‖ (Women in Love, pg.290). This is the true kind of
love, which makes the two protagonists fall completely in love with each
other, and that is why their honesty and righteousness is crowned with love,
something that everybody desperately needs.
So this is the miracle that can save relationships toward your friends,
your beloved ones, towards yourself. I think that people who do not love
themselves can never love anyone else. That is why we are sometimes afraid
of even our own shadows. That is why there is so much mediocrity,
ignorance pretending wisdom, because there is not enough space for the
culture of beauty, reason, tolerance to be revealed.
Chapter 24: Death and Love
―Thomas Crich died slowly. It seemed impossible to everybody that
the thread of life could be drawn out so thin, and yet not break. The sick man
lay unutterably weak and spent, kept alive by morphia and by drinks, which
he sipped slowly. He was only half conscious-a thin strand of consciousness
linking the darkness of death with the light of day. Yet his will was
unbroken, he was integral, complete. Only he must have perfect stillness
about him‖ (Women in Love, pg. 367).
Yes, this is true. Thomas Crich dies slowly. Older people say that bad
people die slowly, while the bad ones die quickly. This means that the bad
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
121
people‘s soul is tormented, beginning to feel even while they it is alive the
pains of Hell. While, on the other hand, the good ones go directly to Heaven,
without being tormented. Is the author giving the last warning to the son of
Thomas-Gerald to repent, as far as his dark emotions are concerned. But
Gerald was shocked by this situation of his father. Is this so because this can
not happen to extremely powerful people like his father, who was a real God
for everybody? Can his father not be immune to death in the same way he
was immune to love and care? How can death happen in this family again?
Gerald was very much close to each other, because they were very much
alike. Why is Gerald felling his father‘s death as if it was his own? Was he
not able to continue without the support of his father? How is it possible that
―the equilibrium‖ between these two souls will be destroyed? Now instead
the ―equilibrium between two pieces of metal‖ will exist only one metal
heart, which will go on to functioning on his own. That is why Gerald was
very much afraid by the death of his love; he was too much dependant on
everything and everybody, except the inner part of himself, which is his real
self.
The main idea of the author of the book, David Herbert Lawrence, is
to repentance for something he can never forgive himself. Being brought up
by a mother who used to have the superiority complex toward her husband
that is toward his father, she became the commander of the author‘s life, who
in fact was not given the chance to feel his father‘s love completely, because
his mother wanted this to happen. The question is could he have loved his
father if he were as rich as Thomas Crich? So the reason why Thomas Crich
had a metal heart, and a robot like behaviour is a good excuse why Gerald
did not love anyone else except his father, the mines, himself. So if
Lawrence would have had a father like Gerald Crich, he would have become
like Gerald. That is why he chooses Rupert Birkin to be presented as a
complete figure, who never makes mistakes. This is why Lawrence feels
sorry for not knowing the complete love of his father toward him. But still,
he gives one of the last chances to Gerald Crich to show that he, the author
still believes in something good that a man might possess, no matter how
evil he really was, like Gerald`s father, or the other extreme no matter how
evil his mother wanted to present his father, he could not feel the good sides
of him, and that is the reason Lawrence is completely capable of putting his
characters in a computer tomography and give them a better mental
diagnosis then the machine would have done, he detested the machine, didn‘t
he! ―As he drew nearer to her, he plunged deeper into her enveloping soft
warmth, a wonderful creative heat that penetrated his veins and gave him life
again. He felt himself dissolving and sinking to rest in the bath of her living
strength. It seemed as if her heart in her breast were a second unconquerable
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
122
sun, into the glow and creative strength of which he plunged farther and
farther .All his veins, that were murdered and lacerated, healed softly as life
came pulsing in, stealing invisibly into him as if it were the all-powerful
effluence of the sun. His blood, which seemed to have been drawn back into
death, came ebbing on the return, surely, beautifully, powerfully.‖ (Women
in Love, pg.393)
These are the feelings that Gerald Crich feels after his father death,
after he hugs and kisses Gudrun. Finally we read the words like ―veins‖, ―his
life was pulsing again‖, and ―the powerful effluence of the sun.‖ So Gerald is
finally surrounded by a normal warmth that everybody feels throughout
one`s life. He is beginning to enjoy the beauty of love, and he thinks that he
is in love with Gudrun. So his life rhythm has got a mathematical scheme,
now ―the equilibrium‖ is spoilt, he needs somebody else on the other part
where his father used to be. But this new situation makes him behave like a
little child who is getting to know the unknown. It is a wonderful feeling, and
Gerald admits it. He is very thankful for the new wonderful feeling, quite
odd in his life experience, but he is beginning to wake up. He was aware that
he has been destroyed, but he seems to like the beginning of a new
regeneration. So the two of them, Gudrun and Gerald loved to love each
other at that particular moment, when Gerald has the biggest loss in his life,
the death of his father. So their consciousness, emotions, sensations,
excitements, their love was awakened. But why does Gerald have the feeling
that he is not going to live forever. He knew that his life would be short. He
even wanted to kill Gudrun when he sees Gudrun with e German friend of
his. And this is his final wish, a mixed kind of feeling, a very scaring one,
wanting to kill somebody that revived his emotion, and than his premonition
of his own death.
