During two decades (1986 - 2008) of geochronological work in Heimefrontfjella, nearly 130 geochronological ages were produced using a wide range of geochronological techniques. The ages fall into four broad age groups from Archaean to Cenozoic times, revealing a long and complex geological history. In general, Heimefrontfjella consists of Mesoproterozoic high grade basement related to the ∼1100
... [Show full abstract] Ma Maud Belt. This basement is overlain by Permo-Carboniferous sedimentary rocks and Jurassic lavas. Archaean and Palaeoproterozoic detrital zircon ages are recorded from meta-sedimentary rocks probably characterizing the foreland of the Maud Belt. The protolith and metamorphic ages of the Mesoproterozoic Maud Belt fall into two groups. An older age group from ∼1200-1100 Ma is related to back-arc and island arc volcanism. High-grade metamorphism in the Maud Belt is dated between 1090-1060 Ma and is thought to reflect continent-continent collision, possibly related to the formation of Rodinia. Regional cooling to below 500-300 °C at ∼1010-960 Ma in part of the mountain range might indicate rifting of Rodinia. The eastern part of the mountain range is overprinted by the ∼600-500 Ma East African-Antarctic Orogen. The orogenic front of this major mobile belt is exposed in the study area as the Heimefront Shear Zone. East of this major lineament all Ar-Ar, K-Ar and Rb-Sr mineral ages are reset to ∼500 Ma. Initial Gondwana rifting affected the area at c. 180 Ma, when the Bouvet/Karroo mantle plume caused dynamic uplift of the area, followed by burial underneath up to 2 km of Jurassic lava. This led to tempering of the basement up to about 100 °C, as indicated by apatite fission track data. The lava pile underwent erosion in Cretaceous time, when renewed rifting affected the region. Latest tectonic movements might be related to Cenozoic ice loading related to the built up of the Antarctic ice sheet.