―Lord Jesus, was it then bound to be-Lord Jesus! He could feel the
blow descending, he knew he was murdered. Vaguely wandering forward,
his hands lifted as if to feel what would happen, he was waiting for the
moment when he would stop, when it would cease. It was not over yet.
He had come to the hollow basin of snow, surrounded by sheer slopes
and precipices, out of which rose a track that brought one to the top of the
mountain. But he wandered unconsciously, till he slipped and fell down, and
as he fell something broke in his soul, he went to sleep.‖ (Women in Love,
pg.534)
Lord Jesus, this is the end. This is the end of Gerald Crich. The man
who had accidentally murdered his brother when he was a child, a man
always devoted to his love toward his father, who was a big businessman,
loved for fifteen minutes Gudrun Brangwen, after they made love to each
other, and then he desperately wanted to kill her as a sign of jealousy, a men
European Scientific Journal April 2014 edition vol.10, No.11 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
123
with an iron heart, without emotions and sensations, without the pulse of a
real happy life, his heart was as cold as ice, and he died covered by snow.
Conclusion
The message of the book, the idea, the topic and everything about it is
about the struggle between death and life. The two most powerful forces
which are present in ourselves from the moment we are being born. The
forces that are with us throughout all our life. No matter what happens, the
reader deeply believes that the life force always wins in the end. Even
though the other force, the destructive one tries to prevail, to destroy human
beings, their souls and minds, to destroy whole worlds, whole generations,
still the miracle is all around us, if we are able to find it. Love is something
that all the characters in ―Women in Love‖ are striving for. So is David
Herbert Lawrence! It is to be adored the simple way in which Lawrence tries
to illuminate the dark thoughts of the people, and the society they live in.
That is why Lawrence is an outstanding writer, whose value is getting
bigger and bigger, without falling into oblivion. The topics that he elaborates
in a wonderful way are our everyday life. He teaches us a lot, and the most
important thing is- never to be ashamed of what we are.
References:
Abrams, Donaldson, Smith, Adams, Monk, Lipking, Ford, Daiches, ―The
Norton Anthology of English Literature‖, Norton & Company, Inc., Ontario,
1996, Vol. 2.
Cuddon, J. A., The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary
Theory, Penguin Books, Ltd., 1998.
Lawrence. D.H., ―Women in Love‖, Penguin Popular Classics, London,
1996.
Article
Rasipuram Krishnaswami Iyer Narayanaswami who is one of the most versatile and prolific novelists in the history of the Indian English Literature, has presented the typical Indian characters and the true Indian atmosphere to show the contemporary Indian society in his works. The most distinguished fact of his novel is that he has dealt with essentially the middle class characters and has created a fictional South Indian Malgudi town like Thomas Hardy‘s Wessex or William Faulkner‘s Yoknapatawpha County. His fictional world has projected an exploration of the conjugal relationship in the domestic world and the themes of marital and extra marital relationships have always been the focus of many literary works in the Indian English Literature. However, his novels are deeply rooted in customs, traditions, beliefs, and superstitions of the Indian society and are preoccupied with the theme of family relationship, East- West encounter, education etc. Here in this paper an attempt has been made to reveal his portrayal of marital and extra marital affairs and at the same time it also aims to find out the reasons of extra marital relationship. However, through this exploration, we can observe that he has vividly presented the contemporary scenario of the Indian society which always follows the stream of conventional and unconventional way of life.
Article
Статтю присвячено дослідженню головних жіночих образів романів, які належать кардинально різним культурам – «західній» та «східній» в аспектах жіночого виховання та здобуття освіти. Ми виокремлюємо один із скандальних романів англійського письменника-модерніста Девіда Ґерберта Лоуренса (1885–1930 рр.) «Згублена дівчина» (1920 р.) та перського письменника Сейєда Мортаза Мошфека Каземі (1904–1978) «Жахливий Тегеран» (1922 р.). Метою статті є не лише дослідження розкриття жіночого образу межі 19–20 ст. з точки зору британської та іранської літератур, але і їхнього порівняння. У ході роботи було використано комплексний аналіз, з залученням концептів культурно-історичного і порівняльно-історичного методів, а також звернення до теоретичних робіт, що були створені на засадах феміністичної критики. Обидві героїні зображені письменниками по-новому; вони не бояться кинути виклик патріархальному устрою життя і намагаються відійти від стереотипів, які міцно засіли у свідомості людей ще з давніх часів. У характерах головних героїнь виокремлено стрімке бажання до змін і кожна з них по-своєму розкривається в «жіночому» та «фемінному» концептах. Порівняння обраних жіночих образів дає підставу для ствердження, що культура Європи та Сходу є кардинально різними і навряд чи колись будуть ідентичними. Героїня Д. Ґ. Лоуренса Альвіна заперечує визнання жінки як «Іншої», вона воліє вийти з влади чоловіка і його контролю, в той час коли героїня М. М. Каземі Меїн-ханум підтверджує скрутне становище жінок, бо знаходиться в середині конфлікту саме через приналежність до жіночого гендеру. Митці зображують соціально сконструйовану проблему – жінка намагається побудувати власне життя, у той час, коли соціум категорично заперечує її бажання. На думку спільноти, єдине що має робити жінка – це обмежуватись категоріями «дружина», «мати», «домогосподиня». Таким чином, письменники розкривають ментальність людей обох культур, які не бажають сприймати жінку вільною особистістю.
Article
Full-text available
Статтю присвячено дослідженню жіночого образу в скандальному романі англійського письменника-модерніста Девіда Герберта Лоуренса (1885-1930 рр.) «Згублена дівчина» (1920 р.). Митець зображує конфлікт сильної для тієї епохи жінки із суспільством із застарілими поглядами на життя, яке пліткує і таврує особистість, яка не підходить до загальноприйнятих критеріїв і норм. Метою статті є інтерпретація характеру гувернантки Міс Фрост з точки зору феміністичної критики: виокремлення концептів «фемінне», «феміністське» і «жіноче» в цьому образі. У ході роботи було використано комплексний аналіз, а також звернення до теоретичних робіт, які описують дослідження літературних творів на засадах феміністичної критики. У характері героїні Лоуренса виокремлено «фемінний», «феміністичний» та «жіночий» концепти. Вона хоч і не зорієнтована на кар’єру, але постійно працює задля того, щоб утримувати себе («феміністичний» концепт); також вона займається розвитком власних творчих здібностей («фемінний» концепт); піклується про «чужу» дитину та родину («жіночий» концепт). Д. Г. Лоуренс зображує соціально сконструйовану проблему – жінка не може побудувати власне життя, бо суспільство соромить її. На думку спільноти, Міс Фрост не мала права зустрічатися і проводити вільний час на одинці з чоловіком, якого вона зустріла; не мала права мати сексуальні відносини поза шлюбом. Так письменник розкриває ментальність представників суспільства, які заради власного самоствердження пліткують про інтимні подробиці життя жінки. Так соціум намагається мати «владу» над жінкою, бо мотив кожного слова і вчинку обертається навколо бажання впливати
Article
The article is devoted to the study of the female image in the novel The Lost Girl by the English modernist writer David Herbert Lawrence and to the actualization of the issue of woman’s role and place in the society at the beginning of the 20th century. The rapid development of feminism led to the aggravation of the issue of the woman’s existence and their status in the community, their rights and freedoms. A woman stops to be a man’s shadow, as she used to be under the patriarchal way of life of people, she prefers to express her own views on everyday or social problems, goals, ideas, desires. The purpose of the article is to highlight the concepts of “feminine”, “feminist”, "female" in the image of Alvina, which reflect the character’s relationship with her family and other characters of the novel, who surrounded her at different periods of her life. The main heroine’s character is elaborated in the article. Alvina is depicted so contradictory that she is dominated by a single concept at different periods of her life. They seem to flow in to each other, not simply coexist. We considered the young girl’s relationship with the family and the society in which she lives, precisely through the description of which, the writer focuses the reader’s attention on the problem of “woman-society” relations. The main character is depicted by the writer as a strong and courageous woman who does not fit into the framework that was typical for the community of the 19th- 20th centuries. D.H. Lawrence and his bold creativity are the forerunner of the events that will unfold in society later, when the question of woman’s role and place in the society will reach the peak of its popularity.